Diagnosis Of Breast Microcalcifications Research Articles

Application value of digital tungsten-molybdenum dual target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire excision biopsy in diagnosis of breast microcalcification.

To explore the application value of digital tungsten-molybdenum double target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire and guided surgical resection biopsy in the diagnosis of breast microcalcification. A retrospective analysis of 168 patients with negative clinical palpation and molybdenum target X-ray examination found breast abnormalities were equally divided into two groups according to different surgical positioning methods. The control and observation group underwent gross positioning biopsy and digital tungsten-molybdenum dual-target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire to guide surgical resection biopsy, respectively. The results of molybdenum target X-ray examination and the success rate of one-time complete resection of the lesions were compared between the two groups, and the corresponding relationship between the pathological diagnosis results of the lesions after surgical resection and the performance of mammography in the observation group was compared. There was no significant difference in age and molybdenum target X-ray examination results between the two groups (P > 0.05). General information is comparable; the success rate of one-time complete resection of lesions in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.2% vs 78.6%, P = 0.024). There were 34 cases of malignant lesions in the observation group, accounting for 40.5% (34/84), including 11 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (64.7%), 50 cases of benign lesions, accounting for 59.5% (50/84), including 16 cases of breast lobular hyperplasia (32%), 18 cases of breast cystic hyperplasia (36%). In diagnosis of breast microcalcifications, surgical resection biopsy guided using digital tungsten-molybdenum double target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire achieves high success rate and has advantages of high safety and accurate diagnosis. Thus, it has potential to play a greater role in early diagnosis of breast cancer and is worthy of clinical application.

Diagnosis of Breast Micro calcifications with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography and Histopathological Correlation

Abstract Backgroud: Microcalcificaitons constitute up to 31% of lesions detected at screening mammography. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) often presents with microcalcificaitons on mammography. Of all mammographically detected DCIS lesions, up to 79% manifest with microcalcifications only. However, not all microcalficications are associated with in situ or malignant disease. Aim of Study: To evaluate diagnostic value of contrast enhanced digital mammography in breast microcalcificaations. Methods: A retrospective study of 30 patients having mammographic suspicious breast calcifications under BIRADS 4, 5 and 6 categories. A high-energy and a low-energy digital mammograms were obtained and then images were subtracted, isolating the iodine signal in the region of angiogenesis. 1.5mg/kg of the contrast agent was injected by hand over a period of 1 minute at a rate of 3mL per second, followed by a saline solution flush. Breast compression was applied to reduce the thickness of the breast and images obtained exactly 2 min after contrast administration. Image acquisitions: Cranio-caudal and the medio-lateral oblique projections for the abnormal breast were obtained exactly 2 minutes after contrast injection followed by cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique projections of the normal breast. The lesions were analyzed by specialized radiologist for the presence, morphology, and pattern of enhancement. Finally, Correlation with histopatho-logical findings was done. Results: The sensitivity of CEDM in detecting malignant pathology with contrast uptake was 96%. Compared to sensi-tivity of 86.7% in FFDM. There were lesions of IDC in (69.2%), lesion of DCIS in (11.5%), lesion of IDCS & IDC in (11.5%) and lesions of ILC in (3.8%). Enhancement was also observed in 3/4 (75%) of the benign lesions. Conclusion: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mam-mography is a useful technique in the diagnosis of underlying disease in mammographically detected breast microcalcifica-tions.

Image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications.

ObjectiveThe present study was performed to assess the accuracy and clinical value of image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the diagnosis of mammography-detected breast microcalcifications.MethodsThis prospective study involved 100 patients with suspicious mammography-detected microcalcifications who underwent image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies from January 2013 to October 2016. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB) was performed in 64 patients, and ultrasound (US)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (US-VAB) was performed in 36 patients in whom application of SVAB was difficult. The microcalcifications were detectable by mammography or US. The mean follow-up duration was 32 months (range, 9–57 months). The biopsy results were correlated with the pathological examination results.ResultsThe positive predictive value of microcalcifications detected by mammography and US in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 37.0% (37/100) and 52.8% (19/36), respectively. The negative predictive value of microcalcifications detected by US in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 71.9% (46/64). No recurrence was observed in the 37 patients with breast cancer. No evidence of malignancy was found among the 63 patients with benign lesions.ConclusionImage-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is accurate and minimally invasive. It can be used as a safe approach for diagnosis in patients with breast microcalcifications.

Utility of an upright-type 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome®) for the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of an upright-type 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome®) for the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications

Diagnosis of breast microcalcifications: a comparison of stereotactic FNA and core imprint cytology as adjuncts to core biopsy

Stereotactic core biopsy (CB) using 14-gauge needles was adopted as the standard method of diagnosis of screen-detected breast microcalcifications (MC) at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital in 1996. Fine needle aspiration (SFNA) was included as an adjunct, to optimise sensitivity and to provide immediate reporting. Recently, core imprint cytology (CI) has been shown to have a high sensitivity in diagnosing malignancy. The aims of this paper were to evaluate the accuracy of SFNA as an adjunct to CB, and whether CI could replace SFNA for immediate reporting in MC. Part A is a retrospective review of CB/SFNA of screen-detected MC from May 1998 to February 2000. A minimum of five cores was performed. SFNA samples were restricted to a maximum of three needle passes. Part B is a prospective study of CI from May to November 2000. In Part A, there were 406 MC in 353 women and 81 carcinomas were proven on excision. The complete sensitivity of CB for a diagnosis of malignancy was 97.5% and of SFNA was 65%. No false-positive diagnoses were made by either method. No extra carcinomas were detected using SFNA. In Part B, CB/CI were performed on 203 MC from 165 women. There were 38 carcinomas and 30 of these (79%) were diagnosed as malignant on CI. No false-positive diagnoses were made. The predictive value of a benign diagnosis was 95%. SFNA had little value as an adjunct to core biopsy in MC. CI promises to be useful in providing same day diagnosis for counselling purposes and for planning future surgery.

Digital Optical Card

To assess a patient-oriented digital optical card (OC) for documentation and communication of images using the analysis of breast microcalcifications to illustrate its resolution power. Fifty film mammograms with histologically proved clustered microcalcifications were digitized using a 5 lp/mm CCD-scanner. A region of interest containing the cluster was selected for documentation on an OC as an overview OC-image and as a magnified OC-image (5 lp/mm). The shape (spherical/nonspherical) as well as the total number of microcalcifications were quantitatively analyzed by 2 radiologists. The detection rate for total number of overall and spherical microcalcifications using digital media was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) compared to analog mammography. There were no significant differences in the detection rate of nonspherical microcalcifications between film mammograms (100%) and magnified section OC-images (92.7%). The overview OC-image revealed 72% of those calcifications (p < 0.01). According to our results, this technology is not appropriate for diagnosis of breast microcalcifications, but may be a promising communication digital medium for transmitting an image/report unit to referring physicians.