Diagnosis Of Bacterial Peritonitis Research Articles

The Role of Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Predicting Ascitic Fluid Infection in Hospitalized Cirrhotic and Non-cirrhotic Patients

Objective: To determine the role of serum procalcitonin levels in predicting ascites infection in hospitalized cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.Methods: A total of 101 patients (mean age: 63.4±1.3, 66.3% were males) hospitalized due to cirrhosis (n=88) or malignancy related (n=13) ascites were included in this study. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP, 19.8%), culture-negative SBP (38.6%), bacterascites (4.9%), sterile ascites (23.8%) and malign ascites (12.9%) groups were compared in terms of procalcitonin levels in predicting ascites infection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of procalcitonin levels and predicting outcome of procalcitonin levels was compared with C-reactive protein (CRP).Results: Culture positivity was determined in 26.7% of overall population. Serum procalcitonin levels were determined to be significantly higher in patients with positive bacterial culture in ascitic fluid compared to patients without culture positivity (median (min-max): 4.1 (0.2-36.4) vs. 0.4 (0.04-15.8), p<0.001). Using ROC analysis, a serum procalcitonin level of <0.61 ng/mL in SBP (area under curve (AUC): 0.981, CI 95%: 0.000-1.000, p<0.001), <0.225 ng/mL in culture-negative SBP (AUC: 0.743, CI 95%: 0.619-0.867, p<0.001), <0.42 ng/mL in SBP and culture-negative SBP patients (AUC: 0.824, CI 95%: 0.732-0.916, p<0.001), and <1.12 ng/mL in bacterascites (AUC: 0.837, CI 95%: 0.000-1.000, p=0.019) were determined to accurately rule out the diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis. Predictive power of serum procalcitonin levels in SBP + culture-negative SBP group (AUCs: 0.824 vs 0.622, p=0.004, Fig 4), culture-positive SBP (AUCs: 0.981 vs 0.777, p=0.006, Fig 5) and (although less powerfull) in culture-negative SBP (AUCs: 0.743 vs 0.543, p=0.02, Fig 6) were found significantly higher than CRP.Conclusion: According to our findings determination of serum procalcitonin levels seems to provide satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in differentiating bacterial infections in hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis related ascites.

Ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count and serum to ascites albumin gradient in the diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis

The analysis of ascitic fluid has been complicated by several recently reported new tests. To simplify this assessment, we evaluated nine parameters prospectively and simultaneously in blood and ascitic fluid from 285 patients with ascites to determine which were the most reliable for immediate diagnosis of the etiology of the ascites and of its complications. Subjects were first divided into four groups: sterile cirrhotic ascites (n = 201), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 41), malignant ascites (n = 34), and miscellaneous ascites (n = 9). An ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear count > 500/μl was the test with the greatest accuracy (96%) for the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Neither the most precise cutoff values for ascitic fluid pH (<7.32) and ascitic fluid lactate (>32 mg/dl), nor their respective blood-ascitic fluid gradients (>0.11 and <−20 mg/dl) were more reliable indexes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, mainly due to the decreased ascitic fluid pH and increased ascitic fluid lactate observed in malignant ascites, tuberculous peritonitis, and pancreatic ascites. A blood-ascitic fluid albumin gradient <1.1 g/dl was the most accurate parameter for the diagnosis of malignant ascites (diagnostic efficacy, 93%). Therefore, the etiologic analysis of ascitic fluid might be simplified and the single practice of two tests, ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count and blood-ascitic fluid albumin gradient, provides immediately useful information.

The diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis

The diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis

The diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis

The diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis