Diagnosis Of Abdominal Wall Defects Research Articles

Diagnosis of abdominal wall defects in the first trimester

To review prognostic parameters reported recently in the evaluation of abdominal wall defects in the first trimester. Evaluation of abdominal wall defects in the first trimester is based principally on associated structural or chromosomal anomalies. In the case of gastroschisis, which is rarely associated with other anomalies, evaluation of prenatal or postnatal outcome is based mainly on the course of pregnancy. In the case of isolated omphalocele in the first trimester, recent studies have evaluated parameters that could help predict prenatal or postnatal outcome. We review recent studies using new parameters to diagnose abdominal wall defects in the first trimester and to provide early prenatal counselling to parents regarding prenatal and postnatal prognosis.

Outcomes of Parental Treatment Decisions for Fetuses With a Prenatal Diagnosis of Abdominal Wall Defects

Outcomes of Parental Treatment Decisions for Fetuses With a Prenatal Diagnosis of Abdominal Wall Defects

Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging is useful in providing predictive values for surgical procedures in abdominal wall defects

Background Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for the diagnosis of abdominal wall defects. Its predictive value concerning the possibility of primary closure of the abdominal wall, however, has so far not been reported. Methods Between August 2001 and November 2004, antenatal MRI was performed on 9 patients with abdominal wall defects in whom surgical repair was performed immediately after birth. Areas of the abdominal cavity and exteriorized viscera were manually traced from both sagittal and axial MR images, and the data were further transmitted to a Workstation for MRI Volumetry (Advantage Windows 4.1, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). We examined the exteriorized ratio (ER), which is calculated by dividing the absolute volume of the abdominal cavity by that of the exteriorized viscera, and evaluated the predictive value by a retrospective comparison with surgical procedure. Results In the primary closure group (n = 5), mean values of ER were 0.33 ± 0.31 from axial and 0.45 ± 0.31 from sagittal MR images. In contrast, in the staged closure group (n = 4), mean values of ER were 1.39 ± 0.40 from axial and 1.34 ± 0.42 from sagittal MR images. There was a significant difference ( P < .05) between the 2 groups for both sets of images. The ER obtained from antenatal MRI correlated well with surgical procedure. Conclusions The ER might be useful for antenatal counseling, planning for delivery, and prediction of the most likely surgical procedure.

Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: A. Chilarski and M. Respondek-Liberska. Surg Childh Int. 6:15–18, (January), 1998

Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: A. Chilarski and M. Respondek-Liberska. Surg Childh Int. 6:15–18, (January), 1998

Treatment of congenital abdominal wall defects —a 25-year review of 132 patients

The outcome data of 132 patients treated at the Department of Pediatric Surgery in Mainz during the last 25 years were reviewed. Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects (AWDs) and associated malformations led to increasing selection of the patient population. The aim of primary closure of the abdominal wall can be achieved more frequently in gastroschisis (GS) than omphalocele (OC), while the postoperative course is more complicated and of longer duration in GS. Delayed or secondary closure extended the hospitalization period but had no negative effects on the outcome. Reoperations or planned secondary operations were performed in 23 patients with GS and 14 with OC. Early mortality was 15/55 for OC and 21/77 for GS over the period of 25 years. In recent years, a drastic reduction in mortality has occurred, and mortality is now mainly due to additional malformations. Further development and quality of life are not significantly reduced after survival of an isolated AWD. Malpositioning of parenchymatous organs after closure of AWDs has to be considered during pregnancy and abdominal operations.

Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects and their prognosis

To determine whether associated anatomic features may be useful in predicting fetal prognosis, 43 fetuses who had ultrasonographic evaluation for abdominal wall defects during a 13-year period were reviewed. Thirty-one fetuses had omphalocele and were classified into three groups according to fetal ultrasonography results: ruptured omphalocele with exposed liver (7), giant omphalocele with exposed liver (12), and small omphalocele without liver herniation (12). Twelve fetuses had gastroschisis. Ten of the 12 fetuses with gastroschisis survived; one died in utero. Nine of the 12 with a small omphalocele survived. Ten of 12 fetuses with giant omphalocele survived, but six of the seven with ruptured omphalocele died of pulmonary hypoplasia and respiratory insufficiency. Ruptured omphalocele recognized in utero was accompanied by intrauterine growth retardation and liver herniation and frequently was associated with deformity of the spine, diaphragmatic defects, vesicointestinal fissure, and meningocele. These results indicated that, together with the deformity of the spine, rupture and absence of the covering membrane with an exposed liver (noted through fetal ultrasonography) may suggest a poor prognosis because of pulmonary hypoplasia.

Antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: A missed opportunity?

Antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: A missed opportunity?

Antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: a missed opportunity?

A review of six years' experience with antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects by ultrasound showed its impact to be limited by poor detection rates. Twenty infants with exomphalos and 20 with gastroschisis were recorded but only 25 (63%) were diagnosed antenatally. The ultrasound false negative rate was higher for exomphalos (35%) than for gastroschisis (22%). No difference was detected in the incidence of associated abnormalities, premature gestation, primary closure rate, or mortality between the antenatally and postnatally diagnosed groups for either exomphalos or gastroschisis. Antenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis has little effect on management but allows parental counselling and in utero transfer. The frequency of concomitant abnormalities in exomphalos profoundly affects prognosis and the detection of these is the major role of antenatal diagnosis in this condition. Failure to detect abdominal wall defects by ultrasound may be a reflection of technique or equipment, but some gastroschisis may be of perinatal onset and not detectable antenatally.

Perinatal management of the fetus with an abdominal wall defect.

The antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects has allowed improved perinatal management. For fetuses with associated anomalies, the options of elective termination or minimal intervention can be offered. Our ability to predict the extent of bowel damage in gastroschisis based on the ultrasound findings enables us to offer early delivery to those fetuses who are at high risk. The data are not clear at the present time whether cesarean section offers any advantage. These fetuses should, however, be delivered at a center which is capable of providing high level medical and surgical care to these potentially ill infants. Initial resuscitation of these neonates requires early insertion of an intravenous line and a nasogastric tube, the administration of antibiotics, sterile coverage of the eviscerated bowel, and careful attention to temperature instability. Neonates with gastroschisis should be operated on as soon as they are stable, whereas infants with omphalocele can be investigated for associated anomalies prior to surgery. Primary fascial closure is performed whenever possible. Where this is not possible, a staged repair using a silastic chimney achieves closure within 3-6 days. Skin coverage alone or nonoperative management is reserved for the few cases with giant omphalocele, associated anomalies, or poor operative risk. Decisions about primary versus delayed closure, while usually dictated by clinical judgement, can be aided by indirect measurement of intraabdominal pressure. Postoperative ventilation, and consideration of long-term nutritional needs, are also important parts of the perioperative management.

Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects.

The antenatal diagnosis of omphalocele and gastroschisis is briefly reviewed, together with the major differences between the two lesions. The frequency of associated anomalies in cases of omphalocele is stressed. The controversy regarding the mode and timing of delivery is outlined.