Diabetes In Real-world Setting Research Articles

A comparison of the usage of an open-source automated insulin delivery system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in real-world settings: the AWeSoMe study group.

In recent years there has been a noticeable increase in the use of advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCLs) for managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) among youth. However, there is a lack of comparison between the open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system (780 G). In this multi-center study, we retrospectively compared selected glycemic ranges of 26 individuals who used open-source AID and 20 individuals who used 780 G (age 11.3 years [IQR 9.3, 12.9] and 13.4 years [IQR 10.9, 16.5], respectively, p = 0.069) from system initiation to the most recent visit. At baseline, the median HbA1c was significantly lower and the time below range (TBR)<54mg/dL was significantly higher in the open-source AID group compared to the 780 G group (6.8% [IQR 6.4, 7.1] vs. 7.4% [IQR 6.9, 8.6], p = 0.006 and (1.0% [IQR 0.5, 2.8] vs. 0.0% [0.0, 1.0], p = 0.014), respectively; the median time in range (TIR70-180mg/dL) was similar (p = 0.068). After a median duration of 10.9 months on AHCLs the reduction of HbA1c was similar ( ~ 0.3%). The time spent in the hypoglycemic ranges was longer among users of the open-source AID compared to 780 G (TBR54-70mg/dL 4.2% [IQR 2.6, 7.3] vs. 2.0% [1.0, 4.0], p = 0.005) and TBR<54mg/dL 1.1% [IQR 0.4, 2.3] vs. 0.0 [0.0, 1.0], p = 0.001). Both AHCLs similarly improved HbA1c and TIR70-180mg/dL. The open-source AID youth had better glycemic control but spent longer time in the hypoglycemic range. These findings must be considered when choosing the use of AHCL technologies.

Reasons for Discontinuing Treatment with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Diabetes in Real-World Settings: The KAMOGAWA-A Study.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a class of antidiabetic agents known to exert cardioprotective, renoprotective, and hypoglycemic effects. However, these agents have been associated with adverse effects, such as genital infection, volume depletion, hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis, resulting in drug discontinuation. Herein, we aimed to determine the reasons for discontinuing treatment with SGLT2is among Japanese patients with diabetes. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 766 patients with diabetes who had initiated SGLT2is between January 2014 and September 2021. The follow-up period was 2 years from the initiation of the SGLT2is. Overall, 97 patients (12.7%) discontinued the SGLT2is during the follow-up period. The most common reasons for discontinuing the SGLT2is were frequent urination (19.6%), followed by genital infection (11.3%), improved glycemic control (10.6%), and renal dysfunction (8.2%). A comparison of the characteristics between the continuation and the discontinuation group was conducted, excluding those who discontinued the SGLT2is because of improved glycemic control. The patients in the discontinuation group (68 [55-75] years) were older than those in the continuation group (64 [53-71] years; p = 0.003). Importantly, we found no significant association between diabetes duration, diabetic control, renal function, or complications of diabetes in both groups. This real-world study revealed that frequent urination was the most common reason underlying SGLT2i discontinuation among Japanese patients with diabetes. To avoid discontinuation, precautions against various factors that may cause frequent urination must be implemented.

Metabolic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia, hospitalisation and complications among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line therapy: an analysis of the Saudi Arabia data from the DISCOVER Observational Study programme

ObjectivesThe aim of the global DISCOVERing Treatment Reality of Type 2 Diabetes in Real World Settings (DISCOVER) Study was to provide a comprehensive real world assessment of the treatment pattern...

Relationship between the magnitude of body mass index reductions and remission in patients with type 2 diabetes in real world settings: Analysis of nationwide patient registry in Japan (JDDM74).

To determine the association between the magnitude of weight loss and incidence of remission according to baseline characteristics in patients with diabetes in clinical settings. In total, 39 676 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes aged ≥18 years with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% and/or glucose-lowering drug prescription were identified from databases of specialists' clinics from 1989 and followed until September 2022. Remission was diagnosed as maintaining HbA1c <6.5% at least 3 months after cessation of a glucose-lowering drug. Factors associated with remission were evaluated by logistic regression analysis according to weight change in 1 year (i.e. ≥10%, 7.0-9.9%, 3.0-6.9% reduction, <3% change and ≥3.0% increase). During the study period, 3454 remissions occurred. The rates of remission were higher in the group with the greatest reduction of body mass index (BMI) in any category examined (i.e. baseline BMI, HbA1c, duration of diabetes and treatment). The incidences of remission per 1000 person-years were about 25 and 50, respectively, for those with BMI ≥22.5 and reductions in BMI of 7.0-9.9% and ≥10% in 1 year. Remissions per 1000 person-years were 99.2 and 91.8, respectively, for those with baseline HbA1c of 6.5-6.9 and a 10% BMI reduction and those not taking glucose-lowering drugs accompanied by a 10% BMI reduction. Modest weight losses of 3.0-7.9% were significantly associated with remission, but a minimum of 10% weight loss would be required in addition to an early diagnosis to achieve a 10% remission rate in clinical settings. Our results implied that remission may be expected with a relatively lower BMI in an Asian population compared with that was reported in Western populations if accompanied by weight loss.

A randomized controlled trial of a shared decision making intervention for diabetes prevention for women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: The Gestational diabetes Risk Attenuation for New Diabetes (GRAND study)

BackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes. Metformin and lifestyle change through a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) are equally effective in preventing diabetes in patients with a GDM history, so women can choose a strategy based on their preferences. This study aims to test whether shared decision making (SDM) can help women with a history of GDM increase adoption of evidence-based strategies and lose weight to lower their risk of incident diabetes in real-world settings. MethodsThis pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) will test the effectiveness of SDM for diabetes prevention among 310 overweight/obese women with a history of GDM and prediabetes from two large health care systems (n = 155 from UCLA Health and n = 155 from Intermountain Healthcare). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who lose ≥5% body weight at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include uptake of DPP and/or metformin and other patient-reported outcomes such as patient activation and health-related quality of life. Rates of GDM in a subsequent pregnancy will be an exploratory outcome. A descriptive analysis of costs related to SDM implementation will also be conducted. ConclusionThis is the first RCT to examine the effectiveness of SDM on weight loss, lifestyle change and/or metformin use, and other patient-reported outcomes in participants with a GDM history at risk of developing diabetes.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03766256. Registered on 6 December 2018.

124-LB: Incidence and Risk Factors of Erythrocytosis following Initiation of Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Men with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Setting

Background: Analyses of prospective trials consistently demonstrated that therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) results in mild but significant increase in hematocrit (Hct) . We sought to determine if SGLT-2i therapy poses risk of erythrocytosis (ERY) in routine clinical practice. Methods: This was a retrospective study of T2D US Veterans who were prescribed an SGLT-2i and had adequate adherence based on the proportion of days covered &amp;gt;80% during 3/2013-12/2019 and baseline Hct&amp;lt;50%. ERY incidence was defined as first Hct&amp;gt;54% within 180 days of an SGLT-2i initiation. The detailed patient data were obtained using the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) database. Odds ratio (OR) of ERY risk was calculated by logistic regression models adjusted for case-mix. Results: We identified 9402 patients (76.0% Whites/14.7% Blacks) with baseline mean±SD age 65.0±8.9 yrs, BMI 34.1±6.3 kg/m2, Hct 41.5±4.1 % and hemoglobin A1c 8.5±1.2 %. By the end of observation period, mean Hct increased from the baseline by 1.74% [95% CI 1.68-1.80] in the entire cohort and 61 patients (0.65% of the cohort) developed ERY. We found that BMI, tobacco use, or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were not associated with risk of developing ERY. However, concomitant use of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) was associated with significant ERY risk compared with SGLT-2i users not on TRT in both unadjusted analyses (OR 12.28 [95% CI 5.29-25.10]) and after adjustments for age, race, BMI, OSA, and tobacco use (OR 7.26 [95% CI 2.95-16.04]) . The risk of ERY was independent of baseline Hct or modality of TRT (topical vs. injectable) . Conclusions: For the first time, we demonstrated that SGLT-2i initiation in men with T2D in real world clinical setting can result in detectable risk of erythrocytosis. It appears that concomitant TRT can significantly influence that risk. We recommend monitoring for Hct changes following SGLT-2i initiation and, particularly, in those persons who receive testosterone therapy. Disclosure A. R. Gosmanov: Research Support; AbbVie Inc., Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Speaker’s Bureau; AstraZeneca. D. E. Gemoets: None. M. A. Green: None. K. Schumacher: None.

ARISE-a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study assessing clinical parameters associated with the use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings: rationale and design.

PurposeIDegAsp, a co-formulation of long-acting basal (insulin degludec) and rapid-acting bolus (insulin aspart) insulin, provides separate prandial and basal glucose-lowering effects with relatively low risk of hypoglycaemia. Its efficacy and safety have been investigated in a large clinical trial programme (BOOST). We present the rationale and design of the ARISE study, which aims to assess glycaemic control and other clinical parameters associated with IDegAsp use in real world.MethodsARISE is a ~26-wk-long, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating IDegAsp treatment. Approximately 1112 patients with T2D aged ≥18 years previously on anti-hyperglycaemic drugs except IDegAsp will be enroled across six countries from 15 Aug 2019 to 12 Nov 2020. IDegAsp treatment will be initiated at the physicians’ discretion and as per the local label. Key exclusion criteria include previous participation, or previous IDegAsp treatment. The primary and secondary endpoints are change in HbA1c from baseline (wk 0) to study end (wk 26–36) and the proportion of patients achieving the target HbA1c level of <7% at the study end, respectively. A mixed model for repeated measurements will analyse the primary endpoint.ConclusionBetween-country differences in the prescription patterns of glucose-lowering agents in people with T2D warrant examination of their clinical use in different geographical settings. The ARISE study is designed to assess the clinical use of IDegAsp from real world in six different countries. Findings from the ARISE study will supplement those of previous randomised controlled studies by establishing real-world evidence of IDegAsp use in the participating countries.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04042441. Registered 02 August 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04042441

High Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in Developing Countries: Results From the International Diabetes Management Practices Study.

OBJECTIVEDepression is common in people with diabetes, but data from developing countries are scarce. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes using data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIDMPS is an ongoing multinational, cross-sectional study investigating quality of care in patients with diabetes in real-world settings. Data from wave 5 (2011), including 21 countries, were analyzed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to evaluate depressive symptoms. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors of depressive symptoms.RESULTSOf 9,865 patients eligible for analysis, 2,280 had type 1 and 7,585 had type 2 diabetes (treatment: oral glucose-lowering drugs [OGLD] only, n = 4,729; OGLDs plus insulin, n = 1,892; insulin only, n = 964). Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥5) were reported in 30.7% of those with type 1 diabetes. In patients with type 2 diabetes, the respective figures were 29.0% for OGLDs-only, 36.6% for OGLDs-plus-insulin, and 46.7% for insulin-only subgroups. Moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score 10–19) were observed in 8–16% of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Female sex, complications, and low socioeconomic status were independently associated with depressive symptoms. In type 1 diabetes and in the type 2 diabetes OGLDs-only group, depression was associated with poor glycemic control.CONCLUSIONSDepressive symptoms are common in patients with diabetes from developing countries, calling for routine screening, especially in high-risk groups, to reduce the double burden of diabetes and depression and their negative interaction.

Efficacy and safety of liraglutide therapy in 195 Indian patients with type 2 diabetes in real world setting

BackgroundGLP-1 analogues has established role in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue is used as an adjunct to diet and exercise in adults with T2DM for improvement of glycemic control. ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in Indian patients with T2DM in real-world setting. MethodsA prospective, open label, single arm, single centre, observational study of 24 weeks duration in a real-world setting. Subjects with T2DM with impaired glucose control despite of antidiabetic therapy and clinically suitable for liraglutide therapy were enrolled and managed. All subjects received liraglutide therapy in addition to their existing anti-diabetic therapy. Starting dose of liraglutide (Victoza) was 0.6mg/day for 7 days followed by 1.2mg/day for next 7 days and finally 1.8mg/day for 22 weeks. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and at 24 weeks. Adverse events (AE) noted during course of therapy were recorded. Student t test (two tailed, dependent) was performed for assessment of statistical significance. ResultsTotal 195 subjects were studied over 24 weeks. Mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was decreased from 163.81mg/dL to 111.6 (P<0.001); similarly HbA1c was reduced from 8.14% to 6.96% (P=0.006) at 24 weeks. At week 24, 49.23% and 41.03% subjects treated with liraglutide reached an HbA1c<7.0% and ≤6.5%, respectively. Mean weight was reduced from 86.41kg to 82.37kg (P<0.001). Additionally mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 129.31 and 76.18mm of Hg to 119.59 (P=0.90) and 70.88 (P<0.001) mm of Hg, respectively. Serum cholesterol was reduced from 166.68mg/dL to 124.86mg/dL (P<0.001). Twenty-two (11.28%) subjects reported adverse events (AE), the most common AEs being vomiting, tiredness, loose motion and nausea. All AEs were mild to moderate in nature without any serious AE. ConclusionIn 195 Indian patients with T2DM receiving anti-diabetic drugs, addition of liraglutide resulted in significant improvement in glycemic parameters and was well tolerated. Clinically significant reduction in weight, blood pressure and serum cholesterol were also noted.

Diabetes Prevention in the Real World: Effectiveness of Pragmatic Lifestyle Interventions for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and of the Impact of Adherence to Guideline Recommendations

OBJECTIVE To summarize the evidence on effectiveness of translational diabetes prevention programs, based on promoting lifestyle change to prevent type 2 diabetes in real-world settings and to examine whether adherence to international guideline recommendations is associated with effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Bibliographic databases were searched up to July 2012. Included studies had a follow-up of ≥12 months and outcomes comparing change in body composition, glycemic control, or progression to diabetes. Lifestyle interventions aimed to translate evidence from previous efficacy trials of diabetes prevention into real-world intervention programs. Data were combined using random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression considering the relationship between intervention effectiveness and adherence to guidelines. RESULTS Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary meta-analysis included 22 studies (24 study groups) with outcome data for weight loss at 12 months. The pooled result of the direct pairwise meta-analysis shows that lifestyle interventions resulted in a mean weight loss of 2.12 kg (95% CI -2.61 to -1.63; I(2) = 91.4%). Adherence to guidelines was significantly associated with a greater weight loss (an increase of 0.3 kg per point increase on a 12-point guideline-adherence scale). CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that pragmatic diabetes prevention programs are effective. Effectiveness varies substantially between programs but can be improved by maximizing guideline adherence. However, more research is needed to establish optimal strategies for maximizing both cost-effectiveness and longer-term maintenance of weight loss and diabetes prevention effects.

Self‐reported non‐severe hypoglycaemic events in Europe

AimsHypoglycaemia presents a barrier to optimum diabetes management but data are limited on the frequency of hypoglycaemia incidents outside of clinical trials. The present study investigated the rates of self-reported non-severe hypoglycaemic events, hypoglycaemia awareness and physician discussion of events in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus or insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsPeople in seven European countries aged >15 years with Type 1 diabetes or insulin–treated Type 2 diabetes (basal-only, basal-bolus and other insulin regimens) were recruited via consumer panels, nurses, telephone recruitment and family referrals. Respondents completed four online questionnaires. The first questionnaire collected background information on demographics and hypoglycaemia-related behaviour, whilst all four questionnaires collected data on non-severe hypoglycaemic events in the preceding 7 days.ResultsAnalysis was based on 11 440 respondent-weeks from 3827 respondents. All participants completed the first questionnaire and 57% completed all four. The mean number of events/respondent–week was 1.8 (Type 1 diabetes) and 0.4–0.7 (Type 2 diabetes, with different insulin treatments) corresponding to annual event rates of 94 and 21–36, respectively. A total of 63% of respondents with Type 1 diabetes and 49–64% of respondents with Type 2 diabetes, treated with different insulin regimens, who experienced hypoglycaemic events, reported impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or unawareness. A high proportion of respondents rarely or never informed their general practitioner/specialist about hypoglycaemia: 65% (Type 1 diabetes) and 50–59% (Type 2 diabetes). Overall, 16% of respondents with Type 1 diabetes and 26% of respondents with Type 2 diabetes reported not being asked about hypoglycaemia during routine appointments.ConclusionNon-severe hypoglycaemic events are common amongst people with Type 1 diabetes and insulin–treated Type 2 diabetes in real-world settings. Many rarely or never inform their general practitioner/specialist about their hypoglycaemia and the real burden of hypoglycaemia may be underestimated.

Low risk of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting insulin therapy with premixed insulin analogues BID in outpatient settings

The choice of insulin at initiation in type 2 diabetes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of self-reported severe hypoglycaemia associated with premixed insulin analogues in routine clinical care. A 12-month, prospective, observational, multicentre study in patients starting a commonly prescribed premixed insulin analogue (either insulin lispro 25/75 or biphasic insulin aspart 30/70, twice daily) after suboptimal glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic agents. Treatment decisions were made solely in the course of usual practice. Study follow-up was completed by 991 (85.5%) of the 1150 patients enrolled. At baseline, mean (SD) age was 57.9 (10.1) years; mean diabetes duration was 9.2 (5.9) years; mean haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) was 9.9 (1.8) % and the rate of severe hypoglycaemia was 0.03 episode/patient-year. At 12 months, the rate of severe hypoglycaemia was 0.04 episode/patient-year (95% CI 0.023, 0.055 episode/patient-year) and mean insulin dose was 41.5 (19.4) units. Changes from baseline to 12 months for mean fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) were -5.1 mmol/l and -2.5%, respectively. After initiation of premixed insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings, the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was lower than expected from previously reported studies.

Liraglutide therapy beyond glycemic control: an observational study in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes in real world setting.

Liraglutide is an analog of human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and acts as a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Liraglutide is presently used in the treatment of selected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To assess efficacy and safety of liraglutide in, overweight and obese Indian patients with T2DM. A single center, prospective, open-labeled, single-arm, observational study for 24 weeks in a real-world setting. Fourteen overweight and obese patients with T2DM who were clinically suitable for liraglutide therapy received liraglutide injections. The starting dose of liraglutide (Victoza) injection was 0.6 mg/day for 3 days followed by 1.2 mg for next 10 days and finally 1.8 mg/day for 22 weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of therapy. Adverse events (AE) noted during course of therapy were recorded. A repeated measure analysis of variance was performed to assess statistical significance. Fourteen patients were studied for 24 weeks. After 24 weeks of liraglutide therapy, mean fasting and postprandial plasma glucose decreased by 48.5 mg/dL and 66.71 mg/dL, respectively (P = 0.002 and P = 0004 over 24 weeks, respectively). A mean reduction of 2.26% of glycosylated hemoglobin was noted (P < 0.001 over 24 weeks). Mean decrease in body weight of 8.65 kg and mean decrease in body mass index of 3.26 kg/m(2) was noted (P < 0.001 over 24 weeks for each parameter). Systolic blood pressure was reduced by 15.15 mm of Hg (P = 0.004). Significant improvement in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and serum creatinine was noted. Nine patients reported AEs. The AEs noticed were nausea (n = 6), feeling of satiety (n = 3), and vomiting (n = 1). No serious AE or hypoglycemic episodes were observed. Liraglutide once a day improved overall glycemic control and was well tolerated. Clinically significant reduction in body weight, systolic blood pressure and improvement in lipid profile were noticed with liraglutide therapy in addition to glycemic control.