Dexmedetomidine Concentrations Research Articles

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Rats by Blocking the Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Current.

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using lidocaine provides effective localized analgesia but its duration is limited. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine enhances lidocaine IVRA is unclear but may involve modulation of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. Lidocaine IVRA with varying dexmedetomidine concentrations was performed in the tails of Sprague-Dawley rats. Tail-flick and tail-clamping tests assessed IVRA analgesia and anesthesia efficacy and duration. Contributions of α2 adrenergic receptors and HCN channels were evaluated by incorporating an α adrenergic receptor antagonist, the HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288, and the HCN channel agonist forskolin. Furthermore, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology quantified the effects of dexmedetomidine on HCN channels mediating hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently extended lidocaine IVRA duration and analgesia, unaffected by α2 receptor blockade. The HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288 also prolonged lidocaine IVRA effects, while the HCN channel activator forskolin shortened effects. In dorsal root ganglion neurons, dexmedetomidine concentration-dependently inhibited Ih amplitude and shifted the voltage-dependence of HCN channel activation. Dexmedetomidine prolongs lidocaine IVRA duration by directly inhibiting HCN channel activity, independent of α2 adrenergic receptor activation. This HCN channel inhibition represents a novel mechanism underlying the anesthetic and analgesic adjuvant effects of dexmedetomidine in IVRA.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing sedation after abdominal aortic surgery

Background. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a widely used sedative agent for treating post-surgery patients. It also acts on hemodynamic parameters like heart rate or cardiac output. This study aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of DEX using bispectral index (BIS) and cardiac output (CO) as a response. Methodology and results. 21 mechanically ventilated elderly cardiac patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery were enrolled in the study. DEX was given to maintain moderate or deep sedation. Genotypes of ADR2A*55 were identified using real-time PCR-HRM. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. A two-compartment model described DEX pharmacokinetics. The sigmoid Emax and linear models were used to describe BIS and CO measurements. The typical value of EC50 for DEX effects on BIS was 3.62 ng/ml, and the slope between CO and DEX concentrations was 0.819 (L/min)/(ng/ml). We were unable to show the effects of considered covariates on DEX pharmacodynamics. Conclusions. WE proposed the PK/PD model of DEX to understand better the BIS and CO changes observed after surgery. The measured CI values were in the reference range showing that the used doses of DEX ensured stable cardiac function in the studied patients.

Dexmedetomidine protects gastric mucosal epithelial cells against ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis by inhibiting HMGB1-mediated inflammation and oxidative stress

Purpose: To investigate the role of dexmedetomidine in gastric ischemia/reperfusion injury using gastric mucosal epithelial cell (GES-1) model.
 Methods: GES-1 were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation conditions, followed by increasing dexmedetomidine concentrations (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 μM) for 4 h of reoxygenation. Cell viability and apoptosis were determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide and flow cytometry, respectively. Oxidative stress and inflammation were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
 Results: Oxygen-glucose deprivation conditions induced cytotoxicity in GES-1 by decreasing cell viability and increasing apoptosis. Dexmedetomidine treatment significantly increased the cell viability of hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced GES-1 (p < 0.01) but reduced apoptosis. Dexmedetomidine also attenuated the hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced increase in malondialdehyde and myeloperoxidase, but the decrease in superoxide dismutase and glutathione in GES-1. Moreover, upregulated tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-18 in hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced GES-1 was downregulated by dexmedetomidine treatment. Dexmedetomidine also enhanced IL-10 levels and inhibited proinflammatory factor production (p < 0.01). High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein in GES-1 was upregulated by hypoxia/reoxygenation but decreased by dexmedetomidine. HMGB1 over-expression attenuated the dexmedetomidine-induced increase in cell viability and the decrease in apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammation in hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced GES-1 (p < 0.01). 
 Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine protects GES-1 against ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress by inhibiting HMGB1, thus providing a potential strategy for treating gastric ischemia/reperfusion injury.
 Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; gastric mucosal epithelial cells; Ischemia/reperfusion; Apoptosis; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)

This Month in Anesthesiology

This Month in Anesthesiology

Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine or phenylephrine on the prevention of hypotension in isoflurane-anesthetized cats administered vatinoxan or vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine

ObjectiveTo determine the dose of phenylephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine necessary to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 70–80 mmHg during administration of isoflurane, isoflurane and vatinoxan and isoflurane, vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine at three plasma concentrations. Study designRandomized crossover experimental study. AnimalsA group of five adult healthy neutered male cats. MethodsInstrumentation occurred during anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen. Isoflurane end-tidal concentration was set to 1.25 × minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Phenylephrine, norepinephrine or dopamine was administered to maintain MAP 70–80 mmHg. A target-controlled infusion system was used to administer vatinoxan at a target plasma concentration of 1 μg mL–1 and three dexmedetomidine concentrations (5, 10 and 20 ng mL–1). Isoflurane concentration was altered to maintain an equivalent 1.25 MAC. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, body temperature, arterial and mixed venous blood gas, cardiac output and drug concentrations were measured at baseline (isoflurane alone), during vatinoxan administration, and during administration of vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine at the three target concentrations. ResultsMAP < 70 mmHg was observed with vatinoxan alone and in the dopamine treatment with dexmedetomidine concentrations ≤ 10 ng mL–1. Norepinephrine and phenylephrine maintained MAP 70–80 mmHg during vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine ≤ 10 ng mL–1. As the target dexmedetomidine concentration increased, the dose of norepinephrine and phenylephrine needed to maintain MAP 70–80 mmHg decreased; no treatment was necessary to maintain MAP > 70 mmHg at the 20 ng mL–1 target dexmedetomidine concentration in most cats. Conclusions and clinical relevanceNorepinephrine and phenylephrine, but not dopamine, are effective to prevent hypotension in isoflurane-anesthetized cats administered dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan.

Dexmedetomidine does not compromise neuronal viability, synaptic connectivity, learning and memory in a rodent model

Recent animal studies have drawn concerns regarding most commonly used anesthetics and their long-term cytotoxic effects, specifically on the nervous tissue. It is therefore imperative that the search continues for agents that are non-toxic at both the cellular and behavioural level. One such agent appears to be dexmedetomidine (DEX) which has not only been found to be less neurotoxic but has also been shown to protect neurons from cytotoxicity induced by other anesthetic agents. However, DEX’s effects on the growth and synaptic connectivity at the individual neuronal level, and the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully resolved. Here, we tested DEX for its impact on neuronal growth, synapse formation (in vitro) and learning and memory in a rodent model. Rat cortical neurons were exposed to a range of clinically relevant DEX concentrations (0.05–10 µM) and cellular viability, neurite outgrowth, synaptic assembly and mitochondrial morphology were assessed. We discovered that DEX did not affect neuronal viability when used below 10 µM, whereas significant cell death was noted at higher concentrations. Interestingly, in the presence of DEX, neurons exhibited more neurite branching, albeit with no differences in corresponding synaptic puncta formation. When rat pups were injected subcutaneously with DEX 25 µg/kg on postnatal day 7 and again on postnatal day 8, we discovered that this agent did not affect hippocampal-dependent memory in freely behaving animals. Our data demonstrates, for the first time, the non-neurotoxic nature of DEX both in vitro and in vivo in an animal model providing support for its utility as a safer anesthetic agent. Moreover, this study provides the first direct evidence that although DEX is growth permissive, causes mitochondrial fusion and reduces oxygen reactive species production, it does not affect the total number of synaptic connections between the cortical neurons in vitro.

Effects of perineural administration of ropivacaine combined with perineural or intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks in dogs.

To evaluate the effects of using ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine for sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks in dogs. 7 healthy adult Beagles. In phase 1, dogs received each of the following 3 treatments in random order: perineural sciatic and saphenous nerve injections of 0.5% ropivacaine (0.4 mL/kg) mixed with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (0.04 mL/kg; DEX0PN), 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg; DEX1PN), and 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg; DEX2PN). In phase 2, dogs received perineural sciatic and saphenous nerve injections of 0.5% ropivacaine and an IV injection of diluted dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg; DEX1IV). For perineural injections, the dose was divided equally between the 2 sites. Duration of sensory blockade was evaluated, and plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were measured. Duration of sensory blockade was significantly longer with DEX1PN and DEX2PN, compared with DEX0PN; DEX1IV did not prolong duration of sensory blockade, compared with DEX0PN. Peak plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were reached after 15 minutes with DEX1PN (mean ± SD, 348 ± 200 pg/mL) and after 30 minutes DEX2PN (816 ± 607 pg/mL), and bioavailability was 54 ± 40% and 73 ± 43%, respectively. The highest plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was measured with DEX1IV (1,032 ± 415 pg/mL) 5 minutes after injection. Results suggested that perineural injection of 0.5% ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) for locoregional anesthesia in dogs seemed to balance the benefit of prolonging sensory nerve blockade while minimizing adverse effects.

High-Dose Dexmedetomidine Promotes Apoptosis in Fetal Rat Hippocampal Neurons.

ObjectiveDexmedetomidine (DEX) is a potent a2-adrenoceptor agonist that has sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic effects. Its primary clinical use is as an adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce anesthetic doses, provide analgesia and sedation in the preoperative and postoperative periods, it also used in intensive care units (ICUs). However, high concentrations of DEX may have toxic effects on neurons and cause neuronal apoptosis. This study aimed to evaluate the potential proapoptotic effects of DEX on fetal rat hippocampal neurons.MethodsPrimary hippocampal were cultured in vitro for 8 days and incubated with different DEX concentrations for 3 h. Cell viability was measured using cell counting kit-8 assays. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using flow cytometry. The expression of apoptosis-related proteins, such as cleaved caspase-3, caspase-9, Cyt-c, Bax, and Bcl-2, was measured by Western blotting. The mitochondrial ATP levels, Δψm, and ROS analyzed were conducted.ResultsHigh concentrations of DEX (≥100 μM) significantly reduced cell viability, induced neuronal apoptosis, upregulated the protein expression of cleaved caspase 3, Bax, cleaved caspase 9, and Cyt-c. DEX also considerably promoted the release of ROS. However, DEX (≥100 μM) downregulated the protein expression of Bcl-2, decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential (MTP), and reduced ATP synthesis.ConclusionHigh concentrations of dexmedetomidine produced toxic effects on neurons and caused neuronal apoptosis.

Dexmedetomidine reverses MTX-induced neurotoxicity and inflammation in hippocampal HT22 cell lines via NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy.

The incidence of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) has attracted massive attention. Some studies have demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX). Here, alterations in nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4)-mediated ferritinophagy were investigated as the possible causes of DEX’s neuroprotection of HT22 cells against methotrexate (MTX)-induced neurotoxicity. We used various concentrations of DEX and NCOA4-siRNA to treat MTX-induced neurotoxicity and inflammation in HT22 cells. The biomarkers of HT22 cells viability, apoptosis and inflammatory were tested. The expression of ferritinophagy markers were detected in the HT22 cells by using western blot and Immunofluorescence. We found that 10 and 50 ng/mL of DEX alleviated MTX-induced hippocampal neuronal inflammatory injuries. Meanwhile, DEX also reversed MTX-induced iron and ROS overproduction. Increasing DEX concentrations caused significant falls in the expression of ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1). DEX also increased vital ferritinophagy markers, NCOA4 and LC3II. NCOA4-siRNA transfection annulled the neuroprotective effects of DEX on MTX-induced inflammation in HT22 cells. Additionally, because NCOA4-siRNA disrupted ferritinophagy, DEX’s inhibitory impact on MTX-induced iron and ROS overproduction in HT22 cells was also annihilated. DEX weakened MTX-provoked neurontoxicity in HT22 cells, possibly by improving NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy. Our discoveries present further mechanisms for understanding the protective effects of DEX against MTX-induced cognitive impairment.

Combined effects of dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan infusions on minimum alveolar concentration and cardiopulmonary function in sevoflurane-anesthetized dogs

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of combined infusions of vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine on inhalant anesthetic requirement and cardiopulmonary function in dogs. Study designProspective experimental study. MethodsA total of six Beagle dogs were anesthetized to determine sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) prior to and after an intravenous (IV) dose (loading, then continuous infusion) of dexmedetomidine (4.5 μg kg–1 hour–1) and after two IV doses of vatinoxan in sequence (90 and 180 μg kg–1 hour–1). Blood was collected for plasma dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan concentrations. During a separate anesthesia, cardiac output (CO) was measured under equivalent MAC conditions of sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine, and then with each added dose of vatinoxan. For each treatment, cardiovascular variables were measured with spontaneous and controlled ventilation. Repeated measures analyses were performed for each response variable; for all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsDexmedetomidine reduced sevoflurane MAC by 67% (0.64 ± 0.1%), mean ± standard deviation in dogs. The addition of vatinoxan attenuated this to 57% (0.81 ± 0.1%) and 43% (1.1 ± 0.1%) with low and high doses, respectively, and caused a reduction in plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations. Heart rate and CO decreased while systemic vascular resistance increased with dexmedetomidine regardless of ventilation mode. The co-administration of vatinoxan dose-dependently modified these effects such that cardiovascular variables approached baseline. Conclusions and clinical relevanceIV infusions of 90 and 180 μg kg–1 hour–1 of vatinoxan combined with 4.5 μg kg–1 hour–1 dexmedetomidine provide a meaningful reduction in sevoflurane requirement in dogs. Although sevoflurane MAC-sparing properties of dexmedetomidine in dogs are attenuated by vatinoxan, the cardiovascular function is improved. Doses of vatinoxan >180 μg kg–1 hour–1 might improve cardiovascular function further in combination with this dose of dexmedetomidine, but beneficial effects on anesthesia plane and recovery quality may be lost.

Determination of dexmedetomidine using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) assay combined with microdialysis technique: Application to a pharmacokinetic study

Dexmedetomidine, as a safe sedative, mainly exerts on the central nervous system particularly in the locus coeruleus producing arousable sedation with potential analgesic and anxiolytic effects. The quantification and pharmacokinetic investigation of dexmedetomidine in the central nervous system have been described rarely. In order to estimate the unbound dexmedetomidine concentrations in brain extracellular fluid and blood simultaneously, we employed microdialysis technique as a sampling method and primarily established a rapid, sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC-MS/MS). Dexmedetomidine and the internal standard (dexmedetomidine-d4) were extracted in liquid–liquid extraction procedure with ethyl acetate from 10 μL of alkalinized microdialysate sample. After evaporation under nitrogen at room temperature, the analytes were reconstituted in acetonitrile and transferred to be detected. HPLC was performed on an Agilent Poroshell 120 Hilic column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.7 μm) with isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min by 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile (60:40, v/v). The detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the respective [M+H]+ ions m/z 201.2 to m/z 95.1 for DEX and m/z 205.2 to m/z 99.1 for IS (DEX-d4). The concentration–response relationship was of good linearity over a concentration range of 1.00–1000.00 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient above 0.999. The lower limit of quantification was 1.00 ng/mL with a relative standard deviation of less than 20%. The intra- and inter-day accuracy were within ±5.00% and precision was <7.23%. The recoveries of dexmedetomidine in microdialysates were 76.61–93.38%. The validated HPLC-MS/MS method has been successfully applied to study the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in rats after a caudal vein administration.

Population analysis to assess the influence of age and body weight on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine in New Zealand White rabbits.

The purpose of this work was i) to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) model of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in New Zealand White rabbits, ii) to investigate the influence of the age and weight of the animals on the model parameters, and iii) to assess the linearity of DEX PKs in the examined dose range. This was a prospective, crossover study, using a total of 18 New Zealand White rabbits. DEX was administered as a single intravenous bolus injection in the doses from 25 to 300 μg kg-1 . Each New Zealand White rabbit was given the same dose of drug in its three developmental stages. To determine the DEX PK, seven blood samples were taken from each animal. The pedal withdrawal reflex was the PD response used to assess the degree of sedation. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used for the population PK/PD analysis. The typical value of elimination clearance was 0.061 L min-1 and was 35% higher in younger New Zealand White rabbits compared with older animals. The PK of DEX was linear in the examined concentration range. Age-related changes in sensitivity to DEX were not detected. The results suggest that due to the pharmacokinetics, younger animals will have lower DEX concentrations and a shorter duration of sedation than older animals given the same doses of DEX per kg of body weight.

Investigation of the effects of vatinoxan on somatic and visceral antinociceptive efficacy of medetomidine in dogs

To determine whether concurrent vatinoxan administration affects the antinociceptive efficacy of medetomidine in dogs at doses that provide circulating dexmedetomidine concentrations similar to those produced by medetomidine alone. 8 healthy Beagles. Dogs received 3 IV treatments in a randomized crossover-design trial with a 2-week washout period between experiments (medetomidine [20 μg/kg], medetomidine [20 μg/kg] and vatinoxan [400 μg/kg], and medetomidine [40 μg/kg] and vatinoxan [800 μg/kg]; M20, M20V400, and M40V800, respectively). Sedation, visceral and somatic nociception, and plasma drug concentrations were assessed. Somatic and visceral nociception measurements and sedation scores were compared among treatments and over time. Sedation, visceral antinociception, and somatic antinociception effects of M20V400 and M40V800 were analyzed for noninferiority to effects of M20, and plasma drug concentration data were assessed for equivalence between treatments. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations after administration of M20 and M40V800 were equivalent. Sedation scores, visceral nociception measurements, and somatic nociception measurements did not differ significantly among treatments within time points. Overall sedative effects of M20V400 and M40V800 and visceral antinociceptive effects of M40V800 were noninferior to those produced by M20. Somatic antinociception effects of M20V400 at 10 minutes and M40V800 at 10 and 55 minutes after injection were noninferior to those produced by M20. Results suggested coadministration with vatinoxan did not substantially diminish visceral antinociceptive effects of medetomidine when plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were equivalent to those produced by medetomidine alone. For somatic antinociception, noninferiority of treatments was detected at some time points.

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine during administration of vatinoxan in male neutered cats anesthetized with isoflurane

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, and vatinoxan is an alpha-2 antagonist believed to poorly cross the blood-brain barrier in cats. Dexmedetomidine-vatinoxan combinations are of interest in anesthetized cats because the anesthetic sparing effect of dexmedetomidine may be preserved while vatinoxan attenuates the adverse cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in cats during administration of isoflurane and vatinoxan. Six healthy adult male castrated cats were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Vatinoxan was administered using a target-controlled infusion system intended to maintain a plasma concentration of 4 µg/ml. Dexmedetomidine, 35 µg/kg was administered intravenously over 5 min. Plasma dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan concentrations were measured at selected time points ranging from prior to 8 hr after dexmedetomidine administration using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to the time-concentration data using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. A three-compartment model best fitted the data. Typical value (% interindividual variability) for the three-compartment volumes (ml/kg), the metabolic clearance and the two intercompartment distribution clearances (ml min-1 kg-1 ) were 168 (259), 318 (35), 1,425 (18), 12.4 (31), 39.1 (18), and 29.6 (17), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation plasma vatinoxan concentration was 2.6 ± 0.6 µg/ml.

Physicochemical Compatibility of Dexmedetomidine With Parenteral Nutrition.

Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist used as a sedative agent in the intensive care setting. Simultaneous administration of dexmedetomidine and parenteral nutrition (PN) may be required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical compatibility of dexmedetomidine Y-site administered with PN. Three PN and 3 dexmedetomidine solutions were compounded. The tested infusion rate for PN was 66mL/h. For dexmedetomidine, we considered the initial and maximum infusion rates (0.7 and 1.4 µg/kg/h) detailed in the data sheet. Taking this into account and considering a weight range of 55-95 kg, we tested 2 dexmedetomidine infusion rates (10 and 36mL/h). The samples obtained were examined visually against light. pH was analyzed with a pH meter. Mean fat droplet diameter was determined by dynamic light scattering. Quantification of dexmedetomidine concentration was carried out by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. For each PN-dexmedetomidine admixture, tests were performed in triplicate. No alterations were observed by visual inspection. Average pH was 6.25±0.01. Droplet diameter remained below 500 nm (298±10 nm for 10-mL/h rate and 303±5 nm for 36-mL/h rate). Dexmedetomidine concentrations at t=0 were 519±31ng/mL and 1391±90ng/mL for 10- and 36-mL/h infusion rates, respectively. At t=24 hours, the concentrations obtained were 494±22 and 1332±102ng/mL, which translates into ≥90% of the initial concentrations. Dexmedetomidine is physicochemically compatible with PN during simulated Y-site administration at the tested infusion rates.

Cardiopulmonary effects of dexmedetomidine, with and without vatinoxan, in isoflurane-anesthetized cats

ObjectiveTo characterize the cardiopulmonary effects of dexmedetomidine, with or without vatinoxan, in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Study designRandomized, crossover experimental study. AnimalsA group of six adult healthy male neutered cats. MethodsCats were instrumented during anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen. Isoflurane end-tidal concentration was set to 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Dexmedetomidine was administered using a target-controlled infusion system to achieve and maintain 10 target plasma concentrations ranging from 0 to 40 ng mL–1. Furthermore, vatinoxan or an equivalent volume of saline was administered using a target-controlled infusion system to achieve and maintain a target plasma concentration of 4 μg mL–1. Isoflurane concentration was adjusted after each change in dexmedetomidine concentration to maintain a concentration equivalent to 1.25 MAC. Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), body temperature, cardiac output, arterial and mixed-venous blood gas and pH and drug concentrations were measured. Additional variables were calculated from the measurements. ResultsDexmedetomidine alone resulted in decreased HR, cardiac index, stroke index and oxygen delivery, and increased systolic, mean (MAP) and diastolic arterial pressure, CVP, PAP, PAOP, systemic vascular resistance index, rate-pressure product, left ventricular stroke work index and oxygen extraction ratio. Vatinoxan resulted in severe hypotension at target plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations <10 ng mL–1. Vatinoxan attenuated the cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine at the 10 and 20 ng mL–1 targets, but MAP could be maintained above 60 mmHg only when isoflurane concentration was <1.25 MAC. Less improvement in cardiovascular function was seen with vatinoxan at the 40 ng mL–1 target plasma dexmedetomidine concentration. Conclusions and clinical relevanceVatinoxan, at the plasma concentration maintained in this study, attenuated the cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. However, its administration resulted in hypotension, which may limit its clinical usefulness.

Neurocognitive performance under combined regimens of ketamine-dexmedetomidine and ketamine-fentanyl in healthy adults: A randomised trial

Analgesic doses of ketamine affects neurocognition; however, deficits under co-administration regimens are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of ketamine, alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl on neurocognition. Using a randomised, within-subjects gender stratified design, 39 participants (mean age = 28.4, SD ± 5.8) received a ketamine bolus of 0.3 mg/kg followed by 0.15 mg/kg/h infusion of ketamine (3 h duration). At 1.5 h post-ketamine infusion commencement, participants received either: i) 0.7 μg/kg/h infusion of dexmedetomidine (n = 19) (KET/DEX) or (ii) three 25 μg fentanyl injections over 1.5 h (n = 20) (KET/FENT). Reaction and Movement time (RTI, Simple and 5Choice), Visuospatial Working Memory (SWM) and Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) were assessed using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Whole blood drug concentrations were determined during ketamine-only infusion, at co-administration (KET/DEX or KET/FENT) and at 2-h post-treatment. Ketamine-only administration impaired psychomotor response speed (Simple and 5Choice) and impaired memory (all p < .001), however did not alter executive function abilities. Independent of sedation, co-administration of dexmedetomidine produced synergistic performance and memory deficits which persisted at post-treatment (KET/DEX) (all p < .001), and were comparatively greater than for KET/FENT (all p < .05). Ketamine, norketamine and dexmedetomidine concentrations were modestly associated with reduced psychomotor speed and accuracy (all p < .05), and an inverse relationship was found between blood concentrations of ketamine, norketamine and dexmedetomidine and performance on memory tasks. Co-administration of ketamine with dexmedetomidine but not with fentanyl exerts synergistic effects on psychomotor performance and memory without executive dysfunction. Assessment of these effects in clinical groups is warranted.

Maternal and neonatal wellbeing during elective C-section induced with a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine: How effective is the placental barrier in dogs?

Anaesthetics administered during C-section (CS) can cross the placenta and the foetal blood-brain barrier contributing to distress up to neonatal mortality. Therefore, to prevent neonatal risks, sedatives and analgesics are not commonly administered to the bitch until all pups are delivered. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a new anaesthetic and analgesic protocol for elective CS in dogs, focused on both maternal and neonatal wellbeing. General anaesthesia was induced by a combination of propofol (PPF) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) and maintained with isoflurane. DEX was added to PPF in order to provide analgesia and to reduce PPF dose. Propofol and DEX concentrations in maternal blood, amniotic fluid, and placenta were correlated to maternal and neonatal parameters. Maternal pain score was assessed with Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale short-form. Nine healthy purebred dogs scheduled for elective CS delivered 54 pups. The 77.8% of pups were vigorous at birth and assigned to the highest Apgar score (AS). The lowest AS was recorded in pups from mothers receiving additional doses of PPF (p < 0.001). Apgar scores improved with the increase in time between induction and pups' extraction, starting from 30 min after induction (p < 0.01). This study could contribute to clarify the controversy about the optimal extraction's time of pups after induction i.e. the best time between PPF administration and birth. No bitch showed post-operative pain or required additional analgesic doses based on their pain score. Maternal blood PPF and DEX, as well as placental PPF concentrations, decreased over time (p < 0.01). Conversely, placental DEX was fair uniformly detected in littermate pups. Both PPF and DEX were not detectable in amniotic fluid. Placenta resulted an effective barrier against foetal DEX exposure, making this protocol safe, analgesic and advisable for elective CS in dogs.

The pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in patients with obstructive jaundice: A clinical trial.

ObjectivesDexmedetomidine, a highly selective central α2-agonist, undergoes mainly biotransformation in the liver. The pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine were significantly affected by hepatic insufficiency. The clearance of dexmedetomidine in patients with severe hepatic failure decreased by 50% compared with controls. We tested the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine would be affected by obstructive jaundice. The prospective registration number of clinical trial is ChiCTR-IPR-15007572.Methods18 patients with obstructive jaundice and 12 non-jaundiced patient controls received dexmedetomidine, 1 μg/kg, over 10 min. Arterial blood samples were drawn before, during, and up to 5 h after the infusion. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were determined by 1290 infinity high performance liquid chromatography coupled with 6470 tandem mass spectrometry. The relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin 7.0.ResultsPlasma clearance of dexmedetomidine was decreased by 33.3% in the obstructive jaundice group as compared with the control group (0.0068±0.0017 vs. 0.0102±0.0033 L/kg/min; P = 0.002). Volume of distribution was decreased by 29.2% in the obstructive jaundice group as compared with the control group (1.43±0.58 vs. 2.02±0.84 L/kg; P = 0.041).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the clearance and distribution volume of dexmedetomidine were decreased in patients with obstructive jaundice. It may be advisable to adjust the dose of dexmedetomidine in those patients.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Cesarean Delivery and Its Concentration in Colostrum

(Int J Obstet Anesth 2017;32:28–32) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been reported to be useful for reducing postoperative pain after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The transfer of DEX into the colostrum in humans has not previously been investigated. This study aimed to measure postoperative DEX concentrations in blood and colostrum after elective cesarean delivery performed under spinal-epidural anesthesia in which a DEX infusion was administered during surgery.