Dexamethasone In Japanese Patients Research Articles

Model-based simulation to support the approval of isatuximab alone or with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japanese patients.

This study aimed to support dosing regimen selection for isatuximab as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A joint model characterizing the dynamics of serum M-protein kinetics and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) was developed using data from 201 evaluable Japanese and non-Japanese patients with RRMM enrolled in two monotherapy phase I/II trials, where Japanese patients (n= 31) received isatuximab at 10 or 20 mg/kg once weekly (qw) for 4 weeks then every 2 weeks (q2w) in subsequent cycles (10 or 20 mg/kg qw-q2w). Among non-Japanese patients, 38 received isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w in combination with dexamethasone. Trial simulations were then performed to evaluate the effect of the isatuximab dosing regimens on both serum M-protein and PFS with and without dexamethasone. The model identified instantaneous changes in serum M-protein as the best on-treatment predictor for PFS. Trial simulations demonstrated that 20 mg/kg qw-q2w induced a greater decrease (30% vs. 22%) of serum M-protein at week 8 and prolonged median PFS by 2.4 weeks compared with 10mg/kg qw-q2w. Although Japanese patients did not receive isatuximab plus dexamethasone in the phase I/II trial, simulations predicted that isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w plus dexamethasone would induce a greater decrease (67% vs. 43%) of serum M-protein and a prolonged median PFS by 7.2 weeks compared with isatuximab alone. Trial simulations support the approved isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w regimen when administered as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone in Japanese patients.

A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

BackgroundTOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. The current study was conducted to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients.MethodsThis phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma at 16 sites in Japan. Patients refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy at any line were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response or better in the response-evaluable analysis set. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival and safety.ResultsIn total, 34 patients were enrolled. The rate of very good partial response or better was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 31.9–68.1) and the overall response rate was 84.4% (95% confidence interval 67.2–94.7). Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval 17.3–not evaluable) and median overall survival was not estimable. The safety profile of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in this study was similar to that in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma are comparable with reported TOURMALINE-MM1 study results.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT02917941; date of registration September 28, 2016.

Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed-and-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Introduction: Panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in the PANORAMA-1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we present data from a phase II study (NCT02290431) of this combination in Japanese patients with relapsed or relapsed-and-refractory MM. Methods: Patients received 3-week cycles of 20-mg oral panobinostat (weeks 1 and 2), 1.3-mg/m² subcutaneous bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and 20-mg oral dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib administration) for a total of 8 cycles (24 weeks; treatment phase 1). Patients with treatment benefit had an option to enter the extension phase to receive 6-week (42-day) cycles of panobinostat (weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5) plus bortezomib (days 1, 8, 22, and 29) and dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib treatment) for 24 weeks. The primary objective was complete response (CR) + near CR (nCR) rate after treatment phase 1 as per the modified European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria. Results: Of the 31 patients, 4 (12.9%) completed the treatment and 27 (87.1%) discontinued; 17 (54.8%) entered the extension phase. In total, 24 patients (77.4%) entered the survival follow-up phase and followed until study closure when the last patient was treated for 1 year after treatment phase 1. The CR + nCR rate was 48.4% (90% CI: 33.6–63.2). The overall response rate (CR + nCR + partial response) was 80.6%. The median PFS, duration of response, time to response, and time to progression were 15.3, 22.7, 1.4, and 15.3 months, respectively. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with diarrhea (80.6%), decreased appetite (58.1%), and thrombocytopenia (54.8%) being the most frequent, regardless of relationship to the study treatment. Thrombocytopenia (48.4%), fatigue (25.8%), diarrhea (22.6%), neutrophil count decrease (22.6%), platelet count decrease (22.6%), and lymphocyte count decrease (22.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 AEs. Conclusion: The study met the primary objective with 48.4% CR + nCR rate. The AEs associated with the combination treatment were safely managed using the existing AE management guidelines, including dose interruption/modification and/or supportive medical intervention. This treatment regimen is an effective option with a favorable benefit/risk profile for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

We conducted a multicenter, open-label study to investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma The study was composed of the "monotherapy phase", a dose-escalation phase, to determine the tolerability to single agent lenalidomide and the "combination phase" to determine the safety and obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. The primary end points were the tolerability to 25 mg lenalidomide and safety. Nine and six patients were enrolled in the monotherapy phase and the combination phase, respectively. Since 25 mg of monotherapy treatment did not satisfy the DLT criteria, this dose was employed in the combination phase. The major adverse event was myelosuppression. At the planned interim analysis (median study duration, 26.3 weeks), grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia was observed with high frequency (66.7%). However, all adverse events observed were clinically manageable. In the combination cohort, the overall response rate (> or =PR) was 100%. The pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide showed rapid absorption and elimination after both single and multiple doses. In conclusion, 25 mg of lenalidomide was given safely as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone in Japanese patients. The good efficacy of the combination therapy was also demonstrated in this study.

Population pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of aprepitant and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with cancer, explore the factors that affect the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant, and evaluate the effect of aprepitant on the clearance of intravenous dexamethasone. A total of 897 aprepitant concentration measurements were obtained from 290 cancer patients and 25 healthy volunteers. For dexamethasone, a total of 847 measurements were obtained from 440 patients who were co-administered aprepitant (40, 125 mg, or placebo). Plasma concentration of aprepitant and dexamethasone were determined by liquid chromatography connected with a tandem mass spectrometer and analyzed by a population approach using NONMEM software. The plasma concentration time course of aprepitant was described using a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag time. Oral clearance (CL/F) of aprepitant was changed by aprepitant dose at doses of 40 or 125 mg. Body weight was the most influential intrinsic factor to CL/F of aprepitant. Age, ALT, and BUN also had mild effects on the CL/F. Typical population estimates of CL/F, apparent distribution volume (V(d)/F), absorption constant (K(a)) and absorption lag time were 1.54 L/h, 72.1 L, 0.893/h and 0.295 h, respectively. Inter-individual variability in CL/F, V(d)/F and K(a) were 53.9, 21.0, and 141%, respectively; intra-individual variability was 27.7%. The plasma concentration time course of intravenous dexamethasone was also described using a one-compartment model. Clearance of dexamethasone was decreased 24.7 and 47.5% by co-administration of aprepitant 40 and 125 mg. All final model estimates of aprepitant and dexamethasone fell within 10% of the bootstrapped mean. A pharmacokinetic model for aprepitant has been developed that incorporates body weight, age, ALT, BUN and aprepitant dose to predict the CL/F. The results of population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexamethasone support dose adjustment of dexamethasone in the case of co-administration with aprepitant.