Development Of Cannabinoid Tolerance Research Articles

The effect of cyclosporine on the development and expression of cannabinoid tolerance in mice

Cyclosporine, beside its immunosuppressive action, has several effects on different neuronal functions, such as modulation of neurotransmitter release, the inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis and release, the reduction of cAMP production and inhibition of morphine-induced tolerance. In the present study, the effect of cyclosporine on the expression and development of tolerance to WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, was studied. Intra peritoneal (i.p.) injection of WIN 55,212-2 (2–6 mg/kg) induced time-dependent and dose-dependent analgesia and catalepsy in mice. Administration of cyclosporine (20 mg/kg i.p.), 30 min before WIN 55,212-2 (6 mg/kg i.p.), did not change the analgesic and cataleptic effects of WIN 55,212-2. When WIN 55,212-2 (6 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once a day, animals became completely tolerant to the analgesic and cataleptic effects within five and nine days respectively. Cyclosporine (20 mg/kg i.p.) injected once daily, 30 min before WIN 55,212-2, attenuated the development of tolerance to the analgesic and cataleptic effects of WIN 55,212-2 but did not affect the expression of tolerance. Since cyclosporine given chronically by itself did not alter the analgesia and catalepsy induced by acute administration of WIN 55,212-2, our findings suggest cyclosporine may act with some selectivity on the mechanisms involved in development of cannabinoid tolerance.

Role of lipids and lipid signaling in the development of cannabinoid tolerance

Cannabinoid agonists such as Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produce a wide range of pharmacological effects both in the central nervous system and in the periphery. One of the most striking features of cannabinoids such as THC is the magnitude to tolerance that can be produced upon repetitive administration of this substance to animals. Relatively modest dosing regimens are capable of producing significant tolerance, whereas greater than 100-fold tolerance can be obtained with aggressive treatments. While cannabinoid tolerance has been studied quite extensively to establish its relevance to the health consequences of marijuana use, it has also proven to be a valuable strategy in understanding the mechanism of action of cannabinoids. The discovery of the endocannabinoid system that contains two receptor subtypes, CB 1 and CB 2, associated signaling pathways, endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol) and their synthetic and degradative pathways has provided a means of systematically evaluating the mechanism of cannabinoid tolerance. It is well known that the CB 1 cannabinoid receptor is down-regulated in states of cannabinoid tolerance along with uncoupling from its second messenger systems. Endocannabinoid levels are also altered in selected brain regions during the development of tolerance. While it is reasonable to speculate that a likely relationship exists between receptor and endocannabinoid levels, at present, little is known regarding the biological signal that leads to alterations in endocannabinoid levels. It is also unknown to what degree synthetic and degradative pathways for the endocannabinoids are altered in states of tolerance. The discovery that the brain is abundant in fatty acid amides and glycerols raises the question as to what roles these lipids contribute to the endocannabinoid system. Some of these lipids also utilize the endocannabinoid metabolic pathways, produce similar pharmacological effects, and are capable of modulating the actions of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol. In addition, there are dopamine, glycine, and serotonin conjugates of arachidonic acid that may also contribute to the actions of endocannabinoids. A systematic examination of these lipids in cannabinoid tolerance might shed light on their physiological relevance to the endocannabinoid system.

Signaling pathways involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance

Signaling pathways involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance

Participation of the opioid system in cannabinoid-induced antinociception and emotional-like responses

Several anatomical, biochemical and pharmacological evidence support the existence of bidirectional interactions between cannabinoid and opioid systems. The present review is focused on the participation of the endogenous opioid system in the antinociceptive and emotional-like responses induced by cannabinoids, and the development of tolerance to cannabinoid pharmacological effects. Cannabinoid and opioid agonists produce antinociception by acting on similar structures within the central nervous system, and a peripheral mechanism has been also proposed for both compounds. Pharmacological studies have suggested that the endogenous opioid system could be involved in cannabinoid antinociception and the development of cannabinoid tolerance. Recent studies using knockout mice have also demonstrated the role of the opioid system in cannabinoid antinociception and tolerance, although some discrepancies with the previous pharmacological results have been reported when using knockout mice. On the other hand, cannabinoid administration can induce anxiolytic-like responses that are mediated at least in part by an endogenous opioid activity on μ- and δ-opioid receptors.

Agonist-Induced Internalization and Trafficking of Cannabinoid CB1Receptors in Hippocampal Neurons

Agonist-induced internalization of G-protein-coupled receptors is an important mechanism for regulating receptor abundance and availability at the plasma membrane. In this study we have used immunolabeling techniques and confocal microscopy to investigate agonist-induced internalization and trafficking of CB(1) receptors in rat cultured hippocampal neurons. The levels of cell surface CB(1) receptor immunoreactivity associated with presynaptic GABAergic terminals decreased markedly (by up to 84%) after exposure to the cannabinoid agonist (+)-WIN55212, in a concentration-dependent (0.1-1 microm) and stereoselective manner. Inhibition was maximal at 16 hr and abolished in the presence of SR141716A, a selective CB(1) receptor antagonist. Methanandamide (an analog of an endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide) also reduced cell surface labeling (by 43% at 1 microm). Differential labeling of cell surface and intracellular pools of receptor demonstrated that the reduction in cell surface immunoreactivity reflects agonist-induced internalization and suggests that the internalized CB(1) receptors are translocated toward the soma. The internalization process did not require activated G-protein alpha(i) or alpha(o) subunits. A different pattern of cell surface CB(1) receptor expression was observed using an undifferentiated F-11 cell line, which had pronounced somatic labeling. In these cells substantial CB(1) receptor internalization was also observed after exposure to (+)-WIN55212 (1 microm) for relatively short periods (30 min) of agonist exposure. In summary, this dynamic modulation of CB(1) receptor expression may play an important role in the development of cannabinoid tolerance in the CNS. Agonist-induced internalization at presynaptic terminals has important implications for the modulatory effects of G-protein-coupled receptors on neurotransmitter release.

Changes in the cannabinoid receptor binding, G protein coupling, and cyclic AMP cascade in the CNS of rats tolerant to and dependent on the synthetic cannabinoid compound CP55,940.

Chronic exposure to CP55,940 produced a significant down-regulation of cannabinoid receptors in the striatum, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum of rat brain. At 24 h after SR141716-precipitated withdrawal, we observed a tendency to return to basal levels in the striatum and cortex, whereas the specific binding remained lower in the hippocampus and cerebellum. When we surveyed cannabinoid receptor-activated G proteins, in chronic CP55,940-treated rats the guanosine 5'-O:-(3-[(35)S]thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assay revealed a decrease of activated G proteins in the striatum, cortex, and hippocampus, whereas no significant changes were seen in the cerebellum. At 24 h after the SR141716-precipitated withdrawal, [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding increased compared with that of rats chronically exposed to CP55,940, attaining the control level except for cerebellum, where we observed a trend to overcome the control amounts. Concerning the cyclic AMP (cAMP) cascade, which represents the major intracellular signaling pathway activated by cannabinoid receptors, in the cerebral areas from rats chronically exposed to CP55,940 we found alteration in neither cAMP levels nor protein kinase A activity. In the brain regions taken from CP55, 940-withdrawn rats, we only observed a significant up-regulation in the cerebellum. Our findings suggest that receptor desensitization and down-regulation are strictly involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance, whereas alterations in the cAMP cascade in the cerebellum could be relevant in the mediation of the motor component of cannabinoid abstinence.

A role of nitric oxide in WIN 55,212-2 tolerance in mice.

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the development of cannabinoid tolerance was examined by using N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) as an inhibitor of NO synthase. R(+)-[2,3-Dihydro-5-methyl-3 [(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-napht halenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), a cannabinoid receptor agonist, or L-NAME plus WIN 55,212-2 was acutely or chronically injected i.p. to mice and analgesia, body temperature and immobility were measured. A single injection of WIN 55,212-2 induced time- and dose-dependent analgesia, hypothermia and catalepsy. L-NAME (50 mg/kg), which per se was ineffective, administered 20 min before WIN 55,212-2 did not modify the analgesic, hypothermic and cataleptic responses to the cannabinoid. When WIN 55,212-2 was administered once a day, the animals became completely tolerant to the analgesic, hypothermic and cataleptic effects within five, seven and nine days respectively. L-NAME injected once daily 20 min before WIN 55,212-2 inhibited the development of tolerance to the hypothermic and cataleptic actions but not to the analgesic action of WIN 55,212-2. Since L-NAME given chronically by itself did not modify the analgesia, hypothermia and catalepsy induced by acute administration of WIN 55,212-2, our findings suggest L-NAME acts with some selectivity on the mechanisms involved in cannabinoid tolerance.

Chronic treatment with a synthetic cannabinoid CP-55,940 alters G-protein expression in the rat central nervous system

Prolonged exposure of rats to the synthetic cannabinoid receptor ligand, CP-55,940 (0.4 mg/kg, i.p. for 11 days), induced tolerance to analgesia, to the reduction in spontaneous locomotor activity and the incidence of splayed hind limbs. One hour after the last injection on day 11, the rats were killed and in situ hybridization was used to investigate the effect of treatment on G-protein α-subunit expression throughout the brain. Chronic cannabinoid exposure markedly reduced G α s, G α i and G α o mRNA levels. The message for the α s-subunit was decreased in all the brain areas containing the basal autoradiographic signal; the decrease ranging from 25% in the thalamus to 45% in the mesencephalon. Also the basal G α i expression was reduced in tolerant rats showing the greatest decrease in the forebrain (63%) in the cerebellum (58%) and in the mesencephalon (38%). The reduction in G α o expression (25%) was more localized, being present only in the rostral portion of the brain (cortex, striatum and olfactory area). The alterations in α-subunits gene expression were not followed by any change in the amount of proteins. Our results indicate that, besides the receptor modification, alteration to the G-protein expression could be a molecular event associated with the development of cannabinoid tolerance.