October 01 2018 Comments by Naoyuki Yoshino, on RMB Bloc in East Asia: Too Early to Talk About It? Author and Article Information Online Issn: 1536-0083 Print Issn: 1535-3516 © 2018 by the Asian Economic Panel and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2018Massachusetts Institute of Technology Asian Economic Papers (2018) 17 (3): 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00630 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Comments by Naoyuki Yoshino, on RMB Bloc in East Asia: Too Early to Talk About It?. Asian Economic Papers 2018; 17 (3): 50–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00630 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsAsian Economic Papers Search Advanced Search Naoyuki Yoshino: There was a discussion on the possibility of a yen bloc in the early 1990s. Frankel and Wei suggested that the U.S. dollar had a dominant influence in the western hemisphere and the Deutsch mark similarly dominated in Europe. On the other hand, East Asian countries were more properly classified as a dollar bloc than a yen bloc. This paper provides empirical evidence on whether East Asia can be considered a RMB bloc. The paper focuses on measuring empirical evidence in exchange rate determination. Many papers use the Swiss franc as a numeraire currency. Here, however, the authors found that the New Zealand dollar leads to a more stable coefficient compared with the Swiss franc. Empirical results are based on two-step regressions to avoid multicollinearity with time-varying coefficients and suggest that the RMB gained influence in exchange rate determination in East Asia, especially since the 2008–09 Global Financial... You do not currently have access to this content.
Read full abstract