Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate Research Articles

Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) observation in the detection of colorectal lesions (deTXIon study).

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for detecting and resecting adenomas or early stage cancers to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer. In a recent observational study, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) was reported to improve polyp detection during colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial involving six Japanese institutions aims to confirm the superiority of TXI over standard white-light imaging (WLI) in detecting colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. During the 1-year study period, 960 patients will be enrolled, with 480 patients in the TXI and WLI groups. The primary endpoint is the mean number of adenomas detected per procedure. The secondary endpoints include adenoma detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, flat polyp detection rate, depressed lesion detection rate, mean polyps detected per procedure, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, mean SSLs detected per procedure and adverse events.

Effect of a novel artificial intelligence–based cecum recognition system on adenoma detection metrics in a screening colonoscopy setting

Cecal intubation in colonoscopy relies on self-reporting. We developed an artificial intelligence-based cecum recognition system (AI-CRS) for post-hoc verification of cecal intubation and explored its impact on adenoma metrics. Quality metrics, including cecal intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and other ADR-related metrics, were compared both before (2015-2018) and after (2019-2022) the implementation of the AI-CRS. Although the CIR did not change significantly after the implementation of the AI-CRS, the ADR and advanced ADR significantly increased. Although the ADR significantly increased in all segments, the most significant increase in advanced ADR was observed in the proximal colon. Implementation of the AI-CRS was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.45) and advanced adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.41), respectively. Implementation of a post-hoc verification of cecal intubation using an AI-CRS significantly improved various adenoma metrics in screening colonoscopy.

Effect of artificial intelligence implementation to the latest generation 4K colonoscopy.

<b>Indroduction:</b> Colonoscopy is an acclaimed screening test to detect colorectal cancer (CRC). The most important quality indicators for colonoscopy are adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), withdrawal time (WT), and bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; BBPS). In modern endoscopy practice, the human eye is enhanced by highdefinition white-light visualization and advanced imaging technology. The main limitation of this procedure is the detection rate of suspicious lesions. The next generation of endoscopes with 4K resolution and computer-aided detection (CADe) based on artificial intelligence (AI) may be the next step to improve the quality of tests performed.<b>Aim:</b> The aim was to assess the effect of CADe implementation in the environment of the latest generation of endoscopes and 4K visualization in retrospective analysis.<b>Methods:</b> The study included 2,000 patients over 18 years old who underwent colonoscopy for various indications. Olympus Endo-Aid CADe AI system was used, together with the latest X1 series endoscope set using LED lighting and 4K ultra high-resolution technology. Group I consisted of 1,000 consecutive tests performed using Endo-Aid CADe, and group II the first 1,000 consecutive tests without the CADe system. ADR, Advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and mean polyp per patient score (MPP) were assessed in each group<b>Results:</b> A total of 2,000 participants were included in the analysis, divided into two groups regarding CADe implementation. The overall PDR was similar in the analyzed groups (AI: 46.7% <i>vs.</i> non-AI: 44.9%, P = 0.419). Both ADR (29.7 <i>vs.</i> 28.9%, P = 0.694) and AADR (6.9 <i>vs.</i> 7.1%, P = 0.861) changed unremarkably. However, a significant elevation in MPP was noted. The MPP rose from 0.85 in the non-AI group to 1.26 in the AI group (P<0.001). The comparative analysis conducted separately for each segment of the bowel revealed that PDR remarkably increased in the left colon (29.3 <i>vs.</i> 18.0%, P<0.001), with no difference for other segments and other parameters. Investigating the MPP separately in each segment showed a significant difference for the right colon (0.33 <i>vs.</i> 0.23, P = 0.032) and the left colon (0.47 <i>vs.</i> 0.28, P<0.001). When adjusted to bowel preparation the PDR and MPP were constantly higher in the AI group (29.3 <i>vs.</i> 19.0%, P<0.001, and 0.48 <i>vs.</i> 0.30, P<0.001, respectively). In addition, the significant impact of AI implementation on MPP faded in the right colon (0.33 <i>vs.</i> 0.24, P = 0.051) when compared with the overall analysis.<b>Conclusions:</b> Although recently published evidence is optimistic regarding AI efficiency in improving the quality of colonoscopy, the provided results widen the overall perspective. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including procedures performed with newest generation scopes should elucidate the role of AI in high-resolution colonoscopy.

Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients. The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detection has garnered significant attention as a novel method for CRC screening. Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests, when combined, can improve screening accuracy and early detection rates, thereby facilitating early intervention and treatment. However, certain risks and costs accompany it, making the establishment of a risk classification model crucial for accurate classification and management of screened subjects. To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood test (FIT), and risk-graded screening strategies in CRC screening. Based on the randomized controlled trial of CRC screening in the population conducted by our hospital May 2020 to May 2023, participants who met the requirements were randomly assigned to a colonoscopy group, an FIT group, or a graded screening group at a ratio of 1:2:2 (after risk assessment, the high-risk group received colonoscopy, the low-risk group received an FIT test, and the FIT-positive group received colonoscopy). The three groups received CRC screening with different protocols, among which the colonoscopy group only received baseline screening, and the FIT group and the graded screening group received annual follow-up screening based on baseline screening. The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced tumors, including CRC and advanced adenoma. The population participation rate, advanced tumor detection rate, and colonoscopy load of the three screening programs were compared. A total of 19373 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, including 8082 males (41.7%) and 11291 females (58.3%). The mean age was 60.05 ± 6.5 years. Among them, 3883 patients were enrolled in the colonoscopy group, 7793 in the FIT group, and 7697 in the graded screening group. Two rounds of follow-up screening were completed in the FIT group and the graded screening group. The graded screening group (89.2%) and the colonoscopy group (42.3%) had the lowest overall screening participation rates, while the FIT group had the highest (99.3%). The results of the intentional analysis showed that the detection rate of advanced tumors in the colonoscopy group was greater than that of the FIT group [2.76% vs 2.17%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.65, P = 0.037]. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of advanced tumors between the colonoscopy group and the graded screening group (2.76% vs 2.35%, OR = 1.9, 95%CI: 0.93-1.51, P = 0.156), as well as between the graded screening group and the FIT group (2.35% vs 2.17%, OR = 1.09%, 95%CI: 0.88-1.34, P = 0.440). The number of colonoscopy examinations required for each patient with advanced tumors was used as an index to evaluate the colonoscopy load during population screening. The graded screening group had the highest colonoscopy load (15.4 times), followed by the colonoscopy group (10.2 times), and the FIT group had the lowest (7.8 times). A hierarchical screening strategy based on CRC risk assessment is feasible for screening for CRC in the population. It can be used as an effective supplement to traditional colonoscopy and FIT screening programs.

Long-term impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal adenoma detection in high-risk colonoscopy.

Improved adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been demonstrated with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. However, data on the real-world application of AI and its effect on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening outcomes is limited. To analyze the long-term impact of AI on a diverse at-risk patient population undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy for positive CRC screening tests or symptoms. AI software (GI Genius, Medtronic) was implemented into the standard procedure protocol in November 2022. Data was collected on patient demographics, procedure indication, polyp size, location, and pathology. CRC screening outcomes were evaluated before and at different intervals after AI introduction with one year of follow-up. We evaluated 1008 colonoscopies (278 pre-AI, 255 early post-AI, 285 established post-AI, and 190 late post-AI). The ADR was 38.1% pre-AI, 42.0% early post-AI (P = 0.77), 40.0% established post-AI (P = 0.44), and 39.5% late post-AI (P = 0.77). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (PDR, baseline 59.7%), advanced ADR (baseline 16.2%), and non-neoplastic PDR (baseline 30.0%) before and after AI introduction. In patients with an increased pre-test probability of having an abnormal colonoscopy, the current generation of AI did not yield enhanced CRC screening metrics over high-quality colonoscopy. Although the potential of AI in colonoscopy is undisputed, current AI technology may not universally elevate screening metrics across all situations and patient populations. Future studies that analyze different AI systems across various patient populations are needed to determine the most effective role of AI in optimizing CRC screening in clinical practice.

A128 OPTIMIZED COMPUTER ASSISTED TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING ADENOMA DETECTION DURING COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background Efforts to improve colonoscopy have recently focused on improving adenoma detection interventions such as artificial intelligence (CADe) that have demonstrated improvements in Adenoma Detection Rates (ADR). Although studies have focused on implementation of one intervention at a time. Aims We evaluated an optimized computer assisted technique (CADopt) versus standard colonoscopy to improve ADR during colonosocopy. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted enrolling adults (45–80 years) undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the intervention group (CADopt, and control group. In the CADopt group, endoscopists used a computer aided polyp detection combined with linked colour imaging, water exchange colonoscopy, and cecal retroflexion. In the control group, standard colonoscopy was performed. Primary outcome was Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes included advanced ADR (AADR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rates (SDR). Results A total of 467 patients were recruited and randomized (CADopt group 229 patients, 50.2% female vs 238 patients, 48.3% female in the control group). ADR was 49.3% (95%CI 42.7-56.0) for the CADopt group vs 38.2% (95%CI 32.0-44.7) for the control group (p=0.016). AADR and SDR were 13.1% (95%CI 9.0-18.2) and 6.6% (95%CI 3.7-10.6) for the CADopt group versus 8.0% (95%CI 4.9-12.2), and 7.1% (95%CI 4.2-11.1) for the control group, respectively. Conclusions Using an optimized computer assisted technique led to significant improvements in ADR and a trend towards AADR improvements. Funding Agencies Fujifilm

Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial.

Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions. This was a 3-arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or older. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (sessile detection rate [SDR]), and advanced adenoma (advanced adenoma detection rate) between the 2 groups. A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD groups was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively, while the corresponding PDR was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR, and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4%-8.2%, P = 0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%-5.8%, P = 0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4%-9.7%, P < 0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had a higher ADR, PDR, SDR, and advanced adenoma detection rate than the HD group (all P < 0.01). Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared with AI alone.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with increasing incidence and mortality in Latin America. CRC screening programs can reduce disease burden, but information on screening programs in Latin America is limited. To describe characteristics (eg, type of program, uptake, neoplastic yield) of CRC screening programs in Latin America. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, LILACS, and SciELO were searched from inception to February 2023. Relevant references from bibliographies, conference proceedings, and gray literature were considered. The search strategy included English, Spanish, and Portuguese terms. Included were studies of CRC screening programs in Latin America using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or colonoscopy as the primary screening method. Four reviewers independently assessed study eligibility based on titles, with review of abstracts and full texts as needed. Guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were followed for data abstraction and quality assessment. Descriptive information was extracted, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Program performance indicators included rates of participation and FIT positivity, adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), CRC detection rate, and colonoscopy quality indicators. There were 17 studies included from upper middle-income and high-income countries in Latin America with a total of 123 929 participants. Thirteen studies used FIT as the initial screening method, whereas 4 used screening colonoscopy. The participation rate in FIT-based programs was 85.8% (95% CI, 78.5%-91.4%). FIT positivity rates were 15.2% (95% CI, 9.6%-21.8%) for the 50-ng/mL threshold and 9.7% (95% CI, 6.8%-13.0%) for the 100-ng/mL threshold. For FIT-based studies, the pooled ADR was 39.0% (95% CI, 29.3%-49.2%) and CRC detection rate was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%-7.9%); for screening colonoscopy-based studies, the pooled ADR was 19.9% (95% CI, 15.5%-24.8%) and CRC detection rate was 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.8%). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that CRC screening in upper middle-income countries in Latin America is feasible, detecting rates of neoplasia comparable with those of high-income regions. Population-based screening programs should be developed or enhanced in these settings. There is a knowledge gap regarding feasibility and yield of screening programs in lower middle-income countries.

Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal neoplasia in individuals aged 40-49years: Findings from screening program in China.

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals under 50 is increasing worldwide. We conducted an analysis of colonoscopy findings in high-risk individuals under 50 in the CRC screening program in Tianjin, China, to determine the detection rate and risk factors of advanced adenomas (AA), advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN), colorectal neoplasia (CN). Our study investigated individuals aged 40-49 who underwent CRC screening and completed colonoscopy, 2012-2020, while the 50-54 age group served as a control. We compared the detection rates of AA, ACN, and CN among three age groups using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and investigated the risk factors associated with AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-49. We found a gradual increase in the detection rate of AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-54. The detection rates for AA (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.81), ACN (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.77), and CN (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.56-0.74) were lower in individuals aged 40-44 compared to 45-49. The detection rates of AA (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.87-1.34) and ACN (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.93-1.35) in individuals aged 45-49 were comparable with 50-54. Besides, lifestyle factors, BMI, and FIT are not associated with the detection rates of AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-49. Our study reveals screening data in individuals under 50, indicating comparable detection rates of AA and ACN in individuals aged 45-49 and 50-54. These findings provide valuable data support for optimizing the optimal age to initiate screening.

Effect of Real-Time Computer-Aided Polyp Detection System (ENDO-AID) on Adenoma Detection in Endoscopists-in-Training: A Randomized Trial

BackgroundThe effect of computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) on adenoma detection rate (ADR) among endoscopists-in-training remains unknown. MethodsWe performed a single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in Hong Kong between April 2021 and July 2022 (NCT04838951). Eligible subjects undergoing screening/surveillance/diagnostic colonoscopies were randomized 1:1 to receive colonoscopies with CADe (ENDO-AID(OIP-1), Olympus Co., Japan) or not (control) during withdrawal. Procedures were performed by endoscopists-in-training with <500 procedures and <3 years’ experience. Randomization was stratified by patient age, sex, and endoscopist experience (beginner vs intermediate-level, <200 vs 200-500 procedures). Image enhancement and distal attachment devices were disallowed. Subjects with incomplete colonoscopies or inadequate bowel preparation were excluded. Treatment allocation was blinded to outcome assessors. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were ADR for different adenoma sizes and locations, mean number of adenomas, and non-neoplastic resection rate. Results386 and 380 subjects were randomized to CADe and control groups, respectively. The overall ADR was significantly higher in CADe than control group (57.5% vs 44.5%, adjusted relative risk 1.41, 95%CI 1.17-1.72, p<0.001). The ADRs for <5mm (40.4% vs 25.0%) and 5-10mm adenomas (36.8% vs 29.2%) were higher in CADe group. The ADRs were higher in CADe group in both right (42.0% vs 30.8%) and left colon (34.5% vs 27.6%), but there was no significant difference in advanced ADR. The ADRs were higher in CADe group among beginners (60.0% vs 41.9%) and intermediate-level endoscopists (56.5% vs 45.5%). Mean number of adenomas (1.48 vs 0.86) and non-neoplastic resection rate were higher in CADe group (52.1% vs 35.0%). ConclusionsAmong endoscopists-in-training, the use of CADe during colonoscopies was associated with increased overall ADR. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04838951)

Flying endoscopists in the Arctic: initiatives for quality assurance of endoscopies in Greenland

BackgroundSurgical coastal expeditions (SCEs) have been organized in Greenland for many years. They aim to provide small coastal hospitals with specialist services, such as endoscopies (SCEEs), by deploying specialist personnel, surgeons, and the necessary equipment to the hospital temporarily. The purpose of this program is to increase accessibility for patients, while simultaneously reducing the costs associated with patient transport to the central hospital.MethodsThis retrospective pilot review of medical records identified quality indicators, such as bowel cleansing (BP), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates (ADR, AADR), to investigate the status and establish a system for quality monitoring of SCEsE in Greenland.ResultsDuring two SCEs (8 working days), 89 SCEE were performed at Qaqortoq and Sisimiut Hospitals. The 60 patients who underwent colonoscopy included 32 men and 28 women with a mean age of 61 years (range 24–80 years). The unadjusted CIR was 91.7%. In eight (13.3%) examinations, bowel preparation was rated as unsatisfactory, resulting in two incomplete procedures. The ADR and AADR were 35% and 11.7%, respectively, and one cancer was detected (1.7%).ConclusionThe results showed satisfactory ADR, AADR, and CIR levels. However, the review also highlighted the need for increased attention to BP by developing a new procedure that considers differences due to specific eating habits in Greenland and provides much better information for patients. The review provided a snapshot of the quality of colonoscopies in Greenland, highlighting the necessity to continue this process to ensure that the quality is up to standard. Furthermore, SCE helps reduce the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy by avoiding the need for patient air transport; instead of 77 round trips (61,830 km), only 8 (6440 km) were required.

S250 Comparing Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate Between Water Exchange and Computer-Aided Colonoscopy Using Pooled Data From Randomized Controlled Trials

S250 Comparing Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate Between Water Exchange and Computer-Aided Colonoscopy Using Pooled Data From Randomized Controlled Trials

Measuring the observer (Hawthorne) effect on adenoma detection rates.

Background and study aims An independent observer can improve procedural quality. We evaluated the impact of the observer (Hawthorne effect) on important quality metrics during colonoscopies. Patients and Methods In a single-center comparative study, consecutive patients undergoing routine screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. In the index group, all procedural steps and quality metrics were observed and documented, and the procedure was video recorded by an independent research assistant. In the reference group, colonoscopies were performed without independent observation. Colonoscopy quality metrics such as polyp, adenoma, serrated lesions, and advanced adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR, SLDR, AADR) were compared. The probabilities of increased quality metrics were evaluated through regression analyses weighted by the inversed probability of observation during the procedure. Results We included 327 index individuals and 360 referents in the final analyses. The index group had significantly higher PDRs (62.4% vs. 53.1%, P =0.02) and ADRs (39.4% vs. 28.3%, P =0.002) compared with the reference group. The SLDR and AADR were not significantly increased. After adjusting for potential confounders, the ADR and SLDR were 50% (relative risk [RR] 1.51; 95%, CI 1.05-2.17) and more than twofold (RR 2.17; 95%, CI 1.05-4.47) more likely to be higher in the index group than in the reference group. Conclusions The presence of an independent observer documenting colonoscopy quality metrics and video recording the colonoscopy resulted in a significant increase in ADR and other quality metrics. The Hawthorne effect should be considered an alternative strategy to advanced devices to improve colonoscopy quality in practice.

Revisiting bowel preparation: The quest for the optimal low‐residue diet duration

Revisiting bowel preparation: The quest for the optimal <scp>low‐residue</scp> diet duration

Methylated SDC2 testing in stool DNA for early screening of colorectal cancer in Shipai Town, Dongguan City

Objective: To explore the utility of stool-based DNA test of methylated SDC2 (mSDC2) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in residents of Shipai Town, Dongguan City. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Using a cluster sampling method, residents of 18 villages in Shipai Town, Dongguan City were screened for CRC from May 2021 to February 2022. In this study, mSDC2 testing was employed as a preliminary screening method. Colonoscopy examination was recommended for individuals identified as high-risk based on the positive mSDC2 tests. The final screening results, including the rate of positive mSDC2 tests, the rate of colonoscopy compliance, the rate of lesions detection, and the cost-effectiveness of screening, were analyzed to explore the benefits of this screening strategy. Results: A total of 10 708 residents were enrolled and completed mSDC2 testing, giving a participation rate of 54.99% (10 708/19 474) and a pass rate of 97.87% (10 708/10 941). These individuals included 4 713 men (44.01%) and 5 995 women (55.99%) with a mean age of (54.52±9.64) years. The participants were allocated to four age groups (40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-74 years), comprising 35.21%(3770/10 708), 36.25% (3882/10 708), 18.84% (2017/10 708), and 9.70% (1039/10 708) of all participants, respectively. mSDC2 testing was positive in 821/10 708 (7.67%) participants, 521 of whom underwent colonoscopy, resulting in a compliance rate of 63.46% (521/821). After eliminating of 8 individuals without pathology results, data from 513 individuals were finally analyzed. Colonoscopy detection rate differed significantly between age groups (χ2=23.155, P<0.001),ranging from a low of 60.74% in the 40-49 year age group to a high of 86.11% in the 70-74 year age group. Colonoscopies resulted in the diagnosis of 25 (4.87%) CRCs, 192 (37.43%) advanced adenomas, 67 (13.06%) early adenomas, 15 (2.92%) serrated polyps, and 86 (16.76%) non- adenomatous polyps. The 25 CRCs were Stage 0 in 14 (56.0%) individuals, stage I in 4 (16.0%), and Stage II in 7(28.0%). Thus, 18 of the detected CRCs were at an early stage. The early detection rate of CRCs and advanced adenomas was 96.77% (210/217). The rate of mSDC2 testing for all intestinal lesions was 75.05% (385/513). In particular, the financial benefit of this screening was 32.64 million yuan, and the benefit-cost ratio was 6.0. Conclusion: Screening for CRCs using stool-based mSDC2 testing combined with colonoscopy has a high lesion detection rate and a high cost-effectiveness ratio. This is a CRC screening strategy that deserves to be promoted in China.

A25 MEASURING THE OBSERVER (HAWTHORNE) EFFECT ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATES: A CASE-CONTROL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Abstract Background The effectiveness of colonoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) is directly linked to its procedural quality. An independent observer (Hawthorne effect) can improve colonoscopy procedural quality metrics, including adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the results of studies are limited or controversial. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the colonoscopy quality metrics in a group of patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopies under stringent observer conditions. Method In a single-center, case–control study, consecutive patients undergoing routine screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. In the case group, all procedural steps and quality metrics were observed and documented, and the procedure was video recorded by an independent research assistant. In the control group, colonoscopies were performed without independent observation. Colonoscopy quality metrics such as polyp, adenoma, serrated lesions, and advanced adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR, SLDR, AADR), the mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), and the mean number of adenomas and serrated lesions detected per patient (MASP) were compared. The probabilities of increased quality metrics were evaluated through regression analyses weighted by the inversed probability of observation during the procedure. Result(s) We included a total of 687 patients (327 cases and 360 controls) in the final analyses. The case group had significantly higher PDRs (62.4% vs. 53.1%) and ADRs (39.4% vs. 28.3%) compared with the control group. The SLDR was also higher in the case group than in the control group, but the difference was not significant (7.3% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.14). The AADR was not significantly increased. After adjusting for potential confounders, the ADR and SLDR were 50% (odds ratio [OR] 1.51; 95%CI 1.05–2.17) and more than twofold (OR 2.17; 95%CI 1.05–4.47) more likely to be higher in the case group than in the control group. The MAP and MASP were significantly increased in the case group compared with the control group (P &amp;lt; 0.001). The regression analyses for both metrics demonstrated the direct and significant association between the Hawthorne effect and elevated MAP/MASP. Conclusion(s) The presence of an independent observer documenting colonoscopy quality metrics and video recording the colonoscopy resulted in a significant increase in ADR and other quality metrics. The Hawthorne effect should be considered an alternative strategy to advanced devices to improve colonoscopy quality in routine practice. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest M. Taghiakbari: None Declared, D. Coman: None Declared, M. Takla: None Declared, A. N. Barkun: None Declared, M. Frija-Gruman: None Declared, M. Bouin: None Declared, S. Bouchard: None Declared, E. Deslandres: None Declared, S. Sidani: None Declared, D. von Renteln Grant / Research support from: ERBE, Ventage, Pendopharm, and Pentax, Consultant of: Boston Scientific and Pendopharm

Detection rates of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancers among the opportunistic colonoscopy screening population: a single-center, retrospective study.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine and compare the detection rate of adenomas, advanced adenomas (AAs) and CRCs, and the number needed to screen (NNS) of individuals in an average-risk Chinese population of different ages and genders. This was a retrospective study performed at the Institute of Health Management, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. Colonoscopy results were analyzed for 53,152 individuals finally enrolled from January 2013 to December 2019. The detection rate of adenomas, AAs, or CRCs was computed and the characteristics between men and women were compared using chi-squared test. The average age was 48.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.5 years) for men and 50.0 years (SD, 9.0 years) for women, and the gender rate was 66.27% (35,226) vs. 33.73% (17,926). The detection rates of adenomas, AAs, serrated adenomas, and CRCs were 14.58% (7750), 3.09% (1641), 1.23% (653), and 0.59% (313), respectively. Men were statistically significantly associated with higher detection rates than women in adenomas (17.20% [6058/35,226], 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.74-17.53% vs. 9.44% [1692/17,926], 95% CI 8.94-9.79%, P < 0.001), AAs (3.72% [1309], 95% CI 3.47-3.87% vs. 1.85% [332], 95% CI 1.61-2.00%, P < 0.001), and serrated adenomas (1.56% [548], 95% CI 1.43-1.69% vs. 0.59% [105], 95% CI 0.47-0.70%, P < 0.001). The detection rate of AAs in individuals aged 45 to 49 years was 3.17% (270/8510, 95% CI 2.80-3.55%) in men and 1.69% (69/4091, 95% CI 1.12-1.86%) in women, and their NNS was 31.55 (95% CI 28.17-35.71) in men and 67.11 (95% CI 53.76-89.29) in women. The NNS for AAs in men aged 45 to 49 years was close to that in women aged 65 to 69 years (29.07 [95% CI 21.05-46.73]). The detection rates of adenomas, AAs, and serrated adenomas are high in the asymptomatic population undergoing a physical examination and are associated with gender and age. Our findings will provide important references for effective population-based CRC screening strategies in the future.

Adenoma Detection Rate in Average-Risk Population: An Observational Consecutive Retrospective Study.

Although colonoscopy is considered the most effective tool for reducing colorectal cancer-related morbidity, the age at which average-risk individuals begin colonoscopic screening is undetermined. This study aimed to compare the adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates according to age and sex in a large average-risk population in the rural areas of Eastern China. This observational, single-center, retrospective study included patients with average colorectal cancer risk and examined the adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates using age intervals of 5years. We also compared the size and age of patients with and without advanced adenoma. We included 18928 patients with a median age of 54 years (range 15-90years), including 10143 men and 8785 women. The adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates were 17.08% and 5.24%, respectively, and increased with age in the whole population. The adenoma detection rates increased from 8.97% (aged 40-44) to 14.98% (aged 45-49) and 6.24% (aged 45-49) to 11.00% (aged 50-54) in men and women (both P < .001), respectively. The advanced adenoma detection rates increased from 2.19% (aged 40-44) to 4.76% (aged 45-49) and 1.89% (aged 45-49) to 3.13% (aged 50-54) in men (P = .002) and women (P = .056), respectively. Patients with advanced adenomas were significantly older than those with non-advanced adenomas (P < .001). The tumors in the advanced adenoma group were significantly larger than those in the non-advanced adenoma group (P < .001). The adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates increased significantly in average-risk population aged 45years and older, especially in men.

Effect of add-on devices with projections on screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Add-on devices with projections, e.g., Endocuff, Endocuff Vision, EndoRings, and Wingcap, placed on the distal tip of the colonoscope promise to improve the detection of precancerous lesions. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of these devices exclusively among individuals undergoing colonoscopy for screening purpose. A computerized literature search was performed across MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials that compared standard colonoscopy (SC) to procedures using add-on devices. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), while secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), advanced ADR (AADR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR). The effect size on study outcomes was calculated using a random-effects model and presented as the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Seven studies enrolling a total of 5785 patients were included. The use of add-on-devices with projections was associated with a higher ADR compared to SC: 45.9% vs. 41.1%; RR 1.18, 95%CI 1.02-1.37; P=0.03; I2=79%. Although PDR was higher in screening colonoscopies assisted by add-on devices as compared to SC, the difference failed to reach significance: 55.1% vs. 50.8%; RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.96-1.26; P=0.17; I2=75%. No difference was found between procedures assisted by add-on devices with projections and SC colonoscopies in terms of AADR (18.5% vs. 17.6%; RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.79-1.27; P=0.98; I2=56%) or SSLDR (6.8% vs. 5.8%; RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.95-1.44; P=0.15; I2=0%). Colonoscopy assisted by add-on devices with projections achieves a better ADR compared to SC among individuals undergoing screening for bowel cancer.

Focusing on the study of colorectal tumor and improving the detection rate of advanced adenoma

The incidence of colorectal cancer in China is increasing year by year, and the mortality rate remains high. To reduce cancer-related social and economic burdens, awareness of and research on colorectal cancer is of great significance. It is necessary to explore the research on colorectal cancer diagnosis, endoscopic treatment, and prevention. Focuses should also be placed on actively screening for colorectal cancer and improving the advanced adenomas detection rate, thereby building a colorectal cancer prevention and treatment system which meets the national conditions of China.