Dysplasia Detection Rate Research Articles

Experience in the application of the Graf technique in Beijing

Aim: The aim was to review several aspects of work using ultrasound in diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip and analyze the application status of the Graf technique in Beijing over 15 years. Methods: First, data on the promotion and development of the Graf technique in Beijing over the past 15 years were retrospectively analyzed. Second, data on hip ultrasound (US) screening and the effect of consecutive brace therapy were collected and analyzed. Infants were divided into subgroups according to Graf type, age at initiation of treatment, sex, and affected side. Results: The ultrasound detection rate of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) was high at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. The total detection rate of type IIa, IIb, IIc, D, III and IV (abbreviated as: types IIa and worse) was 4.58%, and that of type IIb, IIc, D, III and IV (abbreviated as: types IIb and worse) was 1.40%. Clinicians should pay attention to DDH, and early treatment is important; therefore, it is recommended that infants and young children undergo DDH ultrasound screening as soon as possible. Our research shows that when the α angle was more than 43°, the efficacy of brace therapy was 95.95%. Conclusions: It was confirmed that the Graf technique has greater practicality and accuracy. The Graf technique, as an important means for the early screening of DDH, has been widely recognized around the world, and it is recommended to be widely used in China to preserve future health in as many children as possible.

Retrospective study of patellar fractures and damage of accessory soft tissue based on MRI.

To better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of patellar fractures, MRI was utilized to identify the imaging signs of various types of patellar fractures. A retrospective study was performed using MRI images of 52 patients with patellar fractures. Observing the development of patellar and femoral morphology and the imaging manifestations of different fracture types, such as fracture displacement, and damage to accessory ligaments, tendons, and meniscus, type of joint cavity effusion, and damage to surrounding accessory bones were identified. There were 21 tangential fractures (40.4%), 8 transverse fractures (15.4%), 8 longitudinal fractures (15.4%), 4 oblique fractures (7.7%), and 11 comminuted fractures (21.2%) among the 52 patients with patellar fracture. Tangential fractures begin at a younger age than the other four forms of fractures. When tangential fractures were compared to other types of fractures, medial patellar retinaculum and anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries were statistically significant (P< 0.05). The detection rate of trochlear dysplasia, type II and type III patellar was higher in patients with tangential fractures than in other fractures. Tangential fractures are less common to cause anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries than other types of fractures, but they are more likely to cause medial patellar retinaculum injuries.

High-definition chromoendoscopy results in more significant dysplasia detection than white light endoscopy with random biopsies in ulcerative colitis patients: A single-center retrospective study.

The goal of this study was to determine whether high-definition white light endoscopy with random biopsies (HD-WLR) or chromoendoscopy (HDCE) yielded a higher dysplasia detection rate in ulcerative colitis patients. Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients have a 2.4-fold increased future risk of developing colorectal cancer compared to the general population and require careful dysplasia screening modalities. Both HD-WLR and HDCE are regularly used, and recent guidelines do not suggest a preference. UC patients who underwent dysplasia surveillance at our site between January 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We calculated the dysplasia detection rate of both techniques at the first CRC screening colonoscopy. Eighteen dysplastic lesions were detected in total, 3 by HD-WLR and fifteen by HDCE. Dysplasia was detected in 4% (3/75) and 20% (15/75) of UC patients by HD-WLR and HDCE respectively, with significantly fewer biopsies (4.44 ± 4.3 vs 29.1 ± 13.0) required using the former. HD-WLR detected 2 polypoid and one non-polypoid lesion, while HDCE detected eleven polypoid and 4 non-polypoid lesions. No invisible dysplasia or colorectal cancer was detected. Screening was performed at 10.8 ± 4.8 and 9.72 ± 3.05 years following UC diagnosis for HDCE and HD-WLR respectively. Median withdrawal time was 9.0 ± 2.7 minutes (HD-WLR) vs 9.6 + 3.9 minutes (HDCE). HDCE is associated with higher dysplasia detection rates compared to HD-WLR in a UC patient population. Given the former technique is less tedious and costly, our findings complement existing studies that suggest HDCE may be considered over HD-WLR for UC dysplasia surveillance.

DOP28 Yield of surveillance colonoscopy in patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Abstract Background Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), in particular in patients with concurrent diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, strict surveillance colonoscopy in patients with PSC and PSC-IBD is recommended with consideration of random biopsies. The aim of this study was to assess the method and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in patients with PSC and PSC-IBD in routine practice in the Netherlands. Methods An observational cohort study was performed within the EpiPSC2 cohort in The Netherlands. Patients with a confirmed PSC diagnosis were included from January 2008 onwards. Data were collected retrospectively from the date of diagnosis until inclusion, and prospectively from that date forward. Patient demographics, PSC and IBD disease characteristics were collected at study inclusion and during annual follow-up. For this study, data collection was expanded retrospectively with colonoscopy and pathology reports. Outcomes were endoscopic surveillance technique, whether random or targeted biopsies were taken, if polypectomy was performed, dysplasia detection rate and type of dysplasia. Results The study population included 1,203 PSC patients, of whom 82.1% had large duct PSC, and 70.6% concomitant IBD (table 1). A total of 4,099 colonoscopies were performed in 759 individual patients, with a median of 4 colonoscopies per patient (IQR 2 – 8). The median follow-up duration was 11 years (IQR 12 – 17). In total, 11.5% (n=473) of colonoscopies were performed with chromo-endoscopy. Among the conducted colonoscopies, 2,543 included biopsies, 355 involved polypectomies, and 86 comprised both biopsies and polypectomies. Dysplasia was identified in 11.4% (341 out of 2,984) of the colonoscopies, including 14.1% indefinite for dysplasia (n=48), 75.1% low grade dysplasia (n=256), 7.6% high grade dysplasia (n=26), and 5.9% adenocarcinoma (n=20). The detection of dysplasia occurred through random biopsies in 89 colonoscopies (26.1%), targeted biopsies in 114 colonoscopies (33.4%) and polypectomy in 153 colonoscopies (44.9%) (figure 1). Dysplasia was observed in 195 (26%) individual patients, of whom 80.5% had PSC-IBD. Conclusion Our data highlights the importance of colonoscopic surveillance in PSC and PSC-IBD patients. Dysplasia was detected in over a quarter of patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. Notably, 26.1% of dysplasia cases were identified through random biopsies, emphasizing the importance of incorporating random biopsies into surveillance protocols for this specific patient population.

P926 Improved standards of colonoscopy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease through implementation of key performance measures - A quality improvement initiative

Abstract Background Improving the quality of colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease is expected to improve clinical outcomes for patients. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently published key performance measures for IBD colonoscopy assessment. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementing key performance measures and assess for sustainable improvement through a multimodal education intervention. Methods A baseline retrospective analysis was performed in patients with established IBD between June and August of 2022 at a tertiary hospital. The key performance measures included 1) pre-procedure metrics including indication, consent, and safety checklist (target of 100%) and 2) bowel preparation score, photo-documentation, disease activity scores, adequate biopsies, use of high-definition endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. There were six proceduralists involved and data was collected from electronic medical records including endoscopy and histopathology results. The ESGE performance measures were used to set minimum standards and we have adopted overall standards for our unit based on the ECCO and SCENIC consensus guidelines. Over 12 months, proceduralists and endoscopy nursing staff were engaged with educational interventions including didactic teaching for one hour and diagrammatic reminders in the endoscopy suites of the ESGE key performance measures. A post-implementation analysis was conducted at 1 year from baseline, from August to November of 2023. Results Baseline standards showed suboptimal performance in the use of disease activity scores and chromoendoscopy. Educational interventions were implemented and after 12 months, a repeat analysis of 50 consecutive patients showed significant improvement in all performance measures (see Table 1). Conclusion Quality metrics are important and underrecognised components in colonoscopy for IBD patients and form an integral part of improving patient care. Our study demonstrated that the implementation of the ESGE key performance measures is effective in improving the quality of colonoscopy assessment in IBD patients, identifying areas requiring further development and increasing the dysplasia detection rate. Acknowledging quality attrition over time, we recognise that regular teaching and education are required in addressing the challenge of sustainable long-term improvement.

Review on Advances in Pediatric Endoscopy in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Over the past decades, an increased importance has been given to gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in the management of children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), considering that mucosal healing has been recognized as the optimal endpoint in the treat-to-target paradigm. The recent advances in technology and anesthesia have facilitated the comprehensive evaluation of the GI tract. In this review, we will discuss the role of ileocolonoscopy, upper GI endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy in the work-up and management of pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, with particular attention on non-invasive endoscopic techniques, such as wireless capsule endoscopy. We will also analyze the most commonly used endoscopic scoring systems, including small bowel scoring systems and endoscopic recurrence grading of neo-terminal ileum CD. Moreover, we will focus on the endoscopic management of complications, such as strictures, that commonly require surgery. Lastly, we will discuss cancer surveillance in children with IBD, with particular consideration of the role of high-definition endoscopic equipment and chromoendoscopy in dysplasia detection rates.

WATS 3D : An Interobserver Study of Barrett's Esophagus-Associated Dysplasia Among Gastrointestinal Pathologists.

Wide-area transepithelial sampling with 3-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS 3D ) has been shown to increase the detection rate of dysplasia (and intestinal metaplasia) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability and accuracy of diagnosing BE-associated dysplasia in WATS 3D specimens among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists without prior experience with this technology. Five GI pathologists underwent a 4-hour in-person (at microscope) and virtual training session and then evaluated digital images of discrete cellular foci from 60 WATS 3D cases with BE (20 nondysplastic BE [NDBE], 20 low-grade dysplasia [LGD], and 20 high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma [HGD/EAC]). Each case consisted of 1 hematoxylin and eosin-stained image (cell block), and 1 liquid cytology or papanicolaou-stained smear image (120 images in total). The overall kappa value among the 5 study pathologists was excellent (overall kappa = 0.93; kappa = 0.93 and 0.97 for cell block and smear specimens, respectively). There were no significant differences noted in kappa values in interpretation of the cell block vs smear specimens or in any of the individual diagnostic categories when the latter were evaluated separately. Furthermore, agreement was perfect (100%) regarding detection of neoplasia (either LGD, HGD, or EAC). Diagnoses were made with complete confidence in 91% of instances. We conclude that GI pathologists, without any prior experience in interpretation of WATS 3D specimens, can undergo a short training session and then diagnose these specimens with a very high level of accuracy and reproducibility.

Adherence to endoscopic surveillance guidelines for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: An Australian cohort study.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer as compared with the general population. Endoscopic surveillance to detect early dysplastic changes is advised by several published clinical guidelines, which provide recommendations as to the timing and performance of surveillance procedures. There is a paucity of data as to adherence with these guidelines in clinical practice. A longitudinal inception cohort study of all new patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease across a service network of Australian hospitals between January 2005 and June 2014, with continuous follow-up in a gastroenterology clinic until December 31, 2022. Patients were included if they warranted surveillance according to the Australian guidelines. Adherence to guidelines and technical and quality measures were reported. A total of 136 patients were included, and a total of 263 surveillance procedures were performed. Ninety-five patients (70%) had their first surveillance colonoscopy within the correct time interval. Fifty patients (37%) were completely adherent to guidelines with respect to timing of all surveillance procedure. The overall dysplasia detection rate for surveillance procedures was 10%. Chromoendoscopy was only performed in 16% of procedures. Adherence to endoscopic surveillance guidelines with regard to timing of procedures and the utilization of chromoendoscopy is poor. Further clinician education, promotion of the surveillance guidelines and incorporation of chromoendoscopy training as part of the national colonoscopy training program may improve adherence to guidelines.

Cost-Consequence Analysis of Colon Cancer Screening among Patients with Long-Standing Ulcerative Colitis: 11 Years’ Experience of Saudi Population

BackgroundClinical guidelines recommend that patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) should undergo periodic surveillance colonoscopy. However, the cost and clinical value of performing annual colonoscopy among high-risk patient populations is largely unknown in the Middle East. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the cost and consequence of annual colonoscopy among high-risk UC patients in Saudi Arabia. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on UC patients who had UC for ≥ 8 years or had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) at any time during their disease,and underwent colonoscopy surveillance between 2010 and 2021 at a university-affiliated tertiary care center. Patients who underwent annual screening were considered adherent, and those who did not were considered non-adherent. The dysplasia detection rate (%) and the costs were expressed in United States Dollars (USD). To generate the 95 % confidence intervals for annual cost and clinical consequence, nonparametric bias-corrected accelerated bootstrapping with 10,000 simulations were conducted. ResultsTwo-hundred and sixty-one UC patients met the inclusion criteria and were included. Most of the patients 54 % (141 patients), were non-adherent to annual screening, and the patients’ mean age and duration of illness were 45 years and 15 years, respectively. The mean annual direct medical costs were USD 10,210.6 for patients who adhered to the annual screening program and USD 6,191.77 for those who did not adhere. The mean rates of dysplasia detection were 1.66 % and 7.09 % for patients who adhered and patients who did not adhere to annual colonoscopy, respectively. The difference in costs and rates of dysplasia detections between those who adhered to the annual screening and those who did not were USD 4,018.88 (95 % CI: 3097.46 – 6,798.06) and −5.43 % (95 % CI: −10.019 – −1.58730), respectively, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 740.125 per 1 % reduction in the rates of dysplasia. According to the bootstrap cost effectiveness distributions, adherence to the annual screening for UC patients would result in higher cost and lower rates of dysplasia development with more than 99 % confidence level. ConclusionAdherence to annual colonoscopy screening detects more dysplasia in UC patients but with an increased cost. Considering the low rate of progression to colorectal cancer among UC patients, the annual screening might not be cost effective.

Dysplasia detection rates under a surveillance program in a tertiary referral center for inflammatory bowel diseases: Real-world data

Background and aimsSurveillance colonoscopies are crucial for high-risk patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) to detect colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However, there is no established quality metric for dysplasia detection rate (DDR) in IBD surveillance. This study assessed the DDR in a dedicated surveillance program at a tertiary referral center for IBD. MethodsConsecutive patients with quiescent colitis were enrolled in a cross-sectional study evaluating DDR. High-definition colonoscopy with dye chromoendoscopy (DCE) was performed by a specialized operator. Advanced dysplasia (AD) was defined as low-grade dysplasia ≥ 10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, or colorectal cancer. Risk factors for dysplasia detection were analyzed. ResultsIn total, 119 patients underwent 151 procedures, identifying 206 lesions, of which 40 dysplastic with seven AD . Per-lesion and per-procedure DDR were 19.4 % and 20.5 %, respectively. The per-procedure AD detection rate (ADDR) was 4.6 %. A Kudo pit pattern of II-V had a sensitivity of 92.5 % for dysplasia detection but a false positive rate of 64.8 % (p < 0.001). Age at diagnosis and at index colonoscopy and past or indefinite dysplasia were associated with per-procedure dysplasia detection. ConclusionsIn a real-world setting, a dedicated surveillance program achieved a high DDR. We suggest that optimal DDR in high-risk IBD patients be defined and implemented as a standardized quality measure for surveillance programs.

Adherence to guideline recommendations for Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance endoscopies: Effects of dedicated BE endoscopy lists.

Background and study aims For non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus (BE) patients, guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance every 3 to 5 years with four-quadrant random biopsies every 2 cm of BE length. Adherence to these guidelines is low in clinical practice. Pooling BE surveillance endoscopies on dedicated endoscopy lists performed by dedicated endoscopists could possibly enhance guideline adherence, detection of visible lesions, and dysplasia detection rates (DDRs). Patients and methods Data were used from the ACID-study (Netherlands Trial Registry NL8214), a prospective trial of BE surveillance in the Netherlands. BE patients with known or previously treated dysplasia were excluded. Guideline adherence, detection of visible lesions, and DDRs were compared for patients on dedicated and general endoscopy lists. Results A total of 1,244 patients were included, 318 on dedicated lists and 926 on general lists. Endoscopies on dedicated lists showed significantly higher adherence to the random biopsy protocol (85% vs. 66%, P <0.01) and recommended surveillance intervals (60% vs. 47%, P <0.01) compared to general lists. Detection of visible lesions (8.8% vs. 8.1%, P =0.79) and DDRs were not significantly different (6.9% and 6.6%, P =0.94). None (0.0%) of the patients scheduled on dedicated lists and 10 (1.1%) on general lists were diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma ( P =0.07). In multivariable analysis, dedicated lists were significantly associated with biopsy protocol adherence and adherence to surveillance interval recommendations with odds ratios of 4.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-9.57) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.03-2.61), respectively. Conclusions Dedicated endoscopy lists are associated with better adherence to the random biopsy protocol and surveillance interval recommendations.

Dedicated service for Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance endoscopy yields higher dysplasia detection and guideline adherence in a non-tertiary setting in the UK: a 5-year comparative cohort study

ObjectiveBarrett’s oesophagus (BO) endoscopic surveillance is performed to varying quality, dedicated services may offer improved outcomes. This study compares a dedicated BO service to standard care, specifically dysplasia detection rate...

Author commentary on Mathew Vithayathil et al.

Mathew Vithayathil et al. The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus

What Is the Risk? Epidemiology and Evidence for Surveillance Regimens.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The risk for CRC is positively correlated to the duration of disease, extent of colonic involvement, and severity of inflammation. After 8 to 10 years of IBD diagnosis, the risk for CRC rises substantially and screening colonoscopy is recommended. Surveillance colonoscopy interval ranges from 1 to 5 years depending on patient and disease-specific risk factors. IBD patients with high risk factors such as having concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis, moderate-to-severe inflammation, first-degree relative with CRC at early age, or history of invisible dysplasia or high-risk visible dysplasia should undergo surveillance colonoscopy in 1 year. Meanwhile, those with minimal colonic involvement or ≥2 consecutive unremarkable examinations while in continuous remission may consider extending the surveillance interval to 5 years. Advance in colonoscopy technique such as chromoendoscopy using dyes and/or image digital processing (virtual chromoendoscopy) may enhance dysplasia detection and is the preferred method for IBD surveillance. In the era of high-definition colonoscope, the practice of obtaining extensive biopsies throughout the colon remains controversial but is generally recommended to improve the detection rate of invisible dysplasia. Endoscopic surveillance in IBD has been shown to result in earlier detection of CRC and improved prognosis.

A200 HIGH-DEFINITION CHROMOENDOSCOPY RESULTS IN MORE SIGNIFICANT DYSPLASIA DETECTION THAN WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY WITH RANDOM BIOPSIES IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease that results in inflammation of the colonic mucosa, leading to abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, weight loss, and diarrhea. This chronic inflammation results in a 2.4-fold increased future risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) in UC patients compared to the general population. Thus, careful dysplasia screening modalities are required to prevent progression to CRC. Currently, both high-definition white light endoscopy with non-targeted biopsies (HD-WLR) and dye-spray chromoendoscopy (HDCE) are regularly used across Canada for dysplasia surveillance given existing research has been inconclusive regarding superiority of one particular method, and that recent guidelines do not suggest a preference. Purpose The primary objective of this study was to determine which surveillance modality yielded a higher dysplasia detection rate in UC patients, both by calculating the total number of dysplastic lesions detected, as well as calculating the number of patients with at least one dysplastic lesion detected using either technique. Method We conducted a single-centre retrospective chart review of 150 UC patients who underwent dysplasia surveillance at our site between January 2019-2021. We calculated the dysplasia detection rate of both techniques at the time of the first CRC screening colonoscopy. Result(s) Eighteen dysplastic lesions were detected in total, three by HD-WLR and fifteen by HDCE. Dysplasia was detected in 4% (3/75) and 14.5% (15/75) of UC patients by HD-WLR and HDCE respectively, with significantly fewer biopsies (4.44 + 4.3 vs 29.1 + 13.0) required. HD-WLR detected two polypoid and one non-polypoid lesion, while HDCE detected eleven polypoid and four non-polypoid lesions. No invisible dysplasia or colorectal cancer was detected. Screening was performed at 10.8 + 4.8 and 9.72 + 3.05 years following UC diagnosis for HDCE and HD-WLR respectively. Median withdrawal time was 9.0 + 2.7 min (HD-WLR) vs 9.6 + 3.9min (HDCE). Image Conclusion(s) HDCE resulted in higher dysplasia detection rates compared to HD-WLR in a UC patient population. Given the former technique is less tedious and costly, our findings suggest HDCE should be considered over HD-WLR for UC dysplasia surveillance. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Effect of biopsy protocol adherence vs non-adherence on dysplasia detection rates in Barrett's esophagus surveillance endoscopies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance endoscopies are advised for early diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Current guidelines recommend obtaining four-quadrant random biopsies every 2 centimeters of BE length alongside with targeted biopsies if visible lesions are present. Low adherence rates for this random biopsy protocol are widely reported. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of adherence versus non-adherence to the four-quadrant biopsy protocol on detection of dysplasia in BE patients. Methods We searched for studies that reported effects of adherence and non-adherence to the four-quadrant biopsy protocol on dysplasia detection rates in BE patients. Adherence was defined as taking a minimum of 4 quadrant random biopsies per 2 cm of BE segment. Studies with low risk of bias and without applicability concerns were included in a good quality synthesis. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of dysplasia detection rates were calculated. Results A total of 1,570 studies were screened and 8 studies were included. Four studies were included in the good quality synthesis. In the pooled good quality analysis, four-quadrant biopsy protocol adherence significantly increased detection of dysplasia compared to non-adherence (RR 1.90, 95 % CI = 1.36-2.64; I2 = 45 %). Pooled RRs for LGD and HGD/EAC were 2.00 (95 % CI = 1.49-2.69; I2 = 0 %) and 2.03 (95 % CI = 0.98-4.24; I2 = 28 %), respectively. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that four-quadrant biopsy protocol adherence is associated with increased detection of dysplasia in BE patients. Efforts should be made to increase biopsy protocol adherence rates.

Analysis of the results of hip ultrasonography in 48 666 infants and efficacy studies of conservative treatment.

This study aimed to investigate the detection rate of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by ultrasound. To obtain the distribution characteristics of the different types (I-IV) and the role of ultrasound in the evaluation of infants with DDH (type IIc and above) receiving conservative treatment. A retrospective analysis was performed. The chi-square test was used for comparisons between count-data groups. Two-sided tests were used for all analyses. The results of ultrasound follow-up after conservative treatment are described. Among the 48 666 infants examined, the detection rates were as follows: type I, 95.42%; IIa, 3.18%; IIb, 0.91%; IIc, 0.22%; D, 0.01%; III, 0.14%; and IV, 0.12%. There were 4456 hips with IIa and above, more left (54.65%) than right (45.35%) hips, and more females (82.60%) than males (17.40%). The detection rate of type IIa and above was 4.58%, and that of type IIb and above was 1.40%. After the treatment, the α value increased, and β value decreased. The cure rate of the less-than-42-days group was higher than that of the other groups. The ultrasound detection rate of DDH is high. DDH was more likely to occur on the left side and in females. It is recommended that the infants should be treated within 42 days.

Incremental Detection Rate of Dysplasia and Sessile Serrated Polyps/Adenomas Using Narrow-Band Imaging and Dye Spray Chromoendoscopy in Addition to High-Definition Endoscopy in Patients with Long-Standing Extensive Ulcerative Colitis: Segmental Tandem Endoscopic Study.

High-definition (HD) endoscopy is recommended in surveillance colonoscopy for detecting dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Dye-spray chromoendoscopy (DCE) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) are often used as adjunctive techniques of white-light endoscopy (WLE) in real-world practice. However, the incremental detection ability of DCE and NBI added to HD-WLE for dysplasia and serrated lesions has not yet been evaluated using tandem endoscopy in patients with long-standing extensive UC. We enrolled patients with extensive UC for >8 years who were in clinical remission (partial Mayo score < 2) at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. HD-WLE was performed first. Subsequently, HD-NBI and HD-DCE with indigo carmine were performed using the segmental tandem colonoscopy technique. A total of 40 patients were eligible, and data obtained from 33 patients were analyzed. The incremental detection rates (IDRs) for dysplasia and serrated lesions were calculated. HD-WLE detected three dysplasia and five sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSAs/Ps). HD-NBI and HD-DCE did not detect additional dysplasia (IDR = 0%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0-56.2%). HD-NBI identified one missed SSA/P (IDR = 7.7%; 95% CI: 1.4-33.3%), and HD-DCE detected seven missed SSAs/Ps (IDR = 53.9%; 95% CI: 29.1-76.8%). Logistic regression found that HD-DCE increased the detection of SSAs/Ps compared to HD-WLE and/or HD-NBI (odds ratio (OR) = 3.16, 95% CI: 0.83-11.92, p = 0.08). DCE in addition to HD-WLE improved the detection of SSAs/Ps, but not dysplasia, in patients with long-standing extensive UC.

P164 Dysplasia detection rates in a surveillance program real-world data from a tertiary referral center for inflammatory bowel diseases

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) with an increased risk of developing colorectal carcinoma should undergo periodic surveillance colonoscopies. There is no quality metric for dysplasia detection rate (DDR) in IBD surveillance. We evaluated DDR in a dedicated surveillance program at a tertiary IBD referral center. Methods This cross-sectional study assessed DDR among consecutive patients with quiescent colitis enrolled in our surveillance program. Patients underwent high-definition colonoscopy with dye chromoendoscopy (DCE). A single specialized operator performed the procedures. Advanced dysplasia (AD) was defined as low-grade dysplasia ≥ 10mm, high-grade dysplasia, or colorectal cancer. We evaluated risk factors for dysplasia detection. Results Overall, 119 patients [female: 39.5%; median age: 54 years (IQR 43-66); median disease duration: 20 years (IQR 14-29)] underwent 151 procedures that revealed 206 lesions, of which 40 were dysplastic, and seven were considered AD. Per-procedure and per-lesion DDR were: 20.5%, and 19.4%, respectively. Per-procedure AD detection rate (ADDR) was 4.6%. Per-procedure dysplasia detection was associated with increased age at diagnosis at the index colonoscopy and past dysplasia or indefinite dysplasia, however, on multivariable analysis, only past dysplasia or indefinite dysplasia maintained a significant association (AdjOR 4.84, 95% CI 1.52-15.45, p=0.008). A Kudo pit pattern of II-V had a sensitivity of 92.5% for per-lesion dysplasia detection but a false positive rate of 64.8% (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion DDR in a dedicated surveillance program in a real-world setting reached 20%. DDR should be considered a quality measure while surveying high-risk patients with IBD.

Wide Variability in Dysplasia Detection Rate and Adherence to Seattle Protocol and Surveillance Recommendations in Barrett's Esophagus: A Population-Based Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Quality Benchmarking Registry.

Variability in adherence rates to the Seattle protocol and to surveillance interval recommendations, established quality indicators (QIs) in Barrett's esophagus (BE), is unknown. We evaluated endoscopist and site-based adherence rates to these QIs from January 2018 to May 2021 using the GI Quality Improvement Consortium national registry with matched endoscopy and pathology data. Across 153 practices with 572 endoscopists performing 20,155 endoscopies, adherence to the Seattle protocol varied by endoscopists (median 93.8%, IQR 18.9%) and by site (median 90.0%, IQR 20.1%). Adherence to appropriate surveillance intervals for nondysplastic BE also varied by endoscopist (median 82.4%, IQR 36.3%) and site (median 77.2%, IQR 29.8%). The overall dysplasia detection rate was 3.1% and varied among endoscopists and sites. These US population-based results can serve as a benchmark for quality initiatives and intervention trials aimed at improving outcomes for patients with BE.