In the 1970’s and 80’s in the United States, American newspapers raised public awareness about cults. Capturing headlines were articles about women, and later men, who followed Charles Manson to the extreme length of committing “Helter Skelter,” a cold-blooded killing spree. Cults continued to exist, out of sight and unobserved, until each next tragic occurrence when they would again be the topic of a news story. Even when cults did not achieve “front-page” status in the news, they continued to recruit adults and raise children born into the group.Because cults are undocumented and do not appear in our census, it is difficult to estimate how many are in the United States today. Estimates range from 2,500 to 8,000 cults in the United States, with their membership ranging from a few individuals to tens of thousands in any given cult. According to the International Cultic Studies Association (“ICSA”), an organization that monitors cults and provides education and counseling, approximately 2,500,000 Americans have joined cultic groups since the 1970s. Some cults are benign, others destructive; cults may change over time, sometimes from benign to destructive, sometimes vice versa. Benign cults appear not to inflict physical or emotional trauma to their members. In contrast, destructive cults do harm members, in large part because they are characterized by exploitatively manipulative and controlling interpersonal dynamics. Destructive cults are the focus of this paper. (The term “cult” is more commonly used in the United States; whereas, “sect” is used more prevalently in Europe.) Cults continue to evade our justice system here in the United States and abroad. This paper seeks to offer a fresh legal framework, which, I posit, could aid in the capture and prosecution of cult leaders for their crimes.In Part I, I describe how cults function. In Subpart (A), I describe a young girl’s (Elissa Wall) tragic marriage into a lifetime, and expected eternity, with a relative whom she initially resisted. Cults use four processes of control involving the mind, behavior, emotion and information, explained in (B). In Subpart (C), cults are categorized as religious, political, terrorist groups, psychotherapy, and commercial. The shortcomings of our legal system to provide remedies is set forth in Subpart (D). In Part II, international and American efforts to prevent and combat trafficking are presented. In Part III, I posit that law enforcement and the international community use the anti-trafficking laws and resources in capturing cult leaders, prosecuting them for the harm that they inflict on their adherents, and to provide services to former cult members. In this way, the religious or political dogma of cults is not an obstacle to holding them accountable for their criminal behavior.
Read full abstract