Design Of Vitamin Research Articles

Associations between vitamin D and autoimmune diseases: Mendelian randomization analysis

ObjectiveThe VITAL trial of vitamin D supplementation suggested a possible protective effect for autoimmune diseases but uncertainties remain. We investigated potential causal effects of vitamin D on composite and individual autoimmune diseases using Mendelian randomization. MethodsWe used data from 332,984 participants of the UK Biobank of whom 23,089 had at least one autoimmune disease defined using ICD code and/or self-report. Diseases were further considered in mechanistic subgroups driven by “autoimmunity” (n = 12,774) or “autoinflammation” (n = 11,164), then individually. We selected variants within gene regions implicated in vitamin D biology to generate a weighted genetic score. We performed population-wide analysis using the ratio method, then examined non-linear effects across five quantiles based on 25-hydroxycholecalciferol levels. ResultsGenetically-predicted vitamin D was associated with lower risk of diseases in the autoinflammation group (OR 0.95 per 10 ng/ml increase in 25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 95%CI 0.91–0.99; p = 0.03) but not the autoimmunity group (OR 0.99; 95%CI 0.95–1.03; p = 0.64) or combined. When considering individual diseases, genetically-predicted vitamin D was associated with lower risk of psoriasis (OR 0.91; 95%CI 0.85–0.97; p = 0.005), the most common disease in the autoinflammation group, and suggestively with systemic lupus erythematosus (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.69–1.02; p = 0.08); results were replicated using data from independent studies. We found no evidence for a plausible non-linear relationship between vitamin D and any outcome. ConclusionsWe found genetic evidence to support a causal link between 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentrations and psoriasis and systemic lupus erythematosus. These results have implications for potential disease prevention strategies, and the interpretation and design of vitamin D supplementation trials.

Title: Understanding a Low Vitamin D State in the Context of COVID-19.

While a low vitamin D state has been associated with an increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 in addition to an increased severity of COVID-19 disease, a causal role is not yet established. Here, we review the evidence relating to i) vitamin D and its role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease ii) the vitamin D status in the Irish adult population iii) the use of supplemental vitamin D to treat a deficient status and iv) the application of the Bradford-Hill causation criteria. We conclude that reverse causality probably makes a minimal contribution to the presence of low vitamin D states in the setting of COVID-19. Applying the Bradford-Hill criteria, however, the collective literature supports a causal association between low vitamin D status, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and severe COVID-19 (respiratory failure, requirement for ventilation and mortality). A biologically plausible rationale exists for these findings, given vitamin D’s role in immune regulation. The thresholds which define low, deficient, and replete vitamin D states vary according to the disease studied, underscoring the complexities for determining the goals for supplementation. All are currently unknown in the setting of COVID-19. The design of vitamin D randomised controlled trials is notoriously problematic and these trials commonly fail for a number of behavioural and methodological reasons. In Ireland, as in most other countries, low vitamin D status is common in older adults, adults in institutions, and with obesity, dark skin, low UVB exposure, diabetes and low socio-economic status. Physiological vitamin D levels for optimal immune function are considerably higher than those that can be achieved from food and sunlight exposure alone in Ireland. A window exists in which a significant number of adults could benefit from vitamin D supplementation, not least because of recent data demonstrating an association between vitamin D status and COVID-19. During the COVID pandemic, we believe that supplementation with 20-25ug (800–1000 IU)/day or more may be required for adults with apparently normal immune systems to improve immunity against SARS-CoV-2. We expect that higher monitored doses of 37.5–50 ug (1,500–2,000)/day may be needed for vulnerable groups (e.g., those with obesity, darker skin, diabetes mellitus and older adults). Such doses are within the safe daily intakes cited by international advisory agencies.

Sex-Specific 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Threshold Concentrations for Functional Outcomes in Older Adults

25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] has extra-skeletal effects, but it is not known whether the minimum sufficient serum levels for such targets, like muscle, differ from those for bone health (typically recommended at 20 or 30 ng/dL). Therefore, we derived and validated sex-specific thresholds for serum 25(OH)D predictive of poor physical function using 5 cohorts comprising 16,388 community-dwelling older adults (60.9% women). Using a cohort-stratified random two-thirds sample, we found incident slow gait was best discriminated by 25(OH)D<24.0 versus 25(OH)D>=24.0 ng/mL among women (Relative Risk=1.29; 95% CI 1.10-1.50) and 25(OH)D<21.0 versus 25(OH)D >=21.0 ng/mL among men (RR=1.43; 95% CI 1.01-2.02). Estimates from the remaining one-third validation sample were similar. Empirically identified and validated sex-specific 25(OH)D thresholds from multiple well-characterized cohorts of older adults may yield more biologically meaningful definitions in important sub-populations. Such thresholds may serve as candidate reference concentrations or inform design of vitamin D intervention trials in older adults.

Sex-specific 25-hydroxyvitamin D threshold concentrations for functional outcomes in older adults: PRoject on Optimal VItamin D in Older adults (PROVIDO)

Threshold serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations for extraskeletal outcomes are uncertain and could differ from recommendations (20-30 ng/mL) for skeletal health. We aimed to identify and validate sex-specific threshold 25(OH)D concentrations for older adults' physical function. Using 5 large prospective, population-based studies-Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik (n=4858, Iceland); Health, Aging, and Body Composition (n=2494, United States); Invecchiare in Chianti (n=873, Italy); Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (n=2301, United States); and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (n=5862, United States)-we assessed 16,388 community-dwelling adults (10,376 women, 6012 men) aged≥65 y. We analyzed 25(OH)D concentrations with the primary outcome (incident slow gait: women <0.8 m/s; men <0.825 m/s) and secondary outcomes (gait speed, incident self-reported mobility, and stair climb impairment) at median 3.0-y follow-up. We identified sex-specific 25(OH)D thresholds that best discriminated incident slow gait using machine learning in training data (2/3 cohort-stratified random sample) and validated using the remaining (validation) data and secondary outcomes. Mean age in the cohorts ranged from 74.4 to 76.5 y in women and from 73.3 to 76.6 y in men. Overall, 1112/6123 women (18.2%) and 494/3937 men (12.5%) experienced incident slow gait, 1098/7011 women (15.7%) and 474/3962 men (12.0%) experienced incident mobility impairment, and 1044/6941 women (15.0%) and 432/3993 men (10.8%) experienced incident stair climb impairment. Slow gait was best discriminated by 25(OH)D<24.0 ng/mL compared with 25(OH)D≥24.0 ng/mL in women (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.50) and 25(OH)D<21.0 ng/mL compared with 25(OH)D≥21.0 ng/mL in men (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.02). Most associations between 25(OH)D and secondary outcomes were modest; estimates were similar between validation and training datasets. Empirically identified and validated sex-specific threshold 25(OH)D concentrations for physical function for older adults, 24.0 ng/mL for women and 21.0 ng/mL for men, may inform candidate reference concentrations or the design of vitamin D intervention trials.