Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Research Articles

Changes in the Visual Field Test after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Advanced Glaucoma.

Background: To evaluate changes in the visual field (VF) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with advanced glaucoma and previous trabeculectomy. Methods: Changes in VF, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of glaucoma medications were analyzed before and after DSAEK in 19 eyes. The VFs were evaluated using the 10-2 program of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and/or Goldmann perimetry (GP). Results: In nine eyes, the MD improved from -22.24 ± 6.5 dB to -18.36 ± 5.1 dB in HFA. In five out of nine eyes, postoperative MD improved >1 dB compared to preoperative MD. In GP testing, 10 out of 15 eyes showed an improvement, that is, greater than 20° in VF enlargement by the isopter of I-4e and/or new detection of a smaller or darker isopter. Overall, improvement in VF with the HFA and/or GP test was observed in 12/19 (63.2%) eyes after DSAEK. Postoperative BCVA improved by more than two lines in logMAR VA in 18 of 19 (94.7%) eyes. There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative IOP and the number of glaucoma medications. Conclusions: DSAEK may produce subjective improvement in the visual field as well as improved visual acuity, even in advanced glaucomatous eyes.

Modified Method for Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

The purpose of this study was to describe a method to achieve a high success rate for nanothin (NT, ≤50 μm) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft preparation using anterior chamber pressurizer (ACP) with a modified setting and evaluate its postoperative efficacy. A prospective cohort (study group) of 24 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction was consecutively enrolled and received DSAEK grafts using the modified ACP method from December 2021 to May 2022. The control group included 24 historical patients who received DSAEK grafts using conventional ACP procedure. Central graft thickness (CGT), graft regularity (3-mm and 5-mm diameter zones), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and endothelial cell density (ECD) were compared between 2 groups. A 100% ultrathin (UT, ≤100 μm) DSAEK rate and 62.5% NT-DSAEK rate was achieved at 3 months postsurgery in the study group, with a 51.3 ± 14.8 μm CGT, while a 70.8% UT-DSAEK rate and 4.2% NT-DSAEK rate was achieved in the control group, with an 89.0 ± 15.4 μm CGT (P <0.001). At 3-month postoperative follow-up, the regularity of graft thickness was significantly better in the study group (central-to-peripheral thickness difference: P = 0.044 and 0.014 for 3-mm and 5-mm diameter zones, respectively, graft thickness uniformity: P <0.001 and 0.012, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.170) or ECD (P = 0.833) between 2 groups at 3-month postoperative follow-up. DSAEK grafts harvested using modified ACP method were thinner and more regular compared with the conventional ACP method.

Glaucoma drainage device implantation and cyclophotocoagulation in the management of refractory glaucoma after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

To compare the surgical outcomes of glaucoma drainage device implantation (GDI) and trans-scleral neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) in the management of refractory glaucoma after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). This retrospective study on observational case series enrolled 29 patients who underwent DSAEK and posterior anti-glaucoma surgery (15 with GDI and 14 with CPC). The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma surgery success rate (defined as IOP of 6-21 mm Hg without additional anti-glaucoma operation), number of glaucoma medications, endothelial graft status, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The mean follow-up time was 34.1 and 21.0mo for DSAEK or glaucoma surgeries, both for the GDI and CPC groups. Both groups showed significant IOP reduction after glaucoma surgery. The GDI group presented a significantly higher success rate in IOP control than the CPC group (60% vs 21.4%, P=0.03). Both procedures significantly decreased the number of glaucoma medications (P=0.03). Forty percent and 57% of cases in the GDI and the CPC group, respectively, experienced endothelial graft failure during follow-up (P=0.36). Significantly worse BCVA after surgery was observed in the CPC group but not in the GDI group. Both GDI and CPC significantly decrease IOP in eyes with glaucoma after DSAEK. GDI is preferable to CPC in refractory glaucoma cases after DSAEK, as it manifests a significantly higher success rate for IOP control, similar endothelial graft failure rate, and relatively preserves BCVA than CPC.

Anatomical and functional results of femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty compared to microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Abstract Introduction: Femtosecond laser devices have been praised for their precision in corneal surgery; however, their performance in endothelial corneal graft surgery is still in development compared to the standard microkeratome technique. The purpose of this study is to describe the anatomical and functional differences in surgical outcomes between microkeratome (mk) and femtosecond laser (fs) assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: This is an analytic, observational, pilot study of patients who underwent mk-DSAEK or fs-DSAEK. The data were obtained from the clinical records and the institutional transplant registry with a focus on graft measurements, survival, transparency, visual acuity and was further analyzed. Results: A total of 37 participants were included in the study with 70.3% (n = 26) of them being female and 29.7% of them being male (n = 11). Of the 37 eyes, 23 (62.2%) of them underwent mk-DSAEK and 14 (37.8%) of them underwent fs-DSAEK. Optimized femtosecond laser parameters are reported. There was a statistically significant difference in donor graft thickness which was thinner in the fs-DSAEK group with a median of 110 mm interquartile range (IQR) (102.25–117.5) versus a median of 233 mm IQR (219–243.75) P = 0.00 in the mk-DSAEK group. There were no significant differences for other variables between techniques. Conclusion: Fs-DSAEK allowed significantly thinner graft obtention in comparison to mk-DSAEK; however, there were no significant differences between mk-DSAEK and fs-DSAEK in terms of transparency, graft survival, or visual acuity.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.

To assess the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) via a sclerocorneal frown incision. Retrospective comparative study. The outcomes of Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were retrospectively compared between 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 3.8-mm frown incision (frown incision group) and 20 patients (20 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 4.6-mm straight incision (straight incision group). In all patients, an NS Endo-Inserter was used as the graft inserter and the incision for a frown incision was via the superior sclerocorneal site and for the straight incision via the temporal cornea. DSAEK was performed by the standard technique, except for the incision. At 1 year after surgery, the two groups were compared with respect to the visual acuity, decrease of corneal endothelial cell density, the severity of corneal astigmatism (diopters), the number of sutures for wound closure, and intraoperative/postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and intraoperative/postoperative complications one year after surgery. On the other hand, the number of sutures required for wound closure was 1.13±0.42 in the frown incision group, whereas in the straight incision group, it was 3.20±0.40, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). In addition, there was no decreased corneal endothelial cell density associated with the reduction in incision width. A sclerocorneal frown incision is useful for performing DSAEK with an NS Endo-Inserter as it does not affect endothelial cell loss despite its short incision width.

Change in posterior astigmatism with degree of decentring graft in patients with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Aims/Purpose: Aligning the center of grafts in patients with Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) is difficult but important process. We investigated how the graft centring affected posterior astigmatism in patients.Methods: This study analysed 63 patients (63 eyes) who received DSAEK. Postoperative posterior astigmatism of patients was measured using pentacam, and the decentring of the graft was measured by using the distance between the patient's optic centre and the centre of the graft. Correlation analysis was performed on the relationship between graft decentring and posterior astigmatism. In addition, the spherical aberration of the cornea before and after surgery was analysed and investigated.Results: The average posterior astigmatism of the patients before surgery was 1.70 ± 2.25, and the average posterior astigmatism was 0.66D ± 0.43, confirming a decrease in posterior astigmatism after surgery (p &lt; 0.05). The mean decentring of graft was 0.45 ± 0.33 mm. Preoperative spherical aberration was 0.192 ± 0.53 and postoperative spherical aberration was 0.044 ± 0.37, and these differences were not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05). Analysis of the relationship between graft decentring and postoperative posterior astigmatism showed no statistically significant correlation (p &gt; 0.05).Conclusions: In this study, no significant correlation was found between centring of the graft and posterior astigmatism after surgery. However, centring of the graft in DSAEK plays an important role in graft survival and postoperative prognosis, surgeons should pay attention to centring well during surgery.

Simultaneous simple limbal epithelial transplant and Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for a case of presumed “Munchausen syndrome by proxy”: A novel surgical technique

We attempt to introduce the technique of the application of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the same eye at the same sitting for a case of unilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) with endothelial decompensation and scarring. The operated eye showed significant healing within 6 months of the surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first case of unilateral total LSCD with endothelial decompensation and scarring managed by both SLET and DSAEK in the same eye.

Clinicopathologic Analyses of Failed Endothelial Keratoplasty (the Clinical Cases)

Purpose: To evaluate the clinicopathologic features of failed endothelial keratoplasty. Methods. In this study 11 patients (11 eyes) with recurrence of bullous keratopathy (BK) were included. Group 1 consisted of 4 patients who underwent repeat Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), group 2 included 7 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) after failed Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT), RTVue-100, Optovue, USA, was performed. Intraoperatively aqueous humour (AqH) samples were collected for multiplex cytokine analysis. During keratoplasty failed grafts/corneal buttons were obtained and then investigated histologically (hematoxylin/eosin staining, primary antibodies to pancytokeratin, vimentin, collagen III). Results. Recurrence of BK in all clinical cases manifests by the increase of inflammatory factors in AqH, corneal edema, neovascularization and remodeling to fibrosis. Glaucoma may induce DMEK/ DSAEK graft failure due to chronic local inflammation. In the clinical cases recurrence of BK was caused by peripheral and central graft detachment, rebubbling, graft upside-down orientation and donor corneal genetic disorders. Conclusions. Chronic local inflammation (including corneal morphological changes) in patients with BK recurrence is an indication for reoperation. The modification of keratoplasty — DMEK/DSAEK/PK — is determined according to slit-lamp and OCT images of the cornea. High-level risk of immune reaction (especially in cases of three and more times repeated keratolasty) is the reason for systemic corticosteroid and, sometimes, cytostatic therapy.

Netarsudil-Associated Reticular Epithelial Edema Directly Influenced by Endothelial Dysfunction in a Post-Endothelial Keratoplasty Patient

Purpose: The purpose of this report was to describe a case in which reticular epithelial edema secondary to topical netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.2% occurred directly in relation to focal endothelial dysfunction in a post-endothelial keratoplasty eye. Methods: This was a case report. Results: A 76-year-old man with a complex ocular history was diagnosed with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy of the left eye. Topical netarsudil was prescribed to treat his glaucoma and to attempt improvement of his corneal edema. The corneal examination remained stable for many months, but the patient eventually underwent a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for worsening corneal edema. One week later, the patient was observed to have 360-degree reticular epithelial edema around the periphery of the DSAEK graft. Given the lack of visual significance and need for continued glaucoma treatment, the patient was continued on netarsudil. The reticular epithelial edema later became restricted to areas outside the graft zone as the peripheral DSAEK graft endothelial cell function improved. Two months post-DSAEK, the patient developed a partial inferior endothelial graft rejection related to inadvertent cessation of topical steroid, with keratic precipitates, stromal edema, and new overlying reticular epithelial edema. On treatment and resolution of the DSAEK graft rejection, the overlying reticular epithelial edema also resolved. Conclusions: This case clearly demonstrates that netarsudil-associated reticular epithelial edema is highly likely to be related to endothelial cell dysfunction and that if endothelial cell dysfunction improves, the reticular epithelial edema will also improve, despite the continuation of netarsudil.

Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft-Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study.

To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft-host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea. Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft-host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CDcentral), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CDI,II,III,IV,V,VI). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure. DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of -7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK (p < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CDCentral,I,II,III,IV,V,VI values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group (p < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively (p < 0.001). CD patterns at the graft-host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy masking an underlying postrefractive surgery ectasia

Introduction: This article describes a case presenting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) masking an underlying postrefractive surgery ectasia. Patient and Clinical Findings: A 69-year-old woman presented in January 2022 with blurriness, halos, and glare in the left eye. Ocular history included a photorefractive keratectomy performed twice in her left eye in 2007 for hyperopic astigmatism. A diagnosis of asymptomatic Fuchs dystrophy was noted in 2010. She had acute decompensation of the cornea in the left eye because of FECD, and the first Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with cataract surgery was performed in 2018. Diagnosis, Intervention, and Clinical Findings: The patient had a failed DSAEK graft in the left eye. A repeat DSAEK was performed in 2022, and 6 months postoperatively, the patient started showing signs of ectasia in the left eye. The authors believe the ectasia was preexisting but masked by the failed DSAEK graft and FECD and started showing after corneal deturgescence postoperatively. Conclusions: The presence of FECD and corneal ectasia can complicate diagnosis because of overlapping clinical and topographic features. This case highlights the importance of preoperative topography with epithelial/stromal thickness mapping in patients with a history of multiple refractive corneal procedures to consider the possibility of ectasia and prevent unforeseen outcomes and complications. Further research is necessary to determine standardized imaging techniques, particularly in cases of concurrent diseases.

Size and Shape Matter: Cell Viability of Preloaded Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts in Three Different Carriers.

The aim of this study was to examine endothelial cell loss (ECL) associated with preloaded Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) grafts loaded into 3 carriers of different size and shape. Thirty-six donor corneas were prepared for DSAEK and loaded into an EndoGlide Ultrathin (control) (2.0 mm × 3.5 mm lumen, 4.5 mm/4.9 mm incision for scleral tunnel/clear corneal insertion), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty EndoGlide (experimental) (1.1 mm × 1.7 mm lumen, 2.65 mm incision), or round glass Jones tube (experimental) (1.8 mm lumen, 3.0 mm incision). Control grafts were stored for 6 days in Optisol-GS and experimental grafts stored for 24 hours in Life4C before analysis using Calcein AM staining. Grafts were imaged and ECL was analyzed by FIJI segmentation. The statistical significance of ECL was determined using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis. There were no significant differences in donor characteristics for grafts in each cohort. ECL for grafts loaded into the EndoGlide Ultrathin was 10.3% ± 2.3% (graft thickness: 60-189 μm, n = 9). ECL for grafts loaded into the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty EndoGlide was 22.2% ± 7.1% (graft thickness: 38-63 μm, n = 9). ECL for thin grafts (34-60 μm, n = 9) loaded into the Jones tube was 24.0% ± 5.0%. ECL for thick grafts (92-119 μm, n = 9) loaded into the Jones tube was 34.2% ± 6.1% ECL ( P < 0.001). Combined regression analysis revealed that graft thickness is directly correlated to ECL ( P < 0.01). The size and shape of the carrier can influence the cell viability of preloaded DSAEK grafts. Compared with a larger carrier, smaller lumen carriers are associated with greater ECL. In smaller lumen carriers, ECL increases with increasing DSAEK graft thickness.

Preoperative surgeon evaluation of corneal endothelial status: the Viability Control of Human Endothelial Cells before Keratoplasty (V-CHECK) study protocol

IntroductionThe success of keratoplasty strongly depends on the health status of the transplanted endothelial cells. Donor corneal tissues are routinely screened for endothelial damage before shipment; however, surgical teams have...

Clinical outcomes of Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty using a manual or automated procedure at Undaan Eye Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia: with one-year follow up

Background: Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is a selective lamellar corneal transplantation technique that replaces damaged endothelium while preserving the patient's corneal stroma. Donor graft preparation can be done using Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Research on EK in Indonesia is currently underreported, but it is crucial for developing strategies to treat corneal blindness in the future. This study aimed to present visual acuity, graft survival, and complications after DSEK or DSAEK at Undaan Eye Hospital Surabaya. Methods: This study involved 17 eyes, treated with DSEK or DSAEK surgery between 2017 and 2022. Patients with other ocular diseases and incomplete medical records were excluded. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was documented before the surgery, and at 1 day, 1, 3, 6 months, and 1 year after. Data in this study were analyzed using multiple techniques, including Wilcoxon, Kaplan-Meier survival, and bivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The postoperative mean BCVA significantly increased to 1.36 ± 0.57 logMAR (p=0.012) at 1 day, 1.02 ± 0.62 logMAR (p=0.002) at 1 month, 0.94 ± 0.66 logMAR (p=0.002) at 3 months, 0.72 ± 0.66 logMAR at 6 months (p=0.000), and 0.74 ± 0.74 logMAR (p=0.001) at 1-year compared to preoperative BCVA of 1.84 ± 0.39 logMAR. The graft could survive 100% within 1 day to 6 months and 76% within 1 year after surgery. Bivariate logistic regression showed donor origin had a statistically significant effect with p-value = 0.031 and odds ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.003 - 3.229. Corneal edema was the most common complication in the early and late postoperative periods. Conclusion: DSEK or DSAEK surgery is safe, effective, and viable. It shows good visual outcomes and becomes the most used EK treatment for corneal endothelial dysfunction.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison

To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK). Registry-based study with propensity score matching. One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through2019. All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure. The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P= 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group. Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Corneal transplantation at the beginning of the 21th century

Corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) is necessary when various disorders result in corneal opacities with severe visual loss that cannot be treated conservatively, or the regular structure and curvature of the cornea is distorted, and its function is lost. Among human transplantation, keratoplasty is the most successful surgical procedure. In recent decades, penetrating keratoplasties have been increasingly replaced by lamellar techniques, where only the abnormal layer of the cornea is transplanted. The anterior form is deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), recommended mainly for keratoconus. The main forms of posterior lamellar keratoplasty are Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). The indications are bullous keratopathy after cataract surgery with endothelial destruction and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Lamellar keratoplasty has several advantages over penetrating surgery. Postoperative visual acuity is better, wound healing, patient rehabilitation are faster and the course of any immune rejection is milder and can be better managed. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(28): 1087-1093.

Association Between Indication for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Rural Residency.

Residing in rural locations can be a barrier to health care access. This study investigated the impact of residing in rural and small town (RST) areas on Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) indications and outcomes in Atlantic Canada. A retrospective cohort analysis examined consecutive DSAEKs performed in Nova Scotia between 2017 and 2020. Patient rurality was determined by the Statistical Area Classification system developed by Statistics Canada. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess for factors associated with DSAEK indication, including repeat keratoplasty, RST residence status, and travel time. Of 271 DSAEKs during the study period, 87 (32.1%) were performed on the eyes of RST residents. The median postoperative follow-up time was 1.6 years. Undergoing DSAEK for a previous failed keratoplasty was not associated with a higher odds of RST residency (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.16; P = 0.13) but was associated with travel time (OR, 0.78 for each increasing hour of travel; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99; P = 0.044). RST residency was not associated with the occurrence of graft failure (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.17; P = 0.13). Residing in a rural area in Atlantic Canada was not associated with DSAEK graft failure. Repeat endothelial keratoplasty was associated with shorter travel time for corneal surgery but not rural residency status. Further research in this field could inform regional health strategies aimed at improving equity and accessibility to ophthalmology subspecialist care.

Ex-PRESS shunt combined with ab-interno peripheral iridectomy: A new surgical procedure for iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

PurposeIridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome may cause refractory glaucoma due to progressive synechial closure or membrane formation at the anterior chamber angle. Filtration surgeries are often required but are associated with a higher rate of surgical failure or complications than other types of glaucoma. Herein, we report a new and effective surgical procedure for glaucoma secondary to ICE syndrome: Ex-PRESS shunt combined with ab-interno peripheral iridectomy using a small-gauge vitreous cutter. MethodsThree patients with ICE syndrome who underwent surgery were included. Intraoperatively, an ab-interno peripheral iridectomy was performed using a small-gauge vitreous cutter through a corneal incision in the superior-nasal or superior-temporal quadrants to create space for the insertion of Ex-PRESS shunt free from the iris tissue. The shunt was inserted under the scleral flap. The first patient underwent combined cataract surgery, whereas patients 2 (pseudophakia) and 3 (phakia) underwent Ex-PRESS alone. ResultsNo intraoperative complications were observed. The intraocular pressure remained stable until the final postoperative visits at approximately 7, 4, and 1 year in Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Case 2, with mild preoperative corneal edema due to graft failure in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), underwent reDSAEK 6 months postoperatively. Conclusions and importanceEx-PRESS shunt combined with ab-interno peripheral iridectomy using a small-gauge vitreous cutter may be a safe and effective surgical procedure in patients with ICE syndrome, regardless of the lens status.

Donor lamella thickness after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and its relation to postoperative visual acuity and pre-operative lamella measures

BackgroundTo accurately measure ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) donor lamella thickness during the first postoperative year and to correlate this with pre-operative and other postoperative measurements.MethodsDonor lamella thickness in 41 eyes undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) was measured using the Tomey Casia OCT directly after graft preparation and at 1 week and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Visual acuity and endothelial cell density were measured as the secondary parameters.ResultsIndividual graft thickness profiles were shown to be fairly regular within the optically relevant area. There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the pre- and postoperative lamellar thicknesses at all time points (p < 0.0001). Compared with the measurements directly after preparation at the cornea bank, the lamella thickness decreased by 12% after 12 months. Between 1 and 12 months postoperatively, the lamella thickness (mean ± SD) changed from 112 ± 27 μm to 101 ± 21 μm. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) changed from 0.46 ± 0.30 logMAR pre-operatively through 0.36 ± 0.33 at 1 month to 0.13 ± 0.16 at 1 year postoperatively. The endothelial cell counts were comparable to those reported in previous studies.ConclusionsThickness profiles of individual grafts were fairly regular within the optically relevant area. A strong relationship between pre- and postoperative graft thicknesses was detected, and ultrathin DSAEK grafts prepared using methods similar to that applied in this study are expected to show a deswelling of around 12% during the first postoperative year. No correlation was detected between graft thickness and BSCVA.

Cost Drivers of Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

To determine cost drivers of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) through evaluation of surgical costs and procedure length based on type of EK, use of preloaded grafts, and performance of simultaneous cataract surgery. This study was an economic analysis of EKs at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing methodology (TDABC). EK surgical cases, including Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2016 to 2018 were included in the analysis. Data and inputs were obtained via the electronic health record and from prior literature. Simultaneous cataract surgeries were included and separately categorized for analysis. EK expenses were determined with TDABC, a method for cost calculation that incorporates the time that key resources are used and each resource's associated cost rate. Main outcome measures included surgery length (in minutes) and day-of-surgery costs. There were 559 EKs included, 355 DMEK and 204 DSAEK. Fewer DSAEKs had simultaneous cataract extraction (47, 23%) than DMEK (169, 48%). Of the DMEKs, 196 (55%) utilized preloaded corneal grafts. DMEK cost $392.31 less [95% confidence interval ($251.05, $533.57), P < 0.0001] than DSAEK and required 16.94 fewer minutes [(14.16, 19.73), P < 0.0001]. DMEK cases that utilized preloaded corneal grafts cost $460.19 less [($316.23, $604.14), P < 0.0001] and were 14.16 minutes shorter [(11.39, 16.93), P < 0.0001]. In multivariate regression, preloaded graft use saved $457.19, DMEK (compared to DSAEK) saved $349.97, and simultaneous cataract surgery added $855.17 in day-of-surgery costs. TDABC cost analysis identified a day-of-surgery cost and surgical time reduction associated with the use of preloaded grafts for DMEK, DMEK compared to DSAEK, and isolated EK compared to EK combined with cataract surgery. This study provides an improved understanding of surgical cost drivers and margin incentivization, which may explain trends and indirectly influence patient care decisions in cornea surgery practices.