Dermatology Residents Research Articles

Workforce Analysis of Dermatology Residency Programs within the United States

Workforce Analysis of Dermatology Residency Programs within the United States

Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023-2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis.

Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023-2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023-2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215-277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant (P = 0.031), but did not affect match rates (P = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates (P = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.

Survey Defining Lip Health-Dermatology and Health Care Providers' Perspectives.

There currently exists no consensus on objective features which are relevant in the assessment of overall lip health. This study seeks to identify features and factors that are associated with healthy lips. This survey will ultimately enable clinicians to objectively track lip health for clinical evaluations and clinical research. An anonymous survey was conducted among allied healthcare professionals in-person and through email. The survey contained questions designed to assess the importance of features of lip health using a 5-point Likert scale. Features included lack of lip dryness; even tone or lack of hyperpigmentation; lip smoothness; lip color; lip shine, radiance, or luster; definition of the vermillion border/defined lip contour; lip fullness or plumpness; lack of lip lines; and lip firmness. The final questions prompted respondents to select the top three most important features when assessing lip health and to provide any additional pertinent factors. A total of 334 responses were received, including board-certified dermatologists (35.9%), dermatology residents (14.7%), and other healthcare specialties (49.4%). The features most cited were lack of lip dryness (65.8%), lip smoothness (38.4%), even tone or lack of hyperpigmentation (38.1%), definition of the vermillion border/defined lip contour (28.0%). Survey results reveal that lip dryness, lip smoothness, lack of hyperpigmentation, and definition of the vermillion border/defined lip contour were the features most associated with lip health. The results from this survey will provide a basis for future research in the field of lip health, research, and clinical treatment.

Patient safety and quality improvement education in dermatology residency programs: a nationwide survey of program directors.

Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (PSQI) are key components of graduate medical training, as detailed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), with specific requirements that residents participate in experiential learning in PSQI during residency training. This study aimed to analyze the breadth of available and required PSQI educational experiences across dermatology residency programs in the United States. The objective of this study was to characterize the scope of PSQI educational experiences across dermatology residency programs. We electronically surveyed program directors of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residency programs from September 2023 to March 2024. Responses to the survey were anonymously collected with Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Of the 145 dermatology programs surveyed, 37 program directors responded (25.5%). 89.2% of programs reported requiring residents to participate in PSQI educational experiences, with the most common being participation in a resident-led QI project (70.3%), which was also the most commonly available experience (91.2%). The least common required experience was observed simulated patient safety events and analyses. 83.8% of programs reported formal mechanisms to assess residents' competency in QI. This study highlights variation in PSQI experiences within dermatology residency programs across the United States. More than 10% of surveyed programs reported no required QI experiences during residency training despite ACGME program requirements. Additional gaps include variation in assessment of resident PSQI competencies. This study provides insight on the current landscape of PSQI education across dermatology residency programs and identifies opportunities to strengthen dermatology programs' PSQI educational offerings.

Bibliometric Analysis of Dermatology and Venereology Residency Dissertations in Türkiye between 1968 and 2023: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

Bibliometric Analysis of Dermatology and Venereology Residency Dissertations in Türkiye between 1968 and 2023: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

Comprehensive review of resources and strategy for dermatology board certification exams in the United States.

This article offers an up-to-date overview of resources tailored for dermatology residents in the United States preparing for their board certification exams. We have assembled a comprehensive list of exam preparation resources categorized by cost, alongside recommendations from attending and resident physicians regarding the most effective resources for each exam. Although examinations are only one facet of the training involved in becoming a competent dermatologist, these exams help residents focus on learning crucial aspects of medicine. This review aims to furnish a concise summary of available resources for dermatology residents, organized by cost. The average cost of a paid dermatology question bank resource in this review was approximately $279, reflecting the need for review resources for board exam preparation that can fit a resident physician's budget or are free to use.

Implementing geriatric topics in dermatology residency program education: recommendations and approaches to consider.

Implementing geriatric topics in dermatology residency program education: recommendations and approaches to consider.

The importance of pathway programs in increasing diversity in dermatology: Efforts made by the American Academy of Dermatology

Our country's population continues to diversify, highlighting the need for an equally diverse physician workforce to care for patients. Unfortunately, the percentage of underrepresented minority residents in dermatology has remained relatively unchanged over the past several years. To address this disparity, the American Academy of Dermatology created the Pathways Programs to focus on early exposure to dermatology, skill-building workshops, research, and mentorship. The overarching goal is to increase the number of underrepresented minority dermatologists, which will result in improved patient care and mitigation of healthcare disparities.

Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview.

Dermatology lags behind other medical specialties in workforce diversity, particularly regarding gender, race, and ethnicity. This study aims to analyze the current demographics of dermatology physicians in the United States, comparing them with other medical specialties, the overall population of practicing U.S. physicians, and the U.S. population as a whole. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the U.S. Census Bureau (2007-2022) were used to evaluate gender, racial, and ethnic diversity within dermatology. Demographic factors analyzed included gender, race, and ethnicity, with racial categories grouped as White, Asian, and underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM). Chi-square tests assessed the fit of gender and age distributions with population proportions, while linear regression models examined trends over time. From 2007 to 2021, the number of dermatologists grew by 22.9%, with a corresponding decrease in population per dermatologist, indicating growth relative to the general population. The proportion of female dermatologists rose by 68.1% during this period, while the male proportion declined by 5.1%. From 2019 to 2022, a significant linear increase (p < 0.001) in URiM representation among dermatology residents was observed, with a model-predicted annual increase of 1.6%. The increasing diversity in dermatology may be attributed to initiatives such as scholarships and mentorship programs implemented by dermatology organizations and residency programs. By fostering a more diverse workforce, dermatology can better address the healthcare needs of a diverse population and promote health equity across all demographics.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Dermatology Research Fellowship Funding.

Dermatology is a competitive field for applicants pursuing a residency, and many applicants turn to dedicated research years to try and increase their competitiveness. Our study aimed to determine the financial costs of a research year and uncover how the costs of a research year vary for different demographic groups. We administered an anonymous survey through various dermatology listservs and social media platforms to prior, current, and future dermatology applicants who had completed a research fellowship during or after medical school. We found the median total fellowship cost ($26,443.20) was higher than the median fellowship income ($23,625.00). Furthermore, we found minority respondents had significantly lower total income, lower fellowship income, and higher net fellowship cost (p<0.05). Ninety participants completed surveys, and over half reported their research year as financially stressful. The majority did state that if given the opportunity, they would choose to do their research year again. Given the overall high costs of research years and the disparity in funding of these years, steps should be taken to address the disparities in fellowship funding or de-emphasize the importance of research fellowships in the dermatology residency selection process.

Enhancing Skin of Color Education in a Dermatology Residency Program through a Journal Club, A Survey Study

Enhancing Skin of Color Education in a Dermatology Residency Program through a Journal Club, A Survey Study

Community Outreach Benefits Dermatology Residents and Their Patients

Community Outreach Benefits Dermatology Residents and Their Patients

[Tanslated article] Burnout Syndrome, Anxiety, and Depression in Dermatology Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and objectiveBurnout syndrome is a mental health disorder due to chronic occupational stress. Both burnout and associated comorbidities are prevalent among health care professionals, being medical residents a vulnerable group. Despite this, the scientific medical literature currently available on this issue in dermatology residents is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of the burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression in dermatology residents, and the associated risk factors. Material and MethodThis was a cross-sectional trial designed to include dermatology residents from Spain (from December 2022 through June 2023). A self-administered form was sent via online messaging applications, including validated scales to study professional quality of life, burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression. ResultsA total of 48 dermatology residents were included in the study, 50% of whom (24/48) were women, with a mean age of 27 years (1.25). A total of 58.33% (28/48) of the residents had some degree of anxiety, 22.9% (11/48) some degree of depression, and 23.4% a moderate risk of burnout (11/48). Workload was the main risk factor associated with the 3 disorders studied, while managerial support or intrinsic motivation seem to play a protective role. ConclusionsBurnout syndrome and its comorbidities are both prevalent in dermatology residents in Spain and closely related to each other.

Outcomes and approaches to program signaling during the 2021-2022 dermatology residency application cycle

Outcomes and approaches to program signaling during the 2021-2022 dermatology residency application cycle

Top DEI Topics to Incorporate Into Dermatology Residency Training: An Electronic Delphi Consensus Study.

Current dermatology residency education may be deficient in curricular topics and training related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Integrating more DEI topics within residency curricula may improve clinical care delivered to diverse populations and improve cultural humility among trainees. The objective of this electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study was to reach a consensus on the most important DEI topics for inclusion in dermatology residency program curricula nationwide. Sixty-one DEI-related topics were proposed by an expert panel consisting of dermatologists from the Association of Professors of Dermatology DEI subcommittee and the American Academy of Dermatology Diversity Task Force. Two rounds of anonymous electronic surveys based on a 5-point Likert scale were administered using a modified e-Delphi design. Voluntary participants including residents and academic dermatologists were self-selected after an email was sent to the Association of Professors of Dermatology listserve.

Sunscreens prescribed to patients with skin of color and/or with melasma: A survey of 221 dermatologists and dermatology residents in Spain.

Dark-skinned individuals (DSI) present high rates of melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The use of sunscreens with mineral filters is essential for prevention and treatment. Our objective was to determine the preferences of dermatologists and dermatology residents in the prescription of sunscreens for DSI. An anonymous survey of attendees at an online photoprotection event held on March 31, 2022, in Spain. The survey was answered by 66.6% (221/332) of the attendees: 159 dermatologists (71.9%) and 62 dermatology residents (28.1%). Respondents reported recommending the use of sunscreen to a median of 80% of DSI [interquartile range (IQR), 50-90]. Physicians reported prescribing tinted sunscreens to a median percentage of 60% (IQR, 25-90) of DSI with acne; and to a median percentage of 90% (IQR, 58-99) of DSI with melasma. The most prescribed photoprotectors to DSI with melasma were organic broad-spectrum sunscreens with antioxidants: 102/220 (46.4%) and mineral broad-spectrum sunscreens (with iron oxides): 45/220 (20.4%). In DSI with melasma or other pigmentary disorders, the most preferred features of sunscreens were as follows: sun protection factor ≥ 30: 217/221 (98.2%), UVA protection: 214/221 (96.8%), color for camouflage: 150/220 (68.2%) and mineral filters such as titanium dioxide and zinc oxide: 151/220 (68.6%) or iron oxides: 131/220 (59.5%). Online survey, potential inclusion bias. Respondents reported to prescribe sunscreens to the majority of DSI, and tinted sunscreens for the majority of DSI with pigmentary disorders. However, the most frequently recommended sunscreens for DSI were organic broad-spectrum sunscreens with antioxidants.

Strategies for overcoming obstacles to hands-on cosmetic and laser training in dermatology residency

Strategies for overcoming obstacles to hands-on cosmetic and laser training in dermatology residency

50170 Cross-Sectional Survey of Hands-on Cosmetic and Laser Training in Dermatology Residency

50170 Cross-Sectional Survey of Hands-on Cosmetic and Laser Training in Dermatology Residency

52380 Collaborative Dermatology Residency Flashcards

52380 Collaborative Dermatology Residency Flashcards

51466 Workforce Analysis of Dermatology Residency Programs within the United States of America

51466 Workforce Analysis of Dermatology Residency Programs within the United States of America