Dermatology Organizations Research Articles

Роль и место медицинской информационной системы при оказании дерматологической помощи в частной медицинской организации

Dermatological diseases retain statistically significant positions in the structure of modern somatic pathology and are often characterized by severe medical and social consequences. The latter include an unreasonably high number of unsatisfactory treatment results, high level of expenses for diagnostics and treatment, low level of patient satisfaction. Taken together, this allows us to consider the comprehensive quality of dermatological care as a whole insufficient. Medical organizations in the private healthcare segment are no exception in this regard. One of the modern effective directions in improving the quality of a wide variety of types of medical care for the population is the widespread use of the so-called medical information systems (MIS). However, at the level of dermatological organizations in the private healthcare segment, this direction has not been practically worked out to date. Purpose of the study: improving the quality of dermatological care for the population in a private medical organization based on the development and implementation of a medical information system. Materials. The study included 2000 dermatological patients of a private medical organization. The control group (1000 people) consisted of patients in the period before the implementation, the main group (1000 people) – patients in the period after the implementation of the developed system. The duration of the compared periods was 2,5 years. Мethods. To obtain the results, the methods of objective examination, specialized patient questionnaires, simple and extended dermatoscopy, content analysis of medical documentation and databases of the medical organization, pharmacoeconomic analysis were used. The system of integrated assessment of the quality of medical care was applied. The methods of variation statistics were used to analyze the results. The exact level of statistical significance of differences in the results before and after the implementation of the developed MIS was calculated.. Subject. The study is at the intersection of two subject areas: «Organization of dermatological care for the population» and «Medical information systems». Results. As part of this study, a MIS was developed aimed at improving the organization of dermatological care for the population. The system was implemented in a medical organization in the private healthcare segment. The main results of such implementation were: an increase in the number of successful treatment results, the level of patient satisfaction with the quality of dermatological care, the level of its standardization, a decrease in direct economic costs for diagnostics and treatment. The integrated and comprehensive indicators of the quality of dermatological care have been increased.. Conclusion. Improving the quality of dermatological care for the population in a medical organization of the private healthcare segment based on the development and implementation of a medical information system has been achieved. The results obtained have a high level of statistical and medical-social significance.

Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview.

Dermatology lags behind other medical specialties in workforce diversity, particularly regarding gender, race, and ethnicity. This study aims to analyze the current demographics of dermatology physicians in the United States, comparing them with other medical specialties, the overall population of practicing U.S. physicians, and the U.S. population as a whole. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the U.S. Census Bureau (2007-2022) were used to evaluate gender, racial, and ethnic diversity within dermatology. Demographic factors analyzed included gender, race, and ethnicity, with racial categories grouped as White, Asian, and underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM). Chi-square tests assessed the fit of gender and age distributions with population proportions, while linear regression models examined trends over time. From 2007 to 2021, the number of dermatologists grew by 22.9%, with a corresponding decrease in population per dermatologist, indicating growth relative to the general population. The proportion of female dermatologists rose by 68.1% during this period, while the male proportion declined by 5.1%. From 2019 to 2022, a significant linear increase (p < 0.001) in URiM representation among dermatology residents was observed, with a model-predicted annual increase of 1.6%. The increasing diversity in dermatology may be attributed to initiatives such as scholarships and mentorship programs implemented by dermatology organizations and residency programs. By fostering a more diverse workforce, dermatology can better address the healthcare needs of a diverse population and promote health equity across all demographics.

Cross-sectional evaluation of Spanish-language resources on websites of US dermatology organizations

Cross-sectional evaluation of Spanish-language resources on websites of US dermatology organizations

Comparison of guidelines for the use of Ustekinumab for psoriasis in the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom: A critical appraisal and comprehensive review.

The aim of this review is to compare and contrast evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from global dermatological organizations for the use of ustekinumab in psoriasis. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Dermatology, National Psoriasis Foundation, British Association of Dermatologists, and European S3 were reviewed and compared. Practice guidelines from the three dermatological organizations are similar with regards to treatment dosage and initiation but differ in their recommendations for baseline screening and interval laboratory monitoring, treatment in patients undergoing surgery or receiving live vaccines, and treatment contraindications. Ustekinumab is an effective and well-tolerated systemic treatment for patients with psoriasis and should be considered in the line of therapy that dermatologists discuss with their patients. Consideration should be given to evidence-based practice guidelines of global dermatology organizations to effectively guide treatment decisions in patients with psoriasis.

Educational and scholarly opportunities for medical students and residents in the United States dermatology societies

Educational and scholarly opportunities for medical students and residents in the United States dermatology societies

The show must go on: Dermatologic procedural education in the era of COVID-19.

COVID-19 procedural restrictions and concerns from both practitioners and patients have led to a decrease in cosmetic procedures performed. Reduced clinic space, the necessity of distancing between people, and patient preference for a smaller care team may restrict trainees from observing, assisting with, or performing procedures. Thus, trainees may be limited in their ability to learn, practice, and meet the required number of cases to achieve competence, subsequently necessitating a sustained demand for alternative methods of learning. In this review, we examine the efforts made thus far by both dermatologists and dermatology organizations to meet the educational procedural needs of trainees and compensate for limitations during the pandemic and highlight areas in which innovation may still be needed.

Skin cancer in skin of color: A cross-sectional study investigating gaps in prevention campaigns on social media

Skin cancer in skin of color: A cross-sectional study investigating gaps in prevention campaigns on social media

Why dermatology is the second least diverse specialty in medicine: How did we get here?

Dermatology is currently the second least diverse medical specialty, after orthopedic surgery, with only a minority of physicians identifying as underrepresented in medicine (UIM). To diversify our specialty, our understanding and recognition of multifactorial barriers to inclusivity such as financial barriers, lack of mentorship, and the implicit bias against minorities UIM is critical. With collaborative efforts by national dermatology organizations, dermatology residency programs, and medical schools to increase the presence of UIM dermatology physicians in the US health care, this important issue continues to receive the attention it deserves.

La dermatologie académique française sur Twitter

Dermatology journals and professional organizations are gradually opening up to social networks. We reviewed the activity of key accounts of dermatology journals and societies on Twitter and compared them specifically to the activity of French accounts. This was an observational study on two given days, December 1, 2018 and May 3, 2019, involving 21 Twitter accounts of journals, of which all 17 were in dermatology, and 19 accounts of professional dermatology organizations, including 5 French accounts. The following data was collected: number of subscriptions, number of subscribers, total number of tweets, number of monthly tweets, and account activity (number of "likes", percentage of increase in subscribers and messages between the two studied periods). For the journals, we collected the 2017 Journal Impact Factor (WebofScience). The most popular dermatology journals on Twitter were JAMADermatology, JAAD and the BritishJournalofDermatology. There was a positive correlation between the impact factor and the number of subscribers (P=0.009, Pearson 0.714) and the number of tweets (P=0.001, Pearson 0.815), as well as a correlation between the number of subscribers and the number of tweets (P<0.001, Pearson 0.828). The American Dermatology Association, with two accounts, had 21,800 subscribers and 9814 subscribers. The Spanish Dermatology Association was second (6124 subscribers), ahead of the British (4833 subscribers). For France, the account with the most subscribers was that of the Union of Dermatologists-Venereologists (952 subscribers). The French Society of Dermatology had a modest 163 subscribers but was active, with a 47% increase in the number of tweets and a 49.5% increase in the number of subscribers. We found a positive correlation between the number of subscribers and the total number of tweets (P=0.006, Pearson 0.602) as well as the number of "likes" (P=0.02, Pearson 0.530). There was a correlation between the number of tweets and the number of "likes" (P<0.001, Pearson=0.897). There are many benefits for journals and professional associations in being present on social networks. However, we feel that there is striking under-use by French dermatology, as evidenced in the example of Twitter.

What Is the Risk of Harm Associated With Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors?

The topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus (Protopic) and pimecrolimus (Elidel), were approved in the early 2000s and were widely used as a nonsteroid treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) in adult and pediatric populations. In 2005, the addition of a boxed warning was mandated for TCIs based on a potential risk of malignancy, and there was subsequently a substantial decline in their use. Since then, evidence has mounted to support the safety of this class of medications and suggests that the increased risk of malignancy remains theoretical. This review aims to dispel some of the common myths surrounding the safety of TCIs by evaluating the key evidence regarding their safety and tolerability in adult and pediatric populations. Four major themes are addressed in a practical question-and-answer format: the risk of harm associated with TCIs including common and serious adverse events; warnings and precautions for their use including the risk of systemic absorption, immunosuppression, and malignancy; the comparative safety of TCIs; and suggestions for counselling patients about the risk of harm with TCIs. Based on the available evidence, international professional dermatological organizations and regulatory authorities have concluded that the benefits of TCIs outweigh their potential risks when used in the appropriate patient populations for the recommended duration of time.

186 Factors causing lack of diversity in dermatology residency programs: Medical students’ perspectives

The lack of racial and ethnic diversity that exists in the field of dermatology is gaining attention amongst influential dermatologic organizations and patients. Approximately 3% of dermatologists in the United States are black, and 4.2% are Hispanic, compared with 12.8% and 16.3%, respectively, of the total population. Gaining a student perspective may help residency programs determine what drives medical students specialty choices. Surveys were distributed to medical students nationally. Responses were analyzed using multivariable logistical regression to identify significant differences between students of different sexes, specialty preference, and underrepresented minority status. 176 surveys have been completed (n=176; 127 women). 24% of students identified as underrepresented minorities (URMs) per AAMC guidelines. 10% of students reported interest in dermatology. Students interested in dermatology were more likely than their peers to place high importance on work life balance (p=.009) and earning potential (p=.047), were more likely to have their specialty choice be influenced by their Step 1 score (p<.0001), were more likely to have exposure to dermatology (p<.0001), and were more likely to have been interested in dermatology prior to entering medical school (p<.0001). URMs were more likely to be deterred from pursuing a specialty based on amount of expected research (p=.037) and were more likely to have been exposed to dermatology than other students (p=.013). Interim analysis demonstrates exposure to dermatology and interest in dermatology prior to medical school are correlated with a current interest in dermatology. While responses show URMs are more likely to have exposure to clinical dermatology, further increasing early exposure may be key to increasing URM interest in the field. The heavy emphasis on research in dermatology may also represent a deterrent to URM applicants.

The Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Non-Sense: Cross-Sectional Study on the Quality of Psoriasis-Related Videos on YouTube and Their Reception by Health Seekers.

BackgroundApproximately 80% of internet users access health information online and patients with chronic illnesses especially rely on internet-based resources. YouTube ranks second among the most accessed websites worldwide and hosts an increasing number of videos with medical information. However, their quality is sometimes unscientific, misleading, or even harmful.ObjectiveAs little is known about YouTube as a source of information on psoriasis, we aimed to investigate the quality of psoriasis-related videos and, if necessary, point out strategies for their improvement.MethodsThe quality of the 100 most viewed psoriasis-related videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) by categorizing the videos into useful, misleading, and dangerous and by evaluating the reception of the videos by users.ResultsEvaluation of the videos exhibited a total of 117,221,391 views and a total duration of 10:28 hour. The majority of clips contained anecdotal personal experiences with complementary and alternative psoriasis treatments, topical treatments, and nutrition and diets being the most frequently addressed topics. While advertisements accounted for 26.0% (26/100) of the videos, evidence-based health information amounted to only 20.0% (20/100); 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 52.0% (52/100) as misleading, and 11.0% (11/100) as even dangerous. The quality of the videos evaluated by DISCERN and GQS was generally low (1.87 and 1.95, respectively, on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being the maximum). Moreover, we found that viewers rated poor-quality videos better than higher quality videos.ConclusionsOur in-depth study demonstrates that nearly two-thirds of the psoriasis-related videos we analyzed disseminate misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective anecdotal and unscientific content is disproportionately overrepresented and poor-quality videos are predominantly rated positively by users, while higher quality video clips receive less positive ratings. Strategies by professional dermatological organizations are urgently needed to improve the quality of information on psoriasis on YouTube and other social media.

Overview of high-risk Food and Drug Administration recalls for cosmetics and personal care products from 2002 to 2016.

There have been several recent controversies surrounding cosmetic products that have impacted health. Dermatologists are often the first to encounter these issues, and recalls are one metric of a safety profile of cosmetics and their impact on health. To analyze all recalls of cosmetic and personal care products from 2002 to 2016. This observational study describes all FDA cosmetic and personal care product recalls, acquired via a Freedom of Information Act request, from 2002 to 2016. The total number of Class I, Class II, and Class III recalls, number and origin of manufacturers, number of products affected, and main reason for recall were collected. A total of 14 Class I, 266 Class II, and 33 Class III recalls were recorded. Baby products comprised the largest product category accounting for 24% of all recalls (76/313). 76% of recalls were due to bacterial contamination (237/313), followed by unapproved components, labeling issues, and skin irritation. The 14 Class I recalls accounted for 1.9 million products in distribution. Cosmetic recalls impacted millions of products and had the potential to cause serious harm. Dermatologists have the ability to strengthen public safety by reporting adverse events, encouraging recalls of harmful products, and lobbying through dermatology organizations for meaningful change to current cosmetic regulation.

Travel as a teaching and learning tool

Throughout history, physicians have traveled extensively to acquire new knowledge or to learn the latest therapeutic techniques from colleagues and academicians. This “wanderlust” persists in many who want to understand the world around them and learn from others, physicians or nonphysicians. Before the era of instantaneous online telecommunication, dermatologists would enhance their education by traveling abroad to learn from world-renowned experts in Europe and elsewhere and return with a treasure trove of knowledge and new skills. With the Internet, webinars, and teledermatology, the attraction for travel has diminished, mainly due to our ever-increasing demanding world of obligations; however, face-to-face interaction with colleagues of a different culture and educational background still has an inexorable educational value. To facilitate such endeavors, many insightful educators have taken the opportunity to establish several international societies and academies, where on-site educational activities can take place. Currently, a few of the more active and popular dermatologic organizations that are conducting meetings around the world are the International League of Dermatologic Societies; International Society of Dermatology; North American Clinical Dermatologic Society; International Society of Dermatologic Surgery; International Academy of Cosmetic Dermatology; and European Society of Cosmetic and Aesthetic Dermatology, all of which exemplify “travel as a teaching tool.”

Practice Patterns and Job Satisfaction of Mohs Surgeons.

There is a paucity of data on Mohs surgery workforce patterns. To identify if gender differences exist in practice patterns of Mohs surgeons, factors that influence these differences, and factors influencing job satisfaction among Mohs surgeons. An electronic survey was distributed to dermatology organizations targeting members of the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS), from October 2015 to April 2016. Two hundred twenty-seven ACMS members responded; 37% were women. Twenty-five percent of women and 19% of men work part time. Thirty-seven percent of women practice in academia versus 22% of men. Forty-three percent of women and 23% of men identified children as a factor affecting their ability to work full time. Gender comparisons for current job satisfaction show 57% of men and 35% of women being very satisfied. Supervision/feedback/recognition adds to satisfaction at a higher rate for women (53%) than for men (29%). For both genders combined, work content, patient base, and autonomy had the highest average job satisfaction ratings. Gender differences exist in practice patterns and job satisfaction of Mohs surgeons. This study demonstrates factors that could influence job satisfaction among female Mohs surgeons-knowledge that is important to individuals who lead, mentor, or supervise female Mohs surgeons.

An updated assessment of social media usage by dermatology journals and organizations

Despite the increasing prevalence of social media usage, the activity of dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered organizations on top social media platforms has not been investigated since 2012. We investigated a total of 124 dermatology journals, 242 professional organizations, and 78 patient-centered organizations to assess their presence and popularity on social media. Searches were conducted to identify journals and organizations on Facebook and Twitter. Similar searches were done for organizations on LinkedIn. The number of Facebook likes, Twitter followers, and LinkedIn followers of the dermatological entities were quantified. There were 22 (17.7%) dermatology journals active on Facebook and 21 (16.9%) on Twitter. Amongst the professional organizations, 114 (47.1%) were on Facebook, 69 (28.5%) on Twitter, and 50 (20.7%) on LinkedIn. In comparison, 68 (87.2%) patient-centered organizations were on Facebook, 56 (71.8%) on Twitter, and 56 (71.8%) on LinkedIn. Our results demonstrate that the popularity of dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered organizations on top social networking sites has grown markedly since 2012. Although the number of dermatology journals on social media has increased since 2012, their presence continues to trail behind professional and patient-centered dermatological organizations, suggesting underutilization of a valuable resource.

Lab to Smartphone

Welcome to the first column of “Lab to Smartphone,” a new and regular feature of JAACAP Connect that is devoted to educating and engaging our child psychiatry community on practical, contemporary, and controversial topics that are on the minds of both child psychiatrists and the greater public at large. Let’s face it: child psychiatry is poorly understood and often profoundly misrepresented in the media. While I could be wrong about this, my sense is that the annual meetings of, say, dermatology organizations generally don’t attract nearly the number of protesters that we do. And though it certainly is true that our profession has made some missteps along the way, much of this antagonism comes from our allowing of other groups to define us.

Dermatology on Snapchat

Launched in 2011, Snapchat is one of the newest social media platforms with over 158 million active daily users. This study investigated the presence of dermatology-related content on Snapchat. We searched for Snapchat accounts for the top ten most popular dermatology journals, professional dermatological organizations, and dermatology-related patient advocate groups on social media. None of the above-mentioned entities were found on Snapchat. Plastic surgeons were found to primarily utilize the application, although one prominent dermatologist was also found. It was theorized that the brevity of the "snaps" was a contributing factor for dermatological organizations to not use the application. However, Snapchat in the right practice setting may be useful for dermatologists, not only to educate followers, but also as a marketing tool to Millennials.

Mohs appropriate use criteria: retrospectively applied to nonmelanoma skin cancers at a single academic center.

In September 2012, appropriate use criteria (AUC) for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) were released by a collaboration of dermatology organizations including the American College of Mohs Surgery. The group sought to determine adherence to the Mohs AUC at the academic institution. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) treated within the University of Utah, Department of Dermatology, from January through March of 2012. They applied the Mohs AUC to analyze these cases. In total, the authors identified 724 patients and 1,026 cases of NMSCs, including 557 (54.3%) basal cell carcinomas and 469 (45.7%) squamous cell carcinomas. Of the 1,026 NMSCs, 350 (34.1%) were treated with MMS. Of these cases treated with MMS, there were 339 cases (96.9%) deemed appropriate, 4 (1.1%) uncertain, and 7 (2.0%) inappropriate per AUC. Also examined were 611 cases treated with modalities other than MMS, of which 60.7% would have met AUC for MMS. In a 3-month review of all NMSC cases at the academic center, there is a low percentage of cases performed that are inappropriate for MMS by AUC. At the institution, there is a large percentage of NMSC that meet AUC but are treated by other modalities. The use is highly appropriate for MMS, and these data suggest possible underutilization of MMS for certain NMSCs. Further studies are required to determine the effectiveness of other treatment modalities for NMSC that meet Mohs AUC.

Social Networking Sites

The use of social media by dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered dermatology organizations remains largely unknown and, to our knowledge, has yet to be fully evaluated. To evaluate and quantify the extent of involvement of dermatology journals, professional dermatology organizations, and dermatology-related patient advocate groups on social networking sites. We obtained an archived list of 102 current dermatology journals from SCImago on the World Wide Web and used the list to investigate Facebook, Twitter, and individual journal websites for the presence of social media accounts. We identified professional and patient-centered dermatology organization activity on social networks through queries of predetermined search terms on Google, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. The activity of each entity was documented by recording the following metrics of popularity: the numbers of Facebook "likes," Twitter "followers," and LinkedIn "members." The numbers of Facebook likes, Twitter followers, and LinkedIn members corresponding to each dermatology journal and each professional and patient-related dermatology organization. On July 17, 2012, of the 102 dermatology journals ranked by SCImago, 12.7% were present on Facebook and 13.7% on Twitter. We identified popular dermatology journals based on Facebook likes and Twitter followers, led by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respectively. Popular professional dermatology organizations included dermRounds Dermatology Network (11 251 likes on Facebook and 2900 followers on Twitter). The most popular dermatology patient-centered organizations were the Skin Cancer Foundation (20 119 likes on Facebook), DermaTalk (21 542 followers on Twitter), and the National Psoriasis Foundation (200 members on LinkedIn). Patient-centered and professional dermatology organizations use social networking sites; however, academic journals tend to lag behind significantly. Although some journals are active in social media, most have yet to recognize the potential benefits of fully embracing popular social networks.