Depth Of Invasion Measurement Research Articles

Variability in Depth of Invasion Measurements in Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity and the Effect on Pathologic Tumor Staging.

Depth of invasion (DOI) was added to the staging criteria for carcinoma of the lip and oral cavity in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (AJCC8). However, there are multiple practical challenges to obtaining an accurate DOI measurement with limited data regarding interobserver variability in DOI measurement. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver variability in DOI measurement and its effect on tumor stage. We performed an electronic medical record search for excisions of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity between January 1, 2010 and December 25, 2017. All slides containing significant tumor were selected for independent blinded DOI measurement by four head and neck pathologists per AJCC8 guidelines. Pathologic stage was assigned in conjunction with reported tumor greatest dimension. Observers recorded the slide used for measurement and potential issues limiting assessment of DOI. Results were compared for reproducibility in DOI and tumor stage using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. A total of 167 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma with available slides were included. The ICC score for DOI between observers was 0.91339 (> 0.9 considered excellent). Only 7.2% of cases had uniform DOI amongst observers. Increasing overall tumor size and average DOI correlated with increasing range in DOI amongst observers. Differences in DOI resulted in differences in pathologic tumor staging (pT) for 15% of tumors. Use of different slides for DOI measurements was significantly associated with different pT staging. In contrast, ulceration and exophytic growth did not correlate with higher DOI or pT variability. Despite the excellent ICC score, differences in DOI measurement resulted in variable pT staging for a considerable number of cases. We therefore recommend consensus for DOI in at least some cases in which potential differences in DOI could alter pT stage assignment.

Clinicopathological features of stratified mucin-producing neoplastic lesions of the cervix

Objective: To investigatethe clinicopathological features of stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE) and invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (ISMC) of the cervix with review of the literature. Methods: Sixteen patients with SMILE/ISMC components of the cervix were collected from files in the Department of Pathology at Xijing Hospital from January 2007 to March 2019. Clinicopathological data included age at diagnosis, clinical presentation, histological type, depth of invasion measurement, the status of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis, FIGO staging and follow-up. Histochemistry AB and PAS-D staining and immunostaining for cytokeratin (CK) 7, p16, p63, p40, PAX8, MUC6, p53 were performed simultaneously. In addition, twelve cases with invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma were evaluated using three-tiered pattern-based system (also called Pattern Classification). Results: The average age at diagnosis for patients was 49.7 years (range, 33 to 65 years), and vaginal bleeding occurred in the majority of cases (13/16). The characteristic morphology of SMILE and ISMC was present as non-invasive and invasive stratified epithelium that the full-thickness cells contained different amount of cytoplasmic mucin, respectively. Five cases of SMILE coexisted with adenocarcinoma in situ (1 case), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (1 case), and invasive adenocarcinoma (3 cases). Thirteen cases with ISMC components included pure ISMC (3 cases), mixed with usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (8 cases) or squamous cell carcinoma (2 cases). All pure ISMC had lymph vascular space invasion and depth of invasion exceeded 10 mm. All eleven cases of invasive adenocarcinoma with ISMC components belonged to Pattern C tumors, which typically showed diffusely destructive stromal invasion, solid or poorly differentiated components. The results of histochemical staining confirmed that SMILE/ISMC cells were rich in acidic and neutral mucin. The immunohistochemical staining for CK7 and p16 was diffusely strong positive in SMILE (4/4) and ISMC (8/8) components. The positive expressions of p63 and p40 was located in peripheral cells of stratified epithelial nests or merely in a few cells of SMILE (1/3) and ISMC (2/8) components. In ISMC tissues, there were partial expression of MUC6 (5/7), focal expression of PAX8 (2/8), and wild-type expression pattern (4/10) or completely negative expression (6/10) of p53 protein. All thirteen patients with follow-up data were alive (mean 50.5 months, range 4 to 140). Conclusions: As new tumor entities, SMILE is a rare and unique endocervical intraepithelial lesion, while ISMC belongs to an invasive leison. Given that the tumors with ISMC components may have aggressive behavior, it is important for clinicians and pathologists to fully understand the clinicopathological features of SMILE and ISMC.

Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists

AbstractA pattern-based classification for invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma has been proposed as predictive of the risk of nodal metastases. We aimed to determine the reproducibility of such classification in the context of common diagnostic challenges: distinction between in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma and depth of invasion measurement. Nine gynecologic pathologists independently reviewed 96 cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma (two slides per case). They diagnosed each case as in situ or invasive carcinoma classifying the latter following the pattern-based classification as pattern A (non-destructive), B (focally destructive) or C (diffusely destructive). Depth of invasion, when applicable, was measured (mm). Overall, diagnostic reproducibility of pattern diagnosis was good (κ=0.65). Perfect agreement (9/9 reviewers) was seen in only 11 cases (11%), all destructively invasive (10 pattern C and 1 pattern B). In all, ≥5/9 reviewer concordance was achieved in 82/96 cases (85%). Distinction between in situ and invasive carcinoma, regardless of the pattern, showed only slight agreement (κ=0.37). Likewise, distinction restricted to in situ versus pattern A was poor (κ=0.23). Distinction between non-destructive (in situ+pattern A) and destructive (patterns B+C) carcinoma showed significantly higher agreement (κ=0.62). Estimation of depth of invasion showed excellent reproducibility (ICC=0.82). However, different measurements resulting in differing FIGO stages were common (from at least 1 reviewer in 79% cases). On the basis of interobserver agreement, the pattern-based classification is best at diagnosing destructive invasion, which carries a risk for nodal metastases. Agreement in diagnosing in situ versus invasive carcinoma, including pattern A, was poor. Given the nil risk of nodal spread in in situ and pattern A lesions, the term ‘endocervical adenocarcinoma with non-destructive growth' can be considered when the distinction is difficult, after excluding destructive invasion. Depth of invasion measurement was highly reproducible among pathologists; thus, the pattern-based approach can complement, but should not replace, the depth of invasion metric.