The medical management of stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) attempts to both slow the rate of progression towards dialysis and prevent the development of secondary complications associated with worsening uraemia. Clinicians attempt to achieve this by targeting blood pressure, lipids, calciumphosphate imbalance (mineral metabolism) and anaemia. Over the past 20 years, there has been a wealth of publications reporting on the associations between uraemic anaemia and the development of left ventricular dilatation and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) [1–4], reduced quality of life [5,6] and mortality rates [7], both in the CKD non-dialysis and dialysis populations. In the pre-epoetin era, Silberberg reported an association between the degree of anaemia and LVH and differential mortality rates in dialysis patients in the late 1980s [8]. These findings were extended by Foley and Parfrey et al. [9,10] in a number of publications describing the association of anaemia with LVH, congestive heart failure and mortality. Levin et al. [1–3] extended those observations to patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction, demonstrating increasing prevalence of LVH, dilatation and heart failure as kidney function declines. In addition, numerous other authors have described the association of haemoglobin and outcomes in CKD populations, prior to dialysis, on dialysis and even post-transplant [11]. Given the biological plausibility that anaemia impacts cardiac structure and function, and outcomes, as well as large amount of observational data that suggested a ‘cause and effect’ between the presence of uraemic anaemia and cardiomyopathy, a series of interventional trials were undertaken. Commencing in the late 1990s, a range of themes were applied to clinical trials to examine different hypotheses: ‘early’ vs ‘late’ correction of anaemia and ‘lower’ vs ‘higher’ haemoglobin levels in both ‘pre-dialysis’ and ‘dialysis’ populations. Two published trials have examined whether prevention of anaemia could reduce or reverse the development of LVH in the non-dialysis CKD population, maintaining appropriate attention to other modifiable risk factors. Despite maintaining haemoglobin higher than 120 g/l in the active group and allowing for a progressive decline in haemoglobin in the control group (90–100 g/l), there was no statistical difference in the left ventricular mass between the groups after 2 years [12,13]. Of note, both studies found relative stability of haemoglobin in the control group, despite previous observations which would have suggested decline. Within the context of the trial, a number of parameters were attended to: blood pressure control, mineral metabolism balance and iron status. The findings suggest that even at relatively advanced stages of renal dysfunction, multiple clinical parameters within the context of a trial may cancel out the impact of anaemia on LVH. An editorial by Strippoli and Craig [14], of the Cochrane Renal Group, referred to this as a potential example of the Hawthorn effect, where patients in trials tend to do well. Nonetheless, it is important to note that in the observational studies, no treatment interventions were undertaken. The observations were undertaken in an unselected population, either in the pre-epoetin era, or prior to the acceptance of multiple risk factor intervention in CKD. Thus the randomized controlled trials have included a group of patients who are different from those on whom the original observations were made. In this edition of NDT, Macdougall and co-investigators [15] applied a different model to pre-dialysis anaemic patients, whereby the control group’s haemoglobin concentration was allowed to decline to lower levels (90 g/l), but were subsequently rescued to the same haemoglobin concentration as the active group. They too were unable to demonstrate Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Simon D. Roger, MD, FRACP, Department of Renal Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford 2250, Australia. Email: sroger@nsccah.health.nsw.gov.au