SEER, 93, 4, OCTOBER 2015 788 (although Lyons does not use the word) evoke the oft-cited Czech tradition of ‘Švejkism’. Overall, Adjectives of Democracy is a long and slightly uneven work, whose detailed and sometimes highly technical discussions of the statistical testing of public opinion can sit uneasily with broad-brush theoretical discussions of democracy and political behaviour; explorations of the political thought of Rosanvallon and others; and historically-oriented accounts of the Prague Spring. The Czech lands emerge, moreover, as an awkward case for the empirical testing of ideas about democratic indeterminacy in public opinion: ultimately, it is unclear whether the complex patterns of public opinion revealed should be read as an example of the inherent ambiguity of attitudes to democracy in many societies, or seen more narrowly as an account of the (transmuted) legacy of one country’s democratic tradition across different regimes. The richness of the book’s empirical findings and the originality of its Rosanvalloniantakeonpublicopinionresearch,however,morethancompensate for such flaws. Adjectives of Democracy will certainly be an important point of reference both for researchers concerned with the development of democracy in the Czech case and those seeking to ask more searching questions of the longerterm evolution of public opinion in East and Central Europe. UCL SSEES Seán Hanley Bieber, Florian; Galijaš, Armina and Archer, Rory (eds). Debating the End of Yugoslavia.SoutheastEuropeanStudies.Ashgate,FarnhamandBurlington, VT, 2014. xiii + 261 pp. Illustration. Notes. Bibliographies. Index. £65.00. Nationalism enjoys growing appeal in the present European timeframe. Post-nationalist formations like the European Union are being thrown onto the defensive as a result. Perhaps it is the apt moment for the appearance of a book exploring how academic scholarship has treated the dissolution of another experimental post-national entity, Yugoslavia, and subsequent wars in many of its constituent parts. In a short but incisive chapter, Eric Gordy indicates that since 1991 researchers have ‘concentrated overwhelmingly on the top level of institutions, especially political and military’ (p. 11). Elsewhere in this volume, there are at least two chapters in this tradition, a reassessment of Miloşević as a ‘saviour’ of the Communist regime and the attitude of Serbian political elites to the VanceOwen Peace Plan. Such studies are justified because, as Gordy himself is the first to admit: ‘the failure of the Yugoslav state was a massive failure of institutions at many levels and the violence that accompanied the failure was organized […] through institutions’ (p. 11). REVIEWS 789 But a number of authors contend that there is insufficient understanding of socialchangeandthewaysinwhichitcontributedtopoliticalandsocialdivisions. Rory Archer seeks to revive interest in the impact of social class on the microexperiences of war. He believes that phenomena like ‘eliticide’ in Bosnia and the impoverishment of the middle classes, have been explored but not sufficiently in relation to class structures. Armina Galijaš, for her part, makes a case for the study of everyday lives, Lebenswelt, or everyday structures, attitudes, codes and norms of life. The rapid development of rent-seeking and formation of criminal elites and their consolidation in the upheavals of the 1990s is a neglected area crying out for research (however exacting that might prove to be). Gordy believes that there are models available from Russia and Sicily which help to shed light on the uglier features of political and social change in post-1989 Southeast Europe. This timely-collection of good-quality essays on the state of scholarship in the post-Yugoslav sphere finds that too much of the scholarship is characterized by methodological shortcomings. Josip Glaurdić homes in on plentiful leftist critiques of international policies towards Yugoslavia and its successor states. He find that much of this ’scholarly work’ is characterized by ‘source selection bias, distortions of the record of events, and serious mistreatment of historical evidence’ (p. 26). Crude imperialist stereotypes were used to perpetuate hostility towards the role of assertive German diplomacy during the initial stage of the break-up of Yugoslavia. He finds that even the most cited scholarly book on the dissolution of Yugoslavia managed to display a high level of factual imprecision concerning key events. Glaurdic also pleads for care in assessing the body of work of The Hague Tribunal (ICTY). He points out that...
Read full abstract