Delta-crystallin Gene Research Articles

Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor-1 and Nuclear Factor κB Are Crucial Survival Signals That Regulate Caspase-3-mediated Lens Epithelial Cell Differentiation Initiation

It is now known that the function of the caspase family of proteases is not restricted to effectors of programmed cell death. For example, there is a significant non-apoptotic role for caspase-3 in cell differentiation. Our own studies in the developing lens show that caspase-3 is activated downstream of the canonical mitochondrial death pathway to act as a molecular switch in signaling lens cell differentiation. Importantly, for this function, caspase-3 is activated at levels far below those that induce apoptosis. We now have provided evidence that regulation of caspase-3 for its role in differentiation induction is dependent on the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) survival-signaling pathway. IGF-1R executed this regulation of caspase-3 by controlling the expression of molecules in the Bcl-2 and inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) families. This effect of IGF-1R was mediated through NFκB, demonstrated here to function as a crucial downstream effector of IGF-1R. Inhibition of expression or activation of NFκB blocked expression of survival proteins in the Bcl-2 and IAP families and removed controls on the activation state of caspase-3. The high level of caspase-3 activation that resulted from inhibiting this IGF-1R/NFκB signaling pathway redirected cell fate from differentiation toward apoptosis. These results provided the first evidence that the IGF-1R/NFκB cell survival signal is a crucial regulator of the level of caspase-3 activation for its non-apoptotic function in signaling cell differentiation.

Chick δ1-Crystallin Enhancer Influences Mouse αA-Crystallin Promoter Activity in Transgenic Mice

Both the -366/+43 and the -282/+43 mouse alphaA-crystallin (or alphaA) promoters have been effective at driving transgene expression in lens fiber cells, but not in lens epithelium. Because the chick delta1-crystallin gene is expressed in lens epithelial cells, an enhancer was borrowed from this gene and linked to the alphaA promoter. This heterogenic enhancer/promoter construct was tested in transgenic mice to see whether it was active in both lens epithelium and fiber cells while retaining lens specificity. The third intron of the chick delta1-crystallin gene, which contains a lens enhancer element, was added to the 5' end of the mouse alphaA promoter. We refer to this chimeric regulatory element as the deltaenalphaA promoter. To test its activity, we inserted coding sequences for five different genes. Transgenic mice were generated by pronuclear microinjection. Transgene expression patterns were analyzed by either X-gal staining, in situ hybridization or immunohistochemical staining. When deltaenalphaA-lacZ transgenic embryos were stained with X-gal at embryonic day (E)11.5, beta-galactosidase activity was detected only in the eye. Histologic sections of the stained embryos revealed that lacZ was expressed exclusively in the lens, in both epithelial and fiber cells. Transgenic mice were also generated using either the original alphaA- or the new deltaenalphaA promoter linked to an insulin cDNA. In situ hybridizations confirmed that the short alphaA promoter targeted prenatal insulin expression specifically to the lens fiber cells, whereas the deltaenalphaA promoter was active in both lens epithelial and fiber cells. Developmental studies of the deltaenalphaA-insulin mice showed that the deltaenalphaA promoter became active at the lens pit stage and remained active in all lens cells, even at postnatal ages. The deltaenalphaA promoter also successfully directed expression of SV40 T-antigen (TAg), human E2F2, and dominant negative Sprouty2 (dn-Spry2) genes to lens epithelial and fiber cells. The lens specificity of the deltaenalphaA promoter was maintained in minigenes with different types of introns and polyadenylation signals. A new lens-specific regulatory element was generated-the deltaenalphaA promoter, which can drive high levels of transgene expression in both lens epithelium and fiber cells throughout development. This modified promoter can be used for future transgenic studies of signal transduction and cell cycle regulation in lens epithelial cells.

Interplay of Pax6 and SOX2 in lens development as a paradigm of genetic switch mechanisms for cell differentiation

When the cloning era arrived, our first target for cloning was the delta1-crystallin gene of the chicken, the lens-specific gene expressed earliest following lens induction. We have investigated the regulation of this gene with the idea that the mechanism of its activation must reflect that of lens differentiation per se. We here summarize the investigation carried out in our group along this line over the past 20 years. The delta1-crystallin gene is regulated by an enhancer in the third intron, and the specificity of this regulation is governed by a DNA region (called DC5) of only 30 bp DNA bound by two transcription factors. These factors have been identified as SOX1/2/3 (Group B1 SOX proteins, SOX2 being the major player) and Pax6, and have been shown to bind cooperatively to DC5 and form a ternary complex having a robust potency for transcriptional activation. In the embryo, Pax6 is widely expressed in the head ectoderm before the lens is formed, and as the optic vesicle comes into contact with the ectoderm, SOX2/3 expression is induced in the contacted area of the ectoderm, thereby allowing Pax6 and SOX2/3 to meet in the same cell nucleus, where they can then activate a battery of genes for early lens development including delta1-crystallin. Thus, the cooperative action of Pax6 and SOX2 initiates lens differentiation. More broadly, SOX1/2/3 interact with various partner transcription factors, and participate in defining distinct cell states that depend on the partner factors: Pax6 for lens differentiation, Oct3/4 for establishing the epiblast/ES cell state, and Brn2 for the neural primordia. Thus, the regulation of SOX2 (and SOX1/3) and its partner factors, exemplified by Pax6, determines the spatio-temporal order of the occurrence of cell differentiation.

Characterization of the chicken L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf in crystallin gene regulation and lens differentiation.

Members of the Maf family, including L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf, are "basic region/leucine zipper" (bZIP) transcription factors. Maf proteins contain a highly conserved acidic transactivation domain (AD), and a bZIP region that mediates DNA-binding activity. The hinge region between AD and bZIP varies considerably in length between different proteins. Recent studies reveal that L-Maf, c-Maf and MafB play key roles in vertebrate lens development. We investigated the transactivation activity of individual factors in culture cells to analyse their specific functions. In transient transfection assays with a reporter gene containing Maf responsive elements, MafB and c-Maf activated higher levels of the reporter gene than L-Maf. However, L-Maf transactivated the alphaA-crystallin promoter as effectively as MafB and c-Maf, and induced the expression of the endogenous delta-crystallin gene more efficiently than the other two proteins. Domain-swapping experiments reveal that the bZIP region of MafB takes part in strong transcriptional activity, while the acidic and hinge regions (AH) of c-Maf collectively serve as a strong transactivation domain. The AH region of L-Maf (but not c-Maf) conferred transactivation activity to induce delta-crystallin gene expression. These results suggest that despite their similar DNA binding properties, L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf regulate different sets of target genes by complex interactions with multiple factors that recognize cis-elements in promoters. The AH region of L-Maf has a distinct role in inducing endogenous delta-crystallin gene.

Reliability of delta-crystallin as a marker for studies of chick lens induction

Induction of a lens by the optic vesicle of the brain was the first demonstration of how tissue interactions could influence cell fate during development. However, recent work with amphibians has shown that the optic vesicle is not the primary inducer of lens formation. Rather, an earlier interaction between anterior neural plate and presumptive lens ectoderm appears to direct lens formation. One problem with many early experiments was the absence of an unambiguous assay for lens formation. Before being able to test whether the revised model of lens induction applies to chicken embryos, we examined the suitability of using delta-crystallin as a marker of lens formation. Although delta-crystallin is the major protein synthesized in the chick lens, one or both of the two delta-crystallin genes found in chickens is transcribed in many non-lens tissues as well. In studies of lens formation where appearance of the delta-crystallin protein is used as a positive assay, synthesis of delta-crystallin outside of the lens could make experiments difficult to interpret. Therefore, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence were used to determine whether the delta-crystallin messenger RNA detected in non-lens tissues is translated into protein, as it is in the lens. On Coomassie-blue-stained gels of several tissues from stage-22 embryos, a prominent protein was observed that co-migrated with delta-crystallin. However, on immunoblots, none of the non-lens tissues tested contained detectable levels of delta-crystallin at this stage. By imunofluorescence, delta-crystallin was observed in Rathke's pouch and in a large area of oral ectoderm near Rathke's pouch, yet none of the cells in these non-lens tissues showed the typical elongated morphology of lens fiber cells. When presumptive lens ectoderm or other regions of ectoderm from stage-10 embryos were cultured and tested for lens differentiation, both cell elongation and delta-crystallin synthesis were observed, or neither were observed. The results suggest that delta-crystallin synthesis and cell elongation together serve as useful criteria for assessing a positive lens response.

Lens-preferred activity of chicken delta 1- and delta 2-crystallin enhancers in transgenic mice and evidence for retinoic acid-responsive regulation of the delta 1-crystallin gene.

There are two tandemly linked delta-crystallin genes [5' delta 1 -delta 2 3'] in the chicken, with the delta 1-crystallin gene being expressed much more highly (50-100-fold) in the embryonic lens than the delta 2-crystallin gene. Previous transfection experiments have shown that a lens-preferred enhancer exists in the third intron of each chicken delta-crystallin gene. In the present investigation we have used transgenic mice to establish that both the chicken delta 1- and delta 2-crystallin enhancers are preferentially active in the mouse lens in combination with their homologous promoter and the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. The promoter/ CAT constructs lacking the enhancers were inactive in the transgenic mice. In one case, a truncated delta 2-crystallin promoter (-308/+24) in combination with the enhancer was also active in the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum of the transgenic mice, which could prove useful in future experiments. Finally, retinoic acid receptors (RAR beta) activated the delta 1-crystallin, but not the delta 2-crystallin enhancer in teh recombinant plasmids in cotransfected embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells treated with retinoic acid. This activation did not occur when using the care enhancer (fragment B4) lacking surrounding flanking sequences (fragment B3 and B5) of the enhancer. Together these experiments show that the chicken delta-crystallin enhancers show lens-preference in transgenic mice despite the absence of delta-crystallin in this species and add retinoic acid nuclear receptors to the growing list of transcription factors (including Pax-6, Sox-2, and delta EF3) that directly or indirectly contribute to the high expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene in the lens.

DNA binding through distinct domains of zinc-finger-homeodomain protein AREB6 has different effects on gene transcription.

Transcription factor AREB6 has a unique structure composed of two zinc-finger clusters in N- and C-terminal regions, and one homeodomain in the middle. AREB6 has been known to regulate the expression of the Na, K-ATPase alpha 1 subunit, interleukin 2 and delta-crystallin genes. We determined the optimal binding sites for the N-terminal zinc-finger cluster as GTCACCTGT or TGCACCTGT and for the C-terminal zinc-finger cluster as C/TACCTG/TT by the CASTing method (cyclic amplification and selection of targets). The additional consensus sequence GTTTC/G, in conjunction with the CACCTGT sequence, was selected by the second CASTing for the entire coding region. The N-terminal zinc-finger cluster binds to DNA strongly when the DNA has GTTTC/G in conjunction with the CACCTGT sequence. The homeodomain had no specific DNA binding activity but was found to interact with the N-terminal zinc-finger cluster. Analyses of zinc-finger mutation proteins revealed that the contribution to DNA binding of each N-terminal zinc-finger motif is altered depending on the presence of the additional consensus. Transient transfection assays showed that AREB6 repressed the human 70-kDa heat-shock gene promoter harboring the CACCTGT sequence together with the additional consensus, and that AREB6 activated the promoter harboring the CACCTGT sequence without the additional consensus. These results suggest that AREB6 has multiple conformational states, leading to positive and negative regulations of gene transcription.

Exploring the role of histidines in the catalytic activity of duck δ-Crystallins using site-directed mutagenesis

The duck delta 2-crystallin gene encodes an enzymatically-active argininosuccinate lyase while the delta 1-crystallin gene product, although 94% identical, is enzymatically inactive. Four histidine residues in the duck delta 2-crystallin. His91, His110, His162 and His178, were converted to asparagine residues in an effort to define the role of histidines in the catalytic process of this enzyme-crystallin and to explain the lack of enzyme activity in the delta 1-crystallin protein. The recombinant mutant proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity for analysis. These four residues were chosen because they fall within highly conserved regions of argininosuccinate lyases from several species. This analysis revealed that change of His91 or His162 for asparagine resulted in complete loss of activity. The His110 enzyme had a reduced Vmax and the His178 enzyme was near normal in its kinetic properties. These data confirm the roles of histidine in the catalytic process of this enzyme-crystallin and suggest that the change of His91 to Gln91 observed in the duck and chicken delta 1-crystallin molecules may be sufficient to account for the lack of enzymatic activity of those proteins.

Involvement of SOX proteins in lens-specific activation of crystallin genes.

We have studied the mechanism of delta 1-crystallin gene activation, which occurs early in lens cell differentiation, and have previously shown that an essential element of the delta 1-crystallin enhancer is bound by a group of nuclear factors, delta EF2, among which delta EF2a is highly enriched in lens cells. In this report we show that the cDNA of delta EF2a codes for the chicken SOX-2 protein (cSOX-2), which is structurally related to the sex-determining factor SRY. Sox-2 is expressed at high levels in the early developing lens in both chicken and mouse embryos. Overexpression of delta EF2a/cSOX-2 increased delta 1-crystallin enhancer activity to a plateau in lens cells, but not in fibroblasts, consistent with the previously drawn conclusion that delta EF2a activates transcription only in concert with another factor present in the lens. This result supports the model that SOX proteins act as architectural components in the activating complex formed on an enhancer, as indicated for another HMG domain protein, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF-1). We also show that SOX protein binding is essential for lens-specific promoter activity of the mouse gamma F-crystallin gene. This work is the first to show delta- and gamma-crystallin genes as examples of direct regulatory targets of SOX proteins and provides evidence that diversified crystallin genes are regulated, at least partly, by a common mechanism.

Pax-6 and lens-specific transcription of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene.

The abundance of delta-crystallin in the chicken eye lens provides an advantageous marker for tissue-specific gene expression during cellular differentiation. The lens-specific expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene is governed by an enhancer in the third intron, which binds a positive (delta EF2) and negative (delta EF1) factor in its core region. Here we show by DNase I footprinting, electrophoretic mobility-shift assays, and cotransfection experiments with the delta 1-promoter/enhancer fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene that the delta 1-crystallin enhancer has two adjacent functional Pax-6 binding sites. We also demonstrate by DNase I footprinting that the delta EF1 site can bind the transcription factor USF, raising the possibility that USF may cooperate with Pax-6 in activation of the chicken delta 1- and alpha A-crystallin genes. These data, coupled with our recent demonstration that Pax-6 activates the alpha A-crystallin gene, suggest that Pax-6 may have been used extensively throughout evolution to recruit and express crystallin genes in the lens.

Lens-specific activity of the chicken delta 1-crystallin enhancer in the mouse.

A lens-specific enhancer was identified in the third intron of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene by analysis based on transient transfection of primary-cultured cells. To assess the significance of this enhancer's activity in embryonic lens cells during development, tkCAT gene carrying the enhancer was introduced into mouse embryos utilizing ES (embryonic stem) cell-mediated gene transfer. In the undifferentiated culture condition, ES lines with enhancer-carrying tkCAT did not express any significant level of CAT (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase). However, when the ES cells were injected into a blastocyst and allowed to differentiate into various somatic cells of an embryo, CAT expression was observed exclusively in lens, and the expression was dependent upon the delta 1-crystallin enhancer. We concluded that the delta 1-crystallin enhancer alone is sufficient for eliciting lens-specific gene expression in developing mouse embryos and that the mechanism of lens-specific regulation effected by the delta 1-crystallin enhancer is conserved between the chicken and the mouse.

Overlapping positive and negative regulatory elements determine lens-specific activity of the delta 1-crystallin enhancer.

Lens-specific expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene is governed by an enhancer in the third intron, and the 30-bp-long DC5 fragment was found to be responsible for eliciting the lens-specific activity. Mutational analysis of the DC5 fragment identified two contiguous, interdependent positive elements and a negative element which overlaps the 3'-located positive element. Previously identified ubiquitous factors delta EF1 bound to the negative element and repressed the enhancer activity in nonlens cells. Mutation and cotransfection analyses indicated the existence of an activator which counteracts the action of delta EF1 in lens cells, probably through binding site competition. We also found a group of nuclear factors, collectively called delta EF2, which bound to the 5'-located positive element. delta EF2a and -b were the major species in lens cells, whereas delta EF2c and -d predominated in nonlens cells. These delta EF2 proteins probably cooperate with factors bound to the 3'-located element in activation in lens cells and repression in nonlens cells. delta EF2 proteins also bound to a promoter sequence of the gamma F-crystallin gene, suggesting that delta EF2 proteins are involved in lens-specific regulation of various crystallin classes.

Overlapping positive and negative regulatory elements determine lens-specific activity of the delta 1-crystallin enhancer.

Lens-specific expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene is governed by an enhancer in the third intron, and the 30-bp-long DC5 fragment was found to be responsible for eliciting the lens-specific activity. Mutational analysis of the DC5 fragment identified two contiguous, interdependent positive elements and a negative element which overlaps the 3'-located positive element. Previously identified ubiquitous factors delta EF1 bound to the negative element and repressed the enhancer activity in nonlens cells. Mutation and cotransfection analyses indicated the existence of an activator which counteracts the action of delta EF1 in lens cells, probably through binding site competition. We also found a group of nuclear factors, collectively called delta EF2, which bound to the 5'-located positive element. delta EF2a and -b were the major species in lens cells, whereas delta EF2c and -d predominated in nonlens cells. These delta EF2 proteins probably cooperate with factors bound to the 3'-located element in activation in lens cells and repression in nonlens cells. delta EF2 proteins also bound to a promoter sequence of the gamma F-crystallin gene, suggesting that delta EF2 proteins are involved in lens-specific regulation of various crystallin classes.

IGF-I and the IGF-I receptor in development of nonmammalian vertebrates.

Extracellular signals are likely to be involved in the control of growth and differentiation during embryogenesis of vertebrates. These signals include, among others, several members of the insulin family: insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, and insulin. In the chick embryo, maternal IGF-I is stored in the yolk. In addition, the embryonic IGF-I gene is expressed very early and in late development in multiple tissues. We have used reverse-transcribed (RT) RNA and amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect IGF-I gene expression. IGF-I was preferentially expressed in cephalic regions during late neurulation and early organogenesis. During late organogenesis, in some tissues, such as the eye lens, IGF-I gene expression is compartmentalized to a subset of cells, the epithelial cells. In these lens cells, IGF-I stimulates transcription of the delta-crystallin gene. Competence to respond to IGF-I exists in multiple cell types, since, based on binding studies, receptors for IGF-I are widespread in the gastrulating and neurulating embryo. Target tissues in which an autocrine/paracrine role for IGF-I appears more likely are the developing eye lens and retina, which are avascular organs rich in IGF-I receptors. In late development, IGF-I may have an additional endocrine role, with an impact on the general growth of the chick embryo. In embryos developed ex ovo, that show growth retardation after day 10 of embryogenesis, IGF-I serum levels are very low. By day 8, expression of IGF-I mRNA in these embryos is markedly reduced in multiple tissues.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transcriptional Control of δ-Crystallin Gene Expression in the Chicken Embryo Lens: Demonstration by a New Method for Measuring mRNA Metabolism

Crystallins are proteins that accumulate to very high concentrations in the fiber cells of the lens of the eye. Crystallins are responsible for the transparency and high refractive index that are essential for lens function. In the chicken embryo, delta-crystallin accounts for more than 70% of the newly synthesized lens proteins. We used density labeling and gene-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine the mechanism regulating the expression of the two very similar delta-crystallin genes. Newly synthesized RNA was separated from preexisting RNA by incubating the lenses with 15N- and 13C-labeled ribonucleosides and then separating newly synthesized, density-labeled RNA from the bulk of light RNA by equilibrium density centrifugation in NaI-KI gradients. The relative abundances of the two crystallin mRNAs in the separated fractions were then determined by PCR. This method permitted the quantitation of newly synthesized processed and unprocessed delta-crystallin mRNAs. Additional studies used intron- and gene-specific PCR primers to determine the relative expression of the two delta-crystallin genes in processed RNA and unprocessed RNA extracted from different regions of the embryonic lens. Results of these tests indicated that the differential expression of the delta-crystallin genes was regulated primarily at the level of transcription. This outcome was not expected on the basis of the results of previous studies, which used in vitro transcription and transfection methods to evaluate the relative strengths of delta-crystallin promoter and enhancer sequences. Our data suggest that the cultured cells used in these earlier studies may not have provided an accurate view of delta-crystallin regulation in the intact lens.

Transcriptional control of delta-crystallin gene expression in the chicken embryo lens: demonstration by a new method for measuring mRNA metabolism.

Crystallins are proteins that accumulate to very high concentrations in the fiber cells of the lens of the eye. Crystallins are responsible for the transparency and high refractive index that are essential for lens function. In the chicken embryo, delta-crystallin accounts for more than 70% of the newly synthesized lens proteins. We used density labeling and gene-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine the mechanism regulating the expression of the two very similar delta-crystallin genes. Newly synthesized RNA was separated from preexisting RNA by incubating the lenses with 15N- and 13C-labeled ribonucleosides and then separating newly synthesized, density-labeled RNA from the bulk of light RNA by equilibrium density centrifugation in NaI-KI gradients. The relative abundances of the two crystallin mRNAs in the separated fractions were then determined by PCR. This method permitted the quantitation of newly synthesized processed and unprocessed delta-crystallin mRNAs. Additional studies used intron- and gene-specific PCR primers to determine the relative expression of the two delta-crystallin genes in processed RNA and unprocessed RNA extracted from different regions of the embryonic lens. Results of these tests indicated that the differential expression of the delta-crystallin genes was regulated primarily at the level of transcription. This outcome was not expected on the basis of the results of previous studies, which used in vitro transcription and transfection methods to evaluate the relative strengths of delta-crystallin promoter and enhancer sequences. Our data suggest that the cultured cells used in these earlier studies may not have provided an accurate view of delta-crystallin regulation in the intact lens.

Sequence-specific scission of DNA by the chemical nuclease activity of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper(I) targeted by RNA.

RNAs modified with the chemical nuclease 1,10-phenanthroline-copper(I) can achieve the sequence-specific scission of single- and double-stranded DNA targets. The RNAs are prepared in vitro by using 5-(3-aminoallyl)-UTP as the sole source of UTP and can be readily modified with 1,10-phenanthroline by using N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyl-dithio)propionate (SPDP) to cross-link the ligand to the aminoallyl moiety. Single-stranded DNAs are efficiently cleaved at multiple sites because 1,10-phenanthroline is incorporated at several uridines in the sequence. Sequence-specific double-stranded scission of duplex DNA can also be accomplished with 1,10-phenanthroline-derivatized RNA within R loops. These triple-stranded structures form in 70% formamide and involve the displacement of one strand of DNA by the RNA of identical sequence. R loop-directed scission is the first method for DNA scission applicable to any sequence. A unique application of R loop-targeted nucleolytic scission, which relies on its ability to cut DNA at any sequence, is the determination of the distance between two marker DNA sequences within a target. In this case, 1,10-phenanthroline-linked RNAs are prepared from the two distinct sequences and used to cut the DNA fragment after R-loop formation. The size of the fragment liberated by these methods is a direct measure in base pairs of the distance between the two DNA sequences. For example, the distance separating two chicken delta crystallin (delta 1 and delta 2) genes has been confirmed as 24 kilobases by this method.

Expression of insulin-like growth factor I in developing lens is compartmentalized.

We, and others, have recently reported that insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) mRNA is expressed in multiple tissues during embryogenesis and in whole embryos during early organogenesis. Therefore, it is likely that, in addition to any effect on embryo growth, IGF-I plays a paracrine/autocrine role in development. The embryonic chicken lens, an avascular organ composed by a single type of cell that undergoes differentiation in vivo and in vitro, is an ideal model to characterize the paracrine/autocrine action of IGF-I. The lens cells express IGF-I receptors, and respond to exogenous IGF-I with induction of fiber cells differentiation and stimulation of delta-crystallin gene transcription. Whether embryonic lens cells express IGF-I was uncertain. In the present study, we used a sensitive semiquantitative method (reverse transcription of RNA followed by amplification with the polymerase chain reaction) to analyze IGF-I gene expression. An amplified product of the expected length (209 base pairs) was found in days 8, 12, 15, and 19 lenses. At all embryo ages studied, the product was more readily detected in the lens than in the liver, while in eye tissues (excluding lens), IGF-I expression was relatively high. After microdissection of the epithelial cells from the fully differentiated fiber cells, IGF-I expression was detected exclusively in the epithelial cells. IGF-I immunoactivity was found using high performance liquid chromatography followed by radioimmunoassay in the days 8-19 lens extracts, and in primary cultures of isolated epithelial cells. Our previous and present findings show that the lens has all the elements for IGF-I autocrine/paracrine action in development.

Expression of duck lens delta-crystallin cDNAs in yeast and bacterial hosts. Delta 2-crystallin is an active argininosuccinate lyase.

The major soluble protein in the lenses of most birds and reptiles is delta-crystallin. In chickens and ducks the delta-crystallin gene has duplicated, and in the duck both genes contribute to the protein in the lens, while in the chicken lens there is a great preponderance of the delta 1 gene product. Purified delta-crystallin has previously been shown to possess the enzymatic activity of argininosuccinate lyase. In order to determine the enzymatic properties of the two duck delta-crystallins their corresponding cDNA molecules were placed in yeast and bacterial expression plasmids. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the activity of each crystallin was assessed by transformation of the expression plasmids into a strain deficient for argininosuccinate lyase activity. The ability of the resulting yeast to grow on arginine deficient medium was used as a measure of enzymatic activity. Yeast expressing the duck delta 2-crystallin protein grew rapidly, while those expressing delta 1-crystallin failed to grow. Enzyme activity measurements confirmed the presence of activity in the delta 2-crystallin-expressing yeast, and no detectable activity could be demonstrated in the delta 1-crystallin-expressing yeast. Northern blotting of RNA from the transformed yeast revealed equal levels of mRNA species from the two constructs. For further analysis, the delta 2-crystallin cDNA was placed in the bacterial expression plasmid, pET-3d. The delta 2-crystallin protein produced in Escherichia coli was purified to homogeneity and analyzed to determine the kinetic properties. A Km of 0.35 mM was determined for argininosuccinate and a Vm of 3.5 mumols/min/mg was determined. These data demonstrate that, following duplication of the primordial argininosuccinate lyase gene, one of the genes maintained its role as an enzyme (delta 2-crystallin) while also serving as a crystallin and the other has evolved to specialize as a structural protein in the lens (delta 1-crystallin), presumably losing most or all of its catalytic capacity.

Transgenesis in fish

Gene transfer into fish embryo is being performed in several species (trout, salmon, carps, tilapia, medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, loach, catfish, etc.). In most cases, pronuclei are not visible and microinjection must be done into the cytoplasm of early embryos. Several million copies of the gene are generally injected. In medaka, transgenesis was attempted by injection of the foreign gene into the nucleus of oocyte. Several reports indicate that the injected DNA was rapidly replicated in the early phase of embryo development, regardless of the origin and the sequence of the foreign DNA. The survival of the injected embryos was reasonably good and a large number reached maturity. The proportion of transgenic animals ranged from 1 to 50% or more, according to species and to experimentators. The reasons for this discrepancy have not been elucidated. In all species, the transgenic animals were mosaic. The copy number of the foreign DNA was different in the various tissues of an animal and a proportion lower than 50% of F1 offsprings received the gene from their parents. This suggests that the foreign DNA was integrated into the fish genome at the two cells stage or later. An examination of the integrated DNA in different cell types of an animal revealed that integration occurred mainly during early development. The transgene was found essentially unrearranged in the fish genome of the founders and offsprings. The transgenes were therefore stably transmitted to progeny in a Mendelian fashion. Southern blot analysis revealed the presence of possible junction fragments and also of minor bands which may result from a rearrangement of the injected DNA. In all species, the integrated DNA appeared mainly as random end-to-end concatemers. In adult trout blood cells, a small proportion of the foreign DNA was maintained in the form of non-integrated concatemers, as judged by the existence of end fragments. The transgenes were generally only poorly expressed. The majority of the injected gene constructs contained essentially mammalian or higher vertebrates sequences. The comparison of the expression efficiency of these constructs in transfected fish and mammalian cells indicates that some of the mammalian DNA sequences are most efficiently understood by the fish cell machinery. Chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene under the control of promoters from Rous sarcoma virus, and human cytomegalovirus, was expressed in several tissues of transgenic fish. Chicken delta-crystallin gene was expressed in several tissues of transgenic fish.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)