Delivery Of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Research Articles

Impact of Prepectoral vs. Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement on Post-mastectomy Radiation Therapy Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Implant-based reconstruction is the most common method of postmastectomy reconstruction. Many patients require postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). Tissue expanders (TEs), typically inserted as a first stage, have historically been placed subpectorally. More recently, prepectoral reconstruction has gained popularity, but its impact on PMRT is unknown. Prior studies focus on complication rates and aesthetic outcomes. This study examines whether there is a difference in radiation dosimetry among patients undergoing prepectoral versus subpectoral TE reconstruction. Electronic medical records and radiation plans of 50 patients (25 prepectoral, 25 subpectoral) who underwent mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction at our institution or affiliate site were reviewed. Pectoralis major muscle and chest wall structures were contoured and mean percentage volumes of these structures receiving less than 95%, 100%, and more than 105% target radiation dose were calculated, as were heart and ipsilateral lung doses. Welch two sample t test, Fisher exact test, and Pearson chi-squared tests were performed. The groups had comparable patient and tumor characteristics and underwent similar ablative and reconstructive procedures and radiation dosimetry. Subpectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving less than 95% target dose ("cold spots"); prepectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving greater than 105% ("hot spots") and 100% target doses. There were no differences in chest wall, heart, and lung doses. Our results demonstrate an increased mean percentage area of pectoralis cold spots with subpectoral reconstruction and increased area of hot spots and 100% dose delivery to the pectoralis in prepectoral patients. Larger studies should analyze long-term effects of prepectoral reconstruction on radiation dosing and recurrence rates.

Patterns of postmastectomy radiation therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancerpatients with pathologically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer who are pathologically node-negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. The study included 8766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and a greater number of lymph nodes examined. The unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p = NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03). The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node-positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.

The Impact of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement on the Delivery of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The Impact of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement on the Delivery of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Post-mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the BEATRICE Trial.

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves locoregional control and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. With the evolution of systemic therapy, the benefit of PMRT in patients with triple-negative disease requires further evaluation. BEATRICE is a phase III randomized clinical trial that examined the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The current study is a retrospective analysis of data on patients enrolled and treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was determining the effect of PMRT on locoregional recurrence rates (LRR). Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression, and LRR curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method. In total, 940 patients were included in our analysis, of whom 359 (38.2%) received PMRT while 581 (61.8%) did not. At median follow-up of 5 years, no significant difference in LRR was noted between the PMRT and no PMRT groups in node-negative patients (HR = 1.09). Patients with N1 disease had 5-year LRR-free survival of 96% for PMRT versus 91% for no PMRT (HR = 0.46). Most N2 patients received PMRT and had 5-year LRR-free survival of 76%. PMRT benefit in TNBC patients treated with modern systemic therapy is lower than historical reports. Delivery of PMRT in patients with N1 disease enrolled in the BEATRICE trial was not shown to improve local control. As this might be due to patient selection for PMRT, future randomized controlled trials are required to assess the role of PMRT in this patient population.

Breast Reconstruction and Post Mastectomy Radiotherapy: A Primer for Members of a Multidisciplinary Team

Background: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is a key component in managing breast cancer with increased potential for locoregional recurrence. Breast reconstruction has evolved to include various techniques that can be categorized according to the type of reconstruction (implant-based versus autologous reconstruction), and the timing of reconstruction (one versus two-step techniques). Methods/Results: This review article aims to provide a digestible summary of PMRT in the context of breast reconstruction by summarizing salient existing literature with a focus on considerations of the plastic surgeon. The main findings summarized in this review include the technique and timing of breast reconstruction, how breast reconstruction can affect radiation delivery, and the type of reconstruction. Within implant-based reconstruction, existing data on the location of the implant in the context of PMRT and PMRT delivery to the tissue expander versus permanent implant are reviewed. Each consideration may alter the probability of successful reconstruction and patient satisfaction.Conclusion: It is essential for the multidisciplinary breast cancer team to have knowledge of the various reconstructive options, and to understand the safety and comparative effectiveness of staged reconstruction in the setting of PMRT. Additionally, one must consider that reconstructive procedures may have implications on the timely administration of PMRT. This review serves as a reference for members of the oncologic care team when discussing reconstructive options with patients who will receive PMRT as part of their treatment plan.

Patterns of post-mastectomy radiation therapy in clinically node positive breast cancer patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node positive breast cancer who are pathologically node negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive non-metastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. The study included 8,766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and greater number of lymph nodes examined. Unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p=NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03). The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.

New Frontiers in Hypofractionation for Regional Nodal Irradiation in Breast Cancer

In recent years, there have been a number of small, yet notable practice changes in the delivery of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients. Herein, we describe the role of PMRT and its evolving delivery with hypofractionated regimens. The UK START trials and whole-breast hypofractionation studies established the safety and effectiveness of accelerated radiotherapy. This has inspired further investigations of similar principles in patients with reconstruction, acute and late toxicities associated with hypofractionated regimens, socioeconomic benefit, and evolving delivery techniques. Overall, results from clinical trials evaluating hypofractionation for RNI or PMRT appear promising despite the limited length of follow-up. Ongoing clinical trials will provide valuable data on the safety of hypofractionation in breast cancer patients with immediate reconstruction. Hypofractionation for PMRT represents high-quality care that is not only more convenient for patients but also more cost-effective for the healthcare system.

Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the HERA Trial

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves recurrence rates and overall survival in breast cancer patients. However, it remains unclear whether these findings can be applied to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive patients treated with trastuzumab. The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial is a phase III randomized clinical trial that established the efficacy of trastuzumab in HER-2 positive early stage breast cancer. The present study is a retrospective analysis of prospective data of 1633 trial patients treated with mastectomy and adjuvant trastuzumab. The primary objective of the study was to determine the effect of PMRT on loco-regional recurrence rates (LRR). Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox models, and LRR curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Our analysis included 940 patients (57.6%) who received PMRT and 693 patients (42.4%) who did not. Patients in the PMRT group had worse prognostic disease characteristics. At a median follow-up of 11 years, no significant difference in LRR was noted after PMRT in node negative (N0) patients (P = .96). Patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes had a LRR-free survival of 97% in the PMRT group compared with 90% in the no PMRT group (hazard ratio = 0.28, P = .004) and a nonsignificant improved overall survival after PMRT (hazard ratio = 0.63, P = .06). PMRT delivery in HER-2 positive breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes decreases the risk of LRR. Although the magnitude of PMRT benefit is lower than historic studies, the present findings are in favor of PMRT for HER-2 positive breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 involved nodes. Future studies are needed to determine which HER-2 positive breast cancer patients benefit the most from PMRT.

Air Expander Implant Can Compromise Target Coverage and Dose Homogeneity of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy

AeroForm® (AirXpanders, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) is a carbon dioxide-based, patient-controlled tissue expander that enables patients to undergo more convenient and rapid tissue expansion compared to traditional saline expanders. It was approved by the FDA for use in post-mastectomy reconstruction at the end of 2016, and has been increasingly seen in women requiring post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The presence of the AeroForm®, however, presents a dosimetric challenge in the delivery of PMRT given the presence of high density stainless steel within the expander. In this study we explore the ability of the treatment planning system (TPS) to predict dose in the presence of an Aeroform®, and confirm the accuracy of our TPS by performing in vivo dose measurements in a patient receiving PMRT. External beam radiation planning was performed in treatment planning software. A 3D field-in-field treatment plan using an electron-photon match medially to cover the internal mammary nodes was created and calculated using both Acuros XB (AXB) and anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). A material override for high density material was incorporated into the AXB algorithm to account for areas of saturation on our planning CT scan due to the expander. In vivo dose measurements were performed using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLD, nanoDot™, Landauer) placed at designated points correlating to cold spots seen in the TPS on our patient. We observed significant areas of dose reduction within our target volume using the AXB algorithm in our treatment planning system (TPS). This was not apparent when using AAA. In vivo measurements confirmed our observed loss of target volume coverage lateral to the AeroForm® due to attenuation of the tangent photon beams by the implant device. Loss of target volume coverage medially was less pronounced as this area was covered separately by an electron field in our treatment plan. We observed a 6% difference (170 vs 159.5cGy, prescribed dose 200cGy) between AXB calculated dose with delivered dose. We found that increasing bolus from 0.5 to 1 cm only modestly improved coverage at the skin in our TPS, however did not overcome attenuation by the expander. AXB predicts dose more accurately than AAA in Aeroform® patients due to the presence of both high density stainless steel and air within the expander. The Aeroform® tissue expander, however, significantly attenuates incoming photon tangent beams. The significant cold spots witnessed both medially and laterally to the expander may be overcome with additional boost fields, however, are not resolved with the addition of bolus.

Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Women with T1-T2 Tumors and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes: Analysis of the Breast International Group 02-98 Trial

To analyze the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for patients with T1-T2 tumors and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes enrolled on the Breast International Group (BIG) 02-98 trial. The BIG 02-98 trial randomized patients to receive adjuvant anthracycline with or without taxane chemotherapy. Delivery of PMRT was nonrandomized and performed according to institutional preferences. The present analysis was performed on participants with T1-T2 breast cancer and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes who had undergone mastectomy and axillary nodal dissection. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the effect of PMRT on risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR), breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. We identified 684 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, of whom 337 (49%) had received PMRT. At 10years, LRR risk was 2.5% in the PMRT group and 6.5% in the no-PMRT group (hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.73; P=.005). Lower LRR after PMRT was noted for patients randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with no taxane (10-year LRR: 3.4% vs 9.1%; P=.02). No significant differences in breast cancer-specific survival (84.3% vs 83.9%) or overall survival (81.7% vs 78.3%) were observed according to receipt of PMRT. Our analysis of the BIG 02-98 trial shows excellent outcomes in women with T1-T2 tumors and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes found in axillary dissection. Although PMRT improved LRR in this cohort, the number of events remained low at 10years. In all groups, 10-year rates of LRR were relatively low compared with historical studies. As such, the use of PMRT in women with 1 to 3 positive nodes should be tailored to individual patient risks.

Trends and variations in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer in patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.

High-level evidence is lacking to guide treatment decisions about postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients who have breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes who receive contemporary systemic therapies, leading to potential variations in PMRT delivery. The objective of this study was to examine nationwide trends in PMRT use in this group. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify 93,372 women who had T1-T2N1 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2012. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) and those who had bilateral breast cancers were excluded. Time trends were evaluated using the Cochrane-Armitage test and correlated the receipt of PMRT with various patient demographic, facility, clinicopathologic, and treatment variables using multivariable logistic regression. A second analysis was performed for patients who were diagnosed during 2010 and included radiation oncologist density as an additional covariate. P values < .0001 were considered statistically significant. Overall, 22.5% of the study population received PMRT, representing an increase from 19.1% in 2003 to 30.3% in 2012. Factors associated with greater PMRT use included younger age, lower Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, shorter distance to the treating facility, treatment at a comprehensive cancer program, facility location in the New England Census division, and higher density of radiation oncologists. Increased PMRT use was associated with later year of diagnosis, receipt of chemotherapy, receipt of hormone therapy, higher grade disease, larger tumor size, greater numbers of positive lymph nodes, positive margins, and absence of immediate breast reconstruction (all P < .0001). The receipt of PMRT by patients with breast cancer who have 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes has increased over time, with wide variability in practice patterns in the United States. Cancer 2018;124:482-90. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

An Innovative Risk-Reducing Approach to Postmastectomy Radiation Delivery after Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Introduction:Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has known deleterious side effects in immediate autologous breast reconstruction. However, plastic surgeons are rarely involved in PMRT planning. Our institution has adopted a custom bolus approach for all patients receiving PMRT. This offers uniform distribution of standard radiation doses, thereby minimizing radiation-induced changes while maintaining oncologic safety. We present our 8-year experience with the custom bolus approach for PMRT delivery in immediate autologous breast reconstruction.Methods:All immediate autologous breast reconstruction patients requiring PMRT after 2006 were treated with the custom bolus approach. Retrospective chart review was performed to compare the postirradiation complications, reconstruction outcomes, and oncologic outcomes of these patients with those of previous patients at our institution who underwent standard bolus, and to historical controls from peer-reviewed literature.Results:Over the past 10 years, of the 29 patients who received PMRT, 10 were treated with custom bolus. Custom bolus resulted in fewer radiation-induced skin changes and less skin tethering/fibrosis than standard bolus (0% vs 10% and 20% vs 35%, respectively), and less volume loss and contour deformities compared with historical controls (10% vs 22.8% and 10% vs 30.7%, respectively).Conclusions:Custom bolus PMRT minimizes radiation delivery to the internal mammary vessels, anastomoses, and skin; uniformly doses the surgical incision; and provides the necessary radiation dose to prevent recurrence. Because custom bolus PMRT may reduce the deleterious effects of radiation on reconstructive outcomes while maintaining safe oncologic results, we encourage all plastic surgeons to collaborate with radiation oncologists to consider this technique.

Abstract P2-13-01: An innovative risk-reducing approach to post-mastectomy radiation delivery following autologous breast reconstruction

Abstract Introduction: There is no consensus among radiation oncologists regarding delivery of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after immediate autologous breast reconstruction, and plastic surgeons rarely participate in this decision-making process. However, radiation-induced changes markedly influence flap outcomes and affect the flap permanently. We present an innovative approach for PMRT delivery, through the use of custom bolus. This technique provides individualized, targeted PMRT to the reconstructed breast to minimize flap-related complications. Methods: All patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction between 2005 and 2014 at our institution were identified. Radiation was delivered to the reconstructed autologous breast in 29 patients. Post-irradiation complications and reconstruction outcomes were compared for patients treated with custom bolus, standard PMRT, and historical controls. Results: Over the past 10 years, 157 patients (226 breasts) underwent immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Of the 29 patients who received PMRT, 10 were treated with custom bolus. The custom bolus uses perforated Aquaplast and a nearly tissue-equivalent wax to form a cast which conforms to the irregular contours of the chest wall, allowing for easy application through the duration of treatment. Pre-irradiation computed tomography was used to optimize dose distribution, evaluate the internal mammary vessels, and target the deeper tissues adjacent to the chest wall (minimizing dose inhomogeneity to the skin). Custom bolus resulted in fewer radiation-induced skin changes and less skin tethering/fibrosis than standard bolus (0% vs 10% and 20% vs 35%, respectively), and less volume loss and contour deformities compared with historical controls (10% vs 22.8% and 10% vs 30.7%, respectively). Conclusion: The use of custom bolus tailors radiation delivery to the internal mammary vessels, anastomoses, and skin; uniformly doses the surgical incision; and provides the necessary radiation dose to prevent recurrence, thus not compromising oncologic safety. It is easily fabricated, cost-effective and placement is straightforward and reproducible. Because radiation has negative effects on autologous breast reconstruction and often results in vascular intimal fibrosis and fat necrosis, plastic surgeons should participate in radiation planning. Our custom bolus PMRT technique reduces the incidence of these radiation effects. Citation Format: Piper ML, Evangelista M, Amara D, Daar DA, Foster RD, Fowble B, Sbitany H. An innovative risk-reducing approach to post-mastectomy radiation delivery following autologous breast reconstruction. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.

Proton radiotherapy for chest wall and regional lymphatic radiation; dose comparisons and treatment delivery

PurposeThe delivery of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can be challenging for patients with left sided breast cancer that have undergone mastectomy. This study investigates the use of protons for PMRT in selected patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy. We also report the first clinical application of protons for these patients.Methods and materialsEleven patients were planned with protons, partially wide tangent photon fields (PWTF), and photon/electron (P/E) fields. Plans were generated with the goal of achieving 95% coverage of target volumes while maximally sparing cardiac and pulmonary structures. In addition, we report on two patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy and IMN involvement that were treated with a mix of proton and standard radiation.ResultsPWTF, P/E, and proton plans were generated and compared. Reasonable target volume coverage was achieved with PWTF and P/E fields, but proton therapy achieved superior coverage with a more homogeneous plan. Substantial cardiac and pulmonary sparing was achieved with proton therapy as compared to PWTF and P/E. In the two clinical cases, the delivery of proton radiation with a 7.2 to 9 Gy photon and electron component was feasible and well tolerated. Akimbo positioning was necessary for gantry clearance for one patient; the other was treated on a breast board with standard positioning (arms above her head). LAO field arrangement was used for both patients. Erythema and fatigue were the only noted side effects.ConclusionsProton RT enables delivery of radiation to the chest wall and regional lymphatics, including the IMN, without compromise of coverage and with improved sparing of surrounding normal structures. This treatment is feasible, however, optimal patient set up may vary and field size is limited without multiple fields/matching.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy and recommendations for immediate breast reconstruction in women with stage II breast cancer

Recent developments in management have demonstrated superior local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) to mastectomy and chemotherapy. Consequently, PMRT use in patients with stage II breast cancer is increasing. However, it is difficult to predict presence or extent of axillary lymph node involvement before mastectomy. There are two potential problems with performing an immediate breast reconstruction in patients requiring PMRT. First, PMRT may adversely affect the aesthetic outcome of an immediate breast reconstruction. Second, immediate breast reconstruction may interfere with PMRT delivery. With a delayed-immediate approach, however, patients who do not require PMRT may achieve aesthetic outcomes similar to those with immediate reconstruction. In patients requiring PMRT, delayed-immediate breast reconstruction may avoid potential aesthetic and radiation delivery problems after immediate breast reconstruction. Increased PMRT use in early-stage breast cancer requires improved communication among the medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, breast surgeon, and plastic surgeon during treatment planning.

Simultaneous reconstructive surgery for radical mastectomy

Breast reconstruction following radical mastectomy, if desired, is considered vital to the patient's rehabilitation and is an intrinsic part of her breast cancer treatment. Immediate reconstruction – especially immediate reconstruction using autologous tissues – has become more established since the introduction of the skin-sparing mastectomy in the early 1990s. Now, as the more current therapeutic armamentarium has been expanded to feature preoperative tumor shrinking with chemotherapy, accelerated or partial breast radiotherapy, and, in particular, the increased use of breast conservation surgery for larger tumors, immediate breast reconstruction techniques have also further evolved to address the radical mastectomy defect with newer micro-surgical techniques and autologous flap tissues, such as the IGAP, gracilis [1], and SIEA flaps, as well as improved silicone and anatomic saline implant designs [2] with post-operative adjustment capabilities designed to facilitate longer term symmetrical breast reconstruction outcomes. The increased use of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer has increased the complexity of planning for immediate breast reconstruction. Studies have evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstruction performed before radiation therapy, revealing a high incidence of complications and poor aesthetic outcomes [3]. Moreover, immediate breast reconstruction can interfere with the delivery of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary breast conference identification of early breast cancer patients at high risk for radiation therapy has evolved a unique and highly successful 'delayed immediate' reconstruction [4] approach that preserves the aesthetic outcomes of immediate reconstruction and avoids radiation injury to the reconstructive tissues. This is accomplished by utilizing a filled subpectoral tissue expander to temporarily preserve the breast skin envelope until the final tissue pathology is confirmed and the patient either goes on to definitive reconstruction or to radiation therapy with the expander deflated. A total of 28 high-risk early breast cancer patients have undergone the delayed immediate approach with 20 patients (71%) not ultimately requiring radiation therapy. Nineteen patients in the non-radiated group (95%) have now completed definitive reconstruction, primarily with the use of autologous tissues. The eight patients who required radiation have completed the radiation therapy and six (75%) have undergone tissue re-expansion and skin-preserving delayed reconstruction designed to be as similar in outcome to immediate reconstruction as possible. The complication rate for the initial expander placement at the time of mastectomy was 18% for all patients. Five nonradiated patients (25%) had complications in the second stage of definitive reconstruction and one patient (17%) following radiation therapy had complications in the skin-preserving delayed reconstruction. Finally, following the successful experience of the delayed immediate approach for early breast cancer patients, 17 advanced stage patients with planned postoperative radiation therapy also had the opportunity for skin-preserving tissue expansion prior to radiation therapy upon multidisciplinary approval. All the patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five of the patients (29%) had complications in the first stage of expander placement but two patients (12%) have now completed definitive reconstruction following radiation therapy with re-expansion of preserved breast skin and have experienced no complications. Immediate reconstruction minimizes incisional scars on the breast and improves overall breast contour, shape, and appearance. The improved aesthetic outcomes over delayed reconstruction, achieved as well by these diverse skin-preserving 'delayed immediate' approaches without significant incidents of complications, has convinced many breast cancer patients to view mastectomy with reconstruction as a viable and positive treatment choice.

Simultaneous breast reconstruction

The timing of breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been an area of controversy. Simultaneous or immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) allows the patient to adjust to the loss of a breast by restoring her body image. It also reduces the surgical stages involved and provides an enhanced aesthetic outcome when combined with skin sparing mastectomy techniques. Still, IBR has not been widely accepted due to concerns about interference with locoregional recurrence control, possible delay in adjuvant chemotherapy application and technical difficulties in postmastectomy radiation therapy delivery. During this presentation a clinical case discussion will serve as the introduction to a thorough literature review regarding the oncological safety and convenience of IBR both for partial mastectomy defects after breast conservation surgery as well as for skin sparing mastectomies. Special attention will be given to the main factors involved in the decision making process, including type, stage, and location of the tumour, the necessity for adjuvant therapy, and the techniques used for breast reconstruction. All cases should be individually discussed in a multidisciplinary breast team including pathologists, radiologists, oncologic breast surgeons, reconstructive plastic surgeons, and medical and radiation oncologists, with active participation of the patient.

Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues.

Two recent trials have demonstrated superior locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation therapy to mastectomy and chemotherapy. Based on these results, there has been an increased use of postmastectomy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The inability to determine which patients will require postmastectomy radiation therapy has increased the complexity of planning for immediate breast reconstruction. There are two potential problems with performing an immediate breast reconstruction in a patient who will require postmastectomy radiation therapy. One problem is that postmastectomy radiation therapy can adversely affect the aesthetic outcome of an immediate breast reconstruction. Several studies have evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstructions that were performed before radiation therapy and have revealed a high incidence of complications and poor aesthetic outcomes. Furthermore, these studies have found that often an additional flap is required to restore breast shape and symmetry. The other potential problem is that an immediate breast reconstruction can interfere with the delivery of postmastectomy radiation therapy. During planning for immediate breast reconstruction, it is imperative to carefully review the stage of disease and the likelihood the patient will require postmastectomy radiation therapy. Unfortunately, the ability to detect and predict the presence or extent of axillary lymph node involvement is limited, and the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy is usually not known until after mastectomy. In all cases of decision making regarding possible postoperative radiation therapy and whether or not to perform immediate breast reconstruction, the situation should be discussed at a multidisciplinary conference or addressed among the various medical, surgical, and radiation teams, with active participation by the patient. Immediate breast reconstruction probably should be avoided in patients known to require postmastectomy radiation therapy and delayed until it is certain the therapy will be needed in patients who may require the therapy.