Delays In Patient Discharge Research Articles

Time-To-Event Analysis Of Factors Influencing Delay In Discharge From A Subacute Complex Discharge Unit During The Pandemic

Abstract Background Length of stay (LOS) is the most common outcome measure of effectiveness in discharge planning. It refers to the time expressed in days between admission to and discharge from the hospital. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the average inpatient LOS was 5.8 days, representing a slight increase in the average inpatient LOS of 5.7 days between 2016–2019. Tackling delays in patient discharge is an ongoing challenge, and with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruptions in discharge planning, discontinuity and incoordination between subacute complex discharge units and community care. Methods Our study analysed delaying factors amongst patients with LOS > 15 days during the COVID-19 pandemic using time-to-event analysis. Kaplan–Meier’s plot compared factors causing a delay in discharge to the single factors: age, gender, and multimorbidity. A multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted to age, gender, and multimorbidity predicted factors affecting LOS. Results A total of 390 patients were admitted between March 2020 – February 2021 to a subacute complex discharge unit in an Irish tertiary centre hospital: 326 (83.6%) were >65 years of age and 233 (59.7%) were female. The median (IQR) age was 79 (70–86) years with a median (IQR) of 19.4 (10–41) days. A total of 237 (60.7%) events were uncensored, with LOS > 15 days, of which 138 (58.2%) were female and 124 (52.32%) had > 4 comorbidities; 153 (39.2%) were censored into LOS ≤ 15 days, and death occurred in 19 (4.8%). Conclusion Our study is the first to analyse common factors delaying discharge from a complex discharge unit. Further research is required to explore multimorbidity as a risk factor for mortality in patients with prolonged LOS within a complex discharge unit and target gender-specific frailty measures to achieve high-quality patient management.

Comparative Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine, and 0.75% Ropivacaine With Fentanyl as a Continuous Intraoperative Epidural Infusion on Post-operative Analgesia.

Introduction Persistent postoperative pain leads to impaired patient recovery and delays in discharge of patients. The aim was to compare the efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine to two varying concentrations of ropivacaine, specifically 0.5% and 0.75%, along with fentanyl as a continuous epidural infusion in providing adequate pain relief for patients subjected to infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and methods A prospective randomized comparative study was carried out on 150 patients and was divided into three groups, namely group B, group R, and group RP. Group B indicates (0.5% bupivacaine), group R means (0.5% ropivacaine),and finally, group RP means (0.75% ropivacaine); the three groups had 50 patients each. Group B was administered an epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a concentration of 0.5%, group R was given 0.5% ropivacaine, and group RP was treated with 0.75% ropivacaine; all three groups included 40 mcg fentanyl. The duration of the motor and sensory blockade and the time needed for the first rescue analgesia after the stoppage of epidural infusion were assessed in all three groups.The data were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA, "post hoc Tukey," and chi-square tests. Results Comparison of the duration of motor and sensory blockade among all three groups showed that group RP (0.75% ropivacaine with 2 mcg/cc fentanyl)had the longest duration of 328.8 and 406 minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Comparison of the time of stoppage of epidural infusion to the requirement of first rescue analgesia showed that the group that received 0.75% ropivacaine with 40 mcg fentanyl had the highest value of 258.6 minutes and was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion Epidural intraoperative infusion of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl offers better postoperative pain relief as compared to both 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with fentanyl.

Hospital doctors’ and general practitioners’ perspectives of outpatient discharge processes in Australia: an interpretive approach

BackgroundUnnecessary delays in patient discharge from hospital outpatient clinics have direct consequences for timely access of new patients and the length of outpatient waiting times. The aim of this study was to gain better understanding of hospital doctors’ and general practitioners’ perspectives of the barriers and facilitators when discharging from hospital outpatients to general practice.MethodsAn interpretative approach incorporating semi-structured interviews with 15 participants enabled both hospital doctors and general practitioners to give their perspectives on hospital outpatient discharge processes.ResultsParticipants mentioned various system problems hampering discharge from hospital outpatient clinics to general practice, such as limitations of electronic communication tools, workforce and workload challenges, the absence of agreed discharge principles, and lack of benchmark data. Hospital clinicians may keep patients under their care out of a concern about lack of follow-up and an inability to escalate timely hospital care following discharge. Some hospital clinicians may have a personal preference to provide ongoing care in the outpatient setting. Other factors mentioned were insufficient supervision of junior doctors, a patient preference to remain under hospital care, and the ease of scheduling follow-up appointments.An effective handover process requires protected time, a systematic approach, and a supportive clinical environment including user-friendly electronic communication and clinical handover tools. Several system improvements and models of care were suggested, such as agreed discharge processes, co-designed between hospitals and general practice. Recording and sharing outpatient discharge data may assist to inform and motivate hospital clinicians and support the training of junior doctors.General practitioners participating in the study were prepared to provide continuation of care but require timely clinical management plans that can be applied in the community setting. A hospital re-entry pathway providing rapid access to outpatient hospital resources after discharge could act as a safety net and may be an alternative to the standard 12-month review in hospital outpatient clinics.ConclusionOur study supports the barriers to discharge as mentioned in the literature and adds the perspectives of both hospital clinicians and general practitioners. Potential solutions were suggested including co-designed discharge policies, improved electronic communication tools and a rapid hospital review pathway following discharge.

Communicating Patient Discharge Readiness: An Implementation Evaluation in an Inpatient Hospital Medicine Setting.

The progression of patients through a hospital from admission to discharge can be slowed by delays in patient discharge, increasing pressure on health care staff. We designed and piloted the Discharge Today tool, with the goal of improving the efficiency of patient discharge; however, adoption remained low. To close this implementation gap, we deployed and evaluated a 4-part implementation strategy bundle. We measured the success of implementation by evaluating validated implementation outcomes using both quantitative and qualitative methods, grounded in Normalization Process Theory. The implementation strategies used were effective for increasing use of the Discharge Today tool by hospital medicine physicians and advanced practice providers during both the active and passive implementation periods. While the implementation strategies used were effective, qualitative findings indicate that limitations in the functionality of the tool, alongside inconsistent use of the tool across clinical staff, continued to inhibit adoption.

Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Prognostic Factors of Discharge Outcome in Older Adults.

Severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) is a leading cause of disability and requires intensive rehabilitation treatment. Discharge from the rehabilitation ward is a key moment in patient management. Delays in patient discharge can adversely affect hospital productivity and increase healthcare costs. The discharge should be structured from the hospital admission toward the most appropriate environment. The purpose of our study is to investigate early predictors of outcome for discharge in older adults with sABI. A retrospective study was performed on 22 patients who were admitted to an intensive neurorehabilitation unit between June 2019 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two outcome categories, good outcome (GO) or poor outcome (PO), based on discharge destination, and the possible prognostic factors were analyzed at one and two months after admission. Among the factors analyzed, changes in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) at the first and second month of hospitalization were predictive of GO at discharge (DRS, p = 0.025; LCF, p = 0.011). The presence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at two months after admission was also significantly associated with PO (p = 0.038). High Body Mass Index (BMI) and the presence of sepsis at one month after admission were possible predictors of PO (BMI p = 0.048; sepsis p = 0.014). An analysis of dynamic predictors could be useful to guarantee an early evaluation of hospital discharge in frail patients with sABI.

Improving uptake of simulation in healthcare: User-driven development of an open-source tool for modelling patient flow

ABSTRACT Despite the many examples where simulation has successfully demonstrated its capability in modelling patient flow, there is little evidence of enduring widespread use. Bespoke academic projects provide little scope for repeatable practical application and efforts to develop generic reusable solutions have neither clearly identified the end users nor fully appreciated their multifaceted requirements. Influenced by a review of existing findings and recommendations in addition to a customised survey of prospective end users, a set of practical design principles were elicited in guiding development of a new open-source and versatile tool. Capturing variability in arrivals and length of stay as well as the stochastic nature of dynamic delays in patient discharge and transfer, the PathSimR tool can be used to model various user-defined configurations of outpatient and inpatient pathways. In addition to reporting on early use and engagement initiatives to promote the tool, this study also offers a blueprint for how simulation models can be developed and deployed within the healthcare setting.

Routine Chest Radiography Following Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: Use and Clinical Outcomes

Highlights Abstract Background: A postoperative chest x-ray (CXR) remains part of some hospital protocols following tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement despite the use of operative imaging-guided techniques. The aim is to assess the usefulness of this practice and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource use. Methods: A review of medical records and postoperative CXR was done for 78 adult patients who had tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed in the operating room under fluoroscopy guidance. Catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture (51.3%) or exchanged from an existing catheter over a guide wire (48.7%). The postoperative CXRs were also examined by an independent reviewer to assess the catheter tip position and the need for repositioning to mimic a real-life postoperative setting. Procedural, nursing, and billing records were also reviewed. Results: No patients had a pneumothorax or major complications. On postoperative CXRs, 29 (37.2%) patients had the catheter tips in the right atrium, 23 (29.5%) in the cavoatrial junction, 25 (23.1%) in the superior vena cava, and 1 (1.3%) in the brachiocephalic vein. The independent reviewer found the catheter tips in acceptable anatomical positions in 75 of 78 patients. Only 3 (3.9%) patients had catheter malfunctions during dialysis and exchanged their catheters (2 had high catheters in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein, 1 had a kinked catheter). Postoperative CXRs also caused delays in patient discharge from postanesthesia care units and significant increases in medical expenses (around $199 per patient). Conclusion: Routine CXR after tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheter insertion is unnecessary and does not add to the procedure’s safety or to the patient’s outcome.

A new model of multidimensional discharge planning: continuity of care for frail and complex inpatients.

Delays in patient discharge can adversely affect hospital and emergency room productivity and increase healthcare costs. The discharge should be structured from the hospital admission towards the most appropriate environment. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the Unit, named "Continuity of Care Center" (CCC), to guarantee a safest and fastest hospital discharge in frail patients and to test the effect of our team-approach on hospital outcomes (length of stay and hospital mortality). This is a prospective cohort study carried out in an acute care hospital with 1,558 beds and is equipped with 41 operating theaters. We collected data from October 2016 to June 2019. The time of patient discharge had an important reduction: 15.5±30.8 in the first 3 months vs. 11.0±20.1 in the last 3 months considered. The median of the time of discharge in all 12 months considered was 12 day. The length of stay presented an important reduction from 33.3±47.5 during the first 3 months vs. 28.8±39.5 in the last 3 months of activity of CCC; and a significant reduction of hospital deaths was recorded from 20% during the first 3 months to 14% in the last 3 months of activity of CCC. Results indicate a constant decrease in patient discharge time and length of hospital stay, with a consequent significant reduction of healthcare costs. According to the estimates of Italian Health Ministry concerning Latium region, every hospitalization day has a mean cost of € 674.00. Thus, the CCC activity has contributed to a reduction of approximately 12,832 days of hospitalization, in the considered period, with an estimated hospital saving of € 8,648,761.

Predictive Factors of Extended Length of Hospital Stay Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Veterans Affairs Hospital Population

BackgroundImproved perioperative care for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures has resulted in decreased hospital length of stay (LOS), including effective discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 in many patients. It remains unclear what contributes to discharge delay in patients that are not discharged on POD 1. This study investigated factors associated with delayed discharge in patients whose original planned discharge was on POD 1. MethodsA retrospective cohort of 451 patients who underwent a hip or knee TJA procedure from April 2015 to March 2018 with planned discharge on POD 1 was analyzed. Patient characteristics included demographics, lab values, course of treatment, procedure, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), complications, and other factors. Statistical regression was used to identify factors associated with delayed discharge; odds ratios (OR) were calculated for significant factors (α = 0.05). ResultsOf those studied, 70/451 (15.5%) experienced a delay from the planned POD 1 discharge. An increased likelihood of delayed discharge was associated with a nonhome discharge (P < .001, OR = 8.72 [95% CI: 4.22-18.06]) and higher CCI (P = .034, OR = 1.16 [95% CI: 1.01-1.32]). Inpatient physical therapy on the day of surgery was found to significantly correlate with successful discharge on POD 1 (P = .004, OR = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.25-0.77]). ConclusionMost patients can be discharged on POD 1 after TJA. Physical therapy on the day of surgery increased the likelihood of patients being discharged on POD 1. Those with a higher CCI and a nonhome discharge were more likely to have a discharge delay. This information can help surgeons counsel patients and prepare for postoperative care.

Factors affecting postoperative pain and delay in discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit: A descriptive correlational study

Background: Pain occurring in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) is common, distressing to patients and remains a management challenge for staff. This study aims to identify the factors affecting pain severity and delay in discharge of patients from the PACU. Methods: Data from 590 consecutive postoperative patients in the PACU was collected over one month in 2012 at the Singapore General Hospital. Patient demographics, surgical, intraoperative anaesthetic and recovery data were collected. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pain score and secondary outcome was a delay in discharge. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine preoperative and intraoperative variables that may be associated with pain and delayed discharge. Results: The majority (67.6%) of patients reported no to mild pain while 32.3% reported moderate to severe pain; 65.4% of patients had delayed discharge and 28.3% of these were a result of uncontrolled pain. Factors associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain included younger age, same day admissions, duration of operation &gt;2 h, abdominal, upper limb and spine surgeries and use of general anaesthesia. Factors associated with delay in discharge included higher body mass index, abdominal, spine and superficial surgeries, use of general anaesthesia, moderate to severe pain score and use of nurse controlled analgesia. Conclusions: This study identifies predictive factors for postoperative pain and delay in discharge from the PACU. Knowledge of these factors may help in better clinical judgment for postoperative pain management and can lead to quality improvement measures for patient management and work flow in the PACU.

A5184 - Bariatric discharge teaching: Is there another way?

The discharge nurse on a general surgical unit noted that discharge information given to bariatric surgical patients was similar for all patients regardless of the type of surgery. Repeating this information several times throughout the day caused delays in patient discharge and disruption of nursing workflow.

Comparison of valerian extract and diazepam on anxiety before orthopedic surgery

Introduction: anxiety has a negative effect on healing and tissue repair and spending too much mental and physical energy during prolonged stress can cause hospitalization and delay in discharge of patients. One method of reducing anxiety is the use of medicinal plants that in this study the effects of valerian root on the anxiety was examined. The aim of this study was to Comparison of valerian extract and diazepam on anxiety before orthopedic surgeryMaterials and Methods: In this double blind clinical trial study, 60 patients 15-60 years old referred to Imam Ali (AS) hospital of Bojnoord were selected as available and were also randomly divided into two groups of 30 individuals. At 21 pm before surgery, group 1 received 10 drops of valerian edible oil and group 2 received diazepam (5 mg) mixed in 50 ml of tap water. The Spielberger questionnaire was used to assess anxiety before intervention and one hour before initiation of surgery was recorded. Data was analyzed using statistical tests . The level of significance was measured 0/05 in this study.Results: In this study, in the valerian group there were 83.8% male and 16.7%% female while diazepam group included 23.3% male and 76.7 females. The Difference score of overt and covert anxiety in valerian group was 10.1±1.0 and 12.4±1.3 and in the diazepam group was 9.3±1.1 and 10.7±.03. Comparison of two groups showed no significant difference .Conclusion: Valerian has a good anti-anxiety and can be a substitute for chemical medicines after enough studies

Predictors of inappropriate hospital stay: experience from Iran.

Objective:Hospital services are the most expensive component of modern health care systems and inappropriate hospital stay is one of the most important challenges facing hospitals in many countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of inappropriate hospital stay and investigate the related factors in Semnan city (Iran).Methods:In this study, the Iranian version of Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was used in a representative sample of 300 hospital admissions and 905 hospital days. Data collection was performed during six weeks in January and February 2014 in four wards (two internal medicine and two surgical wards) of two hospitals in Semnan city (Iran).Results:The results showed that 7.4% of admissions and 22.1% of stays have been inappropriate. Inappropriate stays were mainly concerned to the factors, including length of stay, inappropriate admissions, as well as factors related to hospitals. The most frequent causes of unjustifiable days were due to waiting for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures (35.1%), and 20.6% delay in discharge of patients by physicians due to conservative medical policy.Conclusion:In conclusion, this study confirms the existence of inappropriate hospital stays which may be due to patient characteristics and hospital factors. The most unjustifiable reasons for inappropriate hospital stay were related to internal processes of hospital, which mostly could be prevented through appropriate management Therefore, some steps must be taken to decrease inappropriate hospital stay and preserve hospital resources for patients who need them.

The implication of delays in patient discharge: The experience of a neurosurgical centre

The implication of delays in patient discharge: The experience of a neurosurgical centre

The effects of socioeconomic status and race on pediatric neurosurgical shunting

It is established in the literature that disparities exist in the quality of healthcare for patients from disadvantaged backgrounds and lower socioeconomic status. There may be roadblocks within the field of neurosurgery preventing equal access and quality of care. Our goal was to study the similarities between pediatric patients with shunted hydrocephalus of different insurance types and race. A retrospective chart review was performed on all pediatric patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting from 1990-2010 at our institution. Race and insurance type were recorded and assessed against specific outcome measures to statistically compare complication rates. A complete record was found for 373 patients who received 849 shunting procedures at our institution. No differences were found between racial groups and insurance type for overall shunt survival, total revision number, or average time to failure. However, nonwhite patients spent an average of 3days longer in the hospital at initial shunting (p = 0.04), and those with public insurance stayed for 5days longer (p = 0.002). Patients with public insurance were more likely to present with shunt failure from outside hospitals (p = 0.005) and be born prematurely (p < 0.001). Private patients were more likely to have a neoplasm present at time of initial shunt placement (p = 0.003). While overall revision rate was not affected by race or insurance status, there were significant delays in discharge for patients with public insurance. Moreover, potential disparities in outpatient access to primary physicians and specialists may be affecting care.

DSL-007 Does Pharmacy Contribute to Delays in Hospital Discharge?

BackgroundEfficient management of patient flow including timely discharge from hospitals is vital. Patients in UK hospitals are commonly given individually labelled medicines to take home (TTOs). It is perceived by...

80 PPCI: is there a role for the ACS ANP?

<h3>Introduction</h3> Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is now considered the treatment of choice for patients experiencing ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2010). One of the many benefits claimed is reduced length of stay due to decreased morbidity (Zahn <i>et al</i> 2000, Kalla <i>et al</i> 2006). To assess performance of one English PPCI 24/7 provider organisation against the national average length of stay (LOS) for patients post PPCI, a retrospective baseline audit was conducted. This demonstrated an average LOS of 4.4 days which is above the National Infarct Angioplasty Project 2008 average LOS of 3 days. A 48 h nurse led discharge (NLD) protocol was therefore developed and introduced by the acute coronary syndromes advanced nurse practitioner to streamline the patient journey. This instructed the nurse and/or physician to ensure appropriate investigation and documentation was carried out in a timely manner to avoid unnecessary delays in patient discharge. <h3>Method</h3> Suitability criteria for the 48-h NLD protocol were established, which included: absence of acute complications (eg,: bleeding, haemodynamic instability, ongoing chest pain, ejection fraction &lt;40%, respiratory compromise); appropriate support at discharge. Following the baseline audit, data were electronically collected prospectively for 5 months, measuring date of admission to date of discharge to the usual place of residence. After 5 months the audit was repeated to assess the average length of stay for patients presenting with STEMI. <h3>Result</h3> Between 1st April 2010 and 31st August 2010, a total of 274 patients were admitted with STEMI. Of these, 122 (45%) met the NLD criteria and were discharged by the ACS ANP. The remaining 152 (55%) were discharged by the medical physicians. It was noted that introduction of the protocol also facilitated a structured approach to discharge for the medical team. The average LOS for all PPCI patients (n=274) decreased from 4.4 days to 3 days (30%). For patients that were seen and discharged solely by the advanced nurse practitioner (n=122), the average LOS decreased from 4.4 days to 2.0 days (55%). <h3>Conclusions/Implications</h3> In the current financial climate, a decrease in LOS can have a significant impact on any organisational resources thus increasing efficiency saving and patient throughput. This demonstrates part of the added value the advanced nurse practitioner brings to patient care and to tertiary centres that provide a 24/7 PPCI service.

Evaluation of nurse‐led discharge following laparoscopic surgery

The United Kingdom's Department of Health has identified reducing delays in patient discharge as a key aim for Health Service development. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair may be safely performed on a short stay basis, but day case rates remain low, with delays in discharge identified as a major contributing factor. Nurse-led discharge has been widely advocated to speed patient discharge across varied specialities, but objective evidence to support its use is lacking. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led discharge following laparoscopic surgery. A retrospective comparison of doctor-led and nurse-led discharge following laparoscopic surgery was performed by analysis of two consecutive 4-month periods, prior to and following the introduction of nurse-led discharge by a laparoscopic nurse specialist. Outcomes assessed included time to discharge, reasons for delayed discharge, hospital readmissions and primary care episodes following discharge. A total of 128 patients were included in the study, with each discharge group containing 64 patients. Patients in the nurse-led discharge group were significantly more likely to be discharged on the day of surgery than patients in the doctor-led discharge group (17.2% vs. 4.7%; P = 0.023), with a highly significant difference in same day discharge rates noted among patients operated on during morning theatre lists (44.0% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.006). There was no significant difference between the discharge groups in readmission rates or in the number of patients seeking primary care attention following discharge. Nurse-led discharge may speed discharge following laparoscopic surgery with no apparent detriment to patient care.

Predicting Patient Discharge Disposition After Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States

The purpose of this study was to develop an easily administered tool to preoperatively predict patient discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty in the United States. Data were collected in a retrospective review of 517 medical charts and analyzed using logistic regression to develop a model for predicting the likelihood that a patient will not be discharged directly home. The resulting regression model was the basis for the nomogram, named the Predicting Location after Arthroplasty Nomogram. This model demonstrated a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.867, excellent calibration, and external validation as demonstrated by a concordance index of 0.861. Preoperative knowledge that a patient is likely to require an extended care facility allows the clinical care team to make appropriate arrangements and avoid potential delays in patient discharge.

Wasted Hospital Days Impair the Value of Length-of-Stay Variables in the Quality Assessment of Trauma Care

Hospital length of stay (LOS) is frequently used to evaluate the quality of trauma care but LOS may be impacted by nonmedical factors as well. We reviewed our experience with delays in patient discharge to determine its financial consequences and its impact on LOS. We performed an analysis of linked trauma registry and "delayed discharge" databases. Actual LOS (A-LOS) values were compared with calculated ideal LOS (I-LOS) values, and the per cent increase in LOS was calculated. Linear regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of prolonged LOS. One thousand, five hundred and seventeen patients were studied, with an A-LOS of 6.54 days. Seven per cent of patients experienced discharge delays, resulting in 580 excess hospital days. Calculated I-LOS was 6.15 days, 6.34 per cent lower than A-LOS. Other I-LOS estimates were as much as 25 per cent lower than A-LOS. Estimated excess patient charges associated with delayed discharges were $4,000,000 to $15,000,000. Discharge delays are an infrequent, although costly, occurrence that has a significant impact on LOS. LOS therefore may not be an appropriate metric for assessing the quality of trauma care, and should only be used if it has been corrected for discharge delays. Concerted efforts should be directed towards identifying and correcting the factors responsible for delayed discharge in trauma patients.