Risk Of Delayed Graft Function Research Articles

#1103 Delayed initiation or reduced initial dose of calcineurin-inhibitors for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donors after cardiac death, especially expanded criteria donors and those with longer cold ischaemia time, older or with an increased serum creatinine. There is no agreement on the optimal immunosuppressive approach in patients at increased risk of DGF, with strategies including a delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) or initial low dose CNI. Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and harms of delayed initiation of CNI or reduced CNI dose as initial immunosuppression therapy for kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Method We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 07 March 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating early vs delayed initiation of CNI or reduced vs standard initial dose of CNI in kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Three authors independently assessed study eligibility, and two assessed the risk of bias, certainty of evidence, extracted the data, and performed the analysis. Results were reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes and as mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB2 and the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE methods. Results Thirteen studies were included (2386 randomized participants). Incidence of DGF (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; I2 = 18%) and acute rejection (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; I2 = 54%) were similar between early and delayed introduction of CNI, as well as between low vs standard dose of CNI (DGF: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.50; I2 = 9%; acute rejection: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.14; I2 = 58%). There were also no differences in secondary outcomes such as graft function, graft loss, risk of death, or infection. Conclusion In patients at high risk of DGF, the strategy of delaying CNI introduction or starting at a lower dose does not reduce the risk of DGF.

#2468 2-Step-Scores with optional histopathology for the prediction of delayed graft function and 1-year transplant loss in Eurotransplant

Abstract Background and Aims The decision for acceptance or discard of the increasingly rare and marginal deceased donor kidneys in Eurotransplant (ET) countries has to be made without solid evidence. Thus, we developed and validated flexible clinicopathological scores we call 2-Step Scores for the prognosis of delayed graft function (DGF) as 2-Step-DGF and one-year death-censored transplant loss (1y-tl) as 2-Step-1y, reflecting current practice of six ET countries including Croatia and Belgium. Method The training set was n = 620 for DGF and n = 711 for 1y-tl, with validation sets n = 158 and n = 162. In step 1, stepwise logistic regression models including only clinical predictors were used to estimate the risks. In step 2, risk estimates were updated for statistically relevant intermediate risk percentiles with nephropathology. Results Step 1 revealed an increased risk of DGF with increased cold ischaemia time, donor and recipient BMI, dialysis vintage, number of HLA-DR mismatches or recipient CMV IgG positivity. On the training and validation set, c-statistics were 0.672 and 0.704, respectively. At a range between 18% and 36%, accuracy of DGF-prognostication improved with nephropathology including number of glomeruli and Banff cv (updated overall c statistics of 0.696 and 0.701, respectively). Risk of 1y-tl increased in recipients with cold ischaemia time, sum of HLA-A. -B, -DR mismatches and donor age. On training and validation sets, c-statistics were 0.700 and 0.769, respectively. Accuracy of 1y-tl prediction improved (c-statistics = 0.706 and 0.765) with Banff ct. Overall, calibration was good on the training, but moderate on the validation set; discrimination was at least as good as established scores when applied to the validation set. Receiver operating characteristics of both 2-Step-DGF and 2-Step-1y compared to established scores are shown in Figs 1 and 2. Conclusion Our flexible 2-Step Scores with optional inclusion of time-consuming and often unavailable nephropathology should yield good results for clinical practice in ET, and may be superior to established scores. Our scores are adaptable to donation after cardiac death and perfusion pumps use.

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with decreased hospitalization rates in pediatric kidney transplant: A UNOS data review for safety and outcomes with common induction regimens.

We hypothesized that alemtuzumab use is safe in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with equivalent long-term outcomes compared to other induction agents. Using pediatric kidney transplant recipient data in the UNOS database between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, multivariate logistic regression, multivariable Cox regression, and survival analyses were utilized to estimate the likelihoods of 1st-year and all-time hospitalizations, acute rejection, CMV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient mortality among recipients of three common induction regimens (ATG, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab). There were no differences in acute rejection or graft failure among induction or maintenance regimens. Basiliximab was associated with lower odds of DGF in deceased donor recipients (OR 0.77 [0.60-0.99], p = .04). Mortality was increased in patients treated with steroid-containing maintenance (HR 1.3 [1.005-1.7] p = .045). Alemtuzumab induction correlated with less risk of CMV infection than ATG (OR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .039). Steroid-containing maintenance conferred lower rate of PTLD compared to steroid-free maintenance (HR 0.59 [0.4-0.8] p = .001). Alemtuzumab was associated with less risk of hospitalization within 1 year (OR 0.79 [0.67-0.95] p = .012) and 5 years (HR 0.54 [0.46-0.65] p < .001) of transplantation. Steroid maintenance also decreased 5 years hospitalization risk (HR 0.78 [0.69-0.89] p < .001). Pediatric KTRs may be safely treated with alemtuzumab induction without increased risk of acute rejection, DGF, graft loss, or patient mortality. The decreased risk of CMV infections and lower hospitalization rates compared to other agents make alemtuzumab an attractive choice for induction in pediatric KTRs, especially in those who cannot tolerate ATG.

Antecedent Cardiac Arrest Status of Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD) Kidney Donors and the Risk of Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation: A Cohort Study.

The number of donors from donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) has increased by at least 4-fold over the past decade. This study evaluated the association between the antecedent cardiac arrest status of controlled DCDD donors and the risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant, the associations between antecedent cardiac arrest status of DCDD donors before withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support, DGF, posttransplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and allograft loss were examined using adjusted logistic, linear mixed modeling, and cox regression, respectively. Among donors who experienced cardiac arrest, we evaluated the association between duration and unwitnessed status of arrest and DGF. A total of 1173 kidney transplant recipients received DCDD kidneys from 646 donors in Australia between 2014 and 2019. Of these, 335 DCDD had antecedent cardiac arrest. Compared with recipients of kidneys from donors without antecedent cardiac arrest, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for DGF was 0.85 (0.65-1.11) among those with kidneys from donors with cardiac arrest. There was no association between antecedent cardiac arrest and posttransplant eGFR or allograft loss. The duration of cardiac arrest and unwitnessed status were not associated with DGF. This focused analysis in an Australian population showed that the allograft outcomes were similar whether DCDD donors had experienced a prior cardiac arrest, with no associations between duration or unwitnessed status of arrest and risk of DGF. This study thus provides important reassurance to transplant programs and the patients they counsel, to accept kidneys from donors through the DCDD pathway irrespective of a prior cardiac arrest.

2-Step-Scores with optional nephropathology for the prediction of adverse outcomes for brain-dead donor kidneys in Eurotransplant.

The decision for acceptance or discard of the increasingly rare and marginal brain-dead donor kidneys in Eurotransplant (ET) countries has to be made without solid evidence. Thus, we developed and validated flexible clinicopathological scores called 2-Step Scores for the prognosis of delayed graft function (DGF) and one-year death-censored transplant loss (1y-tl) reflecting the current practice of six ET countries including Croatia and Belgium. The training set was n=620 for DGF and n=711 for 1y-tl, with validation sets n=158 and n=162. In step 1, stepwise logistic regression models including only clinical predictors were used to estimate the risks. In step 2, risk estimates were updated for statistically relevant intermediate risk percentiles with nephropathology. Step 1 revealed an increased risk of DGF with increased cold ischaemia time, donor and recipient BMI, dialysis vintage, number of HLA-DR mismatches or recipient CMV IgG positivity. On the training and validation set, c-statistics were 0.672 and 0.704, respectively. At a range between 18% and 36%, accuracy of DGF-prognostication improved with nephropathology including number of glomeruli and Banff cv (updated overall c statistics of 0.696 and 0.701, respectively).Risk of 1y-tl increased in recipients with cold ischaemia time, sum of HLA-A. -B, -DR mismatches and donor age. On training and validation sets, c-statistics were 0.700 and 0.769, respectively. Accuracy of 1y-tl prediction improved (c-statistics = 0.706 and 0.765) with Banff ct. Overall, calibration was good on the training, but moderate on the validation set; discrimination was at least as good as established scores when applied to the validation set. Our flexible 2-Step Scores with optional inclusion of time-consuming and often unavailable nephropathology should yield good results for clinical practice in ET, and may be superior to established scores. Our scores are adaptable to donation after cardiac death and perfusion pump use.

Cold Ischemia Time and Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation: A Paired Kidney Analysis.

We aimed to understand the association between cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation and the impact of organ pumping on that association. Retrospective cohort study using US registry data. We identified kidney pairs from the same donor where both kidneys were transplanted but had a CIT difference >0 and ≤20 h. We determined the frequency of concordant (both kidneys with/without DGF) or discordant (only 1 kidney DGF) DGF outcomes. Among discordant pairs, we computed unadjusted and adjusted relative risk of DGF associated with longer-CIT status, when then repeated this analysis restricted to pairs where only the longer-CIT kidney was pumped. Among 25 831 kidney pairs included, 71% had concordant DGF outcomes, 16% had only the longer-CIT kidney with DGF, and 13% had only the shorter-CIT kidney with DGF. Among discordant pairs, longer-CIT status was associated with a higher risk of DGF in unadjusted and adjusted models. Among pairs where only the longer-CIT kidney was pumped, longer-CIT kidneys that were pumped had a lower risk of DGF than their contralateral shorter-CIT kidneys that were not pumped regardless of the size of the CIT difference. Most kidney pairs have concordant DGF outcomes regardless of CIT difference, but even small increases in CIT raise the risk of DGF. Organ pumping may mitigate and even overcome the adverse consequences of prolonged CIT on the risk of DGF, but prospective studies are needed to better understand this relationship.

Pre-Transplant Hyperparathyroidism and Graft or Patient Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation.

The impact of pre-transplant parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels on early or long-term kidney function after kidney transplantation is subject of debate. We assessed whether severe hyperparathyroidism is associated with delayed graft function (DGF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), or all-cause mortality. In this single-center cohort study, we studied the relationship between PTH and other parameters related to bone and mineral metabolism, including serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at time of transplantation with the subsequent risk of DGF, DCGF and all-cause mortality using multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses. In 1,576 kidney transplant recipients (51.6 ± 14.0years, 57.3% male), severe hyperparathyroidism characterized by pre-transplant PTH ≥771pg/mL (>9 times the upper limit) was present in 121 patients. During 5.2 [0.2-30.0] years follow-up, 278 (15.7%) patients developed DGF, 150 (9.9%) DCGF and 432 (28.6%) died. A higher pre-transplant PTH was not associated with DGF (HR 1.06 [0.90-1.25]), DCGF (HR 0.98 [0.87-1.13]), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.02 [0.93-1.11]). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses. The same applied to other parameters related to bone and mineral metabolism, including ALP. Severe pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism was not associated with an increased risk of DGF, DCGF or all-cause mortality, not supporting the need of correction before kidney transplantation to improve graft or patient survival.

The impact of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: Results of a Brazilian nationwide multicenter study.

This study evaluated the current practices of selecting cold storage preservation solutions in Brazil and their impact on delayed graft function (DGF) incidence and 1-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 3,134 brain-dead deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 2014 and 2015 in 18 Brazilian centers. The most commonly used preservation solution was Euro-collins (EC, 55.4%), followed by Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK, 30%) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1, 14.6%). The incidence of DGF was 54.4%, with 11.7% of patients requiring dialysis for more than 14 days, indicating prolonged DGF. Upon adjusting for confounding variables, HTK demonstrated a significantly lower risk of DGF than EC (OR 0.7350.82500.926), as did IGL-1 (OR 0.6050.7120.837). Similar protective effects were observed for prolonged DGF when comparing HTK (OR 0.4780.5990.749) and IGL-1 (OR 0.4780.6810.749) against EC. No significant association was found between preservation solutions and 1-year death-censored graft survival. In conclusion, EC was the most frequently used cold storage perfusion solution, demonstrating a higher incidence and duration of DGF compared with HTK and IGL-1, but with no impact on 1-year graft survival.

Association Between First Post-operative Day Urine Output Following Kidney Transplantation and Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The relationship between post-operative urine output (UO) following kidney transplantation and long-term graft function has not been well described. In this study, we examined the association between decreased UO on post-operative day 1 (POD1) and post-transplant outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study. Atlantic Canada. Patients from the 4 Atlantic Canadian provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, and Prince Edward Island) who received a live or deceased donor kidney transplant from 2006 through 2019 through the multiorgan transplant program at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII) hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed the association of low POD1 UO (defined as ≤1000 mL) with death-censored graft loss (DCGL). In secondary analyses, we used adjusted logistic regression or Cox models as appropriate to assess the impact of UO on delayed graft function (DGF), prolonged length of stay (greater than the median for the entire cohort), and death. Of the 991 patients included, 151 (15.2%) had a UO ≤1000 mL on POD1. Low UO was independently associated with DCGL (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 95% CI = 1.55-10.32), DGF (odds ratio [OR] = 45.25, 95% CI = 23.00-89.02), and prolonged length of stay (OR = 5.06, 95% CI = 2.95-8.69), but not death (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.31-2.09). This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study and therefore has inherent limitations of generalizability, data collection, and residual confounding. Overall, reduced post-operative UO following kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of DCGL, DGF, and prolonged hospital length of stay.

The Impact of Hematological Indices on the Occurrence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF) of Transplanted Kidney.

to analyse the effect of haematological indices on the occurrence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF) in patients undergoing kidney transplantation and on the function of the transplanted kidney on the 7th postoperative day. 365 recipients who underwent kidney transplantation from a donor with known brain death between 2010 and 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Information from patient medical records, donor medical records, and donation and transplantation protocols was used for analysis. Statistica 13 was used for statistical analysis. In the study group, DGF occurred in 144 recipients (39.45%), and Non-Graft Function (NGF) occurred in 12 recipients (3.29%). Recipients who developed DGF had a significantly higher Neutrophil/Monocyte Ratio (NMR) before renal transplantation (p = 0.048), a lower NMR value on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), and a difference between the values on day 1 and before surgery (p < 0.001). In addition, they had a significantly lower Lymphocyte/Monocyte Ratio (LMR) on postoperative day 1 LMR 1 (p < 0.001). It was shown that the value of the indices based on the ROC curve-NMR1 > 29.29, NMR1-0 > 22.71, and LMR1 > 1.74 (respectively: AUC = 0.624; 95% CI 0.566-0.682; and p < 0.001/AUC = 0.622; 95% CI 0.563-0.680; and p < 0.001/AUC = 0.610; 95% CI 0.550-0.670; and p < 0.001)-can be used to identify recipients with a significant probability of DGF. the NMR and LMR parameters on the first postoperative day and the difference between the NMR values on the first post-transplant day and the first pre-transplant day are predictive factors associated with the risk of DGF.

Comprehensive analysis of necroptosis-related genes in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Oxidative stress is the primary cause of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in kidney transplantation, leading to delayed graft function (DGF) and implications on patient health. Necroptosis is believed to play a role in renal IRI. This research presents a comprehensive analysis of necroptosis-related genes and their functional implications in the context of IRI in renal transplantation. The necroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (NR-DEGs) were identified using gene expression data from pre- and post-reperfusion renal biopsies, and consensus clustering analysis was performed to distinguish necroptosis-related clusters. A predictive model for DGF was developed based on the NR-DEGs and patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups. We investigated the differences in functional enrichment and immune infiltration between different clusters and risk groups and further validated them in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Finally, we verified the expression changes of NR-DEGs in an IRI mouse model. Five NR-DEGs were identified and were involved in various biological processes. The renal samples were further stratified into two necroptosis-related clusters (C1 and C2) showing different occurrences of DGF. The predictive model had a reliable performance in identifying patients at higher risk of DGF with the area under the curve as 0.798. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis indicated more abundant proinflammatory cells in the high-risk group, which was also found in C2 cluster with more DGF patients. Validation of NR-DEG in scRNA-seq data further supported their involvement in immune cells. Lastly, the mouse model validated the up-regulation of NR-DEGs after IR and indicated the correlations with kidney function markers. Our research provides valuable insights into the identification and functional characterization of NR-DEGs in the context of renal transplantation and sheds light on their involvement in immune responses and the progression of IRI and DGF.

Impact of Extraction Time During Donation After Circulatory Death Organ Procurement on Kidney Function After Transplantation in The Netherlands.

In The Netherlands, 60% of deceased-donor kidney offers are after donation after circulatory death. Cold and warm ischemia times are known risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) and inferior allograft survival. Extraction time is a relatively new ischemia time. During procurement, cooling of the kidneys is suboptimal with ongoing ischemia. However, evidence is lacking on whether extraction time has an impact on DGF if all ischemic periods are included. Between 2012 and 2018, 1524 donation after circulatory death kidneys were procured and transplanted in The Netherlands. Donation and transplantation-related data were obtained from the database of the Dutch Transplant Foundation. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of DGF. In our cohort, extraction time ranged from 14 to 237 min, with a mean of 62 min (SD 32). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, extraction time was an independent risk factor for incidence of DGF (odds ratio per minute increase 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.013; P = 0.001). The agonal phase, hypoperfusion time, and anastomosis time were not independent risk factors for incidence of DGF. Considering all known ischemic periods during the donation after the circulatory death process, prolonged kidney extraction time increased the risk of DGF after kidney transplantation.

Transplant Outcomes After Exposure of Deceased Kidney Donors to Contrast Medium.

The administration of contrast medium is associated with acute kidney injury; however, the effect of exposure of a deceased organ donor to contrast medium on kidney transplant outcomes has been poorly studied. A retrospective analysis of all deceased kidney donors between 2011 and 2021 and their corresponding recipients in the Netherlands was conducted. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the associations between contrast medium exposure and delayed graft function (DGF)/graft survival. Linear mixed models were used to assess the differences in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate values in recipients 1 to 6 y after transplantation. In total, 2177 donors and 3638 corresponding kidney graft recipients were included. Twenty-four percent of the donors (n = 520) were exposed to contrast medium, corresponding to 23% of recipients (n = 832). DGF was observed in 36% (n = 1321) and primary nonfunction in 3% (n = 122) of recipients. DGF rates for donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors showed no significant effect of contrast medium exposure (P = 0.15 and P = 0.60 for DBD and DCD donors, respectively). In multivariable analyses, contrast medium administration was not significantly associated with a higher DGF risk (odds ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.36; P = 0.63) nor was a significant predictor for death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.33; P = 0.93). Linear mixed models showed no difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate values in recipients 1 to 6 y posttransplantation (P = 0.78). This study indicates that contrast medium administration in DBD and DCD donors has no negative effect on early and long-term kidney graft function.

Choosing fluids to reduce the risk of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation, defined clinically as the need for at least one dialysis session within the first week after transplantation, is a common occurrence. 1 Swanson KJ Bhattarai M Parajuli S Delayed graft function: current status and future directions. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023; 28: 1-7 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Use of organs that are predisposed to DGF is increasing, 2 NHS Blood and TransplantOrgan and tissue donation and transplantation. Activity Report 2021/22. nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/27108/activity-report-2021-2022.pdfDate accessed: March 23, 2023 Google Scholar meaning it is important to consider the clinical sequelae of DGF. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of 38 studies, 3 Li MT Ramakrishnan A Yu M et al. Effects of delayed graft function on transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis. Transplant Direct. 2023; 9: e1433 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar DGF was associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes, including risk for rejection, graft failure, and (in single-centre studies only) all-cause mortality. Some studies suggest the duration of DGF is more important than its occurrence. 4 Schrezenmeier E Müller M Friedersdorff F et al. Evaluation of severity of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022; 37: 973-981 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar However, any DGF has a real-world impact on patients and can influence decision making for clinicians. For example, a third of North American transplant professionals indicated in a survey that the risk of DGF had a role in their willingness to accept organs, 5 Jadlowiec CC Hippen B Gill J et al. Current opinions on DGF management practices: a survey of the United States and Canada. Clin Transplant. 2023; 37: e14949 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar and strategies to reduce DGF are a clinical priority. A simple intervention to reduce DGF might relate to optimising intravenous fluid replacement. Isotonic sodium chloride (0·9% saline) is the standard of care in many transplantation units. However, 0·9% saline might be harmful due to its high chloride content, which causes metabolic acidosis and can promote acute kidney injury, thus DGF. 6 Yunos NM Bellomo R Hegarty C Story D Ho L Bailey M Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1566-1572 Crossref PubMed Scopus (844) Google Scholar Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trialAmong patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Full-Text PDF

Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major adverse complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Intravenous fluids are routinely given to patients receiving a transplant to maintain intravascular volume and optimise graft function. Saline (0·9% sodium chloride) is widely used but might increase the risk of DGF due to its high chloride content. We aimed to test our hypothesis that using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce the incidence of DGF. BEST-Fluids was a pragmatic, registry-embedded, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial at 16 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adults and children of any age receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant were eligible; those receiving a multi-organ transplant or weighing less than 20 kg were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an adaptive minimisation algorithm to intravenous balanced crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) or saline during surgery and up until 48 h after transplantation. Trial fluids were supplied in identical bags and clinicians determined the fluid volume, rate, and time of discontinuation. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as receiving dialysis within 7 days after transplantation. All participants who consented and received a transplant were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned eligible participants who commenced surgery and received trial fluids, whether or not they received a transplant. This study is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, (ACTRN12617000358347), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03829488). Between Jan 26, 2018, and Aug 10, 2020, 808 participants were randomly assigned to balanced crystalloid (n=404) or saline (n=404) and received a transplant (512 [63%] were male and 296 [37%] were female). One participant in the saline group withdrew before 7 days and was excluded, leaving 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group and 403 in the saline group that were included in the primary analysis. DGF occurred in 121 (30%) of 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus 160 (40%) of 403 in the saline group (adjusted relative risk 0·74 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·84; p<0·0001]; adjusted risk difference 10·1% [95% CI 3·5 to 16·6]). In the safety analysis, numbers of investigator-reported serious adverse events were similar in both groups, being reported in three (<1%) of 406 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus five (1%) of 409 participants in the saline group (adjusted risk difference -0·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 0·9; p=0·48). Among patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Medical Research Future Fund and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Health Research Council (New Zealand), Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Baxter.

Obesity is Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Paired Kidney Analysis.

Obesity is increasingly prevalent among candidates for kidney transplantation. Existing studies have shown conflicting post-transplant outcomes for obese patients which may relate to confounding bias from donor-related characteristics that were unaccounted for. We used ANZDATA Registry data to compare graft and patient survival between obese (BMI >27.5kg/m2 Asians; >30kg/m2 non-Asians) and non-obese kidney transplant recipients, while controlling for donor characteristics by comparing recipients of paired kidneys. We selected transplant pairs (2000-2020) where a deceased donor supplied one kidney to an obese candidate and the other to a non-obese candidate. We compared the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), graft failure and death by multivariable models. We identified 1,522 pairs. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of DGF (aRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44, p < 0.001). Obese recipients were more likely to experience death-censored graft failure (aHR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49, p = 0.012), and more likely to die with function (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p = 0.001), versus non-obese recipients. Long-term patient survival was significantly worse in obese patients with 10- and 15-year survival of 71% and 56% compared to 77% and 63% in non-obese patients. Addressing obesity is an unmet clinical need in kidney transplantation.

Patterns in Use and Transplant Outcomes Among Adult Recipients of Kidneys From Deceased Donors With COVID-19

While the COVID-19 pandemic enters a new phase and the proportion of individuals with a previous COVID-19 diagnosis increases, the national patterns in kidney use and medium-term kidney transplant (KT) outcomes among patients receiving kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors remain unknown. To evaluate the patterns in kidney use and KT outcomes among adult recipients of kidneys from deceased donors with active or resolved COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using national US transplant registry data from 35 851 deceased donors (71 334 kidneys) and 45 912 adult patients who received KTs from March 1, 2020, to March 30, 2023. The exposure was donor SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) results, with positive NAT results within 7 days before procurement defined as active COVID-19 and positive NAT results 1 week (>7 days) before procurement defined as resolved COVID-19. Primary outcomes were kidney nonuse, all-cause kidney graft failure, and all-cause patient death. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection (ie, rejection in the first 6 months after KT), transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS), and delayed graft function (DGF). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for kidney nonuse, rejection, and DGF; multivariable linear regression analyses were performed for LOS; and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for graft failure and all-cause death. All models were adjusted for inverse probability treatment weighting. Among 35 851 deceased donors, the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (15.3) years; 22 319 (62.3%) were men and 23 992 (66.9%) were White. Among 45 912 recipients, the mean (SD) age was 54.3 (13.2) years; 27 952 (60.9%) were men and 15 349 (33.4%) were Black. The likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time. Overall, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76) and kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.48) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from COVID-19-negative donors. From 2020 to 2022, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (2020: AOR, 11.26 [95% CI, 2.29-55.38]; 2021: AOR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.58-2.79]; 2022: AOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.28-1.70]) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from donors without COVID-19. Kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors had a higher likelihood of nonuse in 2020 (AOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.26-11.90) and 2021 (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.45) but not in 2022 (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28). In 2023, kidneys from both active COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.75-1.63) and resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80-1.73) were not associated with higher odds of nonuse. No higher risk of graft failure or death was found in patients receiving kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78-1.37]; patient death: AHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.84-1.66]) or resolved COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: AHR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88-1.39]; patient death: AHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.70-1.28]). Donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with longer LOS, higher risk of acute rejection, or higher risk of DGF. In this cohort study, the likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time, and donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with worse KT outcomes within 2 years after transplant. These findings suggest that the use of kidneys from donors with active or resolved COVID-19 is safe in the medium term; further research is needed to assess longer-term transplant outcomes.

A non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 genetic variant is associated with graft failure following kidney transplantation.

Despite current matching efforts to identify optimal donor-recipient pairs for kidney transplantation, alloimmunity remains a major source of late transplant failure. Additional genetic parameters in donor-recipient matching could help improve longterm outcomes. Here, we studied the impact of a non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) polymorphism on allograft failure. We conducted an observational cohort study, analyzing the DNA of 1,271 kidney donor-recipient transplant pairs from a single academic hospital for the MYH9 rs11089788 C&gt;A polymorphism. The associations of the MYH9 genotype with risk of graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and delayed graft function (DGF) were estimated. A trend was seen in the association between the MYH9 polymorphism in the recipient and graft failure (recessive model, p = 0.056), but not for the MYH9 polymorphism in the donor. The AA-genotype MYH9 polymorphism in recipients was associated with higher risk of DGF (p = 0.03) and BPAR (p = 0.021), although significance was lost after adjusting for covariates (p = 0.15 and p = 0.10, respectively). The combined presence of the MYH9 polymorphism in donor-recipient pairs was associated with poor long-term kidney allograft survival (p = 0.04), in which recipients with an AA genotype receiving a graft with an AA genotype had the worst outcomes. After adjustment, this combined genotype remained significantly associated with 15-year death-censored kidney graft survival (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.70; p = 0.03). Our results reveal that recipients with an AA-genotype MYH9 polymorphism receiving a donor kidney with an AA genotype have significantly elevated risk of graft failure after kidney transplantation.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: Are the Concerns Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Renal transplantation improves quality of life and prolongs survival in patients with end-stage kidney disease, although challenges exist due to the paucity of suitable donor organs. This has been addressed by expanding the donor pool to include AKI kidneys. We aimed to establish whether transplanting such kidneys had a detrimental effect on graft outcome. The primary aim was to define early outcomes: delayed graft function (DGF) and primary non-function (PNF). The secondary aims were to define the relationship to acute rejection, allograft survival, eGFR and length of hospital stay (LOS). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted on the studies reporting the above outcomes from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. This analysis included 30 studies. There is a higher risk of DGF in the AKI group (OR = 2.20, p < 0.00001). There is no difference in the risk for PNF (OR 0.99, p = 0.98), acute rejection (OR 1.29, p = 0.08), eGFR decline (p = 0.05) and prolonged LOS (p = 0.11). The odds of allograft survival are similar (OR 0.95, p = 0.54). Transplanting kidneys from donors with AKI can lead to satisfactory outcomes. This is an underutilised resource which can address organ demand.

Intercontinental Deceased-donor Kidney Transplantation in Dutch Antilleans: Favorable Outcomes Despite Prolonged Ischemia.

Intercontinental Deceased-donor Kidney Transplantation in Dutch Antilleans: Favorable Outcomes Despite Prolonged Ischemia.