Degree Of Esophageal Dilatation Research Articles

Toupet fundoplication to prevent progression of scleroderma-associated interstitial lung damage: a study protocol

Summary Background Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune and multiorgan disorder. Hallmarks of the disease include inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and dysregulation of fibroblasts leading to fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The esophagus is often involved, with up to 80% of patients developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Reflux can be associated with hiatal hernia and several complications such as erosive esophagitis, peptic stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, aspiration pneumonia, and chronic microaspiration. Silent aspiration can lead to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in up to 50% of patients with scleroderma and accounts for up to 40% of mortality. Treatment of GERD in patients with SSc is challenging. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been shown effective in relieving typical GERD symptoms, but up to 40% of patients are non-responders. Various antireflux surgical procedures have been proposed to treat GERD and to modify the natural course of the disease by preventing lung damage in these patients. However, current algorithms consider only the degree of esophageal dilation as a marker of disease severity/progression, and results of antireflux surgery remain controversial. Methods We propose a feasibility, observational, multicenter, single-arm trial including adult patients diagnosed with SSc. Criteria for inclusion are individuals with GERD symptoms refractory to PPI, absence of peptic stricture at baseline endoscopy, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan showing no or less than 10% lung fibrosis, forced vital capacity at least 40% of the predicted value, and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide 30–89% of the predicted value. A laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication according to the Toupet technique will be performed. Primary study outcome is the efficacy of fundoplication to reduce reflux exposure measured with a pH-impedance study or 4‑day wireless pH recording. Secondary outcomes include endoscopic, HRCT, and respiratory function tests findings as well as quality of life at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions The expected reduction of reflux burden in SSc patients selected for Toupet fundoplication may improve GERD symptoms/complications, pulmonary function, and quality of life, and may be associated with a reduced risk for lung transplant.

Esophageal transit time in patients with chagasic megaesophagus: Lack of linear correlation between dysphagia and grade of dilatation.

The aim of this study was to determine the esophageal transit time in control individuals and in chagasic patients with or without megaesophagus.A total of 148 patients were allocated in 6 groups according to serological diagnostic of Chagas disease and the degree of esophageal dilatation: A, control healthy individuals (n = 34, 22.9%); B, indeterminate form (n = 23, 15.5%); C, megaesophagus I (n = 37, 25.0%); D, megaesophagus II (n = 19, 12.8%); E, megaesophagus III (n = 21, 14.2%); and F, megaesophagus IV (n = 14, 9.5%). After 8-hour fasting, patients were asked to swallow 75 mL of barium sulfate solution. x-Rays were obtained after 8, 30, 60, and 90 seconds, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 minutes, 2, 6, 12, 24 hours, and at every 12 hours until no more contrast was seen in the esophagus. This was the transit time.The transit time varied from 8 seconds to 36 hours (median = 90 seconds). A linear correlation was observed between transit time and megaesophagus grade: 8 seconds in groups A and B, 5 minutes in C, 30 minutes in D, 2 hours in E, and 9:15 hours in F. Dysphagia was not reported by 60 of 114 (52.6%) patients with positive serological tests for Chagas disease (37/91—40.7%—of patients with megaesophagus I–IV grades). The esophageal transit time increased with the grade of megaesophagus.The esophageal transit time has a direct correlation with the grade of megaesophagus; dysphagia complaint correlates with the grade of megaesophagus. However, many patients with megaesophagus do not report dysphagia.

The relationship between manometric subtype and outcomes of surgical treatment for patients with achalasia : Achalasia: manometric subtypes.

The Chicago Classification describes three distinct subtypes of achalasia and it appears to be a promising tool in predicting results of treatment with standard Heller Myotomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment for achalasia using an extended Heller myotomy for each subtype and to identify additional parameters that may predict the success of therapy. 72 consecutive patients with achalasia were evaluated at the University of Washington between 2008 and 2013. Symptom duration, patient age, and the degree of esophageal dilation (stage 1-3) as assessed by radiography were determined. We defined treatment failure as no improvement in symptoms and/or need for a second therapy within 1year. Long-term follow-up data of 25 patients were available in the form of a survey evaluating overall satisfaction with the operation. The distribution of patients according to subtype included 13 with type I, 54 with type II, and 5 with type III. All of the type I patients had some degree of esophageal dilation on radiography, whereas no dilation was found in the type III group. All patients underwent uneventful laparoscopic-extended Heller myotomy. Two patients were classified as failures, including one with type I and one with type II achalasia; however, further investigation revealed the cause of both failures to be the development of peptic stricture. Only one of the 25 patients with long-term follow-up reported dissatisfaction with the treatment result and indicated persistent chest pain without dysphagia. Laparoscopic-extended Heller myotomy is a highly successful treatment for patients with achalasia and outcomes do not appear to vary significantly according to the manometric subtype. Failures may result from reflux in patients who develop esophagitis or stricture. Chest pain is not always responsive to esophagogastric myotomy despite relief of dysphagia.

High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motility in Patients with Achalasia

The motility of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is still poorly understood. It is also unclear if the motility of this area may be compromised in patients with achalasia. This study aims to evaluate the motility of the pharynx, UES, and proximal esophagus in patients with esophageal achalasia. Sixty patients with achalasia underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) (52 % females, mean age 54 years). Esophageal dilatation was classified according to the radiologic diameter in Type I (<4 cm): 6 %; Type II (4–7 cm): 36 %; Type III (7–10 cm): 34 %; and Type IV (>10 cm): 24 %. HRM classified 43 % of the patients as Chicago Type I and 57 % as Type II. Manometric parameters were compared to normal values obtained from a previous study in volunteers. The motility of the velopharynx showed short, premature, and hypertonic contraction. The epiglottis also showed hypertonic contraction. The UES had increased residual pressure. Chicago classification Type II patients had higher UES residual pressure (p = 0.03). The degree of esophageal dilatation did not correlate with manometric parameters. Achalasia may affect the motility of the pharyngo-upper esophageal area. The changes observed may represent functional alterations to prevent aspiration, especially in patients with Chicago classification Type II achalasia.

Achalasia: a systematic review.

Achalasia significantly affects patients' quality of life and can be difficult to diagnose and treat. To review the diagnosis and management of achalasia, with a focus on phenotypic classification pertinent to therapeutic outcomes. Literature review and MEDLINE search of articles from January 2004 to February 2015. A total of 93 articles were included in the final literature review addressing facets of achalasia epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials focusing on endoscopic or surgical therapy for achalasia were included (734 total patients). A diagnosis of achalasia should be considered when patients present with dysphagia, chest pain, and refractory reflux symptoms after an endoscopy does not reveal a mechanical obstruction or an inflammatory cause of esophageal symptoms. Manometry should be performed if achalasia is suspected. Randomized controlled trials support treatments focused on disrupting the lower esophageal sphincter with pneumatic dilation (70%-90% effective) or laparoscopic myotomy (88%-95% effective). Patients with achalasia have a variable prognosis after endoscopic or surgical myotomy based on subtypes, with type II (absent peristalsis with abnormal pan-esophageal high-pressure patterns) having a very favorable outcome (96%) and type I (absent peristalsis without abnormal pressure) having an intermediate prognosis (81%) that is inversely associated with the degree of esophageal dilatation. In contrast, type III (absent peristalsis with distal esophageal spastic contractions) is a spastic variant with less favorable outcomes (66%) after treatment of the lower esophageal sphincter. Achalasia should be considered when dysphagia is present and not explained by an obstruction or inflammatory process. Responses to treatment vary based on which achalasia subtype is present.

Mo1598 Do Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Achalasia Depend on the Manometric Subtype?

Background: High Resolution Manometry (HRM) yields better understanding of esophageal motility than does conventional manometry, and a new classification system which describes three distinct HRM subtypes of achalasia based on esophageal body contraction patterns appears to be a promising tool in predicting results of treatment with standard Heller Myotomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment with extended Heller myotomy) for each subtype and to identify additional parameters that may predict success of therapy. Methods: From 2008 to 2013 at a single institution 72 patients underwent laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy for first time. In addition to manometric parameters, clinical records were reviewed for symptom duration, patient age at the time of referral, and preoperative esophageal dilation (stage I-III) as assessed by radiography. We defined treatment failure as no improvement in symptoms and/or need for a second therapy within one year after the operation. Long term follow up data (15 to 46 months) was available for a subset of 25 patients in the form of a survey evaluating overall satisfaction with the operation. Results: The 72myotomy patients included 11 with type I (no contractions), 56 with type II (pan-esophageal pressurizations), and 5 with type III (high-amplitude distal spasm). Failure was found in 1 patient with manometric type I and radiologic stage III esophageal dilation, 1 patient with manometric type II and radiologic stage II esophageal dilation, and none with manometric type III. All of the type I patients had at least some degree of esophageal dilation on radiography, whereas no dilation was found in the type III group. Treatment failure was not observed in any of the patients under 50 years old (n= 35) nor in any patients with stage I esophageal dilation. Only one of the 25 patients with long term follow up reported dissatisfaction with the treatment result; this patient had type II achalasia on HRM and esophageal dilation was stage I. Conclusions: Overall, laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy is a highly successful treatment for patients with achalasia, and outcomes do not appear to vary significantly according to HRM subtypes. Stage I esophageal dilation and age below 50 may be better indicators of consistent symptom relief after surgical therapy for this disease.

Tu1983 Correlation of Esophageal Diameter With Manometric Parameters in Subtypes of Achalasia Patients

Background: It was commonly thought that significantly dilated esophagus in Achalasia is associated with prolonged disease process. Comparing to type II Achalasia, type I diagnosed by manometry is thought to be a later stage achalasia which is less responsive to the treatment. Objective: To compare the esophageal diameter in different subtypes of achalasia based on High Resolution Impedance Manometry (HRIM) and therefore to further determine the clinical significance of this radiographic parameter. Method: Data of HRIM findings and esophagram of 71 Achalasia patients were retrospectively analyzed. Following parameters were obtained: height of the bolus column based on impedance recordings, lower esophageal sphincter residual pressure i.e. integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), and pan-esophageal pressure in supine and upright positions. The largest esophageal diameter was measured above esophagogastric (EG) junction on anteroposterior (AP) view of esophogram images. The patients were separated into 3 groups based on diameter of the esophagus as 8cm. The above manometric findings were compared with esophageal diameter. Esophageal diameter was also compared in different subtypes of Achalasia. Results: Thirty three out of 71 Achalasia patients with available esophogram were studied (M:F 15:18, age range 20-88 years; mean 58.6). Of these 33 patients, 6 patients were type I, 20 were type II, and 5 were type III Achalasia based on Chicago classification. Two patients were labeled as unclassified Achalasia due to presence of segmental peristalsis. Unexpectedly, Achalasia patients with wider esophageal diameter were more commonly seen in type II Achalasia rather than type I Achalasia as shown in table 1. 16 out of 20 type II Achalasia patients (80%) had dilated esophagus ≥ 5cm; comparing to 3 out of 6 type I patients (50%), and 1 out of 5 type III patients (20%) who had dilated esophagus of ≥ 5cm. There was no statistically significant correlation between esophageal diameter and LES residual pressure and pan esophageal pressures in both supine and upright swallows. However, the bolus height as determined by HRIM in upright position was associated with wider esophageal diameter on barium esophagram with correlation factor of 0.387 (P=0.07). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that wider esophageal diameter was associated with greater height of the bolus column in the upright position. Type II Achalasia patients are more commonly seen with larger esophageal diameter than other types. Since type II Achalasia responds to treatment better than other types, the degree of esophageal dilatation may not be a reliable prognosis predictor for Achalasia patients. Table 1. Correlation of esophageal diameter with subtypes of Achalasia

High-Resolution Manometry Classifications for Idiopathic Achalasia in Patients with Chagas' Disease Esophagopathy

BackgroundIdiopathic achalasia (IA) and Chagas' disease esophagopathy (CDE) share several similarities. The comparison between IA and CDE is important to evaluate whether treatment options and their results can be accepted universally. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has proved a better diagnostic tool compared to conventional manometry. This study aims to evaluate HRM classifications for idiopathic achalasia in patients with CDE. MethodsWe studied 98 patients: 52 patients with CDE (52 % females, mean age, 57 ± 14 years) and 46 patients with IA (54 % females; mean age 48 ± 19 years). All patients underwent a HRM and barium esophagogram. ResultsThe Chicago classification was distributed in IA as Chicago I, 35 %; Chicago II, 63 %; and Chicago III, 2 %, and in CDE as Chicago I, 52 %; Chicago II, 48 %; and Chicago III, 0 % (p = 0.1, 0.1, and 0.5, respectively). All patients had the classic Rochester type. CDE patients had more pronounced degrees of esophageal dilatation (p < 0.002). The degree of esophageal dilatation did not correlate with Chicago classification (p = 0.08). In nine (9 %) patients, the HRM pattern changed during the test from Chicago I to II. ConclusionOur results show that (a) HRM classifications for IA can be applied in patients with CDE and (b) HRM classifications did not correlate with the degree of esophageal dilatation. HRM classifications may reflect esophageal repletion and pressurization instead of muscular contraction. The correlation between manometric findings and treatment outcomes for CDE needs to be answered in the near future.

Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients?

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the esophagus, characterized by the absence of peristalsis and impaired swallow-induced relaxation. In the past decade, evidence has been accumulated suggesting that achalasia may be an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has slowly shifted the treatment of achalasia toward the greater use of surgical therapy. The goal of both surgical and nonsurgical treatment is to eliminate the outflow obstruction afforded by a nonrelaxing sphincter, relieving dysphagia and maintaining a barrier against gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Endoscopic botulinum toxin injection (EBTI) is safe, easy to perform, inexpensive, and effective in aged patients, and it is especially effective when the lower esophageal pressure is hypertonic. This therapeutic option is reserved for patients too ill to undergo any surgical procedure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) has been shown to be an effective and inexpensive treatment with few adverse effects. The long-term success rate of PD seems to drop progressively over time. Heller myotomy (HM) has shown the best clinical efficacy in achalasia as a first-line treatment. Multiple endoscopic treatments are associated with poorer outcomes after HM. EBTI also makes LHM more difficult and results in a worse surgical outcome. The inferior symptomatic outcomes after thoracoscopic HM may be caused by the difficulty in extending an adequate myotomy onto the stomach from the chest and the inability to create a fundoplication. LHM with Dor's fundoplication (LHM + Dor) is effective and is safer procedure for avoiding GER, dysphagia, mucosal perforation, and a pseudodiverticulum. LHM + Dor is also effective in the presence of sigmoid achalasia, but the clinical result is not as good as nonsigmoid achalasia. A few patients need esophagectomy for surgical failure of HM. However, considering the risk of esophagectomy, LHM + Dor is the first treatment option for patients with achalasia regardless of the degree of esophageal dilatation. This procedure is therefore considered to be an effective and safe treatment for patients of any age or with any condition.

Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age

BackgroundThe effectiveness of an esophagomyotomy for dysphagia in elderly patients with achalasia has been questioned. This study was designed to provide an answer.MethodsA total of 162 consecutive patients with achalasia who had a laparoscopic myotomy and Dor fundoplication and who were available for follow-up interview were divided by age: <60 years (range, 14–59; 118 patients), and ≥60 years (range, 60–93; 44 patients). Primary outcome measures were severity of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and chest pain before and after the operation as assessed on a four-point Likert scale, and the need for postoperative dilatation or revisional surgery.ResultsFollow-up averaged 64 months. Older patients had less dysphagia (mean score 3.6 vs. 3.9; P < 0.01) and less chest pain (1.0 vs. 1.8; P < 0.01). Regurgitation (3.0 vs. 3.2; P = not significant (NS)) and heartburn (1.6 vs. 2.0, P = NS) were similar. Older patients were no different in degree of esophageal dilation, manometric findings, number of previous pneumatic dilatations, or previous botulinum toxin therapy. None of the older patients had previously had an esophagomyotomy, whereas 14% of younger patients had (P < 0.01).After laparoscopic myotomy, older patients had better relief of dysphagia (mean score 1.0 vs 1.6; P < 0.01), less heartburn (0.8 vs. 1.1; P = 0.03), and less chest pain (0.2 vs. 0.8, P < 0.01). Complication rates were similar. Older patients did not require more postoperative dilatations (22 patients vs. 10 patients; P = 0.7) or revisional surgery for recurrent or persistent symptoms (3 vs. 1 patients; P = 0.6). Satisfaction scores did not differ, and more than 90% of patients in both groups said in retrospect they would have undergone the procedure if they had known beforehand how it would turn out.ConclusionsThis retrospective review with long follow-up supports laparoscopic esophagomyotomy as first-line therapy in older patients with achalasia. They appeared to benefit even more than younger patients.

Usefulness of the Laparoscopic Heller-Dor Operation for Esophageal Achalasia: Introducing the Procedure to Our Institution

Our institution introduced laparoscopic surgery for esophageal achalasia in 2001. The present report summarizes 15 cases of achalasia treated with laparoscopic Heller myotomy and anterior fundoplication according to the method of Dor, and we have investigated the therapeutic effects on specific symptoms such as dysphagia, reflux, and chest pain. From February 2001 through January 2007, the laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation was performed in 15 patients, including 7 men and 8 women. Achalasia was classified morphologically on esophagography as spindle type in 11 cases, flask type in 3 cases and sigmoid type in 1 case. The degree of esophageal dilatation was classified as grade I in 8 cases, grade II in 6 cases, and grade III in 1 case. Dysphagia was the main symptom and was present in all cases. The mean disease duration was 4.3 years (range, 5 months to 20 years), and the mean weight loss was 4.2 kg. All patients underwent endoscopic dilatation preoperatively. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 0 to 100 mL (mean, 21 mL). Adequate Heller myotomy was considered more than 6 cm and more than 3 cm in the esophagus and the stomach, respectively. Injury to the esophageal mucosa occurred during the myotomy in 3 cases but could be repaired in all cases during the laparoscopic procedure. All patients reported an excellent level of satisfaction postoperatively. In conclusion, the laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for esophageal achalasia is a useful procedure because the postoperative satisfaction level of patients is excellent. Despite the risk of mucosal injury, adequate Heller myotomy should be achieved to obtain a good prognosis. It is, therefore, of utmost importance to obtain mastery over the surgical technique to repair any mucosal injury that might occur.

The Outcome of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia is Not Influenced by the Degree of Esophageal Dilatation

In the past, a Heller myotomy was considered to be ineffective in patients with achalasia and a markedly dilated or sigmoid-shaped esophagus. Esophagectomy was the standard treatment. The aims of this study were (a) to evaluate the results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication in patients with achalasia and various degrees of esophageal dilatation; and (b) to assess the role of endoscopic dilatation in patients with postoperative dysphagia. One hundred and thirteen patients with esophageal achalasia were separated into four groups based on the maximal diameter of the esophageal lumen and the shape of the esophagus: group A, diameter <4.0 cm, 46 patients; group B, esophageal diameter 4.0–6.0 cm, 32 patients; group C, diameter >6.0 cm and straight axis, 23 patients; and group D, diameter >6.0 cm and sigmoid-shaped esophagus, 12 patients. All had a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. The median length of follow-up was 45 months (range 7 months to 12.5 years). The postoperative recovery was similar among the four groups. Twenty-three patients (20%) had postoperative dilatations for dysphagia, and five patients (4%) required a second myotomy. Excellent or good results were obtained in 89% of group A and 91% of groups B, C, and D. None required an esophagectomy to maintain clinically adequate swallowing. These data show that (a) a laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieved dysphagia in most patients with achalasia, even when the esophagus was dilated; (b) about 20% of patients required additional treatment; (c) in the end, swallowing was good in 90%.

Surgical risk for patients with Chagasic achalasia and its correlation with the degree of esophageal dilation

To analyze the risk of cardiovascular complications in patients with indication for surgical treatment of Chagasic esophageal achalasia and to correlate the surgical risks with the degree of esophageal dilation, thereby proposing a risk scale index. One hundred and twenty-four patients with Chagasic esophageal achalasia, who received surgical treatment at the Hospital das Clinicas of the Federal University of Goias, were included in this study. The patients were mostly related to the postoperative complications due to the cardiovascular system. All the patients were submitted to: (1) clinical history to define the cardiac functional class (New York Heart Association); (2) conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram at rest; and (3) contrast imaging of the esophagus to determine esophageal dilatation according to Rezende's classification of Chagasic megaesophagus. An assessment of the functional classification (FC) of heart failure during the preoperative period determined that 67 patients (54.03%) were assigned functional class I (FC I), 46 patients (37.09%) were assigned functional class II (FC II), and 11 patients (8.87%) were assigned functional class III (FC III). None of the patients were assigned to functional class IV (FC IV). There was a positive correlation between the functional class and the postoperative complications (FC IXFC II: P<0.001; FC IXFC III: P<0.001). The ECG was normal in 44 patients (35.48%) and presented abnormalities in 80 patients (64.52%). There was a significant statistical correlation between abnormal ECG (arrhythmias and primary change in ventricular repolarization) and postoperative complications (P<0.001). With regard to the classification of the Chagasic esophageal achalasia, the following distribution was observed: group II, 53 patients (42.74%); group III, 37 patients (29.83%); and group IV, 34 patients (27.41%). There was a positive correlation between the degree of esophageal dilation and the increase in postoperative complications (grade IIXgrade III achalasia: P<0.001; grade IIXgrade IV achalasia: P<0.001; and grade IIIXgrade IV achalasia: P = 0.017). Analyzing these results and using a multivariate regression analysis associated with the probability decision analysis, a risk scale was proposed as follows: up to 21 points (mild risk); from 22 to 34 points (moderate risk); and more than 34 points (high risk). The scale had 82.4% accuracy for mild risk patients and up to 94.6% for the high risk cases. The preoperative evaluation of the cardiovascular system, through a careful anamnesis, an ECG and contrast imaging of the esophagus, makes possible to estimate the surgical risks for Chagas' disease patients who have to undergo surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia.

CT Evaluation of Achalasia

A retrospective review of CT scans on patients referred with either a definitive or a tentative diagnosis of achalasia was undertaken. Twelve patients were identified, of whom nine had proven achalasia. The remaining three patients were later definitively diagnosed with pseudoachalasia, benign stricture, and leiomyomatosis, respectively. Findings in all nine achalasia patients were similar: moderate to marked esophageal dilatation (mean diameter 4.35 cm at carinal level) with normal wall thickness. Findings are in distinct contrast to the three patients with other diseases, in which the degree of esophageal dilatation and/or wall thickness was atypical. Complications in the patients with proven achalasia included secondary carcinoma (one), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (one), and pulmonary aspiration (three). Computed tomography may not be indicated as a routine study, but in complicated cases CT may be invaluable in confirming the diagnosis or in detecting atypical features that may indicate the presence of other diseases or superimposed benign or malignant processes.