Degenerative Medial Meniscus Tear Research Articles

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for a Degenerative Meniscus Tear Is Not Cost Effective Compared With Placebo Surgery: An Economic Evaluation Based on the FIDELITY Trial Data.

In patients with a degenerative tear of the medial meniscus, recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown no treatment benefit of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) over conservative treatment or placebo surgery. Yet, advocates of APM still argue that APM is cost effective. Giving advocates of APM their due, we note that there is evidence from the treatment of other musculoskeletal complaints to suggest that a treatment may prove cost effective even in the absence of improvements in efficacy outcomes, as it may lead to other benefits, such as diminished productivity loss and reduced costs, and so the question of cost effectiveness needs to be answered for APM. (1) Does APM result in lower postoperative costs compared with placebo surgery? (2) Is APM cost-effective compared with placebo surgery? One hundred forty-six adults aged 35 to 65 years with knee symptoms consistent with a degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria were randomized to APM (n = 70) or placebo surgery (n = 76). In the APM and placebo surgery groups, mean age was 52 ± 7 years and 52 ± 7 years, and 60% (42 of 70) and 62% (47 of 76) of participants were men, respectively. There were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics. In both groups, a standard diagnostic arthroscopy was first performed. Thereafter, in the APM group, the torn meniscus was trimmed to solid meniscus tissue, whereas in the placebo surgery group, APM was carefully mimicked but no resection of meniscal tissue was performed; as such, surgical costs were the same in both arms and were not included in the analyses. All patients received identical postoperative care including a graduated home-based exercise program. At the 2-year follow-up, two patients were lost to follow-up, both in the placebo surgery group. Cost effectiveness over the 2-year trial period was computed as incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) for improvements in quality-adjusted life years (QALY), using both the societal (primary) and healthcare system (secondary) perspectives. To be able to consider APM cost effective, the CEA analysis should yield a positive INMB value. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to assess uncertainty. Several one-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. APM did not deliver lower postoperative costs, nor did it convincingly improve quality of life scores when compared with placebo surgery. From a societal perspective, APM was associated with € 971 (95% CI -2013 to 4017) higher costs and 0.015 (95% CI -0.011 to 0.041) improved QALYs over 2-year follow-up compared with placebo surgery. Both differences were statistically inconclusive (a wide 95% CI that crossed the line of no difference). Using the conventional willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of € 35,000 per QALY, APM resulted in a negative INMB of € -460 (95% CI -3757 to 2698). In our analysis, APM would result in a positive INMB only when the WTP threshold rises to about € 65,000 per QALY. The wide 95% CIs suggests uncertain cost effectiveness irrespective of chosen WTP threshold. The results of this study lend further support to clinical practice guidelines recommending against the use of APM in patients with a degenerative meniscus tear. Given the robustness of existing evidence demonstrating no benefit or cost effectiveness of APM over nonsurgical treatment or placebo surgery, future research is unlikely to alter this conclusion.Level of Evidence Level III, economic analysis.

Effect of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on structural degeneration of the knee – A 5-year MRI-based follow-up of the placebo-surgery controlled FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscus Lesion Study) trial

ObjectiveTo assess the 5-year effects of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) vs. placebo-surgery on the development of the structural changes of the knee by MRI. DesignThis multicentre, randomized, participant- and outcome-assessor-blinded, placebo-surgery-controlled trial was carried out in Finland. We randomized 146 adults, mean age 52 years (range 35 to 65) to undergo either APM or placebo surgery. The subjects had symptoms of degenerative medial meniscus tear, a tear verified in MRI and arthroscopy, and no advanced osteoarthritis at baseline. We compared the baseline and 5-year follow-up MRIs using MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) scoring to derive subregional data on cartilage damage, osteophytes and bone marrow lesions (BMLs). Progression of structural cartilage changes analysed per subregion was the main outcome, that of osteophytes and BMLs secondary outcomes. We analysed the progression with multilevel logistic regression model on subregion level data, adjusted for randomization stratification factors, and using robust standard errors. ResultsSixty-three (90%) subjects in the APM and 73 (96%) in the placebo-surgery group had MRI at both time points. The adjusted odds ratio (APM vs. placebo-surgery) was 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.81, 1.94) for progression of cartilage damage, 2.86 (1.16, 6.21) for osteophytes, and 1.43 (0.84, 2.43) for BMLs. ConclusionsWe found a slightly greater risk for progression of osteophytes in the APM group compared to the placebo-surgery group at 5 years after surgery. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01052233 and NCT00549172).

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for degenerative meniscal tears results in a decreased T2 relaxation time and pain relief: An exploratory randomized clinical trial.

The optimal management of degenerative meniscal tears remains controversial. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been shown to promote tissue repair in both preclinical and clinical studies; however, its effect on degenerative meniscal tears remains unknown. This study aimed to examine whether ESWT improves meniscal degeneration. This randomized trial was conducted between 2020 and 2022 and involved patients with degenerative medial meniscal tears. Patients were allocated to receive either focused ESWT (0.25 mJ/mm2, 2000 impulses, 3 sessions with a 1-week interval) or sham treatment. Patients were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before treatment and at 12 months after treatment. The primary endpoint was improvement in meniscal degeneration, as assessed by the change in T2 relaxation time from baseline on MRI T2 mapping. Knee pain and clinical outcomes were also examined at the same time. Of 29 randomized patients, 27 patients (mean age 63.9 ± 8.7 years; females 37%; ESWT group 14 patients; control group 13 patients) were included in the final analysis. At 12 months postintervention, patients in the ESWT group showed a greater decrease in the T2 relaxation time (ESWT group -2.9 ± 1.7 ms vs. control group 1.0 ± 1.9 ms; p < 0.001) and had less knee pain (p = 0.04). The clinical outcomes at 12 months post-treatment were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. ESWT decreased the T2 relaxation time in the meniscus at 12 months post-treatment. ESWT also provided pain relief, but no differences were observed in clinical outcomes. Level II.

Figure-4 Patient Positioning Increases Medial Meniscus Extrusion on Ultrasound in Patients With Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears of the Knee

To compare the degree of medial meniscal extrusion (MME) between knees with medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) and degenerative tears of the medial meniscus using ultrasonography (US) in different limb positions and to identify the findings characteristic of MMPRT. The study group comprised 25 subjects with MMPRT (group RT), 25 subjects with degenerative medial meniscal tears (group D), and 25 knees with no abnormalities of the medial meniscus (MM) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (group C) whose age was ≥40 years. MME was evaluated using US in the supine, figure-4, feet-dangling, and standing positions. The MME was evaluated by the actual measurement values and the relative values to the MME in the supine position. The differences in the MME among the 3 groups in each limb position were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. P < .05 was considered significant. The actual MME values were largest in group RT in all 4 limb positions. When changing the limb position from the supine to the figure-4, the actual MME increased from 3.8 ± 0.8 mm to 5.5 ± 1.3 mm in group RT, whereas it decreased from 3.4 ± 1.1 mm to 1.8 ± 1.2 mm in group D, showing the most significant difference in MME of the figure-4 position between the 2 groups (P < .001). In group RT, 88% of knees had the maximum MME in the figure-4 position. In group D, 60% of knees had the maximum MME in the standing position and only 2 knees (8%) had the maximum MME in the figure-4 position. The increase in MME from the supine to the figure-4 position was a characteristic finding of MMPRT but not degenerative tears. Level III, case-control study.

Anatomical description and short-term follow up clinical results for ultrasound-guided injection of medial collateral ligament bursa: New conservative treatment option for symptomatic degenerative medial meniscus tear

BackgroundIn this study, we investigated newly developed ultrasound (US)-guided medial collateral ligament (MCL) bursa injection as a conservative therapy for symptomatic degenerative medial meniscal (MM) tears. We aimed to describe the anatomical target and precise technique of this injection, confirm its accuracy using fresh cadaveric knees, and then evaluate preliminary clinical outcomes. MethodsAnatomical studies were performed on three fresh cadavers. For the clinical study, 50 patients with medial knee joint pain without knee osteoarthritis were treated with US-guided MCL bursa injection. Severity of pain was assessed pre-injection, and 1 week and 4 weeks post-injection using a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Clinical success was defined as a full return to daily activities. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 1 week of the first injection. Patients who underwent surgery within 12 months of the first injection were investigated as clinically unsuccessful cases, and MRI and arthroscopic findings were examined. ResultsCompared with pre-injection (6.8 ± 1.2), the average NRS score was significantly lower at 1 week (1.8 ± 2.0) and at 4 weeks (1.5 ± 1.7) post-injection (both P < 0.01). The primary clinical success rate was 76.0%, and injection-related adverse events were not observed. Nine patients underwent surgery (arthroscopic surgery for degenerative flap tear (n = 7) and high tibial osteotomy for medial meniscus posterior root tear and proximal tibial malalignment (n = 2)). ConclusionsUS-guided MCL bursa injection is safe, reproducible, and effective for symptomatic MM degenerative tears. However, US-guided injections of the MCL bursa may be ineffective for flap tears and posterior root tears.

Degenerative Medial Meniscus Tear With a Displaced Flap Into the Meniscotibial Recess and Tibial Peripheral Reactive Bone Edema Presents Good Results With Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment

To report the arthroscopic treatment results of a degenerative medial meniscus tear with a displaced flap into the meniscotibial recess, tibial peripheral reactive bone edema, and focal knee medial pain. As a secondary objective, we propose to identify possible factors associated with a good or poor prognosis of the surgical treatment of this lesion. From 2012 to 2018, patients who had this specific meniscus pathology and underwent arthroscopic surgical treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification greater than 2 were excluded. KL classification, the presence of an Outerbridge grade III/V chondral lesion of the medial compartment, limb alignment, body mass index, and smoking were evaluated. The subjective outcomes included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, improvement in the pain reported by patients, and the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale score. A total of 69 patients were evaluated. The mean age was 58.6 ± 7.1 years. The follow-up time was 48.7 ± 20.8 months. Fifty-five (79.7%) patients reported pain improvement. The postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee was 62.6 ± 15.4, and the mean GPE was 2.3 ± 2.6. Fourteen patients (20.3%) showed no improvement in pain, and 7 patients (10.2%) presented complications. Groups that improved (GPE > 0) and did not improve (GPE < 0) did not present differences regarding age, sex, follow-up time, chondral lesions, or body mass index. Patients without improvement had a greater incidence of smoking (P= .001), varus alignment (P= .008), and more advanced KL classification (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis based on the GPE score, KL classification (P= .038) and smoking (P= .003) were significant. Arthroscopic surgical treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears with a meniscal flap displaced into the meniscotibial recess and adjacent focal bone edema in the tibia shows good results in approximately 80% of cases. Smoking and KL grade 2 were factors associated with poor prognosis of surgical treatment. Level IV (case series).

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 5 year follow-up of the placebo-surgery controlled FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscus Lesion Study) trial

ObjectivesTo assess the long-term effects of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) on the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis, and on knee symptoms and function, at 5 years follow-up.DesignMulticentre, randomised, participant- and...

Progression of radiographic osteoarthritis after partial meniscectomy in degenerative medial meniscal posterior root tears was greater in varus- than in neutral-aligned knees: a minimum 5-year follow-up

To perform a radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis, progression after partial meniscectomy (PM) in degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) in relation to preoperative mechanical axis (MA). The hypothesis is that neutral-aligned knees with degenerative MMPRTs have better radiographic outcomes than those of varus-aligned knees after arthroscopic PM. Records of 114 patients with degenerative MMPRTs and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade ≤ 2 osteoarthritis, who underwent PM, had preoperative weight-bearing hip-to-ankle radiographs from 2004 to 2014, and were followed-up for at least 5 years were reviewed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 2.8years. Preoperative MA values were used to classify the patients into either a Neutral (N valgus 3° to varus 3°; n = 60) or Varus-aligned group (V varus > 3°; n = 54). Joint space width (JSW; mm) and KL grade (0/1/2/3/4) were measured preoperatively and finally on weight-bearing 45° flexion posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. Preoperative JSW and KL grade did not differ significantly between the groups (N vs V; JSW 3.64 ± 0.83 vs 3.44 ± 0.81, P = 0.201; KL grade, 2/31/27/0/0 vs 0/22/32/0/0, P = 0.162); however, the final JSW and KL grade differed significantly between the groups (N vs V; JSW 3.03 ± 0.78 vs 2.07 ± 0.87; KL grade, 0/21/23/13/3 vs 0/10/26/21/6, both P < 0.001). The N group showed significantly less KL progression compared with the V group (N vs V; progression/no progression, 27/33 vs 42/12, P = 0.001). The progression of radiographic osteoarthritis after PM for degenerative MMPRTs was greater in varus-aligned knees than in neutral-aligned knees. PM should be considered cautiously in patients with varus-aligned knees. Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Statistical analysis plan for the 5-year and 10-year follow-up assessments of the FIDELITY trial

BackgroundThe research objectives of the 5-year and 10-year assessments in the Finnish degenerative meniscal lesion study (FIDELITY) are twofold: (1) to assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in adults (age 35 to 65 years) with a degenerative meniscus tear and (2) to determine the respective effects of APM and degenerative meniscus tear on the development of radiographic and clinical knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods and designFIDELITY is an ongoing multi-center, randomized, participant and outcome assessor blinded, placebo-surgery-controlled trial in 146 patients. This statistical analysis plan (SAP) article describes the overall principles for analysis of long-term outcomes (5-year and 10-year follow up), including how participants will be included in each analysis, the primary and secondary outcomes and their respective analyses, adjustments for covariates, and the presentation of the results. In addition, we will present the planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses.DiscussionTo assess the long-term efficacy of APM on knee symptoms and function we are carrying out a long-term (5-year and 10-year) follow up of our placebo-surgery-controlled FIDELITY trial according to statistical principles outlined in detail in this document. As our second primary objective, whether APM (resection of torn meniscus tear) accelerates or delays the development of knee osteoarthritis in patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative tear of the medial meniscus, a pre-registered follow-up is also carried out.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00549172 (Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Degenerative Medial Meniscus Tear). Registered on 25 October 2007 (NCT00549172). ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01052233 (Development of Knee Osteoarthritis After Arthroscopic Partial Resection of Degenerative Meniscus Tear). Registered on 20 January 2010.

Successful treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears in well-aligned knees with fibrin clot implantation.

The purpose of this study was to examine the results of meniscal repair performed for symptomatic degenerative medial meniscal tears. Twenty-four knees in 24 patients with symptomatic degenerative medial meniscal tears (mostly complex horizontal tears) who underwent isolated arthroscopic repair combined with autologous fibrin clot implantation were included in this study. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The overall clinical outcome was evaluated using the Lysholm score, while the activity level was graded on the Tegner Activity Scale. The assessment of healing status at the repair site was based on clinical signs/symptoms and follow-up MRI examination results. In addition, the effects of the patient's clinical and radiological factors on healing of the repaired menisci were analyzed. The mean age of the study subjects was 47.0 ± 8.1 years with a mean follow-up period of 39.3 ± 11.6 months. The Lysholm score significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.01). During the follow-up period, meniscal repairs were deemed to have failed in 6 of the 24 knees (25%). In the analysis of factors influencing meniscal healing, varus deformity (% of mechanical axis < 30%) was identified in all knees in the repair failure group, and the presence of varus deformity was shown to be a significant risk factor correlated with repair failure, while other factors did not significantly influence the healing status. The short-term follow-up results showed that arthroscopic repair of degenerative medial meniscal tears combined with fibrin clot implantation attained clinical healing in 18 of 24 knees (75%) of patients, while 6 of the 24 knees (25%) of patients experienced clinical failure. The presence of varus deformity negatively affects the healing rate. In well-aligned knees, degenerative medial meniscal tears are successfully treated by isolated repair with fibrin clot implantation. IV.

Effect of Lower Limb Alignment in Medial Meniscus-Deficient Knees on Tibiofemoral Contact Pressure.

Background:Degenerative medial meniscal tears and subsequent partial meniscal resection compromise meniscal function and lead to an overload of the medial compartment. In addition, lower limb alignment plays a key role in load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartments, and varus alignment is a potential risk factor for medial osteoarthritis.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate the effect of valgus and varus alignment on peak pressure and contact area in knees with concomitant horizontal medial meniscal tears and subsequent leaflet resection. It was hypothesized that varus alignment in combination with meniscal loss leads to the highest peak pressure within the medial compartment.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were axially loaded using a 1000-N compressive load in full extension with the mechanical axis rotated to intersect the tibial plateau at 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, and 60% of its width (TPW) to simulate varus and valgus alignment. Tibiofemoral peak contact pressure and contact area of the medial and lateral compartments were determined using pressure-sensitive foils in each of 4 different meniscal conditions: intact, 15-mm horizontal tear of the posterior horn, inferior leaflet resection, and resection of both leaflets.Results:The effect of alignment on peak pressure (normalized to the neutral axis) within the medial compartment in cases of an intact meniscus was measured as follows: varus shift resulted in a mean increase in peak pressure of 18.5% at 45% of the TPW and 37.4% at 40% of the TPW, whereas valgus shift led to a mean decrease in peak pressure of 8.7% at 55% of the TPW and 23.1% at 60% of the TPW. Peak pressure changes between the intact meniscus and resection within the medial compartment was less in valgus-aligned knees (0.21 MPa at 60% TPW, 0.59 MPa at 50% TPW, and 0.76 MPa at 40% TPW). Contact area was significantly reduced after partial meniscal resection in the neutral axis (intact, 553.5 ± 87.6 mm2; resection of both leaflets, 323.3 ± 84.2 mm2; P < .001). This finding was consistent in any alignment.Conclusion:Both partial medial meniscal resection and varus alignment led to an increase in medial compartment peak pressure. Valgus alignment prevented medial overloading by decreasing contact pressure even after partial meniscal resection. A horizontal meniscal tear did not influence peak pressure and contact area even in varus alignment.Clinical Relevance:As a clinical consequence, partial meniscal resection should be avoided to maintain the original biomechanical behavior, and the mechanical axis should be taken into account if partial meniscectomy is necessary.

Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Medial Meniscal Root Tears Shows Favorable Outcomes in Well-Aligned, Nonarthritic Knees

Background: Arthroscopic meniscectomy has been commonly performed for persistent pain caused by degenerative medial meniscal posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, risk factors that affect long-term outcomes and joint survivorship after meniscectomy are unclear. Purpose: To identify the risk factors associated with end-stage osteoarthritis after arthroscopic meniscectomy for degenerative MMPRT for middle-aged or elderly patients and to determine the joint survivorship according to the identified risk factors. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data from 288 patients (24 male and 264 female), followed for at least 5 years after arthroscopic meniscectomy for degenerative MMPRTs performed between 1999 and 2010, were examined retrospectively. The modified Lysholm score was used for clinical evaluation. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess factors that affect joint survivorship when conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was taken as the endpoint; these factors were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative tibiofemoral alignment (varus [<2° valgus] vs well-aligned [2°-10° valgus]), preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade (0 or 1 vs 2 or 3), and the modified Outerbridge grade of the medial compartment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survivorship with respect to each significant risk factor. Results: Mean age at the time of surgery was 58.9 years (range, 43-78 years). Sixty (20.8%) patients underwent TKA at 7.0 ± 3.6 years (range, 1.1-14.4 years) postoperatively. The mean follow-up time for those who did not undergo TKA was 8.9 ± 2.9 years (range, 4.5-16.5 years). The overall modified Lysholm score improved from 64.4 to 81.3 (P < .001), but progression of radiographic arthritis was noted in 156 (61.9%) patients (P < .001) at 2 years postoperatively. Age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.049), BMI (HR = 1.092), varus alignment (HR = 2.283), and Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or higher (HR = 2.960) were significant risk factors for end-stage arthritis requiring TKA. Well-aligned nonarthritic knees (n = 131, 45.5%) survived significantly longer before requiring TKA than did knees with varus alignment or radiographic arthritis (P < .05). The 5- and 10-year survival rates in these low-risk groups were 97.7% (95% CI, 95.2%-100.2%) and 89.1% (95% CI, 82.4%-95.8%), respectively. Conclusion: Arthroscopic meniscectomy is an effective treatment for degenerative MMPRTs, with favorable long-term survival in well-aligned nonarthritic knees. However, meniscectomy should be undertaken cautiously in patients with varus alignment and preoperative radiographic osteoarthritis.

In adults with degenerative medial meniscal tear, is physical therapy as effective as surgical treatment of pain relief and improved functional status?

Madigan Army Medical Center, Family Medicine Residency, Seattle, WA The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Army Medical Department, the Army at large or the Department of Defense.

Middle-aged patients with an MRI-verified medial meniscal tear report symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis

Background and purpose — No consensus exists on when to perform arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear. Since MRI and clinical tests are not accurate in detecting a symptomatic meniscal lesion, the patient’s symptoms often play a large role when deciding when to perform surgery. We determined the prevalence and severity of self-reported knee symptoms in patients eligible for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy due to a degenerative meniscal tear. We investigated whether symptoms commonly considered to be related to meniscus injury were associated with early radiographic signs of knee osteoarthritis.Patients and methods — We included individual baseline items from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score collected in 2 randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment for an MRI-verified degenerative medial meniscal tears in 199 patients aged 35–65 years. Each item was scored as no, mild, moderate, severe, extreme, and at least “mild” considering the symptoms present. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis, defined as a Kellgren and Lawrence grade of at least 1, were seen in 70 patients.Results — At least monthly knee pain, pain during stair walking and when twisting on the knee, and lack of confidence in knee was present in at least 80% of the patients. Median severity was at least moderate for knee pain, pain when twisting on the knee, pain walking on stairs, lack of confidence in knee, and clicking. Mechanical symptoms such as catching were rare. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis were associated with an increased risk of self-reported swelling, catching, and stiffness later in the day; the odds ratio was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2–4.9), 2.3 (1.2–4.3), and 2.3 (1.1–5.0), respectively.Interpretation — Middle-aged patients with a degenerative medial meniscus tear reported symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis. Frequent knee pain, presence of lack of confidence in the knee, and clicking did not distinguish those with a meniscal tear alone from those with early radiographic knee OA. Our findings support the notion that symptoms reported by those with a degenerative meniscal tear represent early signs of knee osteoarthritis.

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess if arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is superior to placebo surgery in the treatment of patients with degenerative tear of the medial meniscus.MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, participant-blinded and outcome...

Recovery of lower extremity muscle strength and functional performance in middle-aged patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

To investigate lower extremity muscle strength and functional performance before and after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears. We hypothesized that patients would experience deficiencies in the affected leg at 3months post-surgery, and that this deficiency would be normalized at 12months following surgery. Twenty-three patients (46±6.5years) meniscectomized in 2012 and 2013 were examined for knee extension, knee flexion, and hip abduction maximal isometric muscle strength (iMVC), rate of force development (RFD200), and knee function (single-leg hop for distance and single-leg knee bends in 30s.) before surgery, 3 and 12months after surgery. Functional performance, knee extension iMVC and RFD200 were impaired in the affected leg compared to the contralateral leg (p<0.05) prior to surgery. A significant (Knee extension RFD200, p=0.033) or borderline significant improvement was observed in the affected leg compared to the contralateral leg from before to 12months after surgery in most variables (leg×time interaction, n.s.). Middle-aged patients undergoing surgery for degenerative medial meniscal tears show significant reductions in muscle strength, rapid force production, and functional performance in the leg undergoing surgery compared to the contralateral leg prior to surgery. These deficits in muscle strength and knee function were still present at 3months post-surgery but were no longer observed at 12months following surgery. III.

Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up

Objective To determine if exercise therapy is superior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for knee function in middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears.Design Randomised controlled superiority trial.Setting Orthopaedic departments at...

Mechanical Symptoms and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients With Degenerative Meniscus Tear: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Recent evidence shows that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) offers no benefit over conservative treatment of patients with a degenerative meniscus tear. However, patients who report mechanical symptoms (sensations of knee catching or locking) may benefit from APM. To assess whether APM improves mechanical symptoms better than sham surgery. Randomized, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, sham surgery-controlled, multicenter trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00549172). 5 orthopedic clinics in Finland. Adults (aged 35 to 65 years) with a degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis. APM or sham surgery. Patients' self-report of mechanical symptoms before surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months after surgery. 70 patients were randomly assigned to APM, and 76 were assigned to sham surgery. Thirty-two patients (46%) in the APM group and 37 (49%) in the sham surgery group reported catching or locking before surgery; the corresponding numbers at any follow-up were 34 (49%) and 33 (43%), with a risk difference of 0.03 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.12). In the subgroup of 69 patients with preoperative catching or locking, the risk difference was 0.07 (CI, -0.08 to 0.22). Analyses were post hoc, and the results are only generalizable to knee catching and occasional locking because few patients reported other types of mechanical symptoms. Resection of a torn meniscus has no added benefit over sham surgery to relieve knee catching or occasional locking. These findings question whether mechanical symptoms are caused by a degenerative meniscus tear and prompt caution in using patients' self-report of these symptoms as an indication for APM. Academy of Finland.

Forward lunge knee biomechanics before and after partial meniscectomy

BackgroundPatients following meniscectomy are at increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment and at the patellofemoral joint. As osteoarthritis is widely considered a mechanical disease, it is important to understand the potential effect of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) on knee joint mechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in knee joint biomechanics during a forward lunge in patients with a suspected degenerative meniscal tear from before to three months after APM. MethodsTwenty-two patients (35–55years old) with a suspected degenerative medial meniscal tear participated in this study. Three dimensional knee biomechanics were assessed on the injured and contralateral leg before and three months after APM. The visual analogue scale was used to assess knee pain and the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess sport/recreation function and knee-related confidence before and after APM. ResultsThe external peak knee flexion moment reduced in the APM leg compared to the contralateral leg (mean difference (95% CI)) −1.08 (−1.80 to −0.35) (Nm/(BW×HT)%), p=0.004. Peak knee flexion angle also reduced in the APM leg compared to the contralateral leg −3.94 (−6.27 to −1.60) degrees, p=0.001. There was no change in knee pain between the APM leg and contralateral leg (p=0.118). Self-reported sport/recreation function improved (p=0.004). ConclusionsAlthough patients self-reported less difficulty during strenuous tasks following APM, patients used less knee flexion, a strategy that may limit excessive patellar loads during forward lunge in the recently operated leg.

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy vs Sham Surgery for Degenerative Meniscus Tear

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is the most common orthopedic procedure, yet rigorous evidence of its efficacy is lacking. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham surgery controlled trial involving 146 patients aged 35 to 65 with knee symptoms consistent with degenerative medial meniscus tear and with no radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were randomly assigned to APM or sham surgery. The primary outcomes were change in the Lysholm knee score, the WOMET score and knee pain after exercise (using a numerical rating scale) at 12 months after treatment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean improvement in the Lysholm score was 21.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6 to 25.8) in the APM group and 23.3 (95% CI, 19.5 to 27.2) in the sham surgery group (mean difference -1.6; 95% CI -7.2 to 4.0). The corresponding values were 24.6 (19.7 to 29.4) and 27.1 (22.4 to 31.8) in the WOMET score (-2.5; -9.2 to 4.1), and 3.1 (2.5 to 3.8) and 3.3 (2.8 to 3.8) in knee pain after exercise (-0.1; -0.9 to 0.7) respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of reoperations (2 in APM and 5 in sham surgery) or in the frequency of adverse events (1 in APM and 0 in sham surgery). In this controlled trial involving patients without clinical or radiographic osteoarthritis of knee but with symptoms considered attributable to a degenerative medial meniscus tear, the outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than those after a sham procedure.