Definitive Repair Of Injuries Research Articles

Damage control thoracic surgery: What you need to know.

Damage control surgery in trauma prioritizes patient stabilization through an initial temporizing surgical approach to rapidly control hemorrhage and contamination, minimizing intraoperative time to allow for resuscitation and the correction of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in the intensive care unit. This is followed by definitive repair of injuries once physiological parameters have improved. While damage control techniques for traumatic intra-abdominal and extremity injuries are well established and frequently utilized, the same cannot be said for damage control thoracic surgery. The complexity of thoracic injuries, the intricate decision making process, the level of surgical expertise required, and potential complications make damage control thoracic surgery particularly challenging. However, advances in surgical techniques, improvements in perioperative care, and the emergence of adjuncts such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have significantly enhanced decision making and underscored the importance of timely and decisive intervention in damage control thoracic surgery to optimize patient outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of damage control thoracic surgery, detailing the principles, indications, operative techniques, perioperative management, and the integration of advanced therapies to improve outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries.

“Packing” torácico en urgencias torácicas

Damage control is defined as an approach with 3 stages in patients with life-threatening injuries. Stage I: abbreviated laparotomy for hemorrhage and contamination control. Stage II: intensive care management to correct physiologic abnormalities; and stage III: definitive repair of injuries. Thoracic packing, an adaptation of abdominal packing, was described as a temporary procedure for hemostatic control. The aim of this study is to report our experience with thoracic packing and show its usefulness in thoracic damage control surgery. Traumatic chest injuries vary from minor trauma to life-threatening injuries. The decision to perform thoracic packing is made during the contact with a critically ill patient. In conclusion, packing is effective for bleeding control in critically ill patients who are not suitable for definitive treatment.

Multidetector CT Findings in the Abdomen and Pelvis after Damage Control Surgery for Acute Traumatic Injuries

After experiencing blunt or penetrating trauma, patients in unstable condition who are more likely to die of uncorrected shock than of incomplete injury repairs undergo emergency limited exploratory laparotomy, which is also known as damage control surgery (DCS). This surgery is part of a series of resuscitation steps, with the goal of stabilizing the patient's condition, with rapid surgical control of hemorrhage followed by supportive measures in the intensive care unit before definitive repair of injuries. These patients often are imaged with multidetector CT within 24-48 hours of the initial surgery. Knowledge of this treatment plan is critical to CT interpretation, because there are anatomic derangements and foreign bodies that would not be present in patients undergoing surgery for other reasons. Patients may have injuries beyond the surgical field that are only identified at imaging, which can alter the care plan. Abnormalities related to the resuscitation period such as the CT hypoperfusion complex and ongoing hemorrhage can be recognized at CT. Familiarity with these imaging and clinical findings is important, because they can be seen not only in trauma patients after DCS but also in other patients in the critical care setting. The interpretation of imaging studies can be helped by an understanding of the diagnostic challenges of grading organ injuries with surgical materials in place and the awareness of potential artifacts on images in these patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by LeBedis .

Damage Control Orthopedic Surgery.

The concept of damage control surgery was first described for the purpose of treating medically un-stable patients with abdominal trauma. The purpose of such surgery is rapid control of hemorrhage and contamination, not definitive repair of injuries. The goal is to improve survival of patients with the potentially lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy. Definitive repair of injuries and abdominal closure are not performed at the time of initial laparotomy. Rather, the abdominal wound is left open, a dressing is placed, and the patient is transported to the intensive care unit for continued re-suscitation. This includes optimization of hemodynamic condition, respiratory support, warming, and correction of coagulopathy. Following successful resuscitation, when the patient is medically stable, a return to the operating room is scheduled for repair of injuries and abdominal closure.

Multidisciplinary Management of Blunt Pelvic Trauma

Pelvic fractures account for ∼3% of all fractures and usually occur in patients with polytrauma. Pelvic fractures usually indicate high energy transfer and a significant mechanism of injury, and they can involve massive hemorrhage. For this reason, mortality from pelvic trauma is high, ranging from 40% to 60% among patients in shock, and up to 90% in patients considered to be in extremis. Multidisciplinary approaches in the treatment of patients with pelvic fractures have resulted in improved outcomes for these complex and challenging injuries. In this article, we describe a case of a pediatric patient who suffered severe pelvic fracture with massive hemorrhage, requiring a multidisciplinary approach for control of hemorrhage and definitive repair of injuries.

The Open Abdomen

The use of the "open abdomen" as a technique in the management of the complex surgical patient stems from the concept of damage control. Damage control principles underscore the importance of an abbreviated laparotomy focused on control of hemorrhage and gastrointestinal contamination in patients presenting with significant physiologic compromise. Definitive repair of injuries is postponed and the abdomen is temporarily "closed" using one of a number of different techniques. The ultimate goal is formal abdominal fascial closure within 48-72 hours of the initial laparotomy. Frequently, daily trips to the operating room are required for incremental closure of the abdominal fascia. However, in some cases, fascial closure is not possible secondary to ongoing visceral edema and loss of the peritoneal domain. In these cases, the patient is left with an "open abdomen" until skin grafting over the exposed peritoneal organs can be performed. Patients with an open abdomen have peritoneal contents exposed to the atmosphere and require a complex dressing to maintain fascial domain and provide protection to exposed organs. These patients are typically critically ill and managed in the intensive care unit early in the disease process. The open abdomen has become an important tool for the management of physiologically unstable patients requiring emergent abdominal surgical procedures. These patients present unique challenges to the critical care and nutrition support teams. Careful attention to fluid and electrolyte management, meticulous wound care, prevention of enteroatmospheric fistula, and individualized nutrition support therapy are essential to successful recovery in this patient population.

Closing the Open Abdomen: Improved Success With Wittmann Patch Staged Abdominal Closure

Although the "open abdomen" has likely contributed to improved outcomes in trauma patients, the challenge of subsequent fascial closure has emerged. Since mid 2004, we have incorporated Wittmann Patch staged abdominal closure into our management of the open abdomen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this device on our incidence of fascial closure versus planned ventral hernia. Patients managed by open abdomen from 2001 through 2006 were identified from the trauma registry. Fascial closure immediately after definitive repair of injuries was defined as "early fascial closure." Continuation of the open abdomen beyond the definitive repair of injuries with subsequent fascial closure was defined as "delayed fascial closure." Since April 2004, the Wittmann Patch was uniformly employed in open abdomen management. Patients managed before the use of this device ("pre-Patch") were compared with those managed in the "Patch" era. Fifty-six open abdomens were managed in the pre-Patch era and 103 were managed in the Patch era. In the pre-Patch era, 33 (59%) underwent early fascial closure, compared with 67 (65%) in the Patch era (p NS). For the remaining patients, the incidence of delayed fascial closure was significantly higher in those managed with the Wittmann Patch compared with those managed in the pre-Patch era (78% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Planned ventral hernia was performed in 8 (8%) patients in the Patch era versus 16 (29%) patients in the pre-Patch era (p < 0.001). Abdominal complications were similar between groups (11% vs. 9%, p NS). Incorporating the Wittmann Patch into a clinical pathway for management of the open abdomen has contributed to an increased incidence of delayed fascial closure. Abdominal complications were similar in both groups, suggesting that the device is not only efficacious, but also relatively safe.