Definitive Fixation Research Articles

"Navigating the tides of recovery": early vs. delayed osteosynthesis for closed tibia fractures complicated by acute compartment syndrome - an analysis of one hundred and three cases.

In cases of closed tibia fractures with acute compartment syndrome (ACS), there is no established agreement on whether performing internal fixation at the time of closure or after healing of the fasciotomy wounds would affect the likelihood of non-union or infection risk. The study aims to compare fracture union rates, incidence of infection, and overall outcomes between early and delayed definitive fixation. Retrospective analysis of closed tibia fractures (AO/OTA 41, 42) with ACS between 2010 and 2019 with a minimum two years follow-up. The patients were grouped into group-1 (early-definitive fixation group) and group-2 (delayed-definitive fixation group). The patients were further subdivided into - 1A(early-plate osteosynthesis), 1B(early-intramedullary nail fixation), 2A(delayed-plate osteosynthesis), and 2B(delayed-intramedullary nail fixation). Incidence of ACS in closed tibia fractures was 3.85%. Of the 103 patients included, the patients with plate fixation had a significantly higher union rate in the delayed group (100% vs. 91.66%; P = 0.0001). Similarly, among patients with nail fixation, a significantly higher union rate was seen in the delayed group (96.30% vs. 85.19%; P = 0.0016). The overall incidence of infection was 22.3% (23/103). Moreover, infection was higher in the early definitive fixation group (30.16% vs. 10%; P = 0.016). With a lower incidence of infection and higher union rate among the delayed definitive fixation group, we propose to postpone the definitive fixation of closed tibia fractures complicated by ACS till the complete healing of fasciotomy wounds. This allows for adequate soft tissue healing and improvement in the biological environment of fracture, which boosts the chances of successful union and reduces infection risks.

Temporary osteosynthesis of the tibial bones in repair of multiple and combined injuries

Background The incidence of injury worldwide remains high, with a global estimate of 6763 cases per 00,000 population (95 % confidence interval 6412–7147). Trauma to the limbs is a common injury to an individual anatomical area during multiple or combined trauma that accounts for 40 % to 85.2 % of cases. Assessment of the effectiveness of different fixation options and development of treatment algorithms are essential for patients with tibial fractures and multiple (combined) injuries.The objective was to determine how often temporary tibia fixation is applied for patients with multiple and combined injuries.Material and methods The original literature search was conducted on key resources including Scientific Electronic Library (www.elibrary.ru), the National Library of Medicine (www.pubmed.org), CyberLeninka between 2008 and 2023 using search words and phrases: tibial injuries, osteosynthesis of lower limbs, multiple injuries, combined injuries, temporary osteosynthesis of the tibial bones.Results and discussion A differentiated approach to the repair of bone fractures resulting from multiple and combined injuries is mostly common with the choice of fixation technique depending on the severity of injury and the severity of the patient’s condition. The definitive internal bone fixation is normally used for stable patients, “damage control” strategy is secured for borderline and severe cases using primary temporary external fixation followed by staged surgical intervention. There is no generally accepted strategy for the use of early mobilization of long bone fractures as a component of anti-shock measures in a polytrauma patient.Conclusion Certain issues remain unresolved, including the use of osteosynthesis for tibial fractures in some cohorts of patients, the optimal time of transition to definitive internal fixation, the possibility of using extrafocal osteosynthesis as a definitive treatment, the optimal configuration and assemblies to be employed. The lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials in this field is an important limitation.

No difference in early outcomes comparing intramedullary versus extramedullary fibular fixation in operative ankle fractures

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to compare postoperative complications and outcomes of minimally invasive intramedullary fixation (IMF) versus plate fixation (PF) in the treatment of distal fibular fractures. Materials and methodsA retrospective review was performed from identifying all consecutive ankle fracture patients aged ≥18-years-old surgically managed between August 2017 to September 2022 at a tertiary care center with minimum 6 months clinical follow-up. Patients were grouped into those receiving intramedullary versus extramedullary fibular fixation. The primary outcomes were relevant demographic factors (diabetes, osteoporosis, charlson comorbidity index [CCI]), surgical time, complication rates, reoperation rates. Secondary outcomes included time to definitive fracture fixation, fracture characteristics (AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen classification), syndesmotic instability requiring fixation and discharge disposition. ResultsForty-one IMF patients (average age 55.3 ± 18.1yrs) and 162 PF patients (47.7 ± 17.4yrs) were identified and included in this study. Within the IMF group, 25 patients received IM nailing and 16 patients received percutaneous screw fixation. A greater proportion of IMF patients had diabetes (39 % vs 22 %, p < 0.001), osteoporosis (22 % vs 3 %, p < 0.001), and moderate or severe CCI (41 % vs 23 %, p = 0.017). Surgical time was significantly reduced when using IMF technique (80.4 ± 43.1 min vs 99.1 ± 43.1 min, p = 0.012). Overall complication rates or time to complication did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.578 and p = 0.082, respectively); however, when sub-stratified, IMF patients trended towards experiencing fewer wound related complications versus PF patients (5 % vs 9 %, p = 0.291). No IMF patients experienced deep or superficial infections and only 2 (5 %) patients experienced wound dehiscence. Reoperation rates(15 % vs 10 %, p = 0.267) and time to fracture union (2.7 ± 2.2 mos vs 3.1 ± 2.0 mos, p = 0.301) did not differ significantly. At final follow-up (IMF: 15.0 ± 12.2 mos vs PF: 28.5 ± 19.5 mos), Olerud and Molander ankle score was significantly higher in IMF compared to PF (87.1 ± 14.2 vs 76.2 ± 22.6, p = 0.002). ConclusionPatients in the IMF group at baseline had several comorbid medical conditions that put them at high risk for wound related complications, however, postoperatively they demonstrated higher functional scores and similar complication rates compared to the PF group. It is important to note, however, while we expected a higher rate of wound issues with the PF group, there were no significant differences in infection rates. Either IMF and PF is reliable for fixation and outcomes, and thus with proper soft tissue, biologically friendly technique, either IMF or PF is a reliable choice in the fixation of fibula fractures. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective cohort comparison study.

Do the results of the OXYGEN trial change if analyzed as “as-treated?”: A secondary analysis of the OXYGEN trial

ObjectiveTo determine if the results of the OXYGEN trial changed using an “as-treated” approach instead of the original “intention-to-treat” approach. The multi-center randomized controlled OXYGEN trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of high FiO2 in decreasing infection rates for high-risk tibial plateau, tibial pilon, and calcaneus fractures. MethodsA secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at 29 US trauma centers was performed. A total of 1231 patients aged 18–80 years with tibial plateau, tibial pilon, or calcaneus fractures thought to be at elevated risk of infection were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive inspired oxygen at a concentration of 80 % FiO2 (treatment) or 30 % FiO2 (control). Adherence was defined using two different criteria. Criterion 1 required at least 80 % of the surgery time ≤40 % FiO2 for the control group or ≥70 % FiO2 for the treatment group. Criterion 2 required at least 80 % of surgery time within 20–40 % (control) or 70–90 % FiO2 (treatment). The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) within 182 days of definitive fracture fixation. Secondary outcomes were deep and superficial surgical site infections within 90, 182, and 365 days of definitive fixation. ResultsUnder Criterion 1, the primary outcome occurred in 7 % (38/523) and 10 % (49/471) of patients in the treatment and control groups, respectively (p = 0.10). Deep infection occurred in 30 (6 %) treatment and 30 (6 %) control patients (p = 0.75). Superficial infection occurred in 9 (2 %) treatment and 20 (4 %) control patients (RR, 0.41; p = 0.03). Using Criterion 2, the primary outcome occurred in 7 % (36/498) of treatment and 10 % (48/468) of control patients (p = 0.12). Deep infection occurred in 28 (6 %) treatment and 29 (6 %) control patients (p = 0.81). Superficial infection occurred in 9 (2 %) treatment and 20 (4.3 %) control patients (RR = 0.43; p = 0.03). ConclusionsWhen re-analyzing based on which patients actually received high or control levels of perioperative oxygen fraction, the results are somewhat consistent with the original “intent-to-treat” analysis. Specifically, high perioperative oxygen lowered the risk of superficial SSI but did not affect deep infections.

Orthoplastic Management of Lower Limb Traumas: A Retrospective Study on Polytraumas Versus Isolated Injuries.

Open fractures of the lower limb represent a common challenge for trauma centers. Even where national guidelines are available, these standards are frequently missing. Our study evaluates the influence of polytrauma on the adherence to the timing and management required in an orthoplastic approach. A retrospective review was performed on 36 patients affected by a Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC fracture of the lower limb between 2018 and 2022. Data related to patient management were analyzed: time to the first evaluation by a plastic surgeon, time to soft tissue coverage, time to definitive osteosynthesis, days in intensive care unit (ICU), days of hospitalization, and total cost of hospital stay. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through the administration of 2 questionnaires: the Enneking and the Foot Function Index (FFI). In 23 patients (63.9%), a soft tissue reconstruction was required. Of these, 13 were polytraumas (PT) (56.5%) and 10 were affected by an isolated lower limb fracture (ILLF) (43.5%). The median time to wound excision was 7.0 days (IQR, 0-16.0) in the PT group and 12.5 days (IQR, 1-41.0) in the ILLF group, whereas the mean time to soft tissue coverage was 15.0 days (IQR, 4.0-17.0) in the PT group and 38.0 days (IQR, 25.0-65.0) in the ILLF group. Mean time to definitive fixation was 33.0 days (IQR, 6.5-70.0) in the PT group and 16.5 days (IQR, 3.0-26.0) in the ILLF group. Statistically significant difference was reported on mean time to soft tissue coverage, whereas not relevant differences were reported on mean time to plastic surgeon involvement, first debridement, definitive fixation, days of hospitalization, costs, and Enneking and FFI score. This is the first study comparing the effectiveness of the orthoplastic approach between isolated lower limb fractures and polytraumas. According to our study, open lower limb fracture management is paradoxically more effective in polytraumas rather than in isolated injuries because a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory in severely injured and compromised patients.

The Use of Nitinol Staples as Reduction Aids in Fixation of Forearm Diaphyseal Fractures: Surgical Technique and Case Series.

Forearm diaphyseal fractures are common orthopedic injuries that typically require surgical intervention using various implants and approaches. Maintaining reduction while simultaneously achieving compression in radial and/or ulnar shaft fractures during compression plate application can be challenging, particularly with unstable segmental and/or transverse fracture patterns. Nitinol compression staples have become increasingly used as a reduction aid because of their ability to provide continuous compression between the staple legs at the fracture site, low profile, and ease of application. These staples have the potential to be an effective means of maintaining reduction and applying compression before definitive plate fixation for radial and ulnar shaft fractures. We present our surgical technique and an associated patient series detailing our institution's experience, highlighting favorable outcomes and potential considerations when using nitinol compression staples for forearm fracture management.

Compartment Syndrome in Association with Tibial Plateau Fracture: Standardized Protocols Ensure Optimal Outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to report on the treatment, results, and longer-term outcomes of patients who sustained a tibial plateau fracture with an associated leg compartment syndrome (CS). A total of 766 patients who sustained 766 tibial plateau fractures met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with CS in association with a tibial plateau fracture during their initial hospitalization, 13 at the time of presentation and 1 delayed. The treatment protocol consisted of initial external fixation and fasciotomy, followed by irrigation and debridement, and eventual closure. Fasciotomy cases included 2/14 (14.3%) single incision approaches and 12/14 (85.7%) dual incision approaches. Operative treatment of the tibial plateau fracture was performed at the time of final closure or once soft tissues were permitted. One case of CS that developed following definitive fixation was treated with fasciotomy and delayed primary closure after initial stabilization. Ten (71.4%) were available at 1-year follow-up. We compared these 10 cases to the patients with operative tibial plateau fractures without CS to assess for surgical, radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes. We used a propensity match based on age, body mass index, sex, Charleson comorbidity index, and fracture type to reduce the presence of confounding biases. Standard statistical methods were employed. Those in the CS cohort were younger males (p < 0.05). At latest follow-up, function did not differ between those in the CS group compared with the non-CS cohort (p > 0.05). Clinically, knee flexion (130.7 vs. 126; p = 0.548), residual depression (0.5 vs. 0.2; p = 0.365), knee alignment (87.7 vs. 88.3; p = 0.470), and visual analog scale pain scores (3.0 vs. 2.4; p = 0.763) did not differ between the cohorts. Although infection was higher in the CS cohort, the overall complication rates did not differ between the CS patients and non-CS cohort (p > 0.05). Early identification and standardized treatment protocols for the management of CS that develops in association with a tibial plateau fracture lead to outcome scores that were not significantly different from patients who did not develop CS.

An interplay between orthopaedic trauma and pregnancy—A case series of 42 patients

BackgroundPregnancy and trauma are complex situations with significant implications for maternal and fetal health. Physical and psychological trauma during pregnancy can lead to pre-term labor, abruptio-placenta, and fetal injury or death. Management of trauma is challenging due to physiological and anatomical changes, which can affect fracture management and the risk of radiation exposure. A multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for patient care. This study aimed to determine the impact of orthopaedic trauma on pregnancy and its outcome, and influence of pregnancy on fracture management. Methods and materialA retrospective-study was conducted at a Level-1 trauma-care-center, focusing on 54 pregnant women who sustained trauma between January 2015 and December 2022. The study included patients with closed or open fractures, but excluded those without fractures. Forty-two patients were available with minimum 1 year follow-up. Data was collected from hospital records and PACS, including demographic details, emergency care, and laboratory parameters. Changes made in protocol in fracture management due to pregnancy (primary definitive fixation vs staged management), and impact of trauma on pregnancy outcome; mode-of-delivery, maternal and fetal loss were evaluated. ResultsThe mean age was 30-years (range: 21–43years). Road-traffic-collision was most-common mode-of-injury (66.7 %). 38.1 % were in the first-trimester, 35.7 % in second, and 26.2 % in third-trimester. Eight patients had polytrauma, seven had multiple-injuries, and 27 had isolated-injuries. The maternal-mortality-rate was 0.45 %. Three polytraumatized patients ended up with intrauterine death, two polytrauma patients underwent elective abortion, one patient presented with spontaneous-abortion, and fetal loss was 14.3 % (6-of-42). Out of 42 patients, 10 had open-injuries and 32 had closed-injuries. Nine patients underwent LSCS(lower-segment-caesarean-section), six of them were planned for elective-LSCS due to injury and associated fractures (two patients with pelvic injuries, two neck femur fracture patients, one open distal femur fracture, and one ankle fracture dislocation). ConclusionOrthopaedic trauma during pregnancy can significantly affect pregnancy outcomes and is associated with a notably higher risk of fetal loss. An elective-caesarean-section is recommended for patients with polytrauma, pelvic-injuries, and those who are immobilized for longer-duration. During the third-trimester and in polytraumatized patients, external-fixator-application for lower-limb-injuries is a safe strategy, and definitive fixation could be performed post-delivery.

Staged Management for Distal Femur Fractures: Impacts on Reoperation, Stiffness, and Overall Outcomes.

To evaluate the outcomes of staged management with external fixation (ex-fix) prior to definitive fixation of distal femur fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort. Single Level I Trauma Center. Adults treated operatively between 2004 and 2019 for distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33A/33C) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Excluded cases were those with screw only fixation, acute distal femur replacement, 33B fracture pattern, no radiographs available, or did not have 6-months of follow-up. Postoperative complication rates including surgical site infection [SSI], reoperation to promote bone healing, final knee arc of motion <90 degrees, heterotopic ossification formation, and reoperation for stiffness were compared between patients treated with ex-fix prior to definitive fixation and those not requiring ex-fix. A total of 407 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 27 months (median [IQR] of 12 [7,33] months), (range 6-192 months). Most patients were male (52%) with an average age of 48 [Range: 18-92] years. Ex-fix was utilized in 150 (37%) cases and 257 (63%) cases underwent primary definitive fixation. There was no difference in SSI rates (p=0.12), final knee arc of motion <90 degrees (p=0.51), and reoperation for stiffness (p=0.41) between the ex-fix and no ex-fix groups. The 150 patients requiring ex-fix spent an average of 4.2 days (SD 3.3) in the ex-fix before definitive fixation. These patients were further analyzed by comparing the duration of time spent in ex-fix, <4 days (n=82) and ≥4 days (n=68). Despite longer time spent in ex-fix prior to definitive fixation, there was again no significant difference in any of the complication and reoperation rates when comparing the two groups, including final knee arc of motion <90 degrees (p=0.63), reoperation for stiffness (p=1.00), and SSI (p=0.79). Ex-fix of distal femur fractures as a means of temporary stabilization prior to definitive ORIF does not increase the risk of complications such as SSI, final knee arc of motion <90 degrees, or reoperations for bone healing or stiffness when compared to single stage ORIF of distal femur fractures. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures

ObjectiveTo evaluate risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures. MethodsA secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study investigated internal versus external fixation of severe open tibia fractures at 20 US Level I trauma centers. Adult patients, aged <65 years, with a Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB or severe IIIA metaphyseal or diaphyseal tibia fracture were included. All fractures underwent definitive fixation with either a modern ring external fixator, intramedullary device, and/or plate. Fourteen variables previously identified as risk factors for infection were included in the analysis. Deep surgical site infection was defined as an infection treated with surgical debridement within 1 year of index surgery. ResultsThe study cohort included 430 patients. Deep surgical site infection requiring reoperation occurred in 108 (25 %) patients. The final model identified four risk factors for infection: age >40 years (OR, 2.00; 95 % CI, 1.3–3.1), Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB (OR, 1.80; 95 % CI, 1.1–3.0), embedded wound contamination (OR, 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.1–2.7), and wound length (OR, 1.02/cm; 95 % CI, 1.0–1.05). The model performed poorly at distinguishing infected from uninfected patients (Area Under the Curve=0.57; 95 % CI, 0.51–0.63). ConclusionsSurgeons can now counsel patients with these risk factors that they are at a markedly higher risk of infection. The identification of these risk factors may direct future research aimed at mitigating the risk of deep surgical site infection in this patient population.

Direct anterior bone block grafting for treatment of bone defects and dysplasia of the coronoid process

The aim of the surgery was to treat an elbow instability caused by critical coronoid bone loss (CCBL), lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) insufficiency,and general hyperlaxity by performing adirect anterior coronoid bone graft (CBG) and LUCL reconstruction in the same setting. In cases with CCBL isolated ligament reconstruction harbors ahigh failure rate, necessitating supplementary bony procedures. The diagnosis of CCBL is confirmed through lateral radiographs and further quantified through computed tomography (CT) imaging. Objective assessment of instability is conducted with standardized arthroscopic tests. Performing an anterior approach for CBG offers distinct advantages, notably in terms of achieving precise positioning of plates and screws and providing access to the proximal radioulnar joint. Usual contraindications to surgery, coronoid bone loss less than 40%. The surgical procedure is thoroughly illustrated with avideo of the operation that can be accessed online: reconstruction of the LUCL with asemitendinosus allograft, harvesting of the graft from the iliac crest, exposure of the coronoid process with adirect anterior approach, freshening up of the graft bed. Temporary fixation of the graft with aKirschner wire. Assessment of joint congruency, stability and range of motion (ROM) prior to definitive fixation with a2.4 mm buttress plate and screws. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to prevent heterotopic ossification. Elbow mobilization in pronation from day1 with an overhead motion protocol. Removable splint for 4weeks, free mobilization at 6weeks, return to sport at 3months. Durable elbow stability was achieved along with free ROM and high patient satisfaction.

Effect of Mechanical Stability of Osteosynthesis on infection rates: Timing of temporary and definitive fixation

Fracture related infection (FRI) remains one of the most challenging complications of orthopaedic trauma surgery. Several factors contribute to FRI development but, among those, particularly interesting from the orthopaedic surgeon's perspective is the contribution of mechanical stability and timing of fracture fixation. These are indeed crucial factors both in prevention and treatment of FRI and are directly influenced by the surgeon's work. While the role of stability has been studied and discussed, the pathophysiological process regulating such role and how this influences surgeon's treatment decision making is still debated. The same applies to the ideal timing of temporary or definitive fixation which varies according to the clinical scenario considered.In the present narrative review, we described the influence of mechanical stability on both FRI pathophysiology and on the decision making of FRI treatment. In addition, we analysed the impact of the timing of fracture fixation on the risk of FRI development particularly in those clinical scenarios where it has been shown to be specifically relevant, such as fractures affecting segments with poor soft tissue envelope, open fractures, damage control orthopaedics, and the need for soft tissue coverage.

Mid to Long-Term Outcomes of Grade III-B Open Tibial Fractures Definitively Managed With a Circular Frame: A 13-Year Prospective Database Study at a Major Trauma Center.

The aim of this study was to report experience of a major trauma center utilizing circular frames as definitive fixation in patients sustaining Gustilo-Anderson 3B open tibial fractures. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively interrogated. Single major trauma center in the United Kingdom. All patients over the age of 16 sustaining an open tibial fracture with initial debridement performed at the study center. All patients also received orthoplastic care for a soft tissue defect (via skeletal deformation or a soft tissue cover procedure) and subsequent definitive management using an Ilizarov ring fixator. Patients who received primary debridement at another center, had preexisting infection, sustained a periarticular fracture, or those who did not afford a minimum of 12-month follow-up were excluded. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to collate patient demographics and injury factors. The primary outcome of interest was deep infection rate with secondary outcomes including time to union and secondary interventions. Two hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 43.2 year old, with 72% males, 34% smokers, and 3% diabetics. Total duration of frame management averaged 6.4 months (SD 7.7). Eight (3.5%) patients developed a deep infection and 41 (20%) exhibited signs of a pin site infection. Seventy-nine (35.1%) patients had a secondary intervention, of which 8 comprised debridement of deep infection, 29 bony procedures, 8 soft tissue operations, 30 frame adjustments, and 4 patients requiring a combination of soft tissue and bony procedures. Bony union was achieved in 221 cases (98.2%), 195 (86.7%) achieved union in a single frame without the need for secondary intervention, 26 required frame adjustments to achieve union. Autologous bone grafts were used in 10 cases. Orthoplastic care including circular frame fixation for Gustilo-Anderson-3B fractures of the tibia resulted in a low rate of deep infection (3.5%) and achieved excellent union rates (98.2%). Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Primary Closure of External Fixator Pin Sites Is Safe After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

To determine if rates of pin site infection and surgical site infection among patients managed with primary closure after external fixator removal were similar to those allowed to heal secondarily. Retrospective cohort. Urban/Suburban Academic Level I Trauma Center. Patients who had received a lower extremity external fixator for provisional management before definitive fixation of lower extremity fractures were included with pin site wounds closed primarily or allowed to heal by secondary intention. The rate of pin tract infection and surgical site infection following primary closure of external fixator pin sites relative to patients whose pin sites were allowed to heal through secondary intention. In total, 256 patients were evaluated: 143 patients (406 pin sites) in the primary closure group and 113 patients (340 in sites) in the secondary closure group. The average age was 49 ± 16 years. Sixty-five percent of included patients were male. There was no difference in pin tract infections between cohorts (primary = 0.5%, secondary = 1.5%, P = 0.26). External fixator duration in the primary closure group was 11.5 ± 8.4 days and 13.0 ± 8.1 days in the secondary closure group (P = 0.15). There was a greater rate of surgical site infections in the secondary intention cohort (15.9% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.047). There was no difference in pin site infection rate after primary pin site closure relative to patients who were allowed to heal through secondary intention. Furthermore, there was a lower rate of surgical site infection after primary closure. These results challenge the dogma of secondary closure for ex fix pin sites, suggesting that debridement and primary closure is a safe option for management of external fixator pin sites and may impart benefit in decreasing infection risk. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

External fixation as definitive treatment or external fixation followed by early fixation in open fractures of the tibial shaft: A descriptive study

IntroductionTreatment options for open tibial shaft fractures include external fixation with or without early conversion to internal fixation. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to describe 1) early conversion to internal fixation and definitive external fixation and 2) in case of conversion, to identify risk factors for complications. MethodsSeventy-two external fixations of open fractures of the tibial shaft (Gustilo classification, 7 fractures (9.7 %) grade I, 25 fractures (34.7 %) grade II, 40 fractures (55.6 %) grade III (31 grade IIIA and 9 grade IIIB)) were included in a continuous non-randomised study. Thirty-three fractures without infection signs were converted to internal fixation at a mean time of 40.5 +/-15 days (IF group). External fixation was maintened in the remaining 39 fractures (EF group). ResultsIn the “IF” group, the union rate was 69.7 % at 6.3 +/-3.6 months (3–16). All patients had complete union at 16 months, requiring 2.8 +/-0.8 reoperations. Fixation with external fixation only (“EF” group) showed a union rate of 51.3 % at 8.9 +/-4 (5–22) months and 96 % at 16 months after 3.7 +/-0.9 reoperations. Superficial infection (12.1 %; p = 0.011) and numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) were found to be risk factors for deep infection. Time to wound closure >7 days (p = 0.049), time to reoperation >28 days (p = 0.00), numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) and deep infection (6.1 %; p = 0.027) were found to be union failure factors. ConclusionEarly conversion of external fixation to internal fixation is an effective option to achieve bone union of open tibial fractures in selected patients.

Management of infected bone defects of the femoral shaft by Masquelet technique: sequential internal fixation and nail with plate augmentation

BackgroundTo evaluate the effectiveness of a sequential internal fixation strategy and intramedullary nailing with plate augmentation (IMN/PA) for bone reconstruction in the management of infected femoral shaft defects using the Masquelet technique.MethodsWe performed a retrospective descriptive cohort study of 21 patients (mean age, 36.4 years) with infected bone defects of the femoral shaft treated by the Masquelet technique with a minimum follow-up of 18 months after second stage. After aggressive debridement, temporary stabilisation (T1) was achieved by an antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer and internal fixation with a bone cement–coated locking plate. At second stage (T2), the spacer and the locking plate were removed following re-debridement, and IMN/PA was used as definitive fixation together with bone grafting. We evaluated the following clinical outcomes: infection recurrence, bone union time, complications, and the affected limb’s knee joint function.ResultsThe median and quartiles of bone defect length was 7 (4.75–9.5) cm. Four patients required iterative debridement for infection recurrence after T1. The median of interval between T1 and T2 was 10 (9–19) weeks. At a median follow-up of 22 (20–27.5) months, none of the patients experienced recurrence of infection. Bone union was achieved at 7 (6–8.5) months in all patients, with one patient experiencing delayed union at the distal end of bone defect due to screws loosening. At the last follow-up, the median of flexion ROM of the knee joint was 120 (105–120.0)°.ConclusionsFor infected femoral shaft bone defects treated by the Masquelet technique, sequential internal fixation and IMN/PA for the reconstruction can provide excellent mechanical stability, which is beneficial for early functional exercise and bone union, and does not increase the rate of infection recurrence.

Biomechanical evaluation of different medial column fixation patterns for valgus pilon fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to perform a biomechanical analysis to compare different medial column fixation patterns for valgus pilon fractures in a case-based model.MethodsBased on the fracture mapping, 48 valgus pilon fracture models were produced and assigned into four groups with different medial column fixation patterns: no fixation (NF), K-wires (KW), intramedullary screws (IS), and locking compression plate (LCP). Each group contained wedge-in and wedge-out subgroups. After fixing each specimen on the machine, gradually increased axial compressive loads were applied with a load speed of one millimeter per minute. The maximum peak force was set at 1500 N. Load-displacement curves were generated and the axial stiffness was calculated. Five different loads of 200 N, 400 N, 600 N, 800 N, 1000 N were selected for analysis. The specimen failure was defined as resultant loading displacement over 3 mm.ResultsFor the wedge-out models, Group-IS showed less displacement (p < 0.001), higher axial stiffness (p < 0.01), and higher load to failure (p < 0.001) than Group-NF. Group-KW showed comparable displacement under loads of 200 N, 400 N and 600 N with both Group-IS and Group-LCP. For the wedge-in models, no statistical differences in displacement, axial stiffness, or load to failure were observed among the four groups. Overall, wedge-out models exhibited less axial stiffness than wedge-in models (all p < 0.01).ConclusionsFunctional reduction with stable fixation of the medial column is essential for the biomechanical stability of valgus pilon fractures and medial column fixation provides the enough biomechanical stability for this kind of fracture in the combination of anterolateral fixation. In detail, the K-wires can provide a provisional stability at an early stage. Intramedullary screws are strong enough to provide the medial column stability as a definitive fixation. In future, this technique can be recommended for medial column fixation as a complement for holistic stability in high-energy valgus pilon fractures.

9 Early vs Late Definitive Fixation of Pelvic Ring Fractures in Polytraumatized Patients. a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Aim The aim of this systematic review is to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between early (EDF) and late definitive fixation (LDF) in polytraumatized patients with pelvic ring fractures (PRF). Method The following databases: Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2022. Studies comparing EDF and LDF for PRF in polytrauma patients defined as ISS &amp;gt;15 were included. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results Out of 869 studies screened, 10 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 2918 patients. The most common time point used to define EDF was within 24 hours of hospital admission and LDF (&amp;gt;24hr). The most common reasons for LDF were surgeon’s choice, availability of pelvic surgeon and transfer from other hospitals. Our meta-analysis revealed that EDF was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.52 days; 95% CI: [-5.43 to -1.62], p&amp;lt;0.0003) and lower incidence of ARDS (RR=0.48; 95% CI: [0.20 to 1.18], p=0.04). No significant association was found in mortality, length of ICU stays, multi-organ failure, sepsis and surgical site infection between EDF and LDF. Conclusions These findings suggest that early definitive fixation may be a safe and viable option with no increased risk of complications and mortality. However, the adequacy of resuscitation and the estimate of physiologic reserve should be balanced with the risks of operative fixation in all patients. Further prospective validation studies are warranted to test the predictive ability of the various proposed trauma care models and stratify patients for EDF.

The validity and reliability of CT scan based tibial plateau mapping for tibial plateau fractures

Introduction The Schatzker and computed tomography (CT)-based three-column classifications are the most used for tibial plateau fractures. The newer “10-segment classification” suggested to have better fracture identification and more accurate planning. This study aimed to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification and to clarify its validity in clinical practice. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with tibial plateau fractures who were admitted to a university hospital through the period between January 2020 and December 2022 was done. Patients with complete preoperative imaging, including radiographs, CT scans with three-dimensional reconstruction, and postoperative radiographs were included. Missing imaging, open fractures, pathological fractures, conservative management, or definitive fixation by circular external fixator were excluded. Data were reviewed independently by three expert trauma surgeons twice with 2-week intervals with randomization of case sequencing to evaluate their interobserver and intraobserver reliability for the Schatzker, CT-based three-column, and the new 10-segment classifications. The validity of the 10-segment classification was assessed by the agreement on the approach and implant position suggested by the observers. Results Good interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found as regards the Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications on both intervals. Moderate and poor interobserver reliability “on both intervals respectively” and poor intraobserver reliability was found for the 10-segment classification. As regards the agreement on surgical approach on both time intervals, moderate and good interobserver agreements were found. For the implant position, poor interobserver agreement on both intervals was found. Intraobserver agreement for the surgical approach was good, while the intraobserver agreement for the implant position was moderate. Conclusion The Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications are still more reliable than the newer 10-segment classification. This may be explained as it is still not familiar to surgeons and needs more training to be applied in clinical practice.

Three predictive scores compared in a retrospective multicenter study of nonunion tibial shaft fracture.

Delayed union, malunion, and nonunion are serious complications in the healing of fractures. Predicting the risk of nonunion before or after surgery is challenging. To compare the most prevalent predictive scores of nonunion used in clinical practice to determine the most accurate score for predicting nonunion. We collected data from patients with tibial shaft fractures undergoing surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 in three different trauma hospitals. In this retrospective multicenter study, we considered only fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. We calculated the tibia FRACTure prediction healING days (FRACTING) score, Nonunion Risk Determination score, and Leeds-Genoa Nonunion Index (LEG-NUI) score at the time of definitive fixation. Of the 130 patients enrolled, 89 (68.4%) healed within 9 months and were classified as union. The remaining patients (n = 41, 31.5%) healed after more than 9 months or underwent other surgical procedures and were classified as nonunion. After calculation of the three scores, LEG-NUI and FRACTING were the most accurate at predicting healing. LEG-NUI and FRACTING showed the best performances by accurately predicting union and nonunion.