Definition Of Lupus Low Disease Activity State Research Articles

POS0759 DOES LLDAS DEFINITION MATCH THE RHEUMATOLOGIST OPINION? THE FIRST VISIT EVALUATION OF A LONGITUDINAL SPANISH MULTICENTER STUDY TO ASSESS REASONS OF DISAGREEMENT.

BackgroundTreat to Target strategies are necessary in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). They are difficult to establish due to the heterogeneity of the disease. The current definitions of Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) according to the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) and remission according to Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) 2021 are difficult to achieve and maintain over time.ObjectivesTo evaluate the concordance between the LLDAS and the clinical status according to the rheumatologist opinion and reasons of disagreement. To explore modifications in LLDAS definition that best fit with the expert´s opinion.MethodsProspective multicenter study of SLE patients (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria or clinical diagnosis by the physician) from seven Spanish Rheumatology Departments. Statistical analysis: descriptive cross-sectional (at the time of recruitment) analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics, treatments; remission and LLDAS and the subjective evaluations of SLE activity by the rheumatologist. Analysis of the level of agreement between expert opinion and the definition of LLDAS and its modification were evaluated using Cohen’s kappa.ResultsDEMOGRAPHIC, DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENTS. Five hundred and eight were included (92% women; mean age (±SD): 50.4 years (±13.7)). Mean SLEDAI-2K (±SD) was 2.84 (±3.31). A total of 406 (79.9%) patients presented SLEDAI-2K≤4. A total of 317 (74.1%) patients were on antimalarial treatment. Two hundred and twenty-two (43.7%) patients were on some type of immunosuppressive or biological therapy. More than half of patients were not taking glucocorticoids (n=310, 61%). A total of 38 patients (7.5%) were taking doses of prednisone higher than 7.5mg/day.REMISSION/LLDAS 267 (54.4%) patients were in remission and 304 (62.7%) patients were in LLDAS. According to the expert opinion of the rheumatologist, remission was the most frequent state considered (n=206, 41.6%); followed by low activity (n=153, 30.9%); serologically active (n=71, 14.3%); moderate activity (n=55, 11.1%) and high activity (n=10, 2%).AGREEMENT Overall agreement between expert opinion and the definition of LLDAS was 71.4 % with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.3. The majority of the cases (96.1%) that fulfilled the definition of LLDAS, were classified by the expert as remission, serologically active or low activity. Only 12 (3,9%) patients were classified by the expert as moderate or high activity. Of the patients that did not fulfill the definition of LLDAS, 126 out of 179 (70.4%) patients were classified by the expert as remission/low disease activity (Figure 1). The main reasons for discordance in the group that did not fulfill the definition of LLDAS were the presence of new clinical features compared to previous visit and a SLEDAI 2-K >4, in 74 (58.7%) and 59 (46.8%) patients, respectively. The LLDAS adjustment that meant a significant increase in the agreement was the exclusion of the comparative features with the previous visit, with an increase in the agreement to 82.6% (95% CI: 81.61-83.96%). The modification of prednisone to 5mg/daily dose, did not represent a significant change in agreement from the original definition.Figure 1.Comparison of LLDAS and expert opinionConclusionAt a given point in time, almost two thirds of SLE patients were in remission or in LLDAS. There is a good correlation between LLDAS and the physician’s opinion, particularly for those patients who fulfill LLDAS definition. However, the agreement is not so good for patients who don’t, these being excessively classified by the physician as remission or low activity. The main LLDAS items causing this disagreement were a SLEDAI-2K >4 and the appearance of different clinical manifestations from the previous evaluation. On the contrary, physician assessment by the PGA adequately fits the LLDAS definition. The modification of the LLDAS definition excluding the comparison with previous assessment increases the agreement with the expert opinion to 82.6%.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared

Validity of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity score (SLE-DAS) for definition of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS).

SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) is a novel, rapid, continuous and comprehensive score that overcomes the drawbacks of SLEDAI-2K. Low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) has been targeted as an endpoint in many clinical trials and as a favourable outcome in clinical practice. Therefore, our objective in the current study is to evaluate the validity of SLE-DAS for defining LLDAS as an objective in the treat-to-target strategy. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 117 SLE patients who were diagnosed according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE. Patients were evaluated for disease activity by both SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS. Additionally, patients were divided according to the SLEDAI-2K-derived LLDAS definition into two groups: low disease activity (LDA) group and high disease activity (HDA) group. The validity of SLE-DAS for the definition of LLDAS was evaluated in comparison to SLEDAI-2K. SLE-DAS shows highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.743, p < 0.001) with SLEDAI-2K. The ROC curve revealed that SLE-DAS is valid for the assessment of activity with the best detection of LLDAS was at 6.62 with 95.5% sensitivity, 79.3% specificity and 89.6% accuracy. Moreover, it had a good agreement with the SLEDAI-2K-derived definition of LLDAS (k = 0.765, p < 0.001). SLE-DAS is a valid score for the definition of LLDAS which can be used in the clinical practice as a simple and precise standalone criterion. Key Points • Correlation between SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS revealed a high significance. • Identify SLE-DAS cut-off 6.62 for the definition of LLDAS. • There is a good agreement between SLEDAI-2K-derived definition of LLDAS and SLE-DAS definition.

How can we define low disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus?

Background: In recent years, low disease activity emerged as a state that is associated with improved long-term outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our aim was to review the current concepts for low disease activity in SLE in order to serve as the basis of a future consensus for standardization.Methods: The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles from inception up to July 2018. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH terms) included “lupus” AND “low disease activity” OR “minimal disease activity”.Results: Three different definitions of low disease activity in lupus have been proposed. Minimal disease activity (MDA) is defined as a clinical SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K)≤1 on antimalarials, immunosuppressives in standard doses and prednisone ≤5 mg/day. Low disease activity (LDA) allows for a clinical SLEDAI-2K≤2 maintained on antimalarials only. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) accepts a SLEDAI-2K≤4 with no activity from major organ systems, a Physician's Global Assessment of ≤1 with no new activity, prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day and standard doses of antimalarials, immunosuppressives and biologics. Active serology (anti-dsDNA and complement C3/C4) is not included in the MDA and LDA but counts towards disease activity in the LLDAS definition. All definitions were associated with less damage-accrual and mortality in the long-term that were comparable to those of clinical remission.Conclusions: There is solid evidence that low disease activity is associated with improved outcomes in SLE and could serve as a therapeutic target in daily practice and clinical trials. Future research should focus on advancing a consensus for the best possible definition.

Association of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) with health-related quality of life in a multinational prospective study

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Recently, meeting a definition of a lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), analogous to low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis, was preliminarily validated as associated with protection from damage accrual. The LLDAS definition has not been previously evaluated for association with patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether LLDAS is associated with better HR-QoL, and examine predictors of HR-QoL, in a large multiethnic, multinational cohort of patients with SLE.MethodsHR-QoL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form health survey (SF-36v2) in a prospective study of 1422 patients. Disease status was measured using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI-2 K), physician global assessment (PGA) and LLDAS.ResultsSignificant differences in SF-36 domain scores were found between patients stratified by ethnic group, education level and damage score, and with the presence of active musculoskeletal or cutaneous manifestations. In multiple linear regression analysis, Asian ethnicity (p < 0.001), a higher level of education (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001) and shorter disease duration (p < 0.01) remained significantly associated with better physical component scores (PCS). Musculoskeletal disease activity (p < 0.001) was negatively associated with PCS, and cutaneous activity (p = 0.04) was negatively associated with mental component scores (MCS). Patients in LLDAS had better PCS (p < 0.001) and MCS (p < 0.001) scores and significantly better scores in multiple individual SF-36 domain scores. Disease damage was associated with worse PCS (p < 0.001), but not MCS scores.ConclusionsEthnicity, education, disease damage and specific organ involvement impacts HR-QoL in SLE. Attainment of LLDAS is associated with better HR-QoL.

Does expert opinion match the operational definition of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)? A case-based construct validity study.

To evaluate the construct validity of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), a treatment target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Fifty SLE case summaries based on real patients were prepared and assessed independently for meeting the operational definition of LLDAS. Fifty international rheumatologists with expertise in SLE, but with no prior involvement in the LLDAS project, responded to a survey in which they were asked to categorize the disease activity state of each case as remission, low, moderate, or high. Agreement between expert opinion and LLDAS was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Overall agreement between expert opinion and the operational definition of LLDAS was 77.96% (95% CI: 76.34-79.58%), with a Cohen's kappa of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.55-0.61). Of the cases (22 of 50) that fulfilled the operational definition of LLDAS, only 5.34% (59 of 22 × 50) of responses classified the cases as moderate/high activity. Of the cases that did not fulfill the operational definition of LLDAS (28 of 50), 35.14% (492 of 28 × 50) of responses classified the cases as remission/low activity. Common reasons for discordance were assignment to remission/low activity of cases with higher corticosteroid doses than defined in LLDAS (prednisolone ≤ 7.5mg) or with SLEDAI-2K >4 due to serological activity (high anti-dsDNA antibody and/or low complement). LLDAS has good construct validity with high overall agreement between the operational definition of LLDAS and expert opinion. Discordance of results suggests that the operational definition of LLDAS is more stringent than expert opinion at defining a low disease activity state.

Frequency and predictors of the lupus low disease activity state in a multi-national and multi-ethnic cohort.

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic heterogeneous disease with considerable burden from disease activity and damage. A novel clinical treatment target in the form of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) has been recently reported, with retrospective validation showing that time spent in LLDAS translates to reduced damage accrual. The objectives of this study were to describe the frequency and identify the predictors of attaining LLDAS in a large multinational cohort of patients with SLE.MethodsData were collected at the recruitment visit in patients with SLE enrolled in a longitudinal study in nine countries. Data were analysed cross-sectionally against the recently published definition of LLDAS, and the frequency and characteristics associated with presence of LLDAS were determined. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of LLDAS.ResultsOf the 1846 patients assessed, criteria for LLDAS were met by 44 %. Patients with shorter disease duration were less likely to be in LLDAS (OR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.19–0.49, p < 0.001). Likewise, patients with a history of discoid rash (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.49–0.89, p = 0.006), renal disease (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.48–0.75, p < 0.001), elevated double stranded DNA (OR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.53–0.81, p < 0.001) or hypocomplementaemia (OR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.40–0.67, p < 0.001) were less likely to be in LLDAS. When countries were compared, higher national social wealth (OR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.25–1.98, p < 0.001) as measured by the gross domestic product per capita was positively associated with LLDAS, but ethnicity was not.ConclusionThe lupus low disease activity state is observed in less than half of patients with SLE at a single point in time. Disease duration and phenotype, and national social wealth, are predictive of LLDAS.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1163-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Definition and initial validation of a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)

AimsTreating to low disease activity is routine in rheumatoid arthritis, but no comparable goal has been defined for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We sought to define and validate a Lupus...

437. Association of Neostigmine, Clonidine and Ropivacaine 0,75% I.T for Orthopaedic Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fracture in Elderly

Aims Treating to low disease activity is routine in rheumatoid arthritis, but no comparable goal has been defined for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We sought to define and validate a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Methods A consensus definition of LLDAS was generated using Delphi and nominal group techniques. Criterion validity was determined by measuring the ability of LLDAS attainment, in a single-centre SLE cohort, to predict non-accrual of irreversible organ damage, measured using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI). Results Consensus methodology led to the following definition of LLDAS: (1) SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no haemolytic anaemia or gastrointestinal activity; (2) no new lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; (3) a Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI physician global assessment (scale 0–3) ≤1; (4) a current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose ≤7.5 mg daily; and (5) well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents. Achievement of LLDAS was determined in 191 patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. Patients who spent greater than 50% of their observed time in LLDAS had significantly reduced organ damage accrual compared with patients who spent less than 50% of their time in LLDAS (p=0.0007) and were significantly less likely to have an increase in SDI of ≥1 (relative risk 0.47, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.79, p=0.005). Conclusions A definition of LLDAS has been generated, and preliminary validation demonstrates its attainment to be associated with improved outcomes in SLE.

Color atlas

Background: In recent years, low disease activity emerged as a state that is associated with improved long-term outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our aim was to review the current concepts for low disease activity in SLE in order to serve as the basis of a future consensus for standardization.Methods: The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles from inception up to July 2018. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH terms) included “lupus” AND “low disease activity” OR “minimal disease activity”.Results: Three different definitions of low disease activity in lupus have been proposed. Minimal disease activity (MDA) is defined as a clinical SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K)≤1 on antimalarials, immunosuppressives in standard doses and prednisone ≤5 mg/day. Low disease activity (LDA) allows for a clinical SLEDAI-2K≤2 maintained on antimalarials only. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) accepts a SLEDAI-2K≤4 with no activity from major organ systems, a Physician's Global Assessment of ≤1 with no new activity, prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day and standard doses of antimalarials, immunosuppressives and biologics. Active serology (anti-dsDNA and complement C3/C4) is not included in the MDA and LDA but counts towards disease activity in the LLDAS definition. All definitions were associated with less damage-accrual and mortality in the long-term that were comparable to those of clinical remission.Conclusions: There is solid evidence that low disease activity is associated with improved outcomes in SLE and could serve as a therapeutic target in daily practice and clinical trials. Future research should focus on advancing a consensus for the best possible definition.