Definition Of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Research Articles

Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS: A Retrospective Cohort Study From South Africa

BackgroundA proposed New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) seeks to update the Berlin Definition and account for non-intubated ARDS and ARDS diagnoses in resource-variable settings. Research QuestionHow does ARDS epidemiology change with operationalizing the new Global Definition of ARDS in a resource-limited setting? Study Design and MethodsWe performed a real-use retrospective cohort study among adult patients meeting criteria for Berlin Definition ARDS or Global Definition ARDS at ICU admission, in two public hospitals in the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, South Africa, January 2017 – June 2022. ResultsAmong 5,760 adult (age ≥ 18 years) ICU admissions, 2,027 (35.2%) patients met at least one ARDS definition including 1,218 patients meeting Berlin Definition ARDS (60.1% of all ARDS diagnoses) and 809 new diagnoses of Global Definition ARDS that were not captured by the Berlin Definition alone (39.9% of all ARDS diagnoses and 14.0% of all ICU admissions). After adjustment for hospital-level factors, patients who met Global Definition–only ARDS criteria (i.e., who would not have been captured by the Berlin Definition) had no statistically significant ICU mortality difference versus patients with Berlin Definition ARDS (21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.9-24.4%] vs 23.8% [95% CI 21.5-26.2%], odds ratio [OR] 0.88 [95% CI 0.70-1.10, p = 0.25]). In pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses, non–COVID-19 patients meeting Global Definition–only ARDS criteria had reduced ICU mortality (14.2% [95% CI 11.6-16.9%] vs 22.2% [95% CI 19.8-24.6%], OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.45-0.75, p < 0.0005) compared to non–COVID-19 Berlin Definition ARDS. InterpretationThe New Global Definition of ARDS captures a significant proportion of patients who would not have been included by the Berlin Definition alone. These additional ARDS patients may have heterogenous patterns of outcomes between diagnostic subgroups, including by COVID-19 status, compared to Berlin Definition ARDS patients.

The influence of sex, age, and body height on the pulmonary vascular permeability index – a prospective observational study

The pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) is a quotient of the extravascular lung water (EVLW) and the pulmonary blood volume (PBV). In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the alveolar-capillary membrane integrity is disrupted. The result is a disproportionate increase of EVLW compared to the PBV and, hence, an increase in PVPI. Thus, PVPI has repetitively been discussed to extend the definition of ARDS. Besides sex, the influence of other anthropometric variables on PVPI has not been studied so far. However, since it is known that EVLW depends on body height and sex, we hypothesize that PVPI depends on anthropometric variables as well. This prospective single-center observational study included 1533 TPTD measurements of 251 non-critically ill patients (50.6% men) undergoing elective neuro-, thoracic, or abdominal surgery at the Munich Clinic Bogenhausen of the Technical University of Munich. Multivariate regressions were used to measure the influence of sex, age, and body height on PVPI. In all patients, PVPI was significantly higher in women (P < 0.001), with 34.4% having a PVPI > 2 compared to 15.9% of men. Mean PVPI significantly decreased with height (P < 0.001) and age (P < 0.001). Multivariate regressions allowed the calculation of mean reference surfaces. The 95th percentile surface for PVPI was > 3 for small and young women and well above 2 for all but tall and elderly men. In patients who underwent (lung reduction) thoracic surgery, the PVPI before and after surgery did not differ significantly (P = 0.531), and post-surgical PVPI did not correlate with the amount of lung resected (P = 0.536). Hence, we conclude that PVPI may be independent of the extent of lung volume reduction. However, PVPI is heavily dependent on sex, age, and body height. Anthropometric variables thus have a significant impact on the likelihood of misclassified abnormal PVPI. This warrants further studies since an increased PVPI, e.g. in the context of an ARDS, may be overlooked if anthropometric variables are not considered. We suggest reference surfaces based on the 95th-percentile corrected for sex, age, and height as a novel approach to normalize PVPI.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: A review of ARDS across the life course.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a multifactorial, inflammatory lung disease with significant morbidity and mortality that predominantly requires supportive care in its management. Although initially described in adult patients, the diagnostic definitions for ARDS have evolved over time to accurately describe this disease process in pediatric and, more recently, neonatal patients. The management of ARDS in each age demographic has converged in the application of lung-protective ventilatory strategies to mitigate the primary disease process and prevent its exacerbation by limiting ventilator-induced lung injury. However, differences arise in the preferred ventilatory strategies or adjunctive pulmonary therapies used to mitigate each type of ARDS. In this review, we compare and contrast the epidemiology, common etiologies, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and outcomes of ARDS across the lifespan. Additionally, we discuss in detail the different management strategies used for each subtype of ARDS and spotlight how these strategies were applied to mitigate poor outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review is geared toward both clinicians and clinician-scientists as it not only summarizes the latest information on disease pathogenesis and patient management in ARDS across the lifespan but also highlights knowledge gaps for further investigative efforts. We conclude by projecting how future studies can fill these gaps in research and what improvements may be envisioned in the management of NARDS and PARDS based on the current breadth of literature on adult ARDS treatment strategies.

Skin Rash with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Chronic Miliary Tuberculosis: The Role of HRCT Thorax and Bronchoscopy as Diagnostic Tools

Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in India, presenting with diverse clinical and radiological manifestations such as consolidation, cavitation, lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, miliary TB, and endobronchial TB. While acute miliary TB presenting as Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is documented, the association with a skin rash mimicking viral exanthematous fever is not. This case report describes the case of a 41-year-old male patient with acute dyspnea, a maculopapular rash, and lung infiltrates on chest radiograph, initially diagnosed with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and later confirmed as ARDS. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) thorax revealed consolidation with nodules and a characteristic butterfly pattern sparing the apices and bases. Bronchoscopy confirmed TB etiology through MTB genome in BAL samples. The patient improved significantly with intravenous antibiotics, steroids, and HFNC, leading to a documented cure after 6 months of anti-tuberculosis treatment. This report highlights the importance of considering TB in cases with nodular consolidation and positive limiting signs and recommends ICU bronchoscopy as a reliable diagnostic tool. The Kigali modification for ARDS definition was instrumental in managing this case. Use of Kigali modification for defining ARDS in resource limited setting guided management in our case.

New 2023 global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: progress and limitation

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents a challenge in clinical diagnosis as it lacks a definitive gold standard. Over the past 55 years, there have been several revisions to the definition of ARDS. With the progress of clinical practice and scientific research, the limitations of the "Berlin definition" have become increasingly evident. In response to these changes, the 2023 global definition of ARDS aims to address these issues by expanding the diagnostic targets, chest imaging, and methods for assessing hypoxia. Additionally, the new definition increases the diagnostic criteria to accommodate resource-constrained settings. The expansion facilitates early identification and treatment interventions for ARDS, thereby advancing epidemiological and clinically related research. Nevertheless, the broad nature of this revision may include patients who do not actually have ARDS, thus raising the risk of false-positive diagnoses. Therefore, additional verification is crucial to ascertain the validity and accuracy of the 2023 global definition of ARDS.

Use of Lung Ultrasound in the New Definitions of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Increases the Occurrence Rate of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

To assess the effect of incorporating bilateral abnormalities as detected by lung ultrasound (LUS) in the Kigali modification and the New Global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on the occurrence rate of ARDS. Post hoc analysis of a previously published prospective cohort study. An academic mixed medical-surgical ICU. The original study included critically ill adults with any opacity on chest radiography in whom subsequent LUS was performed. Patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition, COVID-19 patients and patients with major thorax trauma were excluded. None. LUS was performed within 24 hours of chest radiography and the presence of unilateral and bilateral abnormalities on LUS and chest radiograph (opacities) was scored. Subsequently, the Kigali modification and the New Global definition of ARDS were applied by two independent researchers on the patients with newly found bilateral opacities. Of 120 patients, 116 were included in this post hoc analysis. Thirty-three patients had bilateral opacities on LUS and unilateral opacities on chest radiograph. Fourteen of these patients had ARDS according to the Kigali modification and 12 had ARDS according to the New Global definition. The detected LUS patterns were significantly different between patients with and without ARDS ( p = 0.004). An A-profile with a positive PosteroLateral Alveolar and/or Pleural Syndrome was most prevalent in patients without ARDS, whereas heterogeneous and mixed A, B, and C patterns were most prevalent in patients with ARDS. The addition of bilateral abnormalities as detected by LUS to the Kigali modification and the New Global definition increases the occurrence rate of the ARDS. The nomenclature for LUS needs to be better defined as LUS patterns differ between patients with and without ARDS. Incorporating well-defined LUS criteria can increase specificity and sensitivity of new ARDS definitions.

Updated Guidelines for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for 10% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit and 23% of patients using mechanical ventilation, with a mortality rate of 45% in severe cases. The perception that patients with ARDS are vulnerable to ventilator-induced lung injury has led to lung-protective ventilation strategies. Accordingly, the American Thoracic Society, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), and the Society of Critical Care Medicine announced ARDS mechanical ventilation guidelines in 2017. Since then, based on the results of newly reported research and data accumulated throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the ESICM announced an amendment to the previous guidelines in 2023. The revised ARDS guidelines discuss extending the ARDS definition and its phenotypes that were not mentioned in the previous guidelines. The new guidelines encompass ventilation strategies, including positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. In addition, various oxygenation devices, such as high-flow nasal cannulated oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure in nonmechanically ventilated patients, are introduced. This review discusses new changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ARDS based on the new ESICM guidelines, providing a supportive background and rationale.

The perinatal period should be considered in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison of the Montreux definition vs. the second pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference definition.

The recently developed Montreux definition for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) partially differs from the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) definition. Here, we compare the Montreux and PALICC-2 definitions regarding morbidity, mortality, and prognosis of neonatal cases of ARDS in order to evaluate which definition is more appropriate for newborns. Neonates admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit between 1 January 2018 and 30 September 2019 who met the Montreux or PALICC-2 definition of neonatal ARDS were retrospectively analyzed (n = 472). One comparison was made between application of the Montreux and PALICC-2 definitions to neonates outside the perinatal period (> 7 d after birth). A second comparison was made between a diagnosis of neonatal ARDS within (≤ 7 d of birth) and outside (> 7 d after birth) the perinatal period using the Montreux definition. No significant differences in morbidity, mortality, severity, therapies, or prognosis were observed between neonates in the extra perinatal group according to the Montreux and PALICC-2 definitions. However, epidemiology, clinical course, and prognosis of neonatal ARDS within the perinatal period did differ from those outside the perinatal period according to the Montreux definition. Neonates with ARDS within the perinatal period have unique triggers, epidemiology, clinical course, and prognosis, yet a similar pathobiology pattern, to neonates at other ages. Therefore, it may be essential to consider the perinatal period when defining neonatal ARDS.

Evaluating construct validity of computable acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in adults hospitalized with COVID-19: an electronic health records based approach

BackgroundEvolving ARDS epidemiology and management during COVID-19 have prompted calls to reexamine the construct validity of Berlin criteria, which have been rarely evaluated in real-world data. We developed a Berlin ARDS definition (EHR-Berlin) computable in electronic health records (EHR) to (1) assess its construct validity, and (2) assess how expanding its criteria affected validity.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary care hospitals with one EHR, among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 February 2020-March 2021. We assessed five candidate definitions for ARDS: the EHR-Berlin definition modeled on Berlin criteria, and four alternatives informed by recent proposals to expand criteria and include patients on high-flow oxygen (EHR-Alternative 1), relax imaging criteria (EHR-Alternatives 2–3), and extend timing windows (EHR-Alternative 4). We evaluated two aspects of construct validity for the EHR-Berlin definition: (1) criterion validity: agreement with manual ARDS classification by experts, available in 175 patients; (2) predictive validity: relationships with hospital mortality, assessed by Pearson r and by area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). We assessed predictive validity and timing of identification of EHR-Berlin definition compared to alternative definitions.ResultsAmong 765 patients, mean (SD) age was 57 (18) years and 471 (62%) were male. The EHR-Berlin definition classified 171 (22%) patients as ARDS, which had high agreement with manual classification (kappa 0.85), and was associated with mortality (Pearson r = 0.39; AUROC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68, 0.77). In comparison, EHR-Alternative 1 classified 219 (29%) patients as ARDS, maintained similar relationships to mortality (r = 0.40; AUROC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70, 0.79, Delong test P = 0.14), and identified patients earlier in their hospitalization (median 13 vs. 15 h from admission, Wilcoxon signed-rank test P < 0.001). EHR-Alternative 3, which removed imaging criteria, had similar correlation (r = 0.41) but better discrimination for mortality (AUROC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72, 0.80; P = 0.036), and identified patients median 2 h (P < 0.001) from admission.ConclusionsThe EHR-Berlin definition can enable ARDS identification with high criterion validity, supporting large-scale study and surveillance. There are opportunities to expand the Berlin criteria that preserve predictive validity and facilitate earlier identification.

A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Background: Since publication of the 2012 Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), several developments have supported the need for an expansion of the definition, including the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, the expansion of the use of pulse oximetry in place of arterial blood gases, the use of ultrasound for chest imaging, and the need for applicability in resource-limited settings. Methods: A consensus conference of 32 critical care ARDS experts was convened, had six virtual meetings (June 2021 to March 2022), and subsequently obtained input from members of several critical care societies. The goal was to develop a definition that would 1) identify patients with the currently accepted conceptual framework for ARDS, 2) facilitate rapid ARDS diagnosis for clinical care and research, 3) be applicable in resource-limited settings, 4) be useful for testing specific therapies, and 5) be practical for communication to patients and caregivers. Results: The committee made four main recommendations: 1) include high-flow nasal oxygen with a minimum flow rate of ⩾30 L/min; 2) use PaO2:FiO2 ⩽ 300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry SpO2:FiO2 ⩽ 315 (if oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry is ⩽97%) to identify hypoxemia; 3) retain bilateral opacities for imaging criteria but add ultrasound as an imaging modality, especially in resource-limited areas; and 4) in resource-limited settings, do not require positive end-expiratory pressure, oxygen flow rate, or specific respiratory support devices. Conclusions: We propose a new global definition of ARDS that builds on the Berlin definition. The recommendations also identify areas for future research, including the need for prospective assessments of the feasibility, reliability, and prognostic validity of the proposed global definition.

Broadening the Berlin definition of ARDS to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen: an observational study in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19

BackgroundHigh-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is uncertain whether a broadened Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which ARDS can be diagnosed in patients who are not receiving ventilation, results in similar groups of patients receiving HFNO as in patients receiving ventilation.MethodsWe applied a broadened definition of ARDS in a multicenter, observational study in adult critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), wherein the requirement for a minimal level of 5 cm H2O PEEP with ventilation is replaced by a minimal level of airflow rate with HFNO, and compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients receiving HFNO and patients receiving ventilation. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality. We also compared outcomes in risk for death groups using the PaO2/FiO2 cutoffs as used successfully in the original definition of ARDS. Secondary endpoints were hospital mortality; mortality on days 28 and 90; need for ventilation within 7 days in patients that started with HFNO; the number of days free from HFNO or ventilation; and ICU and hospital length of stay.ResultsOf 728 included patients, 229 patients started with HFNO and 499 patients with ventilation. All patients fulfilled the broadened Berlin definition of ARDS. Patients receiving HFNO had lower disease severity scores and lower PaO2/FiO2 than patients receiving ventilation. ICU mortality was lower in receiving HFNO (22.7 vs 35.6%; p = 0.001). Using PaO2/FiO2 cutoffs for mild, moderate and severe arterial hypoxemia created groups with an ICU mortality of 16.7%, 22.0%, and 23.5% (p = 0.906) versus 19.1%, 37.9% and 41.4% (p = 0.002), in patients receiving HFNO versus patients receiving ventilation, respectively.ConclusionsUsing a broadened definition of ARDS may facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ARDS in patients receiving HFNO; however, ARDS patients receiving HFNO and ARDS patients receiving ventilation have distinct baseline characteristics and mortality rates.Trial registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04719182).

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels in Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels in Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

A Web-Based Platform for the Automatic Stratification of ARDS Severity

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), including severe pulmonary COVID infection, is associated with a high mortality rate. It is crucial to detect ARDS early, as a late diagnosis may lead to serious complications in treatment. One of the challenges in ARDS diagnosis is chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation. ARDS causes diffuse infiltrates through the lungs that must be identified using chest radiography. In this paper, we present a web-based platform leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically assess pediatric ARDS (PARDS) using CXR images. Our system computes a severity score to identify and grade ARDS in CXR images. Moreover, the platform provides an image highlighting the lung fields, which can be utilized for prospective AI-based systems. A deep learning (DL) approach is employed to analyze the input data. A novel DL model, named Dense-Ynet, is trained using a CXR dataset in which clinical specialists previously labelled the two halves (upper and lower) of each lung. The assessment results show that our platform achieves a recall rate of 95.25% and a precision of 88.02%. The web platform, named PARDS-CxR, assigns severity scores to input CXR images that are compatible with current definitions of ARDS and PARDS. Once it has undergone external validation, PARDS-CxR will serve as an essential component in a clinical AI framework for diagnosing ARDS.

Usefulness and limitations of the acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in non-intubated patients. A narrative review.

According to the Berlin Definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of at least 5 cmH2O is required to diagnose and grade ARDS. While the Berlin consensus statement specifically acknowledges the role of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in mild ARDS, this stratification has traditionally presumed a mechanically ventilated patient in the context of moderate to severe ARDS. This may not accurately reflect today's reality of clinical respiratory care. NIV and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNO) have been used for managing of severe forms of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with growing frequency, including in patients showing pathophysiological signs of ARDS. This became especially relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. The levels of PEEP achieved with HFNO have been particularly controversial, and the exact FiO2 it achieves is subject to variability. Pinpointing the presence of ARDS in patients receiving HNFO and the severity in those receiving NIV therefore remains methodically problematic. This narrative review highlights the evolution of the ARDS definition in the context of non-invasive ventilatory support and provides an overview of the parallel development of definitions and ventilatory management of ARDS. It summarizes the methodology applied in clinical trials to classify ARDS in non-intubated patients and the respective consequences on treatment. As ARDS severity has significant therapeutic and prognostic consequences, and earlier treatment in non-intubated patients may be beneficial, closing this knowledge gap may ultimately be a relevant step to improve comparability in clinical trial design and outcomes.

Challenges in ARDS Definition, Management, and Identification of Effective Personalized Therapies.

Over the last decade, the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has made considerable progress both regarding supportive and pharmacologic therapies. Lung protective mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of ARDS management. Current recommendations on mechanical ventilation in ARDS include the use of low tidal volume (VT) 4-6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressure (PPLAT) < 30 cmH2O, and driving pressure (∆P) < 14 cmH2O. Moreover, positive end-expiratory pressure should be individualized. Recently, variables such as mechanical power and transpulmonary pressure seem promising for limiting ventilator-induced lung injury and optimizing ventilator settings. Rescue therapies such as recruitment maneuvers, vasodilators, prone positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal have been considered for patients with severe ARDS. Regarding pharmacotherapies, despite more than 50 years of research, no effective treatment has yet been found. However, the identification of ARDS sub-phenotypes has revealed that some pharmacologic therapies that have failed to provide benefits when considering all patients with ARDS can show beneficial effects when these patients were stratified into specific sub-populations; for example, those with hyperinflammation/hypoinflammation. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview on current advances in the management of ARDS from mechanical ventilation to pharmacological treatments, including personalized therapy.

Comparison of the Montreux definition with the Berlin definition for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome.

To compare the similarities and differences between the Montreux definition and the Berlin definition in terms of the prevalence, mortality, and complications of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We retrospectively analyzed the data of neonates with respiratory failure treated in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 1 November 2019 and 31 December 2021. In total, 554 infants had neonatal ARDS (524 infants, Montreux definition; 549 infants, Berlin definition). The prevalence (3.1% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.438) and mortality (18.9% vs.18.0%, p = 0.716) of neonatal ARDS did not differ between the definitions. Among the 519 infants meeting both definitions, key clinical outcomes did not differ between the definitions such as ventilation duration, NICU stay, complication rates, and antibiotic use, except for nitric oxide inhalation. The Montreux and Berlin definitions identified an additional 5 and 30 patients, respectively, not captured by the other definition. The rate of inhaled nitric oxide treatment (20.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.013), air leaks (20.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.013), and invasive ventilation duration (110.00 vs.0.00h, p = 0.002) significantly differed between the above two groups. Sixty-two patients had moderate and severe ARDS according to the Montreux and Berlin definitions, respectively. The rates of adverse outcomes (e.g., mortality, invasive ventilation time) among these patients were similar to the rates among patients with moderate ARDS according to both definitions than among patients with severe ARDS according to both definitions. Conclusion: The prevalence, mortality, and most complications of neonatal ARDS were similar between the Montreux and Berlin definitions, which mainly differed in terms of the severity of neonatal ARDS. What is Known: • The Montreux definition was first proposed for the diagnosis of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome and was established in 2017. To date, the Montreux definition has not been compared with other diagnostic definitions of ARDS. What is New: • The study suggests that perinatal lung disease need not be excluded in the diagnosis of neonatal ARDS, and that the Montreux definition is more applicable to neonates, taking into account their specific physiological characteristics.

Rethinking Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome after COVID-19: If a "Better" Definition Is the Answer, What Is the Question?

The definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a somewhat controversial history, with some even questioning the need for the term "ARDS." This controversy has been amplified by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic given the marked increase in the incidence of ARDS, the relatively new treatment modalities that do not fit neatly with the Berlin definition, and the difficulty of making the diagnosis in resource-limited settings. We propose that attempts to revise the definition of ARDS should apply the framework originally developed by psychologists and social scientists and used by other medical disciplines to generate and assess definitions of clinical syndromes that do not have gold standards. This framework is structured around measures of reliability, feasibility, and validity. Future revisions of the definition of ARDS should contain the purpose, the methodology, and the framework for empirically testing any proposed definition. Attempts to revise critical illness syndromes' definitions usually hope to make them "better"; our recommendation is that future attempts use the same criteria used by other fields in defining what "better" means.

Clinical characteristics of new-onset acute kidney injury in patients with established acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective single-center post hoc observational study.

BackgroundWe assessed the incidence and clinical characteristics of acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients and its effect on clinical outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a single-center prospective longitudinal study. Patients who met the Berlin definition of ARDS in the medical ICU in China-Japan Friendship Hospital from March 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, were included. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO clinical practice guidelines. Early and late AKI were defined as AKI occurring within 48 h after ARDS was diagnosed or after 48 h, respectively.ResultsOf the 311 ARDS patients, 161 (51.8%) developed AKI after ICU admission. Independent risk factors for AKI in ARDS patients were age (OR 1.027, 95% CI 1.009–1.045), a history of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.110, 95%CI 1.100–4.046) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 9.328, 95%CI 2.393–36.363), APACHE II score (OR 1.049, 95%CI 1.008–1.092), average lactate level in the first 3 days (OR 1.965, 95%CI 1.287–3.020) and using ECMO support (OR 2.359, 95%CI 1.154–4.824). Early AKI was found in 91 (56.5%) patients and late AKI was found in 70 (43.5%). Early AKI was related to the patient’s underlying disease and the severity of hospital admission, while late AKI was related to the application of nephrotoxic drugs. The mortality rate of ARDS combined with AKI was 57.1%, which was independently associated with shock (OR 54.943, 95%CI 9.751–309.573).ConclusionA significant number of patients with ARDS developed AKI, and the mortality rate for ARDS patients was significantly higher when combined with AKI. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be routinely used to avoid drug toxicity during treatment.

An expanded definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: Challenging the status quo

Although the Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 2012 has been widely used in clinical practice, issues have occasionally been raised regarding various criteria since it was proposed. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is widely used for effective respiratory support in acute respiratory failure. As patients who do not require ventilation but meet the Berlin criteria have similar characteristics to those with ARDS, the definition of ARDS may be broadened to include patients receiving HFNO. As the PaO2/FiO2 under-recognizes the diagnosis of ARDS, a SpO2/FiO2 value of ≤315 may be considered instead of a PaO2/FiO2 value of ≤300 for diagnosing the condition in resource-constrained settings. In this context, patients with severe COVID-19 always meet other criteria for ARDS except for 7-day acute onset. Therefore, the timeframe for the onset of ARDS may be extended to up to 14 days. An expanded definition of ARDS may allow early identification of patients with less severe diseases and facilitate testing and application of new therapies in patients with a high risk of poor outcomes. Here, we discuss the major controversies regarding the extension of the ARDS definition with a view to improving clinical implementation and patient outcomes.

Effect of prone position in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe application of prone position (PP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is controversial.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of application of PP during VV-ECMO in patients with ARDS.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study of patients who met the Berlin definition of ARDS, and were supported with VV-ECMO. We divided the patients into two groups. The prone group included patients who were supported by VV-ECMO, and experienced at least one period of PP, while those without PP during VV-ECMO were defined as the supine group. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 was introduced to minimize potential confounders. The primary outcomes were the complications of PP and the change of arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of the inspiration (PaO2/FiO2) ratio after PP. The secondary outcomes were hospital survival, ICU survival, and ECMO weaning rate.ResultsFrom April 2013 to October 2020, a total of 91 patients met the diagnostic criteria of ARDS who were supported with ECMO. 38 patients (41.8%) received at least one period of PP during ECMO, while 53 patients (58.2%) were maintained in supine position during ECMO. 22 minor complications were reported in the prone group and major complications were not found. The other ECMO-related complications were similar between two groups. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly improved after PP compared with before (174.50 (132.40–228.25) mmHg vs. 158.00 (122.93–210.33) mmHg, p < 0.001). PSM selected 25 pairs of patients with similar characteristics. Hospital survival or ICU survival did not differ between the two groups (40% vs. 28%, p = 0.370; 40% vs. 32%, p = 0.556). Significant difference of ECMO weaning rate between two groups was not found (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.087).ConclusionsPP during VV-ECMO was safe and could improve oxygenation. A large-scale and well-designed RCT is needed in the future.