Definitive Ulcer Research Articles

Omentopexy versus falciformopexy for peptic ulcer perforation.

Open or laparoscopic Graham's omentopexy is frequently used in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). The technical difficulty of applying the omental plug, especially in patients with previous omentum resection, has led to the use of falciform ligament for the PUP, and some studies have reported that PUP may even be a more advantageous technique than omentopexy. Here, in this study, we aimed to compare the retrospective results of patients who underwent falciformopexy or omentopexy for PUP. Between 1999 and 2018, 303 patients who were followed-up and treated for PUP were included in this study. Patients who had malignancy, gastric resection, definitive ulcer surgery, laparoscopic surgery and nonoperative treatment were excluded from this study. In the remaining patients, either open ometopexy or falciformopexy were applied based on the surgeon's choice. These two techniques were compared for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Falciformopexy (n=46) and omentopexy (n=243) groups had similar demographics, but ASA scores were lower in the falciformopexy group. For ulcer size and localization, duration of operation, no difference was found between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups concerning general postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, atelectasis was more frequently observed in the omentopexy group, whereas the pexia failure was more frequent in the falciformopexy group (2.6% and 8.7%, p=0.04). Falciformopexy is an alternative technique that can be used in situations where it is not possible to use the omentum. Falciformopexy is not superior to omentopexy for the repair of the PUP.

Endoscopic Therapeutic Approach for Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Long-standing intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) induces dysplastic change in the intestinal mucosa and increases the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. The evolving endoscopic techniques and technologies, including dye spraying methods and high-definition images, have been replacing random biopsies and have been revealed as more practical and efficient for detection of dysplasia in IBD patients. In addition, they have potential usefulness in detailed characterization of lesions and in the assessment of endoscopic resectability. Most dysplastic lesions without an unclear margin, definite ulceration, non-lifting sign, and high index of malignant change with suspicion for lymph node or distant metastases can be removed endoscopically. However, endoscopic resection of dysplasia in chronic IBD patients is usually difficult because it is often complicated by submucosal fibrosis. In patients with dysplasias that demonstrate submucosa fibrosis or a large size (≥20 mm), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or ESD with snaring (simplified or hybrid ESD) is an alternative option and may avoid a colectomy. However, a standardized endoscopic therapeutic approach for dysplasia in IBD has not been established yet, and dedicated specialized endoscopists with interest in IBD are needed to fully investigate recent emerging techniques and technologies.

Perforated duodenal ulcer; management in a resource poor, semi-urban Nigerian hospital

Introduction:Perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU) is still seen frequently in the study center inspite of the free use of effective medical curative therapy. We then set out to ascertain the pattern of presentation, peculiar risk factors in the study environment, re-evaluate our method of management, and to see if it is adequate for patients in a developing country.Materials and Methods:This is a retrospective study of patients admitted and managed for PDUs, between January 2004 and December 2011 at the Federal Medical Centre, IdoEkiti, Southwest Nigeria. The records of patients were retrieved and demographic data relating to age, sex, symptoms, duration, diagnosis, intra-operative findings, and management outcome were extracted. The results were analyzed.Results:A total of 30 patients were admitted and operated during this period. Twenty-eight of them were males and two were females. The mean age was 47 years and the male: female ratio was 14:1. The duration of symptoms before presentation ranged from 2 to 7 days. None of the patients had a prior diagnosis of their ulcers, by an upper gastro intestinal endoscopy before presentation; although most had dyspeptic symptoms, with inadequate or no medical treatment. The notable peculiar risk factor was the abuse of local herbal concoction for body pains by all the patients. Seven patients smokes, 15 consumes alcohol, and only two take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for body pains. Most of the managed patients; 26 were satisfactorily discharged home and later followed-up at the surgical out-patient department. Four mortality was recorded during the period of study.Conclusion:PDU is still a major complication of chronic peptic ulcer disease. Simple omental patch and H. pylori eradication is no longer appropriate as a mode of treatment for the youths who are mostly affected in the center. We therefore, suggest a more wide spread use of definitive ulcer surgery for most of our patients with no pre-operative risk factors.

Acute Perforated Duodenal Ulcer in Maiduguri: Experience with Simple Closure and <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Eradication

Effective medical management of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has reduced the incidence of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) as a complication, but perforation especially in the elderly remains unchanged and is in fact on the increase. There is a changing trend in emergency surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU) from definitive anti ulcer surgery to simple closure followed by Helicobacter pylori eradication. To present our experience in managing PDU with simple closure followed by Helicobacter pylori eradication. This was a chart review of patients managed for PDU over a nine year period (Jan 1999 to Dec 2007) using information obtained from ward admission registers, theatre operation registers, and patients case files from the medical records department. The patients biodata, clinical, and operative findings as well as treatment outcome were extracted for analysis. Of 55 patients eligible for analysis, 44 (80%) were males and 11(20%) females (M to F, 4:1). Their ages ranged between 18 and 65 years with a mean(SD) of 39.9 (13.5) years. Most of the patients, 34 (61.8%), were below 40 years of age and majority 39(71.0%) had a history suggestive of chronic peptic ulcer disease. Twenty six (47.3%) patients presented within 24 hours of perforation, while nine (16.4%) presented more than 72 hours afterwards. The latter group accounted for most, five(55.6%), of the mortality. All the perforations were anterior pyloroduodenal and all except one had simple closure with omental patch followed by a course of a proton pump inhibitor and Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Simple closure with omental patch followed by Helicobacter pylori eradication is effective in managing PDU with low morbidity and mortality despite patients late presentation in our center. This technique is recommended in place of a definitive ulcer surgery.

Experience with Acute Perforated Duodenal Ulcer in a West African Population

The advent of proton pump inhibitors and helicobacter pylori eradication in the management of chronic peptic ulcer disease has reduced the operative treatment of this condition to its complications. Perforated duodenal ulcer remains a major life threatening complication of chronic peptic ulcer disease. This retrospective study reviews our experience at the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital. All patients with clinical diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer seen in this hospital between June 2003 and October 2005 were included in this study. Data extracted from their hospital records were analyzed for age, sex, duration of symptoms, previous history of peptic ulcer disease, use of NSAIDS, main presenting features, investigations, resuscitative measures, time of surgery, operative findings, and type of surgery offered, complications and mortality. After resuscitation, laparotomy followed by simple closure or definitive ulcer surgery and helicobacter pylori eradication therapy was given to all the patients. Duration of follow up ranged 8 to 12 months with endoscopy in some patients. There were 41 patients with intraoperative diagnosis of acute perforated duodenal ulcer seen over the study period, comprising 34 males (82.9%) and 7 females (17.1%), a male female ratio of 4.8:1, age range of 18-77 years and a mean age of 45.49 +/- 14.46 years. Previous history of peptic ulcer disease was found in 32 (78.6%) of the patient and the main presenting features were sudden onset of severe abdominal pain in 95.1% of cases and fever in 65.8%. Features of frank peritonitis were demonstrable in all the patients and 11 (26.8%) presented in shock. Plain chest x-rays demonstrated gas under the diaphragm in 21(65.6%) of the patients. After adequate resuscitation, all the patients underwent laparotomy where the abdomen was explored, the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer was confirmed and 29 (70.7%) had simple closure of the perforation with omentum (after Graham). The average time between presentation and surgery was 9 hours (range 6-11 hours). The mean size of perforation was 10.5 mm (range 5-15 mm). Definitive peptic ulcer surgery was done in 12 (29.3%) patients. 8 had truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty. The major complications included wound infection in 14 (34.1%), postoperative fever in 16 (39.0%) and prolonged ileus in 15 (36.6%) There were 7 deaths, mortality rate of 17.1% and the causes of death included severe electrolyte imbalance in 1 and gram negative septicaemia and shock in 6. The average duration of hospital stay was 10 days (range 8-36). Perforated duodenal ulcer is a major complication of chronic peptic ulcer disease. Simple omental patch by open method and helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is sufficient to prevent reperforation.

Omental Gastrotomy Closure - Model for a NOTES Graham Patch

Open or laparoscopic omental patching (Graham patch) is considered a safe and effective treatment for perforated peptic ulcer disease. As the paradigms for definitive ulcer treatment have shifted since the introduction of H.pylori treatment, omental patching is often the only surgical intervention necessary. We wanted to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic omental patching in the NOTES model. Methods: Five 50 kg Yorkshire Swine underwent endoscopy and anterior wall gastrotomy with a needle knife and balloon dilation followed by 90 minutes of peritoneoscopy. At the conclusion of the peritoneoscopy a patch of omentum was transferred into the gastrotomy and fixed with hemoclips to the gastric mucosa. Swine were fed pig chow on postoperative day 1 and survival assessed at 14 days. The study was approved by the IACUC. Results: All procedures were successfully completed and appeared technically easier than hemoclip gastrotomy closure. One animal succumbed to airway loss in the immediate post-operative period. All other animals survived and thrived to postoperative day 14. At necropsy, all gastrotomy sites were well healed with minimal omental adhesions and no abdominal infections. Conclusion: In this small animal study the endoscopic omental patching using the NOTES concept appeared feasible, safe and effective. Its therapeutic utility for gastrotomies and perforations in humans should be further investigated.

Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think

Background The frequency of surgery for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has decreased dramatically during the last 3 decades. The purpose of this study was to characterize the Veteran patients undergoing surgery for peptic ulcer disease in a modern series and to examine the effect of H. plylori status on surgical outcome and recurrence of PUD. Methods An Institutional Review Board–approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing operations for peptic ulcer disease during a 66-month period at a single Veterans Administration medical center was performed. Patient records were examined for demographics, medication use, Helicobacter pylori status, operative details, and surgical outcomes. Results From January 1999 to July 2004, 43 of 128 upper gastrointestinal operations were performed for PUD. Thirty-five operations (81%) were performed for bleeding or perforated ulcers, and 26 (60%) patients had no history of PUD. The mean age was 60 years, and 66% of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4; 47% were Helicobacter pylori positive, and 54% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medication. Hospital mortality was 23%. By univariate analysis, emergent surgery, higher ASA status, H. pylori status, and absence of a history of ulcer disease were risk factors for mortality ( P <.05). Only 36% underwent definitive ulcer surgery. With a median follow-up of 18 months, there has been only 1 single recurrence (3%). Conclusions PUD still accounts for 33% of all gastroduodenal surgery performed in a Veterans Administration medical center. The majority of these operations are emergent operations in high-risk patients. In this era of effective acid suppression and H. pylori treatment, definitive ulcer surgery in the emergent setting may not be necessary.

Management of perforated duodenal ulcer in a resource poor environment.

The majority of literature on the management of perforated duodenal ulcer comes from the west. However, this is not necessarily appropriate in the developing world where perforated ulcers occur in younger patients, there is a strong association with cigarette smoking, and presentation is often delayed. An attempt to guide management of perforated duodenal ulcer in the developing world using the best evidence available. Review of the literature on perforated ulcers and retrospective chart review of cases from a rural African hospital. Relevant studies from the western and developing world literature. Med-line search. Assessment of relevance to clinical management of perforated duodenal ulcers in the developing world. Due to recognition of Helicobacter pylori (HP) as a causative agent in duodenal ulcer disease many western surgeons are questioning the need for definitive ulcer surgery in the acute management of perforated duodenal ulceration. This philosophy may not be appropriate in the developing world due to poor HP eradication rates, conditions fostering re-infection with HP, problems with patient compliance in taking medications, and difficulties with follow-up. It is suggested that selected patients, without preoperative risk factors, are offered definitive surgery but those at any risk of postoperative mortality be treated with conservative surgery and treatment for HP. These patients will have to be followed closely to check ulcer healing. Attention will also need to be paid to stopping smoking.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer perforations.

Most patients with chronic peptic ulcer disease have Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In the past, immediate acid-reduction surgery has been strongly advocated for perforated peptic ulcers because of the high incidence of ulcer relapse after simple closure. Simple oversewing procedures either by an open or laparoscopic approach together with H. pylori eradication appear to supersede definitive ulcer surgery. In 47 consecutive patients (mean age = 64 years, range 27-91) suffering from acute peptic ulcer perforation the preoperative presence of H. pylori (CLO test), the surgical procedure (laparoscopy or open surgery), the outcome of surgery, and the success of H. pylori eradication with a triple regimen were prospectively studied. Of these patients 73.3% were positive for H. pylori, regardless of the previous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Thirty-eight per cent underwent a simple laparoscopic repair. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached a high of 32%. The main reasons for conversion were the size of the ulcer, and/or diffuse peritonitis for a duration of over 12 hours with fibrous membranes difficult to remove laparoscopically. In the H. pylori positive patients, eradication was successful in 96% of the cases. Mortality and morbidity rates were greater in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.05). Follow-up (median 43.5 months) revealed no need for reoperation for peptic ulcer disease and no mortality. We have found a high prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. An immediate and appropriate H. pylori eradication therapy for perforated peptic ulcers reduces the relapse rate after simple closure. Response rate to a triple eradication protocol was excellent in the hospital setting.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer perforations.

Most patients with chronic peptic ulcer disease have Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In the past, immediate acid-reduction surgery has been strongly advocated for perforated peptic ulcers because of the high incidence of ulcer relapse after simple closure. Simple oversewing procedures either by an open or laparoscopic approach together with H. pylori eradication appear to supersede definitive ulcer surgery. In 47 consecutive patients (mean age = 64 years, range 27-91) suffering from acute peptic ulcer perforation the preoperative presence of H. pylori (CLO test), the surgical procedure (laparoscopy or open surgery), the outcome of surgery, and the success of H. pylori eradication with a triple regimen were prospectively studied. Of these patients 73.3% were positive for H. pylori, regardless of the previous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Thirty-eight per cent underwent a simple laparoscopic repair. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached a high of 32%. The main reasons for conversion were the size of the ulcer, and/or diffuse peritonitis for a duration of over 12 hours with fibrous membranes difficult to remove laparoscopically. In the H. pylori positive patients, eradication was successful in 96% of the cases. Mortality and morbidity rates were greater in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.05). Follow-up (median 43.5 months) revealed no need for reoperation for peptic ulcer disease and no mortality. We have found a high prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. An immediate and appropriate H. pylori eradication therapy for perforated peptic ulcers reduces the relapse rate after simple closure. Response rate to a triple eradication protocol was excellent in the hospital setting.

Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today--indication, technique and outcome.

The current surgical management of peptic ulcer disease and its outcome have been reviewed. Today, surgery for peptic ulcer disease is largely restricted to the treatment of complications. In peptic ulcer perforation, a conservative treatment trial can be given in selected cases. If laparotomy is necessary, simple closure is sufficient in the large majority of cases, and definitive ulcer surgery to reduce gastric acid secretion is no longer justified in these patients. Laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer has failed to prove to be a significant advantage over open surgery. In bleeding peptic ulcers, definitive hemostasis can be achieved by endoscopic treatment in more than 90% of cases. In 1-2% of cases, immediate emergency surgery is necessary. Some ulcers have a high risk of re-bleeding, and early elective surgery might be advisable. Surgical bleeding control can be achieved by direct suture and extraluminal ligation of the gastroduodenal artery or by gastric resection. Benign gastric outlet obstruction can be controlled by endoscopic balloon dilatation in 70% of cases, but gastrojejunostomy or gastric resection are necessary in about 30% of cases. Elective surgery for peptic ulcer disease has been largely abandoned, and bleeding or obstructing ulcers can be managed safely by endoscopic treatment in most cases. However, surgeons will continue to encounter patients with peptic ulcer disease for emergency surgery. Currently, laparoscopic surgery has no proven advantage in peptic ulcer surgery.

Perforated Peptic Ulcer following Gastric Bypass for Obesity

Peptic ulcer in the excluded segment of a gastric bypass performed in the management of morbid obesity has only rarely been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with the condition in a series of 4300 patients who underwent gastric-restrictive surgery between 1978 and 1997. Eleven patients presented with acute perforation of a peptic ulcer in the excluded gastric segment. Nine ulcers were duodenal, one was gastric, and one patient had both gastric and duodenal perforations. The time between primary gastric-restrictive surgery and ulcer perforation varied from 20 days to 12 years. All patients presented with upper abdominal pain. The classical radiological sign of perforated peptic ulcer, free air under the diaphragm, did not occur in any patient. Nine patients were initially treated by primary closure of the perforation with subsequent definitive ulcer therapy by vagotomy, pyloroplasty, or gastrectomy. One case, initially treated elsewhere, was managed by placement of a Malecot catheter through the duodenal perforation, gastrostomy, and peritoneal drainage. One recent case remains symptom-free on H2 blockers after simple closure. There was no mortality. Six cases were previously reported in the literature with a 33 per cent mortality rate.

Gasless Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: A Case Report

Ruptured duodenal peptic ulcer is a serious complication of ulcer disease that occurs in approximately 5% of cases. Its emergency treatment is based on surgery, namely, simple closure or more definitive ulcer surgery. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer with classic insufflation of CO2 is quick, simple, and technically feasible in most patients. We describe herein the operative treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer in a 33-year-old man who presented to our Hospital with acute onset of severe abdominal pain. Wide peritoneal lavage and suture of the perforation was performed by gasless laparoscopic technique using a mechanical retractor obviating the creation of the pneumoperitoneum and of the sealed environment. This new approach enables the use of conventional instruments and provides a clear field of vision in the abdomen equal to that created by the traditional CO2 technique. Because there is not a pneumoperitoneum to maintain, the gasless technique permits a constant irrigation and suction of the abdominal cavity, a wide peritoneal lavage, and the continuous suction of fluid, blood, smoke, and humidity without losing the camera set. If indicated, it permits the laparoscopic repair of the perforation combined with the laparoscopic vagotomy in the same emergency setting. The present case proved it to be another abdominal procedure that can be carried out with all the technical and anesthesiological advantages of gasless minimally invasive surgery.

Do perforated duodenal ulcers need an aciddecreasing surgical procedure now that omeprazole is available?

If a chronic duodenal ulcer perforates, the choice of operation will depend on the patient's condition. Preoperative shock, concurrent medical diseases, severe generalized peritonitis, or the presence of an intra-abdominal abscess are contraindications to a definitive ulcer operation; hence, simple closure or omental patch closure is performed. Omeprazole can then be used to heal the ulcer in the early postoperative period, with long-term H2-blocker therapy to follow. The patient without a contraindication to a definitive operation should have a proximal gastric vagotomy in addition to an omental patch closure of the perforation. The addition of this procedure does not change the operative mortality rate in properly selected patients, does not cause the gastrointestinal sequelae associated with truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty or resection, and has a low rate of recurrent ulcer in experienced hands. The presence of a synchronous posterior "kissing" duodenal ulcer would prompt some to choose a vagotomy and pyloroplasty in preference to a proximal gastric vagotomy. The appropriate operation to perform after perforation of an acute duodenal ulcer in a patient with any of the contraindications listed above is simple closure or omental patch closure. In the stable nonseptic patient, the choice is not as clear. Boey and associates noted cumulative recurrent ulcer rates of 37% and 31% at 3 years in separate studies in which omental patch closure was used for perforated acute duodenal ulcers. This may reflect the asymptomatic nature of chronic duodenal ulcers in some patients prior to perforation, the failure of the surgeon to recognize the extent of periduodenal scarring at operation, or differences in the length of postperforation follow-up in series reporting perforations of acute or chronic ulcers. Jordan has suggested that all stable patients with perforated duodenal ulcers should undergo a proximal gastric vagotomy in addition to omental patch closure. In his hands, the addition of proximal gastric vagotomy has an operative mortality rate of 0 to 1%, a recurrent ulcer rate of 3% to 5%, and no adverse postoperative sequelae. He has noted that "this operation gives protection from further ulcer disease to those who need it and will produce no harm to the unidentifiable patients that might not have benefited from definitive surgery." Boey and Wong suggested that omental patch closure is indicated for "acute ulcers associated with drug ingestion or acute stress" in addition to those that occur in patients who are considered to be poor risk, while proximal gastric vagotomy should be added in the remaining patients with perforations of acute ulcers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Surgical Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease

Elective surgery for peptic ulcer disease has diminished significantly over the past 15 years. However, emergency surgery has not shown a decline. Some series have even reported an increase in hospitalizations and operations for hemorrhage. The appropriate surgical procedure for peptic ulcer disease must be tailored to the specific needs of the individual patient. During emergency operations for hemorrhage from duodenal ulcer, we recommend suture ligature of the bleeding vessel and vagotomy-pyloroplasty for high-risk patients, or vagotomy-antrectomy for the lower-risk patient. Bleeding gastric ulcers should be resected, if possible. For massive hemorrhage from stress ulceration requiring surgery, near-total or total gastrectomy should be performed. Perforated duodenal ulcers are best managed by closure and a definitive ulcer operation, such as vagotomy-pyloroplasty. Perforated gastric ulcers are best excised but may be simply closed if conditions do not favor resection. In these situations, biopsy should be performed. We recommend truncal vagotomy-antrectomy for patients presenting with obstruction. Vagotomy (truncal or proximal gastric) with drainage is an acceptable alternative in this situation. For patients with intractable ulcer disease or for those who are noncompliant, proximal gastric vagotomy is the preferred operation. However, other operations may need to be considered, depending on the specific situation. Recurrent ulceration needs appropriate work-up to determine the possible cause. Although patients with ulcer recurrence initially may be placed on medical treatment, about 50% will require reoperation. The most effective procedure for peptic ulcer disease is truncal vagotomy-antrectomy, which has a recurrence rate of less than 1%. The procedure with the least morbidity and the fewest undesirable side effects is proximal gastric vagotomy. Ulcer recurrence after proximal gastric vagotomy or truncal vagotomy-pyloroplasty is in the range of 10% to 15%.

Surgical treatment of bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer diseases.

From 1977 to 1988, 556 patients underwent emergency surgery for complicated peptic ulcers. Among them, 409 patients were for treated perforations and 147 for hemorrhages. In the perforated ulcer category, the morbidity rate was 12.5% and mortality rate 6.8%. For bleeding ulcers, the morbidity rate was 27.2% and mortality rate 14.9%. Several risk factors, such as age, interval of time between perforation and surgery, blood loss, associated disease, and shock were found to have created a higher operative risk. A definitive surgery including vagotomy and drainage, vagotomy and antrectomy, partial gastrectomy and highly selective vagotomy could be safely performed with an acceptable mortality for properly selected cases. Follow-up results also indicated better scores in this group of patients. We concluded that a definitive ulcer operation is safe, acceptable and curative for low risk patients with perforated or bleeding ulcers.

Peptic Ulcer Disease in Children: Etiology, Clinical Findings, and Clinical Course

The records of all children with peptic ulcer disease at the Hospital for Sick Children were retrospectively evaluated, excluding neonates, throughout a 5-year period. Only cases with a definite ulcer crater identified either at endoscopy or at surgery were included. There were 36 patients, 20 boys and 16 girls. Duodenal ulcers were more common than gastric ulcers (2.8:1). Ages ranged from 3 months to 17 years, with a mean age of 10 years. Patients were reviewed with respect to etiology of peptic ulcer disease, age when first examined, initial symptoms, and clinical course. Patients were divided into two groups, those with primary (n = 19) and those with secondary (n = 17) peptic ulcer disease. All peptic ulcers in patients younger than 10 years of age were secondary in nature. Secondary ulcers occurred generally in association with a severe underlying illness (11/17), and many ulcers necessitated emergency surgery because of perforation and/or severe hemorrhage (8/17). None of these patients had chronic or recurrent symptoms. In contrast, in children with primary peptic ulcer disease, initial symptoms were more benign. Most patients had abdominal pain and only one required emergency surgery. Children with primary duodenal ulcer disease had a high incidence of recurrent symptoms (67%), however, with surgery for intractable disease necessitated in 40%. Single-contrast barium meals were found to be unreliable in establishing a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease, particularly cases of gastric ulcer disease.

Which Operation for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer?

Patients with perforated duodenal ulcers were randomly assigned to treatment by one of two teams depending on the day of their admission. Team 1 favoured treatment by definitive ulcer curing surgery (usually truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty) and 79% of patients were treated in this way. Team 2 favoured conservative surgery (oversewing) and only 36% of patients treated by this team had a definitive procedure (p < 0.001). The overall mortality rate for patients treated by the two teams was the same (18.3%). Bearing in mind the high recurrence rates which have been reported after simple oversewing we would recommend that definitive surgery is preferable for most cases of duodenal perforation.

Lithium fluxes across the gastric mucosa after truncal vagotomy and drainage--an objective assessment of mucosal injury.

Gastric mucosal permeability to lithium has been measured in 20 patients with an untreated duodenal ulcer, eight patients who were asymptomatic for more than one year after truncal vagotomy and drainage, 14 patients with an endoscopically proven recurrent ulcer, and 21 patients with an unsatisfactory result from truncal vagotomy and drainage for other reasons. Lithium fluxes were lowest in the asymptomatic postoperative patients (0.149 +/- 0.028 mmol Li+/15 min), but were not significantly different to the measured fluxes in patients with a duodenal ulcer before treatment (0.160 +/- 0.020 mmol Li+/15 min) or a recurrent ulcer after truncal vagotomy and drainage (0.169 +/- 0.022 mmol Li+/15 min) (SEM). By comparison the mean lithium flux in patients who were dissatisfied with the results of their previous surgery for reasons other than a recurrent ulcer (0.234 +/- 0.019 mmol Li+/15 min) was significantly higher than that observed in patients with a duodenal ulcer (p less than 0.05), patients with a recurrent ulcer (p less than 0.05) or patients who were asymptomatic after definitive ulcer surgery (p less than 0.02). Furthermore, when the lithium fluxes observed in 11 patients whose major postoperative complaint was bile vomiting (0.243 +/- 0.027 mmol Li+/15 min) were compared with results from the remaining 52 patients included in the study (0.173 +/- 0.012 mmol Li+/15 min) fluxes were significantly higher in the 'bile vomiters' (p less than 0.05).

Perforated peptic ulcer in south-eastern Nigeria 1973-1982.

In a prospective study aimed at evaluating a safe treatment for tropical African conditions 205 patients who presented with perforation of a peptic ulcer in South Eastern Nigeria during the ten year period January 1973 to December 1982 were treated by simple suture. The ulcers were classified at operation from appearance as acute in 155 patients (75.6%), and chronic in the remaining 50 patients (24.4%). Of this number 21 patients (10.2%) died post-operatively. All 21 patients had chronic pyloroduodenal ulcers which were complicated by haemorrhage in 10 patients (5.0%) and extensive scarring of the duodenum and pyloric stenosis in 9 patients (4.4%). In contrast, no patient with acute pyloroduodenal ulcer died and none was known to suffer from recurrent dyspepsia at 6 months to 1 year follow-up. These results show that simple suture is an adequate and safe treatment for perforated acute pyloroduodenal ulcer but this treatment is, however, followed by an unacceptably high mortality in patients with perforated chronic pyloroduodenal ulcers in whom were feasible, a definitive ulcer--curative surgery should be performed.