Introduction: Subdural hematoma (SDH) affects >100,000 patients/year in the US and leaves >50% of its victims dead or severely disabled. Coagulopathy is an independent predictor for death and disability after SDH. Optimal treatment for coagulopathy-associated SDH remains controversial. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may rapidly reverse coagulopathy in warfarin-associated SDH (wSDH) but may increase thromboembolic (TE) complications. We hypothesize that PCC use in wSDH may decrease time to surgery from rapid coagulopathy reversal and therefore decrease mortality, but may increase in-hospital TE complications Methods: From a single center prospective database we identified 82 consecutive acute wSDH patients from 2008–2012 with admission INR>1.4. All patients were treated per standardized protocol for rapid warfarin reversal with conventional therapy (FFP+IV vitamin K). Additional 3-factor PCC may be used at treating physician’s discretion. Patients with “do-not-resuscitate” orders within 24 hours of admission, multiple anticoagulant use, chronic SDH, SDH associated with multisystem trauma, and with GCS of 3 and fixed and dilated pupils on presentation were excluded. Primary endpoint was in-hospital and 6-months mortality. Secondary endpoints were time to surgery and incidence of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) and troponin elevation. Propensity scores adjustment was used to reduce confounding. PS for PCC use were modeled using age, gender, mean arterial pressure, admission INR, presence of fixed dilated pupils, GCS, presence of multiple SDH, SDH diameter, SDH location, and midline shift as covariates. Conditional logistic regression models matched on quartiles of propensity score were used to compare in-hospital and 6-month all-cause mortality between PCC-treated and conventional therapy groups. Results: PCC-treated (n=38) and conventional therapy groups (n=44) had similar mean age, gender, baseline hypercoagulable conditions, and median initial INR on presentation. PCC-treated group had lower median GCS on presentation compared with conventional therapy group (14 vs. 15, p<0.0001). PCC-treated group received fewer units of FFP transfusion compared with conventional therapy (median 4 vs. 6 units, p=0.003). Overall in -hospital (OR: 1.61 [0.19–13.62], p=0.66) and 6-month mortality (OR: 3.24 [0.85–12.41], p=0.09) were not different between PCC-treated and conventional therapy group after PS adjustment. PCC use was independently associated with reduced time to surgery (-1.92 [(-2.70)–(-1.20)] after PS adjustment. Univariate analysis showed PCC group had higher incidence of DVT/PE (16% vs. 0%, p=0.006) and troponin elevation (32% vs. 14%, p=0.04) compared to conventional therapy. However, after PS adjustment there were no between-group differences in the incidence of DVT/PE or troponin elevation. Conclusions: Warfarin reversal with PCC reduced time to surgery and decreased the number of FFP transfusion needed but did not reduce in-hospital or 6-month mortality in wSDH. PCC use was not independently associated with increased TE complications in wSDH. Future prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine the risk versus benefit of PCC use in wSDH, and to determine whether rapid correction of coagulopathy leads to better neurological outcome and decreased mortality in wSDH.