BackgroundEffect‐size underestimation impedes biomarker identification. Long follow‐up time in prospective studies attenuates effect‐size estimates for transient biomarkers, while disease category–specific biomarkers are affected by merging of categories. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) encompasses deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).Objectives(i) To re‐analyze untargeted proteomic data to identify biomarker candidates for future VTE that differ between DVT and PE and are attenuated by extended time between sampling and VTE. (ii) To perform targeted candidate validation.Patients/MethodsA VTE case‐control discovery study and a nested case‐control validation study were derived from the general population surveyed in 1994–95. Plasma was obtained at study enrollment, and VTE events were registered until 2007. Untargeted proteomic data were re‐analyzed for candidate discovery. Lipopolysaccharide‐binding protein (LBP) was validated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsElevated LBP was discovered as a candidate DVT biomarker in women with less than 3 years between blood sampling and DVT. In the validation study, the odds ratio (OR) for DVT was 2.03 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.53–2.74) per standard deviation (SD) increase in LBP for women with less than 3 years between blood sampling and DVT. Adjustment for age, body mass index, and C‐reactive protein attenuated the OR to 1.79 (95% CI: 1.25–2.62) per SD. In the validation study, we observed an OR for VTE of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.28–0.77) for men in the 25th to 50th percentiles when compared to the lowest quartile.ConclusionsWe discovered and validated increased LBP as a predictive biomarker for DVT in women. We found an increased VTE risk for men in the lowest quartile of LBP.