Deep Plane Technique Research Articles

Integrating SMAS plication and deep plane techniques in facial rejuvenation: A novel approach

IntroductionIn the realm of facial rejuvenation surgeries, deep plane facelift and SMAS plication techniques have been applied with notable efficacy over an extended period, yielding aesthetically pleasing outcomes.Both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages depending on individual circumstances.We endeavored to formulate an effective facelift method by integrating both approaches, aiming to harness the advantageous aspects of each method while addressing their respective drawbacks in a comprehensive manner. MethodsFollowing the preparation of the subcutaneous plane overlying the fixed SMAS, the mobile SMAS was elevated from the deep plane, and a SMAS flap was fashioned.The SMAS flap in the prezygomatic and premasseteric areas was inwardly folded, and a plication procedure was applied using loop sutures from its most medial to lateral aspects. Subsequently, it was secured to the preauricular area with U stitches. The results were statistically evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using WSRS scores. ResultsA total of 40 patients underwent operative procedures effectively performed by the senior author(F.C.). Preoperative WSRS scores were measured at 4.2 ± 0.52. Postoperative WSRS scores at 3 months were significantly lower at 1.25 ± 0.44 (p<0.05). The facelift procedure was effectively applied in all patients without the development of major complications. ConclusionsThis method combines deep plane facelift and surgical SMAS plication, utilizing the advantages of both techniques to directly address nasolabial folds and achieve gratifying outcomes in facial and neck rejuvenation.

CORE High-SMAS Extended Deep Plane Facelift Technique: How it Evolved.

Extended deep plane techniques have become the benchmark of facelift surgery. Yet these techniques assume release of the medial most of zygomatic retaining ligaments, which makes them rather complex and highly dependent on training and experience. In this article, we will review and describe the adapted extended high-superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) approach of the author and discuss the obstacles that can be encountered mastering this technique.

The Nuances and Techniques of Deep Plane Face and Neck Lifting to Maximize the Defined Neck and Jawline and Obtain a Sharp and Beautiful Neck Contour.

This article seeks to expand on our understanding of lifting by utilizing the benefits of deep plane release and repositioning. The deep plane is a more logical and natural approach to lifting of the face and neck, lifting along the natural anatomic glide planes. Deep plane face and neck lifting have demonstrated superior results in the authors' experience with less dependence on ancillary measures such as fat grafting or implantation for midface volumization. The deep plane technique allows for the face and neck to be treated and lifted as a single composite unit, providing a more natural and long-lasting result and less distortion of underlying structures (i.e., mimetic muscle function). Among facelift surgeons, there is still debate and discussion over treatment of various regions including submandibular gland prominence, jowling and deepened prejowl sulcus, anterior digastric prominence, and a low hyoid. In this article, given the opportunity to share personal experiences, we seek to provide additional insight on the merits of deep plane release in rhytidectomy and our novel approaches to avoiding surgical failures.

Advanced Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy: Advantages for Neck Treatment and Volumization of the Midface.

The aged neck is the most common motivator for patients seeking facial rejuvenation. Unlike the deflated midface, surgical treatment is still the gold standard for optimal outcomes. It is our view that the majority etiology of both the aged neck and deflated midface is gravity's effects on the superficial soft tissue envelope, leading to soft tissue redundancy. It is also our view that the deep-plane rhytidectomy is supported by anatomy, embryology, and clinical evidence as the best methodology to treat soft tissue redundancy without producing the aesthetic and longevity issues associated with superficial musculoaponeurotic system techniques. As one of the early pioneers in deep-plane rhytidectomy, the lead author will define contemporary advances in deep-plane technique such as dissection entry point, flap design, and flap fixation concepts that allow aggressive approach to treating both the aged neck and deflated midface.

The Detailed Anatomy of the Deep Plane of the Face and Neck with Current Nomenclature.

The fundamental goal of modern face and neck lifting is to enhance and restore a more youthful facial appearance by addressing soft tissue descent. There are variations in described facelift technique including superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flaps, composite flaps, deep plane, skin flaps, and subperiosteal facelifts, among others. The term "deep plane rhytidectomy" was originally described by Hamra. This term has since been linked with facelift surgery with recent advances including incision placement, treatments of SMAS-platysma complex, and mastoid crevasse among others. In the lead authors' experience, using deep plane techniques have demonstrated superior facial surgical rejuvenation results with less dependence on ancillary measures such as fat grafting or implantation for midface volumization. In order to successfully perform any face or neck lift, it is key to understand the relationship of the skin, the fat compartments, and the ligamentous attachments. This chapter details the anatomy of the deep plane of the face and neck and explains some nuances as it relates to surgical lifting. We also describe recent anatomical revelations of the mandibular ligament and its management in deep plane face lifting. In this chapter, given this opportunity to share personal experiences and preferences, the authors hope to describe relevant anatomy for the deep plane and provide some clarity on the merits of deep plane face and neck lift technique.

Advanced Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy: Advantages For Neck Treatment and Volumization of The Midface.

The aged neck is the most common motivator for patients seeking facial rejuvenation. Unlike the deflated midface, surgical treatment is still the gold standard for optimal outcomes. It is our view that the majority etiology of both the aged neck and deflated midface is gravity's effects on the su-perficial soft tissue envelope, leading to soft tissue redundancy. It is also our view that the deep-plane rhytidectomy is supported by anatomy, embryology, and clinical evidence as the best meth-odology to treat soft tissue redundancy without producing the aesthetic and longevity issues asso-ciated with SMAS techniques. As one of the early pioneers in deep-plane rhytidectomy, the lead author will define contemporary advances in deep-plane technique such as dissection entry point, flap design, and flap fixation concepts that allow aggressive approach to treating both the aged neck and deflated midface.

Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy: Pearls in Maximizing Outcomes while Minimizing Recovery.

The deep-plane rhytidectomy was first described in 1990 and has gained traction in the past decade as supported by anatomy, embryology, and clinical evidence. Consumer dissatisfaction in facial rejuvenation procedures often occurs because procedures are too conservative and are undone. From the consumer's perspective, an outcome is a combination of the esthetic result, predictability, and the length of the recovery process. The length of the recovery process is often the limiting issue affecting the consumer's willingness to proceed with the procedure. As one of the early pioneers in deep-plane rhytidectomy, the lead author will define contemporary advances in deep-plane techniques such as dissection entry point, flap design, and flap fixation concepts that allow an aggressive approach to treating both the superficial soft tissue envelope and deeper facial aging structures. These technique modifications and insights will provide the surgeon with an understanding of how to achieve significant, natural, long-lasting results with predictable short recovery periods-maximizing outcomes and minimizing postoperative processes.

The Mastoid Crevasse and 3-Dimensional Considerations in Deep Plane Neck Lifting.

Advances in face and neck lifting involve release of tethering points along the superficial musculoaponeurotic system-platysma complex to freely manipulate the deep natural glide plane in the face and neck. The aim of this article was to determine a combination of deep plane techniques for addressing the face and neck and to elucidate, for the first time, a measurable endpoint for the gonial angle. Analysis of deep plane tethering and decussation zones was also undertaken. Extended deep plane surgery performed in 79 patients (158 hemifaces; age, 30-75 years; 95% female), over a 3-month period, was reviewed. Patients were followed for 1 year. Measurements were performed systematically during deep plane face and neck lifting. Before intervention, the mean [standard deviation] gonial depth was 9.4 [3.6] mm on the left and 8.3 [2.7] mm on the right. The mean depth created below the gonial angle when measuring the traditional suspension to the anterior mastoid was 15.8 [3.3] mm on the left and 13.7 [2.5] mm on the right. The distance postoperatively when measuring the gonial depth after performing the crevasse technique was 23.2 [2.2] mm on the left and 22.5 [2.5] mm on the right. This represents a mean increase in the advancement of 7.4 mm on the left and 8.8 mm on the right (average, 8.1 mm) which was demonstrated to be statistically significant bilaterally (P < .0001). The deep plane techniques described here aid manipulation of the deep plane and deep neck space, while also providing measurable endpoints and more effective modes of fixation by utilizing the mastoid crevasse. The use of techniques that release tension and allow redrape produce the most natural and well-balanced results.

Quantifying Skin Removal During a Face-lift: Does the Approach Matter?

The purpose of this study was to measure the amount of skin removed around the ears during a face-lift procedure. The secondary metric assessed skin removal comparing different face-lift techniques of SMASectomy versus deep plane approach and lastly comparing with and without midline corset platysmaplasty (MCP). One hundred fifty consecutive face-lift patients were measured for skin removal at 3 cardinal locations in the postauricular, preauricular, and temple regions. Measurements were quantitated and compared statistically with different face-lift techniques. The average skin removal in the postauricular area was 4 cm, the preauricular area was 2.4 cm, and the temple 1.9 cm. There was no difference in skin removal comparing SMASectomy and deep plane face-lift. There was a small but significant difference when MCP was performed, with more skin removal with MCP. Quantifying the amount of skin removal during a face-lift procedure provides surgeons and patients important information. There was no difference when comparing the simpler SMASectomy technique with the more invasive deep plane technique.

Facelift Surgery: History, Anatomy, and Recent Innovations.

Facelift surgery has become a beautifully predictable, safe, and extremely effective operation. Our patients can expect natural and long-lasting results as a direct outcome of our improved understanding and applications of surgical facial anatomy. Rhytidectomy, once an operation of simple well-placed elliptical skin excisions, evolved to include longer skin flaps, skin and platysma flaps with various superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) manipulations, and various deep plane techniques involving the skin and SMAS as a single unit composite flap. Extended deep plane rhytidectomy and vertical vector neck and SMAS lifting have emerged in recent years as techniques that extend the traditional deep plane dissection into the neck in a subplatysmal plane to allow for release of the platysma from the cervical retaining ligaments. This, ultimately, allows for the creation of a dramatically more youthful appearing face, neck, and jawline.

Deep-Plane Approach to the Vertical Platysma Advancement: Technical Modifications and Nuances over 25 Years.

In this article, we will provide the reader with the anatomical and embryologic evidence supporting the use of the deep-plane approach in rhytidectomy and insight into the evolution of the technique into the vertical platysma advancement. The original description of the deep-plane technique only described a basic superficial muscular aponeurotic system dissection in the midface with the ability to use tension on the flap without aesthetic consequences. This plane of dissection provides additional advantages not previously described, including access to deeper anatomical structures such as the buccal fat pad, and allows in vivo assessment and treatment of jowling. We describe how extension of this dissection and selective release of facial ligaments allows us to optimize treatment outcomes and longevity, especially in cases of difficult anatomy or revisions. Further advancements include case-specific facial volume enhancement, created by complex flap design, and facial narrowing by preauricular contouring and parotid hypertrophy treatment. Insights into anatomical landmarks, technical nuances, and alternative approaches for facial variations are presented.

Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy.

Rhytidectomy techniques have evolved significantly since the procedure's introduction in the early 20th century. Significant advancements in rhytidectomy techniques occurred in the 1960s and 1970s with the description of the subfascial rhytidectomy, the identification of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), and development of the SMAS flap. The incorporation of fascial undermining and suspension techniques have significantly improved the longevity and natural appearance of the facelift operation. More aggressive techniques including subperiosteal, composite, and deep plane techniques have been developed in the pursuit of the perfect facelift procedure. On the basis of over 25 years of clinical and surgical experience, a biplane SMAS imbrication rhytidectomy provides a natural, unstretched, and refreshed appearance resulting in high patient satisfaction. This article will present a detailed description of the rationale, technique, and nuances of the biplanar SMAS imbrication rhytidectomy. While the management of the platysma may vary depending on individual patient characteristics, the extent of subcutaneous, sub-SMAS, and neck dissection employed using the biplanar SMAS imbrication rhytidectomy minimizes patient complications and allows a relatively rapid recovery.

Deep plane facelifting for facial rejuvenation.

The purpose of this article is to provide the facial plastic surgeon with anatomical and embryologic evidence to support the use of the deep plane technique for optimal treatment of facial aging. A detailed description of the procedure is provided to allow safe and consistent performance. Insights into anatomical landmarks, technical nuances, and alternative approaches for facial variations are presented. The following points will be further elucidated in the article. The platysma muscle/submuscular aponeurotic system/galea are the continuous superficial cervical fascia encompassing the majority of facial fat, and this superficial soft tissue envelope is poorly anchored to the face. The deep cervical fascia binds the structural aspects of the face and covers the facial nerve and buccal fat pad. Facial aging is mainly due to gravity's long-term effects on the superficial soft tissue envelope, with more subtle effects on the deeper structural compartments. The deep plane is the embryologic cleavage plane between these fascial layers, and is the logical place for facial dissection. The deep plane allows access to the buccal fat pad for treatment of jowling. Soft tissue mobilization is maximized in deep plane dissections and requires careful hairline planning. Flap advancement creates tension only at the fascia level allowing natural, tension-free skin closure, and long-lasting outcomes. The deep plane advancement flap is well vascularized and resistant to complications.

Rhytidectomy

To evaluate the current evidence-based medicine for rhytidectomy. Specific techniques and their scientific rationale are explored. The authors' practice modifications based on this evidence will be reviewed. The utilities of short scar facelift techniques are validated. Specific indications for the deep plane technique are also discussed. The reader will understand the rationale for choosing specific rhytidectomy techniques for young patients, older patients and specific anatomic findings.

Facial Rejuvenation Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 8788 Cases

Surgical rejuvenation of the aging face is common in aesthetic surgery, and many surgical techniques have been described for accomplishing it. The keys to consistent results are the surgeon's judgment and ability to individualize a treatment plan according to the patient's needs. To obtain natural-appearing results, the surgeon must consider the morphological characteristics of the aging face. The authors describe their approach for "round" facelift technique and strategies for avoiding complications. This retrospective study included 8788 consecutive patients who underwent facelift procedures in a single clinic between 1958 and 2010. All cases involved the round-lifting technique. Patients in this series ranged in age from 28 to 84 years. The percentage of male patients increased in later years (6.3% in 1970-1974 vs 18.6% in 1986-2010), and there was a trend toward increasing age after 1979 (17.7% of patients aged 60 years or older vs 8.3% before 1980). Submental liposuction was the most common facelift procedure performed (92.2% of patients, 1990-2010). Up to 97% of the cases treated after 1999 underwent repositioning of the malar fat pad. The overall complication rate was 4.5%, with the most frequent complications being hematoma (3%) and cutaneous slough or necrosis (1%). Repositioning the vector connecting the tragus with the Darwin tubercle provides more natural correction of aging tissues than do other techniques. The authors' intent was to keep the structures in their natural location, as they had been prior to aging. Superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, malar fat pad repositioning, and correct traction of facial tissues showed satisfactory results. This technique is less aggressive than undermining of the SMAS and deep-plane techniques. 4.

Anatomical Comparison of Platysmal Tightening Using Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Plication vs Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy Techniques

To quantify the degree of submental platysmal tightening that can be accomplished with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication vs deep-plane rhytidectomy techniques in a cadaveric anatomical study to help dictate the need for midline platysmal surgery when using different rhytidectomy techniques. The lateral distraction of the medial edge of the platysma muscle was measured during tightening of the SMAS-platysmal complex on 5 cadaver heads. The measurements were taken after the following 3 rhytidectomy techniques: SMAS-platysmal plication, deep-plane rhytidectomy, and extended deep-plane rhytidectomy continuing the flap below the angle of the mandible into the neck with release of the platysma and cervical retaining ligaments. The medial edge of the platysma muscle was distracted laterally 427% more with deep-plane rhytidectomy compared with SMAS-platysmal plication (P < .001). Extending the deep-plane rhytidectomy flap into the neck to release the cervical retaining ligaments resulted in 554% greater lateral distraction of the medial edge of the platysma muscle compared with SMAS-platysmal plication (P < .001). This represents 30% greater advancement compared with the traditional deep-plane technique (P = .05). Extending a traditional deep-plane rhytidectomy inferiorly to release the lateral platysma and cervical retaining ligaments to the sternocleidomastoid muscle achieves the greatest lateral motion of the midline platysma, theoretically obviating the need for midline platysmal plication except in cases of severe platysmal laxity and banding. Because of the limited platysmal motion during SMAS plication, midline platysmal plication should routinely be used as an adjunct procedure except in cases of no or minimal platysmal laxity.

The Subcutaneous Cervicofacial Flap Revisited

The cervicofacial flap has been the reconstruction of choice for midface soft tissue defects for over 30 years. Deep plane dissection has been advocated to decrease complication rates and improve results. However, the subcutaneous approach is still widely used. Over a 20-year period, we reviewed all patients who underwent subcutaneous cervicofacial flaps for cheek defects to analyze complications and results.Thirty-two patients (mean age, 71 years) underwent 32 subcutaneous cervicofacial flaps for cheek reconstruction after Mohs micrographic excision of skin cancer. The mean defect size was 7.2 x 5.8 cm. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Only 3 of 32 patients (9%) had minor flap tip or edge necrosis, all managed without further surgery. One patient (3%) had minor long-term ectropion with upward gaze and 31 of 32 patients were happy with their results.The subcutaneous rotation-advancement cervicofacial flap remains an excellent choice for cheek reconstruction with comparable tip necrosis rates and likely lower ectropion rates when compared with the deep plane technique.

Experience with Fibrin Glue in Rhytidectomy

The authors conducted a large, prospective, controlled trial of fibrin glue in rhytidectomy using a wide set of variables. Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing elective rhytidectomy were studied. One hundred patients received fibrin glue over a 1-year period and were followed prospectively. Another 100 patients from the previous year who had not received fibrin glue had their charts reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent bilateral face lifts using the deep plane technique. The following data were observed for the glue versus nonglue patients: expanding hematoma rate, 1 percent versus 3 percent (p > 0.05); seroma rate, 1 percent versus 7 percent (p > 0.05); and prolonged induration, edema, and ecchymosis, 0 percent versus 22 percent (p < 0.05). The pain score for glue versus nonglue patients was 100 percent minimal versus 95 percent minimal and 5 percent moderate (p > 0.05). The average score for patient satisfaction (scale, 1 to 10, with 10 being best) for glue versus nonglue patients was 9.5 versus 9.0 (p > 0.05). The use of fibrin glue was associated with some benefits for rhytidectomy. Fibrin glue eliminated the use of drains. The difference in expanding hematoma was clinically, but not statistically, significant. The seroma rate was decreased and neared statistical significance. There was an impressive immediate decrease in postoperative swelling. The fibrin glue was most advantageous in eliminating prolonged induration, edema, and ecchymosis. There were no statistical differences between groups for patient satisfaction or pain. The use of fibrin glue has been shown to reduce some of the morbidity and severe complications of face lifting.

Deep-Plane Technique

Deep-Plane Technique

The deep plane facelift.

The goal of any cosmetic facial plastic surgery procedure is to obtain a natural-appearing result that is not overdone or obviously operated upon. This is the case whether the background of the operating surgeon is in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, general plastic surgery, dermatology, or oculoplastic surgery. To satisfy this goal, the surgeon must apply those techniques that consistently achieve effective but understated results rather than experimenting with every new innovation or fad. More and more surgeons are moving away from some of the so-called advances of the last decade, including the use of lasers for skin resurfacing and the application of endoscopic approaches to the face, in the search for the best results possible. Sometimes this means utilizing older techniques that have proven the test of time, such as the coronal browlift and chemical peels, whereas other times this means embracing those newer techniques that clearly represent major advances in our specialty, such as the transconjunctival approach to lower lid blepharoplasty. The deep plane facelift is one such advance. In contrast to traditional, skin or short-SMAS flap techniques, the deep plane facelift allows the surgeon to consistently obtain a natural-appearing result that not only addresses the key areas of concern in the aging face but also proves to be longer lasting as well. The deep plane technique also results in fewer complications, an improved ability to address the melolabial region and jowls, and increased anatomic appeal for the operating surgeon.