Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Treatment Research Articles

Reproducibility and stability of voluntary deep inspiration breath hold and free breath in breast radiotherapy based on real-time 3-dimensional optical surface imaging system.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-fraction reproducibility and intra-fraction stability of breast radiotherapy using voluntary deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) based on an optical surface imaging system (OSIS). Seventeen patients (510 breath-hold sessions) treated using a field-in-field (FiF) technique and twenty patients (600 breath-free sessions) treated with a volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique were included in this retrospective study. All the patients were positioned with the guidance of CBCT and OSIS, and also monitored with OSIS throughout the whole treatment session. Eight setup variations in three directions were extracted from the treatment reports of OSIS for all sessions and were subsequently manually introduced to treatment plans, resulting in a total of 296 perturbed plans. All perturbed plans were recalculated, and the dose volume histograms (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. The OSIS and CBCT for both DIBH and FB treatments showed a good agreement of less than 0.30cm in each direction. The intra-fraction respiratory motion data during DIBH were -0.06 ± 0.07cm, 0.12 ± 0.15cm, and 0.12 ± 0.12cm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively; for FB, the respiratory motion data were -0.02 ± 0.12cm, 0.08 ± 0.18cm, and 0.14 ± 0.20cm, respectively. For the target, DIBH plans were more sensitive to setup errors; the mean deviations in D95 for CTV were 39.78Gy-40.17Gy for DIBH and 38.46Gy-40.52Gy for FB, respectively. For the OARs, the mean deviations of V10, V20, and Dmean to the heart; V5, V20, and Dmean to the ipsilateral lung; and Dmean to the breast were lower for the FB plan compared with the DIBH plan. Based on OSIS, our results indicate that both DIBH and FB can provide good reproducibility in the inter-fractions and stability in the intra-fractions. When the patient respiratory motion is large, the FB technology has greater possibility for the undercoverage of the target volume, while DIBH technology is more likely to result in increases in dose to OARs (the lung, heart, and contralateral breast).

Surface guided ring gantry radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold for breast cancer patients.

This study investigated the use of surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in combination with a tomotherapy treatment mode using discrete delivery angles for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatments of breast cancer (bc). We aimed to assess the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of this approach. We evaluated camera occlusion in the Radixact treatment system bore and the stability of DIBH signals during couch movement. The SGRT system's ability to maintain signal and surface image accuracy was analyzed at different depths within the bore. Dosimetric parameters were compared and measured for 20 left-sided bc patients receiving TomoDirect (TD) tangential radiotherapy in both DIBH and free breathing (FB). The SGRT system maintained surface coverage and precise DIBH-signal at depths up to 40cm beyond the treatment center. Camera occlusion occurred in the clavicular and neck regions due to the patient's morphology and gantry geometry. Nonetheless, the system accurately detected respiratory motion for all measurements. The DIBH plans significantly (p<0.001) reduced mean heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) radiation doses by up to 40%, with a 50% reduction in near-maximum heart and LAD doses, respectively. No significant dosimetric differences between DIBH and FB were observed in other investigated parameters and volumes. Camera occlusion and couch movement minimally impacted the real-time surface image accuracy needed for DIBH treatments of bc. DIBH reduced heart and LAD radiation doses significantly compared to FB, indicating the feasibility and dosimetric benefits of combining these modalities.

Investigation of Intra-fraction Stability and Inter-fraction Consistency of Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC)-Based Deep Inspiration Breath Holds in Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

Background Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has been established as a standard technique to reduce cardiac dose. The part of the heart exposed to radiation can be significantly decreased using the DIBH technique during tangential left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) irradiation. Aim The objective of this study was to investigate the intra-fraction breath-hold stability and inter-fraction consistency of patient breath-hold against the threshold as a function of air volumes in the setting of active breathing coordinator (ABC)-based DIBH (ABC-DIBH) treatment to LSBC. Methods A total of 34 patients treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the left breast using the ABC-DIBH device were included. The frequency of breath-holds perfraction and the entire course of treatment along with the total treatment time was evaluated for all patients.A prescription dose of either 200 cGy (conventional) or 267 cGy (hypofractionation) was administered during 649 fractions, resulting in a total of 4,601 breath-hold measurements being evaluated. The amplitude of deviation in terms of air volumes between the baseline threshold and the patient-specific measurement (during each breath-hold) per fraction was used to define the DIBH stability. Likewise, the consistency of the breathing amplitudes was used to define the compliance of patient breath-holds throughout the entire treatment period. Positional accuracy was evaluated using orthogonal (portal) images. Results The average number of breath-holds measured over the entire course of treatment for each patient was 144 inspirations (58-351). Similarly, the average number of breath-holds for each fraction during the course of treatment was 11 inspirations (7-21), which included setup imaging and treatment. The total number of breath-holds reduced significantly (p-value < 0.05) with hypofractionation (104 inspirations; range 58-170) as compared to conventional fractionation (145 inspirations; 58-351). The average breath-hold threshold in terms of air volume was 1.41 L(0.6-2.1 L) for all patients. The total treatment time reduced significantly after the third fraction (p-value < 0.05).The average deviation between the measured and baseline threshold breath-holds during the course of treatment was 0.5 L/sec (0.12-1.32 L/sec). The consistency of the breathing amplitudes were maintained within±0.05 Lduring the entire treatment for all patients. The average translational shifts measured during setup were 0.28 cm ± 0.3 cm, 0.38 cm ± 0.4 cm, and 0.21 cm ± 0.3 cm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. Conclusion The study has demonstrated the variations in intra-fraction breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold consistency in terms of air volumes for patients who were treated for LSBC. The frequency of breath-holds was observed to be higher with increased total treatment time for the first few fractions and reduced over the course of treatment.

Improving Patient Compliance for More Efficient Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Treatment through Innovation and Education.

Visual guidance has been widely proven to improve the reproducibility and stability of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) treatments. Here, we present a quality improvement project by implementing the use of visual guidance in a multi-campus institution to improve clinical efficiency, including the design of a novel mount for the visual aid and the creation of a patient education video to better prepare lung and GI patients for their DIBH treatments. Prior to institution-wide implementation, the clinical feasibility of utilizing visual guidance for DIBH treatments was determined by a pilot study with 10 lung/GI patients. A commercial visual guidance device was used, which consisted of a tablet-like device, attached to a mount affixed to the treatment couch. The device is positioned over the patient's head, displaying the real-time vertical motion of a block with infrared markers on the patient's abdomen. The original mount for the device locks onto the superior end of the treatment couch, which occupies space used for immobilization devices and limits the number of patients eligible for visual guidance when the isocenter is inferior, as for GI patients. A novel in-house mount was designed to overcome this limitation. Also, a patient education video was created to introduce the concept of DIBH and the visual aid device. Visual guidance is offered at the first treatment; its use is optional, and patients may start or stop using it at any time. If the device is not used, the patient relies on audio coaching from the radiation therapists (RTTs), which is the standard practice in our clinic. All 10 patients in the pilot who were offered the visual aid used it, found it helpful and continued to use it throughout their treatment, with no issues reported. The median number of fractions for all 10 patients was 5(3-15). The in-house mount was manufactured from 3D printed and machined components. The treatment couch was 3D scanned, and the mount was designed to clamp laterally on the couch top and align with the indexing indentations. The in-house mount is easy to use and is more versatile than the commercial mount, enabling use for patients with inferior isocenters. Prior to treatment, patients were encouraged to view the <3 min long patient education video that consisted of a combination of animation and real-actor content. Verbal instructions for use were also given by RTTs at the first treatment. Upon successful completion of the pilot study, the use of visual guidance was implemented institution-wide across 5 campuses for all lung and GI DIBH patients, being utilized on an average of 14 patients/week. A quality improvement project was developed and successfully implemented to introduce the use of visual guidance for lung and GI DIBH patients at a large institution, improving the efficiency of DIBH treatment for both the patients and RTTs.

Automated review of patient position in DIBH breast hybrid IMRT with EPID images.

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) is a respiratory-gating technique adopted in radiation therapy to lower cardiac irradiation. When performing DIBH treatments, it is important to have a monitoring system to ensure the patient's breath hold level is stable and reproducible at each fraction. In this retrospective study, we developed a system capable of monitoring DIBH breast treatments by utilizing cine EPID images taken during treatment. Setup error and intrafraction motion were measured for all fractions of 20 left-sided breast patients. All patients were treated with a hybrid static-IMRT technique, with EPID images from the static fields analyzed. Ten patients had open static fields and the other ten patients had static fields partially blocked with the multileaf collimator (MLC). Three image-processing algorithms were evaluated on their ability to accurately measure the chest wall position (CWP) in EPID images. CWP measurements were recorded along a 61-pixel region of interest centered along the midline of the image. The median and standard deviation of the CWP were recorded for each image. The algorithm showing the highest agreement with manual measurements was then used to calculate intrafraction motion and setup error. To measure intrafraction motion, the median CWP of the first EPID frame was compared with that of the subsequent EPID images of the treatment. The maximum difference was recorded as the intrafraction motion. The setup error was calculated as the difference in median CWP between the MV DRR and the first EPID image of the lateral tangential field. The results showed that the most accurate image-processing algorithm can identify the chest wall within 1.2mm on both EPID and MV DRR images, and measures intrafraction motion and setup errors within 1.4mm.

A method for beam's eye view breath-hold monitoring during breast volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a technique that is widely utilised to spare the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy. In this study, a method was developed to validate directly the intrafraction accuracy of DIBH during breast volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) via internal chest wall (CW) monitoring. In-house software was developed to automatically extract and compare the treatment position of the CW in cine-mode electronic portal image device (EPID) images with the planned CW position in digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) for breast VMAT treatments. Feasibility of this method was established by evaluating the percentage of total dose delivered to the target volume when the CW was sufficiently visible for monitoring. Geometric accuracy of the approach was quantified by applying known displacements to an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. The software was used to evaluate (offline) the geometric treatment accuracy for ten patients treated using real-time position management (RPM)-guided DIBH. The CW could be monitored within the tangential sub-arcs which delivered a median 89% (range 73% to 97%) of the dose to target volume. The phantom measurements showed a geometric accuracy within 1mm, with visual inspection showing good agreement between the software-derived and user-determined CW positions. For the RPM-guided DIBH treatments, the CW was found to be within±5mm of the planned position in 97% of EPID frames in which the CW was visible. An intrafraction monitoring method with sub-millimetre accuracy was successfully developed to validate target positioning during breast VMAT DIBH.

Comparison of normal tissue doses in deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing methods for radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer using 4D-XCAT digital phantom.

To evaluate normal lung and heart tissue doses for treatment of left-sided breast cancer in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) as a function of breast size and diaphragm displacement using 4D-XCAT digital phantom in a simulation study. 4D-XCAT digital phantom was used to create 36 left-sided breast cancer digital phantom datasets with different breast height (BH) of 40, 50, and 60 mm, breast length (BL) of 16, 17, and 18 mm, and diaphragm excursion of 20, 25, 30, and 35 mm. For each dataset, DIBH and FB treatment plans were prepared using planning computerized radiotherapy-three dimensional (PCRT-3D) treatment planning system (TPS) with superposition computational algorithm. Dose differences in DIBH and FB plans were assessed in terms of mean lung dose (MLD), the lung volume receiving ≤20 Gy (V20), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung, mean heart dose (MHD), and the heart volume receiving ≤30 (V30). DIBH reduced mean dose and V20 and NTCP of the lung in all cases, by up to 4.37 Gy, 7.62%, and 18.95%. Mean dose and V30 of the heart were also significantly reduced by 5.02 Gy and 8.23%. The use of DIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy offers excellent possibilities for sparing critical normal tissue without compromising radiation dose to the target.

Surface guided 3DCRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold for left sided breast cancer radiotherapy: implementation and first clinical experience in Iran.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall accuracy of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) workflow through a comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance procedures and assess the potential benefits of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy as a cardiac and lung dose reduction approach for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. Accuracy and reproducibility of the optical surface scanner used for DIBH treatment were evaluated using different phantoms. Patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of DIBH treatment were evaluated. Twenty patients were studied for treatment plan quality in target dose coverage and healthy organ sparing for the two different treatment techniques. Reproducibility tests for the surface scanner showed good stability within 1 mm in all directions. The maximum position variation between applied shifts on the couch and the scanner measured offsets is 1 mm in all directions. The clinical study of 200 fractions showed good agreement between the surface scanner and portal imaging with the isocenter position deviation of less than 3 mm in each lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction. The standard deviation of the DIBH level showed a value of < 2 mm during all evaluated DIBHs. Compared to the free breathing (FB) technique, DIBH showed significant reduction of 48% for heart mean dose, 43% for heart V25, and 20% for ipsilateral lung V20. Surface-guided radiotherapy can be regarded as an accurate tool for patient positioning and monitoring in breast radiotherapy. DIBH treatment are considered to be effective techniques in heart and ipsilateral lung dose reductions for left breast radiotherapy.

Intrafractional accuracy and efficiency of a surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath hold during ablative gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Beam gating with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) usually depends on some external surrogate to infer internal target movement, and the exact internal movement is unknown. In this study, we tracked internal targets and characterized residual motion during DIBH treatment, guided by a surface imaging system, for gastrointestinal cancer. We also report statistics on treatment time. We included 14 gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with surface imaging-guided DIBH volumetrically modulated arc therapy, each with at least one radiopaque marker implanted near or within the target. They were treated in 25, 15, or 10 fractions. Thirteen patients received treatment for pancreatic cancer, and one underwent separate treatments for two liver metastases. The surface imaging system monitored a three-dimensional surface with±3mm translation and±3° rotation threshold. During delivery, a kilovolt image was automatically taken every 20° or 40° gantry rotation, and the internal marker was identified from the image. The displacement and residual motion of the markers were calculated. To analyze the treatment efficiency, the treatment time of each fraction was obtained from the imaging and treatment timestamps in the record and verify system. Although the external surface was monitored and limited to±3mm and±3°, significant residual internal target movement was observed in some patients. The range of residual motion was 3-21mm. The average displacement for this cohort was 0-3mm. In 19% of the analyzed images, the magnitude of the instantaneous displacement was>5mm. The mean treatment time was 17min with a standard deviation of 4min. Precaution is needed when applying surface image guidance for gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Using it as a solo DIBH technique is discouraged when the correlation between internal anatomy and patient surface is limited. Real-time radiographic verification is critical for safe treatments.

Reproducibility of Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold treatments on Halcyon™ performed using the first clinical version of AlignRT InBore™: Results of CYBORE study

Background and purposeTo investigate the reproducibility of deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) breast cancer treatments on Halcyon™ performed using the first clinical version of AlignRT InBore™ (Vision RT Ltd., London, UK), a Halcyon’s SGRT dedicated solution. Materials and methodsThe ease and feasibility of DIBH treatments was retrospectively investigated for the initial 22 left breast cancer patients treated on Halcyon™ using AlignRT InBore™. Setup time, Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and analysis time as well as overall treatment time were recorded. Online and offline review of CBCT images was undertaken to verify the compliance of breast, heart, spine, sternum and diaphragmatic domes positions. ResultsMean duration of patient setup, CBCT analysis and overall treatment time were 4 min, 1.1 min and 14 min respectively. Online review of 520 CBCT acquisitions by therapists showed minimal positioning shifts with AlignRT InBore™ guidance with mean value of vertical, longitudinal, and lateral shifts of 1.7 mm, −1.7 mm, and −0.2 mm respectively. Meanwhile, offline review of 115 CBCTs by the radiation oncologist, showed reproducible breath hold (BH) with average deviation of breast, heart, spine, sternum and diaphragmatic domes respectively within 2.4 mm, 2.9 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.2 mm and 4.5 mm in magnitude. ConclusionAlignRT InBore™ allows for accurate and reproducible DIBH on Halcyon™ with breast and heart organs’ positions within 3 mm in magnitude of expected position and fully compliant with planning margins (5 mm anisotropic CTV-PTV margins).

Dosimetric advantages of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique in Halcyon Linac for left breast cancer treatment.

To evaluate the dosimetric advantages of incorporating the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique into left breast cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment under Halcyon Linac and to investigate the correlation between mean heart dose (MHD) and distance from the heart to target volumes in left breast cancer VMAT treatment. Fifteen Post-lumpectomy, left-sided breast patients treated between January 2017 and October 2020 were selected. Two plans were generated for each patient using Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) with the prescription of 50.4 Gy to planning target volume (PTV) breast and 58.8 Gy to PTV boost in 28 fractions. For each patient, DIBH and free breathing (FB) VMAT treatment plans under Halcyon Linac were generated. Dosimetric parameters, monitor unit and beam-on time of both DIBH and FB groups were compared. Three-dimensional distances from heart surface to each target volume were measured on computed tomography images using the TPS contouring tool and their correlation with MHD was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Comparable target coverage was shown in both groups. Mean dose to heart, left anterior descending artery, and left ventricle in Halcyon-DIBH-VMAT group were significantly reduced by 0.49 Gy, 1.19 Gy, and 0.57 Gy, respectively, compared to Halcyon-FB-VMAT (p < 0.001). A significant lung dose reduction was also achieved in Halcyon-DIBH-VMAT group. There was also a strong negative correlation between MHD and distance from heart surface to PTV boost in both FB and DIBH group (r = -0.741, p < 0.001), but not observed for distance from heart surface to PTV breast. Incorporating DIBH into left breast cancer VMAT treatment under Halcyon Linac demonstrated significant cardiac and lung dose reduction. It was also demonstrated that MHD had a strong negative correlation with distance from heart surface to PTV boost but relatively independent of distance from heart surface to PTV breast. Recognizing the distance from the heart surface to PTV boost as the main factor in affecting MHD could potentially facilitate clinical treatment planning workflow and decision.

Patient setup accuracy in DIBH radiotherapy of breast cancer with lymph node inclusion using surface tracking and image guidance.

Studying setup accuracy in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node inclusion in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) after patient setup with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Breast cancer patients (N = 51) were treated (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with axillary lymph nodes within the planning target volume (PTV). Patient setup was initiated with tattoos and lasers, and further adjusted with SGRT. The DIBH guidance was based on SGRT. Orthogonal and/or tangential imaging was analyzed for residual position errors of bony landmarks, the breath-hold level (BHL), the skin outline, and the heart; and setup margins were calculated for the PTV. The calculated PTV margins were 4.3 to 6.3 and 2.8 to 4.6 mm before and after orthogonal imaging, respectively. The residual errors of the heart were 3.6 ± 2.2 mm and 2.5 ± 2.4 mm before and 3.0 ± 2.5 and 2.9 ± 2.3 mm after orthogonal imaging in the combined anterior-posterior/lateral and the cranio-caudal directions, respectively, in tangential images. The humeral head did not benefit from daily IGRT, but SGRT guided it to the correct location. We presented a slightly complicated but highly accurate workflow for DIBH treatments. The residual position errors after both SGRT and IGRT were excellent compared to previous literature. With well-planned SGRT, IGRT brings only slight improvements to systematic accuracy. However, with the calculated PTV margins and the number of outliers, imaging cannot be omitted despite SGRT, unless the PTV margins are re-evaluated.

Intrafraction Accuracy and Efficiency of a Surface Imaging System for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Ablative Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

Beam gating with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) has been widely used for motion management in radiotherapy. It commonly relies on some external surrogate for internal target motion, while the exact internal motion is unknown. In this study, we tracked internal targets and characterized the residual motion during DIBH treatment for pancreatic cancer patients guided by a surface imaging system. We also report the treatment time statistics.Eight consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with surface-guided DIBH volumetrically-modulated arc therapy in 2019-2020 were selected for this study, each with some radiopaque markers (fiducial markers or surgical clips) implanted near or inside the target. Five patients were treated in 25 fractions, two were treated in 15 fractions, and one was treated in 10 fractions. The surface imaging system monitored a three-dimensional surface with gating thresholds of 3 mm translation and 3° rotation. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20˚ or 40˚ gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was obtained from imaging and treatment timestamps recorded at the treatment console.Even though the external surface was limited to 3 mm / 3°, significant residual internal target motion was observed for some patients. The residual motion ranged 3-21 mm. The average target displacement relative to the initial position was 0-3 mm for the cohort. The magnitude of instantaneous displacement was > 5 mm in 13% of the images analyzed. The average treatment time was 16 min with standard deviation 3 min.Internal target motion may differ significantly from external surrogate motion in DIBH treatment, even with surface image guidance. Radiographic verification of target position at the beginning and during each fraction is essential for accurate delivery of radiotherapy.

Automatic treatment planning of VMAT for left-sided breast cancer with lymph nodes

Background The standard in Denmark for treating breast cancer patients receiving loco-regional irradiation is tangential 3D Conformal RadioTherapy (3DCRT), treated in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Treating with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) may reduce the treatment time, which is particularly important for DIBH treatments. The VMAT should be performed without increased dose to the heart, lung, and contralateral breast. This study compares VMAT and 3DCRT for left-sided breast cancer patients with intramammary lymph node involvement. Material and methods Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients were included. VMAT and tangential plans were created for all patients, with a prescription dose of 50 Gy. The tangential plans used 6 MV and for larger breast combined with 18 MV. The VMAT plans utilised two 6 MV fields in a butterfly configuration. Dose planning was done in Pinnacle3 16.0 using the Auto-Planning module for the VMAT plans. Comparison of the plans was based on: mean doses, metrics provided by DBCG guidelines, dose-volume histograms and required number of breath-holds for treatment delivery in DIBH. Results For most OAR, the doses were similar for VMAT and 3DCRT. The target coverage was comparable, with VMAT having a statistically significant improved dose homogeneity of the target volumes. Less than half the number of breath-hold was required for VMAT compared to 3DCRT. Mean gamma pass rates (3 mm and 3%) from ArcCHECK of the VMAT plans was 98.4% (range 96.6–99.8%). Conclusion Automatic VMAT planning of left-sided breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement can produce dose distributions comparable to those of tangential 3DCRT, while reducing the number of breath-holds in DIBH by more than a factor of two. The reduction in breath-holds is beneficial for patient comfort and reduces the risk of intra-fraction patient motion.

Split-VMAT technique to control the deep inspiration breath hold time for breast cancer radiotherapy

BackgroundTo improve split-VMAT technique by optimizing treatment delivery time for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients, when automatic beam-interruption devices are not available.MethodsTen consecutive patients were treated with an eight partial arcs (8paVMAT) plan, standard of care in our center. A four partial arcs (4paVMAT) plan was also created and actual LINAC outputs were measured, to evaluate whether there was a dosimetric difference between both techniques and potential impact on the delivered dose. Subsequently, ten other patients were consecutively treated with a 4paVMAT plan to compare the actual treatment delivery time between both techniques. The prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions on the PTV breast (breast or thoracic wall), lymph nodes (LN) and intramammary lymph node chain (IMN). Treatment delivery time, PTVs coverage, conformity index (CI), organs at risk (OAR) dose, monitor units (MU), and gamma index were compared.ResultsBoth split-VMAT techniques resulted in similar dose coverage for the PTV Breast and LN, and similar CI. For PTV IMN we observed a 5% increased coverage for the volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy with 4paVMAT, with an identical volume receiving ≥ 32 Gy. There was no difference for the OAR sparing, with the exception of the contralateral organs: there was a 0.6 Gy decrease for contralateral breast mean (p ≤ 0.01) and 1% decrease for the volume of right lung receiving ≥ 5 Gy (p = 0.024). Overall, these results indicate a modest clinical benefit of using 4paVMAT in comparison to 8paVMAT. An increase in the number of MU per arc was observed for the 4paVMAT technique, as expected, while the total number of MU remained comparable for both techniques. All the plans were measured with the Delta4 phantom and passed the gamma index criteria with no significant differences. Finally, the main difference was seen for the treatment delivery time: there was a significant decrease from 8.9 to 5.4 min for the 4paVMAT plans (p < .05).ConclusionsThis study is mainly of interest for centers who are implementing the DIBH technique without automatic beam-holding devices and who therefore may require to manually switch the beam on and off during breast DIBH treatment. Split-VMAT technique with 4 partial arcs significantly reduces the treatment delivery time compared to 8 partial arcs, without compromising the target coverage and the OAR sparing. The technique decreases the number of breath holds per fraction, resulting in a shorter treatment session.

Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment.

PurposeDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment.Methods and MaterialsTwenty consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with DIBH (eight) or RG (twelve) volumetric modulated arc therapy during 2017–2019 were included in this study, with radiopaque markers implanted near or in the targets. Seventeen patients received 25 fractions, while the other three received 15 fractions. Only patients who could not tolerate DIBH received RG treatment. While both techniques relied on respiratory signals from external markers, internal target motions were monitored with kV X‐ray imaging during treatment. A 3‐mm external gating window was used for DIBH treatment; RG treatment was centered on end‐expiration with a duty cycle of 40%, corresponding to an external gating window of 2–3 mm. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20◦ or 40◦ gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was calculated from the motion management waveform files recorded at the treatment console.ResultsWithin one fraction, the displacement was 0–5 mm for DIBH and 0–6 mm for RG. The average magnitude of displacement for each patient during the entire course of treatment ranged 0–3 mm for both techniques. No statistically significant difference in displacement or residual motion was observed between the two techniques. The average treatment time was 15 min for DIBH and 17 min for RG, with no statistical significance.ConclusionsThe accuracy and efficiency were comparable between RG and DIBH treatment for pancreas irradiation. RG is a feasible alternative strategy to DIBH.

Is 5 mm breath-hold window (BHW) sufficient to treat carcinoma left breast patients post-conservative surgery: a comparative study using forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

AbstractPurpose:The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of changes in breathing pattern inside the breath-hold window (BHW) during deep inspiration breath hold treatment for carcinoma left breast patients post-conservative surgery.Methods:Ten patients of carcinoma left breast post-conservative surgery were prospectively selected. Three sets of CT plain images were acquired, one with 5 mm deep inspiration BHW (DIBHR) and the other one with 1 mm BHW matching the lower threshold (DIBHL) and the third one with 1 mm BHW matching the upper threshold (DIBHH) as DIBHR. For all patients, forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated in the 5 mm BHW CT series and the same plan being copy and pasted in other series. Target volume doses and critical structure doses were tabulated.Results:Planning target volume coverage was adequate and no significant differences were found in any CT series. Significant differences noted in average left lung V5%, V10% and V18% doses between DIBHR versus DIBHH (p values = 0·0461, 0·0283 and 0·0213, respectively) and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p values = 0·0434, 0·0484 and 0·0334, respectively) for FIMRT plans and V18% doses in DIBHR versus DIBHH (p = 0·0067) in VMAT. No differences in heart and apex of heart doses were found. Left anterior descending artery (LAD) mean doses were significant in DIBHL versus DIBHR, DIBHR versus DIBHH and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p = 0·0012, 0·0444 and 0·0048, respectively) series for FIMRT plans and DIBHR versus DIBHH and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p = 0·0341, 0·0001) for VMAT plans.Finding:The changes in the breathing pattern inside DIBH window level cause some variation in LAD doses and no other significant differences in any parameters noted, so care should be taken while treating patients with preexisting cardiac conditions.

Stability and reproducibility of 6013 deep inspiration breath-holds in left-sided breast cancer

PurposePatients with left-sided breast cancer frequently receive deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy to reduce the risk of cardiac side effects. The aim of the present study was to analyze intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold reproducibility in clinical practice.Material and methodsOverall, we analyzed 103 patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using a surface-guided DIBH technique. During each treatment session the vertical motion of the patient was continuously measured by a surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system and automated gating control (beam on/off) was performed using an audio-visual patient feedback system. Dose delivery was automatically triggered when the tracking point was within a predefined gating window. Intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction reproducibility across all fractions of the entire treatment course were analyzed per patient.ResultsIn the present series, 6013 breath-holds during beam-on time were analyzed. The mean amplitude of the gating window from the baseline breathing curve (maximum expiration during free breathing) was 15.8 mm (95%-confidence interval: [8.5–30.6] mm) and had a width of 3.5 mm (95%-CI: [2–4.3] mm). As a measure of intra-breath-hold stability, the median standard deviation of the breath-hold level during DIBH was 0.3 mm (95%-CI: [0.1–0.9] mm). Similarly, the median absolute intra-breath-hold linear amplitude deviation was 0.4 mm (95%-CI: [0.01–2.1] mm). Reproducibility testing showed good inter-fractional reliability, as the maximum difference in the breathing amplitudes in all patients and all fractions were 1.3 mm on average (95%-CI: [0.5–2.6] mm).ConclusionThe clinical integration of an optical surface scanner enables a stable and reliable DIBH treatment delivery during SGRT for left-sided breast cancer in clinical routine.

Impact of acuros XB algorithm in deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) respiratory techniques used for the treatment of left breast cancer.

To investigate the impact of Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in the deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique used for treatment of left sided breast cancer. AXB may estimate better lung toxicities and treatment outcome in DIBH. Treatment plans were computed using the field-in-field technique for a 6 MV beam in two respiratory phases - free breathing (FB) and DIBH. The AXB-calculations were performed under identical beam setup and the same numbers of monitor units as used for AAA-calculation. Mean Hounsfield units (HU), mass density (g/cc) and relative electron density were -782.1 ± 24.8 and -883.5 ± 24.9; 0.196 ± 0.025 and 0.083 ± 0.032; 0.218 ± 0.025 and 0.117 ± 0.025 for the lung in the FB and DIBH respiratory phase, respectively. For a similar target coverage (p > 0.05) in the DIBH respiratory phase between the AXB and AAA algorithm, there was a slight increase in organ at risk (OAR) dose for AXB in comparison to AAA, except for mean dose to the ipsilateral lung. AAA predicts higher mean dose to the ipsilateral lung and lesser V20Gy for the ipsilateral and common lung in comparison to AXB. The differences in mean dose to the ipsilateral lung were 0.87 ± 2.66 % (p > 0.05) in FB, and 1.01 ± 1.07% (p < 0.05) in DIBH, in V20Gy the differences were 1.76 ± 0.83% and 1.71 ± 0.82% in FB (p < 0.05), 3.34 ± 1.15 % and 3.24 ± 1.17 % in DIBH (p < 0.05), for the ipsilateral and common lung, respectively. For a similar target volume coverage, there were important differences between the AXB and AAA algorithm for low-density inhomogeneity medium present in the DIBH respiratory phase for left sided breast cancer patients. DIBH treatment in conjunction with AXB may result in better estimation of lung toxicities and treatment outcome.

Radiotherapy without tattoos: Could this work?

IntroductionAn evaluation to compare the traditional tattoo based set up procedure with a surface guided method to assess the possibility of eliminating permanent tattoos in breast cancer patents who are undergoing radiotherapy to the breast/chest wall. MethodsForty-three patients that were having radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall were included in this evaluation. The patients were divided into two groups and further divided into 2 sub-groups. The first group received standard dark ink tattoos and were positioned by aligning these tattoos with lasers. The second group had no tattoo's and were positioned using the Surface-Guided technology (SGRT). Within each group the patients were split into 2 sub-group; right and left sided treatment areas. The right side were treated using a Free-Breathing (FB) technique and the left sided were treated using a Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH) technique. ResultsFor the patients having right sided breast radiotherapy, the mean shift using the standard tattoos and laser set up was 0.52 cm, compared with using the SGRT method where the mean shift was 0.47 cm. (p-value 0.04)For patients having left sided breast radiotherapy with DIBH the mean shift using the standard tattoo's and laser set up was 0.76 cm, compared with a mean shift of 0.45 cm using SGRT alone (p-value < 0.001). ConclusionThe elimination of tattoos together with SGRT offers a comparable set-up for right sided breast treatments against the traditional tattoo method. A significant set-up improvement was observed for the left sided breast DIBH treatments. Implications for practiceTo set up patients having breast Radiotherapy, with no tattoo's.