Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Research Articles

Validating the porcine model for microsurgical perforator training: Can surgeons trained on pig perforator dissection successfully perform human DIEP flap procedures? A pilot study

Autologous breast reconstruction, especially using the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, is increasingly seen as a reliable, safe, and long-term alternative to implant-based reconstruction. Despite the recognized advantages of the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, successful realization demands excellent anatomical knowledge, a thorough understanding of autologous breast reconstruction concepts and advanced microsurgical skills. Given that the porcine model is widely employed in microsurgical training, our study aims to assess this model using validated outcomes, with the objective of evaluating the enhancement in a surgeon's learning curve following training with this model. Forty DIEP flaps were harvested on 20 swines by a single surgeon in "Pius Branzeu Center" (Timisoara, RO) and "Drazan Institute" (University of veterinary of Brno, CZ) laboratories for microsurgical training in 6months (January 2015-June 2015). Then we analyzed data from 40 DIEP flaps harvested by the same surgeon on first 20 consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Perforator dissection time, surgeon-determined dissection difficulty score (DDS) and venous congestion rate were collected for each flap in porcine model and in patients, then compared and analyzed. The mean of DDS score analysis in first and second swines group dissection resulted as statistically significant (P-value 0.0001), while it was not statistically significant between those analyzed in the second group of swines dissected and patients (P-value 0.8037). Reduction in perforator dissection time between the two swines' groups and in venous congestion rates from the first swines groups to the second to the human group resulted statistically significant too (P-value respectively 0.0001 and 0.0079). The porcine model has been used for a long time together with other animal models for microsurgical training. Our study confirms and objective by validated scores that it is a valid and reliable model, comparable to the human one and which mimics the dissection of human perforating vessels.

Gender-affirming DIEP Flap Breast Augmentation.

Implant-based techniques have been the mainstay of gender-affirming breast augmentation (GABA). Here we describe a novel autologous technique for GABA. We provide a single-patient case report of gender-affirming deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast augmentation. World Professional Association for Transgender Health guidelines were followed according to Standards of Care, version 8. Prepectoral tissue expanders were placed at the time of the patient's facial feminization surgery. DIEP flaps were then used for bilateral breast augmentation. Planned revisions were made about 5 months later. Breast augmentation was performed successfully with DIEP flaps, and the patient was satisfied with her outcome. No complications occurred. Anatomic differences to cisgender women were noted, including relatively thick musculature of the abdominal wall and chest as well as tight anterior abdominal fascial closure. Advantages compared with implant-based GABA were also noted, including feminization of the abdomen and avoidance of potential implant related complications. We report a novel approach to GABA. Our approach borrows well-established techniques with demonstrated efficacy and high satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction and even cosmetic purposes. However, sex- and hormone-influenced anatomic differences required some modifications compared with postmastectomy DIEP flap reconstruction.

Current status of autologous breast reconstruction in Argentina.

Although the most common procedure for breast reconstruction in Argentina is tissue expansion and implant devices, autologous tissue is frequently utilized. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction and, whenever possible, it is the first option. However, there are clinical or other circumstances, when a local or vicinity flaps for autologous reconstruction is preferred, even if exists a surgical and hospital facility for doing microsurgical procedures. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our experience with the use of local and vicinity flaps for volume and surface replacement in different requirements-autologous breast reconstructions post oncologic resections, volume replacement in weight loss patients and implant-explantation cases. We have utilized the modification of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (LD) described by Hammond with excellent results and high patient satisfaction. Thoraco-dorsal artery perforator flap is indicated on skin sparing mastectomies (SSMs), immediate reconstruction of the nipple areolar complex and simultaneous coverage of an implant or tissue expander, in irradiated or to be irradiated patients. Lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap has gained popularity because the unique position of the perforator at the lower lateral corner of the breast. It allows harvesting immediate vicinity tissue and easy rotation to the breast mound. We have used a modification towards the lateral thoracic wall of the anterior intercostal artery perforator flap for volume reconstruction after implant explantation.in patients who required volume preservation. Medial intercostal artery perforator flap is advantageous whenever the sub-mammary tissue can be used deepithelialized for volume reconstruction with a medial base. The same submammary area harvested as a medially based flap can be irrigated by the LICAP as a reverse LICAP flap that might be designed toward any direction from the piercing point of its perforator. The rest of the donor areas described for breast autologous reconstruction are rarely reported. When surgical facilities and adequate surgical teams are available, the lower abdominal wall is the main donor area, and DIEP, the most common technique utilized.

Hug Flap and Hamdi Hammock: Two Innovative Techniques for Enhancing Aesthetic Outcomes in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Breast Reconstruction.

Achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction remains a challenge, often necessitating additional procedures for refinement. This study presents two innovative techniques (the hug flap and Hamdi hammock) aimed at enhancing breast projection and inframammary fold (IMF) definition in DIEP flap reconstruction. The hug flap technique uses de-epithelialized caudal mastectomy skin to augment breast projection, whereas the Hamdi hammock uses a percutaneous purse-string suture to define the IMF. A retrospective review of 782 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2007 and 2023 was conducted. The hug flap group required significantly less additional fat grafting compared to other techniques (11% versus 27% and 22%). No total flap losses occurred in the hug flap group, and fat necrosis rates were low. The Hamdi hammock was used in 405 patients with a mean of two lipofilling sessions. Complications were minor and no stitches required removal. The hug flap and Hamdi hammock techniques offer effective and safe methods for enhancing breast projection and IMF definition in DIEP flap reconstruction. These techniques may reduce the need for additional procedures and improve aesthetic outcomes.

Flaps of the abdominal wall

Objective: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and transverse-vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM, VRAM) flaps are derived from the anterior abdominal wall and can be free or pedicled. This study aimed to analyze the differences in postoperative complication rates among various types of abdominal flaps and to assess the impact of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) on surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, analyzing abdominal flap operations performed between 2016 and 2023. Data on demographics, defect location, mesh use, and postoperative chemo-radiotherapy were collected. Quantitative variables were evaluated as means, minimum-maximum values, and categorical variables were assessed as percentages. Results: A total of 37 patients underwent 38 operations. Of these, nine patients had pedicled TRAM flaps, 16 had free-TRAM flaps, 6 had free DIEP flaps, and 6 had VRAM flaps. The defect locations were predominantly for breast reconstruction (81.08%), followed by head and neck (8.1%), extremity (8.1%), and thoracic wall (2.7%). The overall donor site complication rate was 5.4%, and the flap site complication rate was 13.51%. The lowest donor site complications were observed in the free-TRAM and VRAM groups (0%), while the highest were in the DIEP group (16.66%). The lowest flap site complication rate was 0% in the free-TRAM group, and the highest was 33.33% in the VRAM group. Donor site complication rates were similar between the mesh-used (5.88%) and non-mesh-used (5%) groups. All donor site complications occurred in patients who received postoperative CT and RT. Conclusion: Abdominal flaps were primarily utilized for breast reconstruction. The free-TRAM group exhibited the lowest donor and flap site complication rates, while the DIEP group had the highest donor site complication rates. Mesh use did not affect donor site complication rates. Postoperative administration of CT and RT was associated with increased donor site complications.

Strategically shifting paradigms: the new era of DIEP flaps with minimally invasive mastectomy: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Asian patients often present with a smaller body mass index with relatively insufficient tissue. To restore appropriate symmetry, a larger flap inset ratio must be transferred. Supercharging of the second vein or inclusion of bilateral pedicle is commonly required. Current paradigm shifts in mastectomy has also resulted in more minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) espousing smaller lateral incisions, leading to a significant change in available recipient vessels. This study aimed to demonstrate our experience in changing strategies of DIEP flaps following the evolution of mastectomy techniques.MethodsBetween October 2008 and March 2022, retrospective data was gathered for 278 patients who underwent breast reconstruction surgery utilizing DIEP flaps by a single plastic surgeon. These patients were divided into two distinct groups based on their operation dates, with November 2018 marking a pivotal moment when the first MIS, including endoscopic-assisted and robot-assisted mastectomy, was introduced.ResultsA total of 278 patients were included. Bipedicle vessel utilization for flap supercharge saw a significant increase (15.9% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), while the use of the superior inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) decreased (5.1% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.01). Preceding MIS, SIEV was the primary choice for flap supercharge (96.0%, p < 0.001), whereas post-introduction, the contralateral DIEP pedicle gained prominence (75.9%, p < 0.001). There was also an increased utilization of thoracodorsal artery and lateral thoracic artery following MIS.ConclusionThese findings underscore the profound impact of MIS on the strategic choices made in DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction.Trial registrationThis study is retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06321549).

A New Era in Perforator Flap Surgery for Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Robotic versus Standard Harvest of Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps.

Traditional deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap harvest splits the anterior sheath, weakening the abdominal wall and predisposing patients to bulge or hernia. Abdominal wall morbidity may be decreased using minimally invasive techniques. We refined a transabdominal approach to the robotic harvest of bilateral DIEP flaps. A retrospective medical record study involving all patients who underwent bilateral or bipedicled robotic DIEP (rDIEP) or standard DIEP (sDIEP) flap harvest between July 2021 and September 2022. Outcomes included abdominal wall morbidity, total operative time, length of stay (LOS), and complications. Forty-seven patients were included (48 sDIEP flaps, 46 rDIEP flaps) with no significant difference in patient characteristics. Fascial incision length in the rDIEP group was shorter (4.1 vs. 11.7 cm, p < 0.001). Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall was used in 13/24 sDIEP and none in rDIEP patients (p < 0.001). Operative time was longer in the rDIEP cohort (739 vs. 630 minutes, p = 0.013), although subanalysis showed no difference in the second half of the cohort. The average robotic dissection time was 135 minutes, which decreased significantly with the surgeon's experience. There were no intraoperative complications from using the robot. LOS was shorter with rDIEP but not statistically significant (3.9 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.157). This study represents the most extensive cohort analysis of bilateral rDIEP flap harvest, offering a comprehensive comparison to traditional sDIEP. The initial results underscore the viability of robotic techniques for flap harvesting, highlighting potential advantages including reduced fascial incision length and decreased abdominal disruption. Furthermore, using robotics may obviate the necessity for fascial reinforcement with mesh.

The largest perforator of DIEP flap has a higher rate of continuity with the superficial inferior epigastric artery

In deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the network with the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) is key to achieving stable subcutaneous blood flow to the flap. This study investigated how the diameter and location of the DIEA perforator affect continuity with the SIEA. A retrospective analysis of 94 specimens from 47 patients who underwent DIEA perforator flap breast reconstruction was performed. Relationships between the diameter and location of the DIEA perforator and its continuity with the SIEA were examined on preoperative multi-slice computed tomography. The largest DIEA perforator on each specimen showed continuity with the SIEA in 94%, significantly more than the second (80%; p=0.027) or third largest perforator (76%; p=0.005). Medial perforators from 3cm above to 3cm below the umbilicus showed more continuity with the SIEA than lateral perforators (p=0.008). Selection of the largest perforator of DIEP flap is advantageous in terms of continuity with the SIEA. Also, near the umbilicus, medial perforators communicate with the SIEA more than lateral perforators.

Prophylactic Venous Supercharging in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction. A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group (DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group (DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed, and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting. In total, 154 patients were included in the study, divided into case group (74 patients) and control group (80 patients). The median age at the time of surgery was 49.09 years (range: 29-68 years), slightly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.52 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2), in particular 25.47 kg/m2 (range: 23.44-28.63 kg/m2) in group 1 and 25.58 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2) in group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. The average operative times were 272.16 minutes (range: 221-328 minutes) in group 1 and 272.34 minutes (range: 221-327 minutes) in group 2, with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia time (44.4 minutes in group 1 [range: 38-56 minutes] and 49.12 minutes in group 2 [range: 41-67 minutes]). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short-term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the two groups. Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, to avoid flap venous congestion and decrease the rates of re-exploration.

The first 150 consecutive DIEP free flaps: Lessons learnt and a guide to efficiency for the junior plastic surgeon

IntroductionThe deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold-standard for breast reconstruction but is technically demanding, resource intensive and time-consuming, making it a daunting task for the junior surgeon. AimTo report the lessons learnt from the experience of a single surgeon performing their first 150 DIEP reconstructions as a guide for junior surgeons. MethodsData regarding patient demographics and surgical outcomes from April 2021 to October 2022 were collected retrospectively from medical records. Surgical outcomes were analysed using Microsoft Excel. ResultsOver 17 months, 150 flaps were completed in 97 patients by the senior author (BS). Operative duration was negatively correlated with case number for unilateral DIEPs (r = -0.73, p < 0.05) and for bilateral DIEPs (r = -0.67, p = 0.14). Raise time and ischaemic time were also negatively correlated with case number (r = -0.82, p < 0.05 and r = -0.79, p < 0.05, respectively). There were 10 complications and no flap losses. DiscussionThe data demonstrate an expected improvement in surgical efficiency with increased experience. We describe the key factors contributing to efficiency in our series, such as preoperative CT angiography, surgical markings prior to the day of surgery, a two-team approach with three diathermy sets, flap raise using monopolar diathermy, preference towards choosing a single dominant perforator and early commitment to perforator choice. This case series acts as a guide for the junior plastic surgeon in achieving safe, aesthetic and efficient results when completing free DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

Effectiveness of the proximal medial branch in DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction using Hartrampf zone IV

BackgroundWhen performing breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, including Hartrampf zone IV, the bipedicled DIEP flap has been argued to be necessary to ensure stable perfusion. However, a proximal medial branch (PMB), which is the most proximal perforator of the deep inferior epigastric artery, may make it possible to obtain adequate perfusion in a unilateral DIEP flap. This study aimed to clarify the detailed anatomical characteristics of PMB and its potential clinical application in breast reconstruction. MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted on breast reconstruction using the DIEP flap between May 2020 and July 2023. Data on PMB anatomy were collected from preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography, and contralateral perfusion of the flap was estimated using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography. ResultsThe PMB was present in approximately 85% of cases, arising near the lateral border of the rectus abdominis, branching caudomedially in over half of the cases, and perforating 2.3cm laterally and 8.8cm caudally on average from the umbilicus. The average perfusion area of both zones II and IV significantly expanded to 96.5% and 74.2%, respectively, when the PMB was included in the DIEP flap, and 9 of 22 cases showed contrast extending to the entire zone IV. ConclusionsThe use of the DIEP flap with PMB is a good option for substantial-volume breast reconstruction. When utilizing the PMB, it is important to consider its specific anatomy, location of the main perforator, and pedicle length.

Perfusion area versus volume of the DIEP flap: A multivariable analysis of perforator and flap characteristics for estimation of perfusion area and volume

BackgroundThe extent of perfusion of a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a primary concern for surgeons. This study aimed to determine whether the flap area or volume can be estimated using perforator and flap characteristics. MethodsIntraoperative flap perfusion was assessed using indocyanine green angiography in patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between November 2018 and February 2023. The area perfused by a single dominant perforator was delineated on the surface of the flap and measured using the ImageJ software. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate the ‘perfusion ratio,’ defined as the perfused area divided by the total flap area. Potential predictor variables included flap size (cm2), flap thickness (mm), perforator diameter (mm), perforator rows (medial/lateral), vertical location of perforator (at or above/below the umbilicus), and perforator eccentricity (vertical distance from upper flap margin to perforator, cm). ResultsIn total, 101 patients were included in this analysis. The mean ‘perfusion ratio’ was 67.8% ± 11.5%, predicted by perforator diameter (p = 0.022) and vertical location below umbilicus (p < 0.001) with positive correlations and negatively correlated with flap thickness (p = 0.003) in the multivariable analysis. Both perfusion area and weight were predicted by perforator diameter, vertical location of perforator, flap size, and flap thickness (p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (adjusted R2) for prediction of perfusion weight was higher than that for the perfusion area (75.5% vs. 69.4%). ConclusionsFlap volume, rather than area, is determined by a perforator of a given diameter and location.

Lower Abdominal vs. Lateral Thigh Perforator Flaps in Microsurgical Sarcoma Reconstruction: The Aesthetics of Donor Site Matters.

Introduction: Sarcoma resection often leaves patients with big defects only amenable through microsurgical reconstruction. In such cases, it is hard for the surgeon to uphold low donor-site morbidity with an aesthetic result. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and the patient's perception regarding the donor site in a cohort of patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction with lateral thigh and lower abdominal perforator flaps. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who underwent sarcoma reconstruction with flaps harvested from the lower abdominal region (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap) or lateral thigh region (anterolateral thigh perforator flap and its variations) was performed. Only patients with defects greater than 100 cm2 were included. Patient demographics and operative variables were recorded, together with complications. Patient satisfaction and quality of life with the donor site were registered using the SCAR-Q questionnaire, which was administered at least six months post-operatively. Results: Eighteen anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flaps and twenty-two deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap procedures were performed. The two groups were homogeneous for major post-operative complications (p > 0.999). Patient satisfaction with the donor site measured using the SCAR-Q questionnaire showed significantly higher scores in the DIEP/SCIP group when compared with the thigh group (p < 0.001), indicating a superiority of the lower abdominal area as an aesthetic donor site. Conclusions: The DIEP and SCIP flaps are a versatile option for reconstructing large soft-tissue defects following sarcoma resection. Therefore, flaps harvested from the lower abdomen yield a higher patient satisfaction with the donor site, which is a feature worth considering when planning a reconstructive procedure.

One-Stage Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage of Infected Tissue Expanders

Background Tissue expander-based breast reconstruction is associated with high rates of infectious complications, often leading to tissue expander explants and delays in receipt of definitive breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy. In this study, we describe a single-stage technique where deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are used to salvage actively infected tissue expanders among patients originally planning for free flap reconstruction. Methods In this technique, patients with tissue expander infections without systemic illness are maintained on oral antibiotics until the day of their DIEP flap surgery, at which time tissue expander explant is performed in conjunction with aggressive attempt at total capsulectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients are maintained on 1–2 weeks of oral antibiotics tailored to culture data. Patients undergoing this immediate salvage protocol were retrospectively reviewed, and complications and length of stay were assessed. Results In a retrospective series, a total of six consecutive patients with culture-proven tissue expander infections underwent tissue expander removal and DIEP flap reconstruction in a single stage and were maintained on 7–14 days of oral antibiotics postoperatively. Within this cohort, no surgical site infections, microvascular complications, partial flap losses, reoperations, or returns to the operating room were noted within a 90-day period. Conclusions Among a select cohort of patients, actively infected tissue expanders may be salvaged with free flap breast reconstruction in a single surgery with a low incidence of postoperative complications. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the influence of this treatment strategy on costs, number of surgeries, and dissatisfaction after staged breast reconstruction complicated by tissue expander infections.

Projected augmented reality in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Projecting perforators on the skin using dynamic infrared thermography

BackgroundDynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) is a quick and non-invasive technique for perforator mapping in free flaps that provides real-time information. After a cold challenge, areas best supplied with blood become visible hotspots on color-coded maps, indicating perforators. This study presents a proof of principle for a new and innovative feature of DIRT, where projected augmented reality is used to directly display thermal images on the patient’s abdomen prior to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. MethodsA self-aligning projection device prototype (Anatomy Projector) equipped with an integrated thermal camera was used to obtain thermal information and project the color-coded map directly on the patient’s abdomen before DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Projected DIRT hotspots were verified using a hand-held Doppler, and compared to the vascularity on computed tomography angiography (CTA), and intraoperative perforator measurements following a Cartesian grid. ResultsA total of 514 DIRT hotspots were projected in 50 patients, among them 97.3% could be verified using Doppler. The positive predictive value for CTA was 74.5%. Intraoperative measurements yielded 132 perforators in 71 flaps, among them 75 perforators (56.8%) correlated with projected DIRT hotspots, and half of them (54.7%) appeared within the first 5 emerging hotspots. ConclusionThis study showed that real-time display of thermal data in DIEP flap breast reconstruction is feasible via projected augmented reality. Projection facilitates convenient marking of hotspots, and a high resemblance to Doppler and CTA data was observed. Further research should assess the added value of projecting thermal images intraoperatively and in other fields of plastic surgery.

Analysis of Vascular Anatomy in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Abstract Objectives The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. One of the existing challenges of the procedure is maintaining a pedicle of suitable length and diameter for flap survival. In this study, we analyzed the vascular anatomy of bi-pedicle DIEP flap cases in terms of the vessel diameter, the rate of secondary venae comitantes, and pedicle length to determine the efficacy of microvascular anastomosis and venous drainage. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using free bi-pedicle DIEP flaps between 2012 and 2019. The patient characteristics, diameters of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and accompanying veins (DIEVs), DIEA pedicle length, vessel re-anastomosis rate, flap failure rate, and fat necrosis were recorded. Results Comparison of the right side and left side diameters and pedicle lengths obtained showed no significant differences (p &gt; 0.05). A total of 148 sides (68.52%) of flaps had double venous drainage, whereas 68 sides (31.48%) of flaps had one. Vein congestion occurred in 5 cases, and all involved with just one DIEV anastomosis. No arterial occlusions were observed. Conclusions This is an analysis of extensive clinical data in terms of DIEA, DIEV, and pedicle length. The low vein congestion rate observed reveals adequate venous drainage was achieved in the DIEV system for DIEP reconstruction. Adequate deep inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length and vessel size, as well as greater than 60% of flaps with secondary DIEV, may allow comfortable microsurgery with reduced complications.

Oncologic Staging Computed Tomography with IV Contrast Has Similar Efficacy to Dedicated Computed Tomography Angiography for Preoperative DIEP Flap Planning

Background: Due to variations in perforator vasculature, deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap preoperative imaging can minimize operative time required to locate the most suitable perforators. Dedicated computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been the gold standard; however, many patients have already undergone a staging computed tomography (CT) per oncologic workup. The benefits from CTA may also be realized with a staging CT or CT with IV contrast. Methods: Ten patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction with staging CT and CTA within 3 years of one another were included in this study. Reviewers evaluated axial views of both imaging modalities separately to identify each visible perforator in reference to the pubic symphysis from the xiphoid to the pubic symphysis. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine agreement in location of perforators between the two imaging studies. Statistical analysis was performed using an ICC and Wilcoxon signed rank-tests. Results: The identified perforators within the patient cohort had an excellent correlation between their location on CT and CTA based upon ICC. The mean number of perforators identified in the CT group was 15.3 (SD 4.9) and in the CTA group was 18.8 (SD 6.4), which was not statistically different (P = 0.247). Conclusions: CT has similar efficacy in identifying number of perforators and perforator location to dedicated CTA for preoperative planning in DIEP flaps. This has the potential for decreased patient contrast and ionizing radiation exposure as well as improved patient and healthcare resource utilization.

Social Determinants of Health and Patient-reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction, Using Insurance as a Proxy.

Insurance type can serve as a surrogate marker for social determinants of health and can influence many aspects of the breast reconstruction experience. We aimed to examine the impact of insurance coverage on patients reported outcomes with the BREAST-Q (patient reported outcome measure for breast reconstruction patients, in patients receiving) in patients receiving deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. We retrospectively examined patients who received DIEP flaps at our institution from 2010 to 2019. Patients were divided into categories by insurance: commercial, Medicaid, or Medicare. Demographic factors, surgical factors, and complication data were recorded. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, and generalized estimating equations were performed to identify associations between insurance status and five domains of the BREAST-Q Reconstructive module. A total of 1,285 patients were included, of which 1,011 (78.7%) had commercial, 89 (6.9%) had Medicaid, and 185 (14.4%) had Medicare insurances. Total flap loss rates were significantly higher in the Medicare and Medicaid patients as compared to commercial patients; however, commercial patients had a higher rate of wound dehiscence as compared to Medicare patients. With all other factors controlled for, patients with Medicare had lower Physical Well-being of the Chest (PWBC) than patients with commercial insurance (β = - 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): -5.0, -1.2, p = 0.002). There were no significant associations between insurance classification and other domains of the BREAST-Q. Patients with government-issued insurance had lower success rates of autologous breast reconstruction. Further, patients with Medicare had lower PWBC than patients with commercial insurance regardless of other factors, while other BREAST-Q metrics did not differ. Further investigation as to the causes of such variation is warranted in larger, more diverse cohorts.

Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: 20 Pearls for Practice.

Autologous breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is an excellent option for many patients proceeding with mastectomy for surgical management of their breast cancer. As microsurgical techniques and results improve and ensure consistent flap survival, optimizing aesthetic outcomes may become a primary focus. This article outlines 20 tips that can improve aesthetic results in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, based on our senior author's 8-year career in microsurgical breast reconstruction, with an emphasis on enhanced cosmesis. We highlight tips on preoperative planning, intraoperative, and revision stages of the reconstruction and provide a schematic for integrating the tips into a reader's microsurgical breast reconstruction practice.

Robotic Repair: An Alternative Technique for Rectus Diastasis and Abdominal Bulge Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite advances in perforator dissection, abdominal morbidity still occurs. Traditional rectus diastasis (RD), abdominal bulge, and hernia repair with open techniques are associated with higher complication rates and recurrence. We present a novel case series of robotic repair of symptomatic RD and/or abdominal bulge with concurrent hernia following DIEP flap surgery. A single-center, retrospective review was conducted on 10 patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and subsequent robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge and hernia. Pre-operative demographics and post-operative clinical outcomes were reviewed. RD up to 5 cm, abdominal bulge, and any concurrent ventral/umbilical hernias were repaired robotically via retrorectus plication and macroporus mesh reinforcement. The average age and BMI were 49 years (range 41-63) and 31 kg/m2 (range 26-44), respectively. The average number of perforators harvested per flap was 2.5 (range 1-4). Average RD and hernia size were 3.95 cm (range 2-5) and 5.8 cm2 (1-15), respectively. Eight patients stayed one night in the hospital, two went home the same day as the robotic repair. No patients converted to open technique and none experienced complications within 30 days. For the patients who experience donor site morbidity following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, minimally invasive robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge with hernia can be performed with mesh reinforcement. This technique is effective with low complication rates and should be considered over open repair.