Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty In Eyes Research Articles

Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Advanced Stage of Keratoconus

To compare visual acuity, refractive error, and complications after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in the management of advanced stage of keratoconus. Retrospective, comparative, interventional study. This study enrolled 411 consecutive keratoconus eyes with preoperative mean keratometry ≥60 D that received either PK (218 eyes) or DALK (193 eyes). The outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity, refraction, complications, and further surgical interventions. The mean follow-up duration was 77.9±46.5 and 72.9±47.8 months in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P=0.28). Compared to baseline values, postoperative visual acuity and refraction significantly improved in both groups. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.18±0.13 and 0.26±0.19 logMAR in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P<0.001). Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -2.89±2.89 D after PK and -4.58±3.62 D after DALK (P<0.001). Final keratometric astigmatism was comparable between the two groups (P=0.82). Suture-related complications were observed in 48.6% of the PK eyes and 72.0% of the DALK eyes (P<0.001). The incidence of graft rejection was 33.5% after PK and 19.7% after DALK (P=0.002). At the last visit, 98.2% of PK grafts and 94.8% of DALK grafts remained clear (P=0.06). Both techniques of corneal transplantation led to a significant improvement in the visual and refractive variables in eyes with advanced keratoconus. PK resulted in a better visual acuity and refraction with less suture-related complications compared to DALK. However, PK was associated with higher rate of graft rejection. The two techniques were comparable in terms of graft survival.

Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Children and Adolescents With Keratoconus

To compare the outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for pediatric keratoconus. Retrospective comparative interventional case series. This study included consecutive pediatric keratoconus cases (≤18 years of age) who received PK (n=45) or DALK (n=54) in 2 different time periods. Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and complications were compared between the study groups. The mean follow-up was 83.3±46.1 and 63.3±45.6 months in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P=.10). Postoperatively, BSCVA was 0.20±0.19 logMAR in the PK group and 0.26±0.19 logMAR in the DALK group (P=.11), with a BSCVA of ≥20/40 in 91.1% and 83.3% of eyes, respectively (P=.25). Two groups were comparable regarding postoperative refractive outcomes. Graft epitheliopathy and suture-associated complications were more commonly encountered after DALK, which was attributable to the effect of low-quality grafts on the clinical outcomes of DALK. Ten PK eyes (22.2%) and 9 DALK eyes (16.7%) experienced at least 1 episode of graft rejection within 5 years of corneal transplantation (P=.49). Rejection was reversible in 93.1% and 100% of episodes in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P=.63). At the postoperative year 5, 95.6% of grafts in the PK group and 98.2% in the DALK group remained clear (P=.45). No significant difference was observed in the outcomes between PK and DALK in pediatric keratoconus. Low-quality donor tissues in DALK increased the incidence of graft epithelial problems and suture-related complications as compared to PK.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty After Previous Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty to Improve the Visual Outcomes.

To describe a series of patients who underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) after previous anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) to improve their visual outcomes. This is a retrospective case series of 9 DALK eyes (9 patients) with a history of previous ALK and an unsatisfactory visual outcome. Surgery was performed in all cases at least 3 years after ALK. Cannula big bubble, air viscobubble, and manual dissection techniques were performed. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, residual recipient bed thickness, and endothelial cell count were evaluated. Follow-up was at least 24 months for all eyes. Two subtotal anterior lamellar keratoplasties (through 1 type 1 big bubble and 1 air viscobubble) and 7 manual dissection DALKs were achieved. A small rupture of the residual recipient bed occurred during 1 case, and it was managed without penetrating keratoplasty conversion. Mean best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.64 to 0.09 logMAR. Postoperative residual recipient central bed thickness was less than 80 μm in all cases. No postoperative complications were recorded at the last follow-up (24-36 months postoperatively). Different DALK techniques can be successfully used to improve visual acuity in previous ALK eyes with an unsatisfactory visual outcome.

Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus.

Perception of reduced incidence of graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has attracted many surgeons towards this technique in keratoconus. This review aims to compare the visual, refractive and graft outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and DALK for keratoconus. Electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), ClinicalTrial.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were performed. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparative studies to assess primary and secondary outcomes after PK and DALK in eyes with keratoconus. Primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR at ≥6 months. Secondary outcomes included number of patients with BCVA≥0 LogMAR, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) LogMAR, spherical equivalent (SE), refractive and keratometric astigmatism, endothelial cell density (ECD) cell/mm2, graft rejection and graft survival. Eighteen studies (including 2 RCTs) compared DALK (965 eyes) and PK (2402 eyes) for keratoconus. There was strong evidence through RCTs suggesting better LogMAR BCVA at ≥6 months and better LogMAR UCVA with PK; reduced refractive astigmatism and rejection with DALK and no difference in SE and keratometric astigmatism. Moreover, there was weak evidence to suggest better BCVA≥0 LogMAR after PK and no difference in ECD between the two techniques. Despite the popularity of DALK amongst corneal surgeons for keratoconus, there is a paucity of high quality RCTs. The existing limited evidence confirms reduced rejection and refractive astigmatism with DALK but better visual outcomes with PK. Internationally agreed data sets and follow-up protocol are warranted.

Management of Keratoconus: Recent Trends

Keratoconus is a bilateral, progressive disease characterised by corneal thinning, ectasia, variable degree of irregular astigmatism and resultant mild to severe reduction in visual acuity. Multiple advances in corneal imaging and topographic mapping have led to a better understanding of the disease and its progression. Traditionally, use of spectacles and rigid contact lenses has been the primary mode of treatment in early KC while keratoplasty has been the treatment of choice in advanced cases. However, development of an array of therapeutic options over the last decade has revolutionized the approach to this disease. The preferred treatment for progressive KC has shown a paradigm shift from contact lens fitting for as long as tolerated, followed by Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) or Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), to Ultraviolet-A (UV-A) induced collagen cross-linking (CXL) to stabilize corneal ectasia in the long term. Recently, use of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments, Phakic IOLs, application of excimer laser and use of combination techniques have all made significant contribution in providing options for effective management of different stages of this disease. Bowman layer (BL) transplantation is a new technique that has recently been introduced as an alternative to PK/ DALK in eyes with advanced KC, unsuitable for either UV-CXL or ICRS. By means of this article, we aim to provide a summary of these recent trends in therapeutic options for the optimal management of keratoconus.

Higher Order Aberrations After Keratoplasty for Keratoconus

To compare higher order aberrations (HOAs) caused by the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (ALTK) in patients undergoing corneal transplantation for keratoconus (KC). This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study included one eye of the following subjects: 40 patients with KC, 23 KC patients after PK, 17 KC patients after DALK, 18 KC patients after ALTK, and 38 healthy controls. All underwent imaging with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (at least 6 months after complete suture removal in grafted subjects) to assess the HOAs from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces within the central 4-mm and 6-mm zones. The conversion of the corneal elevation profile into corneal wavefront data was performed using Zernike polynomials. Total and third- and fourth-order HOAs were considered. The root mean square of the Zernike vector magnitude, expressed in micrometers, was used. Differences among groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Duncan multiple range tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. In both 4-mm and 6-mm central zones, the total HOAs from the anterior corneal surfaces were significantly lower in DALK than in ALTK and PK groups (p < 0.05). The total HOAs from the posterior corneal surface were comparable amongst postoperative groups (p > 0.05). The aberration components that were significantly greater included coma in the KC and ALTK eyes, trefoil and coma in the DALK eyes, and trefoil in the PK eyes. The corneal anterior surface optical quality appeared significantly better after DALK than after ALTK and PK.

Characteristic Higher-Order Aberrations of the Anterior and Posterior Corneal Surfaces in 3 Corneal Transplantation Techniques

To investigate the corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in eyes that underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Retrospective, case-control study. study population: Twenty-four eyes underwent PK, 28 eyes underwent DALK, and 19 eyes underwent DSAEK; 29 normal eyes served as controls. observation procedures: The anterior and posterior corneal heights and pachymetric data were obtained with a Scheimpflug-based corneal topographer. Corneal HOAs for 4-mm pupils were calculated from the height data and were expanded with normalized Zernike polynomials. The HOAs resulting from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were compared among the procedures. main outcome measures: Anterior and posterior corneal HOAs (root mean square). Control eyes had significantly lower total HOAs and Zernike vector terms of the anterior and posterior surfaces than the other groups, except for spherical aberration. The mean anterior corneal surface total HOAs in the PK, DALK, DSAEK, and control groups were 1.38 ± 0.67 μm, 1.19 ± 0.57 μm, 0.61 ± 0.33 μm, and 0.21 ± 0.07 μm, respectively. The anterior corneal HOAs in the DSAEK group were significantly less than those in the PK group (P < .001) and DALK group (P < .001). The mean posterior corneal surface total HOAs were, respectively, 0.20 ± 0.09 μm, 0.24 ± 0.11 μm, 0.27 ± 0.15 μm, and 0.07 ± 0.02 μm. There were no significant differences in the posterior corneal HOAs among the treatment groups. Because the refractive indices between the anterior and the posterior surfaces differed greatly, eyes that undergo DSAEK have lower anterior corneal HOAs compared with PK or DALK eyes. However, the anterior and posterior corneal HOAs in DSAEK eyes still were greater than those in control eyes.

Graft Biomechanical Properties after Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Purpose: To compare biomechanical properties of transplanted corneas after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with those after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using Anwar’s big-bubble technique.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study consisted of 45 PK eyes (group 1) and 23 DALK eyes (group 2) with the underlying pathology of keratoconus. The Ocular Response Analyzer was used to measure Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc), as well as graft biomechanical properties, namely corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The results were compared between the study groups using independent t-test.Results: Mean patient age was 29.8 ± 6.1 years in group 1 and 27.2 ± 6.5 years in group 2 (P = 0.11) and they were followed up for 31.4 ± 19.0 months and 29.2 ± 17.3 months after corneal transplantation, respectively (P = 0.27). There was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of recipient (P = 0.21) and donor (P = 0.57) trephine sizes or BSCVA (P = 0.77). CH was measured 10.09 ± 2.5 mmHg in group 1 and 9.64 ± 2.1 mmHg in group 2 (P = 0.36). CRF was 10.13 ± 2.2 and 9.36 ± 2.1 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.17). Similarly, no significant difference was found between group 1 and group 2 in terms of IOPg (P = 0.25) and IOPcc (P = 0.80).Conclusion: DALK using the big-bubble technique for keratoconic eyes provides corneal biomechanics comparable to PK.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty as an Alternative to Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

To review the published literature on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) to compare DALK with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for the outcomes of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error, immune graft rejection, and graft survival. Searches of the peer-reviewed literature were conducted in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases. The searches were limited to citations starting in 1997, and the most recent search was in May 2009. The searches yielded 1024 citations in English-language journals. The abstracts of these articles were reviewed, and 162 articles were selected for possible clinical relevance, of which 55 were determined to be relevant to the assessment objective. Eleven DALK/PK comparative studies (level II and level III evidence) were identified that compared the results of DALK and PK procedures directly; they included 481 DALK eyes and 501 PK eyes. Of those studies reporting vision and refractive data, there was no significant difference in BSCVA between the 2 groups in 9 of the studies. There was no significant difference in spheroequivalent refraction in 6 of the studies, nor was there a significant difference in postoperative astigmatism in 9 of the studies, although the range of astigmatism was often large for both groups. Endothelial cell density (ECD) stabilized within 6 months after surgery in DALK eyes. Endothelial cell density values were higher in the DALK groups in all studies at study completion, and, in general, the ECD differences between DALK and PK groups were significant at all time points at 6 months or longer after surgery for all of the studies reporting data. On the basis of level II evidence in 1 study and level III evidence in 10 studies, DALK is equivalent to PK for the outcome measure of BSCVA, particularly if the surgical technique yields minimal residual host stromal thickness. There is no advantage to DALK for refractive error outcomes. Although improved graft survival in DALK has yet to be demonstrated, postoperative data indicate that DALK is superior to PK for preservation of ECD. Endothelial immune graft rejection cannot occur after DALK, which may simplify long-term management of DALK eyes compared with PK eyes. As an extraocular procedure, DALK has important theoretic safety advantages, and it is a good option for visual rehabilitation of corneal disease in patients whose endothelium is not compromised.

Endothelial Cell Loss and Visual Outcome of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

To compare endothelial cell (EC) loss, visual and refractive outcomes, and complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients with a corneal stromal pathology not affecting the endothelium were randomized to DALK or PK. The DALK procedure was performed according to Anwar's big-bubble technique. Patients underwent an ophthalmic examination preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Endothelial cell loss, refractive and topographic astigmatism, spherical equivalent, uncorrected visual acuity, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were measured, and complications were recorded. Endothelial cell loss was significantly higher after PK compared with DALK procedures performed without perforation of Descemet's membrane (12 months: 27.7% ± 11.1% vs. 12.9% ± 17.6%). The BSCVA was significantly better in the PK group at 3 and 6 months after surgery but was not significantly different 12 months after surgery (0.39 ± 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] in DALK and 0.31 ± 0.3 logMAR in PK). At 12 months postoperatively, refractive and topographic astigmatism in the DALK and PK groups were -3.37 ± 2.3 diopters (D) and -3.76 ± 2.1 D (P = 0.53), and 3.57 ± 2.3 D and 4.16 ± 2.0 D (P = 0.34), respectively. (Micro)perforation of the Descemet's membrane occurred in 32% (9/28) of the DALK eyes, and 18% (5/28) of the patients required conversion to PK. Endothelial cell loss was not significantly different between DALK and PK when cases with perforation of Descemet's membrane were included in the (intention-to-treat) analysis (12 months: 19.1 ± 21.6 vs. 27.7 ± 11.1 P = 0.112). Rejection episodes were reported in 1 patient in the DALK group (epithelial rejection) and 3 patients in the PK group (all endothelial rejections). No graft failure occurred. One year after DALK performed without perforation of Descemet's membrane, EC loss is significantly lower, whereas the BSCVA is comparable to that in the PK group. In addition, no endothelial rejection occurred in the DALK group. However, Descemet's membrane perforation remains a major complication in DALK and warrants improvements to standardize the big-bubble technique.

Comparison of Three Different Techniques of Corneal Transplantation for Keratoconus

To compare the visual outcomes following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and manual top-hat PK (TH-PK) in subjects undergoing corneal transplantation for keratoconus (KC). A retrospective comparative case series. settings: Cornea clinic at the Toronto Western Hospital. study population: Fifty patients who underwent corneal transplantation for KC: 17 eyes underwent DALK, 20 eyes underwent traditional PK, and 13 had TH-PK. main outcome measures: Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (UCVA, BSCVA), high-order aberrations (HOA), complication rate, and endothelial cell counts. The median BSCVA at 12 months follow-up was 20/40 in the DALK eyes and 20/30 in the traditional PK and TH-PK eyes. The mean final spherical equivalent power in the three groups was less than -1 diopter (D). The median astigmatism was less than 3.5 D in the three groups. Complication rates were similar for three groups, although the DALK group tended toward more complications. Although DALK and TH-PK procedure results in significantly shorter time to suture removal (P < .01), they caused increased levels of HOAs (P = .02). Endothelial cell counts at 12 months were significantly higher in DALK and TH-PK eyes when compared to the traditional PK eyes (P < .001). DALK, PK, and TH-PK provide comparable visual outcomes in keratoconus patients. Although DALK and TH-PK induce more HOA, they speed up the time to suture removal and provide higher endothelial cell density at one year of follow-up.

Quality of Vision and Graft Thickness in Deep Anterior Lamellar and Penetrating Corneal Allografts

To compare visual function after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with visual function after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus and correlate this with corneal thickness. Retrospective case series. Twenty-three patients (32 eyes) with unilateral or bilateral DALK or PK for keratoconus were analyzed for visual quality after suture removal. Evaluation included measurement of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations (HOAs) (WaveScan; Visx, Santa Clara, California, USA). Readings were performed with both spectacle and rigid contact lens correction of refractive error. Total and residual stromal thickness after DALK was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and correlated to visual quality. Eyes after PK had better visual acuity than eyes after DALK (P = .018). Subgroup analysis of DALK eyes revealed that the level of visual acuity was related to the thickness of residual recipient corneal stroma. Eyes with a recipient corneal bed thickness of <20 microm had visual acuities similar to eyes with a PK, whereas those with a recipient thickness of >80 microm had a significantly reduced visual acuity (P = .0009). Contrast sensitivity was similar in DALK and PK eyes. There was no significant difference in HOAs between eyes with DALK or PK. These data suggest that the main parameter for good visual function after DALK for keratoconus is the thickness of residual recipient stromal bed. An eye with a DALK with a residual bed of <20 microm can achieve a similar visual result as a PK.

C37 - Rosacée de l’enfant : manifestations cutanées et ophtalmologiques

Perception of reduced incidence of graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has attracted many surgeons towards this technique in keratoconus. This review aims to compare the visual, refractive and graft outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and DALK for keratoconus.Electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), ClinicalTrial.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were performed. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparative studies to assess primary and secondary outcomes after PK and DALK in eyes with keratoconus. Primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR at ≥6 months. Secondary outcomes included number of patients with BCVA ≥ 0 LogMAR, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) LogMAR, spherical equivalent (SE), refractive and keratometric astigmatism, endothelial cell density (ECD) cell/mm2, graft rejection and graft survival.Eighteen studies (including 2 RCTs) compared DALK (965 eyes) and PK (2402 eyes) for keratoconus. There was strong evidence through RCTs suggesting better LogMAR BCVA at ≥6 months and better LogMAR UCVA with PK; reduced refractive astigmatism and rejection with DALK and no difference in SE and keratometric astigmatism. Moreover, there was weak evidence to suggest better BCVA ≥ 0 LogMAR after PK and no difference in ECD between the two techniques.Despite the popularity of DALK amongst corneal surgeons for keratoconus, there is a paucity of high quality RCTs. The existing limited evidence confirms reduced rejection and refractive astigmatism with DALK but better visual outcomes with PK. Internationally agreed data sets and follow-up protocol are warranted.