Decompressive Craniectomy Group Research Articles

Clot removAl with or without decompRessive craniectomy under ICP monitoring for supratentorial IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (CARICH): a randomized controlled trial.

Decompressive craniectomy, a surgery to remove part of the skull and open the dura mater, maybe an effective treatment for controlling intracranial hypertension. It remains great interest to elucidate whether decompressive craniectomy is beneficial to intracerebral hemorrhage patients who warrant clot removal to prevent intracranial hypertension. The trial was a prospective, pragmatic, controlled trial involving adult patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who were undergoing removal of hematoma. Intracerebral hemorrhage patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratioto undergo clot removal with or without decompressive craniectomy under the monitoring of intracranial pressure. The primary outcome was the proportion of unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the mortality at 3 months and the occurrence of re-operation. A total of 102 patients were assigned to the clot removal with decompressive craniectomy group and 102 to the clot removal group. Median hematoma volume was 54.0 mL (range 30-80mL) and median preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale was 10 (range 5-15). At 3 months, 94 patients (92.2%) in clot removal with decompressive craniectomy group and 83 patients (81.4%) in the clot removal group had unfavorable functional outcome (P=0.023). Fourteen patients (13.7%) in the clot removal with decompressive craniectomy group died versus five patients (4.9%) in the clot removal group (P=0.030). The number of patients with re-operation was similar between the clot removal with decompressive craniectomy group and clot removal group (5.9% vs. 3.9%; P=0.517). Postoperative intracranial pressure values were not significantly different between two groups and the mean values were less than 20mmHg. Clot removal without decompressive craniectomy decreased the rate of modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6 and mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, compared with clot removal with decompressive craniectomy.

Surgical strategies in acute subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis of decompressive craniectomy vs. craniotomy.

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) stands as a significant contributor to morbidity after severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The primary treatment approach for patients experiencing progressive neurological deficits or notable mass effects is the surgical removal of the hematoma, which can be achieved through craniotomy (CO) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). Nevertheless, the choice between these two procedures remains a subject of ongoing debate and controversy. We conducted a comprehensive literature review, utilizing prominent online databases and manually searching references related to craniotomy and craniectomy for subdural hematoma evacuation up to November 2023. Our analysis focused on outcome variables such as the presence of residual subdural hematoma, the need for revision procedures, and overall clinical outcomes. We included a total of 11 comparative studies in our analysis, encompassing 4269 patients, with 2979 undergoing craniotomy and 1290 undergoing craniectomy, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent craniectomy displayed significantly lower scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during their initial presentation. Following surgery, the DC group exhibited a significantly reduced rate of residual subdural (P = 0.009). Additionally, the likelihood of a poor outcome during follow-up was lower in the CO group. Likewise, the mortality rate was lower in the CO group compared to the craniectomy group (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, I2 = 84%, P = 0.04). Our study found that CO was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of mortality, reoperation rate, and functional outcome while DC was associated with less likelihood of residual subdural hematoma. Upon further investigation of patient characteristics who underwent into either of these interventions, it was very clear that patients in DC cohort have more serious and low pre-op characteristics than the CO group. Nonetheless, brain herniation and advanced age act as independent factor for predicting the outcome irrespective of the intervention.

1128 Outcomes of Early and Late Decompressive Craniectomies in Contrast to Standard Medical Management in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Refractory Intracranial Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Abstract Aim The meta-analysis explored the effectiveness of early and late decompressive craniectomies versus medical management in patients with refractory intracranial hypertension after sustaining traumatic brain injury. The clinical outcomes analysed were grouped into 2 categories: favourable (good recovery and moderate disability) and unfavourable outcomes (death, vegetative state, and severe disability). Intracranial pressure has been measured post-randomisation in the studies included. Method Google Scholar, Cochrane and Medline search engines were utilised for data collection ranging from 1999 until present. The searched keywords encompassed: decompressive craniectomy, refractory intracranial hypertension, medical management, and traumatic brain injury. Thereafter, the data was uploaded to Review Manager for statistical analysis. Results Of the 122 articles, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis yielded that relative risk (RR) of overall mortality in decompressive craniectomy group vs medical management is 0.58 95% CI [0.41, 0.81] (P = 0.001). The standardised mean difference (SMD) for intracranial pressure is -2.59 95% CI [-3.72, -1.46] (P < 0.00001) between the two groups. The odds ratio considering favourable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale) for patients undergoing surgery vs medical care is 1.02 95% [0.57, 1.82] (P = 0.95). Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrates that decompressive craniectomy significantly reduces the overall mortality and intracranial pressure in patients with TBI and refractory intracranial hypertension versus medical management. Decompressive craniectomy has a greater potential to treat TBI patients with refractory intracranial hypertension than medical care alone however more randomised clinical trials are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of the superiority of these treatments in the future research.

The significance of decompressive craniectomy for older patients with traumatic brain injury: a propensity score matching analysis from large multi-center data

The efficacy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been investigated in two recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and DC is recommended as an optional treatment for improving overall survival compared to medical treatment. However, the two RCTs enrolled extremely young adults, and the efficacy of DC in older adults remains questionable. Therefore, to identify the efficacy of DC in older adults, we compared patients who received medical care with those who underwent DC after propensity score matching (PSM). From the Korea Multi-center Traumatic Brain Injury Database, 443 patients identified as having intracranial hypertension and a necessity of DC were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were classified into the DC (n = 375) and non-DC (n = 68) groups according to operation records. The PSM was conducted to match the patients in the DC group with those receiving medical care (non-DC). After PSM, the newly matched group (DC, n = 126) was compared with patients without DC (non-DC, n = 63). The mean difference in the logit of the propensity scores (LPS) was 0.00391 and the mean age of enrolled patients were 65 years. The results of the comparative analyses after PSM showed that the 6-month mortality rate of the non-DC group was higher than that of the DC group (61.9% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.179). In terms of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score < 4), the DC group showed a lower rate of favorable mRS scores (11.9% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.296) than the non-DC group.

Decompressive craniectomy as a second/third-tier intervention in traumatic brain injury: A multicenter observational study

ObjectivesRESCUEicp studied decompressive craniectomy (DC) applied as third-tier option in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in a randomized controlled setting and demonstrated a decrease in mortality with similar rates of favorable outcome in the DC group compared to the medical management group. In many centers, DC is being used in combination with other second/third-tier therapies. The aim of the present study is to investigate outcomes from DC in a prospective non-RCT context. MethodsThis is a prospective observational study of 2 patient cohorts: one from the University Hospitals Leuven (2008–2016) and one from the Brain-IT study, a European multicenter database (2003–2005). In thirty-seven patients with refractory elevated intracranial pressure who underwent DC as a second/third-tier intervention, patient, injury and management variables including physiological monitoring data and administration of thiopental were analysed, as well as Extended Glasgow Outcome score (GOSE) at 6 months. ResultsIn the current cohorts, patients were older than in the surgical RESCUEicp cohort (mean 39.6 vs. 32.3; p < 0.001), had higher Glasgow Motor Score on admission (GMS < 3 in 24.3% vs. 53.0%; p = 0.003) and 37.8% received thiopental (vs. 9.4%; p < 0.001). Other variables were not significantly different. GOSE distribution was: death 24.3%; vegetative 2.7%; lower severe disability 10.8%; upper severe disability 13.5%; lower moderate disability 5.4%; upper moderate disability 2.7%, lower good recovery 35.1%; and upper good recovery 5.4%. The outcome was unfavorable in 51.4% and favorable in 48.6%, as opposed to 72.6% and 27.4% respectively in RESCUEicp (p = 0.02). ConclusionOutcomes in DC patients from two prospective cohorts reflecting everyday practice were better than in RESCUEicp surgical patients. Mortality was similar, but fewer patients remained vegetative or severely disabled and more patients had a good recovery. Although patients were older and injury severity was lower, a potential partial explanation may be in the pragmatic use of DC in combination with other second/third-tier therapies in real-life cohorts. The findings underscore that DC maintains an important role in managing severe TBI.

Decompressive Craniectomy versus Craniotomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma

BackgroundTraumatic acute subdural hematomas frequently warrant surgical evacuation by means of a craniotomy (bone flap replaced) or decompressive craniectomy (bone flap not replaced). Craniectomy may prevent intracranial hypertension, but whether it is associated with better outcomes is unclear.MethodsWe conducted a trial in which patients undergoing surgery for traumatic acute subdural hematoma were randomly assigned to undergo craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. An inclusion criterion was a bone flap with an anteroposterior diameter of 11 cm or more. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to “upper good recovery” [no injury-related problems]) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the GOSE rating at 6 months and quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).ResultsA total of 228 patients were assigned to the craniotomy group and 222 to the decompressive craniectomy group. The median diameter of the bone flap was 13 cm (interquartile range, 12 to 14) in both groups. The common odds ratio for the differences across GOSE ratings at 12 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.18; P=0.32). Results were similar at 6 months. At 12 months, death had occurred in 30.2% of the patients in the craniotomy group and in 32.2% of those in the craniectomy group; a vegetative state occurred in 2.3% and 2.8%, respectively, and a lower or upper good recovery occurred in 25.6% and 19.9%. EQ-5D-5L scores were similar in the two groups at 12 months. Additional cranial surgery within 2 weeks after randomization was performed in 14.6% of the craniotomy group and in 6.9% of the craniectomy group. Wound complications occurred in 3.9% of the craniotomy group and in 12.2% of the craniectomy group.ConclusionsAmong patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy, disability and quality-of-life outcomes were similar with the two approaches. Additional surgery was performed in a higher proportion of the craniotomy group, but more wound complications occurred in the craniectomy group. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; RESCUE-ASDH ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN87370545.)

Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious medical condition that often leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is now widely recognized as a primary or secondary treatment option for managing intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe TBI. However, there is a lack of clarity in reviews regarding the impact of DC on TBI outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of DC in terms of overall mortality and long-term prognosis among patients with TBI. We conducted a systematic search of four common databases to include all parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We selected studies that reported outcomes for TBI cases, with DC as a treatment option. The outcomes examined included reduction in mortality, ICP levels, and the proportion of patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score >4. Our review finally included eight RCTs [n = 1458, with 749 and 709 patients in the DC and control groups, respectively]. The weighted mean difference for ICP was estimated at -4.01 (95% Confidence interval [CI]: -5.31--2.71), indicating a statistically significant reduction in ICP levels in the DC group compared to the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51-0.89), suggesting a statistically significant 31% decrease in mortality levels in the DC group. Subgroup and sensitivity analyzes were also conducted to address heterogeneity. In conclusion, based on our meta-analysis, we find that DC can be considered a crucial surgical intervention for reducing mortality among patients with TBI when compared to control groups.

Degree Of Cisternal Compression As An Independent Prognostic Factor For Outcome In Both Craniotomy and Primary Decompressive Craniectomy Groups In Acute Subdural Hematoma Population

Degree Of Cisternal Compression As An Independent Prognostic Factor For Outcome In Both Craniotomy and Primary Decompressive Craniectomy Groups In Acute Subdural Hematoma Population

The contribution of intracranial pressure to human dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute brain injury.

Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is normally expressed by the difference between mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) but comparison of the separate contributions of MAP and ICP to human cerebral blood flow autoregulation has not been reported. In ABI patients, internal jugular vein compression (IJVC) was performed for 60 s. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) was assessed in recordings of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler), and invasive measurements of MAP and ICP. Patients were separated according to injury severity as having whole/undamaged skull, large fractures or craniotomies, or following decompressive craniectomy. Glasgow coma score was not different for the three groups. IJVC induced changes in MCAv, MAP, ICP, and CPP in all three groups. The MCAv response to step changes in MAP and ICP expressed the dCA response to these two inputs, and was quantified with the autoregulation index (ARI). In 85 patients, ARI was lower for the ICP input as compared to the MAP input (2.25 ± 2.46 vs 3.39 ± 2.28; p<0.0001), and particularly depressed in the DC group (n=24, 0.35 ± 0.62 vs 2.21 ± 1.96; p<0.0005). In patients with ABI, the dCA response to changes in ICP is less efficient than corresponding responses to MAP changes. These results should be taken into consideration in studies aimed to optimize dCA by manipulation of CPP in neurocritical patients.

Surgical Modality as a Determinant of Survival and Neurological Outcome Following the Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematomas

Objective: We designed the present study to compare the clinical outcomes of the craniotomy and the decompressive craniectomy procedures that we had performed in our department for evacuating traumatic acute subdural hematomas.&#x0D; Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical data of all the adult patients in whom a craniotomy or a decompressive craniectomy had been performed for evacuating acute traumatic subdural hematoma. The demographic data, the preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and the clinical outcome were studied.&#x0D; Results: A craniotomy had been carried out in five patients for traumatic AcSDH evacuation while in twelve patients a decompressive craniectomy had been performed. The mean preoperative GCS was 9 in the patients that underwent a craniotomy, whereas the mean preoperative GCS in the decompressive craniectomy group was 6.8. The overall mortality was 47%. In the craniotomy group, 4 (80%) patients survived and 1 (20%) patient expired. In the decompressive craniectomy group, 5 (41.7%) patients survived and 7 (58.3%) patients expired. The outcome in all the 9 surviving patients was favorable based on the Glasgow Outcome scale and all of them were independent of follow-up.&#x0D; Conclusion: Better clinical outcome was observed in patients who had undergone a craniotomy compared to those in whom a decompressive craniectomy had been performed. Patients that underwent a craniotomy were also in a better clinical status preoperatively compared to patients who underwent a decompressive craniectomy.

Craniotomy or Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma? Difference in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Objective This article compares the outcomes of patients with traumatic acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH) managed either with craniotomy (CO) or with decompressive craniectomy (DC). Methods In this single-center, retrospective analysis we included all adult patients with acute traumatic SDH who were treated either using CO or DC. Sixteen-year hospital data was reviewed for patient demographics, injury details, and hospital course. Outcomes were noted in terms of intraoperative blood loss, intensive care unit stay, need for tracheostomy, post-surgery Glasgow Coma Score (GCS; calculated immediately after surgery), delayed GCS (DGCS; calculated 1 week after surgery), and delayed Glasgow Outcome Score (DGOS) after 6 months of surgery. Postoperative complications were noted during hospital stay, while mortality was noted within 6 months of surgery for each patient. Results Patients who underwent DC were younger (mean age 34.4 ± 16.8 years vs. 42.4 ± 19.9 years in the CO group) ( p = 0.006). Patients who underwent DC also had worst degree of traumatic brain injury as per Marshall grade (62.4% patients with Marshall grade 4 in the DC group vs. only 41.2% patients in the CO group) ( p = 0.037). Mean size of hematoma was 23.8 ± 24.6 mm in the DC group versus 11.3 ± 8.2 mm in the CO group ( p = 0.001). Mean postop GCS was lower in the DC group; 8.0 ± 4 versus 10.8 ± 4 in the CO group ( p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in DGCS and DGOS between the DC and CO groups ( p = 0.76 and 0.90, respectively). Mortality rate was 24 (30.8%) in the DC group versus 18 (20.7%) in the CO group ( p = 0.14). Conclusion The patients who underwent DC were younger, had larger size hematoma, and poor Marshall grade. We did not find any significant difference in the outcomes of CO and DC for management of subdural hematoma.

Decompressive Craniectomy for the Treatment of Severe Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading public health problems across the world. TBI is associated with high economic costs to the healthcare system specially in developing countries. Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure in which an area of the skull is removed to increase the volume of intracranial compartment. There are various techniques of decompressive craniectomy used that include subtemporal and circular decompression, and unilateral or bilateral frontotemporoparietal decompression. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of decompressive craniectomy for the management of severe TBI versus conservative management alone at the Department of Neurosurgery, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Methods The study (randomized controlled trial) was conducted from February 1, 2014, till June 30, 2017. Results A total of 136 patients were included after following the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to two groups, making it 68 patients in each study group. There were 89 males and 47 females. All the patients received standard care recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation. The mortality rate observed at 6 months in decompressive craniectomy was 22.05%, while among conservative management group, it was 45.58%. Difference in mortality of both groups at 6 months was significant. Total 61.76% (42) of patients from decompressive craniectomy group had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4-5) at 6 months. While among conservative management group, total 35.29% (24) had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4-5). Difference in Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months of both groups was significant. Conclusion In conclusion, decompressive craniectomy is simple, safe, and better than conservative management alone.

Decompressive Craniectomy vs. Craniotomy Only for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity-Matched Study of Long-Term Outcomes in Neuropsychology.

BackgroundBoth decompressive craniectomy (DC) and craniotomy only (CO) are commonly performed to treat patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) by evacuation of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and control intracranial pressure (ICP). The outcomes of these two procedures have been well-studied; however, most research studies have focused on physical functions. The purpose of our study is to assess long-term outcomes in neuropsychology after DC or CO in TBI patients.MethodsInformation was collected from patients with TBI who had undergone DC or CO and were then in the postoperative stable phase (6–24 months after injury). Propensity scoring matched the patients in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, cause of injury, TBI subtype, TBI severity, computed tomography (CT) findings, surgery side, and interval from TBI. We used Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Chinese Revision (WAIS-RC), Wechsler Memory Scale-Chinese Revision (WMS-RC), Physical Self-maintenance Scale (PSMS), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) to measure the long-term outcomes in TBI patients, especially in neuropsychology.ResultsThere were 120 TBI patients included in our study. After matching, 74 patients were paired into the DC group (n = 37) and the CO group (n = 37). There were no differences in the gender (P = 1.000), age at injury (P = 0.268), marital status (P = 0.744), pre-injury employment (P = 0.711), comorbidities (P = 1.000), education level (P = 0.969), cause of injury (P = 0.357), TBI subtype (P = 0.305), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) total score (P = 0.193), unconsciousness (P = 0.485), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) (P = 0.102), unresponsive pupil (P = 1.000), midline shift (P = 0.409), cisterns compressed or absent (P = 0.485), surgery side (P = 0.795), and interval from TBI (P = 0.840) between the two groups. The CO group was associated with better cognitive function in WAIS-RC OIQ (P = 0.030) and WAIS-RC FIQ (P = 0.021) and better daily function in IADL (P = 0.028) and ADL total (P = 0.030). The DC group also had a lower GOSE (P = 0.004) score compared to the CO group. No difference was observed in WAIS-VIQ (P = 0.062), WMS-RC MQ (P = 0.162), and PSMS (P = 0.319).ConclusionIn the matched cohort, patients who underwent CO had better long-term outcomes in cognitive and daily function compared with DC. Future randomized control trials are needed for intensive studies on physical and neuropsychological prognosis in TBI patients.

Cisternostomy versus Decompressive Craniectomy for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is to avoid secondary brain injury. Decompressive craniectomy has been shown to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP), but it actually provides an outlet for brain tissue to expand without reducing edema. Basal cisternostomy is an emerging microsurgical technique to manage cerebral edema in TBI. Cerebrospinal fluid is released from basal cisterns, which reduces cerebral edema. We compared outcomes of cisternostomy with decompressive craniectomy in a randomized controlled trial and studied the effectiveness of cisternostomy in decreasing cerebral edema. All enrolled patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups and assessed clinically and radiologically. TBIs were categorized as mild, moderate, and severe injuries, and Marshall computed tomography-based score was assessed. Intraoperative ICP was measured in both groups. Outcomes were assessed based on postoperative intensive care unit stay, days on ventilator support, and Glasgow Outcome Scale score. There were 50 patients randomly assigned to 2 groups (25 patients in each group). Mortality rate was 32% (8 deaths) in the cisternostomy group and 44% (11 deaths) in the decompressive craniectomy group. Patients in the cisternostomy group had decreased mean days of ventilator support and intensive care unit stay. Cisternostomy resulted in significant decreases in ICP after craniotomy. Age, time from trauma to surgery, and Marshall score showed prognostic importance on outcomes. Cisternostomy was effective in reducing ICP in patients with TBI. Good Glasgow Outcome Scale scores and low rates of complications were found in the postoperative period after cisternostomy. Age, presenting Glasgow Coma Scale score, Marshall score, other major injuries, and time from trauma to surgery had a significant prognostic impact on outcome in management of TBI.

Impact of decompressive craniectomy on functional outcome of severe acquired brain injuries patients, at discharge from intensive inpatient rehabilitation

Purpose Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving procedure conducted to treat refractory intracranial hypertension. Although DC reduces mortality of severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) survivors, it has been associated with severe long-term disability. This observational study compares functional outcomes at discharge from an Intensive Rehabilitative Unit (IRU) between sABI patients with and without DC. Material and methods sABI patients undergoing DC before entering the Don Gnocchi Foundation IRU were compared with a group of sABI patients who did not undergo DC (No-DC group), after matching it by age, sex, aetiology, time post-onset, and clinical status. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of sABI, age 18+, time from the event <90 days. Results A total of 87 (DC: 47) patients were included (median age: 60.5 [IQR = 17.47]). The two groups did not differ for admission clinical features except for the tracheostomy presence (more frequent in DC, p < 0.001). No significant differences were also found at discharge. DC group presented a significantly longer length-of-stay than No-DC group (p < 0.001) and a longer time to tracheostomy removal (p = 0.036). DC was not found to influence outcomes as consciousness improvement, tracheostomy removal, oral intake and functional independence. Conclusions sABI patients with DC improved after rehabilitation as much as No-DC patients did but they required a longer stay. Implications for Rehabilitation Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is practiced during the acute phase after hemorrhagic, ischemic, traumatic severe brain injury as a life-saving procedure to treat refractory intracranial hypertension DC has been associated with follow-up severe long-term disability, but no study yet addressed whether DC may affect intensive rehabilitation outcomes. Undergoing a DC is not a negative prognostic factor for achieving rehabilitation goals after a severe acquired brain injury DC must be taken into account when customizing rehabilitation pathway especially because these patients required a longer time to reach the outcomes.

The effect of hematoma puncture drainage before decompressive craniectomy on the prognosis of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage with cerebral hernia at a high altitude

PurposeRapid decompressive craniectomy (DC) was the most effective method for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) with cerebral hernia, but the mortality and disability rate is still high. We suspected that hematoma puncture drainage (PD) + DC may improve the therapeutic effect and thus compared the combined surgery with DC alone. MethodsFrom December 2013 to July 2019, patients with HICH from Linzhi, Tibet and Honghe, Yunnan Province were retrospectively analyzed. The selection criteria were as follows: (1) altitude ≥1500 m; (2) HICH patients with cerebral hernia; (3) Glascow coma scale score of 4–8 and time from onset to admission ≤3 h; (4) good liver and kidney function; and (5) complete case data. The included patients were divided into DC group and PD + DC group. The patients were followed up for 6 months. The outcome was assessed by Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score, Kaplan-Meier survival curve and correlation between time from admission to operation and prognosis. A good outcome was defined as independent (GOS score, 4-5) and poor outcome defined as dependent (GOS score, 3-1). All data analyses were performed using SPSS 19, and comparison between two groups was conducted using separate t-tests or Chi-square tests. ResultsA total of 65 patients was included. The age ranged 34-90 years (mean, 63.00 ± 14.04 years). Among them, 31 patients had the operation of PD + DC, whereas 34 patients underwent DC. The two groups had no significant difference in the basic characteristics. After 6 months of follow-up, in the PD + DC group there were 8 death, 4 vegetative state, 4 severe disability (GOS score 1-3, poor outcome 51.6 %); 8 moderate disability, and 7 good recovery (GOS score 4-5, good outcome 48.4 %); while in the DC group the result was 15 death, 6 vegetative state, 5 severe disability (poor outcome 76.5 %), 4 moderate disability and 4 good recovery (good outcome 23.5 %). The GOS score and good outcome were significantly less in DC group than in PD + DC group (Z = −1.993, p = 0.046; χ2 = 4.38, p = 0.043). However, there was no significant difference regarding the survival curve between PD + DC group and DC group. The correlation between the time from admission to operation and GOS at 6 months (r = −0.41, R2 = 0.002, p = 0.829) was not significant in the PD + DC group, but significant in the DC group (r = −0.357, R2 = 0.128, p = 0.038). ConclusionPD + DC treatment can improve the good outcomes better than DC treatment for HICH with cerebral hernia at a high altitude.

Intracranial Compliance Assessed by Intracranial Pressure Pulse Waveform.

Background: Morphological alterations in intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse waveform (ICPW) secondary to intracranial hypertension (ICP >20 mmHg) and a reduction in intracranial compliance (ICC) are well known indicators of neurological severity. The exclusive exploration of modifications in ICPW after either the loss of skull integrity or surgical procedures for intracranial hypertension resolution is not a common approach studied. The present study aimed to assess the morphological alterations in ICPW among neurocritical care patients with skull defects and decompressive craniectomy (DC) by comparing the variations in ICPW features according to elevations in mean ICP values. Methods: Patients requiring ICP monitoring because of acute brain injury were included. A continuous record of 10 min-length for the beat-by-beat analysis of ICPW was performed, with ICP elevation produced by means of ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein compression at the end of the record. ICPW features (peak amplitude ratio (P2/P1), time interval to pulse peak (TTP) and pulse amplitude) were counterweighed between baseline and compression periods. Results were distributed for three groups: intact skull (exclusive burr hole for ICP monitoring), craniotomy/large fractures (group 2) or DC (group 3). Results: 57 patients were analyzed. A total of 21 (36%) presented no skull defects, 21 (36%) belonged to group 2, whereas 15 (26%) had DC. ICP was not significantly different between groups: ±15.11 for intact, 15.33 for group 2 and ±20.81 mmHg for group 3, with ICP-induced elevation also similar between groups (p = 0.56). Significant elevation was observed for the P2/P1 ratio for groups 1 and 2, whereas a reduction was observed in group 3 (elevation of ±0.09 for groups 1 and 2, but a reduction of 0.03 for group 3, p = 0.01), and no significant results were obtained for TTP and pulse amplitudes. Conclusion: In the present study, intracranial pressure pulse waveform analysis indicated that intracranial compliance was significantly more impaired among decompressive craniectomy patients, although ICPW indicated DC to be protective for further influences of ICP elevations over the brain. The analysis of ICPW seems to be an alternative to real-time ICC assessment.

Decompressive craniectomy combined with mild hypothermia in patients with large hemispheric infarction: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe effect of hypothermia on large hemispheric infarction (LHI) remains controversial. Our study aimed to explore the therapeutic outcomes of decompressive craniectomy (DC) combined with hypothermia on LHI.MethodsPatients were randomly divided into three groups: the DC group, the DC plus head surface cooling (DCSC) group and the DC plus endovascular hypothermia (DCEH) group. The DC group was maintained normothermia. The DCSC group received 24-h ice cap on the head for 7 days. While the DCEH group were given endovascular hypothermia (34 °C). Mortality and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months were evaluated.ResultsThirty-four patients were included in the study. Mortality of the DC, DCSC and DCEH groups at discharge were 22.2% (2/9), 0% (0/14) and 9.1% (1/11), respectively. However, it increased to 44.4% (4/9), 21.4% (3/14) and 45.5% (5/11) at 6 months, respectively (p = 0.367). Pneumonia (8 cases) was the leading cause of death after discharge. Twelve cases (35.3%) achieved good neurological outcome (mRS 0–3) at 6 months. The proportions of good neurological outcome in the DC, DCSC and DCEH groups were 22.2% (2/9 cases), 42.9% (6/14 cases) and 36.4% (4/11), respectively. The DCSC group seemed to have higher proportion of good outcomes, but there was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.598). Among survivors, endovascular hypothermia had a higher proportion of good outcome (DC group, 2/5 cases, 40.0%; DCSC group, 6/11 cases, 54.5%; DCEH group, 4/6 cases, 66.7%; p = 0.696). The incidence of complications in the DCEH group was higher than those of the DC and DCSC groups (18.9%, 12.0%, and 12.1%, respectively; p = 0.025).ConclusionsThere is still no evidence to confirm that hypothermia further reduces long-term mortality and improves neurological outcomes in LHI patients with DC. However, there is a trend to benefit survivors from hypothermia. A local cooling method may be a better option for DC patients, which has little impact on systematic complications.Trial registrationDecompressive Hemicraniectomy Combined Hypothermia in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct, ChiCTR-TRC-12002698. Registered 11 Oct 2012- Retrospectively registered, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=6854.

P0007 / #630: DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE INSTITUTION TRAUMA REGISTRY.

Aims & Objectives: Background Trauma is the leading cause of death in children older than one year. Approximately, 10% of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions are injury-related, whilst severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) is the most common diagnosis. Being decompressive craniectomy (DC) a therapeutic option, both the indications and the timing to perform it remain controversial. Objective To characterize the PICU-admitted patient with STBI undergoing DC. Methods: Retrospective review of a single-hospital PICU trauma registry, including deidentified data from all admissions from 2000-2019. We evaluated age, sex, injury mechanism, length of stay, trauma scores, TRISS-derived survival probability and discharge condition from PICU. Data are described as count (percentage) or median (interquartile range). Comparisons were made by Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. Results: We identified 297 injured patients of whom 226 had at least one brain injury with an AIS severity >=2. From these, 81 had STBI (admission Glasgow scale <9). Median age was 60 months (36-120) and 51.9% were male. Falls (54.3%) and pedestrians (19.7%) were the most frequent mechanisms. Blunt trauma accounted for 82.7%. Crude mortality was 17.3% (25.0% in 2000-09 and 8.3% in 2010-19, p=0.075). We identified 16 patients with DC (19.8%): 15.9% in 2000-09 and 25% in 2010-2019). The most common tomographic diagnosis in DC group was TCDB type III (50.0%) while in no DC it was type II (29.2%), p=0.035.Conclusions: In this sample from a single institution, we observed a growing indication of DC. The small sample size preempted us from doing a multivariable analysis.

Effects of Primary Decompressive Craniectomy on the Outcomes of Serious Traumatic Brain Injury with Mass Lesions, and Independent Predictors of Operation Decision

Although operative indications for traumatic brain injury (TBI) are known, neurosurgeons are unsure whether to remove the bone flap after mass lesion extraction, and an efficient scoring system for predicting which patients should undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC) does not exist. Nine parameters were assessed. In total, 245 patients with severe TBI were retrospectively assessed from June 2015 to May 2019, who underwent DC or craniotomy to remove mass lesions. The 6-month mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were compared between the DC and craniotomy groups. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regression equations, receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained for predicting the decision for DC. The overall 6-month mortality in the entire cohort was 11.43% (28/245). Patients undergoing DC had lower mean preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P= 0.01), and higher amounts of individuals with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 6 (P= 0.007), unresponsive pupillary light reflex (P < 0.001), closed basal cisterns (P < 0.001), and diffuse injury (P= 0.025), compared with the craniotomy group. Because of high disease severity, individuals administered primary DC showed increased 6-month mortality compared with the craniotomy group. However, in surviving patients, favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale rates were similar in both groups. Pupillary light reflex and basal cisterns were independent predictors of the DC decision. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, the model had sensitivity and specificity of 81.6% and 84.9%, respectively, in predicting the probability of DC. These preliminary data showed that primary DC may benefit some patients with severe TBI with mass lesions. In addition, unresponsive preoperative pupil reaction and closed basal cistern could predict the DC decision.