Decline Of Residual Renal Function Research Articles

#2752 Decline of residual renal function in peritoneal patients: in search of the lost kidney?

Abstract Background and Aims The latest (2020) recommendations of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis have proposed a new paradigm of adequacy. In this context, preserving residual renal function (RRF) is considered one of the most important therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality. Incremental peritoneal dialysis can contribute to preserving RRF. The goal of this study is to evaluate factors which are associated with a decline in RRF in APD patients. Method We conducted a retrospective study of incidental peritoneal dialysis patients between 2020 and 2022. We started considering 62 patients who underwent APD. 23 were excluded due to lack of data, follow-up of less than 1 year, need for haemodialysis sessions before or during follow-up, interfering surgery (bariatric surgery and nephrectomy) and treatment using the CAPD technique. We analyzed data from 39 APD patients (see Table 1) and classified them into two groups based on their RRF decline using the cut-off of 1 ml/min/year (calculated as the mean of urea and creatinine clearance). They were distinguished into slow progressors and fast progressors and we identified any differences in clinical and dialysis parameters at baseline and 12-month follow-up. We calculated dialytic, renal and total Kt/V in both groups and looked for possible predictors of faster RRF loss. For statistical analysis, we used ANOVA for continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis for non-continuous variables and Fisher for qualitative variables. Finally, predictive data were extracted using logistic regression. Results We found 22 slow progressors and 17 fast progressors. A significant difference was found in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (18.2% vs 47.1%, p 0.028), residual renal function (5.71 ml/min vs 6.85 ml/min, p 0,03) and dialysing solution volumes (13.2 L vs 14.1 L, p 0.05) between the two groups, with higher values in the fast progressors. In this group, more male patients were also observed (p 0.11), treated with 2 or more antihypertensive drugs (p 0.30) and exposed to higher weekly dialysate glucose (p 0.23) and daily ultrafiltration rates (p 0.23). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean decline in renal function was -1, 56 ml/min in the entire sample, -3.03 ml/min in the fast progressors group and -0.43 ml/min in the slow progressors group; the change in daily Uf inversely correlated with the change in RRF (p 0.025; r -0.35, Fig. 1). There was a mean reduction in ultrafiltrate volume (-22.7 ml vs +123.5 ml, p 0.028) and in the amount of glucose in the dialysing solutions (-138.6 g vs +100.5 g, p 0.007) compared to baseline values in patients who preserved RRF. In contrast, the difference between the two groups in the number of patients who started PD with<5 sessions per week is borderline (p 0.099). Weekly dialysis Kt/V is higher in fast-progressor patients (1 vs 0.88; p 0.205) with a total weekly Kt/V in both cases above the recommended target of 1.7. On multivariate regression analysis, baseline renal function and the presence of heart disease correlate with a more rapid decline in RRF (p 0.047; p 0.021 respectively). Conclusion With the limitations of low sample size and short follow-up time, we observed that ultrafiltration and peritoneal exposure to dialysate glucose may play a role in RRF loss, but more research is needed to confirm this. We found that patients with heart disease and higher baseline RRF were more likely to experience a faster decline in RRF. Overall findings suggest that maintaining RRF is crucial in APD patients, and incremental dialysis can help preserve it. We recommend further studies with longer follow-up times to better understand the relationship between RRF and APD.

Intra-abdominal pressure and residual renal function decline in peritoneal dialysis: a threshold-based investigation

Background The potential impact of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on residual renal function (RRF) has not been determined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between IAP and the rate of RRF decline in newly initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and to identify the optimal IAP threshold value for delaying the deterioration of RRF. Methods A cohort of 62 newly initiated PD patients who completed both 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations was obtained using the Durand method. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with a rapid decline in RRF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal threshold value. Another retrospective cohort analysis was performed to validate the identified critical value. Results For each 1 cmH2O increase in IAP, the risk of a rapid decline in the RRF increased by a factor of 1.679. Subsequent analysis revealed that patients in the high IAP group had more significant decreases in residual renal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Z = −3.694, p < 0.001) and urine volume (Z = −3.121, p < 0.001) than did those in the non-high IAP group. Furthermore, an IAP ≥15.65 cmH2O was a robust discriminator for the prediction of the rate of RRF decline. Conclusion Patients in the high IAP group experienced a more rapid decline in RRF. Additionally, an optimal critical pressure of 15.65 cmH2O was identified for predicting the rate of RRF decline. IAP, as one of the factors contributing to the rapid decline in RRF in the first year of PD, should be given due attention.

The relationship between decline rate of residual renal function in the first year and mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

To assess the relationship between the rate of residual renal function (RRF) decline in the first year and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Incident PD patients were divided into two groups by the corresponding RRF decline value, when hazard ratio (HR) = 1 was found by the restricted cubic spline. The associations of rate of decline of RRF in the first year with mortality were evaluated. Of 497 PD patients, 122 patients died. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in fast-decline group had a significant increase risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.97 and 2.09, respectively). Each 0.1-mL/min/1.73 m2 /month decrease in RRF in the first year of PD was associated with a 19% and 20% higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Faster decline of RRF in the first year was independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients.

Impact of Weight Gain on the Subsequent Survival of New Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Introduction: Obesity at the initiation of dialysis was reported to adversely affect the clinical outcome of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and weight gain is common after started on PD. However, there are few studies on the prognostic implications of weight gain after PD. Methods: We reviewed the change in body weight of 954 consecutive patients during the first 2 years of PD in a single Hong Kong center. Their subsequent clinical outcomes, including patient and technique survival rates, hospitalization, and peritonitis rates, were analyzed. Results: The mean age was 60.3 ± 12.2 years; 535 patients (56.1%) were men, and 504 (52.8%) had diabetes. From 1995–1999 to 2015–2019, the percentage of body weight gain during the first 2 years of PD was 1.0 ± 7.9%, 1.6 ± 7.1%, 1.6 ± 7.2%, 3.9 ± 9.5%, and 4.0 ± 10.3% for each 5-year period, respectively (p for linearity <0.0001). The subsequent 5-year patient survival rates were 29.9%, 43.3%, 40.5%, 43.6%, and 43.3% for patients with weight loss >5%, weight loss 2–5%, weight change with ±2%, weight gain 2–5%, and weight gain >5% during the first 2 years on PD, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.035). With multivariable Cox regression model to adjust for clinical confounders, weight loss >5% during the first 2 years of PD was associated with a worse patient survival rate subsequently (adjusted hazard ratio 4.118, 95% confidence interval 1.040–16.313, p = 0.044), while weight gain was not associated with subsequent patient survival. Weight change during the first 2 years of PD does not appear to affect subsequent technique survival, hospitalization, decline in residual renal function, or peritonitis rate. Discussion and Conclusions: Weight gain is common during the first 2 years of PD, but weight gain does not appear to have any significant impact on the subsequent outcome. In contrast, weight loss >5% was significantly associated with worse patient survival subsequently.

PP08 Evaluation Of Nutritional Status In Diabetic And Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Using A Web Tool

IntroductionPoor nutritional status, a complex consequence of numerous interrelated factors, is poorly characterized in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before they commence dialysis. This study aimed to characterize the risk factors and prevalence of malnutrition among patients with CKD, with or without diabetes mellitus, before they underwent dialysis at a tertiary care public teaching hospital.MethodsThis longitudinal observational study utilized a Pt-Global web tool© to assess the nutritional status of patients based on their Subjective Global Assessment score as follows: a score of two to three indicates that patient and family education is required; scores of four to eight mean that intervention is required as indicated by symptoms; and a score of nine or more indicates a critical need for intervention. Glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation was used as the measure of kidney function. Multinomial regression analyses were used to ascertain the predictors of poor nutritional status.ResultsA total of 450 patients (265 men and 185 women) who had CKD, with or without diabetes, and were not on dialysis were recruited during the period of study. The average age of the patients was 53.9 years (standard deviation 14.2). ‘Severe’ malnutrition was present in 152 (33.8%) patients, while 140 (31.1%) were ‘mildly or moderately’ malnourished, and 158 (35.1%) were ‘well-nourished’. Patients with CKD and diabetes were more severely malnourished: 68 were rated as mild or moderate (15.1%) and 91 were rated as severe (20.2%). The prevalence of malnutrition increased with the decline of residual renal function. Fatigue, loss of appetite, pain anywhere in the body, constipation, dry mouth, feeling full quickly, and physical and functional inactivity were the most common risk factors for poor nutritional status.ConclusionsThis study presents real-world evidence of poor nutritional status in patients with CKD and confirms that it is more common in individuals who are diabetic and have poor kidney function and hypoalbuminemia. Emphasis on nutrition in patients with CKD is important for improving their health.

MO662: Effects of Blood Contact with Haemodialysis Membrane on the Kidney in a Rat Extracorporeal Perfusion Model

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS A microcirculatory disturbance was found to occur during hemodialysis in an organ such as the brain or heart, which was recently considered to lead to functional impairment of these organs. Decrease in blood volume due to water removal during hemodialysis and the reaction of blood vessels with activated leukocytes and platelets that have come in contact with the dialysis membrane may cause the microcirculatory disturbance of the organs. Residual renal function decline after initiation of hemodialysis is well-known, but the mechanism has not yet been fully understood. In the present study, we focused on the effects of leucocytes and platelets activated by contact with the dialysis membrane and aimed to clarify the effects of blood contact with the dialysis membrane on the kidney. METHOD Male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 397.4 ± 38.6 g were used for the experiment. We compared three experimental groups; the sham group, in which only puncture and infusion of Ringer's lactate solution were performed; the extracorporeal perfusion alone group, in which extracorporeal perfusion was performed only through a blood circuit; and the dialyzer group, in which extracorporeal perfusion was performed through a blood circuit and dialyzer. Blood was withdrawn from the femoral artery and returned to the femoral vein. The blood flow rate was 0.5–1.0 mL/min, the perfusion time was 4-h and no water removal was performed. During the perfusion experiment, arterial pressure and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured and at the end of perfusion, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), a marker of inflammation and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), a marker of kidney injury, were measured. After completing the perfusion experiment, kidneys were removed and morphology was evaluated by a hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Arterial pressure during perfusion showed a significant upward trend during the first 2-h in the extracorporeal alone and dialyzer groups, while SpO2 showed a significant downward trend in these groups. Serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the extracorporeal perfusion alone group (P &amp;lt; .05, n = 8) and the dialyzer group (P &amp;lt; .01, n = 6) than in the sham group (n = 7). Urinary KIM-1 level in the dialyzer group was significantly higher than that in normal rats (P &amp;lt; .01, n = 7). Glomerular congestion was observed in the kidney only in the dialyzer group from the HE staining. There was a significant correlation between the increase in arterial pressure and the decrease in SpO2, suggesting that peripheral circulatory disturbance due to peripheral vasoconstriction occurred in the extracorporeal perfusion alone and the dialyzer groups. In addition, extracorporeal perfusion through the dialyzer caused high levels of IL-6 in serum and KIM-1 in urine, suggesting that systemic inflammatory and kidney injury have occurred. These reactions may contribute to the progression of residual renal dysfunction due to dialysis treatment, especially for the patients after the initiation of hemodialysis. CONCLUSION Extracorporeal perfusion and blood contact with a dialyzer caused systemic inflammation and the microcirculatory disturbance of kidneys, resulting in glomerular congestion and kidney injury in a rat extracorporeal perfusion model.

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Assessment and Management of Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

In developed countries, diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and accounts for 50% of incidence of end stage kidney disease. Despite declining prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications, there are rising trends in renal replacement therapy in diabetes. Optimal glycemic control may reduce risk of progression of CKD and related death. However, assessing glycemic control in patients with advanced CKD and on dialysis (G4-5) can be challenging. Laboratory biomarkers, such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), may be biased by abnormalities in blood haemoglobin, use of iron therapy and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and chronic inflammation due to uraemia. Similarly, glycated albumin and fructosamine may be biased by abnormal protein turnover. Patients with advanced CKD exhibited heterogeneity in glycemic control ranging from severe insulin resistance to ‘burnt-out’ beta-cell function. They also had high risk of hypoglycaemia due to reduced renal gluconeogenesis, frequent use of insulin and dysregulation of counterregulatory hormones. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems measure glucose in interstitial fluid every few minutes and provide an alternative and more reliable method of glycemic assessment, including asymptomatic hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemic excursions. Recent international guidelines recommended use of CGM-derived Glucose Management Index (GMI) in patients with advanced CKD although data are scarce in this population. Using CGM, patients with CKD were found to experience marked glycemic fluctuations with hypoglycemia due to loss of glucose and insulin during haemodialysis (HD) followed by hyperglycemia in the post-HD period. On the other hand, during peritoneal dialysis, patients may experience glycemic excursions with influx of glucose from dialysate solutions. These undesirable glucose exposure and variability may accelerate decline of residual renal function. Although CGM may improve the quality of glycemic monitoring and control in populations with CKD, further studies are needed to confirm the accuracy, optimal mode and frequency of CGM as well as their cost-effectiveness and user-acceptability in patients with advanced CKD and dialysis.

Are USPD patients suitable for incremental peritoneal dialysis: Yes or no?

Incremental peritoneal dialysis (IPD) is the practice of initiating PD exchange less than 4 times a day in consideration of residual renal function (RRF). This study determined whether IPD could be used for urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) patients when starting dialysis, and when compared to full-dose PD, could IPD affect the RRF in USPD patients. 169 USPD patients with eGFR between 4 and 6 mL/min/1.73m2 were retrospectively analyzed. The duration of follow-up was 1 year. Patients were divided into an incremental PD (i-PD) group (dialysis dose ≤ 6,000 mL) and a full-dose PD (f-PD) group (dialysis dose ≥ 8,000 mL). The demographics, clinical indices, peritoneal transport function, dialysis adequacy, and complications of peritoneal dialysis were compared between both groups. (1) 111 patients (average age 45.01 ± 12.84 years) were included in the i-PD group and 58 patients (average age 43.5 ± 15.62 years) in the f-PD group. The demographics and clinical indices of both groups before PD were similar (p < 0.05). (2) During the follow-up period, the dialysis dose in the f-PD group exceeded that of the i-PD group (p < 0.05). The dialysis adequacy of both groups was as expected. (3) During the follow-up period, peritoneal transport function, the RRF, the blood pressure control, correction of anemia, and correction of calcium and phosphorus abnormalities were similar in both groups. (4) The peritoneal dialysis-related infection, mechanical complications, and technical survival rate were similar between groups. Incremental PD did not cause a rapid decline of RRF in USPD patients. The dialysis effect and complications from it, were similar to full-dose peritoneal dialysis. Thus, USPD patients can be treated by IPD.

Efficacy of Roxadustat on anemia and residual renal function in patients new to peritoneal dialysis

Background Both early correction of anemia and preserving residual renal function (RRF) are reported to improve patient survival. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of Roxadustat for treatment of renal anemia in patients new to peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to assess its impact on RRF. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 initial peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with renal anemia. Twenty-eight cases were treated with Roxadustat (Roxadustat group) and 32 with recombinant human erythropoietin (control group). Clinical characteristics, hemoglobin (Hb), C-reactive protein, blood lipids, iron metabolism, dialysis adequacy and RRF of the two groups were evaluated and adverse events were recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 40 weeks. Results After 40 weeks of treatment, mean Hb levels were significantly higher from baseline values in both groups, the mean Hb change in Roxadustat group was higher than control group (3.46 ± 1.59 g/dL vs. 2.28 ± 2.27 g/dL, p < 0.05). At 40 weeks, 92.9% patients met the target level of Hb in Roxadustat group and 84.4% in control group. Total iron binding was higher and ferritin was lower in Roxadustat group from baseline values and Roxadustat-induced Hb increases were independent of baseline C-reactive protein levels and history of rhuEPO administration. RRF decreased over time in both groups, the mean RRF change was lower in Roxadustat group than control group (1.15 ± 1.66 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 2.31 ± 1.46 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.01). Compared with control group, patients in Roxadustat group had higher levels of total iron binding, 24 h urine volume, total weekly Ccr, and lower systolic pressure, ferritin, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol, LDL. No serious adverse reactions occurred in either group. Conclusion In patients new to PD, Roxadustat effectively and safely improved renal anemia and delay the decline of RRF.

The Association of Interdialytic Weight Gain in Long Intervals with Residual Renal Function Decline

The Association of Interdialytic Weight Gain in Long Intervals with Residual Renal Function Decline

High-Salt Diet Accelerated the Decline of Residual Renal Function in Patients With Peritoneal Dialysis

Objective: This study aims to investigate the relationship between dietary salt intake and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.Methods: The daily salt intake of the patients was calculated based on a 3 day dietary record. Sixty-two patients were divided into three groups: 33 patients in the low salt intake group (salt intake <6.0 g/day), 17 in the medium salt intake group (salt intake 6.0 to <8.0 g/day), and 12 in the high salt intake group (salt intake ≥8.0 g/day). Regular follow-up was conducted every 3 months. Urine volume, peritoneal ultrafiltration volume, and other clinical indicators were recorded. Biochemical indexes were detected to evaluate the changes in residual renal function and peritoneal function during follow-up.Results: A positive correlation between dietary sodium intake and sodium excretion was found. During 12-month follow-up, a decrease of residual renal function showed a significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.041) (15.3 ± 27.5 vs. 12.5 ± 11.5 vs. 32.9 ± 18.4 L/W/1.73 m2 in the low-, medium-, and high salt intake groups, respectively). Consistently, a higher decline of residual renal function (adjusted β, 20.37; 95% CI, 2.83, 37.91) was found in participants with high salt intake (salt intake ≥8 g/day) compared with those in non-high salt intake.Conclusion: Our study showed that the sodium excretion by peritoneal dialysis was positively correlated with dietary sodium intake in PD patients. The high salt intake diet (salt intake ≥8 g/day) may lead to a faster decline of residual renal function in PD patients.

Association of Urinary Dickkopf-3 with Residual Renal Function Decline in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis.

Background and Objectives: Urinary levels of dickkopf-3 (DKK-3) are associated with poor renal survival in patients with non-dialytic chronic kidney disease. However, it remains unknown whether urinary DKK-3 levels can predict residual renal function (RRF) decline in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Therefore, we investigated the correlation between urinary levels of DKK-3 and the subsequent rate of RRF decline in PD patients. Materials and Methods: This study included 36 PD patients who underwent multiple peritoneal equivalent tests during 2011–2021. The relationship between baseline clinical characteristics and the subsequent annual rate of Kt/V decline was investigated. Results: The annual rate of renal Kt/V decline was 0.29 (range: 0.05–0.48), which correlated with renal Kt/V (r = 0.55, p = 0.0005) and 24 h urinary DKK-3 excretion (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001). Similarly, 24 h urinary DKK-3 excretion (β = 0.44, p = 0.0015) and renal Kt/V (β = 0.38, p = 0.0059) were independently associated with the annual rate of renal Kt/V decline in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Urinary DKK-3 assessment may help identify PD patients at a high risk of RRF decline.

Red blood cell distribution width predicts residual renal function decline in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

To investigate the relationship between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and residual renal function (RRF) in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Seventy-seven CAPD patients were enrolled in this study. According to receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, patients were divided into high RDW (RDW > 14.95%) and low RDW (RDW ≤ 14.95%) groups. The data of baseline clinical, biochemical parameters, comorbidities, medication status, peritoneal function, and dialysis adequacy were compared. Survival curves were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was employed to analyze risk factors of decline in RRF. The overall median survival time was 24 months, the median survival time of high RDW group (46 patients) and low RDW group (31 patients) were 24 and 12 months, respectively. Compared with the low RDW group, patients in the high RDW group were older, higher rate of decline RRF and white blood cells count as well as lower total Kt/V (all p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the low RDW group had higher survival of RRF compared with the high RDW group (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high RDW was independent risk factor for decline of RRF(hazard ratio=1.441, 95% confidence interval: 1.089-1.905, p=0.01). Increased baseline RDW is associated with decline of RRF in CAPD patients and RDW can be stratified as a valuable indicator for the risk of RRF decline.

Effect of salt intake on residual renal function in rats receiving peritoneal dialysis

To assess the effect of salt intake on residual renal function in rats and explore the possible mechanism. SD rats were 5/6-nephrectomized to induce chronic renal failure followed by peritoneal dialysis for 4 weeks (n=18) or without dialysis treatment (control group; n=18). In both groups, the rats were divided into 3 subgroups and were given lowsalt diet (0.02% NaCl), normal salt diet (0.4% NaCl), and high-salt diet (4% NaCl). After 8 and 12weeks, blood pressure and creatinine and sodium levels in the blood, urine, and peritoneal dialysate of the rats were examined. Glomerular sclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and protein expression levels of RAS components (ACE-1, AGT, and AT-1) in renal cortical tissue of the rats were evaluated. The residual renal function of the rats all decreased especially in rats with high salt intake for 8and 12 weeks. In peritoneal dialysis group, the rats with high-salt diet showed signficiantly increased renal interstitial fibrosis score (P=0.036), glomerular sclerosis index (P=0.045), systolic blood pressure (P=0.004), diastolic blood pressure (P=0.048), and renal expressions of AGT, ACE-1, and AT1 (P < 0.05) as compared with those with normal salt intake. In the rats fed the same high-salt diet, the renal interstitial fibrosis score, glomerular sclerosis index, diastolic blood pressure increase, and renal AGT and ACE-1 expression levels were significantly lower in the peritoneal dialysis group than in the control group (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was noted between the reduction of residual renal function and sodium intake in the rats. In rats with chronic renal failure, high salt intake promotes the activation of the renal RAS system, increases blood pressure, and agrevates renal fibrosis to accelerate the decline of residual renal function, and peritoneal dialysis partially reduces the damage of residual renal function induced by high-salt diets by removing excessive sodium.

Urinary Liver-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Predicts Residual Renal Function Decline in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

BackgroundLiver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) is a predictive marker for the early detection of acute kidney injury; however, less is known about how useful it is for predicting residual renal function (RRF) decline in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD).Material/MethodsThe study subjects were 35 patients on PD who underwent multiple peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) between October 2011 and October 2019. Urinary L-FABP levels were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The relationship between baseline clinical data, including urinary L-FABP levels and the subsequent annual rate of renal Kt/V decline, was investigated.ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 11 months and the rate of renal Kt/V decline was 0.29/y. Compared with outcomes in the group with renal Kt/V preservation, renal Kt/V decline was associated with both high daily levels of urinary protein excretion (0.60 g/d [range, 0.50–0.87] vs. 0.36 g/d [range, 0.19–0.48]; P=0.01) and high daily levels of urinary L-FABP excretion (111.2 mg/d [range, 76.1–188.6] vs. 61.5 mg/d [range, 35.7–96.0]; P=0.002). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only high daily levels of urinary L-FABP excretion were independently associated with renal Kt/V decline (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.05; P=0.001). Furthermore, higher daily levels of urinary L-FABP excretion were significantly correlated with the higher annual rate of renal Kt/V decline (r=0.71, P<0.001).ConclusionsWe demonstrated that daily levels of urinary L-FABP are associated with RRF decline in patients on PD. The results of the present study indicate that assessment of urinary L-FABP levels may help predict RRF decline in patients on PD.

APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all.

The use of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) in its various forms has increased over the past few years mainly in developed countries. This could be attributed to improved cycler design, apparent lifestyle benefits and the ability to achieve adequacy and ultrafiltration targets. However, the dilemma of choosing the superior modality between APD and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) has not yet been resolved. When it comes to fast transporters and assisted PD, APD is certainly considered the most suitable Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) modality. Improved patients’ compliance, lower intraperitoneal pressure and possibly lower incidence of peritonitis have been also associated with APD. However, concerns regarding increased cost, a more rapid decline in residual renal function, inadequate sodium removal and disturbed sleep are APD’s setbacks. Besides APD superiority over CAPD in fast transporters, the other medical advantages of APD still remain controversial. In any case, APD should be readily available for all patients starting PD and the most important indication for its implementation remains patient’s choice.

Effects of ACEIs and ARBs on the Residual Renal Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background In peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) could protect residual renal function is still controversial. To assess the effects of ACEIs and ARBs on the residual renal function and cardiovascular (CV) events in peritoneal dialysis patients, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Materials and Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the CNKI database, and the Wanfang database for relevant articles from database inception to November 30, 2019. Randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was the decline in the residual renal function (RRF). Results Thirteen trials with 625 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The average residual GFR declined by 1.79 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ACEI/ARB group versus 1.44 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the placebo or active control group at 3 mo. The average residual GFR declined by 2.02 versus 2.06, 2.16 versus 2.72, and -0.04 versus 2.74 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the placebo or active control group at 6 months (mo), 12 mo, and 24 mo, respectively. The decline in residual GFR showed a significant difference between the ACEI/ARB group and the placebo or active control group at 12 mo (MD = −0.64 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI: -0.97~-0.32; I2 = 44%; P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in Kt/V, urinary protein excretion, weekly creatinine clearance, CV events, or serum potassium levels. Conclusions In the present study, we found that the use of ACEIs and ARBs, especially long-term treatment, decreased the decline of RRF in patients on PD. ACEIs and ARBs do not cause an additional risk of side effects.

P1135WHETHER USPD PATIENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR INCREMENTAL PERITONEAL DIALYSIS:YES OR NO?

Abstract Background and Aims Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis (IPD) is the practice of initiating PD exchange less than four times a day in consideration of residual renal function (RRF). More clinical studies have confirmed the feasibility and effectiveness of IPD, especially in the protection of residual renal function, which is obviously superior to full-dose PD. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is a popular PD method. Due to lack of pre-dialysis education, most of patients who were newly diagnosed with ESRD in China chose USPD. Well, can incremental peritoneal dialysis be used for USPD patients when starting dialysis? Compared to full-dose PD, whether incremental PD affects the residual renal function in USPD patients? Here we report the first study of incremental peritoneal dialysis’s effect on residual renal function. Method A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 169 patients who received USPD from August 2008 to March 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to dialysis dose: incremental PD(i-PD) group (dialysis dose were less than or equal to 6000ml or 3 exchanges per day) and full-dose PD(f-PD) group (dialysis dose were great than or equal to 8000ml or 4 exchanges per day). The demographics, clinical biochemical indexes, dialysis dose, urine volume, dialysis ultrafiltration volume, RRF, dialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis infection complications, mechanical complications and survival rates were compared between two groups in 1 year follow-up. Results: (1).A total of 169 patients were enrolled, including 111 patients (average age 45.01±12.84 years) in i-PD group and 58 patients (average age 43.5±15.62 years) in f-PD group. The demographics and clinical biochemical indexes in the two groups before peritoneal dialysis were similar (P&amp;gt;0.05). (2).During the follow-up period, the dialysis dose in f-PD group(8034.48±262.61ml/d, 8080.00±395.80ml/d, 8155.17±523.21ml/d, 8051.72±906.55ml/d) were more than those in i-PD group(5891.89±528.31ml/d, 6159.57±1185.06ml/d, 6468.47±1588.71ml/d, 6900.90±1543.05ml/d), P&amp;lt;0.05. And the dialysis adequacy in both groups were up to standard: the total Kt/V (i-PD group: 1.96±0.56, 2.01±0.70, 2.02±0.55, 1.90±0.52; f-PD group: 2.18±0.47, 2.22±0.55, 2.05±0.44, 2.03±0.42) were greater than 1.7 and the total Ccr (i-PD group: 79.39±29.75, 79.02±25.11, 78.26±30.00, 73.09±29.14; f-PD group: 89.78±29.89, 91.54±35.56, 82.38±29.27, 72.96±23.75) were greater than 60L. (3).During the whole follow-up period, the residual renal function between two groups had no statistically significant(i-PD group: 3.96±2.52ml/min, 3.46±1.95ml/min, 3.58±2.85ml/min, 2.91±2.33ml/min; f-PD group: 4.31±4.83ml/min, 3.45±2.36ml/min, 3.16±2.15ml/min, 2.36±1.65ml/min), P&amp;gt;0.05. (4).During the whole follow-up period, the blood pressure control, correction of anemia, and correction of calcium and phosphorus abnormalities were also similar in both groups, P&amp;gt;0.05. (5).At 1-month and 6-month, the urine volume were higher in i-PD group(1024.33±492.91ml/d, 1017.03±571.66ml/d) than those in f-PD group(782.93±415.89ml/d, 788.27±491.02ml/d), P&amp;lt;0.05. The dialysis ultrafiltration volume in f-PD group (481.67±723.69ml/d, 632.77±687.89ml/d, 338.87±963.14ml/d, 750.43±849.69ml/d) were higher than those in i-PD group(343.30±520.00ml/d, 495.70±916.76ml/d, 341.78±925.57ml/d, 439.65±1297.13ml/d) during the whole follow-up period, but the differences were not statistically significant (P&amp;gt;0.05). (6).The exit-site infection, peritonitis, mechanical complications and technical survival were similar between the two groups (P&amp;gt;0.05). Conclusion Incremental peritoneal dialysis will not cause rapid decline of residual renal function in USPD patients, and the dialysis effect and complications are similar to full-dose peritoneal dialysis. Therefore, we recommend that USPD patients can be treated by incremental peritoneal dialysis.

Diuretics in chronic kidney disease

The issues of diuretic therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease, pharmacokinetics of diuretics, the problem of diuretic resistance, the tactics of using thiazides and loop diuretics in patients with various stages of chronic kidney disease, according to the recommendations of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative are discussed in the article. Particular attention is paid to the prescription of this group of drugs to patients with end stage renal disease, as well as those undergoing renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis).Diuretics play an important role in the management of patients with chronic kidney disease with the development of hypertension and an increased extracellular fluid volume. In case of impaired renal function leading place is given to loop diuretics. Their combination with thiazide diuretics can increase the diuretic effect. The results of clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of the use of diuretics during decline of residual renal function are provided. It is reported about the effect of potassium-sparing diuretics on the incidence of cardiovascular complications, the development of hyperkalemia in patients undergoing dialysis treatment. The importance of continuation of intensive study about the possibility of antagonists of mineralocorticoid receptors usage, in particular the spironolactone, eplerenone, and finerenone in order to reduce cardiovascular complications and mortality, is indicated.

Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Blockades Does Not Protect Residual Renal Function in Patients with Hemodialysis at 1 Year After Dialysis Initiation: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

The beneficial effects of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on residual renal function (RRF) in patients who have just initiated hemodialysis (HD) have been inconclusive. In this study, 935 patients with incident HD from a nationwide prospective observational cohort in Korea were included for analysis. The primary outcome showed that RRF as demonstrated by urine volume changes over 0, 3, and 12 months differed between the RAAS blockade and control groups. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to compare RRF between the groups. Patients in the RAAS group had a greater proportion of higher urine volume at study enrollment compared to the control group, but there was no difference in baseline characteristics, heart function, and dialysis-related indices. After adjusting for confounding factors, the RAAS group did not provide a significant benefit to RRF in a mixed-effects linear regression (p = 0.51). Male gender, high Charlson comorbidity index, diuretic use, and high weekly ultrafiltration volume were associated with faster decline in RRF. The RAAS group failed to provide a protective effect for the development of anuria 1 year after initiating dialysis based on the multivariate logistic regression (OR 0.73 95% CI 0.25–2.13, p = 0.57). In Korean patients with incident HD, RAAS blockade did not provide a protective effect for RRF after 1 year. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal treatment for preserving RRF in HD patients.