Decline In Prostate-specific Antigen Levels Research Articles

Ipilimumab with nivolumab in molecularly selected patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: primary analysis of the phase II INSPIRE trial

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) typically exhibits resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, a subset of mCRPC patients displays a more immunogenic profile. This study examines efficacy and safety of dual ICI therapy in molecularly selected mCRPC. This single-arm, phase II trial included 69 molecularly selected mCRPC patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), non-synonymous tumour mutational burden ≥7.1 muts/Mb (hTMB), a BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm), or biallelic CDK12 inactivation (CDK12i). Efficacy was assessed in ICI-naïve patients (cohort A) with RECIST 1.1 (A1) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (A2) measurable disease. Safety was evaluated in cohorts A and B (prior ICI monotherapy). Treatment included nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was disease control rate beyond 6 months (DCR > 6), aiming to surpass a DCR > 6 of 22%. Patients initiated treatment between January 2021 and February 2024. Cohort A included 65 patients. Of these, 21 had dMMR (32%), 8 had hTMB (12%), 20 had BRCAm (31%), and 16 had CDK12i (25%). DCR > 6 was achieved in 38% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27% to 51%], and was highest in dMMR (81%), followed by hTMB (25%), CDK12i (19%), and BRCAm (15%). Objective response rate in cohort A was 38% (95% CI 22% to 55%) and 47% (95% CI 34% to 60%) exhibited a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.5-12.0 months) in cohort A, and 32.7 months (95% CI 21.8 months-not reached) in dMMR patients. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) led to permanent discontinuation in 14 of 69 patients (20%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 48% of patients, with diarrhoea and elevated transaminases each in 10%. There was one treatment-related death due to a bowel perforation and a second following euthanasia after grade 4 toxicity. This trial of dual ICIs in molecularly selected mCRPC met its primary endpoint, showing DCR > 6 in 38% of patients. Dual ICIs exhibited modest responses in the hTMB, BRCAm, and CDK12i subgroups, but demonstrated exceptional efficacy in dMMR.

Study of prostate-specific antigen levels during salvage radiotherapy after prostate cancer surgery

BackgroundAdministration of adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy (RT) after prostate cancer (PCa) surgery is supported by clinical evidence and is a widely adopted strategy. On occasion, we detect changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, such as a transient elevation or decline, during RT. Thus, we retrospectively investigated the frequency of changes in PSA levels, their associations with histopathological parameters, PSA doubling time (PSADT), and biochemical recurrence (BR) of PCa.MethodsThis study included 23 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for PCa between 2012 and 2019, received salvage RT without hormone therapy, and exhibited changes in PSA levels during RT. The prostatic bed was irradiated with a total dose of 64 to 66 Gy. BR was defined as consecutive PSA levels exceeding 0.2 ng/mL or having to start hormone therapy because of PSA elevation after salvage RT.ResultsDuring salvage RT after PCa surgery, PSA levels transiently increased in 11 patients (47.8%) and decreased in 12 (52.2%). When factors associated with BR were examined in patients with transient PSA elevation, seminal vesicle invasion and preoperative PSA values were identified as being statistically significant. When factors for BR were examined in patients with a decline in PSA levels, the Gleason score and PSADT were identified as being significant. Among the cases of a decline in PSA levels during salvage RT, those who received a radiation dose of less than 36 Gy did not experience BR. Similarly, patients who exhibited changes in PSA levels during salvage RT and did not have perineural invasion did not experience BR.ConclusionThis is the first study to examine the histopathological factors possibly affecting BR in patients undergoing salvage RT after PCa surgery. The results indicate that in patients with transient PSA elevation, seminal vesicle invasion is a significant risk factor. On the other hand, in patients with a decline in PSA levels during irradiation, the Gleason score and perineural invasion were found to be potential risk factors for BR. These findings suggest that a thorough examination of postoperative histopathological results may be necessary for the optimal management of patients with PCa.

Plain language summary: Can declines in prostate-specific antigen level indicate how long patients with advanced prostate cancer will live when treated with enzalutamide?

This is a summary of a research article originally published in the Journal of Urology. The PROSPER study involved men who had a type of advanced prostate cancer called non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In patients with nmCRPC, their prostate cancer keeps growing even after traditional hormone treatments. In these patients, rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels suggest that cancer is active but CT and bone scans show that it has not spread to other parts of the body. Everyone in this study received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) either with the medicine enzalutamide or a placebo. Enzalutamide is a medicine that can slow or stop androgens, such as testosterone, from making prostate cancer grow. The main results of the PROSPER study showed that patients with nmCRPC treated with enzalutamide and ADT lived longer than patients treated with placebo and ADT. In this study, researchers wanted to know if the findings were different depending on how much patients' PSA level declined after enzalutamide treatment. Researchers also wanted to know if this made a difference in how long patients lived without the cancer spreading to other parts of their body. Researchers found that patients with a large decline in PSA level after treatment were more likely to live longer and without their cancer spreading. This study shows a link between PSA level changes and how long patients with nmCRPC live when treated with enzalutamide and ADT. These results may help health professionals monitor patients with different PSA level changes after enzalutamide treatment. Patients with a large decline in PSA level may not need to be monitored as closely as patients with a small decline in PSA level.

A territory-wide real-world efficacy and toxicity analysis of abiraterone acetate versus docetaxel in 574 Asian patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

IntroductionAbiraterone acetate (ABI) or docetaxel (DOC), in addition to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), are current treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). No randomized head-to-head trial has compared these 2 mHSPC treatments, and real-world data regarding their outcomes in Asian patients are lacking. Patients and MethodsThe medical records of mHSPC patients who began upfront ABI or DOC treatment in addition to ADT at seven public oncology centers in Hong Kong between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and toxicities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. ResultsA total of 574 patients were included, of whom 419 received DOC and 155 received ABI. The median follow-up duration was 22.4 (DOC group: 23.8; ABI group: 17.3) months. The ABI group demonstrated significantly better PFS than the DOC group (not reached vs. 15.1 months: hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.28-0.50; P < .001). No significant OS difference was observed (P = .58). Failure to achieve a ≥ 90% decline in PSA level at 3 months and failure to achieve an undetectable PSA nadir were each associated with unfavorable PFS and OS. Patients who received DOC had a higher rate of febrile neutropenia, whereas those who received ABI had higher rates of grade ≥ 3 hypokalemia and elevated alanine transaminase. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicities was more common in the DOC (3.6%) than the ABI (0.6%) group. ConclusionIn Asian mHSPC patients, upfront ABI + ADT was associated with better PFS than DOC + ADT, with no significant OS difference. PSA kinetics may help stratify the prognosis for treatment intensification. Toxicity profiles were different, with a higher rate of toxicity-related treatment discontinuation in the DOC group.

Immediate Prostate-specific Antigen Decline After Enzalutamide Following Abiraterone Predicts Survival in Castration-resistant Disease.

Although the sequential use of abiraterone and enzalutamide is not recommended because of possible cross-resistance, many patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are receiving sequential abiraterone and enzalutamide in the real world, and a subset of patients can benefit from sequential therapy with these drugs. This study aimed to identify patients who could benefit from the sequential use of enzalutamide after abiraterone use. We included 70 patients with mCRPC who received enzalutamide sequentially following abiraterone treatment. Decline in the prostatespecific antigen (PSA) levels at 4 weeks after enzalutamide initiation and the association between decline in PSA levels and survival were analyzed. Sixteen men (22.9%) achieved a decline of >50% in PSA levels after 4 weeks of enzalutamide administration. Overall survival (OS) after enzalutamide among men with >50% decline at 4 weeks was significantly better than that among men with a PSA decline <50% (not reached vs. 34 months, p=0.008). OS after first-line abiraterone treatment for men with PSA decline >50% and <50% was not reached and 46 months, respectively (p=0.007). A PSA decline of >50% at 4 weeks of enzalutamide administration was an independent predictor of longer OS. A PSA decline of >50% at 4 weeks after the start of sequential enzalutamide treatment following abiraterone treatment predicted long-term survival in patients with mCRPC. Early PSA decline can identify patients who benefit from second-line enzalutamide after abiraterone treatment and can be useful as a decision-making tool regarding treatment.

Current Status of Monoclonal Antibodies-Based Therapies in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

BackgroundMultiple patients with prostate cancer become resistant to castration therapies, which is termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).PurposeThe purpose of this review is to assess the status of efficacy (≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)) and safety (grade 3-4 adverse effects) of monoclonal antibodies in CRPC.Data sourceWe searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov.ResultsHazard ratios of PFS and OS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69-0.87, I2 = 53%) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.86-1.11, I2 = 40%), respectively, in the favor of monoclonal antibodies as compared to placebo. Risk ratio (RR) of >50% decline in PSA was 1.99 (95% CI = 0.97-4.08, I2 = 53%) in favor of monoclonal antibodies. Pooled incidence of >50% decline in PSA levels was 15% (95% CI = 0.1-0.23, I2 = 83%), 29% (95% CI = 0.14-0.51, I2 = 93%), 63% (95% CI = 0.49-0.76, I2 = 77%), and 88% (95% CI = 0.81-0.93, I2 = 0%) in single, two, three, and four-drug regimens, respectively.ConclusionMonoclonal antibodies are well tolerated and showed better PFS as compared to placebo. However, OS was only improved with ipilimumab. Denosumab delayed skeletal-related adverse events as compared to zoledronic acid. More multicenter double-blind clinical trials may be needed to confirm these results.

Biweekly DoceAqualip in mCRPC patients beyond 20 cycles: A case series

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles is an accepted standard regimen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report our experience with >20 cycles of biweekly nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) treatment in patients with mCRPC. Cases with long-term treatment of NDLS treatment in mCRPC patients were identified from the medical records of Jawaharlal Nehru Cancer Hospital & Research Centre Bhopal, India. A total of three cases with >20 cycles of NDLS are presented here. Overall, the 3 patients received biweekly NDLS at a dose of 45 mg/m2 for 22, 36, and 40 cycles, respectively, except for one patient where NDLS was initiated at 50 mg/m2 and later reduced to 45 mg/m2. All the 3 patients reported prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% decline in PSA levels from baseline). The time to treatment failure (TTF) was 14.8, 18.2, and 20.6 months in these 3 patients, respectively. PSA nadir occurred after 14, 6 and 13 cycles, respectively. The OS was 21.6, 22.2 and 25.8 months, respectively. Anemia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. NDLS treatment was overall well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. Biweekly NDLS for >20 cycles was effective and well-tolerated in patients with mCRPC. NDLS can potentially be used for long-term management, which may be a requirement for most patients with mCRPC.

Evaluación del papel de la PET/TC con [68Ga]Ga-PSMA I&T en la evaluación de la respuesta a la terapia con docetaxel en pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración

ObjectiveThere have been only few studies investigating the role of PSMA ligands in the therapy response assessment of metastasized castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cases. In this study we aimed at evaluating the capability of 68Ga- prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) I&T positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in the assessment of therapeutic response in patients under docetaxel therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). Material and methodsThe clinical records of all mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel and referred to our department for 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging were retrospectively analysed. Sixteen patients (mean age 69 years, range 52–82 years) with castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving palliative docetaxel therapy and had undergone 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT scan were included in the study. 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging was done and prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured at baseline before administration of docetaxel (PET1) and after at least 3 cycles (range 4–12) of chemotherapy (PET2). Patient-based as well as lesion-based comparison of PET2 findings with PET1 findings were done. ResultsThe change (decrease) observed in lymph node and prostate gland/prostatic bed SUVmax values after treatment compared to pretreatment was found to be statistically significant (P=.033).3/16 patients (19%) were classified as progressive disease (PD), 4/16 (25%) as stable disease (SD), 9/16 (56%) as partial remission (PR) radiologically. An increasing PSA trend (IT) was observed in 4 patients (25%) and a decreasing PSA trend (DT) in 3 patients (18%). Nine patients showed a PSA response of ≥ 50% (56%). Of the 4 patients showing SD, 3 had IT, 3 had BR. Of the 9 patients who showed PR on PET studies, 8 patients showed BR and 1 patient showed DT. ConclusionImaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed great concordance with biochemical response evaluation in terms of PSA levels, especially in patients showing good response to therapy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was also successful in identifying progressive disease in patients showing paradoxical decline in PSA levels.

Assessment of the role of Ga-68 PSMA I&T PET/CT in response evaluation to docetaxel therapy in castration resistant prostate cancer patients

ObjectiveThere have been only few studies investigating the role of PSMA ligands in the therapy response assessment of metastasized castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cases. In this study we aimed at evaluating the capability of 68Ga- prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) -I&T positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in the assessment of therapeutic response in patients under docetaxel therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). Material and methodsThe clinical records of all mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel and referred to our department for 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging were retrospectively analysed. Sixteen patients (mean age 69 years, range 52–82 years) with castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving palliative docetaxel therapy and had undergone 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT scan were included in the study. 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging was done and prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured at baseline before administration of docetaxel (PET1) and after at least 3 cycles (range 4–12) of chemotherapy (PET2). Patient-based as well as lesion-based comparison of PET2 findings with PET1 findings were done. ResultsThe change (decrease) observed in lymph node and prostate gland/prostatic bed SUVmax values after treatment compared to pretreatment was found to be statistically significant (p=0.033).3/16 patients (19%) were classified as progressive disease (PD), 4/16 (25%) as stable disease (SD), 9/16 (56%) as partial remission (PR) radiologically. An increasing PSA trend (IT) was observed in 4 patients (25%) and a decreasing PSA trend (DT) in 3 patients (18%). Nine patients showed a PSA response of ≥50% (56%). Of the 4 patients showing SD, 3 had IT, 3 had BR. Of the 9 patients who showed PR on PET studies, 8 patients showed BR and 1 patient showed DT. ConclusionImaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed great concordance with biochemical response evaluation in terms of PSA levels, especially in patients showing good response to therapy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was also successful in identifying progressive disease in patients showing paradoxical decline in PSA levels.

The value of prostate-specific antigen monitoring during salvage radiotherapy: a retrospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis

Use of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after cancer surgery has a low disease control rate. Low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the blood pre-SRT seem to be the best predictor of success. Our study used PSA monitoring during and after treatment to investigate if PSA levels during SRT can give further information about its chances of success. In a retrospective cohort of 78 patients submitted to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical relapse after cancer surgery, we assess PSA values at start of the treatment, 1 week before the end of treatment, and every 3 months for at least 2 years. Post-treatment PSA in our series and the systematic review of the literature aimed to investigate the prognostic value of PSA variation for biochemical disease-free survival. The results suggest that a decline in PSA levels after at least 45 Gy of radiation therapy dosage or a decrease of at least 0.2 ng/mL compared with the start value may be a favorable prognostic factors for biochemical disease-free survival. These results need confirmation using prospective data before being applied to clinical practice and could help physician to choose the correct therapeutic strategy.

Prognostic importance of prostatic specific antigen response in patients who received Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen treatment for castration resistant prostate cancer.

This study aims to analyze the prognostic importance of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) response in patients who received radioligand therapy (RLT) with Lu-177 Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for their castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thirty consecutive patients who received Lu-177 PSMA treatment for their castration-resistant prostate carcinoma were included. All the patients had undergone Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scanning before Lu-177 PSMA therapy, which revealed multiple metastases. Patients were treated with a fixed dose (180 mCi) of Lu-177 PSMA at six to eight weeks intervals. PSA response was evaluated using Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Serum PSA response was classified as PSA progression (25% increase over the baseline and an increase in the absolute-value PSA level by at least 5 ng per millilitre), any <50% decline or ≥50% decline. PSA response was evaluated six weeks after every cycle. Response evaluation with radiological imaging and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT were performed before the first cycle and eight weeks after the last cycle. Thirty patients were treated with a total of 171 cycles (median 4, range 3-7) of Lu-177 PSMA. A decline in serum PSA of ≥50% was detected in ten patients (33%) while a decline in PSA of any amount was observed in fifteen (50%) patients after the first cycle. After the last cycle, a decline in PSA ≥50% and of any amount was seen in thirteen (43%) and fourteen (46%) patients, respectively. Of the fifteen patients who were not responder after the first cycle, three (20%) had a decline in PSA of any amount after the completion of the RLT. Moreover, of the 20 patients who did not have a ≥50% decline in PSA level after the first cycle, four (20%) became responder after the last cycle. Regarding serum PSA response after the first cycle, median OS was significantly higher for patients who had ≥50% decline in PSA level with 21.0±10.0 (95% CI: 1.2-40.7) months compared to patients who had not with 8.0±2.6 (95% CI: 2.7-13.2) months (P=0.012). A decline in PSA of any amount after the first cycle did not have a significant impact on median OS (12.0±1.1 vs. 6.0±2.5 months, P=0.08). The decline in serum PSA level after the last cycle of treatment had a significant impact on OS. Median OS for the decline in PSA of any amount was calculated as 13.0±1.0 (95% CI: 10.9-15.0) months for responders and 6.0±1.9 (95% CI: 2.2-9.7) months for non-responders (P=0.016). Considering ≥50% of decline as a response, median OS was 21.0±5.8 (95% CI: 9.5-32.4) months for responders and 6.0±3.0 (95% CI: 0.1-11.8) months for non-responders (P=0.026). Serum PSA level during RLT with Lu-177 PSMA remains a clinically significant factor to predict OS times. About twenty percent of patients who were not responder after the first cycle could become responder after the last cycle. However, patients without PSA response after completion of all cycles should be closely followed-up. Non-responder patients can achieve a response with further treatments.

Early Dutasteride Monotherapy in Patients With Elevated Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of early dutasteride administration in patients with a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed RARP patients whose pathological stage is T2a to T3b without lymph node or distant metastasis from 2007 to 2017. All patients received a daily dose of 0.5 mg of dutasteride when post-RARP PSA levels were increasing but had not achieved biochemical recurrence. PSA levels were monitored every 3 months after dutasteride administration. None of the patients received radiotherapy (RT) or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before taking dutasteride. All follow-ups were begun from RARP to January 2019 or to the date of RT/ADT.Results: Thirty-five patients were included in this analysis. The median followed up was 53.6 months. Twenty-two patients (62.9%) showed a PSA response in which the PSA decreased more than 10% at the first follow-up after dutasteride administration. The Pathological stage > T2 (p = 0.012) and positive surgical margin (p = 0.046) were prognostic factors for a PSA response. Twenty-three out of 35 included patients (65.7%) did not require further RT/ADT. The significant risk factor was the PSA level (p = 0.011) at the beginning of dutasteride treatment. The cut-off value of the PSA level to avoid further RT/ADT was 0.195 ng/ml.Conclusions: Early dutasteride administration showed a significant decline in the PSA levels of patients with pathology stage >T2 and positive surgical margin in our retrospective hypothesis-generating study. If dutasteride was provided before the PSA value increased to 0.195 ng/ml after RARP, it would reduce the probability of acquirement of RT/ADT.

Lu177‐PSMA therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer: Initial 18 months experience at a single Australian tertiary institution

Lutetium-177-PSMA (LuPSMA) is a targeted systemic radioligand treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). LuPSMA is considered as an experimental treatment not yet used in routine practice. Here, we report our experience following the introduction of LuPSMA therapy at our institution. Referred mCRPC patients were assessed for treatment suitability including Gallium-68-PSMA PET/CT and blood tests. Suitable patients underwent up to four cycles of LuPSMA treatment. Response to treatment was assessed by changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Toxicity was assessed by recording of adverse events. In an 18month period, 50 patients underwent 132 cycles of LuPSMA therapy. Patients underwent a median of three cycles each (range: 1-4) and the mean administered amount of activity per cycle was 5.9 GBq (range: 3.5-8.2 GBq). PSA decline could be calculated for 49 patients, with a best PSA decline of≥50% observed in 22 patients (44.9%). Adverse events were reported across 45 of 132 LuPSMA cycles. Most adverse events were grade I (42/45) and the remaining three events were grade II. Initial experience at our site supports the use of LuPSMA as an emerging safe and effective treatment for mCRPC. Since introducing LuPSMA therapy at our institution, 44.9% of patients have experienced a decline in PSA level≥50% with low or minimal toxicity. This is an important finding as these patients had previously exhausted all available treatment options. Overall, we have found patients and their primary care doctors have eagerly accepted LuPSMA as another line of defence against mCRPC.

Analysis of the Prevalence of Microsatellite Instability in Prostate Cancer and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

The anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) solid tumors, but the prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer and the clinical utility of immune checkpoint blockade in this disease subset are unknown. To define the prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer and the clinical benefit of anti-PD-1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy in this molecularly defined population. In this case series, 1551 tumors from 1346 patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were prospectively analyzed using a targeted sequencing assay from January 1, 2015, through January 31, 2018. Patients had a diagnosis of prostate cancer and consented to tumor molecular profiling when a tumor biopsy was planned or archival tissue was available. For each patient, clinical outcomes were reported, with follow-up until May 31, 2018. Tumor mutation burden and MSIsensor score, a quantitative measure of MSI, were calculated. Mutational signature analysis and immunohistochemistry for MMR protein expression were performed in select cases. Among the 1033 patients who had adequate tumor quality for MSIsensor analysis (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [9.3] years), 32 (3.1%) had MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer. Twenty-three of 1033 patients (2.2%) had tumors with high MSIsensor scores, and an additional 9 had indeterminate scores with evidence of dMMR. Seven of the 32 MSI-H/dMMR patients (21.9%) had a pathogenic germline mutation in a Lynch syndrome-associated gene. Six patients had more than 1 tumor analyzed, 2 of whom displayed an acquired MSI-H phenotype later in their disease course. Eleven patients with MSI-H/dMMR castration-resistant prostate cancer received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Six of these (54.5%) had a greater than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels, 4 of whom had radiographic responses. As of May 2018, 5 of the 6 responders (5 of 11 total [45.5%]) were still on therapy for as long as 89 weeks. The MSI-H/dMMR molecular phenotype is uncommon yet therapeutically meaningful in prostate cancer and can be somatically acquired during disease evolution. Given the potential for durable responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, these findings support the use of prospective tumor sequencing to screen all patients with advanced prostate cancer for MSI-H/dMMR. Because not all patients with the MSI-H/dMMR phenotype respond, further studies should explore mechanisms of resistance.

DNA Repair Gene Alterations and PARP Inhibitor Response in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Background: PARP inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose tumors harbor homologous recombination DNA repair gene alterations. However, questions remain for many practicing clinicians about which patients are ideally suited for PARP inhibitor treatment. This report details our institutional experience using PARP inhibitor therapy in patients whose tumors harbored specific DNA repair gene alterations. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients at Oregon Health & Science University who were treated with PARP inhibition. We identified 8 patients and determined the impact of the specific DNA repair gene alterations on tumor response and time on treatment with PARP inhibition. Results: A number of DNA repair gene alterations were identified. Three patients had pathogenic BRCA2 mutations and one had a BRCA2 mutation of uncertain significance. Conversely, the 4 other patients' tumors harbored alterations in other DNA repair genes, none of which were clearly pathogenic. A statistically significant difference in benefit was seen between patients whose tumors harbored BRCA2 gene alterations and those whose tumors did not, as measured by >50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels (100% vs 0%; P=.03) and duration on therapy (31.4 vs 6.4 weeks; P=.03). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that not all DNA repair alterations are equally predictive of PARP inhibitor response. Importantly, all responding patients had tumors harboring BRCA2 DNA repair alterations, including one without a known pathogenic mutation. Conversely, among the 4 nonresponders, several DNA repair alterations in genes other than BRCA2 were identified that were not clearly pathogenic. This demonstrates the need to carefully examine the functional relevance of the DNA repair alterations identified, especially in genes other than BRCA2, when considering patients for PARP inhibitor treatment.

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a minimally invasive curative treatment for localised prostate cancer has excellent oncological and functional outcomes: a retrospective analysis from a single centre.

IntroductionLow-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy is a widely used therapeutic option for localised prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyse the oncological and functional outcomes after 10 years of experience with brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer.Material and methodsAll patients who underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017 were included for analysis. Initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, tumour stages, Gleason scores, positive biopsies, prostate volumes, dosimetric parameters, and urinary symptoms were noted.ResultsA total of 201 patients underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017. Of these patients, 159 had >3 years of oncological and functional follow-up. Only these relevant patients were included in the statistical analysis. This showed a significant, persistent decline in PSA levels (p <0.0001): the mean PSA was 1.2 ng/ml after 6 months, 1.1 ng/ml after 1 year, and 0.49 ng/ml after 3 years. Only 9 patients had tumour recurrence (3 patients with Gleason score 6 and 6 patients with Gleason score 7). After receiving adequate treatment, the patients underwent oncological follow-up.Important obstructive and irritative complaints were most pronounced during the first 9 months and decreased strongly after 18 months of follow-up.ConclusionsLDR brachytherapy has excellent oncological outcomes with limited functional inconveniences that are adequately treatable. Our 10 years' experience shows that brachytherapy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of low-risk localised prostate cancer.

Prostate-specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate–resistant prostate cancer

PurposeEvidence suggests differences in androgen receptor AR signaling between black (B) and white (W) patients with prostate cancer, but pivotal trials of abiraterone acetate (AA) for patients with metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled few black patients, a population with a higher mortality from prostate cancer. Our primary objective was to determine differences in response to AA between B and W patients. MethodsWe performed a retrospective case-control study of B vs. W patients treated with AA between May 1, 2008 and June 16, 2015 at Duke University Medical Center. Patients were identified (W control patients were matched 2:1 to B patients stratified based on previous docetaxel exposure) through pharmacy records and were eligible if treated with AA for metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer. Patients with previous enzalutamide use were excluded. The primary objective was to compare the rate of≥90% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline between B vs. W patients. Secondary outcomes included comparing time on therapy, time to PSA progression, and overall survival among groups. ResultsBaseline characteristics among patients (n = 45 B, n = 90 W) were identified; these included Karnofsky performance status, PSA, Gleason score, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, opiate use for pain, and metastatic sites. Baseline characteristics among groups were similar except for median hemoglobin (B = 11.4g/dl, W = 12.3g/dl). The proportion of B patients achieving a≥90% PSA level decline was 37.8% vs. 28.9% for W patients (P = 0.296). Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of patients achieving a≥50% PSA level decline (B = 68.9%, W = 48.9% [P = 0.028]) and≥30% PSA level decline (B = 77.8%, W = 54.4% [P = 0.008]). Rates of primary abiraterone-refractory disease (PSA increase as best response) trended higher in W (31.1%) than in B (15.6%) patients (P = 0.052). Median treatment duration (B = 9.4 mo, W = 8.3 mo) did not differ (Wilcoxon P = 0.444). Median overall survival (B = 27.3 mo [95% CI: 13.9, not estimable], W = 24.8 mo [95% CI: 19, 31.6] [P = 0.669]) and median time to PSA progression (B = 11.0 mo [95% CI: 4.3, 18.0], W = 9.4 mo [95% CI: 6.2, 13.0] [P = 0.917]) did not differ. ConclusionsBlack patients may have a higher PSA response to AA than white patients. An ongoing prospective clinical study (NCT01940276) is evaluating outcomes between black and white patients treated with AA.

Chromogranin A and neurone-specific enolase serum levels as predictors of treatment outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing abiraterone therapy.

To determine the impact of elevated neuroendocrine serum markers on treatment outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing treatment with abiraterone in a post-chemotherapy setting. Chromogranin A (CGa) and neurone-specific enolase (NSE) were determined in serum drawn before treatment with abiraterone from 45 patients with mCRPC. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined by a PSA level decline of ≥50%, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical or radiographic PFS. The CGa and NSE serum levels did not correlate (P = 0.6). Patients were stratified in to low- (nine patients), intermediate- (18) or high-risk (18) groups according to elevation of none, one, or both neuroendocrine markers, respectively. The risk groups correlated with decreasing median OS (median OS not reached vs 15.3 vs 6.6 months; P < 0.001), decreasing median clinical or radiographic PFS (8.3 vs 4.4 vs 2.7 months; P = 0.001) and decreasing median PSA-PFS (12.0 vs 3.2 vs 2.7 months; P = 0.012). In multivariate Cox regression analysis the combination of CGa and NSE (≥1 marker positive vs both markers negative) remained significant predictors of OS, clinical or radiographic PFS, and PSA-PFS. We did not observe a correlation with PSA response (63% vs 35% vs 31%; P = 0.2). Chromogranin A and NSE did not predict PSA response in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone. However, we observed a correlation with shorter PSA-PFS, clinical or radiographic PFS, and OS. This might be due to an elevated risk of developing resistance under abiraterone treatment related to neuroendocrine differentiation.

An update on enzalutamide in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Enzalutamide is an oral androgen receptor inhibitor that targets multiple steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway. In the randomized phase III AFFIRM study, significant improvements in survival versus placebo were observed when enzalutamide was used as a treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following prior treatment with docetaxel. Additional benefits included significant delay in time to first skeletal-related event, and improvement in several measures of pain and health-related quality of life. Treatment effects were consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The phase III PREVAIL study evaluated enzalutamide versus placebo in patients with mCRPC who had not received chemotherapy. Enzalutamide significantly decreased the risk of radiographic progression and death. There were also significant improvements in all secondary and prespecified exploratory endpoints, including delayed initiation of chemotherapy, reduction in risk of first skeletal-related event and a high percentage of patients with objective response compared with placebo. Enzalutamide was also studied in hormone naïve patients (as monotherapy) in a small, open-label phase II study in patients with prostate cancer who were eligible for androgen-deprivation therapy. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as ⩾80% decline in PSA level from baseline at week 25, was achieved in 92.5% of patients. Long-term follow up is ongoing. Despite differences between these three trials, enzalutamide displayed a favorable safety profile in all three patient populations. Similar rates of adverse events between the enzalutamide and placebo groups were observed in AFFIRM and PREVAIL, with fatigue, diarrhea, back pain and hot flashes being more common with enzalutamide than with placebo. Hypertension was reported at a higher rate in the enzalutamide group than in the placebo group in PREVAIL. Breast-related disorders associated with enzalutamide treatment were also reported in the Monotherapy trial. Few seizures were reported in any trial. Enzalutamide is being studied in several early disease state populations.

Early PSA level decline is an independent predictor of biochemical and clinical control for salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy

BackgroundTo improve the early detection of responders to salvage external beam radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MethodsBetween 2002 and 2007, in a single institution, 136 consecutive patients received salvage RT to a dose of 66Gy without androgen-deprivation therapy after RP for a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. PSA measurements were systematically performed before RT (PSART), at the fifth week of RT (PSA5), and in the follow-up at least twice a year (every 6mo). The PSA level decline during RT was expressed as PSA ratio (PSA5/PSART). Two different definitions of biochemical failure after salvage RT were considered: PSA level>0.4ng/ml and PSA>PSA nadir post-RT +0.4ng/ml. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. ResultsThe median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year freedom from biochemical and clinical failure rates were 57% (95% CI: 48%–66%) and 92% (95% CI: 87%–97%), respectively. The mean PSA5 was 0.61ng/ml (range: 0–7) and the mean PSA ratio was 0.67 (0–1.7). A PSA ratio<1 was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis for both definitions of biochemical failure (P = 0.01 for both) and for clinical failure (P = 0.005). ConclusionsFor patients undergoing salvage RT after RP for a rising PSA level, the absence of PSA level decline during RT is predictive of biochemical and clinical failure and may be used to rapidly identify poor responders.