Days Of Rifampin Research Articles

Duration of rifampin therapy is a key determinant of improved outcomes in early-onset acute prosthetic joint infection due to Staphylococcus treated with a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR): a retrospective multicenter study in France.

Introduction: In patients undergoing a « debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention » (DAIR) procedure for acute staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI), post-operative treatment with rifampin has been associated with a higher probability of success.(1,2) However, it is not known whether it is the total dose, delay of introduction or length of therapy with rifampin that is most strongly associated with the observed improved outcomes.Methods: A multicentric, retrospective cohort study of patients with acute staphylococcal hip and knee PJI treated with DAIR between January 2011 and December 2016. Failure of the DAIR procedure was defined as persistent infection, need for another surgery or death. We fitted logistic and Cox regression multivariate models to identify predictors of DAIR failure. We compared Kaplan-Meier estimates of failure probability in different levels of the 3 variables of interest - total dose, delay of introduction or length of therapy with rifampin - with the log-rank test.Results: 79 patients included (median age 71 years [63.5-81]; 55 men [70%]), including 54 (68%) DAIR successes and 25 (32%) DAIR failures. Patients observed for a median of 435 days [IQR 107.5-834]. Median ASA score significantly lower in DAIR successes than in DAIR failures (2 vs. 3, respectively p = 0.011). Bacterial cultures revealed 65 (82.3%) S. aureus and 16 (20.3%) coagulase negative staphylococci, with 2 patients being infected simultaneously with S. aureus and CNS. Among S. aureus isolates, 7 (10.8%) resistant to methicillin; 2 (3.1 %) resistant to rifampin. Median duration of antimicrobial therapy was 85 days [IQR 28.5-97.8]. Fifty-eight patients (73.4%) received rifampin at a median dose of 14.6 mg/kg/day |IQR 13-16.7], started at a median delay of 8.5 days [IQR, 4-7.5] after debridement surgery. Twenty-one patients (26.6%) developed a drug-related adverse event, leading to rifampin interruption in 6 of them (7.6% of total cohort). Determinants of DAIR failure were rifampin use (HR 0.17, IC [0.06, 0.45], p-value <0.001), association of rifampin with a fluoroquinolone (HR 0.19, IC [0.07, 0.53], p-value = 0.002) and duration of rifampin therapy (HR 0.97, IC [0.95, 1], p-value = 0.022). We did not observe a significant difference between DAIR successes and failures in rifampin use, dose and delay of introduction. In a multivariate Cox model, only duration of rifampin therapy was significantly associated with DAIR failure. Kaplan Meier estimate of DAIR failure probability was significantly higher in patients receiving less than 14 days of rifampin in comparison with those receiving more than 14 days of rifampin (p = 0.0017).Conclusion: Duration of rifampin therapy is a key determinant of improved outcomes in early-onset acute prosthetic joint infection due to Staphylococcus treated with DAIR.

The Use of Rifampin Therapy to Treat Diabetic Patients with Osteomyelitis of the Foot in the Veterans Health Administration: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes

Background Nearly 25% of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients are diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). Among DM patients, the lifetime incidence of foot ulcers is 15%. Infection is a common complication of foot ulcers and 20–60% of infections result in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Current treatment guidelines do not endorse any specific antibiotic agent for DFO, but small clinical trials suggest the addition of rifampin to antimicrobial regimens results in improved cure rates for osteomyelitis.Methods Using VHA databases, we identified index DFO cases from 2009 to 2013 and extracted patient and infection characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, chronic medications, antibiotic regimens, and microbiology data when present. We analyzed the subset of patients alive, without high-level amputation, and treated with antibiotics at 90 days after diagnosis. We summarized patient characteristics and compared a composite endpoint of amputation or death within 2 years of DFO diagnosis among those treated with rifampin to those not treated with rifampin.ResultsIn total, 10,736 DFO cases met our criteria (Figure). Of these, 151 were considered treated with rifampin, based on 14 or more days of rifampin initiated within 90 days of diagnosis; 10,551 were unexposed to rifampin; and 34 were excluded for late or short treatment with rifampin. We observed significant differences between patients treated with and without rifampin (Table) and 44% of rifampin-treated patients were seen in 14 facilities.Amputation or death at 2 years was observed in 44 (29%) of patients treated with rifampin and 4,007 (38%) of patients not treated with rifampin (P = 0.03).Conclusion Rifampin was rarely used in the treatment of DFO in the VHA and a few facilities accounted for a large proportion of rifampin-treated cases. We observed higher rates of amputation-free survival in patients treated with rifampin, but in the presence of notable confounders including age, comorbidities, and organism.Not treated with rifampin N = 10,551Treated with rifampin N = 151 P-valueAge (mean)6562<0.01Charlson comorbidity (mean)4.03.5<0.01Warfarin (prior 6 months) (%)9.76.60.25 S. aureus identified (%)33.945.7<0.01Complex VA Medical Center (%)39.445.00.19Disclosures E. Saade, Steris: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Janssen: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Sequiris: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Pfizer: Grant Investigator, Research grant. R. A. Bonomo, Entasis: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Allecra: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Wockhardt: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Roche: Grant Investigator, Research grant. GSK: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Allergan: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Shionogi: Grant Investigator, Research grant

Abstract CT153: Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between abemaciclib and CYP3A inducers and inhibitors

Abstract Abemaciclib is a selective and potent small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) being investigated for treatment of refractory hormone-receptor positive (HR+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In vitro, CYP3A is responsible for &amp;gt;99% of the CYP-mediated microsomal metabolism of abemaciclib and its active metabolites. Three clinical studies evaluated the disposition and metabolism and drug interaction potential of abemaciclib in the presence of a strong CYP3A-inducer, rifampin, or a strong CYP3A-inhibitor, clarithromycin. Abemaciclib disposition and metabolism were determined following a single oral 150 mg dose of [14C]-abemaciclib in healthy subjects (N = 6). In the rifampin interaction study, abemaciclib was administered as a single oral 200 mg dose in healthy subjects (N = 24) on 2 occasions: alone on Day 1 of Period 1 and in combination with 600 mg rifampin on Day 7 of Period 2, after 6 days of rifampin once daily (QD) dosing; rifampin continued QD for 7 days after abemaciclib. In the clarithromycin interaction study, abemaciclib was administered as a single oral 50 mg dose in patients with advanced cancer (N = 26) on 2 occasions: alone in Period 1 and on Day 5 of clarithromycin dosing (500 mg BID) in Period 2 followed by an additional 7 days of clarithromycin. Abemaciclib was extensively metabolized, with less than 10% of parent drug recovered unchanged in feces. Parent drug and 3 active metabolites; (LSN2839567 [M2], LSN3106729 [M18], and LSN3106726 [M20]) were detected in plasma. The mean t1/2 in healthy subjects was 29.0, 104.0, 55.9, and 43.1 hours for abemaciclib, M2, M18, and M20, respectively. Coadministration with rifampin compared to abemaciclib alone decreased abemaciclib AUC(0-?) and Cmax by 95% and 92%, respectively, and decreased AUC(0-?) and Cmax of total active species (abemaciclib + M2 + M18+ M20) by 77% and 45%, respectively. Coadministration with clarithromycin compared to abemaciclib alone increased abemaciclib AUC(0-?) and Cmax by 237% and 30%, respectively; and increased the total active species AUC(0-?) by 119% and decreased Cmax by 7%. The mean abemaciclib t1/2 was prolonged from 28.8 to 63.6 hours. No clinically significant safety concerns were observed following single doses of abemaciclib in healthy subjects or in patients with advanced cancer based on vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, and electrocardiogram data. The human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion study indicated that abemaciclib was cleared primarily by hepatic metabolism, and the clinical drug-drug interaction studies with strong CYP3A inducer and inhibitor substantiated the major role of CYP3A in the metabolism of abemaciclib. Due to significant changes in abemaciclib and active-metabolite exposure in the presence of strong CYP3A inducers and inhibitors, concomitant use with abemaciclib should be avoided, or abemaciclib dose may require adjustment. Citation Format: Palaniappan Kulanthaivel, Daruka Mahadevan, P. Kellie Turner, Jane Royalty, Wee Teck Ng, Ping Yi, Jessica Rehmel, Kenneth Cassidy, Jill Chappell. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between abemaciclib and CYP3A inducers and inhibitors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT153.

Effect of Rifampin on the Disposition of Brivaracetam in Human Subjects: Further Insights into Brivaracetam Hydrolysis.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand developed for the treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. The present phase I, open-label, two-way crossover study was designed to assess the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of BRV and its hydroxy (BRV-OH), acid (BRV-AC), and hydroxy acid (BRV-OHAC) metabolites. Twenty-six healthy subjects received BRV (150-mg single oral dose) either alone or following 5 days of rifampin 600 mg/day. BRV and its metabolites were examined for their plasma profiles and urinary excretion. Pharmacokinetic modeling was developed to estimate the rate constants of the various metabolic routes. Parallel in vitro assays were conducted to characterize the hydrolysis of BRV to BRV-AC as well as to identify any potential effect of rifampin on the hydrolysis reaction. Rifampin did not significantly affect the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of BRV, but decreased its area under the curve (AUC) by 45%. In addition, rifampin significantly increased the AUC of BRV-OH (+109%), decreased the AUC of BRV-AC (-53%), but had little effect on BRV-OHAC (-10%). In vitro assays showed that the major urinary metabolite BRV-AC (33% of the dose) was likely to be formed by amidase EC 3.5.1.4. In vitro data indicated that the enzyme was not significantly inhibited nor induced by rifampin. Modeling confirmed that all of the observed changes in vivo were secondary to the induction of the CYP2C19-mediated hydroxylation of BRV to BRV-OH (3.7-fold increase in the rate constant).

Rifampin for Surgically Treated Staphylococcal Infective Endocarditis: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Cohort Study

Rifampin is recommended as adjunctive treatment for staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). It is unclear whether this should hold for surgically treated patients. The purpose of this study was to examine whether adjunctive rifampin treatment in addition to cell wall active antimicrobial agents in patients with surgically treated staphylococcal infective endocarditis (IE) results in better outcomes. Patients operated on for staphylococcal IE from April 1, 2008, to July 1, 2014, were identified from ourinstitution's IE registry. Rifampin treatment was defined as 3 or more days of rifampin postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare a composite outcome of death or reoperation for IE relapse, between patients treated and not treated with rifampin, adjusted for propensity to be treated with rifampin, methicillin resistance, all-purpose refined diagnosis related group (APR-DRG) severity score, and APR-DRG mortality risk. In all, 273 patients were identified. The mean age was 56 years, 66% were male, 50% had PVE, 60% had S.aureus or S.lugdunensis infection, 89% hadleft side involvement, and 57% had invasive disease. Fifty-one (27%) received 3 or more days of rifampin postoperatively. Ninety-two patients died orunderwent reoperation for IE relapse at a median of 205 days (interquartile range 56 to 718 days). In a multivariable model, patients treated with rifampin had a similar hazard of death or reoperation for IE relapse as those not treated (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.32, p value 0.34). The results were robust to varying definitions of rifampin treatment. Among patients with surgically treated staphylococcal IE there was insufficient evidence to claim a reoperation-free survival benefit from treatment with rifampin. Rifampin should not be used as adjunctive therapy for staphylococcal IE in patients who have undergone surgical procedures for its treatment.

Rifampin, but not rifabutin, may produce opiate withdrawal in buprenorphine-maintained patients

BackgroundThis series of studies examines the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist increasingly used in treatment of opioid dependence, and rifampin, a medication used as a first line treatment for tuberculosis; or rifabutin, an alternative antituberculosis medication. MethodsOpioid-dependent individuals on stable doses of buprenorphine/naloxone underwent two, 24-h blood sampling studies: (1) for buprenorphine pharmacokinetics and (2) following 15 days of rifampin 600mg daily or rifabutin 300mg daily for buprenorphine and rifampin or rifabutin pharmacokinetics. ResultsRifampin administration produced significant reduction in plasma buprenorphine concentrations (70% reduction in mean area under the curve (AUC); p=<0.001) and onset of opiate withdrawal symptoms in 50% of participants (p=0.02). While rifabutin administration to buprenorphine-maintained subjects resulted in a significant decrease in buprenorphine plasma concentrations (35% decrease in AUC; p<0.001) no opiate withdrawal was seen. Compared with historical control data, buprenorphine had no significant effect on rifampin pharmacokinetics, but was associated with 22% lower rifabutin mean AUC (p=0.009), although rifabutin and its active metabolite concentrations remained in the therapeutic range. ConclusionsRifampin is a more potent inducer of buprenorphine metabolism than rifabutin with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic adverse consequences. Those patients requiring rifampin treatment for tuberculosis and receiving buprenorphine therapy are likely to require an increase in buprenorphine dose to prevent withdrawal symptoms. Rifabutin administration was associated with decreases in buprenorphine plasma concentrations, but no clinically significant adverse events were observed.

Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir in HIV-Infected Adults Receiving Rifampin with Adjusted Doses of Lopinavir-Ritonavir Tablets

Rifampin coadministration dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir (LPV) concentrations. In healthy volunteers, doubling the dose of a lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) capsule formulation overcame this interaction, but a subsequent study of double doses of the tablet formulation was stopped early owing to hepatotoxicity. However, healthy-volunteer study findings may not apply to HIV-infected adults. We evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV in HIV-infected adults virologically suppressed on an LPV/r regimen who were given rifampin, and the dose of the LPV/r tablet formulation was gradually increased. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV/r were evaluated at baseline, a week after commencing rifampin, a week after the LPV/r dose was increased 1.5 times, and a week after the LPV/r dose was doubled. Twenty-one participants were enrolled. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] predose LPV concentrations (C(0)) were 8.1 (6.2 to 9.8) mg/liter at baseline, 1.7 (0.3 to 3.0) mg/liter after 7 days of rifampin, 5.9 (2.1 to 9.9) mg/liter with 1.5 times the dose of LPV/r, and 10.8 (7.0 to 13.1) mg/liter with double-dose LPV/r. There were no significant differences in the LPV area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), C(0), C(12), maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), or half-life (t(1/2)) between the baseline and double-dose LPV/r time points. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with two participants developing asymptomatic grade 3/4 transaminitis. Doubling the dose of the tablet formulation of LPV/r overcomes induction by rifampin. Less hepatotoxicity occurred in our cohort of HIV-infected participants than was reported in healthy-volunteer studies.

Addition of Rifampin to Standard Therapy for Treatment of Native Valve Infective Endocarditis Caused byStaphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of native valve infective endocarditis (IE). Rifampin is often added to traditional therapy for the management of serious S. aureus infections. There are no large, prospective studies documenting the safety and efficacy of adjunctive therapy with rifampin for treatment of native valve S. aureus IE. We reviewed all cases of definite native valve S. aureus IE confirmed by modified Duke criteria in a large urban hospital between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2005. A retrospective cohort analysis was used to assess the impact of the addition of rifampin to standard therapy. There were 42 cases of S. aureus IE treated with the addition of rifampin and 42 controls. Cases received a median of 20 days of rifampin (range, 14 to 48 days). Rifampin-resistant S. aureus isolates developed in nine cases who received rifampin before clearance of bacteremia (56%), while significant hepatic transaminase elevations also occurred in nine cases, all of whom had hepatitis C infection. Unrecognized significant drug-drug interactions with rifampin occurred frequently (52%). Cases were more likely to have a longer duration of bacteremia (5.2 versus 2.1 days; P < 0.001) and were less likely to survive (79% versus 95%; P = 0.048) than controls. Our results suggest that the potential for hepatotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, and the emergence of resistant S. aureus isolates warrants a careful risk-benefit assessment before adding rifampin to standard antibiotic treatment of native valve S. aureus IE until further clinical studies are performed.

Stereoselective Bupropion Hydroxylation as an In Vivo Phenotypic Probe for Cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6) Activity

The clearance of racemic bupropion, metabolized selectively by CYP2B6 in vitro, has been used clinically to phenotype CYP2B6 activity, polymorphisms, and drug interactions but has known limitations. Bupropion hydroxylation by CYP2B6 is stereoselective. This investigation assessed the stereoselectivity of bupropion pharmacokinetics and the influence of CYP2B6 induction. Ten healthy volunteers received immediate-release bupropion before and after 7 days of rifampin. Plasma and urine bupropion and hydroxybupropion were analyzed using a stereoselective assay. Plasma area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum concentrations were 3-fold greater for R- than S-bupropion. Bupropion apparent oral clearance was 3- and 2-fold greater for S- than R- and R,S-bupropion, respectively. Hydroxybupropion plasma AUC(0-infinity) and elimination half-life were significantly less for (S,S)- than (R,R)- and the racemate. (S,S)-hydroxybupropion was formation rate limited, whereas (R,R)-hydroxybupropion and the racemate were elimination rate limited. Rifampin doubled both R- and S-bupropion clearance and caused 4-fold increases in both (R,R)- and (S,S)-hydroxybupropion formation clearances. Increases in the plasma hydroxybupropion/bupropion AUC(0-infinity) ratio were greater for (S,S)- than (R,R)-hydroxybupropion. Simplified plasma and urine metrics of stereoselective bupropion metabolism and clearance were identified. Because metabolite formation clearance is the best in vivo metric of enzyme activity and due, therefore, to faster S-bupropion elimination and formation rate-limited (S,S)-hydroxybupropion kinetics, stereoselective S-bupropion hydroxylation and (S,S)-hydroxybupropion formation clearance may be a useful and improved phenotypic probe for CYP2B6.

Simultaneous assessment of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 activity in vivo with alprazolam and caffeine

Alprazolam (ALP) and caffeine (CAF) were suggested as probe drugs for the activities of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2, respectively. We investigated the disposition of oral ALP (1 mg) and CAF (100 mg) in 17 normal volunteers to establish and validate a procedure for the simultaneous assessment of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity. Nine received ALP alone, ALP and CAF and CAF alone in an open three-way crossover study to test for pharmacokinetic interaction. Four received ALP after a 2-day pretreatment with ketoconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4, and four normal volunteers received ALP after 4 days of rifampin, an inducer of CYP3A4. AUC values of ALP and CAF administered alone were not different from AUC values when both drugs were administered combined, indicating that there is no metabolic interaction. The ratio formed of paraxanthine and CAF correlated significantly with systemic CAF clearance at 3,4,6,8,10 and 24 h. There was a strong correlation between AUC values of ALP and CAF and the plasma concentration obtained 6,8,10, or 24 h after ingestion of the drug. Ketoconazole and rifampin pretreatment significantly changed AUC values of ALP (mean AUC values in μg/l h: ALP = 242.2, ALP + ketoconazole = 426.2, ALP + rifampin = 28.4, ANOVA F = 17.7, P < 0.001). We conclude that ALP and CAF can be administered simultaneously for the assessment of CYP activity. Plasma concentrations 6, 8, 10, and 24 h after drug ingestion reflect AUC of ALP and CAF and therefore in-vivo CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 activity, respectively.