Journal of Applied EcologyVolume 52, Issue 2 p. 538-538 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: A decision framework for considering climate change adaptation in biodiversity conservation planning Tom H. Oliver, Richard J. Smithers, Sallie Bailey, Clive A. Walmsley, Kevin Watts, Paul Armsworth, Volume 49Issue 6Journal of Applied Ecology pages: 1247-1255 First Published online: November 29, 2012 First published: 12 March 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12396Citations: 2AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Oliver, T.H., Smithers, R.J., Bailey, S., Walmsley, C.A. & Watts, K. (2012) A decision framework for considering climate change adaptation in biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1247–1255. During the process of running species through the decision framework, an issue has been encountered for species where New Climate Space is a very long distance from currently occupied areas. In these cases, there is little or no scope to facilitate colonisation by improving habitat connectivity before attempting translocation, which is the order of actions suggested by the original decision tree for New Climate Space areas. Our original motivation was to ensure that higher priority was given to actions that are beneficial to a wide range of species and not just the focal species. However, in cases where there is clearly no way to facilitate colonisation for a focal species by improving habitat connectivity, it makes no sense for the decision framework to promote such actions. Therefore, the original decision tree relating to New Climate Space areas (Fig. 4) has been revised (below) to include an additional question (‘What is the potential to facilitate colonisation by improving habitat connectivity?’), which avoids this eventuality and, in appropriate circumstances where the availability of suitable high quality habitat is high, leads directly to consideration of translocation. Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Decision tree for New Climate Space. Light grey boxes with solid borders indicate questions whose answers lead to different routes through the tree. If the answer to a question is uncertain, then multiple routes should be through the tree simultaneously. Light grey boxes with dashed borders indicate suggested adaptation actions, with relevant additional information in dark grey boxes. The decision tree has been revised to include an additional question box highlighted in red here (see main text for explanation). Reference Oliver, T.H., Smithers, R.J., Bailey, S., Walmsley, C.A. & Watts, K. (2012) A decision framework for considering climate change adaptation in biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1247– 1255. Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume52, Issue2April 2015Pages 538-538 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation