it's suicide to stay there." Covington is a writer in search of stories to tell. This is what Salvation on Sand Mountain is about: Covington's story. This book is not useful as a study of serpent handlers or of religion in Appalachia. The people and their beliefs are presented stereotypically. We are reminded of supposedly outdated clothing, poverty, and the toothless. Covington's imagination and writing skill transform even the most basic facts. The Porters' pleasant brick house gets transformed into a bricked-over double-wide trailer. (It is not; I have been to this house). Covington is unlikely to be back on Sand Mountain. He teaches creative writing (not journalism) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham . He is truly a talented writer who used his considerable creative skills to transform more than the Porters' brick home. His story robbed those on Sand Mountain of the fair opportunity to have their own story told in any approximation to historical or descriptive adequacy . In a passionate and tearfully troubled reaction to Covington's book from the wife of the serpent handler Covington most befriended, we have the other more truthful side of the critical acclaim many have heaped upon Covington's book: "He betrayed our trust; he just wanted to tell a story." —Ralph W. Hood, Jr. Dexter Collett. Bibliography of Theses and Dissertations Pertaining to Southern Appalachia: 1912-1991. Berea, Kentucky: Appalachian Imprints , 1994. 136 pages. $29.95. If literature (drama, fiction, nonfiction, oral literature, and poetry) is a mirror of culture, then literary criticism is a study of the quality of the mirror. Among the forms of criticism are theses and dissertations which we require graduate students to write and then, all too often, put on the shelf and forget. Not Dexter Collett. In Bibliography of Theses and Dissertations Pertaining to Southern Appalachia: 1912-1991, he reminds us ofa significant number of critical and scholarly studies on Appalachian literature and folklore, 1185 to be exact, produced in the colleges and universities in the region and outside it. Obviously this has been a huge effort by Collett and a valuable one. Anyone with any involvement in Appalachian studies should own a copy of this book. For graduate faculty in the region who direct theses or dissertations on a regular basis, it is indispensable. While Bibliography is primarily a listing, no little achievement in itself since Collett actually held in hand every entry mentioned, a thirty-page 56 foreword and structure facilitate ready use. The six major divisions are (1) Early Narrative and Travel Sketches, (2) General Studies, (3) Individual Authors, (4) Creative Writing, (5) Folklore, and (6) Drama, Theater, and Film. If my arithmetic is correct, there are 266 studies of folklore on a wide range of topics such as English and Scottish ballads, musical instruments, folk tales, folk speech and dialect, arts and crafts, superstitions, and children's folk games. A breakdown of studies according to theme in the folklore section might have been helpful, but students of folklore and language will still be grateful for this abundant material in its present form. Many of the theses clearly involve primary research; for example, "Mary A. Gannaway, 'The Singing Games of the Cumberland Mountains in Tennessee,' Master's Thesis, George Peabody College, 1935." Several of the studies have been published, such as the 1941 Ph.D. Columbia University dissertation, "Phonetics of Great Smoky Mountain Speech," by Joseph Sargent Hall, but most have not, which is no intended criticism of their value. Several of the titles are compelling such as the M.A. thesis by Robin L. Geller done at the University of North Carolina in 1974, "Feuding in Appalachia and the Middle East: A Comparative Analysis." Of the ninety-three general studies, Collett pays special attention (and tribute) to dissertations on Appalachian literature by (1) Laurie Leslie Banner, University of North Carolina, 1984, (2) Carvel Collins, University of Chicago, 1944, (3) Isabella D. Harris, Duke University, 1948, (4) Danny Miller, University of Cincinnati, 1985, (5) Barbara S. Kirkpatrick, University of Maryland, 1974, (6) H. R. Stoneback, Vanderbilt University, 1970, and of course Cratis Williams, New York University, 1961. A listing of other useful sources appears in "Works...
Read full abstract