Daily Survey Data Research Articles

The expanded Child Tax Credit and low-income families’ food insecurity: Associations across and within months of receipt

In response to the pandemic-induced economic crisis for U.S. families, the federal government expanded the Child Tax Credit (CTC) via the distribution of monthly payments in the second half of 2021. Studies have found that these monthly payments corresponded with reductions in food insecurity, but what is not yet clear is whether these declines were stable across and within the months of receipt. Using novel, daily survey data among a sample of low-income families at high risk of food insecurity (N = 146), we tested whether the CTC payments were associated with stable rates of day-to-day food security. We found consistent declines in food insecurity across CTC months, though smaller declines for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients who experienced lower food insecurity rates, on average. Within a CTC month, we found that food insecurity was stable for non-SNAP families for the first few weeks, but spiked in the week prior to the next payment. SNAP families’ within-month patterns of food insecurity, however, appeared to be tied more to their SNAP benefit timing than CTC payment timing. Both groups saw end-of-the-month spikes in food insecurity among those who received higher CTC amounts, suggesting the money may have been more difficult to stretch across families with a greater number of children. These results suggest that the effectiveness of cash payments like the CTC in reducing economic hardships may depend on family characteristics like receipt of other federal benefits and household size. Accordingly, future provisions of cash assistance may benefit from going beyond income alone and tailoring the amount to a family’s benefits package.

Who is to blame for incivility? The influences of family undermining on employee incivility towards customers

Drawing on self-regulation theory, we examined the relationship between family undermining and employee incivility towards customers on a daily basis. We propose that daily family undermining is related not only to daily rumination about family but also to daily anxiety, and in turn, more daily employee incivility towards customers. In addition, we argue that a higher (vs. lower) level of family-supportive supervision at the between-person level weakens the effects of daily family undermining on daily rumination about family and daily anxiety. Multilevel analyses of daily survey data from 247 employees support the hypotheses. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed and future directions for research are suggested.

Promoting Well-Being and Responsiveness in Pre-Service Teachers Using Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills: A Mixed-Methods Study

Mindfulness trainings are a promising approach for mitigating teacher burnout and promoting well-being and effective teaching, yet few studies with pre-service teachers employ this approach for prevention purposes, and only one has used dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills. In this study, 12 pre-service teachers were taught DBT skills in eight 1-hour weekly sessions to promote their mindfulness and well-being. Using mixed methods, we investigated how pre-service teachers used DBT skills and evaluated training effects and feasibility. Findings from 81 days of daily survey data indicated that pre-service teachers’ mindfulness and positive affect were significantly higher the evening after training sessions and that their positive affect remained elevated through the next evening. Completed homework sheets, researcher journals, and interviews provided evidence of how the pre-service teachers used DBT skills to navigate challenges and support their students. We identified the need for more frequent sessions and additional structures to promote practice of DBT skills in daily life. The results from this study point to the feasibility of using DBT skills in a preventative capacity as part of teacher preparation programming to support teachers’ ongoing well-being and effective teaching.

Different Effects of Job Crafting Towards Strengths and Job Crafting Towards Development

Job crafting research has predominantly focused on the changes made by the crafter to the job but neglected personal motives and goals underlying the crafting. The motives and goals are important as job crafting that looks similar in terms of behavior could lead to different outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate how job crafting towards strengths (JC-strengths) and job crafting towards development (JC-development) lead to distinct performance outcomes, and factors that affect the two job crafting strategies. Drawing on the exploitation and exploration theory, we expected a positive relationship of JC-strengths with task performance and JC-development with creative performance. We further proposed that job autonomy will be positively related to both JC-strengths and JC-development. Moreover, the relationship between job autonomy and JC-strengths will be strengthened by pay for performance, while the relationship between job autonomy and JC-development will be weakened by pay for performance. With the use of 10-day daily survey data from 115 employees, we found distinct effects of JC-strengths and JC-development on task performance and creative performance as expected. Job autonomy was positively related to JC-strengths and this relationship was strengthened by pay for performance. However, we did not find a significant role of job autonomy and pay for performance in influencing JC-development.

Can venting hamper high emotionally intelligent recipient's reattachment to work?

PurposeThis study investigates how healthcare workers' venting - an emotion-focused form of coping during non-working hours - has unintended costs via its effect on spouses' reattachment to work if life partners are dual-earners. Research also examined anxiety as a causal mechanism that connects the receipt of venting with failure in reattachment to work. Lastly, our theory suggests that not everyone has the same experience with venting; the effect varies at different levels of emotional intelligence.Design/methodology/approachMultilevel path analysis using MPlus 8.3 was conducted to examine the daily survey data obtained from 101 spouses of healthcare workers over four consecutive workdays using the experience sampling technique.FindingsThe results suggested that receipt of venting increases anxiety and adversely influences reattachment to work through increased anxiety. The findings supported the suggested model's predictions, indicating that anxiety mediated the link between the receipt of venting and reattachment to work, and the mediation was partial. Further, emotional intelligence buffers the positive effect of receipt of venting on anxiety and the negative on reattachment to work. Lastly, the findings indicate that moderated mediation exists: the indirect effect of receipt of venting on reattachment to work is not as strong at higher levels of emotional intelligence.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt that identified the receipt of venting as a predictor of reattachment to work. Moreover, up till now, no study has examined the mediating role of anxiety in the relationship between receipt of venting and reattachment to work. Finally, this is the preliminary effort that validated the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the above-mentioned links.

1213. Vaccine Uptake Amongst Participants in the North Carolina COVID-19 Community Research Partnership Who Were Initially Receptive or Hesitant to Receive a COVID-19 Vaccine

BackgroundPublic health officials are concerned that adults may refuse to be vaccinated with an approved COVID-19 vaccine thereby limiting the community health benefit. Here, we studied the self-reported intent to be vaccinated of persons in North Carolina (NC) and then measured whether they did or did not get vaccinated. MethodsThe Community COVID-19 Research Partnership (CCRP) is a large prospective study exploring COVID-19 epidemiology and sequelae in participants of several mid-Atlantic and Southern States. All participants complete an online daily survey where they are asked questions about COVID-like symptoms, infections, and their vaccination status. In addition to the daily survey, in December 2020, we implemented a short online cross-sectional survey questioning NC participants on whether they intended to be vaccinated. After completing the cross-sectional survey, we used daily survey data through 15 May 2021 to see if participants reported receiving vaccine. Unvaccinated participants who did not complete the daily survey 30 days or more prior to 15 May 2021 were excluded.Results18,874 participants completed the cross-sectional survey and reported vaccination status. Of these participants, 90% were white, 68% were female, 26% were healthcare workers, and 2% self-reported COVID-19 diagnosis The median age was 54 years (IQR: 41 – 65). 79%, 13%, 9%, and 2% answered yes, unsure, no, and prefer not to answer, respectively, about intention to be vaccinated (Table). 99% of the participants who intended to receive the COVID-19 vaccine reporting being vaccinated. Those who were unsure or intended not to get vaccinated had vaccination rates of 80% and 53%, respectively. 78% of the participants who preferred not to answer were vaccinated. TableVaccine intent versus vaccine status – COVID-19 Community Research Partnership, North Carolina, December 2020 – May 2021 ConclusionMore than three-quarters of NC participants intended to get vaccinated and by mid-May 2021, the vast majority had received at least one dose. Similarly, those who were unsure or preferred not to say were mostly vaccinated. Even among those who reported they would not get vaccine in January, more than half had received vaccine by May. The nature of our sample makes it difficult to generalize results to the population of NC; nevertheless, further investigation as to the causes of the shift in attitudes is warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

How laws affect the perception of norms: Empirical evidence from the lockdown.

Laws not only affect behavior due to changes in material payoffs, but they may also change the perception individuals have of social norms, either by shifting them directly or by providing information on these norms. Using detailed daily survey data and exploiting the introduction of lockdown measures in the UK in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, we provide causal evidence that the law drastically changed the perception of the norms regarding social distancing behaviors. We show that this effect of laws on perceived norms is mostly driven by an informational channel and that the intervention made perceptions of social norms converge to the actual prevalent norm.

Reattachment to work in the morning and day-level leader outcomes

Successfully reattaching to work (i.e., mentally reconnecting) after a nonwork period can set the tone for the workday. This study examines anticipated task focus and activated positive affect as mechanisms linking leaders’ reattachment to work in the morning to leader experiences and behaviors throughout the workday. Based on daily-survey data from 416 leaders (2646 total morning/evening survey completions), we conducted multilevel structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Results indicate that day-level reattachment to work in the morning was associated with anticipated task focus and activated positive affect, which in turn were both associated with leader workplace vitality and transformational leadership behavior. Hypotheses regarding leader task accomplishment were not supported. Supplementary analyses indicated that reattachment was indirectly related to perceived task accomplishment through a two-stage mediation – i.e., via anticipated task focus in the morning and actual task focus throughout the workday. Findings point to the important role of reattachment to work in leader experiences and behaviors throughout the workday. Results also indicate the relevance of reattachment to work as an experience and potential strategy that helps leaders successfully move from nonwork to work domains creating positive outcomes for themselves and their followers throughout the workday.

Positive work reflection during the evening and next‐day work engagement: Testing mediating mechanisms and cyclical processes

Studies have shown that positive work reflection during evening leisure time is related to short‐term affective benefits at bedtime and in the next morning. This study examines whether the favourable outcomes of positive work reflection persist into the next workday and tests mediating processes between evening positive work reflection and next‐day work engagement. Based on daily survey data from 152 employees (total of 687 days), we found that positive work reflection predicted next morning perceived work meaningfulness, next morning psychological availability, and next‐day co‐worker support. Perceived work meaningfulness and co‐worker support, but not psychological availability, in turn, predicted afternoon work engagement. Work engagement predicted subsequent positive work reflection. This study demonstrates that positively thinking about work‐related issues during leisure time is associated with positive outcomes during the next workday, which prompt subsequent positive work reflection.Practitioner points Employees should be encouraged to reflect positively about their day at work during after‐work hours; instead of striving for full mental disengagement from work, employees could develop habits of positively reflecting about their workday during evening hours. Being fully engaged during the day at work may support positive work reflection during the evening; accordingly, employees may focus on work experiences characterized by high vigour, dedication, and absorption. Being aware of one’s work meaningfulness and receiving co‐worker support is helpful for translating positive work reflection into work engagement; accordingly, mental exercises that emphasize meaningfulness and acts that facilitate co‐worker support might be effective tools for increasing work engagement.

Too proactive to switch off: When taking charge drains resources and impairs detachment.

Although proactive behavior is an important determinant of individual work performance, its consequences for employee well-being and other personal outcomes have been largely neglected. In this study, we adopted a within-person perspective to investigate how taking charge behavior (a form of proactivity) affects employees' life outside of work by examining when and how it impacts on their ability to detach and recover from work. Drawing upon resource drain theory, we hypothesized that taking charge has the potential to undermine the process of detachment and recovery from work by draining personal resources. However, based on self-determination theory, we identified autonomous motivation as an essential boundary condition, such that the negative effects of taking charge on detachment and recovery via resource drain occur only when daily autonomous motivation is low. We tested this model on a sample of 77 managers, who provided daily survey data 3 times per day over 5 consecutive working days. Our analyses showed that daily taking charge behavior was negatively related to detachment in the evening, via resource drain, only on days in which people reported low autonomous motivation at work. However, this conditional effect of taking charge did not reach through to next morning recovery. No negative effects of daily taking charge on detachment were observed when people had high autonomous motivation. Overall, these findings suggest that, under some motivational conditions, proactivity can consume resources and interfere with the process of detachment. We offer practical advice for how organizations might encourage proactive behavior while minimizing its drawbacks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Abstract 15845: Heart Heroes: A Gamified Mhealth Platform to Measure Continuous Cardiac Health Data in the Outpatient Setting of Adolescent Patients With Known and Suspected Heart Disease

Introduction: Adolescents with heart disease report difficulty in communication about their health as a major inhibiting factor in their care. MHealth technologies collect health data in daily life and enable health data sharing between the provider and patient. The adolescent population has a high level of engagement with mobile devices and a willingness to use them for health-related activities. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that our novel gamified mHealth platform Heart Hero can engage adolescent patients in the collection of cardiac health data in their daily life. Methods: We designed the research app using ResearchKit to collect continuous physiological data from the Apple Watch and daily survey data on well-being, stress, medical adherence, and cardiac symptoms. Patients were provided the app, iPhone, and Apple Watch and enrolled for 27 days. A final in-app survey was provided to assess feedback. We enrolled 28 patients total who were scheduled for outpatient cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Results: Mean age was 14.3 years old (SD +/-3.08) with a 1:1 M:F ratio. 61% of patients were ≥ 15 years of age. 94% of patients completed the final survey. Subjects on average completed 64% (SEM +/-5) of the daily quizzes with an average daily adherence of over 50% wearing the watch. 100% reported they liked using the watch and app, and 89% would like to continue wearing the Apple Watch. 53% reported the study encouraged them to exercise more while 21% reported encouragement to walk more. Fig 1 demonstrates A) Apple Watch and b) daily survey data collected from a patient throughout the study. Conclusions: In conclusion, Heart Hero is a mHealth platform which can successfully be used to collect continuous health data from the adolescent population with high engagement characterized by adherence and positive patient feedback. Adherence to the app was notably superior to the initial 5 ResearchKit applications enrolling adult patients.

Satisfaction of scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown

The discussion of the social, political and economic consequences of the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic mainly revolves around negative effects. This study exploits a unique opportunity and analyses data from a survey (N = 13,316) that happened to be in the field in the months of the development and eventual manifestation of the COVID-19 pandemic. It documents slightly higher levels of average general life satisfaction as well as of satisfaction with various specific aspects of life (health, work, work-life balance and leisure) during the lockdown among scientists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. It is argued that the lockdown can be regarded as a large-scale social experiment of a very sudden and abrupt change of work and social life, which is unique in history. Daily survey data elicited before and after the lockdown allows the construction of a quasi-experimental design for analysing how this abrupt change of social reality has affected satisfaction. For scientists, the lockdown mainly entailed the transition to work from home, leading to a reduced speed of life and allowing for more flexibility in incorporating family and leisure into the work day. It is discussed how some of these mechanisms might apply to the general population.

COVID-19 and Parent-Child Psychological Well-being.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 has changed American society in ways that are difficult to capture in a timely manner. With this study, we take advantage of daily survey data collected before and after the crisis started to investigate the hypothesis that the crisis has worsened parents' and children's psychological well-being. We also examine the extent of crisis-related hardships and evaluate the hypothesis that the accumulation of hardships will be associated with parent and child psychological well-being. Daily survey data were collected between February 20 and April 27, 2020, from hourly service workers with a young child (aged 2-7) in a large US city (N = 8222 person-days from 645 individuals). A subsample completed a one-time survey about the effects of the crisis fielded between March 23 and April 26 (subsample n = 561). Ordered probit models revealed that the frequency of parent-reported daily negative mood increased significantly since the start of the crisis. Many families have experienced hardships during the crisis, including job loss, income loss, caregiving burden, and illness. Both parents' and children's well-being in the postcrisis period was strongly associated with the number of crisis-related hardships that the family experienced. Consistent with our hypotheses, in families that have experienced multiple hardships related to the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis, both parents' and children's mental health is worse. As the crisis continues to unfold, pediatricians should screen for mental health, with particular attention to children whose families are especially vulnerable to economic and disease aspects of the crisis.

How Laws Affect the Perception of Norms: Empirical Evidence from the Lockdown

Laws not only affect behavior due to changes in material payoffs, but they may also change the perception individuals have of societal norms, either by shifting them directly or by providing information on these norms. Using detailed daily survey data and exploiting the introduction of lockdown measures in the UK in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, we provide causal evidence that the law drastically changed the perception of the norms regarding social distancing behaviors. We show this effect of laws on perceived norms is mostly driven by an informational channel.

Information frictions and access to the Paycheck Protection Program

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) extended 669 billion dollars of forgivable loans in an unprecedented effort to support small businesses affected by the COVID-19 crisis. This paper provides evidence that information frictions and the “first-come, first-served” design of the PPP program skewed its resources towards larger firms and may have permanently reduced its effectiveness. Using new daily survey data on small businesses in the U.S., we show that the smallest businesses were less aware of the PPP and less likely to apply. If they did apply, the smallest businesses applied later, faced longer processing times, and were less likely to have their application approved. These frictions may have mattered, as businesses that received aid report fewer layoffs, higher employment, and improved expectations about the future.

Information Frictions and Access to the Paycheck Protection Program

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) extended 669 billion dollars of forgivable loans in an unprecedented effort to support small businesses affected by the COVID-19 crisis. This paper provides evidence that information frictions and the “first-come, first-served” design of the PPP program skewed its resources towards larger firms and may have permanently reduced its effectiveness. Using new daily survey data on small businesses in the U.S., we show that the smallest businesses were less aware of the PPP and less likely to apply. If they did apply, the smallest businesses applied later, faced longer processing times, and were less likely to have their application approved. These frictions may have mattered, as businesses that received aid report fewer layoffs, higher employment, and improved expectations about the future.

Do Monetary Policy Announcements Shift Household Expectations?

We use a decade of daily survey data from Gallup to study how monetary policy influences households’ beliefs about economic conditions. We first document that public confidence in the state of the economy reacts instantaneously to certain types of macroeconomic news. Next, we show that surprises to the federal funds target rate are among the news that have statistically significant and instantaneous effects on economic confidence. Specifically, we find that a surprise increase in the target rate robustly leads to an immediate decline in household confidence, at odds with previous findings that suggest consumers are largely inattentive to economic developments. Monetary policy news about forward guidance and asset purchases does not have similarly clear and robust immediate effects on household beliefs. We document heterogeneity across demographics in the responsiveness of macroeconomic beliefs to aggregate news, and we relate our findings to existing evidence on informational rigidities.

Do Monetary Policy Announcements Shift Household Expectations?

We use a decade of daily survey data from Gallup to study how monetary policy influences households' beliefs about economic conditions. We first document that public confidence in the state of the economy reacts instantaneously to certain types of macroeconomic news. Next, we show that surprises to the Federal Funds target rate are among the news that have statistically significant and instantaneous effects on economic confidence. Specifically, we find that a surprise increase in the target rate robustly leads to an immediate decline in household confidence, at odds with previous findings that suggest consumers are largely inattentive to economic developments. Monetary policy news about forward guidance and asset purchases does not have similarly clear and robust immediate effects on household beliefs. We document heterogeneity across demographics in the responsiveness of macroeconomic beliefs to aggregate news, and we relate our findings to existing evidence on informational rigidities.

A wearables-based approach to detect and identify momentary engagement in afterschool Makerspace programs

Educational activities and programs associated with the Maker movement, which emphasizes creation of physical and digital artifacts as part of the learning experience, are presumed to be highly engaging for youth. However, there has been limited research examining what features of Maker learning activities are associated with youth engagement. We describe a research approach using wearable electrodermal activity sensors and wearable cameras to obtain data from two afterschool programs at a community Makerspace for adolescent girls (N = 12, 13). Using data obtained from these two sources along with daily survey data, we compare what is revealed from these different data sources. We observe a moderate correlation between electrodermal activity and engagement from survey responses. We also observe that activities emphasizing personal expression elicited engagement from many youth. From the EDA data and first-person video, we also identify 23 moments when groups of participants had several concurrent EDA responses suggesting high levels momentary engagement. Key features associated with those moments were opportunities for peer socialization, interactive instructional discourse, and physical making activities when objects were being assembled and manipulated.

Do Monetary Policy Announcements Shift Household Expectations?

We use a decade of daily survey data from Gallup to study how monetary policy influences households' beliefs about economic conditions. We first document that public confidence in the state of the economy reacts instantaneously to certain types of macroeconomic news. Next, we show that surprises to the Federal Funds target rate are among the news that have statistically significant and instantaneous effects on economic confidence. Specifically, we find that a surprise increase in the target rate robustly leads to an immediate decline in household confidence, at odds with previous findings that suggest consumers are largely inattentive to economic developments. Monetary policy news about forward guidance and asset purchases does not have similarly clear and robust immediate effects on household beliefs. We document heterogeneity across demographics in the responsiveness of macroeconomic beliefs to aggregate news, and we relate our findings to existing evidence on informational rigidities.