Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents Research Articles

Establishing Geriatric Opiate Use Patterns in Trauma.

Introduction: There is evidence that providers often overprescribe opiates in the postoperative period. Despite an ever-growing geriatric population, there is little research detailing current opiate usage in older patients after trauma. This population presents a unique set of challenges for pain management and prescription drug dependence due to sensitivity, a narrow therapeutic window, and high rates of pre-existing polypharmacy.Objective: Assess the use of narcotics in geriatric trauma patients with various injury patterns to establish a reference point for future intervention for reduction in narcotic dependence.Methods: We created a database of trauma patients' age ≥65 years admitted to a single level 1 trauma center in the Southeastern United States during the 2019 calendar year. Information gathered included patient factors, injury patterns, operative intervention, pain medications prescribed during hospitalization and at discharge, total and average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) inpatient and outpatient, and requests/prescriptions for narcotics at follow-up.Results: In 2019, there were 475 patients aged ≥65 admitted to our level 1 trauma center for acute traumatic injuries. 219 of those patients required operative intervention. Average total inpatient MME for this cohort was 169.0 with average daily MME of 22.89. The average total prescribed MME upon discharge was 79.27. There were 29 patients documented to request narcotic prescription refill at time of clinic follow-up, 27 of whom were prescribed a narcotic medication at follow-up.Conclusion: This dataset establishes a reference point for opiate use in geriatric trauma patients to facilitate further research for mitigation of risk in this population.

Association of Average Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents and Falls in Older Adult Chronic Opioid Users.

Opioids remain commonly prescribed in older adults, despite the known association with falls and fall-related injuries. This retrospective cohort study sought to determine the association of opioid use and falls in older adult opioid users. Using a one-year lookback period in electronic health records, daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated using prescription orders. Fall history was based on patient self-reporting. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the threshold of average daily MMEs at which the likelihood of falls was increased. Older opioid users were most often women and White, with 30% having fallen in the prior year. In ROC analyses (n = 590), the threshold where fall risk increased was 37 MMEs (p = 0.07). Older adults prescribed more than 37 MMEs daily may be at increased fall risk and should be targeted for deprescribing interventions. Additionally, analysis on patient characteristics and covariates suggest that sex, age, COPD, sleep apnea, cancer, and psychiatric conditions may indicate an increased risk of falls in older adults taking chronic opioids (p < 0.05). Multifactorial interventions may be needed to modify fall risk beyond medication use alone.

Opioid Use in Pelvic Fractures: The Impact of Opioid Prescribing Laws in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) was established in 2016, but its impact on opioid use for pelvic fractures is understudied. We compared opioid use in 277 pelvic fracture cases between two periods: 2015-2017 (T1) and 2018-2020 (T2). Outcomes included daily inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MME), long-term opioid use (LOU) 60-90days post-discharge, and intermediate-term opioid use (IOU) 30-60days post-discharge. T1 and T2 had comparable baseline characteristics. T2 was associated with a decrease in average daily inpatient MME (58.6 vs 78.5, P = .02), particularly in younger patients. Regression analyses showed age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were significant predictors for daily inpatient MME, while time period was not. Geriatric patients in T2 had significantly decreased IOU (30% vs 9%, P = .05). Pelvic fracture type and daily MME predicted IOU, while pelvic fracture type predicted LOU. This study suggests a modest impact of these laws, but further study is needed.

Influence of Implementing an Opioid Stewardship Team in the Primary Care Setting.

Background: The Updated 2022 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain highlights the importance of shared decision making and provider-patient relationships. Interprofessional teams may be helpful in supporting providers and patients. A large, multi-site primary care department created an interprofessional primary care opioid stewardship team to target high-risk opioid prescribing and improve practice alignment with CDC recommendations through dashboard reporting and education. Objective: The primary objective was to assess reduction in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) from baseline to 6 months in patients on opioid doses ≥90 MME daily. The secondary objective assessed change in number of naloxone prescriptions from baseline to 6 months after education. Methods: The study was conducted across 30 primary care sites of one health system within Michigan from 2021 to 2022. The opioid stewardship team included 2 physicians, 3 pharmacists, a project operations manager, and IT support. Interventions included creation of a dashboard, provider education, dissemination of policy, and chart audits. Using the electronic health record (EHR) dashboard, patients on chronic opioid doses ≥90 MME daily or missing an active naloxone prescription were identified. Primary care providers (PCP) were provided with an individual list of patients for whom to consider intervention. Support was provided for prescribers, but the team did not interact with patients directly. Results: Baseline analysis identified 290 patients on doses ≥ 90 MME daily. There was reduction in median daily MME from baseline to 6 months in the overall study population (140 [105 240] vs 120 [90 240], P < .001). At 6 months 181 (62.4%) of patients had been given a prescription for naloxone versus 108 (37.2%) who had one at baseline, P < .001. Conclusion: The initiatives implemented by the opioid stewardship team resulted in statistically significant reductions in MME and an increase in naloxone prescribing from baseline to 6 months post-education.

Effect of a Multidisciplinary Review Panel on Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents for Patients With Chronic Pain.

Physicians and other health care professionals are challenged regularly to balance managing pain for patients with chronic pain receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) with following the national guidelines and standards regarding daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME). This quality improvement project aimed to determine the effect of referral to a multidisciplinary review panel on daily MME for patients receiving COT for chronic pain. This quality improvement project included patients who had an established relationship with a primary care or community internal medicine clinician at a large health care organization and were referred to a newly created multidisciplinary review panel for their recommendations regarding treatment of pain. Criteria for patient referral were diagnosis of a chronic, painful condition, and use of chronic opioid medications. These patients were selected and referred at the discretion of their primary care clinician from January 2, 2019, through December 31, 2020. Data for this project were collected at the time of initial referral to the panel and 6 months after recommendations. The daily MME were assessed at the 2 time points. Thirteen patients were referred to the review panel during the project period. The median daily MME at the time of referral was 180. Daily MME decreased by a median of 14 MME after 6 months. The MME did not increase during the project period for any participants. Referral of patients receiving COT to a multidisciplinary review panel may reduce their daily opioid dose.

A CONSULTANT PHARMACIST INTERVENTION TO DEPRESCRIBE OPIOIDS AND BENZODIAZEPINES FOR OLDER ADULTS IN PRIMARY CARE

Abstract Long-term use of opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) by older adults may cause harm. We evaluated the impact of a targeted consultant pharmacist opioid and BZD deprescribing intervention for older adults. We conducted a pragmatic study in which fifteen primary care clinics were randomized to receive standard care (n=7) or a consultant pharmacist service (n=8) to provide targeted medication review and recommendations for deprescribing opioids and BZDs. The primary outcome was opioid and BZD prescribing in the following year, using average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and diazepam milligram equivalents (DMEs). We used generalized linear models to evaluate the association of the intervention with average daily MMEs and DMEs, adjusted for medication exposures in the prior year and demographics. Incident falls were examined as a secondary outcome. We included 961 opioid and 1107 BZD users, with 15.6% and 13.6% being prescribed both medications, respectively. Average daily MMEs and DMEs prescribed at baseline were 23.6 and 7.67. Deprescribing recommendations were made for 71% of opioid and BZD users seen in intervention clinics. We observed non-statistically significant reductions in average daily MMEs (Intervention: -2.42 MMEs, Control: -1.02 MMEs, p=0.71) and DMEs (Intervention: -1.0 DMEs, Control: -0.1 DMEs, p=0.06). There was no significant reduction in incident falls. A consultant pharmacist-driven intervention is a feasible approach to deliver targeted deprescribing recommendations, but did not significantly impact medication use or falls. Future studies should explore whether multimodal interventions would be more effective in achieving deprescribing and reducing medication-related harms.

Opiate use after total hip arthroplasty for metastatic bone disease.

To investigate post-operative opioid use following a total hip arthroplasty (THA) in metastatic bone disease (MBD) patients and identify factors associated with post-operative opioid use at 6 weeks and 90 days. MBD commonly affects the hip, and surgical intervention including THA may be indicated for pain relief or to improve function. Following THA, patients are often prescribed short courses of opioids for post-operative pain relief. No study has evaluated opiate use following THA in patients for MBD. This was a retrospective review of patients using opioids preoperatively who underwent primary THA for MBD at two institutions between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative and post-operative opioid usages, respectively, at 6 weeks and 90 days were quantified through calculating daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared using the sign test. Factors associated with post-operative opioid use at 6 weeks and 90 days were compared using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Nineteen THA and 11 THA with complex acetabular reconstruction were included. At 6 weeks, 26 (86.7 percent) patients were utilizing opiates, and at 90 days, 23 (76.7 percent) patients were utilizing opiates. There was a statistically significant difference between median daily preoperative MME compared to daily MME at 90 days (p < 0.001). The only statistically significant association with opioid use at 90 days was opioid use at 6 weeks. To our knowledge, this is the first paper evaluating post-operative opioid use following primary THA in MBD patients. After THA in the setting of MBD, patients exhibit decreased post-operative opioid use. Future studies with larger cohorts should be conducted to characterize post-operative opioid use following joint arthroplasty in MBD patients.

Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment Scale: A Pain Score and Method for Measuring and Evaluating Post-Operative Pain Management-A Prospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Orthopedic surgeons commonly prescribe opioids, surpassing all medical specialties. Our objective was to develop a pain management scale that captures medication use, patient-reported pain scores, and helps orthopedic surgeons evaluate their post-operative prescribing practice. Materials and Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study followed 502 post-operative orthopedic surgery patients over a six-month period. All patients were surveyed in an orthopedic clinic at a Level 1 US Trauma Center, during a routine follow-up. Patient pain satisfaction was assessed using the validated Interventional Pain Assessment (IPA) scale, which uses three categories: 0 (no pain), 1 (tolerable pain), and 2 (intolerable pain). Daily narcotic use was translated to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) using the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) narcotics registry. When patient pain satisfaction and narcotic usage were combined, this scale was called the Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) scale. Results: The five classes based on common prescription and usage of narcotics in this cohort include the following: A (no pain medication), B (over-the-counter medication), C (occasional use of short-acting narcotics 1-30 MMEs), D (consistent/regular use of short-acting narcotics 31-79 MMEs), and E (long-duration or stronger short-acting narcotics 80+ MMEs). Patients were most satisfied with their pain management at six weeks (80.5%) and three months (75.65%), and least satisfied at two weeks (62.5%) and six months (60.9%). Additional information displayed on the DIPA graph revealed there was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients on narcotics at two weeks (65.2%) to six months (32.6%) at p < 0.001. Conclusions: The DIPA pain scale shows the relationship between patient pain perception and opioid prescription/usage, while also tracking prescriber tendencies. Providers were able to visualize their post-operative pain management progression at each designated clinic visit with corresponding alphabetical daily MME categories. In this study, results suggest that surgeons were not effective at managing the pain of patients at two weeks post-operative, which is attributed to an inadequate number of pain pills prescribed upon discharge. Overall, the DIPA graph signaled that better pain management interventions are necessitated in periods with lower efficiency scores.

A Prescribing Guideline Decreases Postoperative Opioid Prescribing in Emergency General Surgery

IntroductionPatients prescribed higher opioid dosages have a higher risk of persistent opioid use, overdose, and death. There is a lack of standardization for opioid prescribing for acute surgical pain in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. We hypothesized that implementing a guideline to standardize opioid prescribing would be associated with a decrease in prescribing at hospital discharge for EGS patients without increasing additional postdischarge refills. MethodsThis was a quasi-experimental study evaluating opioid prescribing by EGS providers before and after the implementation of a prescribing guideline. Patients were assigned to preguideline and postguideline groups based on admission date surrounding the implementation of the guideline. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving an opioid prescription for ≥50 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) per day on hospital discharge. ResultsThere were 227 patients in the preguideline group and 226 patients in the postguideline group. After guideline implementation, median total MME prescribed decreased from 113 (interquartile range = 75) to 75 (interquartile range = 75, P = 0.03). The proportion of patients receiving a prescription for daily MME ≥50 also decreased from 75% to 25% (P ≤0.01). There were no increases in requested refills (17% versus 16%, P = 0.72) or received refills (14% versus 14%, P = 0.98). Guideline compliance ranged from 75% in ventral hernia repair patients to 94% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. ConclusionsA departmental guideline to standardize postoperative opioid prescriptions was associated with a decrease in the amount of MMEs prescribed to EGS patients without an increase in requested or received refills.

High-Dose Opioid Administration Among Inpatients with Cellulitis: A Brief Report

Clinical practice guidelines recommend administering <90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per 24-hour period for safety. Several evidence-based opioid stewardship activities were implemented in 2 hospitals to reduce high-dose opioid administration, and the impact was retrospectively evaluated among patients treated for cellulitis. High-dose opioid administration significantly decreased after the interventions (P < .001). Factors influencing high-dose opioid administration for cellulitis were higher average pain score, longer length of stay, prehospital opioid prescription, younger age, and earlier year of hospitalization. Clinicians should act to minimize high-dose opioid administration among those with increased risks for this outcome and be apprised of daily MME doses.

Opiate use after total hip arthroplasty for metastatic bone disease.

e24132 Background: Metastatic bone disease (MBD) commonly affects the hip and surgical intervention including total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be indicated for pain relief or to improve function. Following THA, patients are often prescribed short courses of opioids for postoperative pain relief. This study investigated postoperative opioid use following THA in MBD patients. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients using opioids preoperatively who underwent THA for MBD at two institutions between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative and postoperative opioid usage at 6 weeks and 90 days were quantified through calculating daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and compared using the sign test. Results: Nineteen primary THA and 11 THA with complex acetabular reconstruction were included. At six weeks, 26 (86.7%) patients were utilizing opiates and at ninety days 23 (76.7%) patients were utilizing opiates. There was a statistically significant difference between median daily preoperative MME compared to daily MME at ninety days (p &lt; 0.001). The only statistically significant association with opioid use at 90 days was opioid use at 6 weeks. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first paper evaluating postoperative opioid use following primary THA in MBD patients. After THA in the setting of MBD, patients exhibit decreased postoperative opioid use.[Table: see text]

Prevalence and Predictors of Long-term Opioid Use After Pelvic Fractures.

Opioids are effective in short-term pain treatment; however, their long-term effectiveness is unconfirmed. Many patients are exposed to opioids after pelvic injuries with little known about persistent use afterward. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of long-term opioid use following pelvic fractures. This retrospective study enrolled 277 patients with acute pelvic fractures over five years. Daily and total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were calculated. The primary outcome was long-term opioid use (LOU) defined as ongoing opioid use 60-90days post-discharge. The secondary outcome was intermediate-term opioid use (IOU) defined as ongoing opioid use 30-60days post-discharge. Univariable and logistic regression analyses were performed. Median (interquartile range) total inpatient opioid MME was 422 (157-1667) with a median daily MME of 69 (26-145). Long-term opioid use occurred in 16%, and IOU occurred in 29%. Univariable analysis found that total and daily inpatient opioid use were each significantly associated with LOU (median MME, 1241 vs 371; median MMEs, 127.7 vs 59.2, respectively) and IOU (median MME, 1140 vs 326; median MMEs, 111.8 vs 57.9, respectively). Logistic regression analysis found daily inpatient MME ≥50 (odds ratio [OR] 3.027, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.059-8.652]) and pelvic fracture type (Tile B/C) (OR 2.992 [CI 1.324-6.763])were independent predictors of LOU. Total and daily inpatient opioid use were significantly associated with LOU and IOU. Patients who received ≥50 MME/inpatient day had a higher likelihood of LOU. This study seeks to inform clinical decisions for pain management to prevent adverse outcomes.

Mapping prescription drug monitoring program data to self-report measures of non-medical prescription opioid use in community pharmacy settings

BackgroundCommunity pharmacists are well-positioned to identify patients engaged in non-medical prescription opioid use (NMPOU) through Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) databases. Integrating patient-reported outcomes with PDMP data may improve the interpretability of PDMP information to support clinical decision-making. ObjectiveThis study linked patient-reported clinical measures of substance use with PDMP data to examine relationships between average daily opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and visits to multiple pharmacies/prescribers with self-reported NMPOU. MethodsData from a cross-sectional health assessment given to patients aged ≥18 years filling opioid prescriptions were linked to PDMP records. NMPOU in the past three months was assessed on a continuous scale (range 0–39) using an adapted version of the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). PDMP measures included average daily MME and number of distinct pharmacies/prescribers visited in the past 180 days. Univariable and multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial models estimated associations between PDMP measures and any NMPOU and severity of use. ResultsThe sample included 1421 participants. In multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic, mental health, and physical health characteristics, any NMPOU was associated with higher average daily MME (adjusted OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05–1.39) and number of distinct prescribers visited (adjusted OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01–1.30). Higher average daily MME (adjusted mean ratio (MR) = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.08–1.15), number of distinct pharmacies visited (adjusted MR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04–1.18), and number of distinct prescribers visited (adjusted MR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02–1.11) were associated with increased NMPOU severity. ConclusionsWe observed significant, positive associations between average daily MME and visits to multiple pharmacies/prescribers with any NMPOU and severity of use. This study demonstrates self-report clinical measures of substance use can be cross-walked to PDMP data and translated into clinically interpretable information.

New legislation in New Jersey reduced opioid use among trauma patients.

In New Jersey, politicians have emphasized the need to attenuate the ongoing opioid epidemic as opioid use disorder can lead to addiction and, in many cases, mortality. New legislation (New Jersey Senate Bill 3) was enacted in 2017 to reduce opioid prescription from 30 days to 5 days for acute pain in both inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings. Therefore, we sought to evaluate if the enactment of the bill influenced the consumption of opioid pain medication at an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I Trauma Center. Patients from 2016 to 2018 were compared for differences in average daily inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumption and injury severity score (ISS), among other parameters. To ensure that changes in pain medication did not affect the quality of pain management, we compared their average pain ratings. Although the average ISS in 2018 was higher than that in 2016 (10.6 ± 0.2 vs 9.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.001), opioid consumption decreased in 2018 without increasing the average pain rating for patients with an ISS of 9 and 10. More specifically, the average daily inpatient MMEs consumption dropped from 14.1 ± 0.5 in 2016 to 8.8 ± 0.3 in 2018 (p < 0.001). Even among patients with an average ISS >15, the total MMEs consumed per person decreased in 2018 (116.0 ± 14.0 vs 59.4 ± 7.6, p < 0.001). Overall, opioid consumption was lower in 2018 without negatively affecting the quality of pain management. This suggests that the implementation of the new legislation has successfully reduced inpatient opioid use.

Opioid Usage in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Nonsurgical, Early Surgical, and Late Surgical Treatments

To assess opioid usage in surgical and nonsurgical patients with lumbar disc herniation receiving different treatments and timing of treatments. Individuals with newly diagnosed lumbar intervertebral disc herniation without myelopathy were queried from a health claims database. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts: nonsurgical, early surgery, and late surgery. Early surgery cohort patients underwent surgery within 30 days postdiagnosis; late surgery cohort patients had surgery after 30 days but before 1 year postdiagnosis. The index date was defined as the diagnosis date for nonsurgical patients and the initial surgery date for surgical patients. The primary outcome was the average daily opioid morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed. Additional outcomes included percentage of opioid-using patients and cumulative opioid burden. Inclusion criteria were met by 573,082 patients: 533,226 patients received nonsurgical treatments, 22,312 patients received early surgery, and 17,544 patients received late surgery. Both surgical cohorts experienced a postsurgical increase in opioid usage, which then sharply declined and gradually plateaued, with daily opioid MME consistently lower in the early versus late surgery cohort. The early surgery cohort also consistently had a lower prevalence of opioid-using patients than the late surgery cohort. Patients receiving nonsurgical treatment demonstrated the highest 1-year post index cumulative opioid burden, and the early surgery cohort consistently had lower cumulative opioid MME than the late surgery cohort. Early surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation is associated with lower long-term average daily MME, incidence of opioid use, and 1-year cumulative MME burden compared with nonsurgical and late surgery treatment approaches.

Impact of Implementing Screening and Interventions to Target Prevention of Opioid Misuse and Accidental Overdose in the Inpatient Setting

Introduction: There are limited publications supporting the use of screening tools to implement upstream prevention of opioid-related problems. Opioid and Naloxone Education (ONE) is utilized in outpatient pharmacies to screen and identify patients at risk of opioid-related problems and make interventions. Objectives: To implement ONE in the inpatient setting to promote prevention of opioid-related problems and overdose risk mitigation. Methods: For this pilot, ONE screening tool was completed via chart review and patient interview for inpatients prescribed an opioid. Risk scores were calculated and recommendations were provided. Outcomes evaluated included morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prior to hospitalization, inpatient screening pre-, post-, and at discharge; naloxone orders at discharge; and comparison of overdose risk from different sources. Results: The control group (n = 44) had a mean MME decrease of 1.5, and following implementation of pharmacist interventions, the experimental group (n = 45) observed a mean MME decrease of 28.6 (P = .0001). For the threshold of 50 MME, 8.6% of patients in the control group had a change from >50 MME to <50 MME at 24 hour follow up. This change occurred in 29% of patients in the experimental group (P = .03). For non-opioid analgesics, 6.8% of patients in the control group had non-opioid analgesic orders added or increased compared to 26.6% in the experimental group (P = .01). Conclusion: Screening for opioid misuse and accidental overdose risk appears impactful in the inpatient setting. Screening and appropriate risk-based intervention was associated with decreases in total daily MME and increased non-opioid analgesics.

Real-world patterns of opioid therapy initiation in Spain, 2012–2018: A population-based, retrospective cohort study with 957,080 patients and 1,509,488 initiations

Introduction: Europe has seen a steady increase in the use of prescription opioids, especially in non-cancer indications. Epidemiological data on the patterns of use of opioids is required to optimize prescription. We aim to describe the patterns of opioid therapy initiation for non-cancer pain and characteristics of patients treated in a region with five million inhabitants in the period 2012 to 2018. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult patients initiating opioid therapy for non-cancer pain in the region of Valencia. We described patient characteristics at baseline and the characteristics of baseline and subsequent treatment initiation. We used multinominal regression models to identify individual factors associated with initiation. Results: A total of 957,080 patients initiated 1,509,488 opioid treatments (957,080 baseline initiations, 552,408 subsequent initiations). For baseline initiations, 738,749 were with tramadol (77.19%), 157,098 with codeine (16.41%) 58,436 (6.11%) with long-acting opioids, 1,518 (0.16%) with short-acting opioids and 1,279 (0.13%) with ultrafast drugs. When compared to tramadol, patients initiating with short-acting, long-acting and ultrafast opioids were more likely to be older and had more comorbidities, whereas initiators with codeine were more prone to be healthier and younger. Treatments lasting less than 7 days accounted for 41.82% of initiations, and 11.89% lasted more than 30days. 19.55% of initiators with ultrafast fentanyl received more than 120 daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME), and 16.12% of patients initiating with long-acting opioids were prescribed more than 90 daily MME (p < 0.001). Musculoskeletal indications accounted for 65.05% of opioid use. Overlap with benzodiazepines was observed in 24.73% of initiations, overlap with gabapentinoids was present in 11.04% of initiations with long-acting opioids and 28.39% of initiators with short-acting opioids used antipsychotics concomitantly. In subsequent initiations, 55.48% of treatments included three or more prescriptions (vs. 17.60% in baseline initiations) and risk of overlap was also increased. Conclusion: Opioids are initiated for a vast array of non-oncological indications, and, despite clinical guidelines, short-acting opioids are used marginally, and a significant number of patients is exposed to potentially high-risk patterns of initiation, such as treatments lasting more than 14 days, treatments surpassing 50 daily MMEs, initiating with long-acting opioids, or hazardous overlapping with other therapies.

Age-related Impact of the CDC's 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain on Opioid Prescribing Levels and Health Outcomes among the Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

INTRODUCTON: The Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain instituted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2016 has been found to be effective in decreasing opioid use. However, this decrease has included patient groups that fall outside of the intended scope of the guideline such as patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who already experience difficulty accessing needed pain management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CDC's 2016 Opioid Guideline on opioid prescribing level and health outcomes among patients with SCD. Because patients with SCD may experience different symptoms and complications as they age, the consequences were assessed by age group. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study employed an interrupted time series analysis using the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database from 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2019. The study population included individuals ≥1 years old who had ≥3 SCD diagnosis codes within 5 years and had no cancer diagnosis. Monthly-measured opioid prescribing levels included: opioid prescription rate, mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per prescription, and mean number of days supplied per prescription. Health outcomes included: monthly rates of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC)-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, and monthly rates of healthcare facility visits related to opioid use disorder (OUD), depression, and anxiety. Segmented regressions (breakpoint: March 2016) were conducted for all outcomes to compare trends before and after the guideline release. RESULTS: The study included 14,979 SCD patients (1-65 years old, mean [SD] age = 25.9 [16.9], 56.9% female). After the guideline release, compared to the pre-guideline period, 1) children (1-12 years; N=3,916 [26.4%]) experienced significant decreases in the opioid prescription rate (-0.09 prescription/100 person-month, p=0.001), mean daily MME per prescription (-1.02 MME/month, p=0.001) and the number of days supplied per prescription (-0.02 days/month, p=0.009), but a significant increase in the VOC-related hospitalization rate (+0.11 hospitalizations/100 person-month, p=0.021); 2) adolescents (13-18 years; N=1,782 [11.9%]) experienced significant decreases in the mean daily MME per prescription (-8.48 MME/month, p=0.012) and the number of days supplied (-0.03 days/month, p=0.003), but an increase in the VOC-related hospitalization rate (+0.21 hospitalizations/100 person-month, p=0.003); 3) young adults (19-27 years; N=2,599 [17.4%]) experienced a significant decrease in the number of days supply (-0.04 days/month, P<0.001), and no significant change in the VOC-related outcomes; 4) adults 28-45 years (N=4,293 [28.7%]) experienced significant decreases in opioid prescription rate (-0.48 prescription/100 person-month, p<0.001), mean daily MME per prescription (-21.19 MME/month, p<0.001), and the number of days supplied (-0.06 days/month, p<0.001), but significant increases in VOC-related ED visit rate (+0.13 visits/month, p<0.001) and hospitalization rate (+0.30 hospitalizations/100 person-month, p<0.001); and 5) adults 46-65 years (N=2,344 [15.6%]) experienced significant decreases in the opioid prescription rate (-0.55 prescription/100 person-month, p<0.001), mean daily MME per prescription (-3.68 MME/month, p<0.001), the number of days supplied (-0.03 days/month, p=0.003), and VOC-related ED visit rate (-0.1 visits/100 person-months, p=0.023). OUD-related healthcare facility visits did not differ in either pediatric (1-18 years) or adult (19-65 years) patients before vs. after the guideline release. Depression-related visits increased significantly (+0.09 visits/100 person-months, p=0.002) among adult patients while anxiety-related visits decreased significantly (-0.05 visits/100 person-months, p=0.023) among the same population post-guideline compared to the pre-guideline periods. CONCLUSIONS: The CDC guideline release was associated with a decrease in opioid prescribing levels across all age groups even though the guideline was intended only for the adult population. Overall, pain-related health outcomes were negatively impacted by the guideline: older age groups with increased ED visits and younger age groups with increased hospitalizations, while there were no decreases in the rate of OUD. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

LBSAT59 Overnight Metyrapone Test And Urine Steroid Profiling In Patients Treated With Chronic Opioid Therapy: Prevalence Of Adrenal Insufficiency

Abstract Background Patients taking chronic opioids are at high risk of opioid induced adrenal insufficiency (OIAI). Previously, we showed that the prevalence of OIAI was 9% based on low morning cortisol, corticotropin (ACTH), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). Data on the overnight metyrapone test to diagnose OIAI are sparse. We aimed to determine the prevalence of OIAI using overnight metyrapone test and identify changes in the steroid metabolome of patients treated with opioids. Methods Cross-sectional study of adult patients treated with opioid therapy of at least 20 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day for at least 3 months. Measurements included ACTH, cortisol, and DHEAS. Overnight metyrapone test was administered in all patients, and 24h urine steroid profiling was optional (25 steroids measured by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry1). All patients completed the quality-of-life survey (AddiQoL). Prevalence of OIAI was defined as sum of post-metyrapone 11-deoxycortisol and cortisol of &amp;lt;15 mcg/dL. Result: In 22 patients (median age 59 years [range, 38-74], 9, 41% women), median MME was 33 (20-161) mg, and median cumulative opioid exposure was 245 (10-2550) mg*years. Following the overnight metyrapone test, 7 (32%) patients were diagnosed with OIAI. Patients with OIAI had lower DHEAS concentrations (median of 21 mcg/dL[ 5-113] vs 54 [22-173], p =0. 03), but not cortisol (median 10[5.3-16] mcg/dL vs 13[5.3-22], p=0. 06) or ACTH (median 27[8.1-51] pg/mL vs 26[5.9-55], p=0.8). Patients with OIAI were treated with higher daily MME (100 mg[30-150] vs 30[20-161], p=0. 03) and had a higher cumulative exposure to opioids (median, 660 mg*years [250-2250] vs 150 [10-1288], p =0. 01). AddiQol scores were similar between groups (median of 68[56-84] vs 73[48-83], p= 0.97). Urine steroid profiling was performed in 18 patients. Patients with OIAI demonstrated 4 times lower total urine glucocorticoids (16334 mcg/24h vs 4377 mcg/24h, p=0. 003), all &amp;lt;10% of the reference range, and 3 times lower total urinary androgens (median of 805 mcg/24h vs 2320 mcg/24h, p=0.14). Conclusion Prevalence of OIAI using overnight metyrapone test is high at 32%. Patients diagnosed with OIAI were treated with higher doses of MME/day and had a higher cumulative exposure to opioids when compared to those without OIAI. Applying 24h urine steroid profiling we showed that total glucocorticoids are 4 times lower in those with OIAI (and all &amp;lt;10% of reference ranges) as opposed to those without OIAI. We showed that baseline measurements of ACTH, DHEAS, and cortisol may incorrectly exclude OIAI, and a dynamic test, such as overnight metyrapone test is needed when suspicion for OIAI is high. | 1. Hines JM, Bancos I, Bancos C, et al. High-Resolution, Accurate-Mass (HRAM) Mass Spectrometry Urine Steroid Profiling in the Diagnosis of Adrenal Disorders. Clin Chem. 2017;63(12): 1824-1835. Presentation: Saturday, June 11, 2022 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on opioid prescribing for patients with pleuritic pain.

We sought to understand opioid prescribing for COVID-19 positive and negative patients with pleuritic pain during the first wave of the pandemic. We hypothesized that patients without COVID-19 would be prescribed opioids more frequently intrapandemic compared to prepandemic and postulated that COVID-19 patients would be prescribed opioids more frequently and at greater quantity than their peers. A retrospective observational analysis of electronic health record data. A quaternary academic hospital from February through April 2020. A total of 1,400 of 3,169 adult inpatient hospitalizations involving pleuritic pain were included. Frequency and average daily dose of opioid prescriptions were analyzed using logistic and linear regression. Opioid prescribing habits were compared pre- and intrapandemic. Hypotheses and primary outcome measures were formulated prior to data collection. During the pandemic, COVID-19 patients were 15.77 absolute percentage points less likely to be prescribed opioids compared to patients without COVID-19 (95 percent confidence interval (CI): -8.98 to -22.56 percent). Patients without COVID-19 were equally likely to be prescribed opioids pre- and intrapandemic (95 percent CI: -9.37 to 2.42 percent). Odds ratio of opioid prescription for COVID-19 patients was 0.44 (95 percent CI: 0.08-0.80). Within those given opioids, COVID-19 patients were prescribed 3.0 percent greater morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (95 percent CI: 1.07-5.85 percent). During the first wave of the pandemic, COVID-19 patients with pleuritic pain were prescribed opioids less frequently than patients without COVID-19, while patients without COVID-19 were equally likely to be prescribed opioid pre- and intrapandemic. On the other hand, COVID-19 patients treated with opioids were given greater daily MMEs due to the greater utilization of opioid infusions.