Daily Chest X-ray Research Articles

Chest ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery: a comparative study

BackgroundPatients who underwent thoracic surgery procedures were usually subjected to daily chest X-rays until discharge, exposing patients to ionizing radiation and requiring patient movement with chest drains, difficult positioning, and time-consuming. Unlike chest ultrasound, which is a good alternative because it is bedside and accurate in the detection of pulmonary complications. We hypothesize that a thoracic surgery resident with a short training program in chest ultrasound can achieve comparable results to a chest X-ray. Our study aims to analyze the agreement between the two techniques.ResultsThis is an observational prospective study. Eighty-six adult patients who underwent thoracic surgery were included. Every patient had a chest X-ray and chest ultrasound follow-up on day 0, day 3, and day 5 post-operative. Chest ultrasound examinations were performed by the same resident, and the results were revised by an expert sonographer for the detection of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary consolidation, and interstitial pattern. Both diagnostic procedures showed substantial agreement for pneumothorax (K = 0.661). For pleural effusion, they showed moderate agreement (K = 0.448, P < 0.001), and no cases developed an interstitial pattern. Overall, both diagnostic procedures showed perfect agreement (K = 0.838, P < 0.001). The time lag to perform a chest ultrasound was statistically lower than that to perform. chest X-ray, with a median of 7 min versus 80 min, respectively.ConclusionsPerforming chest ultrasound by a thoracic surgery resident is a less time-consuming and easy bedside diagnostic tool. Compared chest ultrasound to the postoperative X-ray showed a perfect diagnostic agreement for pulmonary consolidation and moderate agreement for pleural effusion and pneumothorax.Trial registrationNCT04118621

Effect of Active Physiotherapy With Positive Airway Pressure on Pulmonary Atelectasis After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

The authors investigated the effect of active work with positive airway pressure (PAP) in addition to chest physiotherapy (CP) on pulmonary atelectasis (PA) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. A randomized controlled study. At a single-center tertiary hospital. Eighty adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or both), and presenting with PA after tracheal extubation on postoperative days 1 or 2, were randomized from November 2014 to September 2016. Three days of CP, twice daily, associated with active work with PAP effect (intervention group) versus CP alone (control group). Pulmonary atelectasis was assessed by using the radiologic atelectasis score (RAS) measured from daily chest x-rays. All radiographs were reviewed blindly. Among included patients, 79 (99%) completed the trial. The primary outcome was mean RAS on day 2 after inclusion. It was significantly lower in the intervention group (mean difference and 95% CI: -1.1 [-1.6 to -0.6], p < 0.001). The secondary outcomes were the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure measured before and after CP and clinical variables. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure was significantly higher in the intervention group on day 2 (7.7 [3.0-12.5] cmH2O, p=0.002). The respiratory rate was lower in the intervention group (-3.2 [95% CI -4.8 to -1.6] breaths/min, p < 0.001) on day 2. No differences were found between the 2 groups for percutaneous oxygen saturation/oxygen requirement ratio, heart rate, pain, and dyspnea scores. Active work with the PAP effect, combined with CP, significantly decreased the RAS of patients undergoing cardiac surgery after 2 days of CP, with no differences observed in clinically relevant parameters.

Ambulation of Patients With In Situ Femoral Intraaortic Balloon Pump While Awaiting Heart Transplantation.

Ambulation of Patients With In Situ Femoral Intraaortic Balloon Pump While Awaiting Heart Transplantation.

Utility of High Flow Nasal Oxygen versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia: Retrospective Comparative Analysis and Assessment in Present Scenario Patients

Background: The pandemic of COVID-19 since its beginning has created havoc all-round the globe. The role of oxygen therapy remains constant. Various modalities have been studied for oxygen delivery to hypoxic patients but high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has lately gained importance in terms of non-invasive oxygen delivery, easy administration and great improvement in patient’s recovery. We conducted this retrospective analysis with the primary objective of looking for the proportion of patients who were successfully weaned off of HFNO or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and the secondary aim was to look for duration of hospital stay and its effect on clinical recovery based on laboratory parameters.&#x0D; Methods: All patients, positive for COVID-19 infection by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) were admitted to covid ICU or ward with oxygen requirement and were treated with either NIV or HFNO were enrolled for the study. Patients were grouped under H group (HFNO) or N group (NIV). Daily ABG readings, chest x-ray, respiratory rate, hemodynamic parameters and urine output were noted on 12 hourly intervals. Any changes in above parameters along with need for intubation were assessed.&#x0D; Results: Patients from both the groups showed significant improvement in their oxygen saturation by the fifth day of their treatment. Fourteen patients from the NIV group and 10 from the HFNO group had saturation &gt;90% by Day 5. Of those who presented with saturation of &lt;85%, 2 out of 5 in the NIV group (40%) and 1 of the 2 patients in the HFNO group (50%) showed improvement in their oxygen saturation. The P/F was statistically comparable (p 0.928) in both groups. The levels of bio markers, and the improvement was comparable and correlated with clinical improvement as well.&#x0D; Conclusion: We conclude that though HFNO is accepted better than NIV, the improvement in the respiratory status of the patient was comparable with both the treatment modalities and hence we do not recommend use of HFNO, especially in a situation of gross deficit of oxygen availability as compared to the exponential rise in the demand.

Utility of the serial portable chest x-ray for the diagnosis and quantification of COVID-19 patients

ObjectiveTo determine the role of the serial portable chest X-ray in the diagnosis and quantification of patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary care hospital. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted at Dow Institute of Radiology, Dow University of Health Sciences. Confirmed positive cases of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 were retrospectively studied. Patients' demographics and clinical characteristics, chest X-ray findings, and outcomes were retrieved through electronic medical records. Baseline and final follow-up chest X-rays findings were compared by using chest X-ray severity score. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patients’ characteristics and patient outcomes. ResultsThe study included 329 patients with a mean age of 56.43 ± 13.10 years (range 16–85 years). Peripheral consolidation and ground glass opacities (89.4%) were the most common X-ray findings followed by bilateral lung involvement (79.0%) and perihilar consolidation/ground glass opacities (69.9%). Among the patients who were admitted, 61.4% were discharged, 49.5% had prolonged length of stay ≥10 days, and 37.7% died. After adjustment of all patients' characteristics, the multivariate model showed no significant difference in chest X-ray severity score in relation to the patient's outcome. Patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit, and received oxygen support, bilevel positive airway pressure, and a ventilator were significantly associated with the outcome of being discharged, prolonged hospital stay, and death. ConclusionPeripheral consolidation and ground glass opacities were the most common chest X-ray findings in admitted COVID-19 patients. No significant difference in chest X-ray severity score was noted in the primary outcome of being discharged, prolonged hospital stay, and death. There is no requirement for daily chest X-rays in hospitalized patients until required in the condition of worsening symptoms or significant intervention such as endotracheal intubation.

Evaluation of the Daily Change in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio as a Predictor of Abnormal Chest X-rays in Intensive Care Unit Patients Post Mechanical Ventilation Weaning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: The routine daily chest X-ray (CXR) strategy is no longer recommended in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, it is difficult for intensivists to collectively accept the on-demand CXR strategy because of the ambiguous clinical criteria for conducting CXRs. This study evaluated the predictive value of the change in PaO2/FiO2 (PF ratio) for abnormal CXR findings in ICU patients after mechanical ventilation (MV). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2016 and March 2021 on ICU patients with MV who had at least 48 h of MV, and stayed at least 72 h in the ICU post-MV. Routine daily CXRs and daily changes in the PF ratios were investigated during the three days post-MV. Results: The 186 patients included in the study had a median age of 77 years (interquartile range: 65–82), and 116 (62.4%) were men. One hundred and eight (58.1%) patients had abnormal CXR findings, defined as one or more abnormal CXRs among the daily CXRs during the three days post-extubation. The reintubation rate was higher in the abnormal CXR group (p = 0.01). Of the 558 CXRs (normal = 418, abnormal = 140) and PF ratios, the daily change in PF ratio had a significant predictive accuracy for abnormal CXR findings (AUROC = 0.741, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The change in PF ratio (the Youden index point: ≤−23) had a sensitivity of 65.7%, and a specificity of 79.9%. Based on these results, the daily change in the PF ratio could be utilized as a predictive indicator of abnormal CXRs in ICU patients after MV treatment.

Exploring the Necessity of Routine Daily Chest X-rays for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review

ProblemIn the PICU of a university teaching hospital, daily chest X-rays (CXR) are performed on all intubated and non-invasive ventilation-assisted patients, even when the patient is stable with no changes in clinical status. Inconsistent practice was identified with PICUs globally. This review aims to address the risk-benefit balance of clinical value, outcomes, cost, and radiation exposure when performing routine daily CXRs in the PICU. Eligibility criteriaCINAHL, Medline, and Embase (Ovid) were searched for relevant articles within the last ten years (2009 to 2019). Articles involving routine daily CXR on adult patients were included due to limited pediatric research. Sample18 articles were included in this review which evaluated the necessity of routine daily CXR protocol in the ICU setting and the risks of radiation exposure (pediatric n = 5, adult n = 10, both n = 3). ResultsWhen comparing the routine daily to on-demand CXR ordering protocols, there was no difference noted in clinical outcomes including mortality, complications, length of stay in hospital or ICU, and number of ventilator days. The on-demand CXR protocol decreased the number of CXRs per patient, which thereby decreased radiation exposure for patients, decreasing their risk of potential toxicity and malignancy. ConclusionRoutine daily CXR protocols are no longer recommended due to lack of clinical value, similar outcomes, increased cost, and since it places patients at risk for undue radiation exposure. ImplicationsFurther studies should evaluate clinical and physical exam findings that would trigger ordering a CXR in order to optimize their diagnostic value in the pediatric setting.

Daily Bedside Chest X-Rays in the Critical Care Setting : Accuracy of Fellow Interpretation

Daily Bedside Chest X-Rays in the Critical Care Setting : Accuracy of Fellow Interpretation

COVID-19 ventilator barotrauma management: less is more

BackgroundCOVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation may develop significant pneumomediastinum and sub-cutaneous emphysema without associated pneumothorax (SWAP). Prophylactic chest tube placement or sub-fascial “blowholes” are usually recommended to prevent tension pneumothorax and clinical decline. Risk of iatrogenic lung injury and release of virus into the environment is high. Incidence and conservative management data of such barotraumatic complications during the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking.MethodsAll patients with mediastinal air and SWAP evaluated by the department of Thoracic Surgery at the Mount Sinai Hospital between March 30 and April 10, 2020 were identified. All patients without pneumothorax were treated conservatively with daily chest x-ray and observation. Three patients had prophylactic chest tube placement prior to the study period without thoracic surgery consultation.ResultsThere were 29 cases of mediastinal air with SWAP out of 171 COVID positive intubated patients (17.0%) who were treated conservatively. Patients were intubated for an average of 2.4 days before SWAP was identified. 12 patients (41%) had improvement or resolution without intervention. Two patients progressed to pneumothorax 3 and 8 days following initial presentation. Both had chest tubes placed without incident before there were any changes in oxygenation, hemodynamics, supportive medications, or ventilator settings. There were 3 patients who had percutaneous tubes placed before the study period all of whom had significant worsening of their sub-cutaneous air and air leak.ConclusionsConservative management of massive sub-cutaneous emphysema without pneumothorax in COVID-19 patients is safe and limits viral exposure to healthcare workers. Placement of chest tubes is discouraged unless a definite sizable pneumothorax develops.

Lung Ultrasound as a Bedside Tool for Assessment of Extravascular Lung Water in Critically Ill Head Injured Patients: An Observational Study.

ABSTRACTIntroductionExtra vascular lung water (EVLW) is defined as the amount of fluid in the interstitial and alveolar spaces. Primary aim of this study was to assess EVLW using lung USG (B lines >3 per lung field) in critically ill head injured patients.Materials and methodsIntubated adult patients admitted in Trauma ICU with head injury (GCS 4-15) were assessed by daily chest X-ray and lung ultrasonography. Lung water content was graded based on the number of B lines per ICS with score ranging from 0-32 and categorized as low pulmonary fluid burden (0-10), moderate fluid burden (11-20) and high fluid burden (21-32).Results140 critically ill head injured patients were assessed for eligibility and 20 excluded. Incidence of increased EVLW using lung USG was 61.66% (74/120) and the incidence reported using chest x ray was 40.83%(49/120) and the difference was statistically significant (p value <0.001). Increased EVLW significantly increased the duration of weaning, mechanical ventilation and ICU stay (p value <0.05). Significant association was observed between APACHE II, SAPS II and GCS at admission to ICU with presence of EVLW (p value ≤0.001). Mean delay in identification of EVLW by chest X-ray (CXR) compared to lung ultrasound was 1.42±0.76 days.ConclusionLung ultrasound is better than CXR for early detection of increased EVLW in critically ill head injured patients and has prognostic relevance as increased EVLW prolongs duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.How to cite this articleGattupalli V, Jain K, et al. Lung Ultrasound as a Bedside Tool for Assessment of Extravascular Lung Water in Critically Ill Head Injured Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(3):131-134.

Initiation and Compliance with a Chest X-Ray (CXR) Reduction Protocol in the Children's National Medical Center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

Background: Daily chest X-rays (CXR)s for the sole purpose of verifying the position of the endotracheal tube (ETT) have been deemed by the American Academy of Pediatrics to be one of the top 5 unnecessary tests that increase cost and utilize resources but do not increase efficacy nor safety. Restricting the frequency of CXRs is not associated with an increase in hospital mortality, increased length of stay, nor an increase in duration of mechanical ventilation. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a restrictive CXR protocol in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) by assessing …

(73) Examining the incidence of critical findings in intubated patients receiving routine daily chest x-rays in a pediatric intensive care unit

(73) Examining the incidence of critical findings in intubated patients receiving routine daily chest x-rays in a pediatric intensive care unit

(72) Examining the cost of the routine daily chest x-ray and identifying opportunities to limit redundancy in a pediatric ICU

(72) Examining the cost of the routine daily chest x-ray and identifying opportunities to limit redundancy in a pediatric ICU

(72) Examining the cost of the routine daily chest x-ray and identifying opportunities to limit redundancy in a pediatric ICU

Purpose: It is standard practice in our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit to perform routine daily chest x-rays on intubated patients. Recent recommendations by the American Thoracic Society suggest that that this practice does not benefit patients and leads to over-utilization of medical resources. The present study represents preliminary data concerning chest x-ray utilization in our unit, which was collected as part of a larger study investigating the role of bedside lung ultrasound for serial monitoring of lung pathology in pediatric patients. Methods: The data were collected from a 20-bed …

Daily routine versus\xa0on-demand chest radiograph policy\xa0and practice in adult ICU patients- clinicians\u2019 perspective

BackgroundChest radiographs are taken daily as a part of routine investigations in Intensive care unit (ICU) patients. They are less effective and unlikely to alter the management of the majority of these patients compared to the radiographs obtained when indicated. According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness criteria, only selective ordering of chest radiographs is recommended, including elderly or high risk patients. The aim of this study was to identify and assess the clinician’s perspective in abandoning the current practice of daily routine chest radiograph and replacing with the on-demand radiograph in Saudi hospitals.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. A valid self-administered questionnaire was distributed to all clinical staff members working in ICUs in the major tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study population was primarily the ICU intensivists (physicians), nurses and respiratory therapists (RT). The data collected were statistically processed using SPSS version 20.0; descriptive and inferential analyses were done.ResultsOut of 730 questionnaires sent, we received only 495 completed questionnaires with a response rate of 67.8%. Majority of them (n = 351) are working at academic hospitals. About half of the respondents (n = 247) are working in an open-format ICUs. Findings showed that the daily routine chest X-ray was performed in almost 96.8% of ICUs patients, which the majority of the clinical staff members (73%) thought that this current daily routine CXR protocol in the ICUs should be replaced with the on-demand CXR policy. Interestingly, the differences in demographic and work-related characteristics had no significant impact on the clinician’s view and supported moving to on-demand CXR policy and practice.ConclusionsThe daily routine CXR is still a common practice in most of the Saudi hospitals ICUs although enough empirical evidence shows that it can be avoided. We observed that intensivists support the change of the current practice and recommend an on-demand CXR policy likely to be followed in intensive care management.

Avalon catheters in pediatric patients requiring ECMO: Placement and migration problems

PurposeThe Avalon dual-lumen venovenous catheter has several advantages, but placement techniques and management have not been adequately addressed in the pediatric population. We assessed our institutional outcomes and complications using the Avalon catheter in children. MethodsWe reviewed all pediatric patients who had Avalon catheters placed for respiratory failure at our institution, excluding congenital heart disease patients, from April 2009 to March 2016. All patients were managed using our standard ECMO protocol, and cannula position was followed by daily chest x-ray and intermittent echocardiography (ECHO). Data included demographics, diagnosis, PRISM3 predicted mortality, ECMO duration, complications, and survival. The primary outcome was the need for catheter repositioning. ResultsTwenty-five patients were included, with mean age 8.3±6.9years and 15±22days of ECMO support. Overall survival was 68% (17/25). Fourteen patients (56%) underwent placement with fluoroscopy in addition to ultrasound and ECHO, primarily after 2013. Overall, thirteen patients (52%) had problems with cannula malposition. 9 of these (69%) required cannula repositioning. Three of 14 (21%) cannulas placed with fluoroscopy required repositioning, compared to 7/11 (64%) placed without fluoroscopy (p=0.05). ConclusionsComplications are common with the Avalon catheter in children. Safe percutaneous access requires ultrasound guidance, and use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in addition to echocardiography decreases malposition rates. Level of evidenceIV (Prognosis study).

Clinical relevance of the routine daily chest X-Ray in the surgical intensive care unit

IntroductionA daily Chest X-ray (CXR) is obtained in many surgical intensive care units (SICU). This study implemented a selective CXR protocol in a high volume, academic SICU and evaluated its impact on clinical outcomes. MethodsAll SICU patients admitted in 2/2010 were compared with patients admitted in 2/2012. Between the time periods, a protocol eliminating the routine daily CXRs was instituted. ResultsIn 02/2010 and 02/2012, 107 and 90 patients were admitted to the SICU, respectively, for a total of 1384 patient days. CXRs decreased from 365 (57.1% of patient-days) in 2010 to 299 (40.9% of patient days; p < 0.001) in 2012. A greater proportion of Physician Directed CXRs (PDCXRs) had new findings (80.8%) compared to Automatic Daily CXRs (ADCXRs) (23.5%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall or SICU length of stay, ventilator-free days, morbidity or mortality. ConclusionEliminating ADCXRs decreased the number of CXRs performed, without affecting LOS, mechanical ventilation, morbidity or mortality. Physician-directed ordering of CXRs increased the diagnostic value of the CXR and decreased the number of clinically irrelevant CXRs performed.

Utility of daily routine portable chest X-ray in mechanically ventilated patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.

The utility of daily routine chest X-rays (CXRs) in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units is still controversial. The present study compared the diagnostic, therapeutic and outcome efficacy between daily routine and non-routine (clinically indicated) CXRs in children patients in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A prospective randomized study conducted in tertiary center 18-bed PICU, Riyadh Military Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study selected 52 children, who were mechanically intubated for at least 48 hr. The children were randomized to receive either routine (29 patients) or non-routine (23 patients) CXRs and were followed until extubation or death. Demographic and outcome data were collected and analyzed as appropriate. Although children in the non-routine group received fewer CXRs, the lengths of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit and hospital and mortality rate were nearly the same compared with routine group. The percentage of CXRs with new findings was higher in the non-routine group (83%; 53 CXRs) compared to that in the routine group (69%; 156 CXRs) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60-8.11). Also, the percentage of CXRs with new findings that result in intervention was higher in non-routine group (78% vs. 69%; OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 0.50-5.70). The daily routine CXRs was not associated with a reduced effect on length of stay in PICU and hospital or mortality and it does not seem to add any advantages over non-routine CXRs in PICU. Large multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

Could chest ultrasonography replace routine chest X-rays in mechanically ventilated patients?

BackgroundAlthough conventional chest radiography remains the first routine radiologic examination in mechanically ventilated patients, chest ultrasound provides more accurate information, with less ionizing radiation and less time delay. ObjectiveTo compare between sensitivity of chest ultrasound and routine daily chest X-ray in diagnosis and follow up of diseases in mechanically ventilated patients admitted at Respiratory ICU of the Ain Shams University Hospital. DesignThe study was carried out as a prospective analytical study. Patients and methodsThe study was conducted upon twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients (16 male patients and 9 female patients), with a mean age of 58.8years (SD±15.64) who were admitted at the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of the Ain Shams University Hospital during the period from October 2012 to May 2013. Chest ultrasound examination was done for patients on mechanical ventilation on the first day of enrollment prior to seeing their chest X-ray, then follow up daily chest ultrasound examination was done over the entire period of mechanical ventilation with comparison of examination results with that of chest X-ray. ResultsInitial chest ultrasound was more sensitive in the detection of pleural effusion (40% of cases) than chest X-ray (8% of cases). This superiority of chest ultrasound over chest X-ray persisted in follow up studies (44%, 8% respectively). As regards consolidation, there was no statistically significant difference between chest ultrasound (consolidation was detected in 16 out of 25 cases) and chest X-ray (consolidation was detected in 15 out of 25 cases) in the initial studies, and also along the follow up period, chest ultrasound detected consolidation in 17/25 patients, while CXR detected consolidation in 18/25 patients. In the follow up of five mechanically ventilated patients with no obvious radiologic abnormalities on chest X-ray, initial and follow-up ultrasound was also free and detected no localized abnormality. There was a statistically significant relationship between chest ultrasound findings in cases with pleural effusion and in cases with consolidation and clinical progress. ConclusionChest ultrasound is a reliable tool for evaluation of mechanically ventilated patients.

Surgical management for the first 48 h following blunt chest trauma: state of the art (excluding vascular injuries).

This review aims to answer the most common questions in routine surgical practice during the first 48 h of blunt chest trauma (BCT) management. Two authors identified relevant manuscripts published since January 1994 to January 2014. Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement, they focused on the surgical management of BCT, excluded both child and vascular injuries and selected 80 studies. Tension pneumothorax should be promptly diagnosed and treated by needle decompression closely followed with chest tube insertion (Grade D). All traumatic pneumothoraces are considered for chest tube insertion. However, observation is possible for selected patients with small unilateral pneumothoraces without respiratory disease or need for positive pressure ventilation (Grade C). Symptomatic traumatic haemothoraces or haemothoraces >500 ml should be treated by chest tube insertion (Grade D). Occult pneumothoraces and occult haemothoraces are managed by observation with daily chest X-rays (Grades B and C). Periprocedural antibiotics are used to prevent chest-tube-related infectious complications (Grade B). No sign of life at the initial assessment and cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration >10 min are considered as contraindications of Emergency Department Thoracotomy (Grade C). Damage Control Thoracotomy is performed for either massive air leakage or refractive shock or ongoing bleeding enhanced by chest tube output >1500 ml initially or >200 ml/h for 3 h (Grade D). In the case of haemodynamically stable patients, early video-assisted thoracic surgery is performed for retained haemothoraces (Grade B). Fixation of flail chest can be considered if mechanical ventilation for 48 h is probably required (Grade B). Fixation of sternal fractures is performed for displaced fractures with overlap or comminution, intractable pain or respiratory insufficiency (Grade D). Lung herniation, traumatic diaphragmatic rupture and pericardial rupture are life-threatening situations requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical advice. (Grades C and D). Tracheobronchial repair is mandatory in cases of tracheal tear >2 cm, oesophageal prolapse, mediastinitis or massive air leakage (Grade C). These evidence-based surgical indications for BCT management should support protocols for chest trauma management.