DAA-naive Patients Research Articles

Estimating the causal effect of treatment with direct-acting antivirals on kidney function among individuals with hepatitis C virus infection.

BackgroundDirect-acting antivirals (DAA) are highly effective at treating Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with a cure rate >95%. However, the effect of DAAs on kidney function remains debated.MethodsWe analyzed electronic health record data for DAA-naive patients with chronic HCV infection engaged in HCV care at Boston Medical Center between 2014 and 2018. We compared the following hypothetical interventions using causal inference methods: 1) initiation of DAA and 2) no DAA initiation. For patients with normal kidney function at baseline (eGFR>90 ml/min/1.73m2), we estimated and compared the risk for reaching Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR≤60 ml/min/1.73m2) under each intervention. For patients with baseline CKD Stages 2–4 (15<eGFR≤90 ml/min/1.73m2), we estimated and compared the mean change in eGFR at 2 years after baseline under each intervention. We used the parametric g-formula to adjust our estimates for baseline and time-varying confounders.ResultsFirst, among 1390 patients with normal kidney function at baseline the estimated 2-year risk difference (95% CI) of reaching Stage 3 CKD for DAA initiation versus no DAA was -1% (-3, 2). Second, among 733 patients with CKD Stage 2–4 at baseline the estimated 2-year mean difference in change in eGFR for DAA initiation versus no DAA therapy was -3 ml/min/1.73m2 (-8, 2).ConclusionsWe found no effect of DAA initiation on kidney function, independent of baseline renal status. This suggests that DAAs may not be nephrotoxic; furthermore, in the short-term, HCV clearance may not improve CKD.

Safety and efficacy of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in north Tohoku Japanese patients with genotype 1/2 hepatitis C virus infection.

Background and aimsTo assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Japanese patients with genotype (GT) 1/2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a real‐world clinical setting.MethodsA total of 230 patients from 12 centers in northern Tohoku Japan with chronic hepatitis (CH) or compensated liver cirrhosis (LC) and GT1/2 HCV infection were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and followed up for 12 weeks after treatment completion. Those patients were evaluated by dividing them into the following three groups: CH GT1/2 HCV‐infected, direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA)‐naive patients received 8 weeks of treatment (8‐week initial treatment group), compensated LC GT1/2 HCV‐infected, DAA‐naive patients received 12 weeks of treatment (12‐week initial treatment group), and GT1/2 HCV‐infected patients with previous failed DAA treatment were assigned to 12‐week treatment (12‐week re‐treatment group).ResultsThe overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate in the modified intention‐to‐treat population was 99% (222/225). The SVR rate in 8‐week initial treatment group, 12‐week initial treatment group, and 12‐week re‐treatment group were 99% (118/119), 98% (104/106), and 97% (56/58), respectively. SVR rates based on chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage were 99% in stage 1/2, 96% in stage 3, and 100% in stage 4/5 patients. SVR rate among the three treatment groups was not influenced by CKD stage. Furthermore, all 18 patients (six in the 8‐week initial treatment group, 12 in 12‐week initial treatment group) who underwent hemodialysis attained SVR. Serious treatment‐associated adverse events (grade ≥ 3) occurred in 12 patients (5.2%). Five patients (2.2%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events; however, three of these patients achieved SVR.ConclusionPrimary treatment and re‐treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are effective and safe for patients without decompensated LC and GT1/2 HCV infection in a real‐world clinical setting. Furthermore, the SVR rate was not influenced by CKD stage.

A cluster randomized controlled trial of a MedicineInsight Educational Quality Improvement Programme to improve the diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis C in general practice (the EQUIP-HEPC trial).

The availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) sparked efforts to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Australia. We evaluated whether an educational intervention of a 1-h discussion among staff using audit and feedback data from the MedicineInsight GP programme would improve DAA uptake. Of 296 eligible general practices in MedicineInsight, 11% opted out. Randomization stratified by practice caseload allocated 130 practices to the intervention arm and 129 to control. The primary outcome was the number of patients started on DAAs over 6months using the negative binomial regression model adjusted for DAA prescription history and clustering by practice. Data for analysis were available for 78% of practices, which included 101 practices and 2469 DAA-naive patients with confirmed/possible HCV in the intervention arm, and 100 practices and 2466 patients in the control arm. At baseline, 49.5% of practices had prescribed ≥1 DAA in the past year; 18.9% of HCV patients had already been treated with DAAs; the mean age of DAA-naive HCV patients was 43years old, and 57% were men. Over 6months, 43 patients in the intervention arm and 36 in the control arm started DAAs (adjusted IRR 1.19; 95% CI 0.67-2.11, p=0.55). In the first 3months, 27 vs 16 patients started DAAs (adjusted IRR 1.77, 0.88-3.58; p=0.111). Few patients were started on DAAs, and a facilitated discussion in HCV management did not lead to a significant increase. Alternative measures, such as incentivizing GP initiations or patients, are suggested to address remaining barriers to DAA uptake in Australian primary care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) Registration Number: ACTRN12619000508178p.

Resistance-associated substitutions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection.

Data on the prevalence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and their implications for treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in European patients with HCV genotype 4. This study investigated RASs before and after DAA failure in different genotype 4 subtypes and evaluated retreatment efficacies. Samples of 195 genotype 4-infected patients were collected in the European Resistance Database and investigated for NS3, NS5A and NS5B RASs. Retreatment efficacies in DAA failure patients were analysed retrospectively. After NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai) failure, subtype 4r was frequent (30%) compared to DAA-naïve patients (5%) and the number of NS5A RASs was significantly higher in subtype 4r compared to 4a or 4d (median three RASs vs no or one RAS, respectively, P<.0001). RASsL28V, L30R and M31L pre-existed in subtype 4r and were maintained after NS5Ai failure. Typical subtype 4r RASs were located in subdomain 1a of NS5A, close to membrane interaction and protein-protein interaction sites that are responsible for multimerization and hence viral replication. Retreatment of 37 DAA failure patients was highly effective with 100% SVR in prior SOF/RBV, PI/SOF and PI/NS5Ai failures. Secondary virologic failures were rare (n=2; subtype 4d and 4r) and only observed in prior NS5Ai/SOF failures (SVR 90%). In conclusion, subtype 4r harboured considerably more RASs compared to other subtypes. A resistance-tailored retreatment using first- and second-generation DAAs was highly effective with SVR rates ≥90% across all subtypes and first-line treatment regimens.

Marked heterogeneity in the diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection in a real-world setting: A large, multicenter study from Japan.

The presence of cirrhosis is an important factor for the management of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and it determines the duration of treatment for HCV with the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen of glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB), that is, 8 or 12weeks, if patients do not have a history of DAA failure. However, in real-world settings, determination of cirrhosis depends on the discretion of the attending hepatologists, and it is unclear whether compensated cirrhosis was homogenously diagnosed or not. In this study, we investigated the real-world diagnosis of cirrhosis by characterizing DAA-naïve patients who underwent a 12-week GLE/PIB regimen in whom cirrhosis was diagnosed, comparing their characteristics with those of patients who underwent an 8-week regimen in whom cirrhosis was absent. In a large, multicenter cohort study, we compared background characteristics and treatment outcomes among DAA-naïve patients who underwent an 8-week versus a 12-week GLE/PIB regimen. Among 977 patients enrolled, 296 (30.3%) were determined to have cirrhosis and underwent a 12-week regimen. Some patient characteristics largely overlapped between the two groups, including liver fibrosis indices. Sustained viral response rates were similar between groups after adjusting liver fibrosis index with propensity score matching. Although adequately diagnosed, the determination of cirrhosis varied widely among institutions or by hepatologists in real-world settings, and the severity of liver fibrosis overlapped significantly between patients in whom compensated cirrhosis was determined to be present and patients in whom cirrhosis was absent. Virologic efficacy was similar after adjusting for the degree of liver fibrosis.

Integrated analysis of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Japanese and overseas patients without cirrhosis and with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 2 infection

BackgroundChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with genotypes (GT) 1 and 2 accounts for over 50% of HCV infections globally, including over 97% of all HCV infections in Japan. Here, we report an integrated analysis of efficacy and safety of 8-week treatment with the all-oral, fixed-dose combination of the direct acting antivirals (DAA), glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P), in DAA-naïve Japanese and overseas patients without cirrhosis and with HCV GT1 or GT2 infection.MethodsData from 899 DAA-naïve patients without cirrhosis and with HCV GT1 or GT2 infection treated with G/P (300/120 mg) for 8 weeks in the six Phase 2 or 3 overseas or Japan-only clinical trials were included. All patients who received ≥ 1 dose of G/P were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The objectives were to evaluate rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) and safety of the 8-week regimen in the ITT population.ResultsOverall, SVR12 was achieved by 98.9% (889/899) of DAA-naïve patients without cirrhosis, including 99.2% (597/602) of GT1-infected and 98.3% (292/297) of GT2-infected patients. Less than 1% (2/899) of patients overall and no Japanese patients experienced virologic failure. SVR12 rate was > 97% for patients regardless of baseline characteristics, and common comorbidities or co-medications. Overall, < 1% (2/899) discontinued G/P due to an adverse event (AE) and 1.6% (14/899) of patients experienced a serious AE.Conclusions8-week G/P treatment is safe and efficacious in DAA-naive patients without cirrhosis and with HCV GT1 or GT2 infection, demonstrating high SVR12 rates regardless of baseline patient and disease characteristics.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiersThe trials discussed in this paper were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as follows: NCT02707952 (CERTAIN-1), NCT02723084 (CERTAIN-2), NCT02243280 (SURVEYOR-I), NCT02243293 (SURVEYOR-II), NCT02604017 (ENDURANCE-1), NCT02738138 (EXPEDITION-2).

424 - SOF/VEL/VOX Results in High SVR12 Rates when Administered for 12 Weeks in Daa-Experienced Patients or for 8 Weeks in Daa-Naïve Patients: An Integrated Analysis of the POLARIS-1, POLARIS-2, POLARIS-3 and POLARIS-4 Studies

Background The once-daily fixed-dose combination tablet of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir(SOF/VEL/VOX) was evaluated for the treatment of genotype 1–6 HCV infection in four Phase 3 studies in direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-experienced (POLARIS-1 and POLARIS-4) and DAA-naive (POLARIS-2 and POLARIS-3) patients with and without compensated cirrhosis. DAA-experienced patients received treatment for 12 weeks, and DAA-naive patients received treatment for 8 weeks. Overall SVR12 rates were >95% across all the studies. This post-hoc analysis assesses efficacy in patients with and without traditional negative predictors of response. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data from 1056 patients treated with SOF/VEL/VOX in the Phase 3 studies. Presence of cirrhosis was determined by histology, Fibrotest/APRI, or Fibroscan. Viral load and other clinical and laboratory assessments were determined prior to treatment with SOF/VEL/VOX. Prior treatment records were source verified, and race was self-reported by the patient to the investigator. Results Overall, 38% of patients had cirrhosis, 70% had HCV RNA ≥800,000 IU/mL, 59% of the DAA-experienced patients had received an NS5A inhibitor-containing regimen, 20% of the DAA-naive patients had prior treatment failure with pegylated interferon +ribavirin, 12% were ≥65 years old and 10% were black. Conclusions The POLARIS-1, POLARIS-2, POLARIS-3, and POLARIS-4 studies enrolled a diverse patient population that included a significant number of patients with historically negative predictors of response including cirrhosis and prior exposure to DAA-containing regimens. High SVR12 rates for the ribavirin-free regimen of SOF/VEL/VOX were achieved across subgroups.

Resistance-associated variants in HCV subtypes 1a and 1b detected by Ion Torrent sequencing platform.

As a result of increased understanding of the HCV life cycle, a new generation of drugs known as direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) was developed and is constantly being improved. At baseline, HCV variants resistant to DAA therapy may pre-exist, increasing the likelihood of treatment failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in treatment-naive patients infected with HCV subtypes 1a and 1b. Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the frequencies of NS3-4A, NS5A and NS5B RAVs in 100 HCV monoinfected DAA-naive patients (HCV-1a: n=51; HCV-1b: n=49). Complete HCV sequence information was obtained for most samples. RAVs were detected in the NS3-4A (T54S, V55A, Q80K and R155K), NS5A (Q30H/R, H58P and Y93C/H/N) and NS5B (A421V) regions in 10%, 22% and 8%, respectively, of patients infected with HCV subtype-1a. Among the patients infected with HCV subtype-1b, mutations in the NS3-4A (F43I, T54S, Q80H, D168E and M175L), NS5A (L28M, R30Q, L31M, Q54H, A92T and Y93H) and NS5B (L159F, C316N, A421V and S556G) regions were observed in 12%, 53% and 31% of patients, respectively. High-throughput DNA sequencing allows an easier and more complete analysis of DAA RAVs, including mutations that represent only a minor variant of the whole viral population. RAVs to the three different classes of DAAs were found in our population. The characterization of their profile in the circulating virus is relevant to determine the better treatment option for infected individuals or to guide the implementation of treatment policies.

Similar prevalence of low-abundance drug-resistant variants in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1a and 1b hepatitis C virus infections as determined by ultradeep pyrosequencing.

Background and ObjectivesHepatitis C virus (HCV) variants that confer resistance to direct-acting-antiviral agents (DAA) have been detected by standard sequencing technology in genotype (G) 1 viruses from DAA-naive patients. It has recently been shown that virological response rates are higher and breakthrough rates are lower in G1b infected patients than in G1a infected patients treated with certain classes of HCV DAAs. It is not known whether this corresponds to a difference in the composition of G1a and G1b HCV quasispecies in regards to the proportion of naturally occurring DAA-resistant variants before treatment.MethodsWe used ultradeep pyrosequencing to determine the prevalence of low-abundance (<25% of the sequence reads) DAA-resistant variants in 191 NS3 and 116 NS5B isolates from 208 DAA-naive G1-infected patients.ResultsA total of 3.5 million high-quality reads of ≥200 nucleotides were generated. The median coverage depth was 4150x and 4470x per NS3 and NS5B amplicon, respectively. Both G1a and G1b populations showed Shannon entropy distributions, with no difference between G1a and G1b in NS3 or NS5B region at the nucleotide level. A higher number of substitutions that confer resistance to protease inhibitors were observed in G1a isolates (mainly at amino acid 80 of the NS3 region). The prevalence of amino acid substitutions that confer resistance to NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitors was similar in G1a and G1b isolates. The NS5B S282T variant, which confers resistance to the polymerase inhibitors mericitabine and sofosbuvir, was not detected in any sample.ConclusionThe quasispecies genetic diversity and prevalence of DAA-resistant variants was similar in G1a and G1b isolates and in both NS3 and NS5B regions, suggesting that this is not a determinant for the higher level of DAA resistance observed across G1a HCV infected patients upon treatment.

Hepatitis C Virus Variants with Decreased Sensitivity to Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) Were Rarely Observed in DAA-Naive Patients prior to Treatment

The prevalence of naturally occurring hepatitis C virus (HCV) variants that are less sensitive to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) inhibitors has not been fully characterized. We used population sequence analysis to assess the frequency of such variants in plasma samples from 3,447 DAA-naive patients with genotype 1 HCV. In general, HCV variants with lower-level resistance (3- to 25-fold increased 50% inhibitor concentration [IC(50)]) to telaprevir were observed as the dominant species in 0 to 3% of patients, depending on the specific variant, whereas higher-level resistant variants (>25-fold-increased IC(50)) were not observed. Specific variants resistant to NS5A inhibitors were predominant in up to 6% of patients. Most variants resistant to nucleo(s/t)ide active-site NS5B polymerase inhibitors were not observed, whereas variants resistant to non-nucleoside allosteric inhibitors were observed in up to 18% of patients. The presence of DAA-resistant variants in NS5A, NS5B, or NS3 (including telaprevir-resistant variants), in baseline samples of treatment-naive patients receiving a telaprevir-based regimen in phase 3 studies did not affect the sustained viral response (SVR). Treatment-naive patients with viral populations containing the telaprevir-resistant variants NS3 V36M, T54S, or R155K at baseline achieved a 74% SVR rate, whereas patients with no resistant variants detected prior to treatment achieved a 76% SVR rate. The effect of specific resistant variant frequency on response to various DAA treatments in different patient populations, including interferon nonresponders, should be further studied.