D External Quality Assessment Scheme Research Articles

Analytical variation concerning total 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement, where are we now? A DEQAS review of current assay performance

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) distributes serum samples globally, on a quarterly basis, to assess participants’ performance of specific methods for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and other vitamin D metabolites. In this review an assessment of the state of the art in the performance of 25OHD methods is presented. This assessment is based on an analysis of data submitted by scheme participants for the 2021/22 distribution cycle, which comprised of four distributions each containing five DEQAS samples. These distributions enabled the assessment of performance across a wide concentration range and included samples containing endogenous 25OHD2. Overall analytical performance continues to improve, but there is still significant method variation and bias in some automated methods. These automated methods continue to be challenged in measuring 25OHD at the extremes of the measuring range and in the presence of 25OHD2. LC-MS/MS methods still show superior performance with regards to bias, but are out-performed by some automated methods in terms of assay variability. Through participating in an accuracy based EQA scheme, such as DEQAS, laboratories are able to assess the accuracy of their methods in comparison to a gold standard reference measurement procedure. It is crucial for all laboratories to be aware of the performance and limitations of their 25OHD assays and to educate their users accordingly in order to ensure reliable assessment of vitamin D status.

Determination of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme samples using a reference measurement procedure

Ninety archived human serum samples from the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) were analyzed using a reference measurement procedure (RMP) based on isotope dilution liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) for the determination of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25(OH)2D3]. These 24,25(OH)2D3 results, in conjunction with concentration values assigned using RMPs for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3], provide a valuable resource for assessing the accuracy of measurements for 24,25(OH)2D3 and for investigating the relationship between 24,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3. Results for 24,25(OH)2D3 using the RMP were compared to DEQAS consensus values demonstrating that the consensus values were not sufficient to assess the accuracy of measurements among different laboratories and methods. A multivariable regression analysis approach using historical DEQAS consensus values for various total 25(OH)D assays was used to assess the contribution of 24,25(OH)2D3 concentration on the assay response. The response of several ligand binding assays for total 25(OH)D was shown to be impacted by the presence of 24,25(OH)2D3.

Assessment of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays for Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) materials distributed at ambient and frozen conditions.

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) distributes human serum samples four times per year to over 1000 participants worldwide for the determination of total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)]. These samples are stored at -40°C prior to distribution and the participants are instructed to store the samples frozen at -20°C or lower after receipt; however, the samples are shipped to participants at ambient conditions (i.e., no temperature control). To address the question of whether shipment at ambient conditions is sufficient for reliable performance of various 25(OH)D assays, the equivalence of DEQAS human serum samples shipped under frozen and ambient conditions was assessed. As part of a Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) commutability study, two sets of the same nine DEQAS samples were shipped to participants at ambient temperature and frozen on dry ice. Twenty-eight laboratories participated in this study and provided 34 sets of results for the measurement of 25(OH)D using 20 ligand binding assays and 14 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Equivalence of the assay response for the frozen versus ambient DEQAS samples for each assay was evaluated using multi-level modeling, paired t-tests including a false discovery rate (FDR) approach, and ordinary least squares linear regression analysis of frozen versus ambient results. Using the paired t-test and confirmed by FDR testing, differences in the results for the ambient and frozen samples were found to be statistically significant at p < 0.05 for four assays (DiaSorin, DIAsource, Siemens, and SNIBE prototype). For all 14 LC-MS/MS assays, the differences in the results for the ambient- and frozen-shipped samples were not found to be significant at p < 0.05 indicating that these analytes were stable during shipment at ambient conditions. Even though assay results have been shown to vary considerably among different 25(OH)D assays in other studies, the results of this study also indicate that sample handling/transport conditions may influence 25(OH)D assay response for several assays.

Assessment of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay commutability of Standard Reference Materials and College of American Pathologists Accuracy-Based Vitamin D (ABVD) Scheme and Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) materials: Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) Commutability Study 2.

An interlaboratory study was conducted through the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) to assess commutability of Standard Reference Materials® (SRMs) and proficiency testing/external quality assessment (PT/EQA) samples for determination of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] using ligand binding assays and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A set of 50 single-donor serum samples were assigned target values for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] using reference measurement procedures (RMPs). SRM and PT/EQA samples evaluated included SRM 972a (four levels), SRM 2973, six College of American Pathologists (CAP) Accuracy-Based Vitamin D (ABVD) samples, and nine Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples. Results were received from 28 different laboratories using 20 ligand binding assays and 14 LC-MS/MS methods. Using the test assay results for total serum 25(OH)D (i.e., the sum of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3) determined for the single-donor samples and the RMP target values, the linear regression and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated. Using a subset of 42 samples that had concentrations of 25(OH)D2 below 30nmol/L, one or more of the SRM and PT/EQA samples with high concentrations of 25(OH)D2 were deemed non-commutable using 5 of 11 unique ligand binding assays. SRM 972a (level 4), which has high exogenous concentration of 3-epi-25(OH)D3, was deemed non-commutable for 50% of the LC-MS/MS assays.

LC-MS/MS analysis of vitamin D3 metabolites in human serum using a salting-out based liquid-liquid extraction and DAPTAD derivatization

LC-MS/MS has recently emerged as the best-practice for simultaneous analysis of vitamin D metabolites. We have developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 in human serum. These three metabolites were extracted from 50 μL of serum by acetonitrile protein precipitation followed by salting-out of acetonitrile. DAPTAD (4-(4′-dimethylaminophenyl)-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione) was used to derivatize the extracted metabolites and their deuterated isotope internal standards. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a UPLC C18 column (Waters® ACQUITY 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) utilizing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile as mobile phases. Limits of quantification were 1 ng/mL for 25(OH)D3 and 0.1 ng/mL for 24,25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3. In-house and external Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) quality control sample analysis revealed satisfactory method accuracy. Within-analytical batch and between analytical batches precision were <15%. Extraction recovery for the three analytes were all ˃ 85% and all showed adequate autosampler, bench-top and freeze–thaw stability. Inter-methodological comparison of 25(OH)D3 results in patient serum samples revealed systematic and proportional differences between our method and DiaSorin® Liaison immunoassay, however a good agreement with an independent LC-MS/MS method was found.

Lyophilization as pre-processing for sample storage in the determination of vitamin D3 and metabolites in serum and plasma

Determination of vitamin D levels in human biological specimens has gained a high relevance over the last decades, essentially because low levels have been associated with several biological disorders. In fact, vitamin D deficiency has become a worldwide health concern covering all ages and genders. The storage of biofluids has to be considered for determination of vitamin D and metabolites in order to fully preserve matrices status. This study attempts to evaluate lyophilization of serum and plasma as a pre-processing step for sample storage prior to quantitative analysis of vitamin D3 and its main hydroxylated metabolites −25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3. The protocol including sample lyophilization was characterized in terms of analytical features and compared to the same method, based on SPE–LC–MS/MS, without lyophilization. Sensitivity, precision and accuracy were not affected when we operated with lyophilized serum and plasma and results provided by a set of twenty-four serum samples from DEQAS (Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme) were in agreement with reported concentrations for 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3. A stability study programmed for 9 months allowed ensuring that the concentration of vitamin D3 and metabolites in lyophilized serum and plasma stored at room temperature was not affected during this period. This research has demonstrated that the quantitation of target metabolites is not under the influence of lyophilization. Therefore, including lyophilization prior to analysis could reduce shipment and storage costs, avoid delays of sample processing, and increase the stability of the target analytes due to an effective quenching process.

Biotin supplementation causes erroneous elevations of results in some commercial serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d (25OHD) assays

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) distributes serum samples globally, on a quarterly basis, to assess participants’ performance of specific methods for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH)2D). DEQAS occasionally circulates samples containing high levels of substances found in certain clinical situations e.g. 25-OHD2, 24,25-(OH)2D3, hypertriglyceridemia. The increased availability and use of health supplements containing biotin has led to case reports of assay interference in methods utilizing a biotin-streptavidin detection system. In October 2018, DEQAS included a serum sample (545) containing exogenous biotin (concentration =586 μg/L) which was analyzed by a total of 683 laboratories using 35 different methods. The same serum sample (544) without exogenous biotin was also included in the 5-sample set. All methods (760 laboratories) performed satisfactorily on sample 544 giving an All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean = 50.2 ± 6.5 nmol/L (±SD, CV = 12.9 %). The target value for this sample 544 (& 555) was 47.4 nmol/L as determined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta, Georgia using their LC–MS/MS reference method. In contrast, #545 containing the exogenous biotin was reported by only 683 laboratories and gave an All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean = 66.8 ± 37.6 nmol/L (±SD, CV = 56.3 %). As expected, LC-MS/MS methods (143 labs) reported similar results for both 544 = 48.9 ± 4.4 nmol/L (±SD) and 545 = 48.3 ± 4.5 nmol/L (±SD) showing that assays involving chromatographic steps are unaffected by the presence of biotin. Several of the antibody-based assays including Abbott Architect, DiaSorin Liaison, Beckman Unicel and Siemens Centaur are also unaffected by the addition of biotin. Two assays, IDS-iSYS and Roche Total 25OHD, both of which use biotin-streptavidin, exhibit biotin interference yielding values with a significant positive bias for 545 of 102.6 nmol/L ± 78.7 nmol/L (±SD) and 517.8 nmol/L ± 209.8 nmol/L (±SD) respectively. Interestingly, the failure to report sample 545 data from 77 laboratories is due solely to those running Roche Total 25OHD or Roche Vitamin D Total II assays. Given the prevalence of the adversely affected assays (25 % of DEQAS users) and the high volume of 25OHD testing, clinicians using these assays should, where possible, only measure 25OHD when patients are off biotin.

Limitations of platform assays to measure serum 25OHD level impact on guidelines and practice decision making

ContextLiquid Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) is the preferred method to measure 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels, but laboratories are increasingly adopting automated platform assays. ObjectiveWe assessed the performance of commonly used automated immunoassays, with that of LC-MS/MS, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reference values, to measure 25OHD levels. Methods/SettingWe compared serum 25OHD levels obtained from 219 elderly subjects, enrolled in a vitamin D trial, using the Diasorin Liaison platform assay, and the tandem LC-MS/MS method. We also assessed the performance of the Diasorin and Roche automated assays, expressed as mean % bias from the NIST standards, based on the vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) reports, from 2013 to 2017. ResultsSerum 25OHD levels were significantly lower in the Diasorin compared to LC-MS/MS assay at baseline, 18.5 ± 7.8 vs 20.5 ± 7.6 ng/ml (p < 0.001), and all other time points. Diasorin (25OHD) = 0.76 × LC-MS/MS (25OHD) + 4.3, R2 = 0.596. The absolute bias was independent of 25OHD values, and the pattern unfit for any cross-calibration. The proportion of subjects considered for vitamin D treatment based on pre-set cut-offs differed significantly between the 2 assays. There also was wide variability in the performance of both automated assays, compared to NIST reference values. ConclusionThe performance of most widely used automated assays is sub-optimal. Our findings underscore the pressing need to re-consider current practices with regard to 25OHD measurements, interpretation of results from research studies, meta-analyses, the development of vitamin D guidelines, and their relevance to optimizing health.

Evaluation of the new restandardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay on the iSYS platform

Background25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is the most reliable biomarker of vitamin D status, but until now 25(OH)D assays have suffered from inter-laboratory and inter-assay discrepancies. In the setting of the international Vitamin D Standardization Program, Immunodiagnostic Systems (IDS) recently reformulated and restandardized the 25(OH)D immunoassay available on the automated iSYS platform. In the present study, we evaluated this new generation of the 25(OH)D immunoassay (IS-2500). MethodsRepeatability and within-laboratory imprecision were verified according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP15-A3. Results from the sera of 63 patients were compared with those obtained with the previous iSYS method (IS-2700S) using Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analysis. The prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficient was calculated to assess the agreement of vitamin D status provided by the two iSYS immunoassays. Fourteen Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples were used to evaluate inaccuracy. ResultsUsing the EP15-A3 protocol, repeatability and within-laboratory imprecision obtained with the new iSYS method were lower than 6% and 8%, respectively. These results are consistent with the manufacturer's claims. In more adverse conditions (50 measurements over 15days with multiple calibrations), the within-laboratory imprecision was 14.8% (39nmol/L) and 7.7% (155nmol/L). 25(OH)D concentrations measured with the new assay showed a strong correlation with those provided by the previous version (r=0.969, p<0.0001). The Passing-Bablok regression equation was as follows: new assay=1.079 x (previous assay) - 3.6nmol/L. The PABAK coefficient of 0.810 reflected almost perfect agreement between the two immunoassays to classify patients according to their vitamin D status (85.7% of agreement). Using DEQAS samples, the mean inaccuracy bias was lower than 5% when the new iSYS method was compared with LC-MS/MS methods and the NIST reference measurement procedure. ConclusionThe new generation of the iSYS immunoassay evaluated in this study meets requirements for routinely measuring 25(OH)D levels in clinical laboratories.

Establishing an Accuracy Basis for the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS).

Until recently, the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) assessed the performance of various assays for the determination of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] by using a consensus mean based on the all-laboratory trimmed mean (ALTM) of the approximately 1000 participants' results. Since October 2012, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), as part of the Vitamin D Standardization Program, has participated in DEQAS by analyzing the quarterly serum sample sets using an isotope dilution LC-tandem MS (ID LC-MS/MS) reference measurement procedure to assign an accuracy-based target value for serum total 25(OH)D. NIST has analyzed 90 DEQAS samples (18 exercises × 5 samples/exercise) to assign target values. The NIST-assigned values are compared with the ALTM and the biases assessed for various assays used by the participants, e.g., LC-MS/MS, HPLC, and several ligand-binding assays. The NIST-value assignment process and the results of the analyses of the 90 DEQAS samples are summarized. The absolute mean bias between the NIST-assigned values and the ALTM was 5.6%, with 10% of the samples having biases >10%. Benefits of the accuracy-based target values are presented, including for sample sets with high concentrations of 25(OH)D2 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3.

Quality assessment of vitamin D metabolite assays used by clinical and research laboratories

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) was launched in 1989 and monitors the performance of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) assays. In April 2015 a pilot scheme for 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)2D) was introduced. The 25-OHD scheme is accuracy − based with target values assigned by the NIST Reference Measurement Procedure (RMP) for 25-OHD2 and 25-OHD3. A similar method is used to assign values for 3-epi-25-OHD. Five samples of human serum are distributed quarterly to over 1000 participants in 58 countries (April 2016) and clinical laboratories are expected to submit results within approximately 5 weeks. Research laboratories with assays run less frequently are not given a deadline. Archived samples with NIST- assigned values are also available. Performance is assessed on the first four samples with the fifth reserved for investigations e.g. recovery experiments or to assess the influence of other serum constituents such as lipids. DEQAS provides rapid feedback, with an on-line preliminary report available immediately after a participant submits results and a comprehensive report soon after the results deadline. In 2015, DEQAS investigations revealed that several 25-OHD immunoassays under-recovered 25-OHD2 and 25-OHD results were falsely low on a sample with a modestly raised triglyceride concentration. An RMP for 1,25 (OH)2D is not yet available and results are judged against the Method Mean. Free advice is available from the DEQAS Advisory Panel which includes experts on methodology and biostatistics. DEQAS collaborates closely with the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) and both organizations have successfully worked with participants and manufacturers to improve the accuracy of vitamin D assays.

Toxicity of waste water chemicals: Bisphenol A, diuron and PFOA

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] is the most important vitamin D metabolite in regulating calcium and phosphorus metabolism and bone resorption. It is measured in plasma for diagnosis and management of patients with disorders influencing vitamin D metabolism. The most common methods for 1,25(OH)2D quantification are competitive isotopic I125 immunoassays. The purpose of this work is to compare the IDS isotopic immunoassay (IDS RIA) and the nonisotopic iSYS immunoassay (IDS iSYS) for 1,25(OH)2D measurement in human serum and in control samples obtained from the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS).1,25(OH)2D concentrations in 180 serum samples (87 females and 93 males) and in 25 samples from the DEQAS were assayed using IDS RIA and IDS iSYS methods. Both assays were performed after delipidation and immunoextraction steps.Measurement range was 9.0–348.0 pmol/L and 15.6–504.0 pmol/L for IDS RIA and IDS iSYS assay, respectively. ‘Normal adult’ reference ranges of 1,25(OH)2D were 43–168 pmol/L for IDS RIA and 63–228 pmol/L for IDS iSYS.The equation of the Deming regression analysis demonstrated that IDS iSYS tended to give lower 1,25(OH)2D concentrations by a mean of 20% over the tested concentration range when compared to IDS RIA.Both assays would easily meet the DEQAS goal of 80% of survey samples within 30% of the All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean “ALTM”. Results of 1,25(OH)2D obtained using IDS iSYS in samples distributed by DEQAS were closely related to those by LC–MS/MS method.The concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D measured by the IDS iSYS tended to be lower than those of IDS RIA in patients, but quite comparable to those of LC–MS/MS and ALTM in DEQAS samples.

Evaluation of a new automated assay for the measurement of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in daily practice

Background and objective1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] is the most important vitamin D metabolite in regulating calcium and phosphorus metabolism and bone resorption. It is measured in plasma for diagnosis and management of patients with disorders influencing vitamin D metabolism. The most common methods for 1,25(OH)2D quantification are competitive isotopic I125 immunoassays. The purpose of this work is to compare the IDS isotopic immunoassay (IDS RIA) and the nonisotopic iSYS immunoassay (IDS iSYS) for 1,25(OH)2D measurement in human serum and in control samples obtained from the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS). Methods1,25(OH)2D concentrations in 180 serum samples (87 females and 93 males) and in 25 samples from the DEQAS were assayed using IDS RIA and IDS iSYS methods. Both assays were performed after delipidation and immunoextraction steps.Measurement range was 9.0–348.0pmol/L and 15.6–504.0pmol/L for IDS RIA and IDS iSYS assay, respectively. ‘Normal adult’ reference ranges of 1,25(OH)2D were 43–168pmol/L for IDS RIA and 63–228pmol/L for IDS iSYS. ResultsThe equation of the Deming regression analysis demonstrated that IDS iSYS tended to give lower 1,25(OH)2D concentrations by a mean of 20% over the tested concentration range when compared to IDS RIA.Both assays would easily meet the DEQAS goal of 80% of survey samples within 30% of the All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean “ALTM”. Results of 1,25(OH)2D obtained using IDS iSYS in samples distributed by DEQAS were closely related to those by LC–MS/MS method. ConclusionsThe concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D measured by the IDS iSYS tended to be lower than those of IDS RIA in patients, but quite comparable to those of LC–MS/MS and ALTM in DEQAS samples.

Interpreting vitamin D assay results: proceed with caution.

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are common in patients with CKD. Association studies suggest that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-D3) is a harbinger of poor outcomes in these patients. Serum 25-OH-D represents the best biomarker of vitamin D status, but there is much debate surrounding the performance of some of the assay methods. Programs such as the Vitamin D Standardization Program and Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) in the United Kingdom have allowed us to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the available methods. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based methods for serum 25-OH-D measurement are emerging as more accurate and reliable alternatives to the immunoassay-based methods that have dominated over the past 2 decades. There is a renewed optimism that serum 25-OH-D is a useful biomarker to be used in patients with CKD, in particular to diagnose vitamin D deficiency and monitor vitamin D therapy. This commentary discusses some of the methodologic problems associated with serum 25-OH-D assays and their resolution, and looks forward to the future of vitamin D testing.

Optimized 25-hydroxyvitamin D analysis using liquid–liquid extraction with 2D separation with LC/MS/MS detection, provides superior precision compared to conventional assays

The analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) and related metabolites represents a considerable challenge for both clinical and research laboratories worldwide. There is currently debate about the best methodology employed to assess vitamin D status and whether the 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (3-epi-25(OH)D3) should be separated and quantitated when measuring 25(OH)D3. Mass spectrometry techniques are generally regarded as the gold standard due to high specificity for vitamin D metabolites. However, many methods require high sample volumes for analysis. We have developed a new 2 dimensional (2D) ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) separation coupled tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection to accurately quantitate 25(OH)D3, epi-25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2 in adults and children, requiring only 50 μL of human serum. The assay gives excellent separation of epi-25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2 from 25(OH)D3, has excellent precision with an intra-assay CV of 0.5 % at 74 nmol/L and can report down to 2 nmol/L for 25(OH)D3. Furthermore, the method shows excellent agreement with the vitamin D external quality assessment scheme (DEQAS) quality control program for vitamin D analysis. We present this approach as a candidate reference method for 25(OH)D3, epi-25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2 analysis in humans.

High-performance liquid chromatography and coulometric electrode array detector in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 analyses

The diode array detector in our high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25OHD3) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25OHD2) did not perform satisfactorily for measuring human serum concentrations below 30nM. Because of a need for a reliable self-managed method in ongoing and starting vitamin D studies of the laboratory, we decided to develop a chromatographic method applying coulometric electrode array detector (CEAD) and evaluate reliability of the method by participating in the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS). The limit of quantification for 25OHD3 and 25OHD2 of the new method was 0.36pmol on column (3.6nM), and linearity ranged from 5 to 2400nM. Accuracy of the method was 90% for 25OHD3 and 69% for 25OHD2. The HPLC–CEAD results from five DEQAS rounds were in line with those of the other participating laboratories using HPLC methods. The HPLC–CEAD results for 25OHD3 also corresponded to the results obtained with the Chromsystems HPLC method in a certified laboratory. The long-term coefficients of variation for 25OHD3 were 6.2%, 7.8%, 5.2%, 6.7%, and 7.3% in concentrations of 27.5, 38.7, 48.4, 78.4, and 88.0nM, respectively. The developed HPLC–CEAD method was shown to be applicable for determining 25OHD3 and 25OHD2 in human serum samples.

Method for simultaneous analysis of eight analogues of vitamin D using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

BackgroundDespite considerable global investigation over several decades, the roles of vitamin D in health and disease development remains convoluted. One recognised issue is the difficulty of accurately measuring the active forms of vitamin D. Advances made include some new methods addressing the potential interference by excluding epimers and isobars. However, there is no evidence that epimers are without function. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate, for the first time, a new assay to simultaneously measure levels of six forms of vitamin D along with two epimers. The assay was applied to multilevel certified reference material (CRM) and 25 pooled human sera samples, obtained from the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS), to demonstrate its efficiency.ResultsThe assay is capable of simultaneously measuring eight vitamin D analogues over the calibration ranges and LODs (in nmol/L) of: 1α25(OH)2D2 [0.015-1; 0.01], 1α25(OH)2D3 [0.1-100; 0.01], 25OHD3 [0.5-100, 0.025], 3-epi-25OHD3 [0.1-100, 0.05], 25OHD2 [0.5-100, 0.025], 3-epi-25OHD2 [0.1-100, 0.05], vitamin D3 [0.5-100, 0.05] and vitamin D2 [0.5-100, 0.05], using stanozolol-d3 as internal standard. Certified reference material and external quality control samples (DEQAS) were analysed to meet the standards outlined by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Validation steps included recovery and both precision and accuracy under inter- and intra-day variation limit of detection, and analysis of each analyte over a linear range. All validation parameters were in line with acceptable Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. All eight analogues were quantified with the 25OHD levels being commensurate with DEQAS data.ConclusionsThis report details the application of a new LC-MS/MS based assay for the efficient analysis of eight analogues of vitamin D over a range of samples, which is a significant advance over the existing methods. Simultaneous measure of eight vitamin D analogues does not compromise the analytical capability of the assay to quantify the commonly used biomarker (25OHD) for vitamin D status. The results demonstrate the feasibility of applying the assay in research and clinical practice that i) excludes misleading measures owing to epimers and isobars and ii) is able to quantify the excluded component to facilitate further in vivo investigation into the roles of ubiquitous epimers.

Performance evaluation of Siemens ADVIA Centaur and Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total 25-OH Vitamin D assays

ObjectivesTo evaluate the newly developed Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total Vitamin D and the Siemens ADVIA Centaur® Vitamin D Total assays. Materials and MethodsAssays were evaluated using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Split patient samples were compared with LC-MS/MS and DiaSorin LIAISON assays (n=79 including 15 specimens with detectable endogenous 25-OH vitamin D2). Assay accuracy was also evaluated using the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples. ResultsThe ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated maximum total CVs of 14.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Both showed excellent linearity (R2>0.99). The ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated interference with bilirubin at 800μmol/L, hemolysis at 1.25g/L, and triglycerides at 2.8mmol/L. Compared to LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a R2 value of 0.893, average bias of −8.8%; the E170 assay an R2 value of 0.872, average bias of 14.3% with underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D2. Compared to the LIAISON assay, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated an R2 value of 0.781, average bias of −17.3%; the E170 assay an R2 value of 0.823, average bias of 11.4%. The ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated a biases of <20% in 10/10 and 8/10 DEQAS samples, respectively. ConclusionsThe ADVIA Centaur and E170 vitamin D assays demonstrated acceptable linearity, imprecision, and accuracy. The E170 assay demonstrated consistent underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D2 levels. Compared with LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a higher R2 value and a smaller average bias than the E170 assay.

Variability in the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: The devil is in the detail

BackgroundLiquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) is increasingly used in clinical laboratories for the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), but measurement is not straightforward. Importantly, LC–MS/MS is not a single technique: variables in sample preparation, chromatography and ionisation/fragmentation should each be considered. MethodsWe analysed results from a survey organised by the international Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS), to determine the influence of such variables on the results for two DEQAS distributions. Results65 laboratories returned questionnaires. 346 (57%) individual results were from laboratories using electrospray ionisation (ESI), and 259 (43%) from laboratories using atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI). Although the mean ratio of results was not significantly different between ESI and APCI (P=0.5828), there was greater variation (P<0.0001) in results obtained by laboratories using ESI. Greater variation (P<0.05) was also observed between results from laboratories monitoring non-specific water-loss transitions. Only 3 laboratories (5%) could resolve the isobaric metabolite 3-epi-25OHD3 from 25OHD3. ConclusionsThere are many variables to consider when using LC–MS/MS, including assay standardisation/calibration, chromatography and MS conditions. MS/MS alone cannot distinguish isobaric metabolites such as 3-epi-25OHD3. Interference can also occur if non-specific transitions are used. Laboratories should always subscribe to an EQA scheme for 25OHD analysis.

Accuracy of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Assays: Confronting the Issues

Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) is widely used for assessing vitamin D status. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. To achieve higher throughput, these methods have abandoned the traditional solvent extraction of samples and are therefore more prone to non-specific interference. The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) has revealed method-related differences in 25-OHD results, raising concerns about the comparability and accuracy of different assays. This paper highlights some of the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical issues which may influence the accuracy of 25-OHD assays and interpretation of results. Recent attention has focused on reconciling the relatively high results given by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to those of the DiaSorin radioimmunoassay (RIA) on which clinical decision points have previously been based. Data is presented on 20 DEQAS samples which were analysed by an LC-MS/MS assay developed as a candidate reference measurement procedure by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The NIST results were on average 11.2% lower than those given by routine LC-MS/MS methods. If confirmed, these results suggest that most routine LC-MS/MS assays are perhaps overestimating 25-OHD by failing to resolve a molecule having the same mass as 25-OHD(3) and a similar fragmentation pattern. All 25-OHD assays should be monitored by a proficiency testing scheme and the results made available to clinicians and editors of scientific journals.