REVIEWS 571 and Vostrá, and brilliant productions of Czech and international works by E. F. Burian, Jiří Frejka, Jan Grossman and others discussed here. Day does not, however,typicallyhighlightthemanyworksthatareunequivocallymoralizing, didactic and self-righteous, serve rather than subvert political programmes, advocate conformity or are simply shallow; moreover, important figures (for example, Karel Sabina, Vítězslav Nezval and Pavel Kohout) seem to fade in and out depending on how far they fit the narrative. Day’s almost nostalgic perspective derives from her close personal acquaintance with Czech theatre from the extraordinary variety and energy of the 1960s liberalization, through the years of dissent, to the central role played by theatre people and spaces as Communism fell. This connection manifests itself in the dominance in her book of not only this period and its political values over any other, but also a breathless, encyclopaedic focus on people, frequently brought to life through short, amusing or touching anecdotes. The textual aspect of theatre is subordinate here to the lived world of directors, actors, designers, scholars and audiences interacting with one another and the world outside. Trial by Theatre reflects its author’s long-standing work as an advocate for Czech theatre through translation, writing and teaching and as an ally of proponents of Czech civil society before and after 1989. It is attractively presented in large-size paperback with numerous photographs and images and includes a useful select bibliography of both English-language and Czech sources, and a ‘dramatis personae’ of the key figures in Czech theatrical history and plays mentioned. It leaves to others, however, the task of updating not only the story of Czech theatre, but also the interpretative frames through which its most creative periods are understood. University of Oxford Rajendra A. Chitnis MacKay, John. Dziga Vertov: Life and Work (Volume 1: 1896–1921). Film and Media Studies. Academic Studies Press, Boston, MA, 2018. xcvi + 372 pp. Illustrations. Figures. Notes. Archives consulted. Filmography. Bibliography. Index. $129.00: £123.00; $35.00: £29.95. Dziga Vertov (1896–1954), one of the most influential Soviet filmmakers of his generation, is best known in the West as the director of Man with a Movie Camera (Chelovek s kinoapparatom, 1929), arguably the greatest documentary film ever made. He was also a vociferous theorist, who rejected fiction cinema and advocated nonfiction filmmaking as the best vehicle for representing the revolutionary new Soviet world. Much has been written about Vertov, but John MacKay’s book — volume one of his much anticipated three-volume study — SEER, 98, 3, JULY 2020 572 is the first English-language biography devoted to him. MacKay describes it as a ‘critical-biographical study’ (p. xxxiii), but this unassuming designation does not do justice to his work’s extraordinary scope and range of reference. MacKay’s lengthy introduction (which refers not only to the present volume, but also to the forthcoming volumes two and three) provides a critical overview of the most important waves of Vertov reception since his death in 1954. A tour de force of summary, synthesis and clarity, MacKay’s survey ranges widely across scholarship published in Russian, English, French and German, demonstrating how it has been inflected by shifting historical, ideological and cultural contexts, and guiding the reader through the numerous ‘textual labyrinth[s]’ (p. lxii) that have developed around key Vertovian concepts, such as Kino-Pravda (Film-Truth) and Kino-Glaz (Kino-Eye). The book’s main body covers the first twenty-five years of the filmmaker’s life, from his birth, as David Abelevich Kaufman, on 15 January 1896 to the end of 1921. By this time, he had changed his name twice (first to Denis Arkad´evich Kaufman, then to Dziga Vertov) and embarked on a career in the nascent Soviet cinema industry. He had not yet made any of his major films, however, or written any of his most significant theoretical texts. MacKay’s purposes in focusing on the early period of the filmmaker’s life are to uncover ‘the “beginnings of the historical object” called Vertov’ (p. 2), to trace the trajectory of his cinematic and theoretical practice, and to assess the influence on his filmmaking of the various contexts — familial, social, cultural, ideological...
Read full abstract