In high-rise buildings, reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls, particularly those forming part of coupled wall systems or core wall systems, may be subjected to coupled axial tension and cyclic lateral loads during strong seismic events. A new two-dimensional material model named the “Fixed Angle Model Considering Crack Sliding” (FAM-CS) was proposed for simulating the nonlinear behavior of RC walls subjected to axial tension and cyclic lateral loads. The proposed model was implemented in the OpenSees platform. Nonlinear constitutive models for shear aggregate interlock effects of concrete and dowel action of rebars were incorporated into the proposed model to represent the shear transfer mechanisms along concrete cracks. The proposed model was validated against the test data of six wall specimens subjected to coupled axial tension and cyclic lateral loads. The results indicated that the proposed model reasonably predicted the lateral strength capacity (an average error of 6.2 %) and the residual strength at the maximum drift loading (an average error of 12.3 %) of the specimens. For comparison, three other commonly used models, the Shear-Flexure Interaction Multiple-Vertical-Line-Element-Model, the multi-layer shell element model and the Cyclic Softened Membrane Model were adopted for the simulation of the specimens. Compared with the three existing OpenSees models, the newly implemented material model provided improved predictions of the wall hysteretic behavior with respect to lateral strength capacity, lateral strength degradation, pinching characteristics and cyclic stiffness degradation. In addition, the proposed model reasonably captured the localized failure pattern as well as the energy dissipation characteristics of the test specimens. Finally, a mesh sensitivity study was conducted to assess the robustness of the proposed model. The results revealed that the proposed model was robust regarding the lateral load-drift responses of RC walls, with a mesh size ranging from approximately one to three times the average crack spacing.
Read full abstract