Cutoff Value For Lymph Node Ratio Research Articles

The clinical significance of the lymph node ratio as a recurrence indicator in ampullary cancer after curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The clinical significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR), the number of metastatic lymph nodes per dissected lymph node, has not been sufficiently clarified in ampullary cancer. Among patients diagnosed histopathologically with ampullary cancer between 1980 and 2018, the study included 106 who underwent pathological radical resection by pancreaticoduodenectomy. The relationships between the LNR and metastatic lymph node sites and prognosis were examined. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors. In the 46 patients (43%) with metastatic lymph nodes, the LNR in the recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the non-recurrence group (0.15 ± 0.11 vs. 0.089 ± 0.071, p = 0.025). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the LNR cut-off value, 0.07 (area under the curve = 0.70, sensitivity 81%, specificity 56%), was a significant indicator for recurrence (22% vs. 61%, p = 0.016) and prognosis (5-year survival: 48% vs. 83%, p = 0.028). Among the metastatic lymph node sites in the 46 positive cases, lymph node metastases developed from the peripancreatic head region (80%, 37/46) to the superior mesenteric artery (33%, 15/46) and para-aortic (11%, 5/46) regions. Lymph node metastasis is an independent prognostic factor, and the LNR is a significant indicator for recurrence and prognosis in patients with ampullary cancer.

Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system

BackgroundThe current pathologic N (pN) classification exhibits limitations in the prognostic stratification of patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a new lymph nodal staging method based on the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR). MethodsData from 7883 patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 GC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and Zhejiang Cancer Provincial Hospital. Optimal cutoff values for ELNs and LNR were determined using X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier methods, Log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were employed in this study. Patients were categorized into 3 new pN stages: new pN0 (pN0 with ELNs of >16), new pN1 (pN0 with ELNs of ≤16 or pN1-2 with LNR of ≤0.15), and new pN2 (pN1-2 with LNR of >0.15). The prognostic predictive power of both current and new pN staging was evaluated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion, concordance index (C-index), and receiver operating characteristic curve. ResultsThe new pN classification exhibited excellent performance in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. After adjusting for confounding factors, the new pN staging emerged as an independent prognostic indicator in patients with GC. In the SEER cohort, the new pN staging demonstrated enhanced prognostic prediction accuracy over the American Joint Committee on Cancer pN staging (AIC: 75578.85 vs 75755.06; C-index: 0.642 vs 0.630; P < .001). Similar findings were validated in the Chinese cohort. ConclusionThis study developed and validated an improved pN classification for patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 GC. Surgeons should consider ELNs and LNR when assessing postoperative prognosis in patients with GC.

Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy on High-Risk Stage pIIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Complete Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk patients with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Data from NSCLC patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. The study examined the association between lymph node ratio (LNR) and both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using restricted cubic spline curves. Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on established LNR cut-off values, and survival outcomes were compared between those receiving postoperative radiotherapy and those who did not within the high-risk group. The study included 1,690 patients. An LNR threshold of 0.29 was identified for both CSS and OS. Patients with an LNR ≥ 0.29 demonstrated significantly worse CSS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37 - 1.78; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.28 - 1.62; P < 0.001) compared to those with an LNR < 0.29. In the high-risk group (LNR ≥ 0.29), postoperative radiotherapy did not significantly affect CSS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.17; P = 0.809) or OS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.81 - 1.11; P = 0.533). LNR is a significant prognostic factor in patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC post complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. A higher LNR (≥ 0.29) is associated with poorer CSS and OS. However, postoperative radiotherapy does not confer survival benefits in these high-risk patients. Our findings suggest that postoperative radiotherapy should not be routinely performed in this subgroup. Further research is required to explore effective treatment strategies for these patients.

Association between lymph node ratio and survival outcomes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundRecent reports have shown that the Lymph node ratio (LNR) is useful for predicting the prognosis in some cancers, however there are few reports on the usefulness of LNR in predicting the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The predictive value of LNR for prognosis of OSCC was investigated. Materials and methodsThe study included 152 patients with OSCC and histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastasis who underwent neck dissection. We analyzed the relationship between LNR and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) retrospectively in these cases, with the relationship between prognosis and clinicopathological findings also examined. ResultsUsing a receiver operating characteristics curve, the LNR cutoff value was set at 0.095, categorizing 64 and 88 cases into high LNR (≥ 0.095) and low LNR (< 0.095) groups, respectively. Regarding OS and RFS, the prognosis was significantly worse in the high LNR group compared with the low LNR group. In multivariate analysis, sex, postoperative nodal stage, and LNR merged as independent prognostic factors. ConclusionThis study's findings suggest that LNR may represent a prognostic indicator in OSCC with cervical lymph node metastasis.

Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio for Overall Survival after Curative Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Accurate rectal cancer N staging requires the histopathological evaluation of at least 12 lymph nodes. Retrieval of that count is not always possible. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the lymph node ratio (LNR) prognostic significance on overall survival. Methods: The current study is a retrospective cohort study of 229 patients who underwent curative surgery for resectable rectal cancer. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for Lymph Node Count (LNC), Positive Lymph Nodes count (PLN), and LNR for overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used for univariate analysis of factors affecting OS. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to test significance. A Cox-Regression Hazard model was used to detect the most significant factor affecting OS. Results: ROC curve analysis of the PLNs revealed a poor prognostic value of the test, with a sensitivity of 51.9% at PLNs 4 cutoff value, with a shorter mean OS above it (21.71±11.597 vs. 31.20 ± 16.634 for ≥4 vs. &lt;4). ROC curve analysis of LNC revealed the poor value of the test, with a sensitivity of 56% at LNC 12 cutoff value, with longer mean Overall Survival (OS) above it (28.21±15.432 vs. 22.22±12.97 for LNC ≥12 vs. &lt;12). ROC curve analysis of the LNR revealed good value of the test for predicting survival, with a sensitivity of 95% at LNR 18.82% cutoff value, with longer mean OS above it (21.44±11.607 vs. 39.82±15.085 for LNR ≥18.8% vs. &lt;18.8%). According to our univariate analysis, the factors significantly affecting OS were histopathological examination (p =.000), Lympho-Vascular Invasion (LVI) (p =.014), and the LNC cutoff value (p=.002), the PLN cutoff value (p =.008), and the LNR cutoff value (p =.000. According to our multivariate analysis, the LNR cutoff value of 18.8% was the most significant factor affecting OS (p =.000). Conclusions: A high LNR with an 18.82% cutoff value is an independent adverse prognostic factor affecting OS after curative surgery for cancer rectum. The LNR could be considered a good alternative to the absolute number of PLNs, particularly in patients with a low LNC. A higher LNC ≥12 was associated with a longer OS; maximum possible lymphadenectomy should be performed for each patient.

Lymph Node Ratio Enhances Predictive Value for Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: To compare the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) and pN in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing surgery. Materials and methods: NSCLC patients were investigated between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. The X-tile software was used to determine LNR cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The identified cut-off values of LNR were 0.19 and 0.73. Median CSS for LNR1 (LNR < 0.19), LNR2 (0.19 ≤ LNR ≤ 0.73), and LNR3 (LNR > 0.73) were 71, 41, and 17 months. Both LNR2 (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.36-1.57; P < 0.001) and LNR3 (HR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.58-3.15; P < 0.001) demonstrated poorer median CSS compared to LNR1. Similarly, median OS for LNR1, LNR2, and LNR3 were 50, 35, and 16 months. LNR2 (HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.27-1.45; P < 0.001) and LNR3 (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.37-2.85; P < 0.001) exhibited worse median OS compared to LNR1. A revised pN (r-pN) classification incorporating LNR and pN demonstrated superior penalized goodness-of-fit and discriminative ability in predicting CSS and OS compared to both LNR and pN. Conclusion: LNR outperformed pN in predicting CSS and OS in NSCLC patients undergoing surgery, potentially leading to more precise adjuvant treatment decisions.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

A growing number of studies have found that the lymph node ratio (LNR) is an important indicator of prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Impact analysis for LNR was performed for survival in patients undergoing surgery for stage III NSCLC compared to the surveillance, epidemiology and end results databank. Clinicopathological variables, such as cancer-specific survival (CSS), were taken from the surveillance epidemiology and end result databank of stage III NSCLC patients who underwent surgery, and the LNR threshold stratification of NSCLC patients was computed by X-tile. CSS was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method with CSS-independent risk factors calculated by multivariate Cox regression analysis. In total, 7011 lung cancer patients were included. Multifactorial analysis showed that LNR and positive node category had predictive value for stage III NSCLC. In patients with stage IIIA NSCLC, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with T1-2N2 stage had clearly superior CSS than those with T3-4N1 stage (P < .001), which conflicted with the results from the assessment of primary tumor, lymph nodes, and metastasis/N stage. The cutoff values for LNR were 0.31 and 0.59. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the CSS was substantially better in patients with LNR-low than in those with LNR-medium or LNR-high (P < .001), which was also proven by multivariate competing risk regression. Subgroup analysis suggested that the survival advantage of a lower LNR was achieved in all subgroups (sex, race, etc). In stage III NSCLC, the LNR is a valuable factor for assessing prognosis, in which a higher LNR indicates a worse prognosis.

Assessing the role of central lymph node ratio in predicting recurrence in N1a low-to-intermediate risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is associated with postoperative recurrence. Recently, most studies have focused on the evaluation of recurrence in patients with late-stage PTC, with limited data on those with early-stage PTC. We aimed to assess the relationship between lymph node ratio (LNR) and recurrence in low-to-intermediate-risk patients and validate its diagnostic efficiency in both structural (STR) and biochemical recurrence (BIR). Clinical data of patients with PTC diagnosed at the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University were retrospectively collected. The optimal LNR cut-off values for disease-free survival (DFS) were determined using X-tile software. Predictors were validated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. LNR had a higher diagnostic effectiveness than metastatic lymph nodes in patients with low-to-intermediate recurrence risk N1a PTC. The optimal LNR cutoff values for STR and BIR were 0.75 and 0.80, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LNR≥0.75 and LNR≥0.80 were independent factors for STR and BIR, respectively. The 5-year DFS was 90.5% in the high LNR (≥0.75) and 96.8% in low LNR (<0.75) groups for STR. Regarding BIR, the 5-year DFS was 75.7% in the high LNR (≥0.80) and 86.9% in low LNR (<0.80) groups. The high and low LNR survival curves exhibited significant differences on the log-rank test. LNR was associated with recurrence in patients with low-to-intermediate recurrence risk N1a PTC. We recommend those with LNR≥0.75 require a comprehensive evaluation of lateral neck lymphadenopathy and consideration for lateral neck dissection and RAI treatment.

Lymph node ratio evaluation precisely predicts the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

The matter of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in esophageal cancer (ESCA) was far from conclusive. Some evidence indicated that lymph node status could affect treatment. We evaluated lymph node ratio (LNR) as an indicator that could be applied to predict PORT benefit. Retrospective cohort study collected the data of N1, N2, N3 stage ESCA patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) to analyze the association between LNR and prognosis from 2004 to 2015. Patients were categorized into two subsets based on the LNR cut-off value of 0.23 using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the proportion of overall survival (OS) and esophagus cancer-specific survival (CSS) in two LNR groups. Cox regression analysis and competitive risk model was adopted to investigate the impacts of LNR on prognosis. Of 2,165 ESCA patients identified, 1,165 (53.8%) had LNR>0.23. The LNR was an independent prognostic factor and associated with better OS and CSS of LNR≤0.23 (P<0.001). In competitive risk model, a worse CSS was analyzed of LNR>0.23 (HR=1.71; 95% CI 1.53-1.91). Subgroup analyses indicated that PORT was associated with favorable OS and CSS. Furthermore, when stratified by Node stage, PORT was associated with a survival benefit only in N1 stage with higher LNR (LNR>0.23) after adjusting for other covariates. LNR exceeding 0.23 was negatively associated with prognosis in ESCA. The survival benefit from PORT in ESCA seems to be limited to LNR of 23% or more only in N1 stage. This study highlights the biomarker meaning of LNR on identifying PORT beneficiary in N1 stage.

Lymph node ratio as a tool to stratify patients with N1b papillary thyroid cancer.

The prognostic significance of lymph node ratio (LNR) in N1b papillary thyroid cancer is unclear. Therefore, the impact of LNR on disease-specific mortality (DSM) and overall survival (OS) in patients with N1b papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) needs to be defined. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of patients who had undergone thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection. Factors associated with DSM and OS were analyzed and identified using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk models. X-tile software was used to find the best cutoff value of LNR. Kaplan-Meier estimates for DSM were plotted for LNR and were compared with the log-rank test. The ROC curve evaluated the validity of the model. A total of 3223 patients with N1b PTC were identified in the SEER database between 1975 and 2019. The best cutoff value for LNR was 0.6. The multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that age, race, T3/T4 classification, distant metastasis, extent of surgery, number of metastatic lymph nodes, and LNR > 0.6 were independent risk factors for DSM (all p < 0.05). Age, sex, T4 classification, distant metastasis, extent of surgery, and LNR > 0.6 were independent risk factors for OS (all p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier method plotted a cumulative risk curve and showed that patients with LNR > 0.6 had a significantly higher risk of DSM than patients with LNR ≤ 0.6 (p = 0.002). LNR was a powerful predictor of DSM and OS in N1b PTC patients. LNR could be a useful tool for the stratification of PTC patients with lateral neck metastases.

Lymph node ratio as a survival predictor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with multiple adverse pathological features.

The study investigates the prognostic significance of lymph node ratio (LNR) on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with coexistence of multiple adverse pathological features. In total, 100 patients with coexistence of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and extranodal extension of first primary HNSCC treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. The optimal LNR cut-off value for predicting overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) was 7%. In Cox model, we observed that LNR ≥7% was a statistically significant unfavorable predictor of OS (HR: 2.689; 95% CI: 1.228-5.889; p = 0.013) and CSS (HR: 3.162; 95% CI: 1.234-8.102; p = 0.016). For HNSCC patients with coexistence of multiple adverse pathological features, LNR is an independent survival predictor. Novel intensified treatments are needed for the subgroup of patients with a high LNR.

Use of lymph node ratio to guide clinical decision-making concerning adjuvant radiotherapy in pT1-2N1 rectal cancer.

Lymph node metastases are uncommon in pT1-2 rectal cancer. pT1-2N1 are often characterized with low tumor burden and intermediate prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is controversial in these patients. This study aimed to investigate the value of ART in pT1-2 rectal cancer and evaluate the guiding role of lymph node ratio (LNR) for utilization of ART. pT1-2N1 rectal cancer patients who received surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy between 2000 and 2018 with at least 12 lymph node harvest were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We used time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal cutoff of LNR. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to determine the prognostic value of ART in pT1-2N1 rectal cancer patients and subgroups stratified by LNR. A total of 674 and 1321 patients with pT1N1 and pT2N1 rectal cancer were eligible for analysis. There was no statistical cancer-specific survival (CSS) difference in pT1N1 rectal cancer patients between receiving and not receiving ART (P = 0.464). The 5-year CSS was 89.6% and 83.2% in pT2N1 rectal cancer patients between receiving and not receiving ART, respectively (P = 0.003). A total of 7.0% was identified as the optimal cutoff value of LNR. Survival improvement offered by ART was only found in LNR ≥ 7.0% subgroup (5-year CSS: 89.5% versus 79.6%, P = 0.003) instead of LNR < 7.0% subgroup (5-year CSS: 89.9% versus 86.3%, P = 0.208). ART show substantial survival benefit in pT2N1 rectal cancer patients with LNR ≥ 7.0%, warranting the conventional adoption of ART in this subgroup.

Development and Validation of an Immunotherapy-Related Prognostic Signature Based on Lymph Node Ratio for Gastric Cancer

Background. The long-term prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) remains poor due to postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The increasing evidence show that the lymph node ratio (LNR) serves as an independent prognostic factor in patients with GC. In this study, we aimed to develop a prognostic signature for GC based on LNR. Methods. Survival analysis was conducted by comparing low- and high-LNR groups according to the optimal cutoff value of LNR, which was identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Then, we identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to LNR in the training cohort of GC. Univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were performed to construct the risk score signature. We then evaluated the risk score signature from the viewpoints of survival, clinic-pathological characteristics, tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic efficacy. Results. High LNR was significantly correlated with poorer prognosis and was an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with GC. Then, an eleven-gene signature that could predict the prognosis of GC patients was developed based on LNR-related DEGs in the training cohort, and the results were further confirmed in external independent cohort. In addition, the high-risk group showed aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, specific TME status, low TMB, and low immunotherapeutic sensitivity. Conclusions. The present study constructed an eleven-gene prognostic signature based on LNR to predict the prognosis of patients with GC and facilitate the development of individualized treatment strategy.

Reliability of the Lymph Node Ratio in the Prediction of Gastric Cancer Survival

Background. Lymph node metastasis is the major determinant factor in the prognosis of gastric cancer. There is still no definite consensus on the lymph node number that should be harvested during gastric cancer surgery. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of pathologically examined lymph nodes. LNR has been proposed to be a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In this study the reliability of the LNR is tested for being a prognostic factor in gastric cancer survival. Methods. Medical records of 244 patients, with neither distant metastases nor neoadjuvant treatment underwent curative gastrectomy, were analyzed retrospectively in terms of survival according to the lymph node ratio (LNR). Patients were divided in two groups by using LNR cut-off value. Results. LNR of 0.4 was proved to be the best cut-off value to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that age over 65 (p &lt; 0.001), and LNR ≥ 0.4 (p = 0.02) were independent factors in gastric cancer survival. Patients with LNR ≥ 0.4 presented with worse outcomes regarding other prognostic parameters (tumor differentiation, tumor diameter, lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion), despite similar numbers of lymph nodes being harvested in both groups during surgery. Conclusion. Lymph node ratio is a reliable parameter to predict the survival in gastric cancer.

A proposed grading scheme for predicting recurrence in medullary thyroid cancer based on the Ki67 index and metastatic lymph node ratio.

The Ki67 index and lymph node ratio (LNR) have been proposed as components of alternative pathological classification schemes, but the most appropriate classification for patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to examine the usefulness of a new grading system combining the Ki67 index and LNR as a predictor of prognostic and disease-free survival (DFS) in MTC. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with MTC who were registered at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China from June 2003 to October 2021. The DFS rates were assessed using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression modeling to explore the relationship among pathological features, nutritional status and DFS. The Ki67 index (cutoff value: 5% and 10%) and LNR (cutoff value: 0.2 and 0.3) were combined to create a new grading system. In total, 101 matched patients were assessed. The integrated grading system showed better separation of Kaplan Meier (KM) curves for DFS. As the grading stage progressed, there was a significant stepwise decrease in DFS, which was better than Ki67, LNR and N staging alone. According to the grading system, the high-risk group had a worse prognosis. The proposed grading scheme demonstrated a better prognostic performance in MTC patients than the Ki67, LNR and N staging alone. However, larger scale studies are needed to further verify our findings.

Analysis of factors associated with the prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer and the construction of a survival model.

To study the survival prediction value of lymph node ratio (LNR) and preoperative thyroglobulin (Tg) in the prognosis of thyroid papillary carcinoma (PTC). A total of 495 patients with PTC and lymph node metastasis treated at the Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were selected for a retrospective study. The disease-free survival (DFS) of patients was the follow-up endpoint. DFS was calculated for all patients. The Cox proportional risk regression model and nomogram were used to predict the survival prognosis of PTC with lymph node metastasis by index. LNR and preoperative Tg level cutoff values were obtained using ROC curves. To express DFS, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created. Using 3- and 5-year calibration curves and AUC values, the prognostic models' precision and discrimination were assessed. Clinical decision curve analysis was used to forecast clinical benefitability. Finally, the results were validated using internal cross-validation. The cutoff values of LNR and preoperative Tg level were 0.295 and 50.24, respectively, and they were divided into two groups according to the cutoff values. Multifactorial Cox regression models showed that NLNM, LNR, and preoperative Tg level (all p< 0.05) were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of PTC with lymph node metastasis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed higher DFS rates in the group with low NLNM (<10), LNR (<0.295), and preoperative Tg level (<50.24) groups. The 3-year and 5-year calibration curves showed good agreement. A ROC curve analysis was performed on the nomogram model, and its AUC values at 3 and 5 years were, respectively, 0.805 and 0.793. Clinical decision curves indicate good clinical benefit. Finally, internal cross-validation demonstrated the legitimacy of the prognostic model. The LNR and preoperative Tg levels, in combination with other independent factors, were effective in predicting the survival prognosis for patients with PTC.

Lymph node ratio predicts recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival of patients with pyriform sinus squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectiveThis study assessed positive lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic marker for patients with pyriform sinus cancer. MethodsThe present study retrospectively analyzed 101 patients with pyriform sinus cancer to determine the association of LNR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). ResultsThe patients were followed up for a median duration of 28 months (range: 6–196 months). The number of median dissected lymph nodes (LNs) was 41, and the number of median positive LNs was three. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an LNR cut-off value of 8.6%. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or perineural invasion (PNI) (P = 0.001), thyroid gland invasion (TGI, P = 0.000), positive LNs >4 (P = 0.036), and LNR >8.6% (P = 0.008) were significantly associated with poor RFS, and LVI or PNI (P = 0.005), tumor pT3/T4 stage (P = 0.028), positive LNs >4 (P = 0.033), TGI (P = 0.001), and LNR >8.6% (P = 0.003) were significantly associated with poor DSS. The multivariate analysis revealed that LVI or PNI (P = 0.010), TGI (P = 0.000), and LNR >8.6% (P = 0.022) were independent predictors for poor RFS, while tumor pT3/T4 stage (P = 0.049), TGI (P = 0.015), and LNR >8.6% (P = 0.001) were independent predictors for poor DDS. ConclusionLNR and other clinicopathological data can be used to predict the RFS and DSS of pyriform sinus cancer patients.

Construction of a new clinical staging system for colorectal cancer based on the lymph node ratio: A validation study.

AimThis study aims to construct a new staging system for colorectal cancer (CRC) based on the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a supplement to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for predicting the prognosis of CRC patients with <12 lymph nodes.MethodsThe data of 26,695 CRC patients with <12 lymph nodes were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as a training set. A total of 635 CRC patients were also enrolled from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital affiliated with Yangzhou University as an independent validation set. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to obtain the LNR cutoff value. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used for comparisons of differences among the survival curves. The monotonic decreasing trend of the overall survival curve in the staging system was expressed by the linear correlation degree R.ResultsThe 5-year survival rates of patients in the training set based on the AJCC staging system from stage I to stage IV were 75.6% (95%CI: 74.4–76.8), 59.8% (95%CI: 58.6–61.0), 42.1% (95%CI: 34.5–49.7), 33.2% (95%CI: 24.6–41.8), 72.0% (95%CI: 69.1–74.9), 48.8% (95%CI: 47.4–50.2), 26.5% (95%CI: 23.0–30.0), and 11.3% (95%CI: 10.3–12.3). The 5-year survival rates of patients in the training set from stage I to stage IIIC were 80.4%, 72.9%, 59.8%, 48.4%, 32.5%, and 15.0%, according to the TNM + LNR (TNRM) staging system. According to the AJCC staging system, the 5-year survival rates of patients in the validation set from stage I to stage IIIC were 91.3%, 90.8%, 72.6%, 61.3%, 72.4%, 58.1%, and 32.8%. Based on the TNRM staging system, the 5-year survival rates of patients in the validation set from stage I to stage IIIC were 99.2%, 90.5%, 81.4%, 78.6%, 60.2%, and 35.8%.ConclusionThe TNRM staging system successfully eliminated “survival paradox” in the AJCC staging system, which might be superior to the AJCC staging system.

The Effect of Examined Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Ratio on Pathological Nodal Classification in the Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma After Lobectomy.

ObjectiveThe effects of examined lymph nodes (LNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR) on pN classification and the prognosis are unclear in lung adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) patients. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the significance of LNs and LNR in the prognosis of ASC and the impact of the abovementioned factors on the pN classification.MethodsPatients diagnosed with pathological stage T1-4N0-2M0 ASC from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included in the study. The primary clinical endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The optimal cutoff values of the LNs and LNR were determined. An LN indicator, including pN0 #LNs ≤9, pN0 #LNs >9, pN+ #LNR ≤0.53, and pN+ #LNR > 0.53, was developed. Concordance index (C-index) was used to compare the prognostic predictive ability between N classification and LN indicator. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used in this study.ResultsThe cohort of 1,416 patients were included in the study. The level of LNs stratified the patients without metastasis of lymph nodes (pN0 #LNs ≤9 vs. pN0 #LNs >9, unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.255, P = 0.037). Two groups based on the cutoff value of LNR differentiated prognosis of patients with metastasis of lymph nodes (pN+ #LNR >0.53 vs. pN+ #LNR ≤0.53, unadjusted HR = 1.703, P = 0.001). The LN indicator had a much better predictive ability over N classification in this cohort (LN indicator: C-index = 0.615; N classification: C-index = 0.602, P = 0.001).ConclusionsWe explored clinicopathological factors affecting prognosis in resected lung ASC patients. Besides, the LN indicator was confirmed to be played an essential role in affecting the survival rate in ASC patients. The high-level LNs or low-level LNR might be corelated to improved survival outcomes.

Comparison of different lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis in patients with colon cancer who have undergone surgical resection.

At present, the most widely used lymph node (LN) staging system in colon cancer is number of metastatic LNs in pathological assessment (pN) from the 8th edition of the TNM American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control staging system, which considers the number of metastatic LNs, omitting the total number of dissected LNs. The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic performance of pN with alternative LN staging systems, including LN ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS). The clinical and histopathological data of 298 patients with colon cancer who underwent elective surgical resection in a single surgical centre were analysed. LNR and LODDS cut-off values according to two previous studies were selected to separate patients into different subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to distinguish prognostic factors. The three-step multivariate analysis showed that LNR was a superior prognostic indicator compared with pN and LODDS. Additionally, the Akaike Information Criterion, a measure of the relative quality of statistical models, confirmed that LNR displayed the best prognostic performance. Similarly, in a subpopulation of patients with number of dissected LNs (NDLN) ≥12, LNR was the most accurate LN staging system in relation to prognosis. In a subpopulation with NDLN <12, there was no significant difference in LN classification prognosis of 5-year overall survival; however, LNR and LODDS were more independent of NDLN than pN. Among the three LN classifications, LNR is the most accurate LN staging system for predicting prognosis for patients with colon cancer who have undergone surgical resection, particularly those with metastatic LNs subjected to adequate lymphadenectomy.