Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Research Articles

A study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in the dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Gujarat

Background: Various drugs are responsible for different cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). Considering variation in drug responses and the day-to-day increasing burden of ADRs, this study was done with emphasis on the need for effective evaluation and the reporting of the ADR reporting programme. Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted for the duration of six months in the dermatology department to evaluate various clinical patterns of CADRs. Results: A total of 60 CADRs were reported. Among them, 51.67% were present in males and 48.33% were present in females. The most common CADR was FDE (35%), followed by macula-papular rash (25%). Antimicrobials were most commonly responsible for CADRs, followed by NSAIDs, antiepileptic, anti-gout, and anti-hypertensive medications. Conclusions: For better patient care, drug safety, and rational use of medicines, knowledge of various drugs responsible for CADRs can be useful for health care professionals to reduce mortality and morbidity by monitoring, reporting, and assessment of CADRs whenever detected.

Drug induced bullous fixed drug eruption: a case report

Bullous fixed drug eruption, which is a cutaneous adverse drug reaction, is commonly seen with antimicrobials and analgesics. Bullous drug eruptions are infrequent, but because they pose a challenge both to affected patients and to treating physicians, they are considered to be the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). It is important to recognize these conditions and to differentiate them from other clinical entities involving blister formation. There may be early signs and symptoms that indicate a severe bullous drug eruption even before blisters and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes become obvious. Once the diagnosis is suspected, appropriate diagnostic procedures and adequate management must be initiated. The latter includes identification of the potentially inducing drug, although it should be taken into account that not all cases of bullous eruptions are drug-induced. In cases with drug causality the potentially culprit agent must be withdrawn, while in cases with other aetiology the underlying condition, e.g. an infection, must be treated appropriately. In addition to best supportive care, immunomodulating therapy may be considered. Here we report 64-year-old male with bullous fixed drug eruptions due to doxycycline administration.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in children with a focus on hypersensitivity to systemic drugs: A narrative review

Drug hypersensitivity in children is rare compared to adults. Children more frequently develop an infection-associated exanthema. Nevertheless, about 95% of children with drug hypersensitivity present with mucocutaneous involvement. Early recognition of typical clinical symptoms is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. We review relevant type I and type IV disorders of drug hypersensitivity in children and discuss their differential diagnoses and treatment.

Influence of pharmacogenomic polymorphisms on allopurinol-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Thai patients

BackgroundAllopurinol has been causing substantial morbidity and mortality particularly in Asian population by producing cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs). Nonetheless, there are no data describing whether other genetics are a valid marker for prediction of allopurinol-induced cADRs patients in addition to HLA-B*58:01 allele. The goal of this study was to identify suitable single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for allopurinol induced cADRs among Thai patients. Methods: We conducted a case-control association study after enrolling 57 Thai patients with allopurinol induced cADRs and 101 allopurinol-tolerant controls. The genetic biomarkers and associated SNPs located on chromosome 6p21 were examined by TaqMan® SNP genotyping assays in both the cases and the controls.ResultsOut of fifteen SNPs in nine genes, we found four combined SNPs (rs3099844 of HCP5, rs9263726 of PSORS1C1, rs9263733 of POLR2LP, and rs9263745 of CCHCR1) were significantly associated with allopurinol-induced cADRs compared to the tolerant controls (OR 73.2; 95% CI 24.2–266.8; P = 1.9 × 10− 24). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these combinations were 84%, 94%, 9%, and 100%, respectively. However, the variant alleles of these SNP combinations were detected in 89.5% (51/57) of the cases. Moreover, the HLA-B*58:01 allele was observed in 86.0% of patients with allopurinol-induced cADRs, but only in 4.0% of tolerant controls (OR: 137.2; 95% CI: 38.3–670.5 and p-value = 1.7 × 10− 27).ConclusionsThus, this research confirms the association between the specific HLA-B*58:01 allele and all phenotypes of allopurinol-induced cADRs in Thais. Furthermore, there was found the combined four SNPs (rs3099844, rs9263726, rs9263733, and rs9263745) could be used as alternative novel biomarkers for predicting cADRs in patients taking allopurinol.

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Case Report to Oral Acyclovir

SJS/TEN is a rare, potentially life threatening, immune-complex-mediated cutaneous adverse drug reaction. Almost one-third of cases are idiopathic. This syndrome is associated with drug treatment as well as infectious agents, neoplasia, and connective tissue diseases. Here we report a 36-year-old male presenting with toxic epidermal necrolysis after 2 days of oral acyclovir.
 Keywords: Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; acyclovir

Association of HLA-A∗11:01, HLA-B∗39:01, and HLA-B∗56:03 with salazosulfapyridine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Association of HLA-A∗11:01, HLA-B∗39:01, and HLA-B∗56:03 with salazosulfapyridine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Precision in Language Regarding Geographic Region of Origin in Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Research

Precision in Language Regarding Geographic Region of Origin in Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Research

Impact of antiretroviral therapy on cutaneous adverse drug reactions in adult HIV patients: A study from a tertiary care hospital

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) significantly impact public healthcare, especially among HIV patients. These reactions, which range from mild pruritus to severe conditions such as Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), affect the quality of life and treatment outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The current study was designed to evaluate the various types of cutaneous ADRs (CADRs) in adult HIV patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART). Materials and Methods: A retrospective record-based study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy, Government Medical College/Government General Hospital, Suryapet, Telangana, India. Data from November 2017 to October 2020 were analyzed, focusing on patients over 18 years on ART. Relevant demographic and medical data, including blood tests, liver and renal function, and CD4 counts, were collected. Results: Out of 3532 patients on ART, 568 (16.08%) developed CADRs. Females represented 54.2% of these cases. The age group most affected was between 29 and 48 years. The most common ART regimen was Tenofovir+Lamivudin+Dolutegravir, followed by zidovudine-based combinations. Nevirapine-based regimens had a higher association with CADRs, particularly severe reactions such as SJS and TEN. Conclusion: A significant proportion of HIV patients on ART experience CADRs, with certain drug combinations posing higher risks. This study highlights the need for careful monitoring and selection of ART regimens to minimize the risk of severe CADRs, thereby improving patient outcomes and quality of life in HIV treatment.

Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions on application of Nagaradi Lepa - A Retrospective analysis

Introduction: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are among the most common types of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Although considered natural and safe, Ayurveda medicines can cause adverse reactions. This article highlights the cases of cutaneous adverse drug reactions possibly due to external application of Nagaradi lepa. Materials and Methods: This is an observational, retrospective and record based study conducted by analyzing the spontaneous reported ADR forms, caused by the external application of Nagaradi lepa, collected over a period of 12 months (April 2022 to March 2023) at Peripheral Pharmacovigilance Centre, VPSV Ayurveda College Kottakkal, Kerala. Results: During the period of one year, 3 cutaneous ADRs were reported due to external application of Nagaradi lepa. All the 3 cases fall under the category of Probable according to Naranjo’s ADR Probability scale. 2 cases were mild and 1 case was moderate in severity. All the 3 cases were recovered from ADR. Conclusion: Though under reporting, we may have to consider the possibility of Ayurvedic drugs to cause adverse drug reactions. Pharmacovigilance is an ongoing and continuous process. Reporting of ADR to Pharmacovigilance centers help to generate information on ADR related Ayurvedic formulations and also to prevent its recurrence. 

Cutaneous Reactions after COVID-19 Vaccines: Analysis of the Clinical and Histopathological Spectrum-Case Series and Review of the Literature.

(1) Background: Various cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are observed with the implementation of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. To gain insight into the clinicopathologic features, we analyzed the correlation of histological and clinical data in 48 patients with these ADRs. (2) Methods: Single-center retrospective study in patients with ADRs after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines). (3) Results: Distant generalized ADRs prevailed (91%), often appearing clinically as spongiotic dermatitis or maculopapular exanthema. Histopathological analysis revealed spongiotic changes (46%) and dermal superficial perivascular predominantly lymphocytic infiltrates (17%). Eosinophils were found in 66% of biopsies, neutrophils in 29%, and plasma cells only in 8% of biopsies. Most ADRs occurred after the second vaccine dose (44%). Histologically spongiotic changes were associated with clinical features of spongiotic dermatitis in only 50% of patients and maculopapular exanthema in the remaining patients. ADRs represented an aggravation of preexisting skin disease in 23% of patients. ADRs regressed within 28 days or less in 53% of patients and persisted beyond a month in the remaining patients. (4) Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a diverse spectrum of generalized ADRs, revealing correlations between histology and clinical features but also instances of divergence. Interestingly, in about half of our patients, ADRs were self-limited, whereas ADRs extended beyond a month in the other half.

Novel Strategy in the Detection of Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions: A Case Series Study.

With multimorbidity on the rise, adverse cutaneous drug reactions are becoming a daily challenge in clinical practice. The objective evaluation of the skin lesion is crucial but hardly realized due to missing technology and guidelines. In this study, the novel Dermus SkinScanner-U, an optically guided high-frequency ultrasound imaging device, was evaluated regarding its comparability with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the pharmacological analysis of the patients' drug therapy. A total of 40 adult patients were evaluated, all with chronic medication use and skin lesions that led to non-compliance toward the pharmacotherapy. With the ongoing aim of further improving the methodology, the first results, with two detailed patient cases, are presented here. It was concluded that in the cases evaluated, there was a significant correlation between the characteristics of the lesions observed on the optical and ultrasound image, the DLQI score, and the pharmacological analysis. The next steps include increasing the scale of the study to ultimately develop a quality-assured methodology for the correct diagnosis of skin-related adverse drug reactions and to prepare a database with the most frequently observed events.

Evaluation of severe adverse cutaneous drug reactions in patients admitted to tertiary care center: A cross-sectional study.

Adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDRs) are common and potentially life-threatening, while also hindering patient compliance to medications. Given the regional differences in patterns and prevalence of ACDRs, it is important to study the epidemiology, as well as the clinical and outcome patterns of patients with ACDRs in Iran. This cross-sectional study on ACDRs was conducted among hospitalized patients in a referral university hospital in the city of Isfahan, Iran. The patients' demographics, clinical information, and outcomes, including age, gender, past medical history, medication history, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) diagnosis, Steven-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) diagnosis, toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) diagnosis, treatment regimen (steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIG]) and outcome information, including intensive care requirements, severe medical complications, or death, were obtained from medical records. A total of 195 patients with a mean age of 40 years and consisting of 61% females were included. Carbamazepine, lamotrigine, sodium valproate, and phenytoin are the most commonly reported medications. Rate of complications was 45% with DRESS, SJS, and TEN diagnosed in 26%, 47%, and 19%, respectively. Treatment was carried out with steroids and IVIG in 81% and 19%, respectively. Among patients, 15% required intensive care and 5% died. Diagnosis of TEN, older age, and baseline heart disease were predictors of mortality. Patients with SJS were younger and more likely to be males, and they were more likely to have eye complications. On the other hand, patients with the diagnosis of TEN were more likely to receive IVIG and intensive care, and had a higher mortality rate. Our study provides insight into the demographics and clinical patterns of Iranian patients with ACDRs. This will help in predicting rates of complications, treatments, and outcomes in patients and therefore make proper management decisions.

Causes and Management of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: A Comprehensive Review.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are one of the most broadly studied and rigorously researched conditions in recent dermatological advancements. Also termed as "toxidermia," they are heavily involved and are of utmost importance to be understood and studied in the modern healthcare industry. In simple terms, they are dermatological manifestations which result from systemic drug administration to patients. Since allopathy is influenced by the medicines and drugs provided to the patients, cutaneous skin eruptions are a common occurrence in recent times. It is a need of the hour to understand the causative factors for such skin eruptions and the correct management and handling of such disorders to provide better healthcare to patients. The withdrawal of the causative drug which induces the reaction plays a key role in treatment. The risk factors are to be thoroughly studied, and dosages must be in accordance with the patient's situation. They are some of the common public health problems. The age group which is affected is highly variable as people from all age groups can be affected. Those who are affected comprise approximately 10% of all hospitalized patients, and it is also observed in about 1-4% of people who are on multiple medications.

Clinical Profile of Patients with Lichenoid Drug Eruption: A Observational Study

Background: Lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) is an uncommon cutaneous adverse drug reaction, where a variety of drugs used in day-to-day clinical practice have been implicated. Objective: To describe the clinico-demographic characteristics of patients with LDE and to identify the most likely drugs involved. Methods: In this prospective, observational study, consecutive patients with LDE presenting to the dermatology department of a tertiary teaching hospital were included. The clinico-demographic profile of patients with LDE and implicated drugs was noted. Treatment of drug reaction along with outcome was also documented. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used for causality assessment of the drug reactions. A thorough literature review on LDE was also undertaken due to the paucity of existing literature. Results: A total of 15 patients (11 males and 4 females) with LDE were evaluated. Their age ranged from 37 to 61 years, with a mean of 51.53 ± 7.59 years. Anti-hypertensive medications (40%) were the most common culprit agent, followed by antitubercular drugs (33.4%), anti-diabetic agents (13.3%), and others (13.3%). The latent period (time from drug initiation to the appearance of a cutaneous eruption) varied from 15 days to 6 months (mean 2.2 months). Cutaneous involvement was generalized in 73.4% and photo-distributed lesions in 26.6%. Drug provocation test was done to identify the culprit drug. According to the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale, one-third of LDEs were “definite,” whereas two-thirds were designated as “probable.” Conclusion: LDE is more common in the elderly population. The latent period is comparatively longer in LDE than in other common drug reactions. Prompt recognition and withdrawal of suspected drug are essential to minimize disease morbidity.

Serum Levels of Interleukin-1 Beta are Decreased in Patients with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis at the Time of Hospitalization

BACKGROUND: Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Some immunological and genetic factors are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease, including tumor necrotic factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and interleukin (IL)-17. IL-1β is one of the most prominent cytokines associated with the innate immune response. AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the serum level of IL-1β in SJS/TEN and the relation between it and the progress of SJS/TEN. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, in Hanoi, Vietnam, from October 2017 to September 2019. 48 SJS/TEN patients, 43 erythema multiforme (EM) patients, and 20 healthy controls (HCs) participated. IL-1β levels were measured using the fluorescence covalent microbead immunosorbent assay (ProcartaPlex Immunoassay Panels kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare serum IL-1β levels. The Wilcoxon tests were used to compare quantitative variables before and after the treatment. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 19 SJS patients (39.5%) and 29 TEN patients (60.5%) participated in our study. The mean age was 49.3 years; the range was 19–77 years (47.9% males; 52.1% females). The most common causative drugs were traditional medicine (29.1%), carbamazepine (12.5%), and allopurinol (12.5%). On the day of hospitalization, the mean serum level of IL-1β of the SJS/TEN group was 26.4 ± 81.7 pg/mL, ranging from 0.5 pg/mL to 447 pg/mL. This level was significantly lower than that of the HCs group (p < 0.001) but not lower than that of the EM group. The mean serum level of IL-1β in the SJS/TEN patients on the day of hospitalization was 26.4 ± 81.7 pg/ml, higher than that on the day of re-epithelialization (1.9 ± 5.6 pg/mL) and the difference was statistically significant with p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Serum IL-1β level in SJS/TEN patients is lower than in HCs. It is not a good biomarker to differentiate SJS/TEN from EM.

Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Reported at an ADR Monitoring Center of a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute in Central India.

Background Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are among the most frequent ADRs. Knowledge of the pattern of cutaneous ADRs (CADRs) and causal drugs helps prevent and reduce the incidence of CADR, which in turn reduces the incidence of hospitalization and expenses for the patient. Objectives To analyze CADR according to demographic profile, morphological pattern, causative drugs, severity, and outcome in patients suffering from CADRs. Materials and methods Retrospective data analysis was conducted in the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre (AMC) of the tertiary care teaching institute between February 2020 and September 2023 under the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI). All ADRs reported were analyzed based on the following parameters: total number of ADRs reported, number of CADRs, information related to demographic parameters, the clinical presentation of CADRs, and suspected medication. Causality assessment was done using theWorld Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale. Severity was assessed using a modified Hartwig and Seigel scale. Results A total of 125 CADRs were analyzed. Considering the gender-wise distribution,65 females and 60 males suffered from CADR. The most common drug category responsible for CADRs was antimicrobials (63.2%), followed by topical agents (12.8%). Maculopapular rash (33.6%) was the most common presenting symptom, followed by itching (27.2%). Few patients suffered from serious CADRs such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Conclusion A wide clinical spectrum of CADRs ranging from maculopapular rash to fixed-drug eruption to serious SJS was observed in our study. The most common causative agents for CADRs were antimicrobials, followed by topical agents and NSAIDs. For early diagnosis and management of CADRs,it is critical to have data on the potential cutaneous adverse effects of commonly used drugs, to educate the patients regarding common early symptoms of drug reactions (e.g., erythematous rash, edema, urticaria, mucosal erosions, itching, burning of skin, etc.), and to monitor the patient, especially during the start of therapy.To ease the burden of CADRs, a therapeutic plan of anticipating, avoiding, recognizing, and responding to ADRs should be implemented.

Oral Antibiotics and the Risk of Serious Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions

Oral Antibiotics and the Risk of Serious Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions

Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Regional Experience of a Global Challenge.

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are considered any harmful and unintended side effects associated with the use of a drug at the usual therapeutic dose, in which skin is involved in most cases. Therefore, the availability of epidemiological information on reactions, reaction patterns, and their causative drugs can be helpful in timely diagnosis and necessary measures, such as caution in prescribing causative drugs to prevent these types of reactions. In this retrospective descriptive study, the archived files of patients with dermatoses due to ADR referred to Taleghani University Hospital, Urmia, Iran, during 2015-2020 were studied. Patterns and frequency of skin reactions, demographic data, and the frequency of chronic comorbidities were identified. A total of 50 patients with drug-induced skin rash were found, of which 14 were male (28%) and 36 were female (72%). Skin rashes were most frequently found in patients aged 31-40 years. In 76% of patients, there was at least one chronic underlying disease. The most common reaction pattern was maculopapular rash (44%), and the most common causative drugs were antiepileptic drugs (34%) and antibiotics (22%). Mortality was found in 4 cases, which was due to antibiotics and antiepileptic drugs that caused toxic SJS/TEN and erythroderma. The hospital stays were highest in SJS and lowest in a maculopapular rash. Knowledge about the epidemiology and the frequency of adverse drug reactions may be helpful in increasing the awareness of physicians for correct and rational drug prescriptions, which can reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and treatment costs.

To Observe the patterns of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary health care teaching hospital in Hyderabad

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are very common and seen quite often during clinical practice. It is difficult to get a comprehensive list of the various types of drug reactions and their corresponding drug due to many cases going unreported. There is a possibility of a cutaneous drug reaction every time a new drug is introduced into the market. While most types of drug reactions are trivial and benign, there is always a possibility of the reaction attaining a more malignant nature. The diagnosis of a CADR is more often based on a clinical examination. However, in order to understand the full scope of the reaction it must be reported and studied. The pharmacovigilance programme takes into account the spontaneous nature of the cases and employs alogical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors, and generation of a focused differential diagnosis. Using study tools like Naranjo scale and Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale, a physician can easily determine the severity and causality of the drug reaction. After compiling the data, one can determine the trend of the morphology of these CADRs, and determine the most likely drug responsible for the reaction. The data obtained in this study is useful for helping the clinician in the proper identification, approach and treatment of a patient suffering from a cutaneous adverse rug reaction.

A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF REPORTED CUTANEOUS ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

Objectives: Analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADR) reports enriches and updates physician’s awareness about the pattern of cutaneous adverse reactions in the population studied and may play an important role to envision the frequency of appearance of reactions to specific drugs and morphological designs. This study intends to portray the clinical profile and causative agents of dermal ADRs in our population. Methods: All the ADR reporting forms received from February 2021 to February 2023 were scrutinized, and forms with cutaneous ADRs (CADRs) were analyzed. The data about the history of drug intake, names of the drug taken, time lag of appearance of reaction, and clinical examination details were collected from the reports. Demography, prevalence, reaction time morphological pattern, and causative agents of CADRs were evaluated. Results: Among the CADRs, acute urticaria 53.4 was the most common followed by acute exanthematous reaction 35.8% and lichenoid drug eruption 3.8%. Among the drugs causing CADRs, antibiotics top the list with 47% followed by ATT at 29.7% and iron sucrose 12.9%. Among the antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones 48% top the list followed by cephalosporins 21.6% and penicillins and vancomycin each 8.3%. Conclusion: Physician’s knowledge about pattern and causative agents of CADR in the specific population can aid in prevention and early management of ADRs and thereby reducing hospitalization.